Full Comment - December 22, 2025


BEST OF 2025: How a few rich dairy farmers are sabotaging Canada’s big, beautiful trading future


Episode Stats


Length

55 minutes

Words per minute

164.86293

Word count

9,201

Sentence count

6

Harmful content

Misogyny

4

sentences flagged

Toxicity

2

sentences flagged

Hate speech

3

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

In this week's episode, we chat with former liberal MP and long-time critic of supply management, Martha Hall Finley, about her thoughts on the trade dispute with the United States and what it means for Canada's economic future.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 getting down to the bottom of the trade dispute with the united states it's something we tried
00:00:07.920 to do quite often in 2025 here at full comment hello i'm brian lily your host and this is a
00:00:13.880 best of episode from the 2025 season i want to take a moment to thank you the audience all the
00:00:19.260 listeners for making it a great 2025 season and we're hoping for an even better 2026 i'm sure
00:00:26.300 that this issue of the trade dispute with the united states is going to continue to come back
00:00:31.420 it was one of the main things we talked about all year we had a discussion with carlo dade and ian
00:00:36.340 lee about what the america first movement wanted economically that episode was wildly popular so
00:00:42.260 too was an episode with martha hall finley she's a former liberal mp currently director of the
00:00:47.960 university of calgary school of public policy she's also a long-time critic of supply management and
00:00:53.860 feels that it was a giant mistake for canada's parliament to unanimously pass a bill that would
00:00:59.440 say supply management can never be part of trade negotiations she believes that just a handful of
00:01:05.180 dairy farmers are ruining it for everyone here is that conversation
00:01:09.720 donald trump was able to kill off canada's digital services tax without much of an effort or pushback from
00:01:18.180 mark carney's liberal government in ottawa will supply management be next and what about canada's
00:01:23.740 trade future hello and welcome to the full comment podcast my name is brian lilly your host this week
00:01:29.280 we want to take a deep dive into trade canada's prosperity as well as our future in some ways is
00:01:35.060 at stake the americans are moving away from their negotiated trade deal with us we've trying to get
00:01:41.300 tariffs off of that and there are trade irritants like the digital services tax which will soon be gone
00:01:47.760 and of course supply management martha hall finley is a former liberal mp from toronto she's been in 0.95
00:01:54.980 western canada for many years first is president and ceo of the canada west foundation now is president
00:02:00.460 and chair of the school of public policy at the university of calgary and trust me when i tell you
00:02:05.320 she's got some strong opinions on supply management and why she believes it needs to go for the good of
00:02:10.860 canada never mind what it means for our trade negotiations we caught up with each other at her office
00:02:16.740 in downtown calgary on the margins of the stampede here's our conversation so martha how do you view
00:02:23.340 things right now is canada in a trade war are we at a hinge moment as prime minister carney likes to
00:02:30.560 say that's one of his favorite phrases uh are are we just dealing with a transformational president
00:02:36.420 for good or for bad who is out to adjust the global trading system i think it might be a bit of all
00:02:43.960 three um there's no question that we have a moment in time right now for canada it it's interesting i
00:02:51.560 mean i i struggle with saying thanks to donald trump in the same sentence but there's no question what's
00:02:55.900 happened south of the border has really forced an awful lot of canadians and and and therefore
00:03:03.280 canadian politicians but forced an awful lot of canadians
00:03:05.940 to have a much better maybe more realistic look at our own economic situation so we have two big
00:03:15.860 problems one is yeah we are significantly dependent on the united states and we have not diversified
00:03:22.240 enough to expand those opportunities and just take away from the united states as a market because
00:03:27.440 geography will will dictate that that will always be a huge market for us um but we have have really not
00:03:34.520 taken advantage of the opportunities in the indo-pacific for example or or in other parts of the world
00:03:39.620 partly because the america because the united states has been so easy for us um but you know donald trump
00:03:46.600 has clearly made made an awful lot of people realize maybe that reliance on the united states
00:03:51.400 needs to be um looked at carefully and and force us to look at other opportunities elsewhere in addition
00:03:58.660 not just not to to move away too much from the states but the other thing is a realization that
00:04:06.880 our own economic house needs some real work our productivity numbers are terrible our uh competitiveness
00:04:14.440 compared to you know most of the countries that we compare ourselves to is is down investment has
00:04:20.260 challenged has been challenged for a long time i would say not just the last 10 years i would say
00:04:25.080 we've we've we've struggled the last 25 years um for a variety of reasons so this isn't just a
00:04:31.520 partisan it's not a partisan comment i think we just have had some real challenges in canada for 25 years
00:04:36.360 um is this a hinge moment as as a prime minister likes to call it there's no doubt in my mind this is
00:04:43.020 a moment for canada right whether whether it's how do we do better in terms of our relationship with
00:04:48.700 the united states how do we avoid tariffs how do we enhance that kind of economic engagement
00:04:54.020 whether that's with trump or a successor to trump or you know what happens after the midterms whether
00:05:00.060 he becomes less powerful the fundamental is we still need to work very closely with the united states
00:05:06.000 and we we've benefited from that open trade we should work to continue to do that but we also have
00:05:13.280 an awful lot of work in canada to get our house in order and this is a moment in time for us we've had
00:05:18.480 clearly challenges in building infrastructure we are a trade dependent nation we are therefore
00:05:24.960 dependent on trade infrastructure and we have not invested whether it be ports whether it be
00:05:31.260 additional rail whether it be yes even more highways whether it's pipelines absolutely we have
00:05:37.940 not done a very good job in the last quarter century of building the infrastructure that a trade
00:05:43.440 dependent country um depends on and so is this a moment in time for canada because we've been forced
00:05:49.820 to recognize our economic challenges absolutely are we in a position to take advantage and finally
00:05:56.460 work at getting things right um i sure hope so but we're in early days so far the the words are
00:06:04.400 sounding good the language is good um but as we've seen too many times words don't always get followed
00:06:13.520 uh with action and so here's you know really hoping that we'll see action finally um to really get this
00:06:22.220 country back onto the road of of the prosperity that we really ought to be able to see you mentioned in
00:06:27.920 that answer about um diversifying trade i looked at some stats from a while back and in the 1890s when
00:06:36.420 canada was very much a part of a very big and burgeoning british empire we sent about 60 61 percent
00:06:43.780 of our exports to either the uk or countries of the empire and we were also reliant on them for defense
00:06:51.020 now we're reliant on the united states for defense and we send more than 75 percent of our exports to the
00:06:56.100 united states so did we just trade one empire for the other that we're reliant upon oh goodness i
00:07:01.740 had not have thought of that uh that's an interesting question uh well one i'm not sure it's a question of
00:07:09.940 reliance i think it's more a question of opportunity and of course over that period of time the united
00:07:17.040 states has became way more way bigger way more powerful economically but also if i remember
00:07:25.940 correctly there were significant um there were barriers perhaps to to trade i'd have to go back
00:07:33.020 and look but there were certainly um uh fewer trade barriers like fewer tariff barriers between canada and
00:07:41.480 the uk and the empire the other empire countries at that time yeah um so that might have also been a part
00:07:48.420 of that but look we're we're not that big we're obviously geographically very big which does create
00:07:56.160 certain challenges for us but we're not very big and and we're sizable economically but compared to the
00:08:01.800 united states um we have no choice but to recognize that we are not their equal we will not be their
00:08:11.740 equal economically we will not be their equal militarily and so i think over the last you know
00:08:18.560 century and a half two centuries and certainly the last few decades it's been more opportunity than
00:08:24.000 anything else i there's no question now given some of trump's um sloganeering and and language
00:08:33.140 that the comfort we've had with that relationship has been put on edge but i don't i i don't see
00:08:43.960 the united states as being necessarily similar vis-a-vis canada to what was our relationship
00:08:52.120 as a member of the commonwealth so many years ago but in terms of that size that you mentioned how do we
00:08:59.140 compensate for that you know we're important trading partners but when you look at the numbers
00:09:05.240 about 20 percent of our gdp relies on trade with the united states theirs is less than two percent i
00:09:11.080 think it's 1.6 1.7 and we see that with the uh the backtracking on the digital services tax which by the
00:09:19.200 way i think was the right thing to do i think prime minister carney played it horribly by saying
00:09:24.020 oh no we're moving forward with it and then you know less than two hours before midnight when it's
00:09:30.080 about to kick in says we'll get rid of it but getting rid of it was the good idea but on other
00:09:36.000 issues we're just going to face the fact that they have a lot an awful lot of power i'm not going to
00:09:40.720 use trump saying that they have all the cards but they've got an awful lot of power over us and leverage
00:09:46.360 they absolutely do but and and and just i can't resist but on the digital services tax
00:09:55.240 we should as canada we should have waited and kept with the much larger group of countries that
00:10:05.480 were trying to work on this collaboratively our decision a couple years back to go it alone
00:10:12.480 um which a couple of other countries have as well but for canada to do that set us up for a problem
00:10:18.700 um it has been an irritant with the americans not just donald trump right from the time we said we're
00:10:24.940 going we're not going to we're not going to wait for this other group of countries the oecd
00:10:29.080 countries exactly so um you know i my preference would have been not to have gone down that path in
00:10:36.660 the first place and then having to rescind it because and of course it's not rescinded right it's just
00:10:41.460 we're not charging it there's i mean they've promised that they'll bring in legislation to
00:10:46.420 rescind it but you're right it is still on the books but you know in terms of strategy um if they
00:10:53.200 had announced the um the week before it was supposed to come into effect look we're going to put a pause
00:11:00.320 on this it still could have been a bargaining chip and what i kept hearing from liberal mps and insiders
00:11:05.420 was well we're using it as a bargaining chip to try and get something bigger that's why we haven't
00:11:09.720 gotten rid of it but you know we'll get rid of it but not yet because we need it for bargaining
00:11:13.500 and then they they gave it up with getting absolutely nothing but a resumption of talks in
00:11:18.620 return i i don't we i'm not hearing that it was for nothing um and i don't know yeah and i there's an
00:11:26.540 awful lot going on behind the scenes that that neither one of us is privy to i don't my my understanding
00:11:33.560 is that there is a lot more going on behind the scenes that there may have there may have been
00:11:40.280 some bargaining who knows there might have been some of this discussion uh at can and ask us but
00:11:45.640 you know digital services tax you know my views on supply management like oh we'll get into that
00:11:51.140 that's on the list can we please because my gosh um but i i i just i think there's a real
00:12:00.340 with all of this there is a moment now for canada to actually do the right things for canada
00:12:09.620 not just for donald trump we shouldn't be just playing around and and it's not playing we shouldn't
00:12:16.260 be reacting and you know and trying to figure out what what how we can best donald trump we're not
00:12:23.580 we're not going to economically we there's the best way to deal with the fact that we have an elephant
00:12:28.920 to the south of us is first understand that we have a relationship with an elephant and that comes
00:12:34.840 with some opportunities and it comes with some challenges without question being pragmatic is
00:12:39.680 probably the best strategy canada could embark on when you talk about that trade imbalance though
00:12:45.580 there are a couple of nuances a big amount of that trade that we have with the united states are
00:12:51.400 our exports to the to the united states is of course oil right and they need that oil the gulf coast
00:12:57.360 refinery complex needs canadian oil they need it's it's all set up for canadian heavy so that's
00:13:04.720 there's there's definitely some power some influence there we it may you know maybe not long long term
00:13:11.340 but right now that is a bit of a bargaining uh i wouldn't say it's a bargaining chip because we're not
00:13:17.100 going to cut it off but it's a recognition that it's that there are certain strengths and weaknesses
00:13:22.740 that are a little more nuanced than just the top level trade numbers the other thing though but
00:13:27.260 but just to finish the other thing is that that trade balance that canada has with some of the
00:13:33.520 some of the states like 30 different states of the united states actually do trade heavily with canada
00:13:41.880 and so i've been saying this right from the beginning our best allies in dealing with donald trump's
00:13:49.560 tariff nonsense are in fact americans they're the americans in a number of those states number of
00:13:55.840 the manufacturers that are now being hurt by some of the tariff impositions if you know you're dependent
00:14:00.880 on canadian steel and aluminum your your prices just went up and so you're going to be not happy about
00:14:07.620 that that the the biggest allies we have the biggest strength we have right now is frankly with a
00:14:14.500 whole lot of americans especially in those states and especially in those manufacturing sectors who
00:14:20.480 are hurting more from donald trump's tariffs than we are yeah and i think that um ontario premier doug
00:14:25.960 ford has been very good on that working those connections going to the meetings with governors
00:14:31.320 and pointing that out you know it's going to require the americans actually making that point
00:14:36.880 in washington to the audience of one but it helps that the conversation is there but you mentioned about
00:14:42.680 oil and we're not going to cut it off so this is where i'm going to tap into your roots as an
00:14:48.560 easterner now in calgary so i get the pre the position of alberta premier danielle smith this is
00:14:56.920 a non-starter i get it politically economically so many reasons but out east you listen to an awful
00:15:04.000 lot of the commentary oh why won't they just cut it off they're not on team canada they don't care
00:15:09.100 about the country um the premier's a traitor uh you know all of these things that you hear from folks
00:15:15.260 that never leave rosedale or westmount and uh don't really have a sense of why that would be
00:15:23.240 an unthinkable idea out here so help help those folks understand well a couple of things um i i the
00:15:33.000 the premier was forced into a bit of that corner because um one of our federal ministers made the
00:15:40.780 comment that we should cut off oil exports that or you know put a tariff on our own tariff on whatever
00:15:49.620 a couple of points that are really important for everybody in this country to remember
00:15:54.780 is that oil and gas exports are a massive part of the entire canadian economy so everything that we
00:16:04.100 benefit from in terms of prosperity is significantly dependent on our oil and gas exports so this is a
00:16:11.920 canadian enterprise this is not just alberta um totally you know in a number of ways the the oil
00:16:21.480 oil industry here depends on all sorts of um manufacturing inputs service inputs from across
00:16:27.860 the country so this industry is a canadian industry and the taxes and the benefits and the economic
00:16:33.960 prosperity all actually go to all of canada and all of canadians that's something we do not talk about
00:16:40.680 enough and has to be repeated the other thing is that same minister didn't come out and say
00:16:48.040 and maybe we should put a hold on potash exports that same minister didn't come out and say we should
00:16:57.240 put a hold on auto pick your manufacturing sector into in ontario such as auto or you know auto parts
00:17:06.840 um so i recognize that sometimes things get said that are you know emotional but i will say that um
00:17:17.080 the premier of alberta really got pushed into a spot because of a federal minister picking on only
00:17:27.720 oil exports from alberta and and it came especially under the previous government after a decade of
00:17:33.960 saying we don't want your resources we don't want your pipelines etc etc and then it became we want to use
00:17:39.960 it as a bargaining chip um please let us cut off your uh your lifeblood the the the the the the nerve of
00:17:47.800 absolutely that brian um 10 years of really having a thumb on the opportunities here the prosperity here uh
00:17:57.480 the potential prosperity again not just for here but for the whole country but um and then and then turning
00:18:05.320 around and saying but we're gonna you know we're gonna use you to get to to to serve as a bargaining
00:18:11.080 chip um it was it was deeply offensive to people here and i you know you you started this by saying
00:18:17.800 you know i'm an easterner well i've been here for 12 years uh now but i do i i think of myself as a
00:18:24.200 canadian by far and away more than i think of myself as having been from ontario or being an alberton
00:18:29.960 i fit i think of myself as a canadian and i have always been a free trader i have always been and for somebody
00:18:37.560 as old as i am i'll always say it's actually a long time um uh but but but as long as i can remember
00:18:44.440 i've been a free trader for as long as i can remember i've been a big supporter of canada um embracing the fact
00:18:51.560 that we are blessed with resources of all kinds there are people around the world who literally would kill
00:18:59.480 to have the opportunities and the resources that we are blessed with in this country and we shoot
00:19:05.320 ourselves in the foot over and over um for whatever reasons i mean certainly on the on the climate piece
00:19:12.280 the the irresponsibility of of the this the most recent government and the prior government didn't
00:19:19.880 we didn't build a whole lot under that government either so this is you know i want to make that clear
00:19:24.920 but this last government the absolute irresponsibility of a federal government suggesting and implementing
00:19:33.640 policies that somehow suggested that canada could solve the global climate challenge on its own was
00:19:43.880 um well irresponsible i i it just very frustrating there were proposals put forward to help reduce global
00:19:50.520 emissions by using canadian oil and gas letting lng exports replace coal and that was laughed at uh by
00:19:59.000 by the trudeau administration oh no no we can't do that we just have to lower canada's emissions not
00:20:04.200 worry about what's happening in india and china and south korea and places that wanted our product the
00:20:09.800 focus the in there's so much ideology there and and and let me be clear about one thing um i hate it when
00:20:17.640 people say that i always try to be clear it's like let me let me be honest here well i gotta try to be all the time um
00:20:25.960 an awful lot of those people have been well-meaning an awful lot of those people are not bad people but they saw
00:20:33.800 climate as the existential challenge for the for the world and felt that canada
00:20:39.160 um had the most important thing for canada was to meet our climate goals our paris commitments
00:20:49.720 canada has never done that has never met its goals we have an unfortunate history of of having
00:20:55.640 um aspirations but never actually being able to come through and um knowing that what was happening in
00:21:03.640 china and india and in other places all around the world that somehow canada could on its own by
00:21:14.760 meeting our paris commitments have any kind of realistic impact on the global climate change
00:21:21.240 challenge was completely nonsensical and that's why i say i think you know the the politicians suggesting
00:21:28.440 that we could do that and at the expense of the canadian economy canadian prosperity was was
00:21:34.360 irresponsible um it's it's well-intentioned but we uh unfortunately have uh for 10 years been shooting
00:21:42.760 ourselves in the foot so that a few people could pat themselves on the back and what we're seeing now
00:21:48.600 is a much greater recognition ironically from one of the most vocal and influential people in the climate
00:21:57.160 change challenge uh world you're talking mark carney um you know i give him full marks for for
00:22:04.760 recognizing he's now he's now prime minister canada and as john manley likes to say and i think he's
00:22:10.280 absolutely right natural resources this is our family business and mark carney's now he's kind of the head
00:22:16.200 of the family and so his first responsibility is to this country and he's recognizing canada's not going
00:22:23.880 to solve climate change we can play our part we're still you know i was part of the pathways alliance
00:22:29.560 the the oil sands pathway pathways alliance to reduce emissions um the industry has been reducing
00:22:35.560 emissions um per barrel dramatically over the last number of years anyway um those those are really good
00:22:42.520 goals but i i give i give mark carney full credit so far because the words are right as i said earlier we
00:22:48.360 need to see the actions but um i give him full credit for being able to say um my circumstances
00:22:55.960 are this the world's circumstances have changed and we now to get need to get on with this and i
00:23:03.800 so far i'm i'm impressed i think these are these are the right things to do for the prime minister of
00:23:09.640 canada well and you're even hearing that he's saying the right things um from people like Saskatchewan
00:23:16.040 premier scott mo and from alberta premier danielle smith and i even ran into premier smith at uh
00:23:21.880 an event here at stampede and she said you know we'll see if the results turn out but so far he's
00:23:28.120 saying the right things and that gives her hope we'll take a quick pause here but when we come back
00:23:32.360 let's get into supply management because i know you have some thoughts and and so do uh the listeners
00:23:39.320 back in moments boarding for flight 246 to toronto is delayed 50 minutes uh what sounds like ojo time
00:23:46.760 play ojo great idea feel the fun with all the latest slots in live casino games and with no
00:23:51.640 wagering requirements what you win is yours to keep groovy hey i won
00:23:59.960 boarding will begin when passenger fisher is done celebrating 19 plus ontario only please play
00:24:04.520 responsibly concerned about your gambling or that of someone close to you call 1-866-531-2600 or visit
00:24:09.320 comics ontario.ca everyone's story sounds different we get it so when it comes to finding a life
00:24:16.280 insurance plan that's in tune with yours we got you cooperators financial representatives take the
00:24:21.960 time to understand your full financial picture from insurance to investments so you can get coverage
00:24:27.080 that sounds good wherever your story takes you get your whole story heard start your life
00:24:31.720 insurance conversation with a local cooperators financial representative at cooperators.ca
00:24:37.240 life insurance is underwritten by cooperators life insurance company
00:24:43.000 canada can be a global leader in reducing the harm caused by smoking but it requires actionable steps
00:24:49.720 now is the time to modernize canadian laws so that adult smokers have information and access to
00:24:55.480 better alternatives by doing so we can create lasting change if you don't smoke don't
00:25:01.560 start if you smoke quit if you don't quit change visit unsmoke.ca
00:25:09.560 this is tristan hopper the host of canada did what where we unpack the biggest weirdest and wildest
00:25:15.320 political moments in canadian history you thought you knew and tell you what really happened stick
00:25:21.000 around at the end of the episode to hear a sample of one of our favorite episodes if you don't want
00:25:25.960 to stick around make sure you subscribe to canada did what everywhere you get podcasts so just before
00:25:32.120 we entered into these new negotiations with the americans to try and get an extra a different trade
00:25:38.040 deal uh a new you smacker a new kuzma whatever you want to call it we decided to pass a bill put forward
00:25:44.360 by the leader of the separatist party uh y francois blanchet to say that canadian uh diplomats and trade
00:25:51.720 negotiators were forbidden by law from talking about supply management at all not dismantling
00:25:58.360 it but talking about it martha you know you've got a track record on supply management but my
00:26:04.440 discussions with your uh the americans including uh ambassador pete hoekstra is they don't want to get
00:26:10.600 rid of supply management but they do want greater access for their uh producers whether it's a bigger
00:26:17.800 quota or something and they just feel like we try and use supply management to block them at every turn
00:26:25.480 um do can we negotiate away some quota or should this system just be dismantled wow a lot of parts to
00:26:36.280 that um i'll take a couple of bits just one at a time so first we already have a deal with the united
00:26:45.480 states it is the usmca kuzma nafta the new nafta we have a treaty a trade deal with the united states
00:26:55.880 it is the law of both of all three countries because remember it includes mexico so it is very dangerous
00:27:02.360 to talk about negotiating a new deal or whatever because in some way like language matters in some
00:27:10.280 ways that kind of con that kind of language only feeds into donald's donald trump's view that he
00:27:15.960 can just throw it away because he can't um i mean he clearly has been throwing it away since he brought
00:27:23.800 in the tariffs on liberation day so so that said we have the realities of a president who seems to be
00:27:30.840 getting away with executive actions without the consequences and without without the enforcement of the
00:27:38.120 legal constraints that he really should be facing so there's a whole bigger question there but that is
00:27:43.960 the pragmatic that the practical challenge that we're facing now but i think it's worth repeating
00:27:49.240 that we do have a deal now now if we can just talk about that deal for a moment though like the americans
00:27:55.560 have been complaining about how we handle dairy since basically the day after the deal was signed
00:28:02.280 and the biden administration took us to trade panels twice and you know you've forgotten more
00:28:08.360 about supply management than i'll know but my understanding i was talking with sylvain charlebois
00:28:12.920 about this a little while ago and he said well the problem is the americans negotiated quota
00:28:17.640 access for their producers but the holders of that quota are canadian cheese producers like saputo or
00:28:24.680 armstrong and they just say we're not buying any of your milk and so that creates the irritant of
00:28:31.320 wait a minute we thought we had a deal and you're just still blocking us which seems like a a bad move
00:28:39.160 when you look at the totality of our trade deal so so oh there's so many parts to this so let me i
00:28:50.280 don't i don't disagree with any of that but the issue is much much larger than um some frustration that
00:28:59.320 maybe the deal wasn't clear clear enough or that the canadian side has has been not adhering to it
00:29:06.040 completely well i don't disagree with any of that but the issue is much larger and and it's not just
00:29:11.560 the americans the entire world is frustrated with canada's supply management um regime because it uh
00:29:18.920 basically enforces ridiculously high tariffs on any dairy uh poultry and egg uh imports into canada and so
00:29:27.080 that's frustrating i mean you know we're not a tiny market we're resizable and um producers around the
00:29:32.760 world get frustrated when we go to negotiate trade deals like our trade deal with europe or the trans
00:29:38.680 pacific partnership trade deal the the people are are pretty frustrated with canada because we
00:29:43.880 we say sure we'd love to have free trade but oh by the way you can't sell us any in effect you can't
00:29:49.480 sell us cheese milk yogurt you know yogurt ice cream so so it's a much larger issue parsing out
00:29:58.200 a couple of the things you said one is this new bill that is about to achieve uh to get royal assent
00:30:05.480 that was brought in in this new government as you said by the uh the the bloc quebecois and passed
00:30:11.640 unanimously though and passed unanimously in the house the last government just before the last government
00:30:19.480 um ended there was a similar bill that had been put forward by the uh the bloc quebecois that
00:30:27.160 richie and she almost i don't think it was completely unass but almost unanimous consent in the house bill
00:30:32.360 282 it then went to the senate and the senate and i want to do a shout out to a couple of senators peter
00:30:39.160 harter and peter beam who did yeoman's work in getting the senate to do what the senate is supposed to
00:30:46.520 do sober second thought the senate hearings the senate committee worked on this
00:30:52.120 had tons of investigation into the issue importantly it was not actually to be a referendum on supply
00:31:02.440 management it was the concept of carving any sector any part of our economy out of any future trade
00:31:12.280 negotiations is something no country in the world has ever done let me just say trade negotiation means
00:31:20.040 negotiation and this as soon as you say oh but we'll negotiate everything except for that piece
00:31:27.480 destroys the concept and so many of us who appeared before the senate on this said this is not if you did
00:31:33.640 this on the auto sector if you did this on steel and aluminum we would say we would say the same thing
00:31:39.160 you must not carve out a sector from trade negotiations because then you've tied you've
00:31:45.320 really tied you know one hand behind your back so this is a nuance it's really important to understand
00:31:52.360 this new bill came in virtually the same and i have to say the senators that i've spoken to um have
00:32:00.680 did not do it again because their view was at a certain point the senate does have to respect what
00:32:07.080 they see as the will of the people if the house of commons completely abrogated any responsibility
00:32:13.240 for appropriate committee hearings on this bill is the house of commons's fault and we as canadians
00:32:18.360 have to be critical of that but i can understand you know the senate works so hard to deal with 282
00:32:25.160 that it just it the the will was not there to do it on this bill so this bill is going to pass you've
00:32:30.920 got every party and every mp that's voting saying they're backing this why the stranglehold you know
00:32:37.720 i was talking to some um farmers in saskatchewan the other day and they they just blame quebec and
00:32:45.240 it's quebec farmers and there's a bit of truth to that i think parts of ontario and and and their
00:32:50.040 pockets i mean look there's a very strong dairy lobby in in alberta too there are a small number of very
00:32:56.040 wealthy um dairy farmers here now the the entire entire country um when supply management was brought
00:33:04.360 in there were about 145 000 dairy farmers across the country and there were real issues in terms of
00:33:10.760 price volatility um etc the supply less than 10 000 and now it's probably about 8 000 they are all
00:33:18.840 multi-millionaires even the small small you know 70 head farms in quebec um they're all multi-millionaires
00:33:29.720 the challenge here and and they are so because of the extraordinarily high prices that we charge uh
00:33:35.480 that that we end up paying as consumers in canada it's the the best way for me to describe it for
00:33:41.160 listeners it's the three legs of a stool and this come brings it back to the trade discussions supply
00:33:47.160 management is a cartel it's a legislated cartel so you know we we say any other cartels are illegal
00:33:54.200 because they're bad but this one is sanctioned um historically you know might have been a reason
00:33:59.240 for it does not stand the test of analysis anymore you can't really say that we're doing this to keep
00:34:06.680 the small family dairy farm going when we've gone from over a hundred thousand to on you know
00:34:12.520 i think charlebois says nine you say eight it's under ten now it's it's definitely under ten now um
00:34:18.600 and and that's exactly one of the arguments well it protects the family farm absolute nonsense in fact
00:34:25.960 um uh the rate of consolidation in the last number of decades in dairy and poultry and eggs has been
00:34:33.880 higher than virtually other every other agricultural sector in canada so one could actually say it has
00:34:40.680 hurt right the the maintenance of of the family farm but if i can just the the three legs of the
00:34:47.320 stool because people say to me i don't i don't understand supply management the three legs of the
00:34:52.280 stool are you have price setting by the dairy commissions the federal provincial um and that
00:34:59.480 they're made up of dairy farmers no conflict of interest there um so you have them set prices
00:35:05.480 they set their prices based on if you've ever worked in construction or had to you know get
00:35:09.320 construction work it's like it's cost plus right um so there's no there's no there's not a lot of
00:35:16.760 incentive for for uh figuring out how to be more efficient on the on the costs um so you have price
00:35:23.480 fixing the the prices are fixed by the producers themselves so as i said um clear conflict of interest
00:35:30.520 the other the second leg of the stool is that any industry if you say it's all cost plus and you've got
00:35:37.240 your fixed prices you're gonna get a lot of people wanting to get into that industry it's like
00:35:41.880 handing out mcdonald's franchises for free um that's you're gonna get an awful lot of people wanting to
00:35:47.960 set up mcdonald's well that ultimately doesn't work it's not tenable so there's a quota system so to keep
00:35:54.360 the limit the number of producers limited you establish a quota basically how much milk can that farmer produce
00:36:03.240 right well the third leg of the stool is and the quota ends up being really valuable it's a little
00:36:11.400 bit like a mcdonald's franchise fee right if you want to run a mcdonald's you have to pay an awful
00:36:16.040 lot of money for the privilege up front you have to pay an awful lot of money for the privilege of
00:36:20.840 having quota up front so you know in some parts of the country quota is worth 45 000 a cow and that
00:36:27.400 doesn't include the value of the cow in some places it's fixed at 25 000 worth per cow but you get the
00:36:35.400 drift right there's there's a lot of money involved here the third leg of the stool is that if you will
00:36:42.120 have artificially higher prices in canada because of the first two legs of the stool which you do
00:36:49.560 you can't let cheaper you know world market products come into the country because it will
00:36:58.600 completely undermine the system right if you allowed american yogurt at a third of the price of what we
00:37:06.360 pay for your yogurt here in canada well guess what's going to happen everybody's going to buy american
00:37:12.360 yogurt right well can you speak to uh this claim that i hear on a regular basis and and that is
00:37:19.160 that again even if we just allow a little bit more american product in um supply management
00:37:25.880 protects us from those evil americans with their chemical filled products and their bovine growth 0.95
00:37:30.520 hormones yeah this is just drives me crazy this but this is what i get and and what's what's amazing
00:37:37.000 is that it's not true it goes across partisan lines this is not one party or another it goes across
00:37:43.000 and people think that supply management is there to protect us from inferior product talk to any baker
00:37:50.360 about butter in canada versus butter from other countries and you will get a rant about how our product
00:37:56.200 is not superior on that front but it's an awful lot more expensive yes um uh ironically australia
00:38:03.640 and new zealand both had supply management in their dairy sectors many years ago the new zealand's
00:38:09.800 less of a good example australia was very similar to ours and um you know you talked earlier about
00:38:16.120 being right next door to a an economic powerhouse australia is really close to china and it was
00:38:24.360 recognizing that its economy needed to become a lot more competitive in the early 2000s they implemented
00:38:30.920 policies to and to actually ensure australian uh well the whole economy it wasn't just dairy but the
00:38:38.360 whole economy become much more competitive as part of that they actually got rid of supply management
00:38:44.040 the australian dairy industry is now one of the most um lucrative powerful industries in canada
00:38:50.600 in the world new zealand does really well too you'll hear you know canadian farmers saying well the
00:38:56.040 climate's different and honestly it drives me crazy because some of this is all just um uh i i wanted
00:39:06.280 i don't want to say nonsense because that's a little harsh and i don't want to be flippant these are not
00:39:12.120 truths the how can we get rid of it though and so here's the thing um what the opportunity and and
00:39:19.400 so just to complete the picture of the three stools sorry brian but what that means to prevent low
00:39:26.840 cost product from coming in we have tariffs on um milk dairy products poultry eggs for anyone any other
00:39:38.600 producing country in the world including the united states of up to almost 300 percent that is to make
00:39:46.280 sure that we don't get that cheaper product coming in because you add the tariff on and then it becomes
00:39:52.440 comparable in term in price so you know for we basically we basically have built a wall around
00:39:59.160 canada the response from the rest of the world is well you can't sell us your dairy because you know you 0.98
00:40:07.240 that's how the w the world trade organization rules work you can't you can't suck and blow you can't 0.97
00:40:13.560 keep yours protected and then come in and sell in on ours the other challenge is because we've made
00:40:18.520 ours so expensive there isn't a market in internationally because it just that we can't
00:40:23.880 compete which is such a shame because we have you know we have in nova scotia let me just pick on
00:40:28.680 nova scotia there is a really fantastic cheese um artisanal cheese manufacturing sector in nova
00:40:36.040 scotia for example but that stuff is so expensive it wins global awards some of those cheeses and
00:40:41.880 quebec too ontario other parts of the country but they but they're limited to the canadian market
00:40:47.640 which is a real shame so there's a lancaster cheddar from lancaster in ontario that won
00:40:52.360 world's top cheddar a few years ago yes and the rest of the world doesn't know it because they
00:40:56.760 they can't and you can barely get it in canada well there you go so so let me go back to if i can to
00:41:03.160 the opportunity um a couple of big dairy companies in canada one is a cooperative owned by the irony
00:41:11.880 here just kills me owned by quebec dairy farmers agripoor now produces more american milk than it
00:41:19.400 than than produces canadian milk because they bought into american dairy because they knew that if they
00:41:26.520 wanted to expand into other markets which most successful businesses see as opportunities they
00:41:33.640 had to actually go outside of canada and set up shop in in agripoor's case in the united states what
00:41:42.040 really is frustrating about that is that that the quebec dairy farmers that own it they keep their wealth
00:41:47.320 in terms of the canadian market with inflated prices um but for the agripoor the company to process
00:41:55.240 to go into the united states and process more american milk than canadian milk those are american
00:42:00.600 jobs not canadian jobs so we've in effect exported jobs into other markets saputo is a quebec company
00:42:09.960 quebec dairy company it's one of the largest dairy companies in the world has massive operations in
00:42:15.000 in australia and elsewhere for the same reason so you know good on them that's fantastic but we make good
00:42:22.440 milk here we could be making a lot more milk here for those export markets but we can't because of
00:42:28.760 the rules because of this very inward looking we need to protect our our cozy little arrangement here
00:42:36.440 at all costs the key is we could do this australia got rid of supply management as i said that industry
00:42:44.120 is now one of the world's best we do it if we were going to do it how would it happen because one of
00:42:48.840 the another argument i hear is well the banks have so much money tied up in loans for the quota right
00:42:55.720 that it would be too expensive or if you just you know didn't compensate for the loans for the quota
00:43:02.120 that uh you would effectively take a real hit for the banks no so so here's this is what australia did
00:43:09.800 i mean the first premise is you can't jeopardize the farmers and the producers who based on having quota
00:43:19.400 borrowed borrowed borrowed money to build barns borrowed money you know you we you can't do that
00:43:24.600 that's unfair so how do you compensate the existing quota holders in a way that uh allows them to not
00:43:35.640 you know be be uh jeopardized financially but in a way that also doesn't cost a canadian taxpayer
00:43:43.160 billions of dollars now you hear the number floating around if you just multiply that the quota number by
00:43:48.120 number of cows you know 30 billion dollars it's not that much we've i've i've done a lot of work on
00:43:54.200 this we had an mpp student from the school of public policy do some fantastic work he graduated i guess
00:44:00.840 two years ago now um some fantastic work uh with much uh more updated numbers the number would
00:44:08.600 probably be about eight billion in that range now that's not chump change that's a lot of money 1.00
00:44:15.880 especially at a time when canada's making a whole lot of financial commitments on military and various
00:44:20.600 other things but what australia did and this was the genius of the australian approach and remember this
00:44:27.000 was not australia just focusing on dairy this was australia recognizing it needed to be a lot more
00:44:32.200 competitive it had big economies around it growing like china oh does that not sound familiar that maybe
00:44:38.360 this is a moment in time for canada to actually in all of its sectors become more competitive but on
00:44:43.880 dairy what the australians did is they used the system itself to build the fund that actually paid
00:44:51.720 out the quota for the farmers and so over the course of it was either 20 or 25 years they said
00:45:01.080 they determined what the number was that would have to make the farmers whole
00:45:05.960 they then said okay x say 10 10 billion it wasn't 10 billion but for the sake of of argument if they
00:45:12.200 said 10 billion dollars was what they were going to need to make the farmers whole basically paying
00:45:18.200 out their quota and making sure that they could get stick you know get more on their feet to be able
00:45:22.280 to compete internationally um if and you that's hard because on a podcast you can't see my hands but i'm i'm
00:45:29.560 if you say the the uh supply managed price was 10 bucks the uh world market price was five dollars
00:45:40.440 they increased the cost of a liter per milk a liter of milk by 11 cents from the world from the five
00:45:50.120 dollars so five dollars plus 11 cents those numbers are not real but the 11 cents is but
00:45:55.880 i'm trying to do the graphics here um for that 11 cents per liter produced for 20 years was the source of
00:46:05.880 the of the of the of the money to build the fund to buy the farmers out so yes did it cost
00:46:12.200 consume so it wasn't a cross taxpayer base it was consumers but the consumers if they didn't do the
00:46:18.280 consumers were still going to be paying 10 bucks if the consumers were paying five plus that was still
00:46:23.800 better than paying 10 bucks and over 20 years that actually managed to ensure that the uh farmers in
00:46:31.560 australia were made whole economically did everyone stay in the industry did everyone
00:46:37.000 manage to to sort of rally to this and compete no some of the dairy farmers in australia sold out to
00:46:42.520 others there was some consolidation that's not a bad thing like i said the australian industry is now
00:46:48.680 a powerhouse globally which has benefited the australian dairy sector like it's been it's an opportunity for
00:46:56.680 canada so for me it's not we need to get rid of supply management because supply management is bad
00:47:02.440 and you know it's it's made a small very small number of people ultra wealthy at the cost of
00:47:07.320 consumers which is true but it's also a shame because we are depriving our own dairy farmers
00:47:15.640 and the dairy sector and the producers from using more canadian production building canadian jobs to be
00:47:22.520 able to participate in the global marketplace but i but i will say fundamentally the lobby the dairy
00:47:29.640 lobby so if you're if you're spending 100 200 million dollars a year and you know just by if you
00:47:35.880 add how much a billboard costs and a tv ad costs and how much the milk insignia on the toronto make
00:47:41.400 on the leaves jersey yeah it's too bad probably you know would have been more more costly if it had
00:47:46.280 been the others but anyway um those are all that's really expensive i mean when i was first first
00:47:51.480 doing my work on this the the the understanding it was well over a hundred million dollars a year
00:47:56.840 of marketing well that's you and i are paying for that right because of our inflated dairy 0.99
00:48:02.440 poultry and egg prices but the people who benefit from that the lobbyists the marketing people the ad
00:48:10.600 campaign people they all have a vested interest in having the dairy farmers themselves believe that supply
00:48:20.280 management is is sacred and they also have a vested interest in making sure because the you know the
00:48:28.440 dairy farmers will spout these lines even if they're not true but they've been told them
00:48:33.240 there are some dairy farmers by the way who behind the scenes are actively working to get
00:48:37.320 rid of supply management for these very reasons because they understand what what they're missing but
00:48:41.880 they have to be extremely quiet about this because uh it's a it's a it's it's a tough um there are
00:48:48.520 people who are very very strongly intent on keeping this system because they benefit so much from it
00:48:55.640 um but then they also that's the by far the most active lobby on parliament hill um so even though
00:49:03.080 behind the scenes many of those politicians who voted for that bill agree that supply management needs to go
00:49:10.920 they vote for it because they say they don't have the votes and the vet the industry the lobby
00:49:20.200 has a vested interest in making sure that those politicians continue to believe that there are simply too
00:49:28.200 much too many votes in support of supply management so we need the canadian public to understand the
00:49:34.040 realities of this much much more if i can right now every other sector in this country automotive
00:49:45.080 whether you know the big three auto parts canola uh um beef beef aluminum steel all of the aluminum and
00:49:56.120 steel industry in canada is now under tariffs and they are suffering part of the reason is that we have
00:50:07.080 this extraordinary need somehow to protect supply management but the cost what do we give up what
00:50:15.160 does every other sector give up if we were able to say that the americans yeah i think you're absolutely
00:50:23.160 right they're not saying get rid of supply management they just want greater some greater
00:50:27.480 access to the to the country's market um but we need to get rid of supply management for canada's sake
00:50:34.760 not for donald trump but right now because we are holding on to it so dearly every other
00:50:42.440 the negotiation on every other economic sector is harmed well i'm sure you've heard from the same people
00:50:49.160 i have who have been part of the past negotiations in the last trump administration and are being
00:50:55.480 consulted now from various industries they they will tell you straight up maybe not on the record
00:51:01.560 but they will tell you straight up that the dairy lobby could scupper the entire deal uh and and hurt
00:51:09.560 every other industry well this recent bill um is is hugely problematic even as i said before even if it
00:51:16.840 weren't dairy um excluding any economic sector from trade negotiations is a problem but are keeping
00:51:24.120 supply management as a as a system absolutely i mean you i'm look i'm i'm in western canada the beef
00:51:30.760 farmers the canola people the everybody the the corn people in ontario corn farmers who have expanded
00:51:37.960 into the united states simply because they can't afford the the acreage in ontario because of the
00:51:44.920 the inflated costs of that acreage because of the the um artificial wealth of the of the dairy
00:51:50.280 industry i mean i'll say something that's not popular though isn't canada overall a protectionist
00:51:55.400 country while we scream about the americans and tariffs and and different things beyond supply
00:52:01.720 management we protect our banks we protect our telcos our media companies and it's a long list of
00:52:08.920 um thou shalt not trade in this well foreign ownership restrictions are a bit different i mean
00:52:16.120 there's there's nothing to prevent verizon from coming in and and setting up shop in canada we
00:52:20.600 don't we don't prevent there are lots of banks that come into canada and operate what we do restrict
00:52:26.280 is ownership in those in those companies and that's a much different conversation um it nothing compares to
00:52:35.080 this extraordinary artificial the sanction cartel that continues with supply management my hope brian
00:52:42.920 is that that what's happening with donald trump and the americans and and let's face it there are a lot
00:52:48.840 of people behind trump who also i mean supply management was a frustration for obama was a frustration
00:52:55.000 for biden it was a frustration for you know it's been a frustration for for decades um the the challenge
00:53:01.880 here is we need the other economic sectors in this country to be very firm with our politicians to
00:53:08.760 say enough is enough we know that there's actually real benefits to getting rid of supply management
00:53:15.720 for canada for canadian consumers and ironically for the canadian dairy poultry and egg sectors in
00:53:22.200 terms of potential global opportunities but we're ignoring those and hurting all of our sectors in
00:53:30.600 all of these trade negotiations so you know where are they we need them to step up we need the canola
00:53:37.160 farmers we need the bee farmers we need aluminum steel we need the auto auto parts sector people to
00:53:44.200 be making these these noises with our canadian politicians because if they don't speak up the
00:53:50.520 canadian politicians will continue to be under this frustrating belief that somehow those dairy votes are more
00:53:58.280 important than every other economic sector in this country martha all finley thanks so much oh my
00:54:04.440 pleasure full comment is a post media podcast my name is brian lilly your host this episode was produced
00:54:10.920 by andre prue theme music by bryce hall kevin libban is the executive producer remember to hit subscribe
00:54:17.000 like leave a comment or review wherever you're getting your podcast whether it's on amazon apple spotify
00:54:22.040 what have you help us out leave us that review and spread the word thanks for listening until next time i'm brian lilly
00:54:32.680 here's that clip from canada did what i promised you
00:54:39.480 so um although although abortion was sort of accessible it really wasn't but then 1988 rolls around
00:54:49.400 and what's the law on abortion then suddenly there wasn't one literally no restrictions existed in
00:54:56.840 1988 abortion went from heavily restricted to completely unrestricted almost overnight there was no
00:55:04.760 referendum on this there wasn't even an act of parliament this whole thing is due to a somewhat
00:55:10.200 surprised decision out of the supreme court of canada and it came about in large part because of one
00:55:15.800 man a canadian doctor who had been relentless about running illegal abortion clinics since the 1960s
00:55:21.960 and was determined to overturn the laws prohibiting the practice along the way he endured multiple
00:55:27.880 arrests constant raids a jail term a firebombing of his clinic an attack by a fanatic wielding garden
00:55:33.240 shears the approbation of virtually his entire profession and frequent death threats
00:55:38.680 if you want to hear the rest of the story make sure you subscribe to canada did what everywhere you get
00:55:47.480 your podcasts