Full Comment - April 18, 2022


The joys of ‘duking it out’ over Jason Kenney


Episode Stats

Length

39 minutes

Words per Minute

188.2283

Word Count

7,382

Sentence Count

351

Misogynist Sentences

1

Hate Speech Sentences

1


Summary

Jason Kenney is facing dissent within his own party, the United Conservative Party, and ballots are being mailed out to almost 60,000 party members to ask them whether or not they want to see a leadership election. Kenney has said that if the majority response is yes, he is stepping down as premier. Evan Menzies, who has worked with the Wild Rose Party in Alberta, was director of communications for Alberta s United Conservative party, and now works at Crestview Strategies in Calgary.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Bank more encores when you switch to a Scotiabank banking package.
00:00:07.480 Learn more at scotiabank.com slash banking packages.
00:00:10.840 Conditions apply.
00:00:12.740 Scotiabank. You're richer than you think.
00:00:20.360 Hi, I'm Anthony Fury. Thanks for joining us for the latest episode of Full Comment.
00:00:24.440 Please consider subscribing if you haven't already.
00:00:26.620 What on earth is going on in Alberta politics?
00:00:30.480 And I mean it. I'll confess that as someone Toronto-based, I'm just trying to figure this all out.
00:00:35.540 Is Jason Kenney about to be booted out as the sitting premier of Alberta?
00:00:40.380 Kenney is facing dissent within his own party, the United Conservative Party,
00:00:44.500 and ballots are being mailed out to almost 60,000 party members
00:00:47.880 to ask them whether or not they want to see a leadership election.
00:00:51.680 Kenney has said that if the majority response is yes, he is stepping down.
00:00:55.420 Wow. That's wild.
00:00:57.840 But I gotta say, I kind of like it if only because it seems like democracy in action,
00:01:03.100 and we could do with a whole lot more of that stuff in Canada all across the spectrum.
00:01:07.980 So how did this come about, and where is it headed?
00:01:10.680 Let's break it all down with this episode's guest, Evan Menzies.
00:01:13.740 He's worked with the Wild Rose Party in Alberta,
00:01:15.960 he was director of communications for Alberta's United Conservative Party,
00:01:19.220 and now he's over at Crestview Strategies, where he is a senior campaign strategist
00:01:23.520 in their Calgary office.
00:01:25.280 Hey, Evan, welcome to the show.
00:01:27.260 Happy to be here.
00:01:28.180 This is interesting times in Alberta politics, I must say.
00:01:33.000 Yeah, I joined Wild Rose in 2011,
00:01:36.780 and at the time it seemed like Alberta was paving the way for unorthodox political movements,
00:01:43.640 but yeah, here we are again, definitely carving out new pathways here.
00:01:48.420 Yeah, continuing with the unorthodox moves.
00:01:51.100 So first of all, Jason Kenney, could he lose this vote?
00:01:55.000 Is it in the realm of possibility that he will not be premier a month from now?
00:01:58.880 It's definitely within the realm of possibility,
00:02:02.660 but my instincts, just observing this, is that I think there are very loud sections of the party
00:02:12.660 who are obviously unsatisfied with Premier Jason Kenney's leadership,
00:02:17.340 but my general sense is that a growing segment,
00:02:20.980 I don't know if it's fair to call them a silent majority,
00:02:23.160 but folks who maybe aren't actively in the media cycle every day
00:02:28.120 will be backing Jason Kenney in this vote.
00:02:32.440 The fact that it's a universal vote among membership is, again,
00:02:36.560 unprecedented for a leadership review cycle,
00:02:38.980 but I think we'll certainly help Premier Jason Kenney in his bid to get the party's support.
00:02:45.600 All right, well, let's break down all of that stuff more in depth in a couple minutes.
00:02:48.760 The nuts and bolts, though, of what's going on,
00:02:50.580 we understand we've got ballots being mailed out to, like I said, almost 60,000 party members.
00:02:56.680 They must be returned by May 11th.
00:02:58.880 The results are going to be announced on May 18th,
00:03:01.120 so this is like a straight-up yes or no question.
00:03:03.960 Should there be a leadership review?
00:03:07.140 Yeah, and folks mark their ballot yes to show support for Jason Kenney.
00:03:12.300 No is, obviously, they're looking for a leadership review,
00:03:15.740 and the Premier's previously indicated that he's staying on with 50% plus one
00:03:20.980 and is expecting folks in the party to essentially get behind him
00:03:27.720 after the leadership vote to maintain unity.
00:03:31.160 So that's, you know, that's step one here with the leadership review.
00:03:35.300 We'll see what that number is.
00:03:36.880 Folks who have been against the Premier are calling for numbers in the high 70s, early 80s,
00:03:41.920 for him to be able to stay on.
00:03:44.740 We'll see what happens.
00:03:46.380 So there's step one is leadership review.
00:03:48.940 Step two is the aftermath.
00:03:52.460 Yeah, and what's interesting about that point,
00:03:54.080 that it should be a higher threshold,
00:03:55.360 is there are individuals out there who have been leaders of different parties before,
00:03:58.740 whether it's, you know, in Alberta, federal, what have you, NDP,
00:04:01.600 who have said, I need to get two-thirds or this amount.
00:04:05.020 That's what they'll consider an acceptable leadership review number for them to stick around.
00:04:09.920 Do you have any sense of why Jason Kenney chose 50% plus one?
00:04:13.180 Because, of course, if he only gets just 51%, I mean, that's a pretty divided party there.
00:04:19.180 Yeah, it's, my general sense is that the Alberta, I mean, just like every other jurisdiction,
00:04:27.140 faced some pretty contentious debates over COVID.
00:04:31.000 And, I mean, we're still coming out of that period.
00:04:33.560 And my guess is the thinking from the premier is that the party going into a leadership race right now
00:04:41.200 could be even more divisive than, say, a 55%, 60% leadership review ballot.
00:04:48.380 And that risk of divisiveness in the party having to debate over past COVID actions could cause further splits.
00:04:57.660 I mean, the reality is, is that the United Conservative Party has that united part in front of the name,
00:05:02.760 but it's only five years old, has only gone through one election cycle.
00:05:06.440 So, and obviously the premier was front and center in that debate, trying to unite the two movements.
00:05:11.200 So, I think for him, he obviously, he, I think he's sensitive to the fact that he wants to keep the parties united.
00:05:18.540 And, you know, if, ultimately, if he feels like a leadership race will need to be called,
00:05:24.680 I think he'll take that quite seriously.
00:05:27.880 But I think he's, he's quite anxious.
00:05:30.320 And he said so as such in his public comments and his recent speech on April 9th,
00:05:34.960 addressed to party members that the risk of a leadership review could cause quite a bit of splintering in the,
00:05:41.060 in the conservative movement in Alberta.
00:05:43.620 To what degree is the Alberta movement already splintered and it's just being sort of MacGyvered together to,
00:05:50.260 to stay in place by whatever it is, people obliging to be in this party together,
00:05:55.000 or Jason Kenney through sheer force of, or of will, as you pointed out,
00:05:59.240 being the guy to really unite the party that he's just the one keeping it together.
00:06:02.740 I mean, to what degree would you say the party is a naturally united party right now?
00:06:06.440 And to what degree is it a band-aid amalgam of other groups?
00:06:11.560 Yeah, that's a really interesting, interesting and complex question.
00:06:15.140 Again, we, we have to tie this all back into COVID, but I mean,
00:06:18.880 the, the sort of different parts of the tent here are pretty complex.
00:06:24.600 There's obviously a pretty strong rural and urban divide within the party.
00:06:29.480 Um, again, that's not unusual in any conservative party, right?
00:06:33.740 Uh, you'll, you'll find a pretty strong libertarian bent out here in Alberta.
00:06:38.040 Obviously, uh, you know, the brand of Alberta conservatism is pretty synonymous with,
00:06:43.440 with folks who are passionate and loving of freedom and, uh, and very anti Ottawa.
00:06:48.020 And so there's that sort of section of the party that, uh, it's been a tough couple of years.
00:06:52.580 Uh, we've seen, uh, Trudeau elected not once, but twice and pretty, uh, uh, on campaigns that were,
00:06:59.400 I think, uh, uh, at best pretty negative against Alberta.
00:07:03.120 Uh, then we had COVID, which brought in restrictions and, uh, in defense of the premier,
00:07:07.420 he was always the last to bring them in and the first to, uh, uh, to repeal them.
00:07:12.720 But that, uh, that's been pretty contentious.
00:07:15.160 And of course we, we had the freedom convoy movement in January that I think was kind of
00:07:19.880 an explosion of a lot of, uh, pent up anger and frustration over the past couple of years.
00:07:24.140 So there's, um, but, you know, and then there's other folks in the party who,
00:07:27.520 who wanted a more moderate approach on, on COVID policy than what even premier Jason
00:07:32.780 Kenya was, was presenting.
00:07:34.040 They would have preferred action earlier.
00:07:36.080 Uh, perhaps they would have preferred, uh, the way Ontario went, which, uh, in my view,
00:07:39.980 it was certainly a little bit more aggressive on the COVID file than we were out here.
00:07:43.560 Oh, absolutely.
00:07:43.820 And so, yeah, so all those, all those different factors and emotions are, are kind of,
00:07:47.780 it's pulling everyone in different directions.
00:07:49.200 And because of the intensity of the moment, uh, the intensity of the fight for freedom,
00:07:53.660 I mean, we can see that in the federal campaign right now with, with folks lining behind PR's,
00:07:57.520 uh, probably have some message, message on freedom.
00:08:00.140 Um, I, I think there's just a lot of, I, I, yeah, I use that word intensity again to describe
00:08:05.020 these different camps.
00:08:06.120 Um, I think the premier is hoping that as, as with Omicron and COVID begins to fade in
00:08:11.500 the background, that, that the party members can sort of get back to first principles, talking
00:08:16.280 about freedom, talking about balanced budgets, talking about choice and education fixes to
00:08:20.160 the healthcare system.
00:08:21.640 Now, one of the things that a lot of people feel is that they don't want to so much put
00:08:25.500 this in the rear view mirror until they have had a public inquiry, a commission, a full airing
00:08:31.700 out of what went on.
00:08:32.720 And because I know hearing from at least a lot of people in Ontario who were philosophical
00:08:37.020 conservatives, who were very unhappy with what Doug Ford did, they say, I didn't join
00:08:40.840 a conservative party so I could micromanage people's lives.
00:08:43.500 I take COVID seriously, want to protect the high risk people.
00:08:45.960 But the idea that I didn't sign up for this party so I could tell people, this is how far
00:08:50.620 apart you must stand from people.
00:08:52.400 Uh, you must wear this mask or else we're going to call the cops on you.
00:08:54.780 This is just not what we do as conservatives.
00:08:56.520 And I do feel like there's been, or there should have been a major debate among conservatives
00:09:01.980 about what direction they went ahead and that they never had.
00:09:04.700 And I know that Jason Kenney's saying, I'd like to put some of this behind me.
00:09:08.000 And Doug Ford would like to totally, uh, make people forget about all the things that he
00:09:12.060 brought in the past couple of years.
00:09:13.580 But a lot of people say they can't move forward until they've had that airing of grievances.
00:09:18.420 Is that going on in Alberta?
00:09:19.780 Cause I hear it here in Ontario.
00:09:21.080 Yeah, uh, I, I certainly think that's the case.
00:09:25.100 Um, I, you know, Danielle Smith, who, uh, you know, for folks who may not remember was
00:09:30.200 a leader of the wild rose party and eventually crossed over the PC party in, uh, in 2015 or
00:09:34.800 2014, uh, she's sort of stated that she's open or hoping to run for leader of, uh, the
00:09:40.780 leadership review goes against Jason Kenney.
00:09:42.220 I think she's definitely representing that sort of voice of frustration, uh, among people
00:09:46.660 who are frustrated with COVID, although I, I certainly don't think she's the face for
00:09:49.880 it, but yeah, I, you know, the premier himself has talked about a need to, uh, to review what
00:09:55.120 happened during COVID.
00:09:56.260 Um, and I, I don't think that would be a bad political or tactical move for, uh, well,
00:10:02.120 not just conservative governments, but governments of all stripes to, uh, have, you know, whether
00:10:06.800 it's some sort of public review or, or inquiry to, to understand how decisions were made to
00:10:11.600 understand, you know, uh, were we ready for this pandemic?
00:10:14.320 What are we going to do to be ready for the next one?
00:10:16.500 So we don't have to go through this again.
00:10:18.180 I mean, you'd certainly be familiar with it, but the fact that we spent half a trillion
00:10:23.160 dollars, uh, and went through two years of it, like sometimes, um, nonsensical COVID policies
00:10:28.680 that created a huge societal divisions, uh, we don't need to go through that again.
00:10:32.480 So yeah, there's definitely lots of folks out here who would, who would like to have their
00:10:36.280 say and, and, uh, you know, inform government policy to make sure things like that don't happen
00:10:41.900 again. Uh, the big focus of course, as well, is what are we going to do about our healthcare
00:10:45.940 system? The fact that we have healthcare systems across the country that, that are at the threat
00:10:51.680 of a total collapse, uh, because of a few hundred ICU patients, uh, is something that, um, seriously
00:10:57.600 needs to be addressed.
00:10:58.920 And it's shameful. It's embarrassing. It's scandalous that they can say, you got to shut
00:11:02.400 down the kids' schools, uh, in case there are 200 persons who need an ICU, but 300, that
00:11:06.760 was the number they used here in Ontario. I don't know about the Alberta number. I mean,
00:11:09.220 it's, it's, it's maddening. Yeah. And yeah, at the peak of the Delta wave out here, I think
00:11:14.400 we had about 250 and that, that was, um, uh, anything higher was essentially, uh, total
00:11:20.620 cancellation of surgeries and triage. I mean, in defense of the premier, um, he didn't close
00:11:25.580 schools down again. And, uh, while there was a COVID passport pass, um, which was certainly
00:11:30.720 contentious, um, nothing really closed down after, um, May, 20, uh, 21, um, unless
00:11:39.160 of course, uh, when you get into the vaccine passport, but yeah, it's, uh, it's, uh, it's
00:11:42.880 outrageous. And obviously, um, on public policy front, um, all leaders, uh, including here
00:11:47.760 in Alberta need to show, um, not just their supporters, their base, but, um, all voters
00:11:52.980 that they're going to do something about it.
00:11:55.160 Yeah. We had a full lockdown here in Ontario in January of not 2021, 2022. So ours was more
00:12:01.760 extreme, more severe. Evan, to still pick up on the mechanics of the vote. I understand there
00:12:06.740 was going to be an in-person vote in Red Deer initially, but then that changed. What were
00:12:12.460 the original plans and why did they change? Yeah. So they, uh, the, they, the party set
00:12:19.560 up a special general meeting set up for leadership review. Uh, the party's bylaws that were passed
00:12:25.140 at, uh, uh, an AGM in 2020 required a leadership review to either be held, uh, this year or the
00:12:31.460 year prior, uh, the party board selected this year for leadership review. And then there were
00:12:36.180 some constituency associations who were demanding that it be held earlier. Some wanted it later
00:12:40.880 in the year. Uh, they selected, um, a period that was earlier, but because, um, April was
00:12:46.620 so close to the party's last AGM in November, the party chose to create a special general
00:12:51.120 meeting, uh, designed specifically for the leadership review vote. Um, as a result, um, there,
00:12:57.740 I think there was a, certainly it allowed people to activate and mobilize around the single
00:13:02.180 event, uh, on the leadership review process. And there was incredible engagement, unlike
00:13:06.660 anything we've seen before here in Alberta, um, for context, uh, most AGMs in Alberta or,
00:13:12.120 or leadership review processes, uh, whether it was with the PC party or the wild rose party,
00:13:17.000 I don't think we had ever seen anything higher than 2,500 people attend. Uh, this one in Red
00:13:21.740 Deer, uh, more than 15,000 registrants. And the party was estimating more than 20,000 people
00:13:27.300 to show up at a single hotel for one day of voting in Red Deer. So as a result, the party
00:13:32.500 was faced with a tough question logistically to hold a vote, uh, with 20,000 folks at a
00:13:37.540 hotel in Red Deer, um, uh, great, frankly, I don't think it's just my opinion, but, um,
00:13:42.720 just the cold hard facts would have been impossible. Uh, there were worries about parking people's
00:13:46.700 ability to vote. The fact is, even if you had 12, 14 hours of voting, um, that would have
00:13:52.820 meant you had to process something like, uh, one vote every two seconds. So the party had
00:13:57.540 to make a decision about how, how to, uh, create an alternative for voting.
00:14:01.940 Now, I know there has been some accusations that Jason Kenney wanted to move to a system
00:14:06.100 that is more favorable to him getting votes, uh, that support his leadership and him sticking
00:14:10.500 around. Do you see any validity to those points? Uh, you know, I, I, I, I've been watching,
00:14:17.700 um, Alberta internal conservative party politics for awhile. Um, I think folks would have been
00:14:22.380 complained about the process. In fact, they were complaining about the process that there
00:14:26.060 wasn't a mail-in ballot at first. And then when it switched to a mail-in ballot, uh, they were
00:14:29.900 upset about that being tinkered towards Jason Kenney's favor. Um, ultimately these decisions are
00:14:34.620 made by a party board of volunteers. They of course, um, listen to the leader's opinions, but, um, it,
00:14:41.580 my view was that, uh, the party board had a tough choice to make, um, about how to actually
00:14:47.260 process the vote. Um, uh, like alternatively, if they maintained, uh, uh, in-person voting at a
00:14:53.260 single location in Red Deer, um, uh, the voting day would have been scandalous in itself. People
00:14:58.540 wouldn't have been able to vote, find parking. There would have been hour long lineups. So the
00:15:02.700 party needed to figure out a, uh, um, a solution. Uh, one of the solutions that, that could have
00:15:07.820 happened was in-person, uh, voting across all 87 ridings. Uh, but to organize that in a period of
00:15:13.740 a few weeks would have been a huge task, uh, to make sure that that was held with integrity as
00:15:19.180 well. So I think the party made the best decision they could in the situation that they were in.
00:15:23.420 Uh, perhaps it could have, um, been, uh, made that decision earlier, uh, probably would have, uh,
00:15:29.020 you know, insulated them from some of the criticism, but, um, at the end of the day,
00:15:32.780 I think they, they were, uh, the party who's obviously in charge of executing this vote,
00:15:37.260 um, did the best that they could. We'll be back with more full comment in just a moment.
00:15:43.740 Did you lock the front door?
00:15:46.860 Check.
00:15:47.420 Closed the garage door?
00:15:48.620 Yep.
00:15:49.020 Installed window sensors, smoke sensors, and HD cameras with night vision?
00:15:52.540 No.
00:15:53.340 And you set up credit card transaction alerts, a secure VPN for a private connection,
00:15:56.780 and continuous monitoring for our personal info on the dark web?
00:15:59.900 Uh, I'm looking into it?
00:16:02.380 Stress less about security. Choose security solutions from Telus for peace of mind at home
00:16:07.260 and online. Visit telus.com slash total security to learn more. Conditions apply.
00:16:13.740 Wait, I didn't get charged for my donut.
00:16:17.340 It was free with this Tim's Rewards points.
00:16:19.420 I think I just stole it. I'm a donut stealer!
00:16:22.620 Oof. Earn points so fast, it'll seem too good to be true.
00:16:26.380 Plus, join Tim's Rewards today and get enough points for a free donut, drink, or Timbits.
00:16:31.180 With 800 points after registration, activation, and first purchase of a dollar or more.
00:16:34.940 See the Tim's app for details at participating restaurants in Canada for a limited time.
00:16:38.140 Ontario, the wait is over. The gold standard of online casinos has arrived.
00:16:46.220 Golden Nugget Online Casino is live, bringing Vegas-style excitement and a world-class gaming
00:16:51.500 experience right to your fingertips. Whether you're a seasoned player or just starting,
00:16:56.140 signing up is fast and simple. And in just a few clicks, you can have access to our exclusive
00:17:01.340 library of the best slots and top-tier table games. Make the most of your downtime with unbeatable
00:17:07.020 promotions and jackpots that can turn any mundane moment into a golden opportunity at Golden
00:17:12.460 Nugget Online Casino. Take a spin on the slots, challenge yourself at the tables, or join a live
00:17:17.740 dealer game to feel the thrill of real-time action, all from the comfort of your own devices. Why settle
00:17:23.260 for less when you can go for the gold at Golden Nugget Online Casino? Gambling problem? Call
00:17:29.180 ConnexOntario, 1-866-531-2600. 19 and over, physically present in Ontario. Eligibility restrictions
00:17:36.620 apply. See GoldenNuggetCasino.com for details. Please play responsibly.
00:17:43.340 Evan, one thing I find very fascinating about this whole story is the level of debate that Jason
00:17:49.180 Kenney has allowed within his own party, within his own caucus, because there are other examples of
00:17:54.060 similar schisms happening in Canadian politics, and the leader moves swiftly to shut it all down.
00:17:58.460 Jason Kenney seems very welcoming of all of this. Is this because he has to, because there is such a
00:18:03.820 large constituency that is frustrated and he has to make space for it, or is it just speak to his
00:18:08.620 leadership and the kind of guy he is? I think it might be a little bit of both. You know, Jason
00:18:15.020 Kenney's obviously been involved in parliamentary politics for several decades now. I think he admires how
00:18:20.860 Westminster Parliament operates in the UK, where there's obviously quite more flexibility for
00:18:28.460 folks in the back benches to criticize cabinet and leadership than there has been here in Canada.
00:18:35.100 So I think he appreciates that model. Also, there's kind of a long strain in Alberta politics for
00:18:43.260 the idea of free votes and the ability for MLAs to first represent their constituents before they
00:18:47.980 represent the party. That was sort of an old lobby horse of the Wild Rose Party. So that culture was
00:18:54.140 certainly brought into the United Conservative Party. So, you know, I don't think any leader likes
00:18:59.500 the idea of having splinters of their caucus asking them to resign every couple of weeks. That's not ideal.
00:19:06.380 And I don't think that can be maintained long term. At some point, these folks have to decide if they're
00:19:11.580 running the next election, if they can put their name on the ballot with Jason Kenney as their leader.
00:19:17.260 And, you know, vice versa, how long Jason Kenney wants to entertain folks constantly trying to
00:19:23.420 undermine his leadership while he's in charge. It's, you know, it's a complicated situation. But, you know,
00:19:29.260 at the end of the day, frankly, I appreciate the fact that MLAs have been able to speak with a lot more
00:19:35.420 freedom in Alberta regarding government COVID policy. I remember in spring 2021, there were
00:19:41.100 about 17 MLAs who signed a joint letter saying that they weren't they didn't approve of the
00:19:46.140 government's recent COVID policy announcements, which were much more stringent lockdown policies
00:19:51.020 back then. And, you know, frankly, they were giving voice to a large part of Alberta voters and
00:19:56.220 certainly conservative voters. And, you know, that that part, that's part of a healthy democracy and
00:20:01.740 healthy democratic debate. And at the time, he certainly didn't do anything to stop that debate
00:20:08.620 from happening within the party. So, yeah, that's why in my lead and why I said I kind of like what's
00:20:13.820 going on, not because I have a personal opinion on whether or not Jason Kenney should stay or go. I
00:20:18.380 don't have an opinion. I don't have anything in this fight. But I just find it kind of refreshing
00:20:24.060 that this is something that that can happen. I mean, so many people say I'm in politics for the
00:20:27.420 ideas. Well, here you go. You know, here's the ideas. Duke it out, folks.
00:20:31.740 Yeah. And people have definitely been duking it out here in Alberta the last few weeks and months.
00:20:40.060 It's an interesting contrast, again, because here in Ontario, you know, I've got to tell you,
00:20:44.860 during the most aggressive parts of the lockdowns, there were, I received emails from grassroots
00:20:49.900 party members, donors to the party said, hey, you know, do you know if there's like any way we can get
00:20:54.300 Doug Ford removed? Can we do a leadership review? Can we have a full, like, you know, leadership contest
00:20:59.100 on all of this? We want to go in a different direction. And I think, like, technically,
00:21:02.940 maybe there's like a really obscure way to make it happen. But ultimately, no, it couldn't happen.
00:21:09.260 And I think that the Ontario Progressive Conservative Party rules didn't even particularly allow for that.
00:21:14.300 If a party leader, and this is common, I know, in pretty much all provincial and federal parties,
00:21:19.500 or most of them across the country, that if you lose an election, you must be subjected to a
00:21:25.180 leadership review within a certain amount of time after that. But for sitting prime ministers,
00:21:29.500 sitting premiers, it's generally not so much the case. Was there something, Evan, is there something
00:21:34.780 much more liberal, shall I say, or, you know, much more libertarian about the UCP,
00:21:41.500 the rules, just the drafting of the party rules that allowed this process to take place in the first
00:21:46.540 place? Yeah, I definitely think so. Well, the context behind the rules that allowed this to happen was
00:21:54.620 in 2020, at the AGM, there was a total absence of rules on how leadership review votes would be held.
00:22:03.660 And there was a drafting of leadership review rules that was developed and put towards the membership,
00:22:09.900 and that was ultimately endorsed. But the leadership review rules that were endorsed in the past, I
00:22:16.460 mean, you can sort of argue over the language and the wording as folks do at these things. But it
00:22:23.420 certainly didn't go outside of the tradition of either the Progressive Conservative Party or the Wild
00:22:28.220 Rose Party, you know, the previous entities of the current UCP. There's been a strong tradition,
00:22:35.580 both on the PC side and Wild Rose side with leadership reviews and democratic accountability
00:22:39.900 for members. It's something that the membership, frankly, expects, they see it as a strong mechanism
00:22:45.900 to make sure that the leader stays engaged with membership and responds to their concerns. And
00:22:50.140 as you said, it definitely has, you know, captured the focus of Premier Jason Kenney,
00:22:57.980 I think, as a result, probably sharpened government policy to be more reflective
00:23:01.820 of conservative values over the, you know, the past year during pretty trying circumstances for the
00:23:06.860 government. So, you know, as far as the intent of those rules and how they're supposed to work,
00:23:11.500 I definitely think they've been working. It's obviously caused some consternation and some
00:23:17.020 distractions. But yeah, it's a part of Alberta's conservative culture. Frankly, you know, thinking
00:23:23.500 back to Ralph Klein, it was ultimately his demise was a leadership review vote that happened after,
00:23:29.660 I think, his third majority government. So yeah, it's a big part of Alberta conservative politics.
00:23:35.340 Yeah, fascinating stuff. And I want you to explain the Brian Jean angle to me. I have a big
00:23:40.940 question here. So again, here in Ontario, Roman Baber was a member of the Ontario PC party. He was,
00:23:46.860 he was a caucus member, an MPP, and he published a letter well over a year ago saying he's unhappy
00:23:51.980 with these lockdowns and he doesn't support Doug Ford from doing it. And he kind of knew this would
00:23:56.140 be the end of at least his role in government. And sure enough, the next day, Doug Ford kicked him out
00:24:00.540 of caucus. There you go. So he said he doesn't support the lockdowns and boom, he was booted.
00:24:04.460 Then I hear Brian Jean is getting involved again in Alberta politics. And okay, what's that about?
00:24:09.420 I've got his Wikipedia page up right now. Return to politics is a section. And I know you had just
00:24:14.940 mentioned Brian Jean doing activism against Jason Kenney's leadership. So it says on November 3rd,
00:24:19.500 2021, Jean announced that he would seek the UCP nomination for an upcoming by-election in Fort
00:24:23.660 McMurray-Lac-Le-Biche and won this nomination contest. And I go, oh man, that's really sly of him to
00:24:29.180 to do that, knowing that later he's going to challenge Jason Kenney, because you know,
00:24:33.020 that's very duplicitous, is it not? And then it continues, Jean won the March 15th by-election,
00:24:38.620 having openly campaigned in favor of removing Kenney from the leadership. I go, oh, it wasn't
00:24:43.660 duplicitous at all. He was transparent about it from the very beginning. And surely, Kenney,
00:24:49.980 I guess if he really wanted to, could have blocked Jean doing all of this. But again, tell me,
00:24:54.540 is it Jason Kenney himself, his leadership? Is it the culture of the party that has allowed this to
00:24:59.580 transpire like it did compared to Ontario shutting all those avenues down?
00:25:04.860 Yeah, and it's an interesting question. For transparency, I actually campaigned for Brian
00:25:09.980 during his 2017 leadership bid and obviously worked for him. So temper some of my comments with that.
00:25:16.300 But yeah, I, you know, it's certainly unusual and unorthodox approach Brian chose to take
00:25:25.900 during that campaign. I think the premier's thinking on it was that there's a leadership
00:25:30.460 review coming up. And he, you know, ultimately, he's going to respond to what the members want.
00:25:36.860 And this leadership review vote, you know, is the ultimate say on the future of the party. And
00:25:44.620 I think he'd expect Brian, if the vote goes in favor of Jason Kenney, I think he'd expect Brian to
00:25:52.300 fall in line, or at the very least, begin to show unity and drop the drop the leadership question. So
00:25:59.980 yeah, most parties, you're right. You don't usually run for the party asking for the party leader to be
00:26:07.500 dethroned and replaced. So again, unorthodox, but I think the premier ultimately want the leadership
00:26:13.180 review process to sort of be the final thing. Now, I know one of the things that saw the initial
00:26:17.980 creation of the wild rose party over a decade ago was for frustration at the Alberta PC party,
00:26:24.060 seen as an entitled party, seen as an establishment party. I remember those headlines about Alison
00:26:30.300 Redford and the sky palace, the creation of those lavish facilities. And I think it's fair to say,
00:26:36.620 correct me from your Alberta perspective, if I'm mistaken, that that is really what contributed to
00:26:41.420 the rise of the NDP in that election, bringing Rachel Notley to power. To what degree are we
00:26:47.820 seeing, or at least some people claiming that we are seeing the return of a Tory entitlement culture
00:26:54.460 right now, and that that's driving some frustrations? Yeah, it's an interesting question.
00:27:00.300 Um, I, you know, I think for some that, you know, in the background, obviously any leadership review
00:27:07.820 politics, um, there, there are folks angling to obviously get, uh, Jason Kenney out of a leadership
00:27:13.900 position, but also angling to get themselves into leadership. And so that, that, that line of PC
00:27:20.380 culture of entitlement, uh, certainly will be, uh, a strong, I don't know if dog busses is the right
00:27:25.420 term, but a strong language to remind some voters who might be upset with, um, with the current
00:27:31.980 leadership that they need to get activated and involved. Um, you know, I think any government,
00:27:36.620 as soon as they get into power, they need to be pretty careful about how they, you know, obviously,
00:27:41.660 performing government, how they respond to complaints about, uh, how they're performing
00:27:46.220 in government and how they overall operate things. Uh, so, um, my, my personal view is, uh, it's,
00:27:52.860 it's certainly, um, uh, this current government's been a breath of fresh air compared to, uh,
00:27:57.900 previous, uh, PC governments. I obviously campaigned against them a few times. Uh, they've implemented
00:28:03.020 a lot of policies that the old wild rose party argued for, uh, that the old wild rose party argued
00:28:09.260 for because they thought it would help, uh, address the, uh, the so-called PC culture of entitlement.
00:28:14.220 And so my view is I don't, I don't quite see it that way. Um, I think, uh, that Jason Kenney has
00:28:20.620 in fact implemented basically every single wild rose policy that was advocated for in
00:28:25.500 the 2012 and 2015 election campaigns. In fact, went even further to address, uh, wild rose party
00:28:31.740 policy complaints. So, um, I don't, I don't think we're quite there yet where you can, uh,
00:28:36.540 accuse the government of having the same sort of baggage that the previous, uh, 44 year old, uh,
00:28:41.180 BC government had. There were some concerns about Jason Kenney and travel, some concerns about
00:28:46.140 those photos that we saw across the country of them having a seemingly pleasant dinner on the
00:28:50.700 rooftop patio of the sky palace. I have never once done the, this politician needs to resign
00:28:55.900 for traveling during COVID or whatnot. I always felt that those were just examples of why, well,
00:29:00.380 maybe those rules shouldn't be in place for the rest of us. I didn't do those gotcha moments,
00:29:03.900 but I know a lot of people were frustrated with Jason Kenney for, for a couple of those items,
00:29:08.140 uh, to what degree is that in the mix right now?
00:29:09.980 Yeah. Uh, the original travel item was, uh, with regards to some members of his staff and,
00:29:17.500 and MLAs and cabinet ministers who traveled in, uh, Christmas 2020, I believe. I don't think that's
00:29:23.900 so much, um, in window. I do think that, uh, the damage from that, that, um, outdoor lunch, um,
00:29:31.660 it was my view that, or I guess dinner, it was my view that was technically, certainly within the
00:29:36.940 rules that were in the time and the government was within a period of relaxation, uh, in fact,
00:29:41.420 full opening within, within about a week and a half from there. So I think it was, it was definitely
00:29:46.060 an error for, um, for the folks there to obviously be caught in that moment, um, and, and cause some
00:29:53.580 brand damage, but I, I don't, I don't think it's necessarily lasting, um, as intense as it was last
00:29:59.900 June, but I think it's a reminder for, for the premier and the government that, you know,
00:30:04.060 folks who were upset about how COVID went, that they made missteps and they'll have to
00:30:07.820 continue to sort of rebuild trust with, with folks that, that may have lost in those moments.
00:30:12.300 Uh, the premier himself is, uh, you know, made apologies and, uh, you know, sought to do better.
00:30:17.180 And I, I, I certainly think his commitment to, uh, um, reopening the quickest of, of any jurisdiction
00:30:24.300 sort of shows that, uh, his, his heart's always been in the right place, but he's always been,
00:30:29.180 uh, like with the healthcare capacity issue, always sort of been in a pretty challenging position.
00:30:33.820 Uh, when he's trying to think of what policy levers he had to pull when it came to COVID.
00:30:39.420 Evan, let's talk about the NDP for a moment here, because there was a time when it would
00:30:43.260 be almost inconceivable that the NDP would govern Alberta with a majority even, which is of course,
00:30:48.940 what they received, uh, back then in that election, uh, two elections ago, before Jason
00:30:53.500 Kenney became premier, Rachel Notley, she did not go anywhere. She remained in place as opposition
00:30:58.220 leader. And when we talk about facing a leadership review, well, she did just that last year and
00:31:02.940 she passed her leadership review with a stunning 98.2% approval rating. Normally we're told you
00:31:08.940 see those levels that are that high and you're supposed to, oh no, that's like Vladimir Putin,
00:31:12.780 I don't know, Robert Mugabe territory. You go, what's going on with those numbers there? It doesn't seem
00:31:16.620 right. But, uh, I, I'm sure it was completely right, but I, I, I find it interesting that Rachel
00:31:22.860 Notley clearly didn't have any major challengers for her leadership and that they're fine with her
00:31:28.380 sticking around and they clearly think she has a good chance of becoming premier once again. What
00:31:33.980 do you think is the status of the NDP right now, both within its own party and among Alberta voters?
00:31:40.540 Yeah, I, it's a good question. I think, um, well, there's a few things to consider with the NDP. Uh,
00:31:45.660 the great success of Rachel Notley was that, uh, she managed to, in essence, unite the left, um,
00:31:51.580 in the 2015 election. The, the, the left-wing vote in Alberta has actually been quite strong for a long
00:31:57.180 time. Um, you know, the, the Alberta Liberal Party would sort of consistently capture between 30 to 35
00:32:03.100 percent of the vote. The previous iterations of the NDP would capture something between eight to 10
00:32:07.660 percent. Some, some of that vote was, of course, just anti-government voting, um, at the time, you know,
00:32:13.420 really reflect partisan affiliation, but nevertheless, um, that there's sort of been consistently
00:32:18.620 between 35 to 40 percent of Alberta voters who, um, you know, wouldn't comfortably affiliate
00:32:24.140 themselves with, uh, with the provincial conservative party. And so, um, by collapsing
00:32:29.180 the left, um, she, you know, and the Alberta Liberal Party and now Alberta Party, uh, essentially
00:32:34.540 are irrelevant when it becomes, when it comes to day-to-day politics out here. Um, she, she has quite
00:32:40.060 the hammer to, um, make sure that the party stays united and to stay under her banner. And I think because
00:32:45.740 of that sort of the, the dissent that you'd usually see after losing the majority government just
00:32:50.060 wasn't there. Uh, there are different factions of the party that she has to keep together. There's
00:32:53.980 sort of the more, uh, what I'd call, um, environmentally extreme wing of the party that is less sensitive to
00:33:00.300 Alberta's, uh, economic mainstream, uh, that she has to keep in line. And there's obviously more sort of
00:33:05.660 traditional socialist aspects. And then there's folks who are sort of more economically mainstream
00:33:10.780 that she has to keep, um, all, all those folks happy altogether. So my, my sense is, is that
00:33:17.100 those folks are, are standing by for now and waiting to see what happens in this next election.
00:33:22.380 They've obviously been encouraged by the polling over the past year. It's my view that, um, if,
00:33:27.660 if the United conservative party, however, stays united and we're starting to see movement in the
00:33:31.980 polls back towards, uh, uh, incumbency with the government or support for incumbency with the
00:33:36.860 government that, uh, the NDP will have a pretty hard slog in the next election. If they don't
00:33:40.940 have a divided right vote in the cities, um, uh, they'll have a hard time in Calgary. They might
00:33:45.500 be able to expand their footprint a little bit. Um, but, um, you know, maybe in Lethbridge,
00:33:50.380 they might be able to pick up the seat. There might be a couple of rules, but they,
00:33:54.060 they're mapped for growth in, in Alberta election cycles tough. Uh, they have to essentially sweep
00:33:59.740 Calgary and Edmonton and hope they pick up some small cities, which is essentially, um, pretty close to
00:34:04.540 what happened in the 2015 election. I have a hard time picturing, um, a lot of this suburban,
00:34:09.340 um, uh, ridings in Calgary, voting NDP again, and purely just because of that vote swing. Uh, listen,
00:34:15.420 there was a riding, uh, Calgary Shaw. It's now represented by UCP, MLA Calgary, uh, Rebecca
00:34:20.300 Scholes. That riding, I was a three-way boat split. Uh, the NDP won by a hundred votes to the PC
00:34:26.140 candidate and the Wildrose candidate was 150 votes behind. So to win government again, uh, the NDP will
00:34:31.740 have to win ridings like that. I'm, I'm just not seeing in the cards for now, especially at a time
00:34:35.740 when the economy is finally recovering. And if, uh, if COVID doesn't continue to throw the government
00:34:41.420 sideways over the next year and a half, the government will have a really strong story to
00:34:44.380 Albert. So that's my overall read of NDP. And then if they lose the next election, then I think that
00:34:49.660 party will start seeing some serious fractions that expose itself. Evan, before we go, we've been
00:34:54.940 talking about turmoil within Alberta. I'd like to talk about turmoil vis-a-vis Alberta and the rest
00:35:02.140 of the country. We were talking about Western alienation quite a lot, not too long ago. Now,
00:35:06.860 of course, we're focused on what's going on in Alberta politics. To what degree are the frustrations
00:35:15.260 that fuel Western alienation also going on right now in terms of how UCP party members are, are talking to
00:35:24.380 each other and debating about where they want the party to head, whether or not they want to boot
00:35:28.540 Jason Kenney out all of those, those economic issues, dealing with the oil sands, dealing with
00:35:32.860 getting a fair shake. How is that at play here? It's a major piece. Um, you know, there, there are
00:35:39.820 some, there's a large part of the party that's critical of the premier for not being hard enough
00:35:43.740 on Ottawa, which I'm sure, um, some, some folks in Ontario would be surprised to hear.
00:35:47.740 Hmm. Um, but the, the sense out here is, uh, both the 2019 election and in this past one, um,
00:35:54.380 the federal liberals and Justin Trudeau were, um, overtly hostile to many of Alberta's, not just
00:36:00.140 economic interests, but just the, the standing within the country. Right. And that, that's,
00:36:05.260 that sense of antagonism. I mean, uh, Justin Trudeau has been the, uh, is the least popular incumbent
00:36:11.900 prime minister, certainly in my living memory. And, uh, he's, he's built his coalition purely off,
00:36:17.420 um, uh, dividing, uh, Canadians and, uh, Albertans especially have felt that. And so whether it was
00:36:24.140 on, on COVID, whether it's on, uh, economic developments, particularly in oil sands, um,
00:36:29.500 all Albertans here from Ottawa is that, uh, they're happy to keep taking our money. Um, but they're going
00:36:35.820 to keep making it harder for us to make money. Uh, I think specifically about this past budget. Um,
00:36:41.020 there were a lot of reports about new federal government windfalls, you know, helping shore
00:36:45.020 up their fiscal ship. That's all, that's not all Alberta money, but a large part of that is Alberta
00:36:50.220 money. It's money coming out of Albertans pocketbooks that goes to Ottawa and is unequally
00:36:55.820 transferred across the country instead of getting a thanks or getting, uh, uh, policies in place that
00:37:02.380 significantly help, um, address any sort of economic headwinds the province has faced. Uh, we get policies
00:37:09.500 from the environment minister talking about the, the need to essentially wipe out large swaths of
00:37:14.860 the oil sands over the next decade. So it's, that doesn't, it's remarkable what they say with impunity
00:37:19.900 with a straight face. It's remarkable. Well, and yeah, in Albertans, uh, we'll get a few more seats,
00:37:24.540 but we only have 34, uh, MPs we can send to Ottawa. And, uh, uh, frankly, you know, for any of our
00:37:31.420 listeners out, uh, out in Ontario or Atlantic Canada, like we, we need your, we need your guys'
00:37:36.460 help in the next election. Um, because, uh, yeah, it's, uh, it folks are getting really
00:37:41.340 frustrated. We saw there was an equalization referendum held, um, more than 60, I think it
00:37:46.220 was more than 65% of folks said, we want this thing scrapped. And, uh, I think unless there's
00:37:51.900 any sort of, uh, policies to address, uh, grievances out here, um, that, that anti Ottawa sentiment
00:37:58.540 will continue to increase and the pressure for provincial representatives to go even harder
00:38:03.420 against Ottawa will continue to increase as well. So Albertan conservatives divided on the question
00:38:08.380 of Jason Kenney's leadership, but very united on the question of Justin Trudeau's leadership.
00:38:12.860 And it, it ain't a positive vote on that one. Yeah, no, that's for sure. If, uh, um,
00:38:19.740 there's one name that will, even the NDP, uh, they'll agree that it's, they've, they've taken a
00:38:24.460 harder tone against, uh, Justin Trudeau and, and the, uh, federal liberals, uh, while they've now been in
00:38:29.740 opposition. So, um, it's, uh, there's no name that gets Albertans united more than, um, uh,
00:38:35.660 Justin Trudeau. Wow. That's quite something. And this, this whole thing has been quite something.
00:38:39.260 And Evan, I thank you very much, uh, for walking us through all of the nuts and bolts of what's
00:38:43.420 unfolding in Alberta politics right now. Evan Menzies, thanks for stopping by.
00:38:46.620 Evan Menzies. You bet. Anytime.
00:38:50.700 Full Comment is a post media podcast. I'm Anthony Fury. This episode was produced by Andre
00:38:55.740 Prue with theme music by Bryce Hall. Kevin Libin is the executive producer. You can subscribe to
00:39:01.340 Full Comment on Apple Podcasts, Google, Spotify, and Amazon Music. You can listen through the app
00:39:06.620 or your Alexa enabled devices. You can help us by giving us a rating or a review and by telling
00:39:11.100 your friends about us. Thanks for listening.