Full Comment - July 25, 2022


‘Used by the CBC’: Wendy Mesley after the ‘n-word’ incident


Episode Stats

Length

44 minutes

Words per Minute

188.71979

Word Count

8,374

Sentence Count

457

Misogynist Sentences

13

Hate Speech Sentences

16


Summary

For many years, broadcaster Wendy Mesley was a fixture on the televisions of Canadian households, bringing families the news as a host of popular shows Undercurrents, Marketplace, and The National, all on the CBC, where she worked for 38 years until her departure last year. Now, she is the host with Maureen Holloway of the podcast Women of Ill Repute, which is described as being about people who don t give a damn about the old rules.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Ontario. The wait is over. The gold standard of online casinos has arrived. Golden Nugget
00:00:06.000 Online Casino is live, bringing Vegas-style excitement and a world-class gaming experience
00:00:11.040 right to your fingertips. Whether you're a seasoned player or just starting, signing up is fast and
00:00:16.680 simple. And in just a few clicks, you can have access to our exclusive library of the best slots
00:00:21.740 and top-tier table games. Make the most of your downtime with unbeatable promotions and jackpots
00:00:27.220 that can turn any mundane moment into a golden opportunity at Golden Nugget Online Casino.
00:00:32.820 Take a spin on the slots, challenge yourself at the tables, or join a live dealer game to feel the
00:00:37.920 thrill of real-time action, all from the comfort of your own devices. Why settle for less when you
00:00:43.140 can go for the gold at Golden Nugget Online Casino? Gambling problem? Call ConnexOntario
00:00:49.080 1-866-531-2600. 19 and over. Physically present in Ontario. Eligibility restrictions apply. See
00:00:56.340 goldennuggetcasino.com for details. Please play responsibly.
00:00:59.720 Bank more encores when you switch to a Scotiabank banking package. Learn more at
00:01:08.120 scotiabank.com slash banking packages. Conditions apply. Scotiabank. You're richer than you think.
00:01:14.900 When I found out my friend got a great deal on a wool coat from Winners, I started wondering,
00:01:20.460 is every fabulous item I see from Winners? Like that woman over there with the designer jeans.
00:01:25.980 Are those from Winners? Ooh, or those beautiful gold earrings? Did she pay full price? Or that
00:01:31.880 leather tote? Or that cashmere sweater? Or those knee-high boots? That dress? That jacket? Those
00:01:36.960 shoes? Is anyone paying full price for anything? Stop wondering. Start winning. Winners. Find
00:01:43.760 fabulous for less.
00:01:44.920 Hello, I'm Anthony Fury. Thanks for joining us for the latest episode of Full Comet. If you haven't
00:01:56.360 done so already, please consider subscribing. For many years, broadcaster Wendy Mesley was a fixture
00:02:01.900 on the televisions of Canadian households, bringing families the news as a host of popular shows
00:02:06.500 Undercurrents, Marketplace, and The National, all on the CBC, where she worked for 38 years until her
00:02:12.280 departure from that network last year. A remarkable career during a time that saw incredible changes
00:02:17.020 in the media landscape. Now, Wendy Mesley is the host with Maureen Holloway of a new show,
00:02:21.960 the podcast Women of Ill Repute, which is described as being about people who don't give a damn
00:02:28.340 about the old rules. Wendy joins us today to talk about her career, her new show, the state of media
00:02:34.120 today in Canada, including the future of the CBC, and so much more. Wendy Mesley, welcome to the
00:02:39.440 program. Thank you so much for joining us today. Oh, you're very, very welcome. Lovely to be here,
00:02:44.420 Anthony. How are you? I am doing well, and how are you? Good. I'm so happy to hear you mention
00:02:49.540 Undercurrents, because that was my favorite show. I love doing that show. I had been a political
00:02:54.820 reporter forever, and I thought that there weren't really people who were investigating media or
00:03:00.580 marketing or advertising or all of that stuff, and I thought, woohoo! And of course, I soon learned
00:03:06.000 why no other network was doing that was because I was attacking my colleagues and attacking
00:03:10.580 advertisers and so on, but it was great while it lasted, and CBC, God bless them for that.
00:03:17.980 They let me do that show, so thank you for mentioning that. That was my favorite.
00:03:22.140 And you know, it's funny, because I guess sometimes the things that people consider their own career
00:03:26.620 highlights, you know, people they've interviewed or places they've gone to are not necessarily what
00:03:30.840 the public would think. Like you say, oh, this was the prime minister or what have you. Well, no,
00:03:33.920 it was actually this or that. What sort of anecdotes or interviews do you chalk as your
00:03:41.120 favorites that perhaps we wouldn't first think of? You know what? I think that's everybody's
00:03:45.960 or so many people's first question, and definitely a favorite question. And I'm terrible. I used to
00:03:51.500 think it was a guy thing, but I don't think it is. I think it's just a person. I don't know. I mean,
00:03:57.620 there's certain interviews that I remember. Like, I remember asking Jean Chrétien why his face was
00:04:03.340 half frozen, that nobody, everybody talked about, but nobody ever asked him. And he gave me an honest
00:04:07.680 answer. Like, I remember, he said, yeah, I had this disease when I was a kid. And now, you know,
00:04:12.640 I talked to this other ear, and I hear better through that. And, and, and on we go. So I thought
00:04:17.300 that was, like, I remember weird little moments, as opposed to, like, I always wanted to interview
00:04:22.940 Dolly Parton. And I, at one point at CBC, they said, who of all the people in the world,
00:04:28.660 we're doing something to fill time in the summer, when no one's spending any money. But who of all
00:04:35.220 the people in the world, would you like to interview? And I said, Dolly Parton, this is
00:04:38.020 like 10 years ago. And she wouldn't do it, wouldn't do it, wouldn't do it. And then finally said, I won't
00:04:44.040 come up and do it, or I won't meet you and do it. But you can come to, what's it called?
00:04:47.920 Dollywood. Yeah. And it was when I had booked to go away on holidays, and I couldn't go. And it was
00:04:54.600 awful. So that was my big, my big chance. So yeah, I guess I probably would have remembered every word
00:05:00.300 of that interview, but it never happened. She does strike me as a genuinely just decent human being,
00:05:04.860 Dolly Parton. I know. Yeah. And she's such, you know, I mean, the fake boobs and all which, you know,
00:05:11.120 as women were 50 years ago, raised to think, you know, anything you do to enhance your, you should
00:05:17.020 never do any of that. But she did it. She was open about it. Her music is great. She can write
00:05:21.660 a song in five minutes. And she's, she's just such an inspiration. I'm not a big music person,
00:05:27.960 which Maureen Holloway, my co host on the new podcast that we're doing points out to me all
00:05:33.960 the time that I am really a mutant when it comes to pop culture. But to me, Dolly is such a,
00:05:39.780 such a great character. She's just she's she's used she's she's brilliant. And she's a brilliant
00:05:45.320 business person. And she's used her life to make life better for other people. So kind of a cool
00:05:49.840 person. You know, Wendy asking, How are you doing now? I'm sure there's a lot of people who who
00:05:53.620 approach you and probably ask you that question, just because they're so used to you being in the
00:05:57.860 background of their lives with television on seeing you every day. They haven't seen you for for well
00:06:02.120 over a year. And they're probably coming up to you on the streets and saying, How you doing,
00:06:05.120 Wendy? Well, it's weird, like people, most of the people who come up to me are over 40,
00:06:10.920 because it seems that mainstream media now is only watched by people over 40, or maybe even older.
00:06:18.480 So yeah, no, I'm doing fine. I it was, it was a heartbreaking thing that I went through it at CBC.
00:06:25.900 I mean, I can talk about that I can, I wouldn't mind actually telling you what happened. Because
00:06:31.320 for a year, I didn't, didn't stand up for myself and didn't say anything and sort of hope that things
00:06:36.500 would get better. And, and I think I was used by CBC to basically say, we have a racism problem,
00:06:44.100 and it's her. So let's all hate her. So yeah, basically, what happened was I was on a phone
00:06:50.180 call, preparing a show. George Floyd had been murdered by the cops. A week earlier, we were
00:06:57.240 doing something on racism in Canadian media. And we had three black people who were going to come on to
00:07:03.700 the journalists who were going to come on and talk about what it was like in journalism. And
00:07:07.760 anyway, so we were I was talking with other producers on the phone, because it was COVID time,
00:07:11.560 the beginning of COVID time. And anyway, I was outraged that this woman who was going to be on
00:07:17.120 our panel, this journalist had said that she was called that all the time. And anyway, I was outraged
00:07:22.300 by this and kept going on. She was called the N word all the time.
00:07:25.820 She was called the N word all she said she was called this all the time. So I wanted that to be part
00:07:30.680 of our panel discussion. And I think I used the N word in the first reference. And then I used the
00:07:38.800 whole word and because I got caught up in the moment, and I shouldn't have used it. And I realized
00:07:42.720 immediately that I'd hurt people. And I apologized for using the word because I should have known
00:07:48.540 better. But it turned into like the next year, I was basically portrayed by my employer of almost 40
00:07:55.260 years as, as being a racist, and they never stood up for me. And so I and I never fought for myself.
00:08:02.160 So I think I it kind of broke my heart, actually, it was extremely, extremely difficult. So that took
00:08:09.520 a year to resolve that. And during that, I got sick, and my mom died, and a whole bunch of other
00:08:13.520 shitty stuff happened. And then finally, we parted ways, shall we say, and, and now I'm doing this
00:08:21.780 podcast. So I'm sort of a broadcaster, but I'm more of a podcaster, not making any money. But
00:08:26.820 if you want to sign up, please do. We're looking for sponsors, we're looking for like big bags of
00:08:33.420 money to fall from the sky. So I'm, I'm fine now. But it was, it was a rather rough thing to go through
00:08:38.780 when you look back on that period. And you kind of say, you know, I didn't say it on the air. I, I
00:08:44.520 apologize, because I had hurt people and should have known better. And I deserve to be punished. But I
00:08:50.200 didn't deserve the punishment that I got, which was basically losing all credibility and my reputation
00:08:55.020 and my job and my show and everything else at CBC. So, wow. And losing your mother as well. I'm
00:09:01.160 sorry to hear about that very difficult. Yeah, well, it's funny, I wrote, I think you want to ask me
00:09:06.640 about the piece that I wrote for the Globe, more than a year ago, but I wrote another piece that got
00:09:13.080 published on Mother's Day. So recently. And it was about my mother as being the original woman of ill
00:09:20.600 repute. Because she basically raised me, she left my dad, who I revealed in that piece was gay. Back in
00:09:27.980 those days, it was illegal to be gay. He was going to go through psychotherapy or whatever, and see a
00:09:33.860 psychiatrist and learn how not to be gay as if that's a thing. Anyway, so obviously, their marriage
00:09:39.700 did not work out. But somehow I happened. And so I wrote about how she basically went on and
00:09:46.780 formed a life for herself and for me, after leaving him and how she was the original woman of ill repute
00:09:54.760 and that, you know, she wasn't, it took her seven years to get custody of me and to get a divorce. And
00:10:01.200 by the time she could date, she was in her 30s. And in those days, if you weren't married by 30,
00:10:07.160 you're a spinster. So anyway, she never remarried. And she raised me to fight for myself and to think
00:10:14.300 a little bit differently than a lot of women were raised to think in those days. And yeah, so I,
00:10:21.760 I, yeah, it was, it was difficult losing her, but she had dementia. So she was sort of slipping away
00:10:28.360 gradually. It was not, not a shock. When she died.
00:10:34.120 There's so much to unpack about what you discussed there about your departure from CBC. One thing I
00:10:40.660 found interesting, you mentioned, and a year later, so there was the incident, the meeting,
00:10:44.840 which you promptly apologized for, realized you'd misspoken. And then a year later, you feel like
00:10:51.940 you're sort of the fall guy, the fall gal for this racism at the CBC issue. How is that something that
00:10:58.000 took it?
00:10:58.340 No, it didn't take a year. I, yeah, no, I felt that pretty immediately when it turned into,
00:11:03.300 like, two or three days in when I realized that it was going to be an HR and a union thing,
00:11:10.300 and that they were going to basically allow everybody who wanted to portray me as a racist
00:11:15.400 to portray me as a racist. That, like, I was mad from, or I was upset, mad at myself,
00:11:22.880 but also mad at CBC very early on. But when you work for CBC, you can either, and something happens,
00:11:31.720 you can either go with the process and try and figure it out and hope that, that, you know,
00:11:37.320 after 40 years, and, and it had its own problems with systemic racism, of which it was accused
00:11:44.040 publicly at the CRTC and other places by CBC employees, you would hope that I had hoped that
00:11:51.240 things could be worked out and that I could actually return. And it took, it took a year,
00:11:55.500 but you can't fight, you can't say anything, you can't fight for yourself, you can't say anything
00:11:59.380 publicly. So it took a year for me to say, okay, this is not going to work. We, neither of us sees
00:12:05.300 the future here. So I'm going to leave. So it took a year for me to say, I'm going to leave and to have
00:12:11.000 the freedom to be able to say, I think the treatment of me was inappropriate. And, uh, I'm,
00:12:17.560 uh, I'm a free person and, uh, I didn't agree to a gag order for whatever money might've been
00:12:23.360 involved. And, uh, I'm free, obviously, or I wouldn't be speaking to you. Um, uh, that took a
00:12:30.200 year. It didn't take me a year to figure out that, uh, CBC and I, uh, were not in good terms.
00:12:35.320 So basically you were being spoken about by people for a whole year and, and I guess perhaps
00:12:40.140 misrepresented or smeared or called names for about a year on social media or the rumor mill
00:12:44.660 in the industry. And you're someone who's used to telling stories, telling people's stories for,
00:12:49.400 for many years. And you couldn't tell your own story at that point while other people
00:12:53.460 were, were speaking about you and speaking for you.
00:12:56.540 Well, I mean, this is a much broader discussion. I don't want to talk about smears or whatever,
00:13:00.820 but, um, uh, it is, it is a broader discussion of what's happening in social media is that,
00:13:06.420 you know, like my, so many normal people, like everyday people who are not in the media,
00:13:12.380 uh, they had no idea what happened cause they're, they're not on, on Twitter or Insta or other
00:13:18.060 places that I was being denounced or even watching the national, which sort of denounced me on air a
00:13:23.020 few times. Um, yeah. Um, but I think that it's generally what's happening in media,
00:13:30.680 is that people just read what their friends believe and, uh, and we're basically being
00:13:37.760 taught to hate each other. But during that whole period, yeah. I mean, people were saying all kinds
00:13:41.980 of ridiculous things about me that, and, and, and even other journalists believe that I had actually
00:13:47.700 called somebody the N word. Like I would never, I never have my long life. I have never called
00:13:54.500 anybody that. And I, I thought I had a reputation for fighting for underdogs and, uh, for not being
00:14:01.160 someone that would ever call somebody, uh, uh, a name. Um, I used the word, uh, and I thought I was
00:14:08.340 being supportive and outraged that somebody had actually been called that word, but, uh, but I
00:14:13.480 shouldn't have used it and I apologized. And I think, yeah. So I kept quiet for a year thinking that
00:14:17.980 CBC and I would, would work things out, but, uh, but we didn't. So it took me a year to rant.
00:14:23.820 And it's crazy to think that there's stories about your departure, but all the facts aren't
00:14:27.640 filled in, or there's a segment about you on the national. Uh, and again, the facts aren't filled
00:14:31.860 in. So people are left going, well, what did she do? Yeah. Well, somebody said to me, a friend of
00:14:36.440 mine said, well, because you didn't speak out because you didn't fight for yourself, uh, people think
00:14:42.120 that, uh, the absolute worst must've happened, that it must've been way worse than what actually
00:14:46.640 happened. Um, and it's true. I mean, I think that is my biggest regret is that I, my mom taught me to,
00:14:52.960 to fight for myself. Um, and I didn't, I didn't, I didn't fight for myself, but if I, if I had,
00:14:58.460 I would have had to have left the CBC grieved the, the, the, uh, punishment that was given me. I would
00:15:05.240 have had to have, uh, sued them. And I just, that was, I don't, or, you know, I could have gone the
00:15:11.380 other way and attacked the people who didn't know what had happened and who had made all
00:15:16.540 kinds of assumptions and were using me to fight a cause. Um, and we're making assumptions about me
00:15:22.040 based on stuff that they didn't know, but I didn't want to attack them either. I didn't really want to
00:15:25.800 attack either the place I had worked for 40 years or for the people who were fighting for issues that
00:15:31.140 actually mattered a lot to me. So, uh, so I, yeah, I felt like the best thing I can do is, uh, try and,
00:15:38.420 and work this out. And then I realized that was not going to happen.
00:15:41.480 It seems definitely very bureaucratic, antiseptic, ungenerous to not discuss the
00:15:47.300 nuances of your situation. Um, that appear, it seems that that's what happened in the HR
00:15:53.740 scenario there, where I know there's debates over, is it acceptable to say this word as an
00:15:58.420 example of a word one shouldn't say, you know, people talk about different nuances. Well, it's
00:16:02.740 said in lyrics to songs all the time, kind of thing. You're just using it as example of a word
00:16:07.160 you disapprove of and so forth. And it's like, to your point, this word was not said in hostility.
00:16:12.020 You weren't aiming it towards anyone. You were speaking about it disapprovingly and you've
00:16:17.120 acknowledged, you feel you shouldn't have said it, you've apologized for it. And yet you still need
00:16:21.340 to lose everything. It's kind of like, where was the nuance in all of that?
00:16:27.480 Yeah. Well, I, I, I don't think that there's any excuse for, for saying the word and I should
00:16:33.640 have known better. And that's why I apologize. And I, and I think that people do need to be
00:16:38.500 careful when they're hurting other people, you know, like my, I, uh, I take particular offense
00:16:43.640 to what's called the C word, which everybody knows, uh, as well as they know the N word. Um,
00:16:48.240 I would take particular offense to that. And my husband, you know, he's, uh, Irish and thinks
00:16:55.280 that that's, I think that that's a word that you call everybody that you think is being a dick
00:16:59.740 in a certain moment. Um, and he doesn't see it as offensive. So everybody sees things in
00:17:04.920 different ways and they can express themselves in different ways. I should have known better.
00:17:09.140 I never mean like, if I mean to hurt somebody, like when I was in marketplace and chasing crooked
00:17:14.640 contractors, I meant to hurt them, but I did not mean to hurt anybody by using that word. And I should
00:17:21.120 have known better. And I think, but I do think the context matters. There's a big difference between,
00:17:26.320 uh, fighting against somebody being called that and saying the word and calling somebody that,
00:17:31.280 which I would never have done in a million years. All right. And I guess I just mean that there was
00:17:36.480 no sense of that nuance in public discussion or reporting of you, or perhaps in the HR process,
00:17:41.800 it seemed to just be, okay, Wendy has to lose everything now. I, yeah, I don't want to speak for
00:17:46.940 them. I can speak for myself, but yeah. And I think I've explained sort of where I've come from.
00:17:54.440 So when you talk about the punishment you received, what, what was that punishment?
00:17:58.720 Uh, well, there are some points that, um, in my, uh, there are some points that I'm not sure that I
00:18:06.460 can speak about, but, uh, it, it was probably the largest punishment, uh, given out, uh, to anyone who
00:18:14.080 was not fired. Uh, and then I ended up losing my job and my show and whatever. Anyway, they, they,
00:18:19.180 uh, the, the, the punishment, uh, at CBC can be, um, uh, not being paid for a period of time. So I was
00:18:30.360 not paid for a period of time and I had to go to sensitivity training. Um, and my show was taken
00:18:36.480 away from me and I was ultimately offered another job, which was to go back and basically, you know,
00:18:43.360 do a job that I did when I was 20 years old, which is, you know, read somebody else's copy.
00:18:49.700 I want to get your thoughts on a story up at cbc.ca right now. Prominent Radio Canada
00:18:53.940 personalities urge broadcaster to fight CRTC N word decision. Basically there were a few occasions,
00:19:01.000 a number of occasions where a French Canadian employees of, of Radio Canada, part of CBC,
00:19:06.480 uh, had used the N word, I guess in a similar way that, that, that you had in terms of not
00:19:13.380 using it, uh, rudely to a person, but just as an example word, uh, they said this on the air.
00:19:19.600 I know it was established. You said it in a meeting and there was a complaint filed against them
00:19:25.060 and they're saying they want CBC to fight for them. These broadcasters and a lot of, uh, prominent
00:19:31.280 French broadcasters are standing up and saying, yes, you must fight for us, uh, to not receive
00:19:35.760 great punishments for this. I know they often do things differently in Quebec in a number of ways
00:19:40.020 than we do here in English Canada. What do you make of this story? Um, I don't want to make a
00:19:45.440 pronouncement about what Radio Canada or CBC should do, but I have two comments. One is that, uh, nearly
00:19:52.960 all of the people who are saying, how dare the CRTC get involved in this, uh, free speech, uh, debate
00:20:00.020 and tell Reggie Canada what to say. Um, all of those people are 50 and older and there's a lot of
00:20:07.780 people and white, um, maybe not all of them, but I, but pretty much so. And I happen to know a lot of
00:20:15.620 people under 50 and a few people under 50 who are not white, who work at Reggie Canada and are not
00:20:22.000 supportive and think that, that nuance does matter. And there was no nuance, um, expressed in that show,
00:20:27.600 acknowledging that saying the word, um, could have, um, harmful or hurtful effects on people.
00:20:35.540 So there's that. And I would also like to point out that, uh, there was a complaint, uh, made, uh,
00:20:42.800 at CBC during this whole inward thing at CBC, as opposed to Reggie Canada back in the day when I
00:20:48.260 said the word on the telephone, uh, to staff members, um, not accusing anyone of being that,
00:20:55.460 but being upset that somebody was called that. Uh, so the ombudsman at CBC looked into it and wrote
00:21:00.320 a report and nobody noticed that because there was a lot of blah, blah, blah, as there always is
00:21:06.300 in ombuds people's reports, wherever, wherever the institution is. Um, but they also said that, uh,
00:21:14.160 that the CBC broke its own ethical guidelines for, uh, uh, how they, how they covered what happened
00:21:20.800 to me. So, uh, yeah, there, there is, there is a difference. CBC decided to make an example out of
00:21:27.580 me, even though if you look at all of the senior management, or if you look at all the things that
00:21:31.960 were said about, uh, CBC at the time and its own problems with, uh, with racism, um, there,
00:21:38.600 they decided to, uh, um, you know, take advantage of, of, uh, of my using the word and, and my
00:21:47.140 celebrity, I guess, Canadian style celebrity for whatever it's worth. Um, and, uh, there was a
00:21:53.700 very different approach at, uh, at Radio Canada. We'll be back with more full comment in just a
00:21:59.860 moment. Did you lock the front door? Check. Close the garage door? Yep. Installed window sensors,
00:22:08.180 smoke sensors, and HD cameras with night vision? No. And you set up credit card transaction alerts,
00:22:13.340 a secure VPN for a private connection, and continuous monitoring for our personal info on the
00:22:17.020 dark web? Uh, I'm looking into it. Stress less about security. Choose security solutions from
00:22:23.720 TELUS for peace of mind at home and online. Visit telus.com slash total security to learn more.
00:22:29.780 Conditions apply. Wait, I didn't get charged for my donut. It was free with this Tim's Rewards points.
00:22:37.280 I think I just stole it. I'm a donut stealer. Earn points so fast, it'll seem too good to be true.
00:22:44.120 Plus, join Tim's Rewards today and get enough points for a free donut, drink, or Timbits. With 800
00:22:49.900 points after registration, activation, and first purchase of a dollar or more, see the Tim's app
00:22:53.760 for details at participating restaurants in Canada for a limited time.
00:22:59.280 What are the new technologies that will change aviation? Well, hydrogen would be one for sure if,
00:23:05.220 if we got there. I mean, hydrogen is not just a, uh, alternative fuel. I mean, hydrogen would change,
00:23:10.440 would change it significantly if we ever managed to break the back of that.
00:23:13.980 Today, I'm speaking with Kalen Rovinescu, the former president of Air Canada and a trailblazer
00:23:21.380 in global aviation. Join me, Chris Hadfield, on the On Energy podcast.
00:23:27.300 Listen wherever you get your podcasts.
00:23:30.800 Wendy, you mentioned CBC's problems with racism. CBC is a large organization,
00:23:35.440 many employees. Are the problems that CBC has faced, uh, particularly greater than at other
00:23:42.400 institutions? What, what is unique or specific to CBC's challenges as opposed to the challenges that,
00:23:49.380 that other organizations might face with racism?
00:23:51.980 It is a, um, excuse me, it is a, uh, unique situation, um, because I, I don't think that the
00:24:00.640 issue of diversity or bigotry or racism or whatever is any different or any worse, uh, it might actually
00:24:07.460 be better at CBC than a lot of places, but the, the difference is that, um, well, I guess there's
00:24:14.760 two differences. Um, the main difference is that because it's, um, uh, a crown corporation and because
00:24:24.100 it's subsidized by taxpayers, it has a responsibility to, uh, uh, when it does something bad to take
00:24:31.520 responsibility and try and make that better and to be accountable for that. Where, as if you're in,
00:24:37.200 uh, private media, you can make different decisions that don't have anything to do with,
00:24:44.280 uh, that have to do with your own morality as opposed to how others may, may see you. So there's
00:24:49.400 that difference. And there is also a very strong union at CBC, which means that all the old people,
00:24:53.900 like me, uh, had jobs that were protected forever and you would have had to have basically murdered
00:24:59.900 your boss on video, which existed in those days, um, uh, for you not to be supported. So,
00:25:08.000 and meanwhile, the, the government grants and the, and the audience were declining. And so people,
00:25:17.320 all of the old white people were supported and all of the young people who wanted to have jobs,
00:25:22.740 including people who were of color or some kind of diversity, uh, were, were trying to get in and
00:25:29.840 all there, there just weren't a lot of positions in a, in a shrinking mainstream media world. And so
00:25:35.260 like everybody, everybody is struggling and CBC tried extra hard, but they did,
00:25:40.680 they had racism problems. And part of what happened to me was there was a, um, diversity inclusion,
00:25:46.520 um, group that had been made all kinds of promises about how there was going to be changes in terms of
00:25:53.780 there would not just be old white people in terms of, uh, uh, senior management and that there would
00:25:59.320 be different rules in terms of what was considered a bias or a whole bunch of promises made. And this
00:26:05.780 group didn't feel like they were being delivered upon, especially after changes in management. And,
00:26:10.420 um, uh, so when I happened, when the thing with me happened, it was just like enough already and
00:26:17.380 George Floyd and COVID and everything else enough already enough, enough, enough. And so, um, it
00:26:23.280 became, it became very much an issue and there'd been a change in management and, uh, and, and a big
00:26:29.240 focus on, on, on trying to change things quickly. And I got swept up in all of that.
00:26:34.540 Um, speaking about CBC being a crown corporation, people having views about it, people have opinions
00:26:41.540 and passions about CBC that they just don't have about the other major networks. I guess the other
00:26:46.640 networks, they either, they either watch or they don't. And that's that CBC, there's friends of CBC
00:26:51.820 and organization. There are people who put, uh, little signs on their yard saying I'm a CBC supporter
00:26:57.100 on the other side, there are people who just love to criticize CBC and you can win an entire
00:27:01.280 conservative leadership race, just promising to trim the budget or even shut down the whole
00:27:05.020 operation. So strong are the passions felt on both sides. Do you think that's, that's fair? And how,
00:27:13.240 how did journalists in CBC respond to that atmosphere? Well, I think that, uh, a lot of people
00:27:23.120 have wanted to work for CBC, uh, because it has been such, especially as, as, as journalists,
00:27:30.780 um, and there is this, I mean, it used to be that, uh, there would be, I'm exaggerating, but there
00:27:38.640 would be like three crews showing up for, uh, CTVs, one crew and people would go, this is ridiculous.
00:27:43.880 Um, those were the good old days. Those, those days haven't existed for a long time. Uh, so now CBC,
00:27:51.800 while, uh, struggling like everybody else and while supported by the government, unlike everybody else,
00:27:59.100 it's, it's still struggling and its audience is shrinking and the dollars are shrinking, the demands,
00:28:03.680 the, the, uh, the, uh, demands to be, uh, in time zones across the country in different languages and
00:28:10.440 all of that. It's, uh, it, it's really difficult. Like I, I'm, I'm doing a podcast now because I,
00:28:16.900 I think that the mainstream media, uh, world is shrinking and changing. And some of that is natural
00:28:24.260 and some of that is good, but some of it is also because people, it used to be, you know,
00:28:29.360 like when I was a kid where there would be like three TV stations to watch. That was great. It
00:28:34.000 used to be in Quebec, there'd be three TV stations to watch and everybody watched the same thing. And,
00:28:37.780 and the culture was so cohesive. And now you've got YouTube and Instagram and Twitter and everything
00:28:43.120 else, TikTok, um, and, and culture is, is changing. And I think CBC feels very much that it's changing
00:28:51.360 and that it needs to get ad revenue. And that's creating problems with journalists who are saying,
00:28:55.060 why are you selling our journalism as, uh, as, uh, disguised as advertising, even if it's not that
00:29:01.540 clear, but it's, it's a changing world and everybody is struggling. Right. There's a new
00:29:07.260 announcement that there'll be a streaming service that is ad supported, uh, out of CBC. And I know
00:29:12.600 management feels passionate about this as an opportunity for new revenues, but there are a lot
00:29:16.240 of criticisms and concerns about whether a public broadcaster should be doing this. And I guess
00:29:20.780 questions about, should CBC be like BBC in the UK, this large empire, or should it be sort of
00:29:26.100 constrained more to be like an NPR type operation? Where do you see the future of CBC?
00:29:31.540 That's not for me to say, especially now. Um, but I, uh, I, I am very grateful for the
00:29:37.680 opportunities that CBC gave me. My first job actually was with CTV. Um, but at CBC, I was able to do,
00:29:44.640 I was able to do shows that, uh, basically spoke for the underdog and I was able to do,
00:29:50.780 I was able to, uh, have support in time to like when I first, like I was the first woman to cover
00:29:56.460 a prime minister for the CBC bureau, uh, on parliament hill. Um, that is an opportunity that
00:30:03.340 I am eternally grateful for. Um, so, you know, while things didn't end well for me and I'm mad at
00:30:10.700 CBC for the certain ways that they handled me in the end, I, I still think it's, I still think it's
00:30:16.860 necessary. And while there's so much positive stuff happening with social media and all of the
00:30:21.620 other, uh, changes that we've seen in the last 10, 20 years, um, I, I, I think there's a lot of good
00:30:30.520 and bad in both mainstream media and in, and in social media. And this is the world that we live in.
00:30:36.500 I love the title of the new podcast, women of ill repute. So far, your guests have been Mary Walsh,
00:30:43.700 Jody Wilson-Raybould, Jan Arden, your co-host Maureen Holloway. Are you all women of ill repute?
00:30:49.840 Yeah, well, that's one of the reasons I've always seen myself as a woman of ill repute,
00:30:54.220 which is meant to be a compliment, by the way, it has, it has nothing to do with, uh, my having,
00:30:59.840 uh, said the N word. And I thought defensive of, of black people and then realizing that I stupidly
00:31:06.600 realizing that I had, you know, hurt people and done the opposite. Um, but yeah, women of ill repute,
00:31:13.120 it has nothing to do with that. It has to do with, with fighting for things that you believe in and
00:31:18.400 not, uh, following perhaps the, the, you know, the roles or the rules that, that were set out for you.
00:31:25.080 So yeah, I mean, um, Maureen, what are those rules? What were the rules that you were supposed
00:31:30.120 to follow? Well, I don't want to anymore. I'm old now, so I'm hoping that the rules are changing,
00:31:35.520 but I, I, I have a, a daughter who's in her twenties and I have a lot of female friends who
00:31:40.600 are in their thirties and forties and fifties. And there are a lot of things that don't change.
00:31:44.120 And, and for Maureen, like she, she's a comedian. She did a, um, a morning show. She was on Q107
00:31:49.700 and on CHFI in Toronto, big, big, uh, morning shows in Toronto. And, but before that she was
00:31:55.140 a comedian and like, she was told, yeah, well, you're really funny and everything, but you know,
00:32:00.180 people don't really want to see funny women. They want to see funny men. Um, I was raised by
00:32:05.060 a woman who, you know, did not tell me to wear clean underwear and, uh, keep my bangs out of my
00:32:11.780 face and, uh, and smile and, and just be nice to everybody. I wasn't, I wasn't, my mother didn't teach me
00:32:18.820 that. And she taught me different things. Uh, she taught me how to fight for myself. She taught me
00:32:23.780 how to believe in things. She taught me to tell the truth, which, uh, I think there's a limit to,
00:32:28.900 like she actually told somebody that they've married a dork. I don't, I don't think, I don't
00:32:33.700 think that's necessary. So she probably went too far, but it's, uh, yeah, the old rules about how women
00:32:39.960 can't be funny. Women can't be ambitious women. Um, they have to be married. They can't get divorced,
00:32:46.260 all of those things. Um, they should always be smiling. Um, I think those things are getting
00:32:52.600 better for, uh, for women and, and for people in general. I think people just need to, um,
00:32:59.140 I think people need to fight for things that they believe in, even if they're not the standard rules.
00:33:03.780 And that's, you know, obviously what's happening in the States is different than what's happening
00:33:07.600 in Canada, but, uh, but that's what I, I don't, I don't reject all rules. I think some rules are,
00:33:13.240 are important and the rules are always changing. And I believe in challenging the status quo.
00:33:17.760 And I think I've done that in my career and I believe in, I believe in change. Like when I was
00:33:21.960 a kid, you know, people used to do jokes about gay people. Um, you don't do that anymore. You used
00:33:28.160 to do jokes about, uh, black people don't do that in Toronto anymore. It would bother me when I moved
00:33:34.080 to Quebec that people were still telling jokes about black people. I just, I think I've, I've fought
00:33:40.200 against that all my life. So when I talk about, uh, rules, those, those are the rules that I mean,
00:33:46.440 but I, I believe in, you know, trying to be kind and trying to be good and trying to listen to each
00:33:52.520 other. And, and I, I've, I've always tried to do that, but I'm human and I've made mistakes like
00:33:57.960 everybody else.
00:33:59.760 Who are some other voices we're going to hear from on this show? Cause I already see in the guests
00:34:04.120 you've had so far that, uh, one gets a sense of the, well, yeah, that, that these are people who
00:34:09.100 don't give a damn about the old rules.
00:34:11.840 Uh, yeah, well the next person up, she's coming out on, uh, Tuesday. So it's funny because we,
00:34:18.900 I guess women of ill repute is meant to be, it's meant to be a compliment, but it's also
00:34:23.300 like, we're not going to, uh, interview women who have not challenged the status quo in some way.
00:34:30.200 Um, but we're also interviewing women who we find to be admirable in some way. So, uh, I'm not going
00:34:36.680 to give you the whole list of, of people, but we're, we're talking to, uh, Marie Hennon, the lawyer.
00:34:42.420 So she's, uh, she defended, uh, Jean Gomeschi and, uh, he used to work at CBC of course, and, uh,
00:34:50.700 she defended him and he was found to be not guilty. Uh, and a lot of people say that the way that she
00:34:56.260 fought for him, uh, did a disservice to victims of sexual assault. So there, there's, but also
00:35:04.220 like murderers deserve to, to have a good defense that doesn't make their lawyer a murderer. Um,
00:35:10.820 so we talked to her about, um, about.
00:35:14.500 Well, you've teed me up some, I can't now ask you brought Gomeschi up. I didn't bring him up. Now
00:35:18.940 I have to ask you, what did you think about the Jean Gomeschi thing being a, at least a broader
00:35:24.600 colleague? Yeah, I never really knew him. So, uh, I had heard stories, but I never knew anything to
00:35:31.600 be real. So, uh, yeah, I'm hardly, hardly an expert on, on that situation. So sorry.
00:35:39.300 Well, and what did you think of that, that discussion? And I know you're just getting
00:35:42.600 into this before I interrupted you that Marie Hennon, like, would it have been different if a
00:35:47.440 male lawyer had said, well, I'm defending him because everybody deserves a defense. So I'm going to
00:35:50.880 defend him. But Marie Hennon, as, as a woman, somehow that wasn't acceptable.
00:35:56.960 Yeah. Uh, well, I found it very interesting that, that she was able,
00:36:04.840 she acknowledges in the interview and I, I, I, Maureen is going to kill me for giving too much
00:36:10.340 away here, but in the interview, she basically acknowledges that, that the system doesn't always
00:36:16.300 work for sexual assault victims. Um, and we know that most, not all women tell the truth, but
00:36:23.540 that the women who have actually been sexually assaulted, which often means rape, even though
00:36:29.180 that is not the word in law anymore, um, that they, uh, do not get a fair trial or they do not get a,
00:36:37.460 they do not get justice in the, in the system that very rarely, uh, do they come forward. And if they
00:36:43.060 do, I mean, I know lots of lawyers and judges who've said that, you know, if my daughter was
00:36:46.840 ever raped, I would not go through the process with her because she won't win. She'll just be
00:36:51.880 destroyed. So we, we talk about that. Um, and, and how, uh, it was, it was different for her as,
00:36:59.480 as a female lawyer who sees herself as a, as a feminist, even though she doesn't use that word,
00:37:04.860 um, to defend, uh, somebody like Gian Gomeschi. So, um, yeah, she was attacked as a woman and
00:37:14.080 also she was attacked as a woman for doing, uh, sexy photos of her, of her stuff. Like, really?
00:37:20.540 Like, it's just, I don't know, lawyers are, are supposed to all wear buttoned down suits. I don't
00:37:25.580 think so. So yeah, we talk about that sort of thing. Wendy, you've referenced social media a few
00:37:30.160 times here, and I do want to talk to you about just the nuts and bolts of news gathering,
00:37:34.320 reporting, how journalism has changed because increasingly I find, and while this has been
00:37:39.260 going on for maybe 10 years now, so many news stories now are just what's trending on social
00:37:43.220 media. Who said this on social media? Pretend everything, pretend life is 140 characters long.
00:37:48.700 You talked about the, the sort of viciousness that I guess we can sometimes be exposed to on there.
00:37:53.860 How has social media changed the general news media landscape and where is it headed?
00:37:59.840 Well, I remember back on my show undercurrents, which was like at least 20 years ago, um, boy,
00:38:09.140 20 odd years ago. And we did stories on the sort of the birth of, of social media and people's
00:38:15.200 fixations with celebrities. And, uh, I didn't realize that it would only explode from, from then.
00:38:21.940 And we sort of thought that, Oh, wow, look at this. Like everybody is, is obsessed now with what
00:38:27.280 celebrities are saying. Um, and now, you know, it's, it's the, Kim Kardashian's is the way too obvious
00:38:33.560 example, but it, it does seem that, uh, we're now being driven into these silos of which we've all
00:38:41.100 heard about the, um, uh, where we all hate each other. Um, as, uh, Roxanne Gay, who made a career
00:38:48.800 for herself on social media, uh, wrote a book recently saying, you know, it's, it's like everybody
00:38:54.220 is a hammer in search of a nail and that's, that's how it feels. Like I, I know that, uh, people don't
00:39:00.300 believe in objectivity anymore, but I still argue for that because I tried to be objective and people
00:39:06.080 would think that I, and obviously I do have personal opinions about things, but I always tried
00:39:10.320 to be fair to present two sides of an argument so that people could make, make up their own decision
00:39:17.300 about things. Um, and to me that was being objective and people would say, Oh no, no, no,
00:39:23.140 that doesn't make any sense. Just let everyone know what you think. And then they can figure out
00:39:27.880 whether they want to believe you or they want to believe somebody else. But that just basically
00:39:31.100 drives us into this polarized world that we're living in right now, where nobody even tries to tell
00:39:35.840 you, uh, what's actually happening. Instead, you just, you know, you read all your pals on whatever
00:39:40.960 social media posts you're on, or you read your, your favorite newspaper that supports what you want
00:39:45.440 to believe in. And, uh, and very few people make an effort to tell both sides of a story anymore. And,
00:39:51.760 uh, anyway, so it ends up that instead of talking to each other and trying to understand each other
00:39:56.740 and trying to learn from each other, uh, that we all hate each other, that we all say I'm right and
00:40:01.240 you're wrong, which is not very helpful. And it has led to the world that we're,
00:40:05.840 living in right now. On the other hand, you know, I remember being 12 years old and being so
00:40:12.560 bored. And if I had a question, I had to go to the library or look up on microfiche.
00:40:17.920 So, you know, it's way better that now I have an answer to, uh, Martha Mitchell. I remember her.
00:40:24.080 I just watched this series on gas lit on TV and Martha, John Mitchell and the whole Watergate thing.
00:40:28.820 Cause I'm a Watergate kid. It was happening when I was like 12, uh, and go back and read about that.
00:40:33.820 It's all on Google. I can watch stuff on YouTube. I can, if I'm on holidays, the first place I'll go
00:40:38.720 is Twitter because everything is there and I can put in a keyword and I can find stuff,
00:40:43.120 but I'm only being sent stuff that the algorithm says that I want to hear from. So, uh, I try and
00:40:49.960 keep my mind open and read people of all, you know, different opinions who I respect in different ways,
00:40:54.760 uh, to keep my brain full. Uh, so it's kind of wonderful. It's like, like I remember when video
00:41:00.060 games came along, that was going to kill it. You know, everybody was going to be a serial killer
00:41:03.580 because they were watching a video game. Or if you're old enough, you remember the debates about
00:41:08.120 how TV was going to ruin everyone's life and we're all going to become worse people. And, and maybe we
00:41:13.460 are, but TV, video games, and now social media for the last 20 years, um, they're kind of here to
00:41:20.300 stay. So I think we just have to, uh, try and find a way of still talking to each other and not
00:41:25.760 just talking to people that we agree with. Yeah. The whole, we're all hating each other thing.
00:41:30.100 I get the sense that traditional media is, is probably amplifying it or worsening it rather
00:41:34.620 than healing that. I don't know. Does traditional media even, does anyone even read that anymore?
00:41:41.360 Or listen to that anymore? I have to say yes in hopes that people are still buying the newspaper.
00:41:46.040 Well, I don't have to say anything because I have a podcast,
00:41:48.600 women of ill repute.com go and sign up. I don't have to say anything that I don't want to say
00:41:54.000 anymore, which is quite liberating. Cause that, you know, at, at CBC and certainly as a political
00:41:59.440 reporter, you weren't supposed to have, uh, a sense of humor or any political opinions about anything.
00:42:05.520 Whereas now you're, it seems, uh, even at CBC or, you know, we've, there are people who'd like
00:42:11.680 tweet stuff about going to, uh, following drag Queens. Well, if I'd done that one, not that that was my
00:42:17.460 thing, but if that had been my thing and I tweeted that, it would have created a huge sensation,
00:42:22.860 which I think, and I think it's good. Like, why shouldn't you be able to tweet whatever the,
00:42:27.800 whatever the heck you want?
00:42:29.020 There you go. Tweeting whatever the heck we want. And that's kind of where, where we found
00:42:35.720 ourselves at. Cause that's the state of social media, maybe the state.
00:42:38.860 Yeah, but we still need to talk to each other and listen to each other and learn from each other
00:42:42.540 and try and understand each other and maybe even forgive each other instead of just saying,
00:42:46.980 Oh, somebody said, they said this, so they're a bad person. And now I hate them. I don't think
00:42:51.640 that's very helpful. Have you been forgiven? Uh, I think a lot of people who actually
00:42:56.840 are familiar with my career and know that I devoted much of it to fighting corruption,
00:43:03.780 uh, fighting for the little guy, um, maybe not doing as well, obviously not doing as much as I
00:43:10.000 should have in terms of like, I remember, uh, I think I just left the Hill and Phil Fontaine started
00:43:15.440 talking about residential schools and I didn't, you know, stop and pay attention. Like I should
00:43:21.960 have paid attention to that. I, I, I said the N word without realizing, uh, that in any context,
00:43:28.340 it could hurt people. And that, did I really want to do that? Um, so, um, so yeah, I think we're,
00:43:35.140 we're all in a, in a, in a different spot now.
00:43:38.820 Wendy Mesley, it's been a great conversation. I admire your career. I admire your honesty.
00:43:42.720 Wendy, thank you very much. Well, thank you. Thank you, Anthony. That's it. Yeah. So women
00:43:46.960 of ill repute me and Maureen, she's a comedian. I'm a journalist, but we're both trying to be
00:43:51.600 honest. And, uh, that's, that's, that's the difference. So it's been lovely to talk to you.
00:43:55.400 Thank you so much. Likewise. All the best, Wendy. Thank you. Yeah. Thank you. Bye.
00:44:00.100 Full Comment is a post-media podcast. I'm Anthony Fury. This episode was produced by Andre Pru with
00:44:06.000 theme music by Bryce Hall. Kevin Libin is the executive producer. You can subscribe to Full
00:44:11.060 Comment on Apple Podcasts, Google, Spotify, and Amazon Music. You can listen through the app or
00:44:16.260 your Alexa enabled devices. You can help us by giving us a rating or a review and by telling
00:44:20.640 your friends about us. Thanks for listening.