Full Comment - November 17, 2025


Conservatives lived through this same party drama before and emerged victorious


Episode Stats

Length

48 minutes

Words per Minute

192.7252

Word Count

9,380

Sentence Count

616

Misogynist Sentences

8

Hate Speech Sentences

6


Summary

Former Chief of Staff to Prime Minister Stephen Harper, Ian Brody talks about dealing with floor crossers in the early days of the Conservative Party of Canada and what it was like to be part of a government with a minority government.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 As I've said before, well, Parliament Hill can be a bit like high school with salaries.
00:00:06.760 There's a lot of gossip, there's a lot of drama, and it's never ending, especially if
00:00:11.020 your name is Pierre Paulyevre and the Conservative Party of Canada.
00:00:14.440 Hello, welcome to the Full Comment Podcast.
00:00:16.580 My name's Brian Lilly, your host.
00:00:18.000 We've been talking about this issue for a couple of weeks now.
00:00:21.320 The floor crosser that happened on the day of the budget, Chris Dantremont, Matt Genreux
00:00:25.480 resigning or announcing that he would resign at a later date to be confirmed.
00:00:30.000 From the Conservative Party of Canada, lots of speculation about more floor crossers,
00:00:34.740 now speculation about whether Pierre Paulyevre can survive his leadership.
00:00:38.600 A headline in a column in the Toronto Sun by Amanda Galbraith says,
00:00:42.840 Pierre Paulyevre's Conservatives don't need a new leader, just a Valium.
00:00:48.420 Let's talk about this in depth with someone who knows what it's like to come close to winning
00:00:54.700 power, dealing with floor crossers, eventually getting power.
00:00:58.780 And that is Ian Brody.
00:01:00.260 He is the former Chief of Staff to Prime Minister Stephen Harper.
00:01:03.560 He's been an academic at the University of Waterloo, the Calgary School of Public Policy.
00:01:08.600 He's now with U.S. Public Affairs and joins me now in studio in Toronto.
00:01:12.820 Ian, great to see you again.
00:01:14.360 Good to see you, Brian.
00:01:15.040 I couldn't think of somebody better to talk about this than you, because when you look
00:01:20.800 at what has happened to Pierre Paulyevre over the last little bit, I was like, well, you
00:01:26.860 kind of went through this with Stephen Harper.
00:01:28.740 I went through that, yes.
00:01:29.160 We went through this.
00:01:29.840 So give people a bit of background.
00:01:31.140 You were an academic who decided, well, let's go test these theories I've got, and went into
00:01:38.940 active politics with Stephen Harper when?
00:01:42.300 Was it 2003, 2004?
00:01:43.960 Spring of 2003.
00:01:45.780 So he was still leader of the Canadian Alliance at that point.
00:01:50.320 So you joined him post-leadership?
00:01:52.700 Post the first, yeah, that's right.
00:01:54.180 Yes, that's right.
00:01:54.800 I mean, I had known Mr. Harper for several years before that, but when I went, and you
00:02:01.260 know, you talk about motivation, at that point, the objective was just to hold the party together
00:02:07.360 to not fall apart until we could get to an election campaign.
00:02:12.760 Kretchen had won three big majorities in a row.
00:02:15.640 They were still division between the Canadian Alliance and the PC party.
00:02:19.360 I'd been working on the ground in by-election in Perth Middlesex, leading up to moving to
00:02:24.700 Ottawa.
00:02:25.560 The PC party came from behind and won that by-election after the Alliance had poured
00:02:30.880 a lot of money and a lot of effort into it.
00:02:33.240 And so at that point, the idea was really just, can we keep the place from falling apart
00:02:38.660 long enough to fight an election campaign?
00:02:40.980 And things turned out a little bit better than that, but that was the vibe that we had
00:02:46.000 at the time when I moved there in 2003.
00:02:47.680 So 2004, the Conservative Party and the PC party have merged.
00:02:55.600 That's right.
00:02:56.040 Stephen Harper is leader, runs for, in the 2004 election against Paul Martin, loses.
00:03:02.860 Some mistakes could have gone another way.
00:03:05.860 Yes, that's right.
00:03:06.700 And then you were facing issues about, you know, can the party stay together again?
00:03:13.040 Spring 2005, you thought you were going to defeat the government.
00:03:17.300 And then there was, ta-da, a floor crosser.
00:03:20.720 So what was it like back then dealing with, you know, both Belinda Stronick crossing the
00:03:26.560 floor, Chuck Cadman standing up to vote to save the government, all of those things?
00:03:32.480 Yeah.
00:03:32.920 I mean, it was...
00:03:34.940 You're rubbing your eyes.
00:03:36.680 And I'm guessing...
00:03:37.180 I have to take me back to your tough days of...
00:03:40.500 Bad headaches.
00:03:41.080 Tough days of...
00:03:41.800 Yeah, some days of some rough headaches.
00:03:46.460 You know, the 2004 campaign for the Conservatives was winnable.
00:03:49.740 I guess we consoled ourselves that going into that election, Martin's people sort of advertised
00:03:54.860 they were expecting to win 250 seats.
00:03:56.580 They wanted to win...
00:03:56.940 There's a whole book about it called Juggernaut.
00:03:58.580 Yeah.
00:03:58.820 I was like reminding everyone that they were going to win the biggest majority ever, is what
00:04:03.400 they said.
00:04:04.000 Yes.
00:04:04.500 And they got a minority.
00:04:05.960 Yes.
00:04:06.220 I have a remaindered copy of Juggernaut, and I left on the cover of the $1.99, you know,
00:04:11.700 price tag.
00:04:13.580 We won't name the author, but from time to time, when I ran into her, I reminded her that
00:04:17.360 I got the book on sale.
00:04:19.960 So we consoled ourselves with having reduced Martin to a minority.
00:04:24.620 I think that wasn't an accomplishment, but, you know, victories within reach, and it kind
00:04:29.660 of fell apart at the last minute.
00:04:32.420 But I would say it took Mr. Harper and the team probably a year to get over that.
00:04:38.360 It was really kind of losing an election that you think you have a good chance of winning
00:04:42.880 is tough.
00:04:44.780 Now, I'm going off memory.
00:04:45.920 I think the election was spring 2004, right?
00:04:48.780 Around May.
00:04:48.940 It was June of 2004.
00:04:50.000 June, okay.
00:04:50.580 Yeah, called in May for June.
00:04:52.200 And so we were just starting to kind of get our feet underneath ourselves again when,
00:04:57.460 as you say, you know, Harper had gone out of his way to court the NDP, had gone out of
00:05:03.540 his way to consolidate all the opposition parties against Martin, had deliberately not
00:05:09.160 polarized the electorate in order to drive, you know, keep New Democrats voting NDP instead
00:05:13.760 of driving them into the Liberal Party.
00:05:15.540 And we thought we'd put together the parliamentary coalition to defeat the government, the Martin
00:05:20.360 government, in June.
00:05:22.260 And as you say, Belinda Strana crossed the floor, and there were some other developments
00:05:25.560 we lost.
00:05:26.500 We lost the vote by the narrowest of margins.
00:05:28.740 And that was, I was at home that morning that she crossed the floor.
00:05:33.140 I was on paternity leave because our daughter had just been born.
00:05:35.540 And we were supposed to have, Mrs. Harper was supposed to come over that day to see the
00:05:40.360 baby.
00:05:41.380 And my wife came to my wife in the shower.
00:05:43.400 She said, Lorraine can't come.
00:05:45.360 She's got Peter McKay on the other phone.
00:05:48.000 Belinda's crossed the floor.
00:05:48.940 It's over.
00:05:50.040 You probably go downtown.
00:05:51.880 And I thought, this is terrible.
00:05:54.140 I pretty much concluded this was terrible news.
00:05:56.740 And then, you know, you walk into a caucus meeting and people are like, she's abandoned
00:06:01.480 us.
00:06:01.840 Why?
00:06:02.100 And the party, which had been a bit, you know, it was new, bolted together, kind of
00:06:08.560 Frankenstein's monster at a certain point, kind of congealed in hostility to her crossing
00:06:14.660 the floor.
00:06:16.000 It turned out to be the caucus meeting was quite, I don't want to say upbeat, but was
00:06:21.540 quite focused on the task ahead.
00:06:24.900 It wasn't doom and gloom.
00:06:27.020 Absolutely not.
00:06:27.760 As you probably expected going in.
00:06:28.760 No, that's right.
00:06:29.340 No, that's right.
00:06:29.980 And Mr. Harper had warned people that he thought that Belinda would cross the floor in advance.
00:06:34.940 So that helped, you know, he had sort of set the scene for this in advance.
00:06:39.900 But the people-
00:06:40.440 He had picked up on it or?
00:06:42.340 Yeah.
00:06:42.700 He sort of had this sense that something else was going on.
00:06:47.240 He could, I don't think he had a very, I don't think he had any definitive evidence
00:06:51.160 of that, but he had the idea-
00:06:52.340 He had a gut check.
00:06:53.360 Absolutely.
00:06:53.760 And so he told several people he thought she might go.
00:06:57.980 And so when she ended up going, the people that supported her during the previous leadership
00:07:01.880 race, you know, they'd supported her because they were opposed to Harper.
00:07:05.320 You know, I mean, there's a coalition around her, not particularly because of her, but to
00:07:08.900 stop him.
00:07:09.460 And they gave that up that day, pretty much.
00:07:13.880 It was quite a remarkable caucus meeting, I remember.
00:07:15.860 And then the summer was a summer of changes.
00:07:21.180 Negotiations with the PCs, big change in-
00:07:24.460 Overhaul in the office, overhaul of the campaign team, overhaul of the policy team.
00:07:34.660 Some older PC hands came in.
00:07:37.800 Some folks from provincial politics came in.
00:07:40.240 So by September, there was a new team.
00:07:42.760 And at the end of November of that year, we succeeded in toppling the government and pushed
00:07:47.880 for the Christmas election.
00:07:49.300 Before we get to that, I just want to ask you about something that I recall happening.
00:07:53.280 And that is that there was a confidence vote that the Martin government lost in the spring
00:07:59.660 of 2005, and they just ignored it.
00:08:03.580 Yeah.
00:08:04.440 Was that a legit confidence vote, or was it too cute by half?
00:08:09.180 At the time, I was upset because I thought it was pretty clear cut.
00:08:13.300 In retrospect, you look back and think, if you're going to precipitate an election campaign,
00:08:17.740 it really has to be on something that's pretty definitively a confidence vote.
00:08:21.540 So this was someone had moved an amendment to a committee report that was being voted on.
00:08:31.480 And so that wasn't clean enough.
00:08:33.820 So you won that vote, but then lost.
00:08:37.820 There was a straight up and down confidence motion that you lost because of Belinda crossing
00:08:42.340 the floor and Chuck Cadman standing up in his jeans.
00:08:45.080 And then by the fall, things were good, and Stephen Harper won.
00:08:54.300 So what's your advice looking at what Pierre Polyev's doing?
00:08:59.220 And we haven't actually talked about this.
00:09:01.800 I don't know how close you are with Pierre.
00:09:03.420 I know you know him.
00:09:04.920 I don't know if you chat with him and his team, but if you were chatting with them now,
00:09:11.060 what would you be saying in light of Chris Dantremont crossing the floor and Matt Jenneru
00:09:16.580 with this weird resignation thing happening?
00:09:20.680 It's advice I've given to a number of party leaders in similar types of situations.
00:09:26.200 There's two things that in the media circuit we want to comment on that, nonetheless, you
00:09:32.960 should not overreact to.
00:09:35.180 One is the string of by-election losses.
00:09:38.120 You know, you get into a party, you lose a couple of by-elections in a row, but it's
00:09:41.520 like, oh my God, we've lost two or three by-elections in a row, the sky's falling in.
00:09:46.300 Don't overreact to by-elections.
00:09:47.820 Whether you win them or lose them, they're sui generis.
00:09:50.400 There are particular cases that may have no bearing on the next election campaign.
00:09:54.220 And the other thing is a floor crossing.
00:09:56.880 One floor crossing, you never know.
00:10:00.260 It's a mix of personal animus, some enticements offered by the other side.
00:10:07.420 Somebody's in a weak situation and they're riding, maybe they're getting pressure from
00:10:10.520 family or whatever.
00:10:12.300 Look, I was sad to see Chris Dantremont cross the floor.
00:10:15.680 I know Chris and he's a decent guy.
00:10:17.580 I was sad to see him go, but again, like don't overreact to a single floor crossing.
00:10:20.580 Um, if there are others, uh, that's a more serious, uh, situation, but one I don't think
00:10:26.460 is, uh, you know, don't, don't make any rash decisions based on a single floor crossing.
00:10:32.160 I mean, if the liberals did when you recruited, uh, recruited Wajid Khan.
00:10:37.760 Yes.
00:10:38.240 Um, and, and right now there's an awful lot of people listening who are saying, who is
00:10:42.980 Wajid Khan?
00:10:44.100 Yes.
00:10:44.540 Yes.
00:10:45.140 Who was Wajid Khan?
00:10:46.100 And yet I remember, uh, well, uh, there was him, there was the gentleman from Thunder
00:10:51.280 Bay, Joe.
00:10:52.520 Joe Kamuzzi.
00:10:53.420 Joe Kamuzzi.
00:10:53.980 Yes.
00:10:54.360 I mean, I remember standing in the foyer, the house of commons is a very, um, you know,
00:11:00.740 happy Stephen Harper looking like the, the cat that ate the canary welcoming these people
00:11:05.900 into his party, but in the grand scheme of things, again, don't overreact.
00:11:09.660 It didn't amount to much, did it?
00:11:11.700 No, Joe Kamuzzi was a great guy, but, uh, don't, you know, uh, he was at the end of his
00:11:15.720 political career.
00:11:16.660 Uh, he was making a move just before the election campaign, you know, uh, a great guy.
00:11:21.200 I was happy to have him on the team, but, uh, again, I hope the liberals didn't, uh, overreact
00:11:26.220 to that.
00:11:26.440 David Emerson was a worse, uh, loss, uh, for them and a bigger pickup for, uh, for the conservatives.
00:11:32.500 We can go into that if you want.
00:11:33.320 But, um, well, let's talk about that because I was at Rideau Hall, uh, believe it was February
00:11:40.640 4th, 2006.
00:11:42.820 Yes.
00:11:43.200 The 20th anniversary is coming up.
00:11:44.660 February 6th.
00:11:45.160 I just got sent, uh, a notice that you guys are having a big party on that day.
00:11:50.560 Um, and so the, uh, we're all assembled, uh, at Rideau Hall as the media is to cover the
00:11:59.300 swearing in of the new cabinet.
00:12:00.640 And David Emerson shows up who has been the liberal trade minister.
00:12:04.620 Now I, I never looked at David Emerson as a particularly liberal guy or a particularly
00:12:09.400 conservative guy.
00:12:10.480 He was a bureaucrat for a time who just wanted to serve his country.
00:12:14.760 Yeah.
00:12:15.360 So, I mean, it was a good pickup for you, but most of these are not as significant as
00:12:19.920 that or as consequential as Belinda Strawn at crossing the floor to save the day in a vote.
00:12:25.440 So, Chris D'Entremont, you know, compared to those two, kind of small potatoes.
00:12:31.580 Uh, yeah.
00:12:32.140 I mean, David Emerson was a big deal because one, he's just a uber confident cabinet minister.
00:12:36.500 And, and as you recall, um, um, uh, was, was the liberal industry minister, went to trade
00:12:43.980 for us.
00:12:44.700 And then when Maxime Bernier blew up his career as foreign minister, stepped into the foreign
00:12:49.780 minister job.
00:12:50.820 And it's hard to imagine somebody else who could have handled that situation better than
00:12:54.640 David.
00:12:55.080 So we were lucky to have him.
00:12:56.440 But at the same time, taking David, uh, from the liberal side, it was the end of the kind
00:13:01.580 of the business guy's wing of the BC federal liberal party.
00:13:04.820 And in fact, they've never recovered from that.
00:13:06.540 They kind of, that kind of liberal party connection to the Vancouver business community had never
00:13:11.720 recovered from David crossing the floor.
00:13:13.980 Um, at the time I knew that that was a possibility.
00:13:16.540 It was one of the reasons why I was eager to have David.
00:13:18.660 I found out later that he was a competent guy.
00:13:21.320 But at the time I thought, yes, if we, if we entice him across the floor, that leaves,
00:13:25.580 you know, Hedy Fry will be the senior liberal in British Columbia.
00:13:27.920 And I like that situation for the conservatives, uh, with all great respect to Dr. Fry.
00:13:32.500 Um, and, uh, so that was, but that was uniquely consequential.
00:13:36.720 Uh, I don't know whether Don Tamar is going to play, you never know, uh, whether this is
00:13:40.400 going to play a big, uh, uh, a big role in the future or not.
00:13:43.280 More difficult is when several people go to create kind of a dissident caucus, which has
00:13:47.780 happened a couple of times, uh, in, uh, politics.
00:13:50.960 My friend Monty Solberg was part of that against, uh, Stockwell Day.
00:13:54.660 I don't really think of that as a floor crossing so much as going to, uh, create a new political
00:13:59.160 party or a new, uh, Monty Solberg and Chuck Strahl and several, I think there were a dozen
00:14:06.480 of them that formed what they call them that Democratic representative caucus.
00:14:11.300 Yeah.
00:14:11.580 And, and they, they, they sat on their own.
00:14:14.300 Um, do you, you know, I'm having some people whisper to me that they think that's going to
00:14:20.040 happen with, uh, Polly Eve and the conservatives.
00:14:22.620 I haven't seen any evidence of that.
00:14:25.180 Um, but maybe people are only the people who are talking to me are only the ones who are
00:14:30.200 loyal to the leader.
00:14:32.100 Um, but I've spoken to conservative MPs in the past couple of weeks that I don't normally
00:14:37.360 speak to.
00:14:38.180 Uh, and I'm not picking up that there's going to be another bunch crossing or a, a group
00:14:46.140 go sit as their own rump and, and leave the party.
00:14:49.980 The closest I've heard, and it's all from liberals, uh, is that they will feed you names
00:14:54.400 like Michael Chon is crossing the floor.
00:14:56.280 Michael Chon is not going to be a liberal.
00:14:58.480 It's not going to happen.
00:15:00.240 Um, or, you know, one name that they floated to me, I talked to the MP, he said, I don't
00:15:04.580 know why my name keeps coming up in the mix.
00:15:06.820 I haven't even talked to any of them.
00:15:08.480 Right.
00:15:09.000 Uh, and, and, you know, you can get a sense when someone is telling you the truth or BSing
00:15:13.700 you and appears to be telling me the truth.
00:15:16.200 But have you heard about any of this?
00:15:18.820 Um, you know, one liberal was saying, well, there's a group of conservatives that won't
00:15:22.560 cross the floor, but we'll vote for the budget.
00:15:25.660 Are you picking up any of this chatter?
00:15:28.060 Yes, but let's put this, let me take a step back and put this into a slightly bigger picture
00:15:33.020 here.
00:15:33.240 Cause I think there's a context here that a lot of different strands going on at the
00:15:37.820 same time.
00:15:38.700 Mr.
00:15:39.120 Carney's a little bit short of a majority and he's introduced a budget without doing much
00:15:42.820 of the groundwork to ensure that one of the opposition parties is okay with it.
00:15:46.940 He's taken, I think, a strong hand.
00:15:48.820 If I were in his position, I would have done the same thing, by the way.
00:15:51.440 So I'm not, that's not a criticism of Carney, just an observation that he didn't go through
00:15:55.220 the normal process of sitting down with all the opposition leaders and giving them each,
00:15:58.360 you know, a bone in the budget to earn their support.
00:16:01.900 So there are, there are smaller bones for individual ridings, individual ridings, but not
00:16:06.760 that might attract individual MPs.
00:16:09.080 Yes.
00:16:10.180 So, you know, that's a tough, that's a tough hand.
00:16:12.560 On the other hand, we're in a tough situation.
00:16:13.940 He's very close to a majority and none of the parties can really afford an election right
00:16:16.900 now.
00:16:17.160 So I think that was the right, uh, uh, chance, chance to take.
00:16:21.520 And now he's in sort of a stare down with the opposition parties to see whether someone
00:16:25.360 of them is going to trigger an election campaign.
00:16:27.040 That's on the one side.
00:16:28.380 On the other side, we forget, but it's, uh, easy to forget a year ago, Mr.
00:16:33.360 Polley was 25 points ahead, 26 points ahead in the polls and lost the election.
00:16:36.840 Again, that creates unhappiness, discontent, confusion inside the conservative caucus.
00:16:43.340 Some people are unhappy about that.
00:16:45.320 Uh, whether they think Mr. Polley has taken full responsibility or has made all the changes
00:16:49.080 that are needed to make sure that doesn't happen again.
00:16:51.040 There's a whole variety of different opinions there.
00:16:53.360 That's normal in opposition caucus, by the way, I've been through many opposition caucuses
00:16:56.920 that are like this, that that is normal, especially after you use the election.
00:16:59.820 And I assume it's normal after you blow a 25 point lead, uh, which doesn't happen too
00:17:04.420 often.
00:17:04.920 So, you know, we're going through some political bends on that.
00:17:07.540 As a old professor of mine used to say, you go up and down as you do when you're scuba
00:17:11.260 diving, you can go through the bends.
00:17:12.480 That's what the party's doing at the moment.
00:17:14.860 And so I don't think anybody's going to see anybody else cross the floor or sit in some
00:17:18.400 kind of rump, but there's obviously a debate going on inside.
00:17:22.100 Mr.
00:17:22.260 Polley faces a leadership review at the convention in January in Calgary.
00:17:26.000 And you can never take those sorts of things for granted.
00:17:29.800 Uh, I know he's got a campaign going on to secure the leadership review for him, which
00:17:33.800 is good.
00:17:35.160 Uh, in the end, I think the question will be, you know, uh, a year ago, Pollyev's personal
00:17:41.080 support outstripped the conservative party support.
00:17:43.120 And so he pulled the conservative party up in the polls as it were.
00:17:46.940 Now he's not.
00:17:47.600 Now he's not.
00:17:48.280 Now he's a drag on the party's support in the polls.
00:17:51.320 I think that's fairly clear across all the polls.
00:17:53.020 The polls are still good.
00:17:53.980 If there was an election, you don't know who'd win.
00:17:56.420 The conservatives are within striking distance in most of the polling.
00:17:59.200 So I, I'd agree with you on, on personal popularity.
00:18:01.840 He is not as popular as Mark Carney.
00:18:04.200 So what's he going to do about that?
00:18:06.180 Uh, but, but on, but on the party support, you know, there is a narrative among some in
00:18:11.200 the media that, well, you know, the, no one wants to vote for the conservatives.
00:18:15.820 They've fallen off the cliff.
00:18:17.160 That's not, that's, that's not accurate at all.
00:18:19.180 But the, the political coalition that brought Pierre Pauli up to 43%, or 42% in the last
00:18:24.960 election is still there.
00:18:26.180 It's the people who don't own anything, would like to get ahead in life, are going to have
00:18:30.180 to take some chances to do that.
00:18:31.560 And the people who supported Carney and made him prime minister at 44%, 45% or whatever
00:18:36.940 it was, the people who own a house and want to protect what they have from Trump and
00:18:41.620 everything else are still there.
00:18:42.900 Not much has changed since April.
00:18:45.760 This is still within striking distance.
00:18:47.220 My, my read of the polls and I've been at this a long time like you, uh, is that if an
00:18:53.900 election were held, we're in the same position that we were April 28th.
00:19:00.380 That's right.
00:19:00.880 And depending on what the ballot question is, either side could win most likely a minority
00:19:06.540 for either side.
00:19:07.720 Yeah, other side.
00:19:08.000 Um, and so all this chatter in my view, and I, I, I agree that there is a real dissension
00:19:15.400 within some parts of the party, but I'll say this, um, it's not a red Tory, it's not
00:19:22.800 the old, well, the PC and the Alliance are pulling apart.
00:19:25.400 Those, those divides don't exist in this modern day party.
00:19:29.240 As far as I can tell, um, I have talked to folks in the party, both MPs and activists
00:19:36.240 from various factions, cause every party has factions and you know what they're all upset
00:19:41.240 about?
00:19:41.900 They didn't win.
00:19:43.480 There's no, oh, he's too harsh.
00:19:45.820 He's too, no, we didn't win.
00:19:48.460 And that's what it comes down to.
00:19:50.240 Yeah.
00:19:50.700 I mean, uh, in particular, cause for three years there are two years, it looked like it
00:19:54.620 was a sure lock we were going to win.
00:19:56.060 And so there's some disappointment on that.
00:19:58.140 And I think between here and the leadership review in January, we're kind of waiting for
00:20:02.600 Mr. Polly have to say, okay, we get, you know, cost of living, good issue, uh, debt
00:20:07.660 out of control, good issue, immigration.
00:20:10.120 Yep.
00:20:10.460 Border control, drugs, so on and so forth.
00:20:12.400 Great.
00:20:13.500 Um, he's going to have to put together the, the picture of, of, of how he wins, how he takes
00:20:19.280 the party to victory.
00:20:20.160 Well, if those are the ballot questions, I think he wins.
00:20:22.560 Yes.
00:20:22.800 I'll be at a minority.
00:20:23.680 But if it's Trump, then Carney wins again.
00:20:26.980 Yeah.
00:20:27.540 Uh, we're kind of in a bit of stasis here.
00:20:30.340 Yeah.
00:20:30.760 This is why I think, you know, all the kerfuffle about an election campaign, it's not in anybody's
00:20:35.220 interest right now.
00:20:36.400 It's not in anybody's interest right now to have an election because it's not clear enough
00:20:39.800 has changed.
00:20:41.840 What did Stephen Harper have to do?
00:20:43.920 Did he have to do anything after that loss and the floor crossing?
00:20:47.840 I mean, I'm sure there was some reflection.
00:20:50.060 Yes.
00:20:50.260 We've all heard that he's deep and dark and brooding and goes off, you know, I'm sure those
00:20:56.060 stories drove you nuts.
00:20:57.200 Yes.
00:20:57.460 Um, but did, what kind of reflection did he do and, and did he make changes internally?
00:21:04.540 Was there a change in how we manage caucus or how we approach the media, how we dealt with
00:21:10.200 candidates?
00:21:11.500 Um, I don't think there was a big change in the way he handled caucus because at this point
00:21:15.460 the caucus was, was pretty united after blowing across the floor, very united.
00:21:19.980 And so in a sense, he always had a good ear for what individual caucus members were saying
00:21:25.720 about his leadership in the direction of the party.
00:21:27.660 Actually, he's a pretty good listener in that.
00:21:28.840 I know he doesn't get credit for it, but he's a very good listener.
00:21:31.200 I've heard the stories from inside.
00:21:32.920 Yeah, yeah.
00:21:33.080 No, no, he, he paid close attention to what people were saying and tried to make sure that
00:21:36.740 he had 80% support in caucus for everything he did and by and large exceeded that.
00:21:40.960 The difference was if I'm going to go back into an election campaign, I need a team that
00:21:47.200 cannot just win an election campaign that can govern.
00:21:49.980 Having a campaign team, having a team that can govern and having preparations to govern
00:21:56.280 takes the pressure off of you while you're campaigning of doubt about what if this ends
00:22:00.340 up in my lap, what am I going to do?
00:22:01.740 No, it's under control.
00:22:02.600 So he brought people on board to help with that.
00:22:04.600 Absolutely.
00:22:05.820 Um, I need a better, uh, marketing team.
00:22:10.040 I need somebody to help.
00:22:11.140 I can't do all the speech writing and political marketing myself.
00:22:15.420 I need some people to help out with that.
00:22:16.920 So Patrick Muttard and a bunch of other Patrick's folks came, uh, on board and overhauled that
00:22:22.520 part of the campaign.
00:22:23.220 And then I need a campaign manager who can bring together a broader group of people, uh, across
00:22:30.160 a broader part of the country.
00:22:31.840 That's Doug, Doug filling came on board as the campaign.
00:22:33.920 So did Doug not run the O4 campaign?
00:22:36.180 No, Tom Flanagan did.
00:22:37.380 Oh, okay.
00:22:37.880 I, you know, Tom's a friend of mine.
00:22:39.000 I've forgotten about that.
00:22:40.040 Yeah, I know Tom's a, Tom's a friend of mine, but, uh, Tom, Tom left, uh, Doug moved up
00:22:46.280 into the campaign manager's job.
00:22:47.800 Uh, Phil Murphy was chief of staff left and I stepped into the chief of staff's job.
00:22:52.180 Uh, there were several, you know, uh, Jim Armour left and a number of, you know, a couple
00:22:57.460 of others left.
00:22:57.960 And then, uh, uh, Patrick came on board on the kind of the big picture marketing stuff.
00:23:03.040 Just decided he needed a different group of, and Marjorie LeBreton came on as a kind of
00:23:07.400 a very close advisor.
00:23:08.680 I can't leave out Marjorie who played a huge role and just.
00:23:12.300 And I remember when she was wearing a black armband because Stephen Harper had taken over
00:23:17.220 her party.
00:23:17.860 Yeah.
00:23:18.060 Yes.
00:23:18.800 And she came around.
00:23:20.260 I think I put it on the record before, uh, before the merger, I might've said some unkind
00:23:24.740 things about Marjorie LeBreton myself, but it turns out we got along great and, uh, she's
00:23:28.840 one of my favorite people in the party.
00:23:30.100 And so, um, uh, you know, he just decided I needed, I need a different team here.
00:23:36.000 I need to cover some blind spots.
00:23:38.000 I need a higher level of aggression.
00:23:40.440 And look, um, maybe this is advice that so much you give to Pierre Polyev that he needs
00:23:47.420 a team that can help him win, that he can't do all of this himself, but that that's an
00:23:53.340 important part of governing too.
00:23:55.120 If you want to be prime minister, you can't do it all yourself.
00:23:57.160 Uh, Mr.
00:23:57.980 Carnegie making a good effort at it, but that, but that runs out.
00:24:01.780 Um, pick up the phone and talk to Doug Ford.
00:24:04.360 Oh yeah.
00:24:05.340 Let's pause there.
00:24:06.500 Let's pause there.
00:24:07.200 We need to take a quick break.
00:24:08.320 When we come back, we'll get into that.
00:24:10.160 What does Pierre need to do based on your lessons that you learned that Stephen Harper
00:24:15.320 learned?
00:24:15.740 What does Pierre Polyev need to do to win?
00:24:18.540 Because I think we could be heading for a spring election.
00:24:21.400 Back in moments.
00:24:22.480 This is Tristan Hopper, the host of Canada Did What?
00:24:25.240 Where we unpack the biggest, weirdest, and wildest political moments in Canadian history
00:24:29.920 you thought you knew and tell you what really happened.
00:24:33.560 Stick around at the end of the episode to hear a sample of one of our favorite episodes.
00:24:37.980 If you don't want to stick around, make sure you subscribe to Canada Did What?
00:24:42.440 everywhere you get podcasts.
00:24:43.840 So just before we broke, you said, uh, Pierre Polyev should pick up the phone and call Doug
00:24:48.340 Ford.
00:24:49.320 I'm not sure that's happened yet.
00:24:52.060 And the election was April 28th.
00:24:55.260 Um, I have said since before the election, he should have been dealing with Doug Ford.
00:25:02.540 He should have been dealing with Tim Houston.
00:25:05.320 There's no relationship there.
00:25:07.100 He should be, uh, should have worked with Jean Charest, you know?
00:25:11.140 Oh, okay.
00:25:11.760 Well, look, you beat him soundly in the leadership, bring him in, you know, have him help you in
00:25:17.520 Quebec.
00:25:18.760 There really was a, it's all about this guy, uh, even candidates and MPs were not showcased
00:25:26.860 during the election.
00:25:27.780 I, and I'm sure you, you've heard from some of them about that, how big is important is
00:25:33.320 it to show you've got a team?
00:25:34.340 Because I remember Steven Harper bringing in, you know, after Oh four was on a radio panel,
00:25:39.460 uh, with Michael Harris, the journalist from down east.
00:25:42.660 And he said, their biggest problem is they don't have bench strength.
00:25:46.160 Well, suddenly you recruited Jim Flaherty.
00:25:48.200 You recruited John Baird.
00:25:49.540 You recruited Tony Clement.
00:25:50.720 You recruited, uh, Jim Prentice.
00:25:52.940 You've recruited people with solid experience.
00:25:56.080 Lawrence Cannon.
00:25:56.880 And so you could say, here's my team.
00:25:59.520 And I think Pierre's got to show that he's got a team and it's not just him.
00:26:03.700 Well, there's two different things here.
00:26:04.880 I mean, certainly I think the team will come to the floor now because in defense of the
00:26:09.800 campaign strategy at the time, uh, as I said, Pierre's, uh, support was ahead of the parties.
00:26:15.820 So you lead with what the strong point is.
00:26:17.940 The strong point is Pierre.
00:26:18.800 Okay.
00:26:18.940 We're building this campaign around Pierre.
00:26:20.260 Now that that's not the case anymore, it would be, uh, uh, an odd election, uh, strategy
00:26:26.640 not to feature the team rather than the leader who's now a net drag, uh, on the party support.
00:26:32.360 But above and beyond that, he's campaigning to be prime minister of the country, right?
00:26:35.720 Not to be opposition leader.
00:26:36.820 He's not trying to be opposition leader again.
00:26:38.440 And why go back to the same job?
00:26:39.660 If there's a campaign in the spring, you get the job you auditioned for, you get the job
00:26:42.600 you auditioned for.
00:26:43.300 And you know what, you know what, who the prime minister of Canada has to deal with the
00:26:45.940 premier of Ontario.
00:26:46.720 It doesn't matter who it is.
00:26:47.900 Uh, the premier of Nova Scotia doesn't matter who it is.
00:26:49.920 So I'll tell you something that, that I was told, and this was not by someone on Ford's
00:26:55.120 team.
00:26:55.340 This was from someone on, uh, Polioff's team is that someone went to him and said, shouldn't
00:27:02.760 you establish a relationship with Doug Ford?
00:27:05.220 Because when you become prime minister, at this point, they're still in the, it's a
00:27:10.420 foregone conclusion.
00:27:11.260 This was before January 6th.
00:27:13.480 I like to say Canada and the U S each had January 6th.
00:27:16.660 They were just very different.
00:27:18.240 Um, that someone said, when you become prime minister, you're going to need to have a good
00:27:22.780 relationship with Doug Ford.
00:27:24.700 And his response was, no, when I'm prime minister, he'll need to have a good relationship with
00:27:28.400 me.
00:27:29.580 Um, like those two need to sit down.
00:27:34.560 Um, break bread, go fishing, something, whatever it is.
00:27:39.000 Look, uh, uh, I don't live in Ontario anymore, so I don't pay, you know, day to day close
00:27:44.720 attention to Ontario politics.
00:27:46.620 So one thing I know is that, uh, Doug Ford's won three majority governments in a row and
00:27:51.620 that's not an accomplishment that's easy to achieve in Ontario hasn't since whatever the
00:27:55.440 1960s.
00:27:56.260 Um, so obviously there's something there, there's some skill there, there's personal
00:28:00.360 connections back and forth between the two teams.
00:28:02.920 I would just get on with it.
00:28:04.260 It doesn't have to be, look, uh, Mr. Harper had dealings with provincial premiers, not all
00:28:09.900 of whom he got along with personally.
00:28:11.920 Uh, but, uh, it's a big complicated country.
00:28:15.040 The premiers have important roles to play.
00:28:17.260 Um, it turns out some of those relationships worked out pretty darn well.
00:28:21.080 Uh, uh, one of them, not a conservative, uh, ended up as Mr. Harper's, uh, ambassador
00:28:26.220 in Washington and another one, not a conservative, ended up as a side commissioner in London.
00:28:30.080 Um, those are people he didn't know, uh, at the time, but made an effort to get to know
00:28:35.260 before he ran and then, uh, after he'd run.
00:28:37.780 So, you know, you're going to have to have like, we're all adults here.
00:28:41.080 It's a big country to run.
00:28:42.440 I know out West Doug Ford is not popular and there'd be a lot of conservatives in the West
00:28:46.500 saying, well, well, he's just a liberal anyway and ignore him.
00:28:51.000 I think that's bad strategy.
00:28:52.440 I think that you've got to work with people that are at least partly on your team.
00:28:56.400 The old someone you agree with 80% of the time isn't your 20% enemy.
00:29:00.920 Look, I know there's people here in Ontario who think that Daniel Smith, my premier is
00:29:04.260 some kind of crazy severist, which she's not, uh, I've said so.
00:29:08.020 Yeah, that's not, that's not true, but you know, guess what?
00:29:10.980 The prime minister has got to have a relationship with the, with the premier of Alberta as well,
00:29:14.460 regardless of who it is, regardless of what party it is.
00:29:16.940 So just get on with that.
00:29:18.240 Uh, you don't need those stories anyway, uh, during an election campaign.
00:29:21.820 So make the phone call and that's, that's the end of the story that you never taught,
00:29:25.480 you know, I've never, I spoke to Pierre Polyev on the Thursday before the election was called
00:29:29.080 or whatever Ford said during the election campaign.
00:29:31.160 Nobody needs any of that stuff.
00:29:32.700 Yeah.
00:29:32.920 Just, you know, be adults and move on.
00:29:36.060 So in terms of where Mark Carney's going, I'd like your assessment of that as someone
00:29:41.340 who's been at the center of these big decisions.
00:29:43.640 Right.
00:29:44.440 Um, he does appear to be running a near solo government.
00:29:50.920 Right.
00:29:51.280 Uh, there's a couple of ministers out there, you know, uh, Frankie Bubbles with the budget.
00:29:55.960 Um, you've got, uh, Tim Hodgson, but beyond that, do you get a sense he trusts his cabinet?
00:30:04.620 Um, look, there are part of Mr. Carney's challenge here is that he didn't come up through the party,
00:30:10.500 right?
00:30:10.780 I mean, he's dallied in and out of the party, knows people inside the party, but it's not
00:30:14.820 like he has a long career inside the liberal party.
00:30:17.080 He was a public servant.
00:30:18.220 He was at the central bank.
00:30:19.300 He didn't live in Canada for many of those years.
00:30:21.800 And so he doesn't have the normal political team that you come to that job with, even
00:30:25.680 if you've never been in government before, you know, Mr. Harper had a team of people,
00:30:29.620 like a press secretary, you know, speechwriters, uh, uh, an executive assistant.
00:30:34.580 Um, Mr. Carney's team is, uh, Tim Hodgson, the natural resources minister with whom he has
00:30:39.060 this longstanding relationship.
00:30:40.700 Going back to Goldman Sachs.
00:30:41.980 And not really much else.
00:30:45.120 So he's, he's apparently got a 30 year friendship with Jonathan Wilkinson, but he's trying to
00:30:49.880 get rid of them.
00:30:50.860 Yeah.
00:30:51.280 So, uh, I think he's trying to find his way.
00:30:55.180 Yeah.
00:30:55.480 He brought, uh, uh, Krista Friedland into his cabinet and then that didn't work out.
00:31:00.180 And so now she's off to some job with Ukraine or something.
00:31:03.380 So sort of a slow motion separation from the liberal party.
00:31:05.980 And we're led to believe there may be other, uh, cabinet, uh, uh, departures coming.
00:31:11.480 I think he's putting together a government as he goes along here because he doesn't have
00:31:15.400 a big, long political tale of, uh, of, uh, friends and allies that he can depend on.
00:31:19.820 He's trying to figure it out.
00:31:21.120 I think that's part of the problem of this government is that it really is, uh, three or
00:31:25.980 four guys at the center who all sort of think like Carney and, uh, come from Carney like
00:31:31.040 backgrounds.
00:31:31.660 And they don't really have much of a sense of what the country looks like from, uh, you
00:31:37.280 know, blue collar, Hamilton, uh, Saskatchewan, uh, New Brunswick perspective.
00:31:42.500 Uh, and the, and the, and the, and the haven't encountered that in their careers for quite
00:31:47.160 some time.
00:31:47.700 You know, Mark starts with humble origins, but that's an awfully long time ago.
00:31:52.020 And, uh, it's not like he's got some trusted folks around him who have a very good sense of
00:31:55.900 how the country as a whole works.
00:31:57.340 They have a very narrow view.
00:31:58.880 So you have a budget that looks like, um, you know, it was written by the IMF for the
00:32:05.520 IMF governing council.
00:32:07.780 Uh, you know, the, the text is a little hard to parse.
00:32:10.760 It's huge.
00:32:11.440 It's technically complicated budget.
00:32:13.560 Uh, what's the storyline for the public?
00:32:15.740 Not clear to me that anybody stopped, you know, hold the presses.
00:32:19.000 What are we going to, what are we going to tell people at the sun and at the national
00:32:22.560 post about what this budget is about?
00:32:24.560 It's not clear that anybody sort of pressed stop and said, what's the retail part of this?
00:32:28.420 I was listening to Scott Reed who spent years on, on the other side with the liberals saying
00:32:34.140 he's never seen such a bad budget rollout in terms of pre positioning, in terms of having
00:32:39.640 a storyline, you know, the, the Martin guys perfected it.
00:32:42.760 You guys picked it up and ran with it when, when you were in yet a couple of stinker budgets.
00:32:47.100 I was sure for them.
00:32:48.320 Um, but you know, there was generally some kind of a storyline.
00:32:52.320 And in this one, if Chris Dantremont hadn't come along and crossed the floor, well, it,
00:32:58.540 all we'd be talking about is $78.3 billion deficit.
00:33:03.940 Assuming for a moment that the Dantremont thing didn't just unfold to the last minute
00:33:07.820 because, you know, part of the story was out and once part of the story is out, the whole
00:33:12.360 story is going to come out.
00:33:13.220 So you might as well move.
00:33:13.840 So he actually, I wrote my first piece about this is that the Dantremont floor crossing story
00:33:20.840 not only shocked the conservative party and the gallery, it shocked Dantremont because
00:33:26.220 he didn't realize that he was telling someone on the record.
00:33:29.040 And so it broke before he, before it was supposed to.
00:33:33.020 Yep.
00:33:33.820 Planning a floor crossing to occur on the day of the budget, after you've presumably put
00:33:38.560 some time and effort into designing the budget, rolling out the budget, pre-announcing parts
00:33:42.260 of the budget.
00:33:42.580 I think that was supposed to happen the next day.
00:33:44.160 The next day.
00:33:44.620 The next day.
00:33:45.300 No, I, uh, so it's, so all we've talked about or all the people have talked about instead
00:33:49.640 of what's in the budget is the Chris Dantremont crossing and problems inside the conservative
00:33:53.320 party.
00:33:53.540 It has saved Carney from having to talk in human terms to actual main street Canadians
00:33:59.880 about what's in this budget.
00:34:01.280 And, you know, it's, it's a, it's a earth changing budget with generational decisions
00:34:05.700 and it, okay, tell me more.
00:34:08.240 It's actually hard to tell you the next, what's the next sentence in that story.
00:34:11.640 There's, there's nothing that's generational transformation that I found in this budget.
00:34:15.480 There's a lot of money set aside for future commitments.
00:34:18.380 Like, I mean, an extraordinary amount, like an almost obscene amount of money, all of which
00:34:22.200 is going to be borrowed.
00:34:22.940 And there's a lot of claims that they will cut spending in the future.
00:34:27.580 And I'm sorry, I don't believe any of you when you say that.
00:34:31.040 No, cutting spending requires some decisions that is difficult.
00:34:34.980 Uh, it's just hard to not only to make the decisions, but to sell them to people and to
00:34:39.380 implement them.
00:34:40.080 So that's a challenge of governing.
00:34:42.500 The problem is that we all believe because he looks competent and we're told he's competent,
00:34:48.120 that Mark Carney has a plan for dealing with Trump and for rebuilding Canada for the
00:34:51.680 future.
00:34:52.940 When is the speech coming in which he fleshes that out?
00:34:58.100 Usually he did one and he said, you're all going to have to sacrifice.
00:35:00.780 You're all going to have to say, okay.
00:35:01.880 That was Jimmy Carter malaise moment.
00:35:03.860 Um, how does the budget fit into that plan for the rebuilding of Canada of the future where
00:35:08.340 we can depend on the United States?
00:35:09.720 Uh, is he, is he, is he able to put together a half hour discussion, uh, sit down with the
00:35:17.560 editorial board at one of the newspapers or do it with some YouTube host or, or come to
00:35:22.580 your podcast and explain it.
00:35:24.580 Uh, we haven't seen that part of Carney's skillset yet.
00:35:27.380 And I'm, I'm not entirely convinced that it's, that it's there.
00:35:31.140 He's done better at retail politics than I expected.
00:35:34.140 Absolutely.
00:35:34.420 He's did better at campaigning than I expected.
00:35:36.360 But you said, you know, will he be able to, um, explain this and sell it to the average
00:35:42.540 Canadian?
00:35:42.980 And well, my time covering him as bank governor, you really have to poke and prod him to get
00:35:47.420 him to do that.
00:35:48.160 It doesn't come to him.
00:35:50.120 And it should to a central bank governor, you know, a retail touch for a central bank governor
00:35:55.660 is usually there's a problem.
00:35:56.980 They're all used to dealing with like Theo from Bloomberg and Paul from the wall street
00:36:01.480 journal.
00:36:01.760 And then I show up and like, can you tell me something basic for the news talk 10, 10 crowd?
00:36:08.860 Uh, but yeah, your quick assessment, and then I'll switch back to asking you about Pierre,
00:36:14.460 your quick assessment of this major projects office and, and how it's going.
00:36:19.540 Like my, my big complaint I keep saying is that I want Mark Carney to live up to his own
00:36:24.520 words of think big, act bigger, move at speeds, not seen in generations.
00:36:28.860 I'm just still waiting.
00:36:32.000 Yeah.
00:36:32.580 Look, there's a series of projects in that window that looked like they were surefire bets
00:36:36.860 anyway, and some projects that are years away from having a proposal.
00:36:40.080 Well, the Sisson-Tungsten mine in New Brunswick, they made a big deal about approving it in
00:36:43.920 2017.
00:36:44.580 Yeah, yeah, no, we're now eight years into the not constructing it, uh, phase, phase of
00:36:48.720 that project.
00:36:49.860 Um, look, uh, Bill C-5 and the major projects office was designed to unlock some of the petrochemical
00:36:56.280 wealth of the country for international markets.
00:36:58.620 And so far, none of that's moved.
00:37:00.460 Um, I think, uh, the, the, the legislation was rushed through the legislative process,
00:37:07.300 which is unfortunate, a good way of making a lot of mistakes on a big senior piece like
00:37:12.720 this.
00:37:13.060 And now major project proponents are sitting back just to see how it goes.
00:37:16.640 Nobody wants to be the first, the first one through that loop.
00:37:20.080 And, uh, uh, uh, Carney has said he wants to hear from project proponents first and then
00:37:27.680 sit back and make decisions.
00:37:28.840 I like this one.
00:37:29.560 I don't like this one.
00:37:30.540 I think if those big projects are going to get done, he has to lean into that more.
00:37:34.820 Uh, or change the regulatory environment.
00:37:37.120 I mean, he, he came to Toronto, told the Canadian club that there's no problems with the regulation
00:37:42.580 that same day.
00:37:44.280 Enbridge and TC energy were holding calls, uh, on their third quarter results talking about
00:37:50.060 the problems with the regulatory, uh, situation in Canada.
00:37:53.580 Yeah.
00:37:54.220 They're investing billions in the U S look the, the emissions cap, uh, the fuel regulations,
00:38:00.160 the tanker ban and the environmental impact assessment legislation as a combination is a
00:38:07.160 bullet aimed at the heart of private sector investment in Canada.
00:38:10.420 We may not like to admit that, but it's true.
00:38:12.960 And if there's going to be anything moved, so that legislation is going to have to be repealed
00:38:17.200 and replaced with something that's a lot easier for investors to deal with.
00:38:20.060 Well, I'm glad you said repeal and replace, because when I spoke to premier Smith a couple
00:38:23.720 of months ago, people just kept saying, well, she wants to repeal the law.
00:38:27.180 And she said, no, there are valid parts within it.
00:38:30.140 But as a whole, C 69 is makes life inoperable for an awful lot of businesses and not just oil.
00:38:38.120 I mean, why is that tungsten mind that's been approved since 2017, not move forward?
00:38:45.240 Because there are so many regulations that make it difficult, if not impossible to go forward.
00:38:52.700 Does all of this give Shere Poliev an opening?
00:38:57.760 Um, you know, in, in terms of, you know, it's one thing if it's just me saying Carney doesn't
00:39:03.780 live up to his own hype, but if Susan Delacorte at the Toronto Star is saying that if Andrew
00:39:07.940 Coyne at the Globe and Mail saying that if people on the street are talking to me about
00:39:12.000 that, that's starting to, to resonate.
00:39:15.540 I used to call it when my kids were little, I'd called it like what breaks through with
00:39:19.220 the other parents at the school bus while you're waiting.
00:39:21.820 And this appears to be breaking through a little bit that he promises a lot, but doesn't deliver.
00:39:28.140 Um, I think a six month, two pieces here, a six month effort on what's he delivered, what's
00:39:35.300 he delivered, what's he delivered, what's he delivered.
00:39:36.900 It's a nice slogan, uh, that you want to push through enough that kids start chanting it
00:39:42.240 in the back of the minivan while mom's driving them to school or while dad's driving them
00:39:45.860 to school.
00:39:46.420 I think it's easy enough to understand and people can read the stories themselves about
00:39:50.920 all the things, you know, generational investments, blah, blah, blah.
00:39:53.140 How has it affected your life?
00:39:54.740 Nothing so far.
00:39:56.260 And then on the other piece, has he fixed the immigration issue that the Trudeau government
00:40:00.940 bought so badly?
00:40:01.880 Not clear to me yet that that, that the effect of that has been felt.
00:40:04.980 That there's still, uh, people trying to get established in the labor market, including
00:40:09.840 especially here in Southern Ontario, uh, facing, you know, major employers that want to advertise
00:40:15.660 for, uh, temporary foreign workers to take their jobs, to, to fill their, their need for
00:40:20.840 labor instead of Canadian kids or Canadians are getting started in, uh, in life.
00:40:25.420 Uh, Mr. Pahliv was on that in September and then kind of backed away from that issue.
00:40:29.140 I'm not exactly sure why.
00:40:30.500 I think that's an evergreen issue as well and could come back.
00:40:32.960 Those two are in effect, the two potential very weak points that are easy to explain
00:40:38.320 to somebody in Oshawa.
00:40:39.600 They're easy to explain to somebody, um, in Milton, Ontario, uh, of what's going on and
00:40:45.680 a certain amount of, uh, patience for the public opinion to follow up to what I think
00:40:50.320 Mr. Pahliv's right to point out here.
00:40:52.260 I think that's an order.
00:40:53.440 Yeah.
00:40:53.560 If you were part of Mark Carney's team, I'm hearing the chatter of spring election.
00:40:59.920 Yes.
00:41:00.580 Replace some of his Trudeau holdovers, bring in his own team, run an election in the spring.
00:41:07.040 Is that advice that you'd say?
00:41:08.580 Yeah.
00:41:08.780 Sounds good, boss.
00:41:09.560 I think you want, I think at this stage, he wants to have the option of doing that.
00:41:14.140 Uh, the economic situation could be, look, if we lose, um, a big Southern Ontario auto
00:41:20.200 plant, you know, one a month from now until April, do you want to have an April election
00:41:24.140 after that?
00:41:25.040 No.
00:41:25.920 Uh, if there's God forbid, uh, you know, a hundred thousand unemployed auto workers
00:41:30.580 floating around Southern Ontario.
00:41:31.720 I mean, I hope this does not happen, but that's a possibility that we have to confront.
00:41:35.160 And then all the upstream and downstream jobs from parts manufacturers and service providers
00:41:39.780 and so forth that go along with that.
00:41:41.200 I mean, I lived in London for six years, you know, um, yeah, I know what the impact of that
00:41:46.420 industry is in that part of the world.
00:41:48.900 If that's the future that we have to confront between here and April, hard to see an election
00:41:53.840 campaign, uh, based on that in particular, because it's hard for, for me to imagine in
00:41:58.840 April, Carney comes out and says, here are five pages from my budget in November that deal
00:42:04.140 with the economic pain that we just went through.
00:42:06.000 I don't see that, you know, there's not an election campaign advertising, uh, uh, program
00:42:10.880 that's built around that.
00:42:12.320 But, um, if there's a pretty good deal with Mr. Trump, better than expected, uh, if the
00:42:19.100 economy is starting to recover at that point, if some of the major projects are starting
00:42:22.240 to drive some investment in Canada, sure.
00:42:23.780 Yeah.
00:42:23.920 You want to go at that point, um, uh, to catch a new NDP leader, you know, the liberals did
00:42:29.600 well because of, in part because of the collapse of the NDP vote.
00:42:32.420 You want to get the NDP before they have a chance to come back and chew a few more points
00:42:36.740 out of the liberal party support and, uh, catch Mr. Polyev before his, uh, uh, you know,
00:42:45.060 show me the beef, uh, on the major projects catches, catches wind.
00:42:51.960 Polyev, uh, faces leadership review in January until the drama, uh, of late.
00:43:00.360 I assumed it would be a slam dunk.
00:43:02.480 Now I think, well, still pretty good, but it depends on how he deals with the next month.
00:43:08.340 Um, do you see him winning it and should he get another shot at an election, whether it's
00:43:13.540 in the spring or later?
00:43:15.220 Um, I think that's always a good idea to let a party leader learn something from an election
00:43:19.460 loss, uh, and to let them, uh, try again, see what, see what they've learned.
00:43:24.120 I mean, it's a risk, but, um, uh, your first election campaign as a national party leader
00:43:28.380 is always a surprise.
00:43:29.600 It's always tougher than you think it's going to be.
00:43:31.520 And so the second time around, at least he'll be prepared for that.
00:43:33.820 So I think that's worth it.
00:43:35.340 Um, a leadership review and I was involved in a leadership review myself for Mr. Harper
00:43:40.460 in 2005.
00:43:41.880 Um, you could never take a leadership review for granted.
00:43:44.880 Uh, there's always surprises.
00:43:46.120 There's always somebody out there campaigning against you, no matter how implausible the
00:43:49.280 case is, there's some people out there working against Mr. Polyev.
00:43:52.300 And I know Mr. Polyev's team is taking that possibility seriously.
00:43:55.580 The question is, how does he motivate people to get to Calgary in the third week of, unless
00:43:59.080 you're planning to go to Lake Louise afterwards for ski?
00:44:01.120 It's a bit of a hard sell.
00:44:02.420 I just assumed that they picked Calgary at the end of January to make sure that nobody
00:44:06.120 came.
00:44:06.340 Well, yeah, the locals will be there.
00:44:08.920 Um, uh, the locals will be there.
00:44:10.540 And of course, Doug Ford's having his convention at the same time.
00:44:12.900 So there's a counter-programming here in Ontario.
00:44:15.360 But you've got to get enough people there that, uh, that he secures that.
00:44:19.720 And that's leadership campaigns and leadership reviews are always full of plots and counter
00:44:24.920 plots and surprises and people come out of the woodwork and so forth.
00:44:28.020 I don't think they're taking any of that for granted.
00:44:29.720 And I don't think they should.
00:44:31.360 Um, I think, uh, at the, yes, we come to the year end interviews and then into the pre-convention
00:44:37.420 interviews, a picture of what, uh, Polyev takes from the spring election campaign and
00:44:42.440 what's going to be different about the next election campaign to put the party on
00:44:45.240 track to win.
00:44:46.780 That's the piece that I don't, I haven't quite seen yet.
00:44:49.180 It is coming to be time for him to put some of that on the record.
00:44:52.800 Okay.
00:44:53.020 So we'll, we'll end there.
00:44:54.520 Um, what does he need to do in terms of building that team?
00:44:58.120 Does, you know, the leader is going to be the same as campaign manager, going to be the
00:45:02.900 same.
00:45:03.120 A lot of fingers pointing at Jenny Burns.
00:45:04.940 Some, I think fairly and some unfairly.
00:45:08.000 I think some of the criticism is, yeah, warranted.
00:45:10.920 You're, you're the campaign manager.
00:45:12.820 You're going to wear it.
00:45:13.580 But I think some of it is over the top, but does she get another shot?
00:45:18.300 Well, I think she's already announced she wants to step back.
00:45:20.140 And I think that's probably a good idea.
00:45:22.160 The party has quite a bit of talent.
00:45:23.680 So, uh, look, uh, Jenny Burnham, Pierre, probably over in effect, sort of a box set.
00:45:29.040 So she's never going to be that far from him.
00:45:30.660 I expect she'll be around and involved in the mix, but, uh, uh, uh, a bigger, broader
00:45:37.580 election team, I think is, is part of the, the, the formula for turning, uh, uh, a disappointing
00:45:43.440 loss into a win in the next election campaign.
00:45:45.680 And there's lots of people around that can help with that.
00:45:48.480 All right.
00:45:48.780 Ian Brody.
00:45:49.640 Thanks so much.
00:45:50.740 Enlightening.
00:45:51.440 Good to talk to you, Brian.
00:45:52.900 Full comment is a post media podcast.
00:45:54.820 My name's Brian Lilley, your host.
00:45:56.320 This episode was produced by Andre Pru.
00:45:58.200 Theme music by Bryce Hall.
00:46:00.020 Kevin Libin is the executive producer.
00:46:02.060 Please help us out by giving us a rating, leaving us a review and hitting that subscribe
00:46:06.720 button.
00:46:07.300 Thanks for listening until next time.
00:46:09.040 I'm Brian Lilley.
00:46:09.820 Here's that clip from Canada did what?
00:46:16.080 I promised you.
00:46:20.380 Castro would end up occupying a space in the Trudeau family, similar to that of a beloved
00:46:25.380 uncle.
00:46:26.480 They went diving.
00:46:27.780 They smoked cigars together.
00:46:29.420 They gathered sea urchins for beach cookouts.
00:46:32.920 Informal talks at an island hideaway intensified their respect for each other and their mutual
00:46:38.980 enjoyment of skin diving added to the rapport.
00:46:42.120 In addition to a well-publicized 1976 summit meeting, Trudeau took three separate vacations
00:46:48.140 to visit Castro after his time in politics had ended.
00:46:51.180 I can make, you know, just one reference to Pierre Trudeau's sons to show the closeness
00:47:01.300 of the relationship.
00:47:02.660 The nickname that the Trudeau sons had for Fidel Castro was Papa Fidel.
00:47:07.040 So that gives you an indication of the closeness of the bond that existed between a communist
00:47:14.840 dictator, you know, thorn in the side of every American administration for the past 50 years
00:47:21.980 and Pierre Trudeau.
00:47:23.100 When Trudeau's youngest son, Michel, died in an avalanche in 1998, Castro called the family
00:47:29.160 in tears to express his condolences.
00:47:31.300 As an eight-year-old, Michel had referred to Fidel Castro as his best friend.
00:47:37.140 When Pierre died, Fidel declared three days of mourning in Cuba and flew to Montreal to
00:47:42.300 act as an honorary pallbearer.
00:47:43.940 Every time Trudeau went down to Cuba, all the people in South Florida, the exiles were thinking,
00:47:52.320 why is this Western leader giving comfort to a murderous dictator, you know, who is oppressing
00:47:59.680 their people in Cuba and saying, you know, good things about Fidel Castro?
00:48:03.800 And as I've mentioned, to have him in the pew at Trudeau's funeral in the front row as a dignified
00:48:13.500 person when he had been such a brutal leader says more about Pierre Trudeau than it does
00:48:22.940 about Fidel Castro.
00:48:24.040 Here's where we should probably touch on what Castro had done and what he was continuing
00:48:28.420 to do while going on beach vacations with the Trudeau family.
00:48:31.340 If you want to hear the rest of the story, make sure you subscribe to Canada Did What
00:48:38.000 everywhere you get your podcasts.