Best of 2022: Killing off the sad and the poor with MAID
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
153.78757
Summary
Dr. Sonu Gand is a psychiatrist at the University of Toronto and the Head of Psychiatry at the Humber River Hospital. He was an early supporter of medical assistance in dying, but he s alarmed by its spread to allow the mentally ill to choose assisted suicide, which is currently set to be legal in March.
Transcript
00:00:06.300
Installed window sensors, smoke sensors, and HD cameras with night vision?
00:00:10.620
And you set up credit card transaction alerts, a secure VPN for a private connection,
00:00:14.060
and continuous monitoring for our personal info on the dark web?
00:00:21.360
Choose security solutions from Telus for peace of mind at home and online.
00:00:25.220
Visit telus.com slash total security to learn more.
00:00:40.580
Earn points so fast, it'll seem too good to be true.
00:00:43.600
Plus, join Tim's Rewards today and get enough points for a free donut, drink, or Timbits.
00:00:48.400
With 800 points after registration, activation, and first purchase of a dollar or more,
00:00:51.960
see the Tim's app for details at participating restaurants in Canada for a limited time.
00:00:55.440
Bank more encores when you switch to a Scotiabank banking package.
00:01:05.820
Learn more at scotiabank.com slash banking packages.
00:01:12.740
Hi, I'm Kevin Libin, the executive producer of the Full Comment podcast.
00:01:18.220
Over the holidays, we're going to be running a couple of our favorite episodes of 2022.
00:01:22.300
With the disturbing recent developments in the federal liberals' medically-assisted dying regime,
00:01:27.760
including government workers pushing it on injured veterans,
00:01:34.340
we wanted to bring back our interview with Sonu Gand.
00:01:37.660
Gand is a doctor and was an early supporter of medical assistance in dying,
00:01:42.260
but he's alarmed by its spread to allow the mentally ill to choose assisted suicide,
00:01:51.120
Anthony Fury interviewed Gand way back in May of this year,
00:01:54.200
but the doctor's warnings have never been timelier.
00:01:59.220
you can always go back and listen to episodes of Full Comment
00:02:01.840
that you may have missed from earlier this year or further back
00:02:04.740
in our archive on Apple, Spotify, Amazon, or wherever you get your podcasts.
00:02:10.300
I want to wish a Happy New Year to all our listeners,
00:02:12.820
and we'll see you again with a whole new episode on January 9th.
00:02:18.640
Thanks for joining us for the latest episode of Full Comment.
00:02:21.200
Please consider subscribing if you haven't already.
00:02:23.460
Medical assistance in dying, MAID as it's called, is expanding in Canada
00:02:29.200
in ways that a lot of people are perhaps not even aware of.
00:02:33.640
Laws were first introduced permitting MAID in Canada just over five years ago,
00:02:37.480
but in early 2021, the categories and situations were broadened
00:02:41.240
in ways that are concerning to a number of experts.
00:02:45.100
Do we really know what we're getting into here?
00:02:47.580
Shouldn't we perhaps talk this out a little bit more as a nation?
00:02:50.480
To help us understand the complexity of these issues,
00:02:53.540
where we're at in this situation here in Canada,
00:03:00.260
Dr. Gand is a professor at the University of Toronto
00:03:02.560
and the head of psychiatry at Humber River Hospital,
00:03:05.400
where he is the physician chair of the Medical Assistance and Dying Committee.
00:03:14.900
and also more importantly for your interest in this challenging and complex topic.
00:03:26.860
but also very raw opinions out there that a lot of people are sharing.
00:03:31.420
I'm kind of surprised to find us so suddenly back at this conversation,
00:03:34.840
as I know it was a national conversation about five years ago,
00:03:42.480
And we said, well, okay, you know, take it one step at a time.
00:03:44.840
But it looks like recently we have gone a further step,
00:03:47.860
which I guess requires a subsequent conversation.
00:03:54.360
that you're taking the time to look at this issue,
00:03:57.940
because I honestly believe that the vast majority of Canadians
00:04:02.020
are completely unaware of just how far things have gone,
00:04:09.340
So I think there are a lot of misconceptions out there
00:04:12.420
about where our current expanded policies are going
00:04:20.260
Well, can you explain to us how things first sort of developed
00:04:27.160
a court ruling saying medical assistance in dying
00:04:30.340
would be allowed to end the suffering of terminally ill adults?
00:04:37.620
So what happened was in 20, the court ruling was from 2015,
00:04:43.260
and it led to laws that were implemented in 2016.
00:04:47.920
And the ruling was in a case called Carter v. Canada.
00:04:54.700
two plaintiffs, two people who were, they were fighting for the ability
00:05:03.360
And each of those people had what we call a neurodegenerative illness,
00:05:08.060
meaning an illness that has known progression and a known course to it,
00:05:15.200
and it was known that they would not be able to improve.
00:05:17.900
One of them had ALS and the other had spinal stenosis.
00:05:22.720
So what the Supreme Court found in that case was that the,
00:05:28.360
up until then, blanket prohibition the country had against assisted dying,
00:05:32.980
that the blanket prohibition violated our charter.
00:05:36.100
And what that means is they said that you can't just say that you're unable
00:05:47.020
Now, keep in mind, that prohibition was actually in the criminal,
00:05:50.160
in our criminal law, is the law that needed to change.
00:05:55.300
So what changed in 2016 to conform with that ruling
00:06:03.940
which allowed for assisted dying in certain circumstances.
00:06:12.740
was that a medical condition that was grievous,
00:06:23.720
that you needed to have a grievous and irremediable medical condition.
00:06:27.060
And one of the safeguards was that natural death
00:06:34.000
And so that's what the initial framework was based on in 2016.
00:06:40.580
What was the response among the medical community to this ruling?
00:06:43.600
Was there the sense that, yes, we need to provide
00:06:45.680
these opportunities for people, that this is a gap?
00:06:48.340
So there was, I don't know if relief is the right term,
00:06:54.120
What was the level of acceptance to resistance, would you say?
00:07:05.820
which was framed in the context of providing assisted dying
00:07:09.700
when someone is already dying, that's a key distinction,
00:07:13.780
because death needed to be reasonably foreseeable.
00:07:16.280
There has been a shift towards greater acceptance
00:07:25.480
I don't think there's 100% agreement on either side in this complex debate.
00:07:46.900
And that was a case also of a woman, Sue Rodriguez, who had ALS.
00:07:51.340
And in that ruling, the Supreme Court upheld the existing law
00:07:56.960
And in the 2015 ruling, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled
00:08:05.220
So even that represents some sort of shift in what society
00:08:13.980
The concern became, though, that some people did not agree with it,
00:08:20.560
and it did allow the option for people to be what are called conscientious objectors,
00:08:26.480
meaning if somebody did not want to participate on the medical side,
00:08:34.660
But there were others who were not conscientious objectors,
00:08:59.340
I have also been sensitized to what I think are the dire dangers
00:09:04.460
of providing assisted suicide in inappropriate situations.
00:09:12.640
And Dr. Gand, this position, physician chair of this committee,
00:09:16.020
can you break down what that is, what you do in that capacity?
00:09:22.980
Every site would have done this to develop policies
00:09:25.840
to allow for assisted dying under the existing laws.
00:09:32.700
And part of my role in that committee has been to assist the hospital
00:09:39.880
And there's also a role of oversight of the actual cases
00:09:44.540
and applications that come through for assisted dying.
00:09:48.900
My background is psychiatry and psycho-oncology.
00:09:53.260
In other words, when patients have cancer as well.
00:09:57.540
And the MADE laws that we have had up until now,
00:10:12.660
Soul mental illness conditions have not been things
00:10:16.520
that have really been open for getting MADE for.
00:10:20.560
So people could apply for MADE if they have a mental illness,
00:10:24.740
plus another condition that had been leading to foreseeable death.
00:10:36.760
we haven't had applications for soul mental illness.
00:10:44.460
of whether somebody's ALS is irremediable, for example,
00:11:08.560
which has expanded the situations and categories
00:11:20.500
So if I can take a second, I'll rewind a little bit.
00:11:34.260
no, there's no need to worry about a slippery slope.
00:11:39.360
I would say that we have not actually experienced
00:11:48.520
And I believe our MADE laws are falling off that cliff.
00:12:06.300
when death needed to be reasonably foreseeable.
00:12:12.920
When death needed to be reasonably foreseeable,
00:12:26.800
that even if someone had up to a decade to live,