Get hitched. Have kids. Save society from anti-marriage progressive elites
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
183.66418
Summary
Brad Wilcox s new book, "Get Married: While Americans Must Defy the Elites: How to Build Strong Families and Save Civ Civ Civility," details the decline in marriage in America, and the role of cultural elites in helping to explain why.
Transcript
00:00:06.300
Installed window sensors, smoke sensors, and HD cameras with night vision?
00:00:10.620
And you set up credit card transaction alerts, a secure VPN for a private connection,
00:00:14.060
and continuous monitoring for our personal info on the dark web?
00:00:21.360
Choose security solutions from Telus for peace of mind at home and online.
00:00:25.220
Visit telus.com slash total security to learn more.
00:00:40.580
Earn points so fast, it'll seem too good to be true.
00:00:43.600
Plus, join Tim's Rewards today and get enough points for a free donut, drink, or Timbits.
00:00:48.400
With 800 points after registration, activation, and first purchase of a dollar or more.
00:00:51.960
See the Tim's app for details at participating restaurants in Canada for a limited time.
00:00:55.380
Whether you own a bustling hair salon or a hot new bakery, you need business insurance that
00:01:06.960
With flexible coverage options from TD Insurance, you only pay for what you need.
00:01:13.220
There was a time when it seemed everyone wanted to get married.
00:01:25.220
Then marriage became less popular over the years.
00:01:29.000
Divorce became very popular throughout the 1970s and 80s.
00:01:33.620
But is it partly due to fewer people getting married?
00:01:37.040
There's a new book out called Get Married While Americans Must Defy the Elites Forge Strong Families
00:01:43.600
It's by academic Brad Wilcox from the University of Virginia.
00:01:47.240
And he joins me now on the Full Comment podcast.
00:01:54.420
So, I know this is a book directed to Americans.
00:01:58.380
Our numbers are going to be somewhat similar as we talk about statistics.
00:02:05.000
Why do you say that people should be defying the elites?
00:02:11.000
Who are the elites and are they telling us not to get married?
00:02:14.880
So, I think when I first kind of released the title on the internet, and the book wasn't out yet,
00:02:21.400
there was a prominent journalist in the States called Matt Iglesias who was like,
00:02:26.080
The elites are the ones who are doing a pretty good job at marriage in America.
00:02:33.660
So, there's no question that Americans who are college educated and more affluent are more likely
00:02:42.160
But what I think he missed was the way in which a lot of the messaging coming from cultural elites,
00:02:47.540
ironically, including Matt Iglesias, is often not very marriage friendly or even kind of
00:02:54.580
In fact, he had written a piece for a prominent platform called Vox, something to the effect of,
00:03:00.880
you know, marriage is in decline and that's not a big deal, right?
00:03:03.940
So, the point I was getting at in the book is kind of making the argument that elites in journalism,
00:03:09.260
in the academy, in terms of Hollywood, even C-suites nowadays, often will kind of publicly
00:03:16.340
discount the importance of marriage or even sort of, you know, attack marriage in some kind of way,
00:03:20.620
talk about it as patriarchal or as kind of like a, you know, an infringement on people's freedom,
00:03:25.700
even as they're often in their own private lives benefiting from marriage for themselves,
00:03:31.780
for their, you know, their spouse and for their children.
00:03:34.080
And so, it's a kind of way in which a lot of our elites are talking left, if you will,
00:03:38.760
and then walking right, thinking about this in terms of just sort of marriage or family.
00:03:42.900
And that's a problem because they're not kind of using their influence, their power,
00:03:47.080
their authority in their public capacities to kind of share the benefits of marriage and to
00:03:52.840
encourage stronger marriages and families for the country as a whole, for the society as a whole.
00:03:57.620
So, that's kind of the message that I was giving in part in the book.
00:04:01.920
So, as you look at the statistics, and I know you've looked at the Canadian ones as well,
00:04:05.720
and you were recently in Ottawa, speaking to my old friends at Cardis, but as you look at the stats,
00:04:12.200
is there a shocking difference between, you know, if we take it out of the culture war,
00:04:17.840
we put it into the class war, between upper income and lower income?
00:04:22.360
If you're at the bottom of the economic ladder, is there a difference between how you live in
00:04:28.420
terms of family structure than if you're at the top?
00:04:32.640
Yeah, no, there's definitely a class war, in a sense, going on when it comes to marriage.
00:04:38.860
And what we do see is that college educated and, you know, folks who are in the upper third
00:04:43.860
of the income distribution are much, much more likely to be married compared to folks who are
00:04:49.320
in the bottom third of the distribution economically, or who are not college educated.
00:04:55.180
And that divide has really kind of opened up since the 1970s.
00:04:59.900
What I think people don't realize, don't recognize, is there wasn't really a divide
00:05:03.820
when it comes to, like, race or ethnicity or class in marriage and family in the middle of the last century.
00:05:11.320
But in the last, really, 60 years, that divide has opened up in part along class lines
00:05:20.520
Which is ironic, because the whole marriage is the patriarchy.
00:05:28.660
We should, that, where do you hear that the most?
00:05:32.060
On college and university campuses across this continent.
00:05:35.680
You know, what's striking is that we've been looking at some polling lately on kind of whether
00:05:39.960
or not people think that, you know, married parents are important for kids.
00:05:43.320
And the group that's the least likely to embrace that idea, that's the most kind of likely to resist
00:05:51.400
the idea that kind of in the abstract marriage matters for kids are liberal college educated
00:05:58.960
And there's basically almost a 60 percentage point gap between conservative college educated
00:06:05.640
Americans and liberal college educated Americans on that particular question.
00:06:10.200
But, you know, the irony is that, you know, the vast majority of those liberal college educated
00:06:19.640
So this is kind of the tension that we see is a lot of elites, again, are talking left but
00:06:26.140
And, you know, they're not using their authority as professors and teachers and school
00:06:30.280
superintendents, for instance, to kind of share the message about the value of marriage,
00:06:35.480
but also not just some kind of like preaching, but even kind of sharing kind of just their
00:06:39.620
own life experiences with people who may not have grown up with married parent families
00:06:44.260
and might want to actually know, like, well, what do you do when, you know, you're having
00:06:49.300
some kind of disagreement with your wife about something?
00:06:51.900
And how do you kind of navigate that successfully?
00:06:54.320
And, you know, because you've obviously done it.
00:06:56.360
And so I think that's the challenge is that we need to kind of share the benefits and the
00:07:02.580
value, but also kind of some, you know, some strategies for successfully navigating relationships
00:07:07.780
and marriage and family life across, you know, our society to bridge this marriage gap.
00:07:15.960
If we put that out there in a public forum, there'd be a whole pile of people who say,
00:07:30.500
Yeah, I think a lot of contemporary folks do believe that marriage is just a private affair.
00:07:36.220
It just matters for you and your partner and maybe your kids.
00:07:40.120
They don't appreciate that because we are social animals, as Aristotle said, that what happens
00:07:45.620
in our own families matters for our neighborhoods, our cities, our provinces, and for the country
00:07:51.940
And we see, for instance, in the States that there's been a marked decline in happiness in
00:07:59.200
And as one recent University of Chicago economist found, the number one factor that he found
00:08:05.520
in his models that helped to account for that was the decline in the share of Americans who
00:08:11.080
We know from the work of Raj Chetty at Harvard and his colleagues that the number one factor
00:08:15.140
they found that predicted mobility for poor kids, that is, rising from sort of rags as a
00:08:21.120
child to riches as an adult, was the share of two-parent families in a community.
00:08:28.860
So is that for the kid as they're growing up or when they're an adult?
00:08:35.100
So what his work is showing us is that children who grow up in communities with a lot more
00:08:41.140
two-parent families are much more likely to experience economic success as they move into
00:08:49.500
adulthood compared to kids who have lots of single-parent families in their communities.
00:08:54.980
So in the United States, for instance, what he sees is that a community like the San Francisco
00:09:00.760
metro area or Salt Lake metro area, both of which actually have high rates of two-parent
00:09:06.460
families, are much more likely to generate that upward mobility for poor kids in their
00:09:12.780
communities than kids growing up in, for instance, the Charlotte or the Atlanta metro areas that
00:09:19.880
And this is controlling for things like race and ethnicity and school quality and income
00:09:26.460
So it's just kind of showing us there's something about family structure per se that matters,
00:09:31.640
not just at the individual or the household level, but actually at the community level.
00:09:35.820
That we haven't really paid attention to in our thinking and our discussions and debates
00:09:43.920
And so, yeah, I think when marriage is strong, you see less child poverty, you see more mobility,
00:09:49.180
you see more safety in your communities, less violence, less crime.
00:09:55.780
And all this, you know, there's a lot of like collective benefits that flow from strong families
00:10:00.060
that we don't tend to recognize and realize in a lot of our public debates.
00:10:03.480
This is something that economist Thomas Sowell has been talking about in the African-American
00:10:11.800
And he describes the difference between when he was young and growing up in Harlem, going
00:10:18.240
to school there and what it's like now in black communities across the United States.
00:10:23.440
But you've taken what he observed a long time ago and you've looked at it countrywide.
00:10:31.240
And it's important, again, to stress, I think all people don't realize this, but there have
00:10:34.760
been times in American history when African-Americans, for instance, black Americans were more likely
00:10:42.000
And Sowell's, you know, life history is kind of emblematic of the point that I was getting
00:10:47.400
And that is that, you know, there was a time in American life when there wasn't really a
00:10:50.880
big racial divide or big class divide when it came to marriage.
00:10:53.680
But there is now, and that's important both because it reinforces this class divide in
00:11:02.840
And then also on the racial divide, you see work from John Iceland at Penn State showing
00:11:09.360
us that kind of the biggest factor now accounting for gaps in poverty and affluence between blacks
00:11:17.420
And this has kind of been increasingly so compared to previous decades.
00:11:20.600
Um, so when the family breaks down, what we've seen in the United States is working class,
00:11:25.880
poor and African-American, uh, you know, communities have been hit hardest and this kind of marriage
00:11:32.700
divide only reinforces a lot of other divides that, you know, give us cause for concern.
00:11:38.120
If you were to bring this up in a political context today though, and say, we need policies that are
00:11:49.740
beneficial for families and keeping them together or in strengthening families, you would be pilloried.
00:11:56.680
I mean, there's all kinds of so-called family friendly policies aimed at making life more affordable
00:12:01.980
or a tax credit here, a tax credit there, but to say that while we're doing this to strengthen
00:12:08.800
families, that would be seen as, um, social conservatism that would not be welcome in the
00:12:17.980
mainstream of, of many political discussions in the mainstream of much of the media.
00:12:23.680
And that's one of the points I touched on both in the book and some of the commentary that
00:12:28.320
And again, I mean, I, we're living in a world now where unfortunately marriage has become
00:12:34.560
Even though, as you say that, like the, the, uh, college educated liberals are living that
00:12:41.200
That's the tension is that, again, they're often kind of living a relatively, you know,
00:12:46.280
a neo-traditional family lifestyle in private, a marriage centered way of life in private and
00:12:51.800
they're benefiting, you know, uh, people who get married as I show in my book are about
00:12:56.920
twice as likely to be very happy with their lives.
00:12:59.220
Um, they accumulate way more assets across the course of their lives than they're never
00:13:06.540
Um, you know, they're, uh, more likely to in the face of a cancer diagnosis to, uh, to
00:13:14.060
survive because they have the benefit of a spouse in their corner, you know, navigating,
00:13:17.240
you know, hospital realities and doctors offices and all that stuff.
00:13:20.720
So there's just no question that I think most people who have kind of are wise to the world
00:13:26.240
at some level, either explicitly or implicitly recognize that getting married and staying
00:13:33.100
married benefits them, benefits their partner, benefits their kids, you know, benefits their
00:13:37.000
long-term, you know, um, their long-term, um, interests.
00:13:42.740
And yet there has not been a willingness, unfortunately on the left to kind of articulate any of this in
00:13:50.480
You know, I've been, uh, we just had a by-election or as you might call it in the United States,
00:13:56.960
It's made a lot of news and I've been spending a lot of time looking at the demographics of
00:14:04.260
And, uh, it was, uh, striking when I, you know, when, when we said that we're going to have
00:14:11.260
this discussion, I said, okay, well, let's go back and, and test Brad's theory based on
00:14:16.180
some of the electoral districts here and the, the wealthy one in Toronto, St. Paul's, where
00:14:21.040
we had the election, it's, uh, married or living common laws, the stat, and it's more
00:14:27.600
than two thirds are married and less than a third are common law.
00:14:31.800
If you go to a poorer district, uh, those numbers change dramatically and, and the, uh,
00:14:44.360
Well, it's less than a quarter in the wealthy district and it, it's much higher in the poorer
00:14:50.400
So there does seem to be some of that, but is there, you know, is common law different
00:15:00.100
So I haven't investigated the Canadian, um, pattern recently, but we have looked at the
00:15:05.600
difference between cravitation and marriage in the States and then also in Europe, um, and,
00:15:10.520
and countries too, where it's, it's quite, you know, kind of, uh, common, quite conventional
00:15:16.240
to have, you know, people living as a, um, as a cohabiting or common law in a sense, couple
00:15:21.520
with kids in places like, you know, uh, Scandinavia and France and whatnot.
00:15:25.980
And we still found that even, um, in Europe and of course also United States, that kids
00:15:31.900
who were born to married parents were markedly more likely to be still living with their
00:15:36.980
parents compared to kids born to cohabiting parents.
00:15:40.000
And this is true also in Finland and France and other European countries that we've looked
00:15:45.780
So we, we do tend to see that there's a kind of stability premium when it comes to marriage,
00:15:51.140
where, um, kids who are, who are born and raised in married households are more likely to be
00:15:57.060
still with their parents as they move through, you know, childhood and kids who are raised
00:16:02.460
in common law or cohabiting households are more likely to see their parents split.
00:16:07.020
And of course, the big question here is how much of this is kind of about marriage per se
00:16:10.140
versus a kind of selection effect where the kinds of people who get married today might
00:16:13.880
be more educated, affluent, religious, conservative, whatever.
00:16:17.380
Um, I think it's certainly part of the story, but I'd also would suggest, uh, to your audience
00:16:22.920
that, you know, the terms of entry when it comes to marriage and just living together are
00:16:29.760
Um, that there's a public ceremony, even in secular, you know, marriage ceremonies where
00:16:34.800
people are kind of standing in front of family and friends standing before their intended
00:16:39.420
making public commitments and that this is consequential for kind of, you know, uh, the
00:16:48.620
Brad, you talk about things like, uh, which segments of American culture thrive most in
00:16:54.180
marriage, uh, whether kids are a disaster for marriage or make you happier.
00:16:59.100
I want to talk about those issues when we come back more in moments.
00:17:02.040
Brad, in your book, you talk about how some parts of American society are the masters of
00:17:10.560
Who are they and why specifically do, do these groups perform better?
00:17:16.300
So we see in the data, Asian Americans, religious Americans, uh, conservative Americans and college
00:17:25.000
Of course there's overlap between some of those groups, but if you kind of look at those different
00:17:28.420
four categories, you see, they're more likely to get married in the first place and then to be
00:17:33.400
either happily married or stably married in the second place.
00:17:36.020
So I call them the masters of marriage because they kind of stand out in comparison to other
00:17:42.960
And so have you been able to account for that, that certain types of people are more likely to
00:17:51.380
So yeah, I argue in the book that there are kind of five pillars to, uh, strong marriages today.
00:17:57.020
And those pillars are, uh, communion, children, commitment, cash, and community.
00:18:03.620
And I think those groups in different ways, um, sometimes in common ways and other ways,
00:18:08.780
um, you know, often kind of rely on some of those pillars to kind of support their marriages.
00:18:14.540
And so when it comes to like religious Americans and conservative Americans, for instance, they're
00:18:19.200
particularly likely to embrace ideas about commitment in terms of like they're committed to marital
00:18:23.860
permanence as an ethic, or they're committed to fidelity as an ethic in ways that are, you know,
00:18:29.000
somewhat more exceptional compared to the average American.
00:18:32.040
Or talk about community, for instance, as well, and find that people who are kind of embedded in
00:18:36.440
communities that give honor to family, um, and emphasize family are more likely to, you know,
00:18:43.320
And I would say that Asian Americans and, uh, religious Americans tend to be embedded in social
00:18:48.940
networks that, you know, are more likely to sort of either explicitly or implicitly stress the
00:18:53.720
importance of, uh, of marriage and family stability.
00:18:57.540
Um, or when it comes to, um, to cash, what we see is that, uh, a lot's changed obviously between
00:19:04.360
women and men when it comes to working family in the 21st century.
00:19:08.880
But it's still the case that men's stable employment is more important for getting married
00:19:15.740
and staying married than women's, uh, employment.
00:19:18.800
There's a new study from Sasha Killwald, for instance, at Harvard showing that when women
00:19:22.280
lose their jobs, uh, wives lose their jobs, no effect on divorce.
00:19:26.760
When husbands, when men lose their jobs in the family, um, divorce goes up by 33%.
00:19:33.980
And it's kind of tells us that, you know, for kind of communities where men are stably
00:19:38.500
connected to full-time employment, you're more likely to see marriage in a good, uh, position.
00:19:44.980
And we see, I think for all four of these groups, for conservatives, for religious, for, um, college
00:19:51.180
educated and for Asian American, uh, men that they're more likely to be employed, uh, full
00:19:58.280
So why is it, do you think that that, uh, jumps out?
00:20:01.400
Is it because, um, of the psychological impact on, on the man, on, on the husband?
00:20:07.500
Is it a, a, you know, a, a deep seated, uh, need by the wife to say, no, I, I need a man
00:20:20.980
So what we see when it comes to men's unemployment is just, um, it's, it's, I think it's psychologically
00:20:26.720
devastating for guys when they're not working, um, for on average, obviously there are exceptions.
00:20:31.600
We know that there, you know, there's some decent stay-at-home dads, but I'm just saying
00:20:35.540
that for the average guy, the average Joe, um, there was a New York times piece not too
00:20:41.060
long ago showing, for instance, that when women were unemployed, you know, they increased
00:20:44.420
their, their kin care, they're volunteering and they were like, they were doing stuff,
00:20:48.620
you know, men who are unemployed were much more likely to be staring at a screen, um, in
00:20:54.660
And so there's just something I think about the men's self-worth that's more closely connected
00:20:59.960
to, um, to employment that continues to this day.
00:21:04.440
Um, and so we've seen some research, for instance, is that, uh, husbands who are unemployed do less
00:21:09.700
housework than husbands who are employed full-time, which of course is just, I'm sure, infuriating
00:21:15.660
I mean, here you have a guy who's at home, um, not bringing any money in and not doing much
00:21:23.080
So that's kind of a, that's a, that's a, that's going to be a stress fact.
00:21:26.980
Um, and then for the wife, I think, you know, um, and what I found is it's sort of the,
00:21:31.840
on the marital happiness side, the, the, really the effect is for married mothers.
00:21:36.240
Um, so I didn't find a big story for women in general, when it came to husbands being employed
00:21:41.540
full-time in terms of marital happiness, but there was a marked difference for married
00:21:48.200
And so I think for married moms, the issue there is that, you know, they want to have some
00:21:53.460
Maybe, maybe they want to work full-time and they want to work part-time.
00:21:58.900
And if their husband is employed full-time and they've got kids in the house, so it gives
00:22:04.280
them, you know, the latitude, the flexibility, the options, you know, and they can kind of
00:22:09.740
rely upon him to provide a financial secure foundation for the family.
00:22:14.000
And so I think that's why in part, you know, um, when he loses a job, you know, it's much
00:22:20.420
more likely to lead to, uh, you know, to divorce court than, uh, when she loses a job.
00:22:27.560
So we've been talking about the financial side.
00:22:31.620
We were talking about how some groups get married.
00:22:34.120
The class difference is part of the reason that, uh, people are lower on the income scale
00:22:45.920
Is it due to the fact that they may feel, well, I don't have the economic wherewithal.
00:22:51.700
Uh, I don't have tens of thousands of dollars to spend on what's expected of a wedding today.
00:22:57.280
You know, a bachelorette in Nashville, a bachelor party in Vegas, all this crazy stuff, $120,000,
00:23:09.620
I mean, part of the, part of the challenge is that there is kind of like this really super
00:23:14.200
high threshold that's been set for weddings today.
00:23:18.740
It's part and parcel of sort of seeing marriage as a capstone.
00:23:23.040
So when my mom was married, she got married in her early twenties.
00:23:26.180
Um, you know, and you know, that was sort of the norm in her, her set back in the late
00:23:32.740
And so, you know, people didn't have as big weddings and they moved into very modest,
00:23:39.160
And, you know, wasn't a, there wasn't a big kind of economic threshold to jump over.
00:23:44.060
Whereas today, a lot of people think you have to have, you know, uh, a destination wedding
00:23:49.400
and spend, you know, tens of thousands of dollars on the reception and all this kind
00:23:53.920
of stuff, which obviously makes marriage more inaccessible to working class and poor
00:24:00.160
But I think the other piece though, is that we do see, um, and this is again, kind of the
00:24:04.760
irony is that our elites tend to discount the importance of male breadwinners in theory,
00:24:13.560
So we do see, you know, upper income folks are much more likely to have stable male breadwinners,
00:24:21.740
Um, and unfortunately, if you go down the class ladder, you just see that working class and
00:24:25.960
poor couples are much more likely to have situations where she's earning more money, where
00:24:32.100
And that is not, again, not a recipe for, you know, getting married, um, and kind of getting
00:24:41.240
So that's one reason why they're not putting a ring on it.
00:24:43.340
Just because the guy for any number of reasons is, you know, not employed full time.
00:24:49.420
And that's, you know, that's a barrier, uh, for them when it comes to putting a ring on
00:24:55.920
So you deal with a number of different things that you say, okay, well, here's this myth.
00:25:03.500
Um, the soulmate myth and the idea that I love you for as long as it makes me feel happy.
00:25:13.540
So the soulmate myth is this idea that what kind of marriage and love are all about is
00:25:17.920
kind of that intense emotional, that intense romantic connection between two people.
00:25:22.400
I kind of like the butterflies in the stomach that you first have when you meet someone
00:25:25.360
oftentimes and kind of like the sense like we are perfect.
00:25:34.620
And that's, I think, pretty typical for a lot of us at the beginning part of our, you
00:25:38.160
know, of our dating relationship or even, you know, the honeymoon period in life.
00:25:42.120
But the, you know, the fact of the matter is, is Jonathan Haidt wrote in a previous book
00:25:47.660
on happiness is that, you know, for the average couple, there's going to be a shift away from
00:25:52.860
kind of like this intense emotional connection towards a more companionate model, more of a kind
00:25:59.420
And if you don't kind of recognize that marriage is about more than intense feeling, more than
00:26:04.100
intense romantic or emotional feeling, if you don't appreciate too, that every couple
00:26:08.620
has problems and challenges, if there's no perfect soulmate out there for you.
00:26:16.260
And you still see, you know, as I talk to ordinary couples, there are folks out there
00:26:19.640
who still have this idea that if marriage takes work, if there is conflict, if there
00:26:27.160
is, you know, disconnect on some major issue or personality, you know, fit, then you're
00:26:35.640
And of course, my view is that, you know, marriage is a commitment, you know, that you're
00:26:39.760
supposed to love your spouse through thick and thin, and there are going to be tough times
00:26:44.580
and conflicts and compromises that are part and parcel of that.
00:26:48.580
And some people are still sort of stuck in the soulmate mindset, which is just not very
00:26:53.480
realistic for any long-term, you know, friendship or marriage.
00:26:58.500
There used to be a play that was persistently put on here in Toronto and it's called, I love
00:27:05.100
Uh, we all change over time and, and, and things happen and relationships change.
00:27:11.520
If you think it's going to be butterflies the entire, first off, I think that would
00:27:15.360
be awful to live that way forever, but it's, it's just not going to last.
00:27:23.920
And I think, you know, there's also something that's kind of beautiful about being with,
00:27:27.060
you know, someone who's imperfect and of course you're imperfect as well and kind of, uh,
00:27:31.880
navigating challenges and growing together as a couple.
00:27:34.140
And, and, you know, there's something, you know, beautiful and powerful about building
00:27:38.520
a long-term marriage, um, that has, you know, difficult chapters and moments.
00:27:43.740
You've kind of been able to work through these things and see your, your marital friendship
00:27:47.940
So, yes, I just think people need to realize that marriage is about more than just intense
00:27:56.780
It's about having someone in your corner when you do get sick with cancer at age 59
00:28:02.320
Um, it's about kind of being part of a larger kinship network.
00:28:05.940
Um, it's, I think for many, many of us about kind of having kids and raising them together
00:28:11.540
and sort of seeing, you know, a new generation unfold in your own home and then grandkids.
00:28:16.620
So, um, people have kind of what I call more of a family first mentality.
00:28:20.920
Um, I think have a richer and thicker understanding of what marriage is about.
00:28:26.060
And therefore they're less likely to be worried about the ebb and flow of particular, uh,
00:28:30.880
feelings, you know, which will ebb and flow in any given marriage.
00:28:35.700
I, uh, I know many, uh, married couples who for various reasons don't have children, including
00:28:44.780
I thankfully don't know many of the folks that you talk about in chapter seven, the parent
00:28:52.160
I can't say I'm, you know, they're in my social circle, thankfully, but the idea that
00:28:56.540
kids are just kids are the problem and they're going to make your life and marriage miserable.
00:29:06.680
So I think the issue with kids today is multifaceted.
00:29:11.740
I think that there is, um, people are concerned about, you know, uh, finding decent housing,
00:29:17.660
you know, for having kids, they're concerned about the, you know, the environment, uh,
00:29:22.900
they're concerned, I think about the way in which having kids was going to affect their
00:29:26.440
lifestyle, you know, their, their ability to kind of travel and eat out and all this
00:29:31.500
So, um, they're in fact, they're worried about how it's going to affect their career.
00:29:34.520
Um, and so I think all these things kind of coalesce and, uh, help to explain why we've
00:29:43.840
It's down depending upon the, you know, the demographer 1.3, 1.2, um, fertility rate, which
00:29:51.020
means that, you know, across Canada right now, you know, the average woman is going to have
00:29:57.500
Um, and of course the replacement rate is about 2.1.
00:30:00.360
So, you know, absent immigration, of course, you're getting a lot of immigration recently
00:30:04.040
in Canada, but absent immigration, what that tells us is that Canada would be shrinking
00:30:10.440
Um, and it just also tells us there's some, there's some, you know, set of factors, probably
00:30:15.480
both rising cost of housing in Canada, but also kind of just a certain set of cultural
00:30:20.800
assumptions about childbearing that have made, um, you know, parenthood a lot less attractive
00:30:27.400
and in some ways accessible to, uh, to Canadians.
00:30:30.720
But what I think people don't realize is that, you know, uh, what we find is that there are
00:30:38.360
And I think a lot of this sort of revolves around how does this affect women, but no group
00:30:41.960
of men and women who are happier in the United States, for instance, than married fathers
00:30:48.980
Just take women because we've seen the polling data is that women are more skeptical about
00:30:53.160
marriage and motherhood today, um, than men are.
00:30:56.400
And so when, let's just look at the women, what you see is that, you know, 40% of married
00:31:01.100
moms are very happy with their lives in the United States today, compared to just, um, 22%
00:31:11.960
And then when you look at who's the least happy, um, the groups of women who are the least happy
00:31:17.260
got 25% of single childless women versus just 13% of married mothers.
00:31:25.360
So on both ends of kind of a happiness continuum, what we're seeing is that married moms are
00:31:29.840
the happiest and married moms are the least likely report that they're not too happy.
00:31:36.180
Um, they also, married moms also report more meaningful lives and less lonely lives than
00:31:48.320
And that is that kind of, I think the reputation in public, especially for women of marriage
00:31:55.940
And yet the reality is that at least, um, and looking at the survey data, you know, married
00:32:02.960
moms more likely to be flourishing than their single and childless peers.
00:32:05.900
So with all this data, why are so many people, including so many in media, in the academy,
00:32:21.740
If, if their own life experience says one thing, if the data says the same thing as their
00:32:29.020
own life experience, then why are they down on, on the institution?
00:32:35.620
Um, number one is obviously there's been a lot of family instability over, you know,
00:32:40.480
And so, you know, many, I think men, women have seen, you know, their parents get divorced,
00:32:46.040
their best friend, their older sibling get divorced.
00:32:48.880
And so, you know, understandably clouds their view of marriage.
00:32:52.920
Um, I think another part of the story here is, you know, we still live in an age when
00:32:57.360
in the average married family, even progressive families, women tend to do more of the housework,
00:33:02.500
more of the childcare, more of the kind of family management.
00:33:06.960
And, you know, if, if you're committed to kind of a 50, 50 model of, of doing everything,
00:33:12.200
that's going to look, you know, less appealing, um, than, you know, what you would have maybe
00:33:20.520
And so you might be more inclined just to sort of, you know, I don't want to have a
00:33:23.160
situation where I'm, you know, the wife and mother and I have a, you know, uh, an extra
00:33:28.720
burden when it comes to, um, you know, caring for the kids, managing the household, you know,
00:33:35.140
So I want to, I want to kind of focus more on my career, you know, I think that's, that's
00:33:41.160
Um, and then I think too, and this is, this is a harder thing to say, but it's true.
00:33:46.220
So progressives are less likely today to get married.
00:33:55.300
And I think, and less likely to be happy in general, and they're more likely to kind of
00:34:00.660
dominate, you know, our public cultural organs of production, the media, you know, the academy,
00:34:07.720
our public schools, you know, all that kind of stuff.
00:34:10.220
And so I think they're more likely to take a critical take on marriage, um, and family,
00:34:15.960
which then is kind of like distributed across the culture, given where there's, you know,
00:34:22.880
Do you have advice for, um, either for married couples or for, uh, uh, for policymakers?
00:34:30.520
I mean, maybe you've got advice for, for couples.
00:34:33.020
I see that you were, uh, endorsed by forgetting his name Chapman, that the guy behind five love
00:34:38.220
languages, he's one of the people endorsing your book.
00:34:41.200
So I mean, practical advice, what's, what's kind of, what's the takeaway for ordinary couples?
00:34:44.880
One is regular date nights are really valuable for couples, especially couples with kids.
00:34:49.080
I would say just kind of connecting, you know, keeping that, um, I'm not saying that romance
00:34:54.260
is everything that's sort of the soulmate model, but it's really not nothing.
00:34:57.260
So it's important to try to cultivate that romantic spirit, um, you know, on a regular basis.
00:35:03.040
And I think, uh, date nights can be helpful there.
00:35:05.480
I encourage couples to steer clear of a me first approach and embrace a, we first approach.
00:35:12.640
We see is the couples that have got joint accounts are markedly happier unless divorce
00:35:23.960
I, well, I think, you know, money, what's behind that money is a big deal.
00:35:28.900
And, uh, marriage is, you know, about sharing a life together.
00:35:32.800
And so one way you share a life together is, you know, you put your money together, especially
00:35:36.380
because oftentimes, you know, both parties are not earning half their household income.
00:35:42.280
I talked for instance, to a colleague in my twenties when we were both in our twenties.
00:35:53.220
Um, and I asked her, Hey, you know, how's it going?
00:35:55.660
But she expressed some frustration that she couldn't buy a couch for their apartment.
00:35:59.720
And she had, you know, I think two kids at the time.
00:36:02.560
And I was like, uh, just, I didn't say this, obviously, but I was thinking, what's going
00:36:10.260
And, um, and she's, and she kind of like, Oh, we have kind of separate accounts and I
00:36:14.460
don't have as much money in my account as he has in his account and you know, all this
00:36:17.960
And I was just going to like flabbergasted because my wife and I had one account and if
00:36:21.760
she wanted a couch and there was enough money in the account, she'd get the couch.
00:36:25.820
There wasn't, there wasn't like some kind of like, you know, so I'm just saying that's,
00:36:28.160
that's the dynamic in play is that, um, in part, right.
00:36:32.500
You know, whereas if you have a sense of like, it's our money, it's our financial future.
00:36:36.340
We're gonna have to talk through some tough, you know, things.
00:36:44.300
You know, money matters and that is for marriage too.
00:36:46.040
So I think that's, that's an example of kind of more, do you take a, we first approach
00:36:49.940
to money and marriage or do you take a, me first?
00:36:51.880
And I think a, we first is much, much better, um, on commitment.
00:36:55.800
Can I recognize the importance of not using the D word in your thinking or your conversations
00:37:01.980
You know, you've made a commitment, work through your, you know, your challenges for
00:37:05.120
all possible, obviously without, you know, um, opening up that Pandora's box, talk about
00:37:12.560
Um, you know, steering clear of attractive alternatives in the real world.
00:37:16.280
Um, but also, uh, nowadays steering clear of attractive alternatives in the virtual world,
00:37:20.860
you know, and that obviously relates to anything from, you know, social media to pornography,
00:37:27.220
Um, you know, the, the less of that, the better for your marriage, um, is kind of the takeaway
00:37:31.940
for an ordinary couples talk obviously about the importance of men being intentional about
00:37:37.160
Not, I mean, I, a lot of the guys that I know have gotten divorced and, you know, in
00:37:41.340
their forties, fifties are guys that I know have a record of not being stably employed.
00:37:46.420
And I know that it's sort of undercut their wife's confidence in them and their sense of
00:37:53.200
And so obviously some, you know, people are fired without, you know, through no fault of
00:37:58.380
their own, but, but it's also the case too, that there are some kinds of guys who just
00:38:02.660
don't fully take their financial and professional responsibilities with the requisite seriousness.
00:38:13.120
Um, and then, and finally, if, if you've got a religious bone in your body, I would recommend
00:38:16.920
that you go to, you know, your church, your temple, your synagogue, your mosque, because
00:38:20.780
generally speaking, couples who are embedded in a religious community, um, for very sociological
00:38:26.740
reasons in part, you know, you're surrounded by a lot of families tend to get, you know,
00:38:31.200
messaging and encouragement that, you know, pushes you, I say, especially as a dad and
00:38:36.440
husband to be more intentional about, you know, um, being there for your family, for
00:38:44.660
your spouse, for your kids, um, and, um, you know, steering clear of things that can get
00:38:50.140
people into trouble, like, you know, drugs and, and alcohol and whatnot as well too.
00:38:56.560
So, um, those are some things that, you know, that are more practical that come out in the
00:39:05.520
Are there things that are politicians at any particular level of government could be
00:39:11.280
doing to, uh, to change some of these patterns that you've been watching and seeing?
00:39:17.740
So I think one thing is just being very clear that the financial incentives line up with
00:39:21.880
marriage and now parenthood, especially in Canada with your low fertility rate, we often
00:39:27.140
I don't, I don't, I'm not as familiar with the Canadian sort of, you know, policy regime
00:39:30.380
around supporting lower income families in Canada, but we know in the States that a lot
00:39:35.640
of working class couples are penalized when it comes to marriage, uh, because the way in
00:39:41.780
which we've structure our benefits basically means that if you earn above a certain threshold,
00:39:46.580
you don't qualify for something like free healthcare in the United States, um, or free childcare,
00:39:51.360
or, you know, what's called the earned income tax credit.
00:39:55.620
So just being attentive to the way in which, you know, as you look at kind of the, the different
00:39:59.880
benefits that are offered to families in Canada, that they're, you're not unintentionally making
00:40:04.180
it, you know, less financially attractive to get married or to have kids for that matter
00:40:08.580
So that's one issue that I would share with your Canadian eyes.
00:40:12.100
I think another issue is, is housing affordability.
00:40:14.760
I think people are reluctant to get married, especially to have kids if they don't have access
00:40:19.920
to, um, decent housing, especially single family homes.
00:40:24.420
And so I think just, yeah, that is our, our biggest issue in this country right now is,
00:40:30.240
uh, a housing bubble in especially Toronto and Vancouver that is out of control, but rising
00:40:37.920
And the, a lot of the push for, uh, by policymakers is to say, great, we'll build giant condo towers
00:40:45.060
and that might be fine for, for some families with kids, but it's not the ideal that everyone
00:40:52.640
No, that's the challenge is that we see there's something about, there's been some really
00:41:02.160
That's not, um, conducive to family formation and childbearing.
00:41:07.160
Um, so unless you're Jim Gaffigan, well, he's, yeah, he's an exception.
00:41:14.320
You don't want to, um, I mean, we've seen this obviously this, this, this, and it's East
00:41:18.660
I mean, we've, this story is played out in Seoul.
00:41:24.800
So when you build these massive urban centers and big towers, people don't want to have,
00:41:31.560
you know, kids in that, in that context, you need to figure out ways to, um, increase.
00:41:40.900
I'm just saying, you know, give people their own little, you know, their own little castle,
00:41:44.880
I think my parents, my parents' first home that I remember when I was a toddler, uh,
00:41:50.480
would have been maybe 1100 square feet, maybe, but it's a three bedroom home.
00:41:56.380
And it was a single family home on its own little plot.
00:42:01.380
So we had, so I think, yeah, building a lot of modest single family homes would be,
00:42:04.940
would be really helpful if we could figure out a way to do that policy wise.
00:42:07.480
And I know that that's become part of your political conversation in Canada.
00:42:10.660
But the final piece is, you know, Canada has got better family policies.
00:42:16.080
Finland has got better family policies than the United States.
00:42:19.660
No question, for instance, that those two countries, for instance, you know, much better
00:42:23.680
in terms of just benefits, money, blah, blah, blah, for, you know, for families, more parental
00:42:28.280
leave, you know, pay parental leave, all this kind of stuff.
00:42:31.620
But both Finland and Canada, for instance, have markedly lower rates of fertility now than the
00:42:37.920
And I mean, we've got our problems down South in the US, obviously, but I think there still
00:42:42.960
is a kind of greater regard for marriage and childbearing South of the border than there
00:42:50.040
And so there's also a cultural challenge here in question.
00:42:52.760
So I think you've got to figure out ways to, in the media, in your universities, in pop
00:42:59.460
culture, in your education system, to talk up the benefits of marriage and parenthood to,
00:43:06.500
you know, school age children and young adults.
00:43:10.660
Because absent that, you know, you're just going to see a precipitous decline in marriage
00:43:18.680
and family life in Canada, as is, you know, is sort of playing out in a lot of countries.
00:43:26.960
Brad, we are out of time, but thank you so much for your time today.
00:43:31.320
And I encourage people to check out the book, Get Married.
00:43:47.780
Remember to hit subscribe on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, wherever you're getting your podcast.
00:43:52.500
Leave us a rating or a review and tell your friends about us.