Full Comment - November 28, 2022


The truth in Xi's 'very naive' insult to Trudeau


Episode Stats

Length

47 minutes

Words per Minute

137.44708

Word Count

6,516

Sentence Count

270

Misogynist Sentences

3

Hate Speech Sentences

33


Summary

In this episode, Jackson Doherty is joined by Charles Burton, a senior fellow at the McDonnell-Laurier Institute and an expert on Canadian-Chinese relations, to talk about what it was like to be a Chinese student in Canada in the late 1970s and early 1980s.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Did you lock the front door?
00:00:04.060 Check.
00:00:04.620 Closed the garage door?
00:00:05.780 Yep.
00:00:06.300 Installed window sensors, smoke sensors, and HD cameras with night vision?
00:00:09.780 No.
00:00:10.620 And you set up credit card transaction alerts, a secure VPN for a private connection,
00:00:14.060 and continuous monitoring for our personal info on the dark web?
00:00:17.080 Uh, I'm looking into it?
00:00:19.600 Stress less about security.
00:00:21.360 Choose security solutions from Telus for peace of mind at home and online.
00:00:25.220 Visit telus.com slash total security to learn more.
00:00:28.800 Conditions apply.
00:00:31.000 Wait, I didn't get charged for my donut.
00:00:34.400 It was free with this Tim's Rewards points.
00:00:36.600 I think I just stole it.
00:00:38.000 I'm a donut stealer!
00:00:39.920 Oof.
00:00:40.580 Earn points so fast, it'll seem too good to be true.
00:00:43.600 Plus, join Tim's Rewards today and get enough points for a free donut, drink, or Timbits.
00:00:48.400 With 800 points after registration, activation, and first purchase of a dollar or more,
00:00:51.960 see the Tim's app for details at participating restaurants in Canada for a limited time.
00:00:55.440 Bank more encores when you switch to a Scotiabank banking package.
00:01:05.820 Learn more at scotiabank.com slash banking packages.
00:01:09.100 Conditions apply.
00:01:11.000 Scotiabank.
00:01:11.660 You're richer than you think.
00:01:12.740 Hello and welcome to the Full Comment Podcast.
00:01:22.880 My name is Jackson Dohert.
00:01:24.120 I am the guest host for today.
00:01:25.840 I'm joined by Charles Burton, who is a senior fellow at the McDonnell-Laurier Institute
00:01:30.800 and an expert on Canadian-Chinese relations, which is great because China is in the news
00:01:37.680 very much with allegations of Chinese meddling in Canadian elections and a testy exchange
00:01:43.800 between our Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau, and Chinese leader, Xi Jinping, recently at
00:01:50.260 the G20 summit.
00:01:52.100 Thank you very much, Charles, for joining us.
00:01:55.400 It's great to be on the podcast.
00:01:56.760 Thank you very much.
00:01:58.860 We're going to talk about that exchange between Xi and Justin Trudeau, but I wanted to start
00:02:03.940 by taking things back a little bit.
00:02:05.940 You were a student at one point in China, and I was wondering if you could tell us when
00:02:11.100 that was and what your impressions were of the country then, specifically its political
00:02:16.160 leadership.
00:02:18.500 Yes.
00:02:19.020 Well, when Canada established diplomatic relations with China in 1970, there was a program agreed
00:02:26.580 to by our Minister of External Affairs and the Chinese Premier of the State Council, Zhou
00:02:32.120 Enlai, to exchange 10 students from each country.
00:02:36.320 So, I was one of the 10 in my year who was sent to study in China.
00:02:42.960 I'd already learned Chinese at Cambridge University, so I was able to, you know, fit into the program
00:02:49.500 there.
00:02:50.280 This was the class of 77, which actually entered university in 1978.
00:02:57.640 It was the first class that had entered university in China after the disruption of the Cultural Revolution.
00:03:04.380 Most of my roommates and classmates were about 30 years old, having graduated high school, you
00:03:12.720 know, 65, 66, 67, and then getting into university in 78.
00:03:18.380 At that time, you know, it was a very optimistic period.
00:03:24.000 Chairman Mao had died.
00:03:26.040 When I first got there, there were portraits of Chairman Mao and his successor, Hua Guofeng,
00:03:32.380 above the blackboard in the classroom in about the same place in my elementary school classroom
00:03:38.020 where we had a portrait of Her Majesty the Queen.
00:03:42.060 But the ideological restrictions were gradually being removed, and the professors at the university
00:03:48.640 who had been sent out to labor in the people's communes or were working in factories or in prison
00:03:55.200 were gradually what they referred to as rehabilitated and returned to work in the university.
00:04:03.020 So I had an opportunity to have a lot of access to very distinguished Chinese scholars
00:04:10.200 who had, you know, become prominent before the revolution in 1949
00:04:16.820 who had just been returned to university after 10 years of, you know, prison or hard labor hell.
00:04:25.440 I studied the history of Chinese ancient thought in the philosophy department,
00:04:31.180 so I was reading ancient Chinese texts.
00:04:34.080 But, you know, there was still a lot of politics there.
00:04:36.080 You know, we still labored in the people's commune fields as part of the curriculum.
00:04:45.100 But there was great optimism among the students about the future of China,
00:04:50.880 the end of the policies of repressive revolution,
00:04:55.460 and the prospect of bringing China into the global community
00:05:00.660 as a democratic nation that had enormous potential.
00:05:06.800 Unfortunately, by the 1980s, that dream was shattered,
00:05:10.560 but at the time I was there, it was an extremely good time.
00:05:14.480 And I would say that, you know, the opportunity for a Canadian
00:05:18.500 to so fully integrate into the Chinese society and university has long passed.
00:05:24.780 I mean, I had the same conditions pretty much as any of the domestic students.
00:05:30.640 The Chinese authorities wouldn't allow a Canadian to get so close and so intimate
00:05:37.400 with the realities of China today.
00:05:40.540 So it was a great experience for me.
00:05:42.100 I stayed there for four years with virtually no contact to Canada over that period
00:05:48.140 because, you know, this is pre-internet and pre-easy long-distance telephoning
00:05:53.940 and came back to Canada really quite transformed by the experience.
00:05:58.700 So you've established yourself as one of the great critics of Chinese policy here in Canada.
00:06:06.580 I was wondering if you could talk about the formation of those views.
00:06:10.800 How much of that was when you were a student?
00:06:12.660 And how much of it was during your time working there in the diplomatic service?
00:06:19.100 Well, you know, certainly I was very pleased to see the economic rise of China.
00:06:27.020 You know, when I was a student there, everything was rationed, particularly food.
00:06:32.440 And so we really didn't get enough to eat.
00:06:34.600 I lost an awful lot of weight while I was there because the rice ration just wasn't enough.
00:06:40.260 And I eventually had my family mail food in from Canada.
00:06:46.200 But, you know, when I was working in the embassy, I was very much taken with the idea
00:06:51.040 that if Chinese people became aware of how a democratic society like Canada works,
00:07:00.060 that this is something that they would want for their country.
00:07:02.880 So, you know, we put a lot of Canadian taxpayers' dollars, I think probably close to a billion,
00:07:09.900 into what was called good governance, democratic development, human rights programming.
00:07:15.540 And so on my second posting at the Canadian Embassy in Beijing,
00:07:18.880 I was working out of the political section in the civil society program,
00:07:25.100 which was a program to try and encourage a Chinese non-profit sector,
00:07:29.580 you know, to encourage the establishment of parallel to, say, the Canadian Cancer Society
00:07:34.700 or any number of organizations where citizens take responsibility for their society.
00:07:41.580 And we had programs to train Chinese judges.
00:07:45.360 We built a building in Beijing for preparation for a large-scale program of exchange,
00:07:53.440 primarily with the University de Montréal.
00:07:55.080 And we had a lot of other programming designed to try and bring the Canadian way over.
00:08:02.920 And I was the Canadian, I think, most involved in the bilateral human rights dialogues,
00:08:08.620 which went on for about, I don't know, six or seven years from the late 90s until the middle 2000s.
00:08:17.800 And, you know, we had hoped that if senior Chinese people in positions of policymaking authority
00:08:25.940 understood how our democratic system functions, what an independent rule of law is,
00:08:32.440 how, you know, one has these arm's-length relationships with civil society,
00:08:38.380 including free press function, that they would want that for China.
00:08:43.060 You know, I think in retrospect, there was a high degree of naivete.
00:08:50.060 I think the Chinese authorities agreed to these programs, providing Canada provided serious funding
00:08:56.580 for infrastructural and other development that met the needs of the Chinese communist planning process.
00:09:03.280 And in 2005, I was engaged by what was the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade,
00:09:11.740 now known as GAC, Global Affairs Canada, to write an assessment of the dialogues.
00:09:17.920 And I went around China trying to find out what the impact of these dialogues had been.
00:09:22.620 And I found that really the Chinese seemed to regard human rights dialoguing as something they were doing for Canada
00:09:29.340 so that, for example, if there was a question in the House of Commons about the arrest of, say,
00:09:35.400 a political distant or a Catholic bishop, the appropriate minister could get up and say,
00:09:41.680 yes, we're addressing these concerns through a confidential dialogue process that's kept confidential
00:09:48.700 so it'll be effective.
00:09:49.840 But trust us, you know, we're doing what we can to promote Canadian values in China.
00:09:55.140 This turns out to have been, you know, pretty dissembling.
00:10:01.360 And after my report came out, the Chinese government changed their venue for their dialogue process
00:10:09.080 from the organization's department to the bilateral desks of their foreign ministry.
00:10:15.100 And the international process in Brussels for nations to compare their bilateral dialogues with China was closed down.
00:10:25.360 And I think that the last of the dialogues ended just a couple of years ago.
00:10:29.880 The Australians had one where quite senior Australian officials were involved,
00:10:34.480 thereby requiring their Chinese counterparts to participate.
00:10:38.400 The Canadian dialogue was never taken that seriously by the government of Canada.
00:10:42.900 And, you know, I think after that, I developed a degree of cynicism about the prospects for China
00:10:52.000 to become a responsible stakeholder in global affairs and felt more and more concerned
00:10:59.560 about what China's rise would mean for China domestically and for China's role in the world.
00:11:09.460 And I think that, you know, I started to really, you know, start to write opinion pieces in newspapers
00:11:20.880 and do a lot of commentary on China and evidence to various Canadian parliamentary committees.
00:11:29.860 You know, my report on the Human Rights Dialogue was considered by the Foreign Affairs Committee.
00:11:34.860 Their report was never released by the government, though Parliament died before it came out.
00:11:41.380 But I think about 2006, I started to try and ring the bell of concern over China.
00:11:49.420 And, you know, not to be immodest about it, I think a lot of what I have been writing over the past 15 years
00:11:56.340 is standing up pretty well to the test of time today.
00:12:00.880 And I must say I'm gratified to see that while, you know, a few years ago I might have been seen
00:12:07.080 as an extreme element, conspiracy theoristic, you know, panicky commentator,
00:12:14.920 I think now my views are more or less in the mainstream,
00:12:17.820 particularly in the United States and Europe and increasingly in Canada.
00:12:21.740 So it's good to see that there are a lot more people singing from my song sheet
00:12:25.900 and I think articulating what I've thought for a long time better than I can myself.
00:12:32.360 How does Canada fit into China's global strategy?
00:12:36.540 You mentioned in a recent op-ed piece of yours that I read that Canada is China's chew toy,
00:12:42.280 I believe was your term.
00:12:43.460 What did you mean by that?
00:12:45.760 Well, I think that China does have domestic factors where the Chinese regime wants to convince people in China
00:12:58.460 that the autocratic one-party system under the charismatic, strong man, poor life, perhaps,
00:13:06.920 leadership of Xi Jinping is the best way for a country to be run.
00:13:11.020 And I think that, you know, saying negative things about Canada and Canadians in the Chinese media
00:13:19.080 is a means to try and emphasize this point, what they refer to as the confidence in the Chinese political system.
00:13:31.080 And the idea that China would assume global hegemony in their belief that the United States
00:13:39.480 is a power in terminal decline and the replacement of institutions of global governance like the UN
00:13:47.400 or of, you know, intended to ensure free and fair and reciprocal trade like the WTO
00:13:54.500 and replace them by Xi Jinping's doctrine of the community of the common destiny of mankind,
00:14:00.380 which is really a world-run, you know, subservient,
00:14:05.460 where all the nations of the world are subservient to China.
00:14:07.840 China and their Belt and Road International Economic Infrastructure Program of ports and rail
00:14:15.760 and, in fact, real roads extending between China and Eurasia and, you know, potentially North America.
00:14:23.120 They do, there have been some speculation they could run something over the Bering Strait and all the way down.
00:14:28.760 But, you know, this is really about a program where the belts and roads all terminate in China.
00:14:34.660 And so China would not only be the political center of the world, it would also be the economic center of the world.
00:14:42.320 And countries like Canada would provide the raw materials and political support for China's larger agenda,
00:14:51.900 which Mr. Xi hopes to realize by 2049 or 2050, the 100th anniversary of the establishment of the People's Republic of China in 1949.
00:15:01.860 I mean, the plan is audacious and, in my view, unlikely to be realized, but, you know, that is what informs China's policy.
00:15:12.420 And so in that context, you're not going to have, you know, equal relations between sovereign states.
00:15:19.600 The notion of state sovereignty is subordinated to this idea of China, what they refer to as rejuvenation.
00:15:30.220 In other words, a restoration of the traditional cosmology where the only legitimate authority in the world is the emperor, the son of heaven.
00:15:40.100 And that civilization extends in concentric circles from the Chinese capital.
00:15:47.940 And so, you know, other regimes are just not legitimate in the sense of having any ultimate authority,
00:15:55.180 but simply to administer barbarians who are out of the direct administration of the central authority.
00:16:02.400 That, you know, that was China's traditional view of itself.
00:16:06.800 Also, perhaps not able to be verified through sound historiography, but that's the way it was written.
00:16:13.600 And I think Xi Jinping sees himself as, you know, a new period emperor.
00:16:19.520 He's recently said that the Chinese Communist Party has broken the cycle of dynasties.
00:16:25.360 In other words, he's not expecting there to be any change in the political paradigm in China ever now.
00:16:33.600 There were 24 dynasties in history.
00:16:35.700 Arguably, his could be the 25th.
00:16:38.640 And that we should accept this reality and get used to it.
00:16:43.040 And Canada should understand its place in the world.
00:16:46.060 And, you know, the dynamic that you saw between Xi Jinping and our prime minister, Justin Trudeau,
00:16:53.060 where he was treated with a high degree of disdain and perceived as by Xi,
00:16:59.020 who muttered at the end of the interaction, naive,
00:17:02.600 is the way that China sees the world and the way that China wants Canada to be in relation to China.
00:17:08.720 So, you know, there are a lot of concerns there about China's intentions.
00:17:12.080 It's not that this will be realized, but that China is attempting to make this the future reality
00:17:19.620 and is suggesting its international programming and its interference in Canada's domestic politics accordingly.
00:17:27.780 What did you make of that exchange?
00:17:30.480 You know, obviously you talk about Xi's language and his apparent kind of contempt, perhaps, for Trudeau.
00:17:39.200 But what about Trudeau's reaction?
00:17:40.520 He certainly seemed to be not expecting it.
00:17:44.620 I think that Mr. Trudeau did not expect it.
00:17:47.040 And it wasn't scheduled.
00:17:48.560 And I'm not sure the degree to which it was planned, but it was recorded.
00:17:52.820 I mean, Mr. Xi seems to have seen Trudeau somewhere between sessions heading for a coffee or something
00:17:59.580 and come up to him for a few seconds and given him a thorough dressing down of, you know, a boss to a subordinate.
00:18:07.100 Using language which, you know, really has a certain kind of mafia thuggish to it, particularly aspect to it.
00:18:15.620 You know, particularly when he said, in effect, if you're not going to respect us and play according to our norms,
00:18:21.840 then I can't really say what might happen, which is the literal translation of, you know, what he said.
00:18:29.420 So it wasn't any kind of normal diplomatic language, but bore a resemblance to this wolf warrior diplomacy that we've seen by some Chinese ambassadors serving abroad,
00:18:41.840 particularly the ambassador before our current one, Lu Xiaoyer, who has continued with this kind of thing in France.
00:18:49.220 The French don't seem to take it quite as readily as the Canadians did.
00:18:54.000 And the foreign ministry.
00:18:55.460 But it's the first time that I've heard Xi Jinping be so utterly rude and, you know, direct in his suggestion that if Canada doesn't get in line with China,
00:19:09.700 woe betide us, because, you know, China will retaliate.
00:19:13.180 And I think that it does suggest that we'll be seeing some form of Chinese retaliation if the Indo-Pacific policy that, you know, is touted to come out in a few weeks,
00:19:25.440 it's been touted to come out in a few weeks, of course, for some time,
00:19:29.180 actually is a policy which attempts to address China's, you know, expansionist activities in the region
00:19:40.260 by us sending more military support to Australia, the UK and the US and the Indo-Pacific.
00:19:46.020 And if we, in fact, start to seriously constrain China's espionage activities in Canada,
00:19:53.200 illegal police operations designed to intimidate persons here in Canada
00:19:58.380 and start expelling Chinese diplomats who are responsible for these Chinese Communist Party United Front Work Department activities,
00:20:09.460 which is what this kind of interference in Canada's approach to China consists in.
00:20:17.320 If we do that, I think China will feel it has to retaliate because it not only wants to send a message of punishment to Canada,
00:20:25.640 but also wants to indicate to other lesser countries that if they're going to seriously challenge what China's doing,
00:20:32.700 that China will extract a cost.
00:20:34.440 And I think up to now, Canada has turned a blind eye to this kind of appalling behavior by the Chinese regime in our country
00:20:44.560 because there are, you know, important economic players who want Canada to maintain its market access
00:20:54.720 and preferential treatment by the Chinese regime.
00:20:59.520 And if Canada cracks down on non-economic activities by the regime preparing for this community of the common destiny of mankind,
00:21:08.400 that we could be punished economically.
00:21:11.440 So, you know, that seems to be the dynamic that's existed up until recently.
00:21:17.820 But I think now that the Americans are more or less on our case,
00:21:21.320 you know, Secretary Blinken was in Canada in October.
00:21:26.120 And after that, Canada agreed to engage in a strategic dialogue on Indo-Pacific policy with the United States
00:21:32.480 and requested that we be admitted to the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework for Prosperity program,
00:21:40.200 which the United States had invited 14 countries to and had fairly markedly excluded Canada from.
00:21:46.740 So I think that, you know, our policy is changing because of increasing awareness of the dangers of Chinese malign activities in Canada,
00:21:56.080 but also because it could impact on our alliance with the United States,
00:22:01.520 particularly the continued viability of Canada's membership in the Five Eyes Intelligence Sharing Consortium,
00:22:08.740 which is very important to Canada, not just with regard to countries like China, Russia and Iran,
00:22:14.840 but also the border and the Arctic.
00:22:17.460 So, you know, it's the whole Xi-Trudeau interaction in Bali, I think, is a kind of signal event
00:22:26.180 that suggests that Canada better get its act together on China pretty soon,
00:22:32.020 or we'll be very sorry as the balance tips away from the United States and towards China by default.
00:22:39.740 We'll be back with more full comment in a moment.
00:22:43.300 Tell us more about the police stations.
00:22:45.200 I mean, I think those are a particularly egregious institution,
00:22:49.740 and maybe a little bit about the benign justification that China has given to them that perhaps you don't accept.
00:22:56.800 Well, I think that, you know, the Chinese say, oh, yes, we have police stations in Canada.
00:23:04.580 That's a perfectly normal thing.
00:23:07.080 And it's because there are so many Chinese in Canada that have been unable to return to China
00:23:13.160 because of the COVID restrictions and need to renew their driver's licenses.
00:23:17.980 And apparently these things are supposed to provide driver's license renewal.
00:23:21.920 I must say, following the Canadian Chinese press and media and so on,
00:23:28.020 I've never heard of any advertisement saying if you need your driver's license renewed,
00:23:34.000 Chinese driver's license renewed, here's the address you can go to and get a new one.
00:23:39.880 But, you know, for a long time, China has been sending their police into Canada on false pretenses
00:23:48.860 with a view to pressuring persons in Canada to render themselves back to China to face some charges.
00:24:00.140 And, you know, this is based on the reality that there is no extradition treaty between Canada and China
00:24:09.100 for very good reasons.
00:24:11.080 China does not follow due process of law.
00:24:13.620 China does not follow the internationally recognized rules of evidence.
00:24:19.760 China engages in pervasive use of torture and interrogation.
00:24:25.960 And China applies the death penalty to a wide range of offenses.
00:24:30.980 So we have no extradition treaty.
00:24:32.180 So we do know that, you know, in the past, particularly in one refugee hearing that I was involved in as a witness,
00:24:42.200 that the Chinese police admitted that it was true as the head of the immigration section
00:24:49.100 in the Canadian embassy in Beijing, Susan Gregson, testified at the time
00:24:53.140 that they had got a fake invitation from a Canadian firm to invite people into Canada for a purpose of trade negotiations.
00:25:08.360 And, you know, the names that were provided to our immigration authorities were the names of police officers
00:25:16.120 and the brother of the refugee claimant, Lai Shuiqiang.
00:25:21.780 The refugee claimant was Lai Changqing, a major smuggler.
00:25:27.080 You know, they came to Vancouver, spent several days with Mr. Lai,
00:25:31.920 trying to convince him to render himself back to China.
00:25:35.320 Mr. Lai refused and applied for refugee status the next day.
00:25:39.900 And these police then returned to China and subsequently Mr. Lai's brother,
00:25:46.160 who had come to Vancouver with the police, died in prison under mysterious circumstances.
00:25:51.700 So, you know, we know this goes on.
00:25:53.480 And there's even a TV series in China on this fox hunt operation,
00:25:58.100 which is ostensibly to induce Chinese officials who have come to Canada
00:26:06.360 with massive assets of dubious provenance escaping factional struggle or criminal investigations in China
00:26:16.140 to get them to come back to China and to repatriate those assets.
00:26:21.100 So, you know, it's not as if the Chinese are making a secret of this
00:26:24.960 because they, you know, they describe it in a TV drama with, I don't know, about 70 episodes.
00:26:31.320 So, you know, it's really about hiding in plain sight.
00:26:36.400 And I think that surely our authorities have been aware of these police operations
00:26:42.180 and have not seen fit to constrain them.
00:26:47.740 And now we hear that China's setting up these, I think, 55 or so around the world,
00:26:54.140 permanent installations to convenience this operation
00:26:57.480 as opposed to, you know, them coming in ad hoc, case after case.
00:27:01.380 So, you know, it seems outrageous that Canada would not close those things down,
00:27:08.500 bring to court anybody who is behaving illegally
00:27:14.100 or who is in Canada on false visa claims,
00:27:19.120 and that we should declare persona non grata
00:27:22.120 those Chinese diplomats in the Chinese embassy and consulates in Vancouver, Calgary, Montreal,
00:27:30.980 who are coordinating this activity.
00:27:33.000 I mean, there are a lot more Chinese diplomats
00:27:35.120 accredited to Canada than the diplomatic cohort of any other nation,
00:27:40.700 including the United States.
00:27:42.480 So, you know, they do seem to have a lot of people here,
00:27:45.160 and I think we should be wondering
00:27:46.640 exactly why they need so many people in our country.
00:27:49.800 You know, presumably Chinese diplomats are not functioning less efficiently
00:27:54.480 than those of other nations,
00:27:55.700 so one could draw the likely assumption
00:27:59.000 that they are engaged in activities
00:28:00.580 which are not compatible with their diplomatic status,
00:28:03.480 and their diplomatic status should therefore be revoked.
00:28:06.580 On the election meddling, what is the, you know, strategic aim?
00:28:12.520 Is it to just keep, you know, criticism of China at bay from Canadian politics,
00:28:18.020 or is it deeper than that?
00:28:19.320 Is it to try to, in some way, guide Canada's attitude toward China
00:28:25.740 or its government policy?
00:28:28.720 Well, this has been a long-time policy of the United Front Work Department.
00:28:33.500 Again, you know, not hidden.
00:28:35.800 I mean, you can read the documents about this,
00:28:38.740 and they want more persons of ethnic Chinese origin
00:28:42.200 to be involved in becoming elected to democratic legislatures,
00:28:48.080 and, you know, they want to influence politicians
00:28:53.620 through various inducements.
00:28:56.180 Now, of course, you know, there are two issues here.
00:28:59.800 One is that naturally we want our parliaments
00:29:04.040 and provincial legislatures and municipal governments
00:29:07.480 to reflect the diversity of Canada,
00:29:10.680 and so it's highly desirable that we have more people of Chinese origin
00:29:14.380 in positions of political authority in our country.
00:29:17.440 You know, that goes without saying.
00:29:19.800 But the difficulty is that there are some politicians in Canada,
00:29:25.860 some of them of Chinese ethnic origin, some of them not,
00:29:29.260 who seem to consistently articulate the positions
00:29:33.180 of the government of China
00:29:36.120 and who we suspect may be the recipients
00:29:40.260 of benefits from the Chinese state.
00:29:43.880 So what we would like would be
00:29:47.520 for there to be a Foreign Influence Transparency Scheme Act
00:29:51.920 comparable to that of the Australian legislation of 2018
00:29:55.600 that requires people who are in the political process
00:30:00.180 and the policy process, if they are recipients of benefits
00:30:04.680 from a foreign state, directly or indirectly,
00:30:07.300 that they should be required to declare it
00:30:10.220 so that any conflict of interest that they may have
00:30:13.200 could be assessed by, you know, by Canadian people
00:30:17.280 who might vote or might not vote for them.
00:30:20.640 And this has been very much opposed by certain politicians
00:30:25.300 as, you know, in all sorts of grounds,
00:30:27.660 such as, you know, what's going on in Australia
00:30:30.460 couldn't possibly be happening here in Canada
00:30:32.580 or it would violate the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
00:30:36.380 or that our police and security agencies
00:30:41.540 are already fully in command of the situation.
00:30:44.560 So the more people complain
00:30:45.880 about how we shouldn't have this kind of act,
00:30:48.140 the more concerned I get that maybe we really do need it.
00:30:51.620 And certainly it's very hard for us currently to track this
00:30:58.340 once someone retires from public service.
00:31:01.920 If they become appointed to a China-related law firm
00:31:06.500 or a board of a Chinese company,
00:31:09.540 you know, there's no reason why that isn't
00:31:13.060 a perfectly legitimate thing to do.
00:31:15.640 You know, there's no laws being broken.
00:31:17.760 It simply gives me a sense of unease
00:31:21.560 as to whether this could be a reward
00:31:23.620 for how they handled their advice to government
00:31:28.220 while on the taxpayer's dime in positions of trust.
00:31:33.300 So I'm very much supportive of legislation
00:31:35.940 that would require transparency
00:31:37.920 among people who receive foreign benefits.
00:31:41.420 And, you know, once we've got that,
00:31:42.920 I think it might dampen the willingness
00:31:45.040 of Canadian politicians and senior civil servants
00:31:49.020 to receive those benefits.
00:31:50.920 And certainly that's what's happened in Australia.
00:31:53.440 You know, the legislation may not be very well drafted.
00:31:56.680 The Australian government may not have allocated
00:31:58.760 sufficient resources to enforce it.
00:32:01.780 But the simple existence of this kind of legislation
00:32:04.460 does seem to have led to a number of former politicians
00:32:08.480 and civil servants resigning from China-related positions
00:32:12.680 and is probably causing people
00:32:16.180 who might want to benefit from, you know,
00:32:19.540 what my friend at the Royal United Services Institute
00:32:22.520 in London, Charlie Parton,
00:32:24.040 refers to as life-transforming amounts of money.
00:32:27.700 So, you know, it's...
00:32:29.000 I hope that this will be something that we'll see
00:32:31.800 on the Canadian legislative agenda very soon.
00:32:34.940 I've certainly been, you know,
00:32:36.560 trying to bring this up over and over again
00:32:40.120 in various public comments and editorials.
00:32:44.900 And I think the idea does have some traction.
00:32:47.960 And we have seen some legislation introduced,
00:32:52.180 private members in Commons and the Senate,
00:32:55.580 which China is taking enormous exception to.
00:32:58.380 You mentioned Australia a couple of times.
00:32:59.980 Do you think that Australia serves
00:33:01.540 as a kind of cautionary tale for Canada
00:33:03.660 in terms of relations with China?
00:33:05.780 Well, I think that, you know,
00:33:10.340 Australia is certainly paying a much greater cost
00:33:13.300 than Canada would pay for its policy on China
00:33:18.980 designed to protect Australian security and sovereignty.
00:33:23.100 I mean, you know,
00:33:23.860 our external commodity trade to China
00:33:27.200 amounts to only about 4% of what we sell abroad.
00:33:32.060 And it's mostly agricultural commodities and minerals
00:33:36.180 that for which there is a global market.
00:33:38.900 So if China engages in economic coercion against us
00:33:42.380 and refuses to take our soybeans,
00:33:45.120 they're going to be buying more from Brazil.
00:33:47.060 And, you know,
00:33:48.180 then that'll open up market space for us.
00:33:50.040 So obviously,
00:33:51.840 we don't want to be
00:33:53.660 too dependent on the Chinese market for anything.
00:33:57.220 And we always want to diversify our trading partners.
00:34:00.480 But, you know,
00:34:01.000 it's not as disastrous for us
00:34:02.600 as it might be for Australia
00:34:04.300 that's sending more like a third
00:34:05.900 of their external commodities trade to China,
00:34:08.860 particularly things like wine and coal, iron ore.
00:34:13.000 So I think, you know,
00:34:15.800 some investigations were done in Australia.
00:34:18.380 There was quite a famous report
00:34:21.760 in the Australian News
00:34:24.880 where the Australian former Minister
00:34:27.440 of International Trade, Andrew Robb,
00:34:30.060 who had negotiated the free trade agreement
00:34:32.080 between Australia and China that,
00:34:35.420 you know,
00:34:35.660 an agreement that China wanted Canada
00:34:37.340 to more or less cut and paste at the time,
00:34:39.740 but which our authorities in the civil service said
00:34:43.320 just wasn't,
00:34:44.960 was just too much in favor of the Chinese side
00:34:47.780 and we wouldn't want that.
00:34:49.560 Anyway,
00:34:49.920 Andrew Robb was involved
00:34:51.760 in negotiating that trade agreement.
00:34:53.320 He was involved in the 99-year lease
00:34:56.240 on the port of Darwin
00:34:57.400 to a Chinese billionaire,
00:34:59.680 Huang Xiangmo,
00:35:00.760 and an agreement between Darwin
00:35:02.620 and the Chinese port of Ruzhao
00:35:05.060 for a sort of sister port arrangement.
00:35:08.080 Subsequently,
00:35:08.780 it was discovered
00:35:09.460 that this Chinese billionaire,
00:35:11.240 Huang Xiangmo,
00:35:12.600 had,
00:35:13.600 was giving Mr. Robb
00:35:15.240 an $880,000 a year
00:35:17.580 private consultancy.
00:35:19.520 So there again,
00:35:21.760 nothing illegal in that.
00:35:24.120 Mr. Robb,
00:35:25.200 anyone who's receiving $880,000 a year
00:35:27.880 for a part-time job
00:35:28.880 is obviously a very good consultant.
00:35:31.440 It's certainly
00:35:31.960 a thousand times,
00:35:34.700 I think,
00:35:34.980 more than my fees
00:35:36.020 for consulting on China.
00:35:37.240 And I think
00:35:39.320 that this then
00:35:40.120 was what led
00:35:41.100 to discussion
00:35:43.040 of this issue
00:35:45.660 of benefits
00:35:47.880 from the Chinese state
00:35:48.860 going to persons
00:35:50.740 in Australia.
00:35:52.400 And, of course,
00:35:53.280 Australia
00:35:53.660 was also involved
00:35:55.680 in the
00:35:56.260 Australia-UK-US
00:35:58.820 Indo-Pacific
00:36:00.120 Security
00:36:00.880 Consortium
00:36:02.680 and has been
00:36:04.440 much more active
00:36:05.800 in challenging China.
00:36:07.220 You know,
00:36:07.400 one of the things
00:36:08.020 that China's been
00:36:08.720 complaining about
00:36:09.500 with Australia
00:36:10.260 has been
00:36:11.540 Australia's demand
00:36:14.720 that China
00:36:15.260 should allow
00:36:15.840 an impartial
00:36:16.900 international investigation
00:36:18.680 of the sources
00:36:19.920 of the COVID-19 virus.
00:36:22.740 So, you know,
00:36:23.680 China takes
00:36:24.300 enormous exception
00:36:25.380 to that,
00:36:26.940 which in itself
00:36:28.040 I think is rather
00:36:28.920 suspicious,
00:36:30.060 isn't that?
00:36:30.580 The Shakespearean
00:36:31.380 me thinks he complains
00:36:32.560 too much.
00:36:34.540 And, you know,
00:36:36.580 China made,
00:36:37.520 I think it was
00:36:38.140 18 demands
00:36:39.140 of Australia
00:36:39.860 for areas of policy
00:36:41.620 that China wanted
00:36:42.500 to see changed
00:36:43.500 or the same sort
00:36:45.020 of thing as we saw
00:36:45.840 in Bali
00:36:46.300 or else
00:36:47.080 Australia has resisted.
00:36:50.200 And then you'll
00:36:50.720 notice that in Bali
00:36:52.040 the Australian
00:36:52.800 Prime Minister
00:36:53.540 got a proper
00:36:54.620 bilateral meeting
00:36:56.540 with Xi Jinping
00:36:57.200 at which he was
00:36:58.780 quite conciliatory
00:37:00.220 towards Mr.
00:37:01.280 Albanese
00:37:01.760 unlike Canada
00:37:03.340 which is not.
00:37:04.400 So, it seems
00:37:05.560 that countries
00:37:06.420 that, you know,
00:37:07.540 show a bit of grit
00:37:08.560 and don't allow
00:37:10.340 themselves to be
00:37:11.360 cowed or appease
00:37:12.660 China
00:37:13.100 seem to gain
00:37:14.220 more respect
00:37:14.920 and I think
00:37:15.800 relations with China
00:37:16.860 go better.
00:37:18.120 And so, I do think
00:37:19.160 that there is a lot
00:37:20.060 for us to look at
00:37:21.380 with Australia,
00:37:22.860 you know,
00:37:23.160 a comparable country
00:37:24.340 with comparable values
00:37:25.660 with comparable
00:37:27.580 political and economic
00:37:28.760 systems that is
00:37:30.400 managing the China
00:37:31.420 relationship much
00:37:32.680 more effectively
00:37:33.460 than Canada is.
00:37:34.980 So, you know,
00:37:35.880 I think that,
00:37:36.920 you know,
00:37:38.560 Canada does need
00:37:39.420 more Australia
00:37:40.180 in its China policy
00:37:41.740 and I think Australia
00:37:42.660 is quite prepared
00:37:43.580 to assist us
00:37:44.460 in trying to get
00:37:46.060 our laws and practices
00:37:48.060 into effect
00:37:48.900 because, you know,
00:37:50.320 the more countries
00:37:51.080 that are allied
00:37:52.160 in a common
00:37:53.300 approach to China,
00:37:54.280 the more leverage
00:37:56.060 we'll have
00:37:56.720 to counter China's
00:37:57.940 expansionist
00:37:58.940 and other malign
00:38:00.360 activities in those
00:38:01.340 countries.
00:38:01.960 Is there an inherent
00:38:03.000 risk in deepening
00:38:05.000 our economic ties
00:38:06.040 with China?
00:38:06.560 I know that there's
00:38:07.400 the idea of this
00:38:08.200 distinction that we
00:38:09.160 want to shore up
00:38:09.980 our diplomatic
00:38:11.840 interests,
00:38:13.240 our security interests,
00:38:14.440 but also,
00:38:15.480 you know,
00:38:16.540 deepen our market
00:38:17.420 access in China.
00:38:18.540 But is it not true
00:38:19.760 that if we're
00:38:20.580 more economically
00:38:21.860 dependent on China,
00:38:22.900 then we are
00:38:23.640 more dependent
00:38:24.380 on China?
00:38:26.280 Yeah, I mean,
00:38:27.160 China functions
00:38:27.940 as an integrated
00:38:29.320 party, state,
00:38:31.560 military,
00:38:32.520 business complex.
00:38:34.980 So, you know,
00:38:36.200 China always does
00:38:37.580 things for a reason.
00:38:38.760 So when you see
00:38:39.620 China providing
00:38:41.460 enormous investment
00:38:43.340 in some third world
00:38:46.280 ports along
00:38:47.520 the Belt and Road
00:38:49.360 Initiative,
00:38:50.340 then you cannot
00:38:51.180 help but think
00:38:52.060 that, you know,
00:38:53.620 that's not just
00:38:54.360 about improving
00:38:56.180 port facilities
00:38:57.080 to get Chinese
00:38:58.100 natural,
00:38:58.840 to get third
00:39:00.420 country natural
00:39:02.700 resources to China
00:39:04.140 to feed China's
00:39:05.120 growth,
00:39:05.920 but that over time
00:39:07.340 China will likely
00:39:08.920 ask that,
00:39:09.840 you know,
00:39:11.020 maybe Chinese
00:39:12.100 submarines could
00:39:13.540 come into those
00:39:15.160 ports or that
00:39:16.080 perhaps China
00:39:17.180 could establish
00:39:17.940 a military base
00:39:19.060 next to those
00:39:20.380 ports.
00:39:20.780 and a lot
00:39:21.680 of the Chinese
00:39:22.180 funding for
00:39:22.840 these things
00:39:23.500 has been
00:39:25.020 generous,
00:39:26.980 not based on
00:39:28.400 sound principles
00:39:30.360 of economics,
00:39:31.380 but often
00:39:32.500 showing a
00:39:35.000 tolerance for
00:39:35.920 corruption by
00:39:37.620 the third world
00:39:38.580 country leaders
00:39:39.260 that then leads
00:39:40.040 to that country
00:39:41.420 getting into debt,
00:39:42.740 which then further
00:39:43.520 increases China's
00:39:44.660 leverage over them
00:39:45.520 and has led
00:39:46.780 in some cases
00:39:47.720 to China taking
00:39:48.640 on long
00:39:50.160 leases,
00:39:50.660 typically 99-year
00:39:51.680 leases on
00:39:53.860 these port
00:39:55.000 facilities,
00:39:55.960 which then,
00:39:56.860 you know,
00:39:57.520 really would
00:39:58.080 provide China
00:39:58.880 with a
00:39:59.280 geostrategic
00:40:00.180 possibility.
00:40:01.600 So, you know,
00:40:02.640 the more we
00:40:03.400 become dependent
00:40:04.520 on our trade
00:40:05.760 with China,
00:40:06.320 the more leverage
00:40:07.080 China has to
00:40:08.280 insist that we
00:40:09.660 comply with
00:40:10.360 China's demands
00:40:11.180 that could be
00:40:11.860 damaging to our
00:40:13.420 geopolitics.
00:40:14.620 We've seen
00:40:15.500 that with
00:40:16.500 the Chinese
00:40:17.400 ambassador
00:40:18.040 being very
00:40:20.620 dismissive of
00:40:21.680 Canada's
00:40:22.400 foreign investment
00:40:23.320 review process,
00:40:24.540 suggesting that
00:40:26.260 Canada really
00:40:27.240 should allow,
00:40:28.180 say, the
00:40:29.340 Huawei 5G
00:40:31.020 hardware and
00:40:32.580 software into
00:40:33.700 our Canadian
00:40:34.600 telecommunications
00:40:35.660 and that we
00:40:36.360 shouldn't be
00:40:37.460 restricting
00:40:38.400 China's acquisition
00:40:39.780 of Canadian
00:40:41.040 firms that
00:40:41.880 have technologies
00:40:44.980 that have a
00:40:45.600 dual-use
00:40:46.260 military-civil
00:40:48.800 application and
00:40:50.980 that we should
00:40:51.480 be allowing
00:40:52.000 China complete
00:40:53.680 and free access
00:40:54.440 to investment
00:40:56.000 in Canadian
00:40:57.340 infrastructure and
00:40:58.640 mines and,
00:41:00.680 you know,
00:41:01.000 the ACON
00:41:01.520 construction,
00:41:02.860 which came
00:41:04.240 close to being
00:41:04.880 acquired by a
00:41:05.720 Chinese state
00:41:06.300 firm, which
00:41:07.740 would have
00:41:08.200 given, you
00:41:08.880 know, China a
00:41:09.480 lot of advantages
00:41:10.200 in terms of
00:41:11.360 knowledge of
00:41:11.860 our infrastructure
00:41:12.600 and ability to
00:41:15.020 have information
00:41:16.080 that could be
00:41:16.780 very critically
00:41:17.840 useful to
00:41:18.440 China if
00:41:19.440 there is a
00:41:20.180 conflict between
00:41:21.560 China and the
00:41:22.260 West in years
00:41:23.120 ahead, possibly
00:41:24.240 over Taiwan or
00:41:25.180 something else.
00:41:25.940 So, you know,
00:41:26.860 the more that
00:41:27.520 we allow China
00:41:29.800 to invest in
00:41:30.440 Canada, the
00:41:30.980 more we become
00:41:31.740 dependent on
00:41:32.520 China, the
00:41:33.480 more possibilities
00:41:34.320 there are for
00:41:35.180 China to, in
00:41:36.520 the context of
00:41:37.380 its increasing
00:41:38.260 comprehensive rise
00:41:39.500 to power, to
00:41:40.840 coerce us in
00:41:42.920 ways which would
00:41:44.180 be damaging to
00:41:45.120 our sovereignty,
00:41:46.620 security, and
00:41:47.380 alliance with our
00:41:48.740 partners.
00:41:49.360 So, you know,
00:41:50.260 obviously it's a
00:41:51.080 very good idea
00:41:51.840 for us to try
00:41:52.900 and seek markets
00:41:54.140 elsewhere to
00:41:55.660 diversify our
00:41:56.620 risk and to
00:41:59.300 ensure that we
00:42:00.920 don't see
00:42:01.440 ourselves drawn
00:42:02.340 into a
00:42:02.960 situation that
00:42:04.500 would be very
00:42:05.580 economically
00:42:06.440 damaging for
00:42:07.340 Canada to get
00:42:08.080 out of.
00:42:08.520 How much of
00:42:09.360 our struggle
00:42:09.900 is simply a
00:42:11.660 matter of
00:42:11.980 cultural difference?
00:42:12.860 I mean, Canada
00:42:13.280 is a very young
00:42:14.000 country compared
00:42:15.300 to China, which
00:42:16.660 is a millennia
00:42:17.720 old society.
00:42:20.060 You know, are
00:42:20.920 they playing at a
00:42:21.720 much longer and
00:42:23.000 larger game than
00:42:24.000 we're even able to
00:42:25.500 comprehend?
00:42:26.100 And is that part of
00:42:26.800 the reason why we
00:42:28.500 perhaps are naive
00:42:29.740 about what can be
00:42:30.580 accomplished vis-a-vis
00:42:31.640 China?
00:42:33.800 Yeah, I think so.
00:42:35.300 You know, I mean,
00:42:36.000 certainly the sense
00:42:37.820 of history is
00:42:38.660 there.
00:42:39.060 I think Mr.
00:42:39.720 Xi sees himself
00:42:41.460 not just as, you
00:42:42.760 know, a possible
00:42:43.560 acolyte of
00:42:46.520 Stalin, but as
00:42:48.500 someone following
00:42:49.820 the path of the
00:42:51.240 first emperor of
00:42:52.060 the Qin in
00:42:52.740 221 BC.
00:42:55.120 You know, so I
00:42:56.780 think that there
00:42:57.320 is this sense of
00:42:58.680 China's historical
00:43:00.140 destiny and
00:43:01.060 seeing the, you
00:43:03.700 know, the
00:43:04.060 relative decline of
00:43:05.200 China in global
00:43:06.440 power as being a
00:43:07.600 blip in the longer
00:43:09.180 sense of history.
00:43:10.320 I do remember
00:43:11.920 when I was a
00:43:13.680 student in China
00:43:14.420 going to stay
00:43:15.800 with the family
00:43:17.540 of one of my
00:43:18.340 roommates in a
00:43:20.120 rural area of
00:43:20.860 China in Shandong
00:43:21.760 and, you know,
00:43:22.800 I was a sort of
00:43:23.860 conversation piece.
00:43:25.100 I said, gee, I
00:43:25.820 don't, I guess you
00:43:26.780 don't get too many
00:43:27.660 foreigners in these
00:43:28.700 parts.
00:43:30.020 And they said, no,
00:43:31.100 that's not the case
00:43:31.960 and made reference to
00:43:33.060 the Mongol hordes
00:43:34.540 out under
00:43:35.540 Genghis Khan, who
00:43:36.900 had passed through
00:43:37.560 the village in the
00:43:38.960 14th century.
00:43:40.060 So, you know, they
00:43:41.020 do have a sense of
00:43:42.400 history.
00:43:43.300 But I think, in
00:43:44.260 general, we don't
00:43:45.260 appreciate that, you
00:43:46.680 know, the
00:43:46.920 institutions are not
00:43:48.040 compatible.
00:43:49.440 Canadian universities,
00:43:50.780 you know, who have a
00:43:51.780 mandate for the
00:43:53.120 creation and
00:43:55.400 dissemination of
00:43:56.340 knowledge are
00:43:57.700 cooperating with
00:43:58.720 Chinese universities,
00:44:00.380 assuming that
00:44:01.280 Chinese universities
00:44:02.200 are similarly based
00:44:03.480 on the principle
00:44:04.800 of the neutral
00:44:06.080 advance of
00:44:06.840 knowledge and
00:44:07.460 science, whereas
00:44:08.700 Chinese universities
00:44:09.520 are all functions
00:44:10.520 of the Chinese
00:44:11.300 state.
00:44:12.240 The professors are
00:44:13.100 all civil servants
00:44:15.060 and subject to
00:44:16.400 direction by the
00:44:17.760 Chinese Communist
00:44:18.420 Party.
00:44:19.540 And when Chinese
00:44:20.240 scholars collaborate
00:44:21.480 with Canadian
00:44:22.280 scholars, it's
00:44:23.100 often in areas of
00:44:24.800 dual-use military
00:44:25.800 technologies where
00:44:27.440 they are attempting
00:44:29.200 attempting to obtain
00:44:30.640 technologies of use
00:44:32.280 to the Chinese
00:44:33.180 Communist Party's
00:44:34.500 People's Liberation
00:44:35.660 Army, and that
00:44:37.140 our universities are
00:44:38.380 happy to see our
00:44:40.860 intellectual property
00:44:41.880 be transferred to
00:44:43.140 China because the
00:44:43.920 universities are
00:44:44.580 interested simply in
00:44:45.680 pushing forward the
00:44:46.900 bounds of science.
00:44:48.040 They're not so
00:44:48.780 interested in what
00:44:49.440 happens with the
00:44:50.380 technology.
00:44:51.140 So, you know, it's
00:44:52.340 these kind of, I
00:44:53.080 guess, similar to
00:44:53.880 false cognates in
00:44:55.160 language where we
00:44:56.540 assume that Chinese
00:44:57.680 institutions are
00:44:58.840 comparable to our
00:44:59.860 own, and they
00:45:00.440 aren't.
00:45:01.260 You know, the
00:45:02.300 Canadian Parliamentary
00:45:04.180 Exchange with the
00:45:05.540 National People's
00:45:06.420 Congress, I mean,
00:45:07.320 the National People's
00:45:08.120 Congress is simply
00:45:09.820 a rubber-stamp
00:45:11.300 legislature subject
00:45:12.620 to the authority of
00:45:13.580 the Chinese Communist
00:45:14.320 Party.
00:45:15.320 The members of the
00:45:16.100 National People's
00:45:16.880 Congress have no
00:45:17.960 constituency
00:45:18.500 responsibilities because
00:45:20.460 they are not
00:45:21.240 elected but, you
00:45:22.620 know, assigned by
00:45:23.480 the organization
00:45:24.300 department of the
00:45:25.760 Chinese Communist
00:45:26.320 Party through
00:45:26.960 various processes.
00:45:28.540 So, the idea that
00:45:29.960 we could have an
00:45:31.540 exchange between our
00:45:32.860 democratic
00:45:33.340 parliamentarians and
00:45:34.620 China's parliament
00:45:35.380 is absurd.
00:45:36.660 It simply provides
00:45:37.840 legitimacy and
00:45:39.400 false understanding
00:45:41.840 of China's civil
00:45:43.500 political institutions
00:45:44.720 which allows them to
00:45:47.240 deceive Canada about
00:45:49.000 China's overall
00:45:50.220 intentions.
00:45:51.080 And, you know, I
00:45:51.740 think we have to be
00:45:52.600 more aware of this,
00:45:54.180 but right now, you
00:45:55.340 know, Canadians are in
00:45:56.940 general and naive and
00:45:58.180 perhaps greedy people
00:45:59.820 who are not
00:46:01.700 prepared to face the
00:46:03.040 reality that our
00:46:04.680 engagement with China
00:46:05.700 is not as China
00:46:06.960 depicts it to us.
00:46:08.880 Dr. Burton, I feel
00:46:09.460 like we could have
00:46:10.120 gone on for probably
00:46:11.440 another whole 45
00:46:12.660 minutes, but
00:46:13.220 unfortunately we're
00:46:13.900 out of time.
00:46:14.960 We thank you a lot
00:46:16.020 for your insights
00:46:16.780 today and for joining
00:46:18.480 us and our listeners.
00:46:20.640 It's very good to
00:46:21.680 speak with you.
00:46:22.680 Full Comment is a
00:46:23.500 post-media podcast.
00:46:24.460 I'm guest host
00:46:25.780 Jackson Dohert.
00:46:26.840 This episode was
00:46:27.620 produced by Henri
00:46:28.520 Pou with theme
00:46:29.880 music by Bryce
00:46:30.940 Hall.
00:46:31.920 Kevin Libin is the
00:46:32.820 executive producer.
00:46:34.280 You can subscribe to
00:46:35.180 Full Comment on Apple
00:46:36.100 Podcasts, Google,
00:46:37.600 Spotify, and Amazon
00:46:38.740 Music.
00:46:39.500 You can listen through
00:46:40.420 the app or your
00:46:41.340 Alexa-enabled devices.
00:46:43.560 And you can help us by
00:46:44.740 giving us a rating or
00:46:46.000 leaving a review and by
00:46:47.680 telling your friends
00:46:48.200 about us.
00:46:48.960 Thanks for listening.
00:46:54.460 Thank you.