Full Comment - November 14, 2022


Why Trump’s ‘new right’ politics are still a force


Episode Stats

Length

43 minutes

Words per Minute

196.21037

Word Count

8,505

Sentence Count

468

Hate Speech Sentences

3


Summary

The U.S. midterms were widely expected to be a red wave, even in some places called a Red Wave, with the Republican Party picking up bigtime seat counts in the Congress and in the Senate. That is not how it played out, however, and many political advisors are now trying to figure out what exactly happened.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Did you lock the front door?
00:00:04.060 Check.
00:00:04.620 Closed the garage door?
00:00:05.780 Yep.
00:00:06.300 Installed window sensors, smoke sensors, and HD cameras with night vision?
00:00:09.780 No.
00:00:10.620 And you set up credit card transaction alerts, a secure VPN for a private connection,
00:00:14.060 and continuous monitoring for our personal info on the dark web?
00:00:17.080 Uh, I'm looking into it?
00:00:19.600 Stress less about security.
00:00:21.360 Choose security solutions from Telus for peace of mind at home and online.
00:00:25.220 Visit telus.com slash total security to learn more.
00:00:28.800 Conditions apply.
00:00:31.000 Wait, I didn't get charged for my donut.
00:00:34.400 It was free with this Tim's Rewards points.
00:00:36.600 I think I just stole it.
00:00:38.000 I'm a donut stealer!
00:00:39.920 Oof.
00:00:40.580 Earn points so fast, it'll seem too good to be true.
00:00:43.600 Plus, join Tim's Rewards today and get enough points for a free donut, drink, or Timbits.
00:00:48.400 With 800 points after registration, activation, and first purchase of a dollar or more,
00:00:51.960 see the Tim's app for details at participating restaurants in Canada for a limited time.
00:00:55.440 Bank more encores when you switch to a Scotiabank banking package.
00:01:05.320 Learn more at scotiabank.com slash banking packages.
00:01:09.140 Conditions apply.
00:01:10.920 Scotiabank.
00:01:11.680 You're richer than you think.
00:01:12.740 Welcome to the latest edition of Full Comment.
00:01:22.520 I'm guest host, Jamil Javani.
00:01:25.260 The U.S. midterms were widely expected to be a red wave, even in some places called a
00:01:31.460 red tsunami, with the Republican Party picking up big-time seat counts in the Congress and
00:01:39.060 in Senate.
00:01:39.840 That is not how it played out, however, and many political advisors, observers, are now
00:01:46.220 trying to figure out what exactly happened with the U.S. midterms and what the takeaways
00:01:51.360 should be as the U.S. political machines start to gear toward 2024 and the coming presidential
00:01:59.020 election.
00:02:00.020 Many questions are left to be asked concerning the influence of former U.S. President Donald
00:02:06.000 Trump, as well as what can be learned from the record amount of money spent in these elections
00:02:12.680 across the United States, a total of $16.7 billion spent in state and federal races, breaking
00:02:21.420 the previous record of $13.7 billion.
00:02:24.820 What are the takeaways from this and what can we expect next in the United States?
00:02:30.020 We are joined by the Managing Director of MAD Global Strategy.
00:02:35.580 He's a Republican strategist and the chief advisor to J.D. Vance's successful Senate campaign
00:02:42.560 in Ohio, Jay Chabria.
00:02:45.400 Jay, welcome to Full Comment.
00:02:47.060 Hi, Jamil.
00:02:47.580 Thanks for having me on.
00:02:48.940 Thanks for joining us, Jay.
00:02:50.340 Now, there's a lot of big questions for us to tackle together here concerning Donald Trump,
00:02:55.540 the Republican Party, the Democrat Party, what the takeaways are from the U.S. midterms.
00:03:00.120 But I want to start with what your life has been like over the last several months, working
00:03:05.380 on what was one of the hottest contested U.S. Senate campaigns in the country, in Ohio.
00:03:13.040 J.D. Vance, who, full disclosure, is a good friend of mine, was successful in winning the
00:03:19.220 Senate seat in Ohio.
00:03:20.320 Many people expected it to be competitive, but he certainly pulled away in the final vote
00:03:26.160 counts, winning by a significant margin.
00:03:29.120 But you've been at this from not just this general election, but also working on the primary
00:03:34.500 earlier this year and late last year as well.
00:03:37.920 What has the last year been like for you?
00:03:39.880 What is it like to work on one of these campaigns that are receiving so much national and international
00:03:45.100 attention?
00:03:45.700 Sure, sure.
00:03:46.820 But before I go into that, when you did your intro and you talked about how many billions
00:03:50.320 were spent in the U.S., I spit out my coffee.
00:03:54.120 I'm just stunned by that number.
00:03:55.800 Boy, it is big business here.
00:03:57.340 And I'm sure we can talk about that later.
00:03:59.680 But going into this last – so it's actually been 19 months since the incumbent senator,
00:04:06.640 Rob Portman, here in Ohio, announced that he was not going to run and J.D. started
00:04:10.940 to think about it, you know, J.D.'s an interesting guy.
00:04:15.980 So I'll say this before we go into what happened last year.
00:04:19.780 He was the first Ohioan to ever be elected to the Senate without ever having run for any
00:04:25.700 office before.
00:04:26.720 So this is not something that actually has ever happened.
00:04:29.840 It's a historic election from that perspective.
00:04:32.280 So that kind of thing actually presents its own challenges and opportunities too.
00:04:36.320 You know, when J.D. first started to decide to do this, we had to build a structure from
00:04:41.560 scratch because of it.
00:04:44.480 When you put a major campaign together, usually you have someone that's run for office before,
00:04:51.020 someone that's got some inroads, and he basically had none of that.
00:04:55.700 So we were able to build something from scratch.
00:04:57.820 And the good thing about that is you can actually build it the right way and you don't have the
00:05:02.580 baggage of, you know, past failures, but there's also a challenge to scalability.
00:05:08.140 And I think because of that, he was a severe underdog, even though folks, you know, in
00:05:13.440 conservative media, folks maybe that are very high information voters knew who he was.
00:05:18.600 The electorate didn't know who he was, and certainly the political establishment was
00:05:22.940 completely against him.
00:05:24.320 So I live here in Columbus, Ohio, which is the capital of the state.
00:05:27.780 And, you know, I'm probably known as a very establishment Republican, and there's a lot
00:05:34.720 of lobbyists and a lot of political operatives that live around me and work around me.
00:05:40.340 And I'm going to tell you, the amount of people that thought that J.D. would be the next
00:05:44.080 senator, I could count on one hand when we first started the process.
00:05:47.880 So that's something you have to overcome, and that took a long time.
00:05:50.880 Um, I'll say, you know, my life, when you talk about me personally, I mean, you know,
00:05:55.780 I like to work hard no matter what.
00:05:57.660 So I don't know that that changed so much, but certainly the focus and what we were trying
00:06:02.420 to do was, was, uh, took up a large part of it.
00:06:06.340 Uh, you know, you have to build a strategy that is unique to J.D.'s, uh, strengths and
00:06:10.840 his weaknesses.
00:06:11.320 You have to build a team that's unique to strengths and weaknesses.
00:06:13.820 And that's what I think we were able to do.
00:06:15.600 And I'll give him a lot of credit for someone that's never done something like this.
00:06:19.400 He learned very quickly.
00:06:20.400 He took advice.
00:06:21.940 He, uh, has great instincts.
00:06:24.180 Um, and we were able to do it.
00:06:25.880 We were able to scale it up.
00:06:26.720 And we had a very contentious primary, as you alluded to.
00:06:28.760 And if you want to talk about that, we can, because that was, uh, a primary where there
00:06:32.580 was probably, uh, north of $90 million spent, um, in it, uh, here in Ohio, which, uh, was
00:06:40.280 absolutely insane.
00:06:41.240 And we came into it, uh, in a general election where we had a Democrat candidate who, uh, was
00:06:49.360 pretending to be a moderate who spent 40 or $50 million and a lot of that against us too.
00:06:55.220 So those are its own challenges too.
00:06:58.640 When you, you know, talk about the amount of money that goes into these American elections,
00:07:03.780 Jay, just for perspective, like, you know, Canadian election laws are very different.
00:07:09.540 And so we're spending a small fraction in a national race as what gets spent in a midterm,
00:07:15.500 um, election in the U S I mean, it's just such a big difference in scale.
00:07:20.540 Can you just speak a bit to that?
00:07:22.340 Like, what is it like doing politics with that much money?
00:07:25.400 What does that money get spent on?
00:07:27.280 How does it affect the decisions that you guys make?
00:07:30.120 Sure.
00:07:30.280 And, and, you know, I've been doing this now for 26 years.
00:07:33.240 Um, and I remember when, uh, so what, what you're talking about is something that I still
00:07:38.920 have to wrap my head around because the money is scaled up so much.
00:07:41.980 I remember when George W.
00:07:44.060 Bush first started running and I was on a campaign that was against him in a primary and, uh, we
00:07:48.180 didn't go very far, but, um, we were, you know, our goal was to raise $8 million for
00:07:52.980 that primary or eight or $9 million.
00:07:55.380 And George W.
00:07:56.420 Bush came in, I think the number was like 18 million and this is a presidential primary.
00:08:00.160 And we were like aghast that he had this much money and it was, it was just a jaw dropping
00:08:05.760 amount, uh, amount.
00:08:06.780 And that wasn't when you look at it that long ago.
00:08:09.800 Um, and now, you know, if it's like 18 million, $20 million in ante for a U S Senate primary
00:08:16.120 in, uh, you know, uh, a fairly large state like Ohio, but it is just amazing.
00:08:20.780 So what does the money get spent on?
00:08:22.140 Look, it's largely paid media.
00:08:25.240 Certainly there are consultants and, uh, there are, there's polling and there's other things
00:08:29.600 that you, but it is almost exclusively all that money goes to put money on TV and obviously
00:08:35.760 digital advertising.
00:08:36.960 That is where the bulk of it is.
00:08:38.980 Um, there are other campaigns that will spend some different proportions in terms of what that
00:08:42.860 is, but that is, that is what drives it.
00:08:44.620 So if we go back to the Ohio race, which again, you know, JD Vance, uh, won as a Republican,
00:08:51.800 uh, by a sizable margin of the vote, uh, declared fairly early on relative to some of the other,
00:08:58.500 you know, hotly contested States, certainly.
00:09:01.380 Um, why do you think you guys were able to win decisively Jay and, you know, the sort of
00:09:07.700 red wave or the red tsunami didn't happen?
00:09:10.180 Was there something unique about the campaign in Ohio?
00:09:12.800 Well, there certainly were unique things.
00:09:15.120 And, um, I think what you're seeing right now are, um, pundits.
00:09:18.880 So, so I've learned a couple of lessons.
00:09:20.020 One is whatever you see on TV or whatever you see by a columnist, uh, it's almost always
00:09:24.940 going to be wrong.
00:09:25.960 They've been wrong on our race.
00:09:27.360 They, they, they're, they're almost uniformly wrong about what happens in the country.
00:09:30.640 Um, and I also think that you, and one of the things I'd love to touch on is, uh,
00:09:34.080 is the state of public polling, uh, in this, in the country.
00:09:36.960 And I think that is just a disaster.
00:09:39.300 Um, but what, one of the things that I'm looking at here, and it's going to take me some time
00:09:43.780 to do a real post-mortem nationally, because as you know, as we're recording this, you know,
00:09:49.380 the house is still undecided.
00:09:50.840 It looks like Republicans will take it.
00:09:52.480 It's the Senate is very much undecided.
00:09:54.720 Uh, Republicans are in a bad spot, but it's still possible that Republicans get the majority.
00:09:58.600 So we don't really know exactly what happened, but certainly they didn't, but Republicans
00:10:02.460 didn't come out of the numbers that we thought they would, or they, or independents didn't
00:10:05.400 vote Republican as they, as we thought they would.
00:10:08.020 Um, here in Ohio, one of the things that I think that's the takeaway is JD ran a primary
00:10:13.900 campaign and he was certainly a populist.
00:10:16.740 He was certainly a Republican and he was very much on these issues that the Republican base
00:10:21.000 cares about very much.
00:10:22.180 And we didn't really change him for the general.
00:10:25.040 Certainly our language may have changed.
00:10:26.980 The order in which we delivered a message might change, but it wasn't like we went and
00:10:32.360 scrubbed his website and changed his positions as other candidates may have done.
00:10:36.920 Um, we wanted to make sure that he was who he was and he talked about the things he cared
00:10:42.420 about because at the end of the day, the candidates got to drive a message.
00:10:44.980 And one of the things I do think that, um, consultants try to do is they don't really respect voters.
00:10:51.660 I think they sometimes don't really, um, believe that they're very smart.
00:10:56.640 And my sense is that voters sniff out, um, people that are inauthentic, people that don't,
00:11:04.700 aren't talking about things that they really believe in and they will push back against
00:11:08.460 something like that.
00:11:09.160 And I think that was a case that that was actually what happened here in the state.
00:11:12.820 Um, our can't, our opponent, uh, really took positions on TV that were counter to his 20 year
00:11:19.200 voting record.
00:11:20.760 And our goal as a campaign was to make sure that we told the truth and shine the light,
00:11:25.420 show a light on, on his actual record.
00:11:27.540 Um, and we really focused on his record the whole time.
00:11:29.660 It wasn't about any of us personal stuff.
00:11:31.340 It was really about his record and the words that he used, um, and, and the, on the multiple
00:11:35.160 positions he took.
00:11:36.400 And, uh, at the same time, we wanted to make sure that JD was as authentic a voice as possible.
00:11:41.240 And I, and I think that was the recipe to, uh, the recipe to our success here.
00:11:45.220 So Jay, as I'm hearing you talk about, you know, how much money goes into these campaigns
00:11:49.600 and how much of it is spent on media, I think a lot of people would assume that having a
00:11:54.460 candidate who's really good on television is key to winning.
00:11:58.900 And certainly I would imagine that's important, but then you look at Dr. Oz in Pennsylvania
00:12:04.040 and, you know, him losing to a guy who clearly did not come across well on television during
00:12:09.260 their debates.
00:12:10.260 And I think it backs up your point that, you know, there is some substance here.
00:12:15.400 Voters are thinking, you know, you do have to respect them.
00:12:18.640 There's gotta be some balance between, you know, good presentation on television, but
00:12:23.580 also making sure people feel like you are being honest.
00:12:26.800 Is that kind of a bit of a, uh, almost like a, a check and balance on the money that you
00:12:32.860 can't really, despite the fact that you can raise a lot of money, you still gotta be able
00:12:36.360 to connect with voters and give them something they're excited about.
00:12:38.900 Well, look, you have to have enough money to, we were outspent in this general election
00:12:43.100 and we won.
00:12:44.440 Now, part of that is the demographics Ohio shifted, but, but, uh, I think a big chunk
00:12:48.200 of it is that we were able to show, uh, voters who JD Vance really was and, and, and really
00:12:53.120 are on the counter case to that for our opponent.
00:12:56.020 Um, so I think what you're saying is correct.
00:12:57.900 Look, JD's excellent TV.
00:12:59.340 He, he's, um, he was great on the debates, but there are candidates all over the place that
00:13:03.600 are really poor in that medium, uh, that get elected.
00:13:06.840 So there are other ways to, to cut, uh, to, you know, to cut that diamond.
00:13:10.580 Um, and, but this was certainly, certainly an advantage in our race.
00:13:14.720 What you're, when you're, what you're talking about in Pennsylvania is absolutely right.
00:13:19.180 Pennsylvania is getting a tough, is a very purple state, but it's leaning Democrat in
00:13:23.320 a lot of ways.
00:13:23.940 Um, you may have had two of the most, uh, flawed candidates in the history of America running
00:13:29.600 in that general election.
00:13:31.540 Um, but Dr. Oz, I don't know that people believe what he was selling.
00:13:35.840 Uh, I haven't delved into the numbers.
00:13:37.640 I haven't really looked into it, but I, I was, it's a neighboring state to Ohio as, as some
00:13:41.860 of your listeners will know.
00:13:42.880 So we share a lot of, uh, cultural issues, especially on the Western side of Pennsylvania.
00:13:47.140 So I kind of have some kind of sense of it and, and it, it does feel like it wasn't a
00:13:51.740 real presentation.
00:13:52.820 And I think that's a challenge.
00:13:54.100 I think you've got to be true to who you got to really believe in what you want.
00:13:57.120 And I know like on the abortion issue here, um, with Dr. Oz, I think he switched the position.
00:14:03.060 And when you switch positions, voters want to know, did you really have a change of heart
00:14:06.540 or is that something you're taking for political reasons?
00:14:08.960 And, um, I, and, and they suss this stuff out there.
00:14:11.660 Again, I really think voters are much smarter and they've got better instincts than people
00:14:15.160 give them credit for the, but the reality is they don't pay attention to this.
00:14:19.340 Like a lot of us do.
00:14:21.560 And so they're going to pay attention to it when they want to.
00:14:24.060 And our job as political professionals is to communicate with them in a way, uh, that
00:14:28.220 we can make sure that they understand what our message is, but also in the right timing
00:14:32.160 that's, uh, that's appropriate for them.
00:14:34.980 Well, I, I would say I'm a bit surprised you made it this long into our conversation.
00:14:38.960 without mentioning Donald Trump, but I think it's probably time to, uh, to, to ask you
00:14:44.240 about him because, you know, you look at the performance of Dr. Oz and I think some people
00:14:49.140 are saying, well, that's evidence of, uh, you know, Trump picking the wrong candidates,
00:14:54.560 backing the wrong people.
00:14:56.200 Trump deserves some of the blame for, you know, uh, Republicans not being as successful
00:15:00.700 in the midterms as many expected.
00:15:03.200 But then you, you know, look at your election where he backed JD and JD did win and JD was successful.
00:15:08.860 So do you think it's fair for people who are saying that this is evidence that Trump is
00:15:14.840 not having a positive influence on the Republican party?
00:15:18.140 So look, I, I, everyone knows, I mean, from, if people know my background, I, I've never been
00:15:22.960 a Trump Republican, but I understand his appeal.
00:15:25.840 I understand what he has done and he has significantly changed, uh, the Republican party and the country
00:15:32.140 in, in many, many ways.
00:15:34.260 Um, and he's really tapped into something, uh, in, in this populist vein, trying to get
00:15:38.420 at, uh, the failure of big institutions, how they've left, um, you know, middle-class and
00:15:43.940 working-class people, uh, behind.
00:15:46.080 So he has done all of those things.
00:15:47.760 One of the observations I'll make, and I, and I think I, I talked about this right at the
00:15:51.600 top of the show is there are a lot of pundits that are, uh, claiming that they understand
00:15:57.740 what happened last Tuesday, they have not one clue and they have a bunch of hot takes.
00:16:03.760 That is something that I am convinced of the, the, the media class, the pundit class here
00:16:08.780 in America and, and, and people go on your shows too, in Canada talking about, I did it
00:16:13.380 the other day at the CBC.
00:16:15.100 Most of them have never been on a race.
00:16:17.140 They are, they really just paid observers and they don't know what they're talking about.
00:16:21.880 Um, I think that Donald Trump did not have a great night in terms of the people that he
00:16:26.000 endorsed.
00:16:26.480 That is certain.
00:16:27.020 JD was the, uh, probably the one bright spot in, in the country.
00:16:30.940 Um, but there's a, there's a bigger thing here and that, and that's the issues that
00:16:35.380 he's identified.
00:16:36.460 Um, if you look at a place like Florida where you have governor Ron DeSantis, who many people
00:16:41.200 say that he's going to be, uh, you know, Donald Trump's big rival for the presidency in this
00:16:45.820 next election.
00:16:46.680 And it's certainly possible, but what did he run on?
00:16:49.940 He really did not run away from the culture wars.
00:16:52.300 He really ran, um, ran on, um, you know, anti-masking.
00:16:56.760 Uh, keeping, uh, keeping the schools open.
00:16:58.440 He ran on transgender issues.
00:17:00.100 He ran on a lot of things that the new right that Donald Trump has ushered in, uh, believes
00:17:05.720 in.
00:17:05.940 And he won a decisive victory.
00:17:08.080 I think it was 19 points, maybe 20 points that he won in Florida, which is a state that
00:17:12.180 is, um, has been considered one of those, um, you know, uh, purple states for a long time.
00:17:18.080 Uh, so there, there are examples like that where people ran into those issues.
00:17:23.640 Um, I, I do think there's one thing to think through though.
00:17:26.300 So Donald Trump, uh, for, uh, for as good as he was identifying the issues, um, a lot of
00:17:31.340 his campaigns were run with, uh, you know, with less than professional manner and they
00:17:37.500 happened to win.
00:17:38.100 Um, but they also, a lot of those people that he, uh, the, the political operatives that
00:17:42.820 came out of that, um, historic victory that he had in 2016 aren't really very good at what
00:17:48.680 they do.
00:17:49.120 And I think the marketplace here in America has been flooded with people that aren't
00:17:52.440 really good at it and haven't had to win tough elections.
00:17:54.920 Um, so I think that might be something that you're seeing in some of these races where they're
00:17:58.640 not as professional races as, um, others might be.
00:18:01.300 Uh, because I do think campaigns matter.
00:18:03.180 I think the team that you put together matters.
00:18:05.240 I think, uh, the messages and the way in which you deliver them to voters matters in elections.
00:18:09.020 Um, and you can't just ride these, uh, these national waves, but it really is unfortunate
00:18:14.380 because Republicans had a big opportunity to have a huge election on Tuesday night.
00:18:19.420 And even if we are able to take the, uh, the house and the Senate, which at least the house,
00:18:24.420 I think we will, but even if we were, we, we take them both, I think clearly we, um, left
00:18:29.460 some offices on the table and that's a shame.
00:18:32.480 You mentioned, uh, governor Ron DeSantis in Florida and immediately what I saw on Twitter
00:18:37.520 and I, of course, Twitter is not real life.
00:18:39.800 I get that, um, was a lot of conservative commentators sort of gravitating to the narrative
00:18:46.820 that the power has shifted and that it is now sort of in favor of Ron DeSantis, that
00:18:53.800 he's got more momentum.
00:18:54.840 He can challenge Trump and perhaps defeat Trump for, uh, the opportunity to run for president
00:19:00.220 in 2024.
00:19:01.620 Do you think that Trump has lost momentum and that Ron DeSantis has picked it up?
00:19:06.060 Where do you think Trump is right now?
00:19:08.340 Yeah, I don't know that it's like that binary thing.
00:19:10.920 So I think, um, there's, there's a couple of things I would look at here.
00:19:14.140 So again, I think Trump had a very mixed night.
00:19:16.140 I think, uh, it was not as good, but I don't, I would not write him off yet.
00:19:19.660 Um, he, if you look at what happened on two, on Tuesday, you're talking about a general
00:19:25.540 elected, a general election electorate, which is a much bigger pool of people.
00:19:30.880 Um, but the folks that will run, that will vote in a Republican primary in these primaries
00:19:36.220 across the country and, and your, uh, listeners will know, you know, first you go to Iowa, then
00:19:40.940 you go to New Hampshire, then you go to South Carolina, then you go to a whole bunch of other
00:19:43.600 states.
00:19:44.360 And those voters are very, um, they're, they're a very different class.
00:19:49.100 Those are people that actually just go to every election and they're very partisan.
00:19:52.860 Um, amongst that group of people around the nation, Donald Trump is still got the gold
00:20:00.000 standard and still the name.
00:20:01.600 Um, and if you're going to go to try to try to defeat him, it's going to take a lot more
00:20:05.860 than just having Trump have a, uh, you know, uh, um, um, subpar night on election night.
00:20:10.640 Uh, because I still think that if you, if you're trying to kill the King, you better go
00:20:15.940 after him and kill him.
00:20:16.720 And I don't think that that has happened yet.
00:20:18.660 Um, I think if Trump decides to run again, I think he will be the prohibitive favorite.
00:20:22.880 Um, and I think it will take a, a very seasoned and, um, uh, a very seasoned campaign to, to
00:20:30.180 be able to overthrow him.
00:20:31.220 We'll be back with more full comment in just a moment.
00:20:34.260 I'm wondering if you could talk to us, Jay, a bit about the internal dynamics within the
00:20:41.180 Republican party.
00:20:42.080 Cause I think to your point, a lot of people in media, a lot of the commentators like to
00:20:46.960 make things very dramatic, you know, that there's like warring parties within the Republican
00:20:51.640 faction.
00:20:53.160 But then you look at some of these things and you see, you know, I was reading in the
00:20:56.660 wall street journal that, uh, Mitch McConnell's Senate leadership fund invested, you know,
00:21:02.260 32 million in the Ohio Senate race.
00:21:05.080 They say that it was 77% of all of the media spending in the Ohio race since mid August.
00:21:12.280 And so what you, what I think we saw in Ohio, and you can correct me if I'm wrong, is both,
00:21:17.900 you know, uh, Mitch McConnell's super PAC and Donald Trump, both backing JD Vance and showing
00:21:24.880 that there is perhaps not, you know, these like clear divisions between different elements
00:21:30.120 of the Republican party.
00:21:31.140 And maybe that might be how, you know, success is actually achieved.
00:21:34.940 What do you say to that?
00:21:36.160 Is it, is there more unity than, than maybe people see from the outside?
00:21:40.380 Well, look, I, there are definitely people when you, when you talk about a two party system,
00:21:44.820 um, and everyone's vying for power, they've, they've also got their own little visions of,
00:21:49.240 of how things should be run.
00:21:50.460 I, I'm not going to paper over it.
00:21:52.480 There is, there are absolutely people that are always jockeying for these different positions,
00:21:56.680 whether it's who is the current leader of the party, who is the, uh, intellectual leader
00:22:01.720 of the party, uh, who are the different leaders of the committees.
00:22:04.960 Um, and so that's always happening.
00:22:07.080 Uh, but you, you point out a very smart thing here in Ohio.
00:22:10.340 We had support from Mitch McConnell and his team.
00:22:12.660 We had support from Donald Trump and his team because he formed a super PAC, uh, uh, full
00:22:17.980 of his old advisors and, and they spent some money on our behalf as well.
00:22:21.440 There was help from a lot of folks because they knew Ohio was an important state and
00:22:25.920 they knew that JD was a candidate that, uh, could carry, it could, could translate a lot
00:22:30.420 of the vision, um, uh, to, to a lot of voters.
00:22:33.360 So I, I do think that there can be times that there's unity.
00:22:36.020 And I think broadly speaking, we want the same things, but, uh, there are certain, there
00:22:40.660 are certain divisions in the party and look, the Democrats have them too.
00:22:44.160 Um, they have them all over the place.
00:22:46.040 So this is just a normal function of politics.
00:22:47.960 And I, I don't, I don't think that there's anything different about this, this period
00:22:51.040 of time that there has been at any other time.
00:22:53.320 Yeah.
00:22:53.360 I do want to ask you about the Democrats as well, but just one last question on this unity
00:22:57.220 thing, because, uh, Ben Shapiro, um, over at the daily wire, he had a, a Twitter thread
00:23:03.920 go viral after the midterms.
00:23:06.020 And one of the things he says is that the Republican leadership class has been paralyzed by the Trump
00:23:12.420 phenomenon and has failed to provide any leadership.
00:23:16.040 And that's how he explained some of the, um, underwhelming results in the midterms.
00:23:21.620 Do you think there's anything to that, that sort of, because of how powerful and influential
00:23:26.640 Trump is, maybe some of the people who are supposed to be articulating a bigger vision
00:23:31.940 of conservative politics for America sort of have their foot off the gas right now.
00:23:37.200 So, you know, the way I interpret that and, and maybe I'm wrong about it, but you know,
00:23:42.540 in 1994, when Republicans, uh, took the house of representatives, uh, for the first time in
00:23:48.740 decades, it, uh, Newt Gingrich was the speaker of the house.
00:23:52.100 And what they did is some of your listeners will remember there was this thing called the
00:23:55.260 contract for America.
00:23:56.320 And there was this platform where Republicans around the country could unite behind a positive
00:24:02.180 agenda of things that they were going to do for the country.
00:24:05.260 That's something that I don't think we've really done as a party for a long time.
00:24:09.400 We were very good at knocking down the big institutions and we're very good about saying
00:24:14.020 that these things have failed us.
00:24:15.380 And what, but, but what are we going to do?
00:24:17.360 How, what is our, uh, our, our policy agenda going to be that people can, you know, like really
00:24:22.500 grab onto and understand, um, and before now there's always danger politically doing that
00:24:27.920 kind of thing, because then once you put something out there, the opponents can spend millions,
00:24:31.840 uh, attacking it and, and saying that, you know, you're not for, uh, voters and you're
00:24:36.980 not for, uh, uh, different types of constituencies.
00:24:40.840 So I, I recognize that, but there are serious positives to having something like that too.
00:24:47.360 It's, it's a vision that people can then get behind and say, boy, you really are for
00:24:51.520 something.
00:24:51.860 And if it's crafted the right way, I think we can do it.
00:24:54.220 And I think that's, I think that's one of those things that I think we should be thinking
00:24:57.260 about for the next election cycle.
00:24:58.600 It will be very difficult when we're in a presidential because whoever is our standard
00:25:02.480 bearer will, will hold the bully pulpit, will, you know, control the media narrative, but
00:25:06.840 certainly for the next midterm election, I think those are opportunities for us to think
00:25:10.140 about.
00:25:11.300 One of the glaring opportunities for growth for Republicans, uh, that seems to stand out now
00:25:18.260 at every election is just making even moderate inroads into black and Hispanic, uh, communities.
00:25:25.720 It was part of the narrative going into the midterms that, you know, because of dissatisfaction
00:25:30.820 with Democrats, Republicans could pick up significant support among black and Hispanic men from the
00:25:37.260 exit poll.
00:25:37.920 So far, it looks like there was a percentage increase with those groups, but not enough to
00:25:43.900 make a much of a difference in outcomes.
00:25:46.240 And I, I looked at that and I thought, you know, I do think there's a difference between
00:25:51.000 people being disaffected by the democratic party and saying, I don't like the Democrats
00:25:56.540 versus people saying I like Republicans.
00:25:59.160 And I think Republicans have maybe, um, underestimated how many people would rather just not vote, um,
00:26:06.020 rather than switch parties.
00:26:07.980 Um, do you think that there's anything that can be learned from the midterms in terms of how
00:26:13.160 Republicans can actually increase their support among black and Hispanic voters?
00:26:18.920 Yeah, that's a very interesting point that you make.
00:26:21.080 And, and, but the one thing I would say is I would caution you on the exit polls, uh, because
00:26:25.440 they are, have been notoriously, you know, all over the place and wrong.
00:26:28.860 And I think we'll have a better sense of this in the days and months to come.
00:26:33.060 But, uh, but certainly if you want to just take that, that slice there too, and I, and I have
00:26:37.180 not seen that evidence yet, uh, because I do know that there were some Republicans that
00:26:41.260 were very bullish on the, uh, but the minority vote coming their way this election, but I'm
00:26:45.840 a little bit less, um, inclined to saying that that's the case.
00:26:50.080 Um, I, I think it's much harder to, especially when you're talking, talking about the African
00:26:54.460 American vote here in the country.
00:26:55.860 I, I, I've been part of campaigns where we've gotten up to, um, you know, 18, 20% of the African
00:27:01.620 American vote.
00:27:02.300 Uh, but it was when we directly engaged them on the issues that they cared about, um, that
00:27:08.540 as a community.
00:27:09.260 And at that point, you're able to break some folks off.
00:27:12.580 Now, crime certainly is a huge issue and it, and it affects black Americans, uh, disproportionately,
00:27:19.320 um, in, in this country.
00:27:21.660 And I think that that is something that Republicans were thinking that would just translate into
00:27:27.700 more votes for them.
00:27:28.780 Um, but I do think that there are more, there's more work to be done where we're actually engaging
00:27:35.500 them in their communities than the evidence that I've seen that we've actually done, uh,
00:27:39.460 in the future, if that's something that we're really interested in doing as a party.
00:27:42.740 Um, I think as, you know, in terms of the Hispanics, so like in Ohio, we've got a very low Hispanic
00:27:48.120 population.
00:27:48.600 So it's not something that, um, I've got a lot of experience in here, uh, in recent times,
00:27:54.500 uh, just in the last couple of election cycles, but, um, nationally, certainly it's a very
00:27:59.480 conservative culture as we know.
00:28:01.440 And once you get further down and there are more generations of Hispanics coming into it,
00:28:06.520 I do think that more of them will become, uh, will be willing to vote Republican.
00:28:10.980 So I think that's a natural thing that's going to happen.
00:28:13.280 But, uh, I think, I, I hope we don't take it for granted just because Democrats fail them.
00:28:18.940 Um, and I think Democrats have failed them in this country, they're not going to necessarily
00:28:23.120 turn to us until, unless we actually have a, um, uh, an agenda that they can say, boy,
00:28:28.480 you're really thinking about what we, what we care about.
00:28:31.040 Yeah.
00:28:31.560 And I think one of the interesting dynamics as, um, you know, the United States heads towards
00:28:37.080 the 2024 election is what happens with Joe Biden, because I think most people probably assumed
00:28:45.520 heading into the midterms that Joe Biden would not be running for president in 2024, but after
00:28:52.580 the results, now it seems to be a much more positive narrative around Joe Biden that perhaps
00:28:57.900 he's necessary in order to be more competitive.
00:29:01.340 I wonder if one, do you agree, uh, that this is, was a good result for Joe Biden?
00:29:06.620 And two, do you think this might create the conditions for a longer period of time to make
00:29:12.340 that pitch to black voters and Hispanic voters?
00:29:16.160 If Joe Biden and the status quo is going to continue, that maybe now there's a, it will
00:29:20.840 be easier to make the sell that if you want something different, if you want some kind
00:29:24.680 of change, you are going to need to consider the Republican option.
00:29:29.100 Yeah, I think those are good points.
00:29:30.580 And I, so I, let's talk about Biden first.
00:29:32.900 I think first of all, yes, of course, this was a good night for him.
00:29:36.140 Um, he's still wildly unpopular, but his party did a lot better than expectations.
00:29:40.620 So there's, there are good things, but there's a very dangerous, uh, a part of this too.
00:29:44.860 Um, this White House and Joe Biden has also said that he's not going to do anything different.
00:29:51.360 Um, if the lessons that they learn from this or that their policies are what America needs,
00:29:58.180 they're going to be wildly mistaken.
00:30:00.960 And they will, in my opinion, lose a reelection, uh, by great margins because these policies
00:30:08.120 have, have, have gotten lots of American suffering.
00:30:11.960 Um, we may have had individual campaigns here.
00:30:14.920 We may have had individual candidates that couldn't speak to it and couldn't take advantage
00:30:18.160 of that this time.
00:30:19.120 But I assure you that the next, um, the nominee from our party will, and, uh, that'll be a
00:30:25.180 very different scenario for Joe Biden.
00:30:27.340 Um, and, uh, let me also say this too, before we talk about, uh, continuing Black Americans,
00:30:32.140 you know, the U.S. Senate map, whether we take the Senate or not this year, when, when
00:30:36.380 all is said and done, it is much more favorable to Republicans.
00:30:39.520 There are going to be a lot more Democrat seats up that, than this map was.
00:30:43.500 So it is highly likely that Republicans take the Senate the next time, uh, next, in two
00:30:48.000 years.
00:30:48.620 So there's, that's also got to be in the backdrop of all this.
00:30:52.280 Um, is there an opportunity for us to communicate with Black Americans and minorities in general?
00:30:57.040 Of course there is, but that's going to largely depend on the next presidential candidate because
00:31:02.880 they're going to be the ones, uh, that campaign is largely going to be the one that has to do
00:31:06.840 this.
00:31:07.560 Um, and there's got to be concerted effort to doing it.
00:31:11.040 Um, and, but short of that, I think it's largely going to be the same kind of percentage, uh,
00:31:16.720 maybe a uptick here and there, but it's not going to be something that is like, uh, decisive
00:31:20.720 in a, in a final election.
00:31:22.980 Yeah.
00:31:23.460 You know, earlier, Jay, you mentioned polling and I do want to spend some time on that because
00:31:27.880 most people listening, uh, to our conversation right now probably have never been asked their
00:31:33.680 opinion by a pollster.
00:31:35.900 And I think a lot of people experience polling just in terms of, you know, as we read newspapers,
00:31:40.440 listen to podcasts as this thing that's being done out there somewhere, but we don't really,
00:31:46.460 most of us aren't part of it.
00:31:47.680 We don't really know what to make of it.
00:31:48.960 We don't know how much to rely on it.
00:31:50.520 You have websites like real clear politics who I think are trying to bring more accountability
00:31:56.240 and structure to polling to make sure there's more integrity to the numbers that people receive.
00:32:02.360 But I wondered from a campaign's perspective, how do you interpret polling, you know, two
00:32:08.160 months ago, one month ago, one week ago, when you guys are deciding how to, you know, use
00:32:12.920 your resources, how to win this election, do, what do polls mean to you?
00:32:17.640 Yeah.
00:32:18.160 So this is, this is an issue that I'm actually super passionate about.
00:32:21.480 I actually wrote a piece for the Daily Caller about this a couple of years ago because public
00:32:24.380 polling, there's two different things.
00:32:25.880 There's public polling and then there's private polling.
00:32:27.260 And I think public polling is an absolute disaster in America.
00:32:31.600 I think it's completely broken.
00:32:33.740 I think the way in which the media looks at polling is dishonest and hurts the American
00:32:39.980 people because they don't really understand it.
00:32:42.500 And they concentrate, concentrate on the horse race of who's up and who's down.
00:32:45.980 And that is not the way I use me who does politics for a living.
00:32:50.480 That's not the way we use polling.
00:32:51.860 I think it's been very difficult to, you know, historically to understand, to get Trump
00:32:58.580 voters to necessarily respond to polls.
00:33:00.820 So that's skewed things.
00:33:02.580 Certainly this time they overestimated Republicans in their polling and we'll figure out why.
00:33:09.200 But at the end of the day, what I do know is these folks don't know what they're doing.
00:33:12.380 Now there's, before I go into, you know, our private polls and how we do it, you know, Monmouth
00:33:16.640 University, which used to conduct this big public poll of who's winning, who's not in the
00:33:21.200 last election cycle, they made a decision.
00:33:22.920 And I really applaud the decision to not do horse race polling anymore.
00:33:26.360 I think that does it, again, I think it does a disservice to people.
00:33:29.580 What they do is they track the moods, the issues that people care about.
00:33:33.780 And so you can kind of get a sense of where things are going, but they're not saying who's
00:33:36.980 up, who's down, because I'm going to tell you, these guys are almost always wrong.
00:33:41.880 And if they're right, they're lucky because they don't know what they're doing anymore.
00:33:46.260 And polling has been broken for about 10, 12 years.
00:33:48.280 Now, in the private side, you know, when we hire a pollster, look, a lot of these guys
00:33:53.000 have been missing the mark, too.
00:33:54.460 I know a lot of Republican pollsters that have not gotten an election right in, you know,
00:33:59.100 in several election cycles.
00:34:01.540 But there are some that are very good.
00:34:03.360 And I happen to think that the pollster that I, that we use, Tony Fabrizio, who is Donald
00:34:06.980 Trump's pollster, too, is one of the best in the business.
00:34:09.240 And he was very accurate with his numbers.
00:34:11.980 But with the way in which we use it is, sure, we get a ballot number.
00:34:15.680 Or we know, OK, your candidate's up or your candidate's down.
00:34:18.600 But that's usually the last thing I look at.
00:34:20.700 Or if it's something I look at, it's not something I pay much attention to for most of the election
00:34:24.140 cycle.
00:34:24.800 What we do is we look at the issues that are most important.
00:34:27.480 We look at the crosstabs.
00:34:28.440 We look at the gettable voters.
00:34:29.960 We look at what messages that they care about, what issues they care about.
00:34:33.680 And we put a strategy in place and a messaging strategy, a grassroots strategy based around
00:34:39.140 those numbers, is how do we move numbers towards us?
00:34:42.560 And we also have these, and beyond polling, we also use data analytics as well, too, to
00:34:48.420 build models of the electorate so that we kind of know where things are.
00:34:51.400 And when you use the combination of those two things, you can put together a very effective
00:34:55.400 campaign.
00:34:56.460 And by the end of it, I felt very comfortable.
00:34:58.740 Look, for my election here in Ohio, I predicted we were going to get 53% or 54%.
00:35:04.220 As we sit here today, I think it's like 53.3%.
00:35:08.200 So I was right along where it was.
00:35:10.640 But that's because the folks that we had do a good job on it.
00:35:13.840 And we built a plan to get to where we needed to go.
00:35:16.900 So there was a heck of a lot of irrational exuberance around the country, in my state,
00:35:23.700 with how Republicans are going to do.
00:35:25.760 And I don't really see why they had those beliefs, but it's largely because these public
00:35:31.500 polls are just terrible at what they do.
00:35:35.040 So I hope that answers the question, because we do use it very differently than the media
00:35:39.220 uses it or the public uses it.
00:35:40.940 I wish the media would educate themselves on this, but I don't hold any hope there, because
00:35:45.360 I think the media is also broken.
00:35:46.560 So someone like Donald Trump would say that these public polls are skewed for a reason,
00:35:54.340 that it's intentionally, I mean, he's basically said it's a type of voter suppression.
00:35:59.300 It's meant to influence whether people think it's possible for Republicans to win, so that
00:36:06.160 people will be discouraged to vote.
00:36:07.860 Do you think there's reason to believe that there's some intention behind this?
00:36:11.540 Or is it just a matter of wanting to get clicks?
00:36:14.020 Like, what's the reason?
00:36:14.880 Yeah, so look, I don't agree with that.
00:36:18.420 I think that they're just incompetent, for the most part.
00:36:23.600 I do think polls get clicks.
00:36:25.340 I think polls get viewership.
00:36:26.560 I know that the media outlets love talking about polls, because people love the horse race.
00:36:30.360 They love this stuff.
00:36:32.120 I think, look, there's certainly some partisan polls that are there to either raise money
00:36:36.820 for their candidates or to suppress votes, whatever.
00:36:39.060 But largely, these university-driven polls, these big news organization polls, I don't think
00:36:42.980 that's what it is.
00:36:43.580 I just think they're really incompetent.
00:36:45.420 They don't know what they're doing.
00:36:46.480 And it's a money grab for them.
00:36:48.160 And I wish they would stop, because I think it's very hurtful to voters.
00:36:53.840 Are you optimistic that the RealClearPolitics accountability effort or some of these other
00:36:59.500 things might actually change polling?
00:37:01.800 No, no, I'm not.
00:37:03.340 I'm not.
00:37:04.200 And look, I look at it, too.
00:37:06.180 Certainly, I do.
00:37:07.560 But I try not to look at the horse race numbers, the ballot numbers.
00:37:10.960 No, the reason I'm not is because, again, as an industry, I think they've lost their way.
00:37:15.060 They don't know what they're doing.
00:37:16.120 And they're selling snake oil at this point.
00:37:17.660 And so I'm very pessimistic on all these other things.
00:37:22.780 I'm not pessimistic on polls.
00:37:25.080 If you're a campaign, I think that there's a lot of value to it, especially if you find
00:37:28.800 a pollster that actually understands how to do it.
00:37:30.800 But I am very, very pessimistic on the public polls out there.
00:37:35.480 So what advice would you have for sort of the average person who doesn't have access
00:37:40.580 to private polls?
00:37:42.020 Should they put any stock into the public polls?
00:37:44.540 Are there certain polling outlets that are more reliable than others?
00:37:49.000 No, I would.
00:37:50.420 So, yeah, there's all these people that give grades.
00:37:52.540 And remember, the grades are based on the last polls before the election.
00:37:55.900 And a lot of times there, it's gamed.
00:38:01.120 I do think that there is some stuff that they gamed to make it look like what they think
00:38:05.560 the election's going to be.
00:38:07.080 But what I'll say, look, if you're an average person and you actually care about this stuff,
00:38:11.500 don't look at the ballot number, especially early in the election cycle, because things
00:38:15.440 can change.
00:38:16.040 Campaigns can be run.
00:38:16.900 Look, my job as a strategist is to change polling numbers, always.
00:38:22.400 Even if we're up by 20, I'm going to try to get to up by 30.
00:38:25.560 If we're down by 20, I'm going to try to win by two or three.
00:38:29.680 So campaigns have to be run.
00:38:32.280 And look, pundits will always look at these polls, especially early in the cycle, and
00:38:35.340 say, oh my goodness, this candidate has no chance to win.
00:38:37.940 And their coverage on it will be skewed.
00:38:40.200 But they have not allowed the campaign to be run.
00:38:43.780 So if you're just someone that is interested in politics and wants to look at this thing,
00:38:49.000 certainly look at polls, but look at them in the cross tabs.
00:38:53.280 Ignore the ballot numbers.
00:38:54.760 Look at where voters are.
00:38:55.960 Look at what issues are driving them.
00:38:57.440 And then as the same outfits continues to poll, look at the trends.
00:39:03.080 If you start to understand those kinds of things, you'll have a better sense of where
00:39:05.760 the electorate is, even if you don't know what the mix is.
00:39:09.960 And look, one thing that's really interesting about polls, people think that they're very
00:39:14.460 scientific.
00:39:15.020 They're not.
00:39:16.520 Certainly there's science behind them, but it's really about the inputs.
00:39:19.720 It's how you determine what questions to ask, how you ask those questions, but also what
00:39:26.220 are the demographics you're going to poll.
00:39:28.720 And those inputs really have a huge influence on what the final output is going to be.
00:39:34.000 So you've got to really look at those things, too.
00:39:37.200 And it's a very hard thing for a regular person to do.
00:39:39.840 I don't doubt it.
00:39:41.680 But still, you're going to get a basic sense of trend lines of where things are and where
00:39:46.540 the country's going.
00:39:47.240 And I think you'll have a better sense of it.
00:39:48.500 But you will not know what the final number is.
00:39:50.240 Well, it sounds like there's a business opportunity there for anyone who can put together a reliable
00:39:56.900 polling methodology.
00:40:00.820 Well, lastly here, Jay, the expectation is that at some point in the coming days, Donald
00:40:07.340 Trump is going to announce his intention to run for president in 2024.
00:40:11.960 I'm just wondering if you can give us your thoughts on what to expect in the next 12,
00:40:16.880 24 months.
00:40:17.620 So what are you what are you seeing?
00:40:19.500 You're not going to get a satisfying answer from me on this one, because if you're asking
00:40:22.740 me to predict what Donald Trump's going to do or what the aftermath is going to be, I
00:40:25.920 am not the person.
00:40:26.980 I don't know that there is a person that can do that.
00:40:29.040 So I'm going to tell you, Jamil, I do.
00:40:31.440 I watch along and I, you know, I pass the popcorn.
00:40:34.580 So what would I say?
00:40:36.380 That's fair.
00:40:37.280 Well, certainly with with the likelihood of Trump coming back, we are not going to be longing
00:40:42.640 for interesting news in the world of American politics.
00:40:46.260 He keeps things he keeps things unpredictable at minimum.
00:40:50.180 So one time I was doing the CBC.
00:40:52.440 I was up there in Canada.
00:40:53.940 I think it was the 2018 elections.
00:40:55.120 And I asked one of the producers, why do you guys care so much about what happens, you
00:40:59.680 know, in the American elections?
00:41:00.520 And the producer said to me, well, we just want to see what happens next season on America.
00:41:05.460 And I've always remembered that is as you guys consume the media that we have down here,
00:41:10.480 because I'm sure it is just something it's like a reality show for for for you guys up
00:41:14.960 there.
00:41:15.400 It's pretty amazing.
00:41:16.520 Yeah, yeah.
00:41:17.580 Well, as long as we don't have to have people suffering negative consequences, which is
00:41:22.180 right.
00:41:22.980 That's the difference between the reality show that is Donald Trump versus the reality show
00:41:27.520 that is Kim Kardashian, actual human lives at stake.
00:41:31.660 Very true.
00:41:33.420 But, but Jay, really appreciate you joining us to talk about the midterms and congratulations
00:41:37.980 again on a successful campaign in Ohio.
00:41:40.820 I think you guys pulled something special off there, as you mentioned, with JD being the
00:41:45.140 first person to be elected to the Senate from Ohio without serving in political office.
00:41:50.680 And, you know, he's a young guy in his late 30s.
00:41:52.680 I mean, there's there's a lot of remarkable things about that story.
00:41:56.000 And, you know, appreciate you sharing with us.
00:41:58.240 There is indeed.
00:41:58.740 He's a remarkable candidate.
00:42:00.280 He's a remarkable candidate and he's got a bright future.
00:42:02.340 So I appreciate it very much, Jamil.
00:42:03.540 Thanks for having me on.
00:42:04.400 Thank you, Jay.
00:42:04.980 Take care.
00:42:05.880 Full Comment is a post media podcast.
00:42:08.620 I'm guest host Jamil Javani.
00:42:10.760 This episode was produced by Andre Pru with theme music by Bryce Hall.
00:42:15.740 Kevin Libin is the executive producer.
00:42:18.420 You can subscribe to Full Comment on Apple Podcasts, Google, Spotify, and Amazon Music, where
00:42:25.080 you can listen through the app or your Alexa enabled devices, and you can help by giving
00:42:29.380 us a rating or leaving a review.
00:42:31.420 And of course, by telling your friends about us.
00:42:55.080 I mean, friend, what's important is to listen to the app.
00:43:01.260 How fast are you from this Unfortunately time?
00:43:03.660 How fast is the app?
00:43:04.440 How fast is the app?
00:43:05.240 How fast is the app?
00:43:07.020 How fast?
00:43:07.980 How fast is the app?
00:43:08.600 How fast is it for you?
00:43:09.780 How fast is it for you?
00:43:10.420 How fast is the app?
00:43:11.360 How fast?
00:43:12.120 How fast is the app?
00:43:13.080 How fast is it?
00:43:13.320 Like fast is it for you?
00:43:14.320 In fact you'll be able to release it.
00:43:14.840 How fast was it?
00:43:15.560 How fast is it for you?
00:43:16.840 How fast is the app?
00:43:17.340 What is your app?
00:43:17.760 How fast is it for you?
00:43:18.520 And you'll see that the app, you'll be able to watch it.
00:43:19.480 sociale name, what are you?
00:43:19.900 What are the runterics?