Full Comment - September 16, 2024


‘Wokeness’ is a mind disease…but it can be beaten


Episode Stats

Length

48 minutes

Words per Minute

155.25142

Word Count

7,487

Sentence Count

441

Misogynist Sentences

22

Hate Speech Sentences

28


Summary

Gad Saad is a visiting professor and Global Ambassador for Northwood University and a best-selling author. His latest book, The Woke Hypocrisy: How to Lead a Woke Life in the 21st Century, was a bestseller in 2018 and has since re-emerged as one of the most popular books of the year. In this episode of the Full Comment Podcast, Dr. Saad joins me to talk about why his new book is so popular and why it s still selling so well.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Did you lock the front door?
00:00:04.060 Check.
00:00:04.620 Closed the garage door?
00:00:05.780 Yep.
00:00:06.300 Installed window sensors, smoke sensors, and HD cameras with night vision?
00:00:09.780 No.
00:00:10.620 And you set up credit card transaction alerts, a secure VPN for a private connection,
00:00:14.060 and continuous monitoring for our personal info on the dark web?
00:00:17.080 Uh, I'm looking into it?
00:00:19.600 Stress less about security.
00:00:21.360 Choose security solutions from Telus for peace of mind at home and online.
00:00:25.220 Visit telus.com slash total security to learn more.
00:00:28.800 Conditions apply.
00:00:31.000 Wait, I didn't get charged for my donut.
00:00:34.400 It was free with this Tim's Rewards points.
00:00:36.600 I think I just stole it.
00:00:38.000 I'm a donut stealer!
00:00:39.920 Oof.
00:00:40.580 Earn points so fast, it'll seem too good to be true.
00:00:43.600 Plus, join Tim's Rewards today and get enough points for a free donut, drink, or Timbits.
00:00:48.400 With 800 points after registration, activation, and first purchase of a dollar or more,
00:00:51.960 see the Tim's app for details at participating restaurants in Canada for a limited time.
00:00:55.440 Bank more encores when you switch to a Scotiabank banking package.
00:01:05.360 Learn more at scotiabank.com slash banking packages.
00:01:09.100 Conditions apply.
00:01:10.920 Scotiabank.
00:01:11.520 If you look around our society today and you think, hmm, things just aren't right, well,
00:01:24.400 you're not alone.
00:01:25.420 Western societies around the world are changing dramatically, and often not for the better.
00:01:29.960 We are becoming less tolerant in the name of tolerance.
00:01:33.220 We are adopting and accepting ideas that actually eat away at the foundations of a Western liberal
00:01:39.760 democracy.
00:01:40.600 Hello, and welcome to the Full Comment Podcast.
00:01:43.000 My name is Brian Lilly, your host, and today our guest is Gad Saad, an academic, an intellectual
00:01:48.360 in the best sense of those words, and someone who many of us have seen document the very
00:01:54.980 issues and concerns that we're going to talk about today on his popular YouTube channel,
00:01:59.660 on Joe Rogan Podcast, and elsewhere, as well as in his best-selling books.
00:02:04.280 Dr. Gad Saad is a visiting professor and global ambassador for Northwood University, and he
00:02:10.300 joins me today.
00:02:11.600 Gad, thanks for the time.
00:02:13.460 Oh, I'm so glad to be with you, Brian.
00:02:15.140 Thanks for having me.
00:02:15.840 I want to open with a quote that I grabbed off the back of your best-selling book and
00:02:22.900 recently became a bestseller again, and we'll talk about that, but I grabbed this off the
00:02:28.540 back dust cover, and I want to read it to you and have you react, and tell me if you
00:02:34.340 still feel the same way.
00:02:36.040 The back of the book, and I don't think this was you writing it, this is the publisher's
00:02:39.760 promotional bit, but it's kind of summarized a lot of what you wrote about in the book.
00:02:44.040 It said, the West's commitment to freedom, reason, and true liberalism has never been
00:02:51.020 more seriously threatened than it is today by the stifling forces of political correctness.
00:02:57.520 Now, that's from a book in 2020.
00:03:00.980 In 2020, you said we had never been under more threat.
00:03:05.120 Yes.
00:03:05.300 Do you still feel that way, or has it gotten worse?
00:03:07.800 Could you have imagined how bad it would be in 2024?
00:03:12.140 I was trying to predict where you were going with this.
00:03:16.160 No, I guess one of the ways I could answer your question is saying that the book is still
00:03:22.720 selling like hotcakes, which suggests that what I hoped would be the final mind vaccine
00:03:31.360 and inoculation against all this nonsense has apparently not sufficiently worked because
00:03:36.740 we are still facing the same issues, if not those issues having been exacerbated.
00:03:42.780 So the book remains timely precisely because the phoenix of woke parasitic ideas keeps rising
00:03:50.700 from the ashes, despite the fact that I keep hitting it.
00:03:53.580 Well, over the summer, as I said, it came out 2020.
00:04:00.960 I think the paperback early 2021.
00:04:05.940 But this summer, you got a big endorsement.
00:04:09.960 And I don't think you'd seen it yet.
00:04:12.040 Elon Musk goes on X and says, you must read this book.
00:04:17.500 And I sent you a message and I said, I just said, how are sales going?
00:04:22.280 And you hadn't seen it.
00:04:24.040 I'm guessing they took off just after that.
00:04:27.280 They did.
00:04:27.780 Now that just to, if I may correct you, it wasn't the first time that he had endorsed
00:04:32.800 my book.
00:04:33.500 He's been a fan of my work and of the parasitic mind for a long time.
00:04:37.560 But that specific post, I shouldn't say tweet, that particular post, you are correct that
00:04:45.300 you were the first one to bring it to my attention.
00:04:48.160 I said, oh, let me go check.
00:04:50.040 And you are indeed correct that there is, I mean, more importantly than the Oprah bump,
00:04:54.980 I think we need to revise our lexicon to the Musk bump because the book then entered two
00:05:01.140 weeks in a row.
00:05:02.840 I think it was the Toronto Star Canadian bestseller list.
00:05:07.360 So you're exactly right.
00:05:08.720 A book that was a bestseller four years ago, returned to the bestsellers list four years
00:05:13.520 later.
00:05:14.720 Well, very well done.
00:05:15.680 Walk us through the parasitic mind because there's been a lot of talk about that.
00:05:21.640 I know that Musk has been a fan of your work and of the book, and he talks about the woke
00:05:26.240 mind virus, and that can sound like it's, you know, sloganeering, it's jingoistic, a parasitic
00:05:35.020 mind.
00:05:35.580 Oh, but what is that?
00:05:36.800 Yeah, no, that's a good question for me.
00:05:39.060 Yeah, that's a great question.
00:05:40.000 So let me give you sort of the background of how I developed the idea and then link it
00:05:44.820 to the neuroparasithological framework.
00:05:47.440 So the first time that I had sort of a Houston, we have a problem moment was in my scientific
00:05:55.580 work.
00:05:56.180 So for those listeners and viewers that are not familiar with my work, I apply evolutionary
00:06:01.200 biology and evolutionary psychology to study consumer behavior, economic decision.
00:06:06.940 And you've written books on this previously.
00:06:09.320 I've written many books.
00:06:10.380 So yes, the consuming instinct right here, the evolutionary basis of consumption.
00:06:14.960 This is an edited book.
00:06:16.720 Go ahead.
00:06:16.900 You've looked at how we react and interact with goods and why we purchase certain brands.
00:06:22.160 And you've looked at that before.
00:06:24.380 That's where you came out of before you got as political as you are now.
00:06:28.780 Right.
00:06:29.120 But I was looking at the biological and Darwinian underpinnings of our consuming instinct, right?
00:06:36.140 So for example, how do our hormones affect our food behavior?
00:06:39.760 How do our hormones, you know, does a man's testosterone increase if he is using a, you
00:06:47.600 know, driving a Porsche?
00:06:48.740 I've literally done those studies.
00:06:50.560 How does a woman's menstrual?
00:06:52.440 It does.
00:06:53.140 As a matter of fact, so I did a study with one of my former graduate students and I'll
00:06:57.440 come back to the parasitic mind in a second.
00:06:59.960 In 2009, I published a paper with John Vungas, who was one of my former graduate students,
00:07:05.340 where we actually got men to not imagine driving a Porsche.
00:07:12.720 We actually rented, try to get a scientific granting agency to give you money to rent a
00:07:18.900 Porsche for science.
00:07:20.300 So we rented a Porsche and we had a beaten up old car.
00:07:24.140 So one is a high status product.
00:07:25.760 One is a low status product.
00:07:27.120 And we had young men drive these two cars, either in downtown Montreal, where everybody
00:07:34.880 can see you and on a semi-deserted highway where few people could see you.
00:07:40.000 And the dependent measure was we took salivary assays so that we could measure the fluctuation,
00:07:47.020 the fluctuating levels of their testosterone.
00:07:50.120 Because, and actually that's a good segue to eventually answering your parasitic mind
00:07:54.340 question.
00:07:55.000 So one of the things that I do as an evolutionary psychologist is I look at the behavior of other
00:08:00.640 animals to draw homologies and analogies with human behavior.
00:08:04.960 So for example, the peacock, right, has evolved this big, beautiful tail that's otherwise very
00:08:10.740 cumbersome and costly, right?
00:08:12.880 It's from a survival perspective, that peacock's tail is costly.
00:08:16.700 It increases your chances of predation.
00:08:18.760 But the reason why it evolves, it does so through sexual selection, meaning that it confers a reproductive
00:08:24.860 advantage to the peacock in exhibiting that signal.
00:08:28.200 So I took that idea and I said, well, surely human beings engage in sexual signaling and
00:08:34.000 I'm going to study it in the context of consumer behavior.
00:08:37.180 And that's how I came up with the idea of studying it and using, so the Porsche is the human equivalent
00:08:43.680 of the peacock's tail.
00:08:45.460 So coming back now to the parasitic mind.
00:08:48.180 So I realized early in my career that what seemed profoundly obvious to me, which is that
00:08:54.600 human beings are biological beings, and therefore if we want to study consumer behavior perfectly
00:09:00.240 and completely, we need to study the biological forces that compel us to be the consumers that
00:09:05.940 we are.
00:09:06.520 Well, that was complete crazy quackery.
00:09:09.040 It was neo-Nazism, according to many of my social scientist colleagues and business school
00:09:14.840 professor colleagues.
00:09:16.020 And so right there, I said, well, this is strange.
00:09:18.840 How could otherwise supposedly sophisticated, intelligent, intellectual professors be such
00:09:25.200 imbeciles?
00:09:26.800 So that was my first exposure to how ideology can cause you to have completely irrational
00:09:34.360 thoughts.
00:09:34.740 So that was nearly 30 years ago.
00:09:36.460 And then as my academic career progressed, I saw the infiltration, the proliferation of
00:09:44.480 these, what I call parasitic idea pathogens.
00:09:47.740 But why do I use the framework?
00:09:49.380 To your very specific question, why do I use the framework of parasitology?
00:09:54.600 So in the animal kingdom, including humans, there is the field of parasitology, which studies
00:10:00.420 how parasites interact with hoats.
00:10:02.760 So for example, the tapeworm goes into your intestinal tract, but a neuroparasite ends up
00:10:15.120 in your brain, altering your circuitry to suit its reproductive interest.
00:10:21.300 And therefore, I had my aha moment.
00:10:23.640 I would then argue in the parasitic mind that not only can human beings be parasitized by actual
00:10:30.020 physical brain worms, like Toxoplasma Gandhi, but they could be parasitized by ideological
00:10:36.720 brain worms, and hence my neuroparasithological framework.
00:10:41.040 And what are some examples of these parasitic ideas?
00:10:44.860 Post-modernism, cultural relativism, social constructivism, radical feminism.
00:10:50.900 Each of these parasitic ideas destroy the capacity of the infected person to think rationally.
00:10:58.580 And so I go through all of these parasitic ideas, and then I offer a mind vaccine at the
00:11:04.000 end of the book.
00:11:05.420 You know, as I'm thinking about, you know, cultural relativism, I was just trying to look
00:11:10.140 up her name.
00:11:10.880 The Iranian dissident who lives in New York, she's had her life threatened.
00:11:15.840 I'm sure you've seen her work.
00:11:17.120 It just reminds escaping me now.
00:11:18.740 And she's talked about that recently, about how we've got people in the Western world declaring
00:11:25.900 themselves feminists, but they won't speak up for the women of Iran who are being oppressed.
00:11:31.680 They are fully on board with Hamas and Gaza and denouncing Israel, which is a state that
00:11:40.200 actually puts these things forward.
00:11:42.280 So I said off the top, we have become less tolerant in the name of tolerance.
00:11:48.520 Is that one of the parasitic ideas that you deal with?
00:11:51.920 Oh, absolutely.
00:11:52.680 Look, so cultural relativism was an idea that was first espoused by an anthropologist by the
00:12:01.960 name of Franz Boas.
00:12:03.440 And he wanted to create a new worldview of human behavior that abdicated biology as being
00:12:14.960 relevant to the study of human behavior.
00:12:17.300 In other words, because a whole bunch of bad folks had misused Darwinian theory.
00:12:24.640 So for example, British class elitists argued that, well, it's a natural struggle between
00:12:31.360 the classes.
00:12:32.040 We're the upper class.
00:12:33.620 If the lower class has to die from a pandemic of tuberculosis, and if they live in squalor
00:12:42.240 and they all die out, well, that's just Darwinian.
00:12:45.280 It's just the natural struggle between classes.
00:12:48.180 The Nazis came along and said, hey, it's a natural struggle between the races.
00:12:52.260 We are the Aryans.
00:12:53.980 Sorry, gypsies.
00:12:55.060 Sorry, homosexuals.
00:12:56.040 Sorry, Jews.
00:12:56.840 It's time for you to go.
00:12:58.700 Hey, that's just Darwinian.
00:12:59.940 Now, of course, it had nothing to do with Darwinian theory, but because all sorts of political
00:13:05.200 cretins were misappropriating evolutionary theory, some idiotic professors, as often
00:13:12.460 happens the case, said, hey, why don't we create a new worldview of humanity that completely
00:13:18.460 abdicates biology and evolutionary theory being relevant to human beings?
00:13:23.100 Therefore, cultural relativism does exactly that because it says that there is no universal
00:13:30.200 human nature.
00:13:31.680 There are no universal objective moral truths.
00:13:36.000 Every culture has to be judged based on the idiosyncrasies of its own cultural trajectory.
00:13:43.740 Therefore, who are you, Brian, white guy, Canadian imperialist racist, to tell us that the cutting
00:13:52.400 off of clitorises of five-year-old girls is a bad idea?
00:13:57.420 That's cultural imperialism.
00:13:59.480 And that's, by the way, exactly what, since this is a Canadian show, so let's link it to
00:14:03.500 Justin Trudeau.
00:14:04.440 If you remember when Justin Trudeau was a parliamentarian, before he became prime minister, Stephen Harper's
00:14:11.080 government had released a sort of an edict or a pamphlet saying, look, we do not condone
00:14:18.440 barbaric practices like female genital mutilation, child brides, honor killings in Canada.
00:14:26.660 And if you remember, in a very theatrical and obnoxious, bombastic way, Justin Trudeau got
00:14:31.700 on TV and kind of huffed and puffed and moved his hair and said, you know, I will not tolerate
00:14:37.220 that these things be called barbaric.
00:14:39.540 Barbaric.
00:14:40.380 Yeah, he was upset at the use of barbaric, not the barbaric practices.
00:14:45.600 Exactly.
00:14:46.480 Well, what allowed him to have the goal to do that is precisely cultural relativism.
00:14:52.840 Who are you to judge what others do?
00:14:54.680 No, no, no.
00:14:55.300 I will judge.
00:14:56.440 There is no context under which cutting off the clitorises of little girls so that they
00:15:01.440 could never experience fully the joys of intimacy is ever a good thing.
00:15:05.880 So each of those parasitic ideas, Brian, started off in a university setting for a noble cause,
00:15:15.440 right?
00:15:15.880 So in a sense, I'm being charitable here.
00:15:18.800 It's not as though the people who espouse and spawn these ideas say, let's just destroy
00:15:24.140 the edifices of reason just for fun.
00:15:26.380 They usually start off with a noble reflex, but then in the service of that noble reflex,
00:15:33.260 if we have to murder and rape truth, so be it.
00:15:36.520 I remember a colleague going back years ago, I was in radio in Ottawa, and he made a comment
00:15:48.040 that there was objective truth, and there were a pile of other people in the newsroom that
00:15:53.920 couldn't believe that he said that, and they said, no, there is no truth.
00:15:58.020 There's only your truth and my truth.
00:16:00.000 Well, no, but there has to be a truth, and we can have our views, we can have our opinions,
00:16:05.760 but beyond cultural relativism, there is a desire to say there is no truth anymore.
00:16:12.300 Right.
00:16:13.000 That's a beautiful setup for my next anecdote.
00:16:17.580 Maybe some of the viewers and listeners have heard it, but even if they have, it's worth
00:16:21.080 hearing it again.
00:16:21.940 And for those who have never heard it, fasten your seatbelts.
00:16:25.060 So the reason why I call postmodernism the granddaddy of all idea pathogens is precisely
00:16:33.520 because that's the root parasitic ideas from which all of the other parasitic ideas can
00:16:40.380 flourish.
00:16:41.180 If we can espouse the idea that there are absolutely no objective truths, then you're not constrained
00:16:48.740 by your genitalia when it comes to your biological sex.
00:16:51.680 Who are you to say what constitutes male or female?
00:16:54.260 As the most recent addition to the Supreme Court, when she was being confirmed and asked,
00:17:00.360 what is a woman?
00:17:01.540 She said, well, I'm not a biologist.
00:17:02.980 Well, until 15 minutes ago, until 15 minutes ago, the 117 billion people that had existed
00:17:09.980 on earth were perfectly able to navigate through the very complex conundrum of what constitutes
00:17:16.260 male or female, but she wasn't able to say it.
00:17:18.740 Did you see the head of the International Olympic Committee?
00:17:23.540 Yes.
00:17:24.640 He was at a news conference.
00:17:27.560 And of course, there was all the debate about the women's boxing and were there biological
00:17:33.780 males in it?
00:17:35.020 Was it, you know, they did not handle it well.
00:17:38.300 They could have settled all the debate by being upfront and honest.
00:17:42.580 So one of the journalists just asked a very relevant question, will you handle this better
00:17:51.040 next time?
00:17:52.580 Will you find ways of talking to the public and being upfront with them so that there isn't
00:17:59.480 this controversy around sex?
00:18:02.920 And he said, there is no scientific way to determine what is a man and what is a woman.
00:18:10.360 This is the head of one of our biggest global bodies.
00:18:14.600 Well, I was fortunate enough when I chose what I thought was a woman to start my family.
00:18:21.320 And then we ended up having children.
00:18:22.960 It's by the complete vagaries of stochastic life that I ended up, because I could have
00:18:30.080 easily chosen a woman with a nine-inch penis to have children with, but luckily I came out
00:18:35.860 on the right side.
00:18:36.840 But just so that I don't leave your viewers and listeners hanging, can I go back to telling
00:18:42.160 the story?
00:18:42.520 Yeah, go back to your story.
00:18:43.400 So the best way to describe what a cancerous form of intellectual terrorism, postmodernism
00:18:53.000 is, to your point about your colleagues who were saying, what is this?
00:18:56.240 There is no objective truth.
00:18:57.680 In 2002, one of my doctoral students had just defended his dissertation.
00:19:04.620 So we were going out to celebrate.
00:19:07.720 And have you heard this story before?
00:19:10.160 Okay, so I'm glad because it's always exciting when someone hears it for the first time.
00:19:16.600 So we were going out for a celebratory dinner, myself, my wife, my doctoral student, and he
00:19:22.960 was bringing a date with him.
00:19:24.880 So a few hours before the date, before the dinner, he calls me up and he says, oh, I just
00:19:31.660 wanted to give you a heads up that the lady that I'm bringing for the dinner is a graduate
00:19:36.400 student in anthropology, postmodernism, and women's studies.
00:19:43.520 And I said, ah, okay, so the holy trinity of bullshit.
00:19:47.320 And so, but of course, the reason why he was calling me to say this is like, you know, please,
00:19:52.560 can we not get into this big, you know, I said, oh, no, no, I got you.
00:19:56.860 I'm going to be on my best behavior.
00:19:59.280 Mom's the word.
00:19:59.880 I'm going to be good, which of course was a complete and utter lie because about halfway
00:20:05.560 through the evening, I turned to the lady and I say, oh, I, I hear that, you know, you're,
00:20:11.880 you're a graduate student in postmodernism.
00:20:15.060 Yes.
00:20:16.280 Oh, so there are no objective truths, of course, other than the one objective truth that there
00:20:22.160 are no objective truths.
00:20:23.120 But nevermind that internal cognitive inconsistency.
00:20:27.240 Do you mind if I propose what I think are universal truths and then we can discuss it and
00:20:33.800 you can tell me how I'm, I'm wrong.
00:20:35.580 She says, yes, go for it.
00:20:37.120 Now this is 2002.
00:20:38.320 So this is way before the transgender stuff.
00:20:40.580 2000, this is 22 years ago.
00:20:42.100 I said, is it not true that within homo sapiens humans, that only women bear children?
00:20:50.720 She looks at me, can't believe at what a simpleton I am and says, that's absolutely not true.
00:20:56.500 I said, oh, what, what do you mean?
00:20:58.100 How is that?
00:20:58.960 How is that?
00:20:59.860 She goes, oh, because there is some Japanese tribe on some Japanese Island whereby within
00:21:06.680 their folkloric mythological realm, it is the men who bear the children.
00:21:12.020 So by you restricting the conversation to the biological realm, that's how you keep us,
00:21:16.380 you know, whatever, barefoot and pregnant.
00:21:18.060 So after I recovered from the mini stroke I had at listening to such gibberish, I then
00:21:23.240 said, okay, well, you know what?
00:21:24.520 Maybe it was too controversial, too incendiary for me to mention something as controversial
00:21:30.620 as only women bear children.
00:21:32.140 So let me give you another example and then let's see if we can agree on this one.
00:21:35.620 She goes, yeah, go for it.
00:21:36.900 I said, is it not true since time immemorial that sailors have relied on the premise that
00:21:43.000 the sun rises in the east and sets in the west?
00:21:47.600 And there she used a variant, Brian, of postmodernism.
00:21:52.160 It's called deconstructionism.
00:21:53.900 It's Jacques Derrida.
00:21:55.220 Language creates reality.
00:21:57.280 So she said, what do you mean by east and west?
00:22:00.680 And what do you mean by the sun?
00:22:02.720 That which you call the sun, I might call dancing hyena.
00:22:06.800 Exact words.
00:22:07.800 I said, well, fine.
00:22:08.580 The dancing hyena rises in the east and sets in the west.
00:22:11.920 She goes, I don't play those label games.
00:22:13.880 Now that became known.
00:22:15.100 It's not part of the lore of the internet, the dancing hyena story.
00:22:19.180 Why do I always recount that story is because it perfectly captures what happens to a graduate
00:22:28.220 student at a leading, arguably the leading Canadian university who is parasitized by postmodernism.
00:22:37.260 If she can't sit at a dinner and agree on the fact that women bear children and that there
00:22:43.040 is such a thing as east and west and the sun.
00:22:46.180 And the sun.
00:22:47.360 What can we do?
00:22:48.300 Like, where can we go from there?
00:22:50.100 It's a Darwinian epistemological dead end.
00:22:53.640 There is no value to postmodernism, right?
00:22:56.620 So that gives you a sense of why I wrote The Parasitic Mind, because yes, universities can
00:23:03.220 be wonderful places, but they can also be where reason goes to die.
00:23:08.780 But okay.
00:23:09.440 So these ideas start in the university.
00:23:12.620 Yes, sir.
00:23:13.360 They don't stay there.
00:23:14.440 It's not like a, you know, a bad weekend in Vegas.
00:23:17.280 It doesn't stay in Vegas.
00:23:19.240 It comes back with you like a venereal disease from Vegas, and it infects everybody.
00:23:25.840 This, talk about how that has an impact on the wider society, because Western liberal
00:23:32.800 democracies, I think, were going pretty well.
00:23:37.320 You know, we had elevated society, and now we seem to be going backwards.
00:23:43.680 And so how do these ideas that infect the minds of just academics at the start undermine
00:23:52.600 our entire society?
00:23:55.240 I love that you set up the question that way, because one of the most frequent blowback that
00:24:02.720 I would receive early in my career as I was standing on top of the mountain warning people
00:24:08.700 is, oh, come on, Dr. Saad, why are you exaggerating?
00:24:12.500 So there is some esoteric department in the humanities that is promulgating these ideas.
00:24:18.840 So what?
00:24:19.660 It's not going to make it to medicine.
00:24:21.720 It's not going to make it to mathematics.
00:24:23.960 It's not going to make it to the business school.
00:24:26.160 I said, no, exactly to your point.
00:24:27.960 I said, the virus eventually breaks free from the lab, as we think we know with the lab leak
00:24:35.900 theory of COVID.
00:24:37.000 So yes, you're right that the dreadful parasitic idea starts off in some nonsensical department
00:24:43.840 in the humanities, but it doesn't stay there.
00:24:47.780 You know what it becomes eventually?
00:24:49.300 It becomes the prime minister of Canada, right?
00:24:52.160 So you're exactly right.
00:24:54.480 Bad ideas don't have a geographical limitation.
00:24:59.740 That's what makes them so dangerous.
00:25:00.880 That's why I repeatedly say in my social media engagement, and earlier you mentioned Elon Musk,
00:25:06.440 he completely agrees with me.
00:25:07.580 We've had private conversations where we've confirmed this to each other, where there is
00:25:12.540 nothing more dangerous on earth than a parasitized mind.
00:25:17.940 Yes, a tsunami can cause great devastation, but that's a, quote, act of God.
00:25:23.140 But most of the tragedies that are imparted throughout human history start off with a bad
00:25:31.720 idea, right?
00:25:32.480 There is a little Austrian guy with a small mustache who said, hey, you know what the
00:25:36.560 big problem in our culture is?
00:25:39.700 It's the cancerous parasitic Jew.
00:25:41.760 And if we only excise that from our society, then we will all live in a utopia.
00:25:46.800 And a bunch of people said, yeah, that sounds like a great idea, Adolf.
00:25:49.640 So, to your point, that's why I stood up and kept screaming and screaming, because I knew
00:25:58.300 that those ideas were going to eventually escape and become our journalists, our pop culture,
00:26:04.200 our actors, our prime ministers.
00:26:06.680 And so, yeah, that's what happens when bad ideas infect entire societies.
00:26:12.400 All right.
00:26:13.080 We need to take a quick break here.
00:26:14.840 When we come back, I want to talk about how it's impacting medicine, because if you haven't
00:26:21.000 been following it, the idea that we're going to put diversity, equity, and inclusion ahead
00:26:27.740 of medical knowledge is actually something happening.
00:26:30.880 More in moments.
00:26:32.340 Gad, before we jump back into the conversation about parasitic ideas and how they don't just
00:26:38.700 stay in the sociology department somewhere, you've got a new title.
00:26:41.980 You're visiting professor and global ambassador at Northwoods University.
00:26:48.420 I don't know Northwoods University.
00:26:50.760 Give me your elevator sales pitch on this.
00:26:53.680 What are you doing there?
00:26:54.640 Tell me about this change.
00:26:56.400 Yeah.
00:26:56.740 So, I was approached by the president of Northwoods University there.
00:27:01.680 And apparently, having yet gone in person, I will be going soon in person to meet the
00:27:06.800 folks there in Midland, Michigan.
00:27:10.600 He approached me and said, look, we're big fans of your scientific work and, of course,
00:27:15.460 your free thinking.
00:27:16.860 We are known as the free enterprise university.
00:27:20.380 So, their entire ethos is rooted in freedom.
00:27:24.900 And we would love to see if we can work together.
00:27:28.840 And so, in all frankness, I had never heard of Northwood either.
00:27:33.760 But boy, am I glad that I now have because, you know, it's really, we're all human beings.
00:27:40.180 And so, we'd like to say that, you know, hey, nothing phases me and so on.
00:27:44.960 But you also want to be at a place that shares your general sense of how a university should
00:27:53.380 be run that is not infested with parasitic ideas.
00:27:57.240 And so, it's been very, very refreshing for me in the few weeks that since I've joined
00:28:02.260 them to be able to interact with people, you know, who I don't have to discuss whether
00:28:08.740 the sun exists or not, or whether it's called dancing hyena or not, or I don't have to do
00:28:14.020 land acknowledgements before saying hello.
00:28:16.140 And I don't have to submit a diversity, inclusion, and equity statement before I apply for a grant.
00:28:21.520 So, it's been very, very liberating.
00:28:23.920 And I really look forward to my visiting professorship there.
00:28:28.000 Well, let me know how Midland, Michigan is.
00:28:31.480 Beautiful part of the, I haven't stopped in Midland, but I love that the area of that part
00:28:37.060 of the state that it's in.
00:28:38.200 So, I'm sure you'll enjoy it.
00:28:39.860 And go in the fall because, you know, campus is in the fall.
00:28:42.960 There's just something picturesque about it.
00:28:45.740 That's exactly what the president told me, by the way.
00:28:47.640 He said, we want to get you here before winter breaks, precisely for the reasons that you
00:28:52.080 said.
00:28:53.520 So, we were talking about parasitic ideas.
00:28:56.960 We were talking about how they don't just stay in the sociology department.
00:29:02.780 And I want to give you one glaring example.
00:29:06.420 And then, you know, we can move from there into what happened to Jordan Peterson and the
00:29:12.100 College of Psychologists a little while ago.
00:29:14.060 But this is actually from one of the organizations that determines how doctors are trained in
00:29:23.680 this country.
00:29:24.140 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada put out a notice a little while ago
00:29:29.840 that they want to change how medicine is taught and practiced.
00:29:33.640 And it said, quote, a new model of can meds would seek to center values such as anti-oppression,
00:29:41.960 anti-racism, and social justice rather than medical expertise.
00:29:47.360 I don't give a flying you-know-what about my doctor's political views.
00:29:52.920 I want to know, are they competent?
00:29:55.480 My GP, I happen to be friends with, and we share political views.
00:29:58.960 But I really don't care when I'm being treated medically, how they view, you know, the state
00:30:05.460 of Canadian politics or what have you.
00:30:07.620 I want to know, are they competent?
00:30:08.840 And these guys want to put everything else ahead of competence.
00:30:12.380 Yeah, I've actually weighed in on that exact new training of Canadian physicians.
00:30:17.960 Look, there are certain professions and certain bodies, the FBI, judicial system, the medical
00:30:28.720 associations that should transcend politics, right?
00:30:32.900 I mean, that's like the Hippocratic oath should be first do no harm.
00:30:38.820 Now, of course, the woke physicians will say, but no, we are doing no harm by teaching you
00:30:44.100 about anti-oppression.
00:30:45.280 No nonsense, right?
00:30:46.940 If anti-oppression comes before your ability as a physician to perform an operation, you're
00:30:55.680 doing harm.
00:30:56.920 You're exactly right, all right?
00:30:58.620 So look, I mean, that issue arises not only in, you know, at that, you know, with physicians,
00:31:06.920 it starts at the first point where, for example, they're now arguing that the grading of physicians
00:31:15.140 when they're in medical school creates undue pressures and stress on physicians, and therefore,
00:31:23.520 we should move to a more empathetic pass-fail system so that people are not competing against
00:31:31.020 each other and worried.
00:31:32.560 Guess what?
00:31:33.140 But I want my emergency room physician who, by definition, is facing some of the most stressful
00:31:40.060 moments where the decision tree that he or she follows over the next five minutes will
00:31:46.780 cause that child to either die or not.
00:31:49.380 I want them to have been exposed to stressors, right?
00:31:53.380 Seneca, in the happiness book, I talk about anti-fragility, which is a term that was coined
00:31:59.380 by a fellow Lebanese, Nassim Talib, right?
00:32:02.120 Seneca, the ancient philosopher, Stoic, said, I'm paraphrasing, that the strongest trees are
00:32:10.560 those that have been exposed to a lot of wind stressor.
00:32:14.880 Therefore, their bark and their roots are stronger.
00:32:18.400 The trees that haven't been exposed to wind stressors end up being brittle and they break
00:32:23.120 and they, right?
00:32:24.240 So let's apply that, the concept of the wind stressor to your physician.
00:32:29.120 Do you not want them to have faced stressors so that they can be trained to deal with stress?
00:32:34.920 So not only are you infusing to your original question all of this woke nonsense in the practice
00:32:42.060 of medicine, but just in the original training of physicians, you're incorporating this very
00:32:48.200 loving, I love you, you love me, we all win trophies.
00:32:52.280 No, we don't.
00:32:53.300 I want the physician to have suffered during medical school because that makes them anti-fragile.
00:33:02.300 At the medical school level, here's just a couple of things.
00:33:05.680 This is from my colleague, Jamie Sarkanak at National Post.
00:33:12.060 She writes about the University of Calgary created a special admissions pathway for black
00:33:16.340 students, entitling applicants to have their admission essays evaluated by non-white assessors.
00:33:22.700 McGill, the University of Alberta and Dalhousie have all done the same and similar routes are
00:33:29.060 being opened up for indigenous students.
00:33:31.100 I'm all for having diversity in terms of who's getting into medical school, but it is an insult
00:33:39.160 to indigenous and black students to say, well, you should be held to a lower standard.
00:33:46.080 Indeed.
00:33:46.700 I mean, it's simply, isn't it, do you wake up in the morning, Brian, and say, I simply, I
00:33:52.220 mean, I wrote the parasitic mind and I don't cease to be amazed every day at the level of
00:33:59.140 collective lunacy that we are seeing.
00:34:01.780 It's really breathtaking, right?
00:34:02.960 Because you'd like to think that there are certain ideas that were defeated.
00:34:07.340 Let's say judging people based on immutable traits.
00:34:11.180 We call that racism.
00:34:12.820 We call that bigotry.
00:34:13.940 And we did a great job over the past 100 years to remove those systematic barriers, right?
00:34:20.380 And of course, that speaks to, I know you know this, but maybe some of your listeners
00:34:24.980 and viewers don't, the distinction between equality of opportunities and equality of outcomes,
00:34:29.900 which of course, the current contender for the presidency of the United States, Kamala
00:34:34.100 Harris, doesn't seem to understand that difference, right?
00:34:36.440 She believes that to the extent that there is any differences across people in terms of the
00:34:43.580 outcomes, it must be a nefarious cause that created that difference.
00:34:50.800 And therefore, we need to fix that so that we all end up at the same final place.
00:34:55.680 I mean, those are literally almost identical words.
00:34:58.580 You know what creates equality of outcomes?
00:35:01.140 Socialism and communism, right?
00:35:03.380 But we all end up poorer and more oppressed.
00:35:05.480 We all end up poorer.
00:35:06.400 We all end up at the same bread line.
00:35:09.140 We all end up as hungry as each other.
00:35:12.060 We all end up dying of famine together, equally dead from the famine, as Lysenkoism showed
00:35:18.720 during the Soviet Union era, right?
00:35:21.340 Because the argument there is, there are fewer women who are professors of mathematics at Brown
00:35:28.780 University.
00:35:30.060 Aha!
00:35:30.800 That's where the part that the patriarchy is demonstrating its machinations.
00:35:35.500 But it never goes the other way.
00:35:37.440 When I was a kid, there were a lot more men as teachers.
00:35:45.020 Elementary schools are 85% to 90% women as teachers.
00:35:50.260 You always found more men in high school teaching positions, but even that is shrinking.
00:35:55.300 There were fewer men in nursing.
00:35:57.640 Nobody says we've got to get more men into these professions.
00:36:00.520 Yeah, well, not only that, Brian, once the patterns of the narrative of oppression is no
00:36:09.880 longer present, people don't adjust their priors.
00:36:13.760 So let me explain that.
00:36:14.680 That sounded like a lot of fancy talk.
00:36:16.160 So let me break it down into a concrete example.
00:36:19.100 There used to be a time where women were discriminated from entering veterinarian school
00:36:25.460 and from entering medical school and entering...
00:36:28.300 When my mother came here in 1968, she had been working on computers in the UK.
00:36:33.280 She got to Canada and was told, oh, no, ladies can't do that job.
00:36:36.940 I'm not, you know, I'll never say there was not discrimination and oppression and things
00:36:41.280 to change, but we've got a weird view of it.
00:36:44.260 So now let's fast forward to today.
00:36:46.500 So I would receive at my university endless emails.
00:36:49.780 You know, how are you going to be an ally to women?
00:36:53.460 What's your contribution to allyship to women?
00:36:55.920 As if the email was happening while we all lived in Waziristan and the tribal territories
00:37:02.560 of Pakistan.
00:37:03.460 Now, let me draw the line of what the current data shows.
00:37:08.920 So this is from US data, US government data, looking at four levels of educational attainment.
00:37:16.500 So in the US, you have what's called an associate's degree, which is like half a bachelor's.
00:37:21.300 Imagine like community college.
00:37:23.080 So there's associate's degree, bachelor's degree, master's degree, and doctoral degree.
00:37:28.500 So there are four levels of educational attainment across five racial groups, whatever, Hispanic,
00:37:35.680 white, black, and whatever.
00:37:37.420 So there are five.
00:37:38.300 So the matrix is a four by five matrix, okay?
00:37:42.080 In each of those cells, the government has provided the ratio of male to female, right?
00:37:51.980 So let's assume we were the time when your mother came, or let's go further back to make,
00:37:57.920 to go back to when there was real full on orgiastic discrimination.
00:38:03.060 20 out of the 20 cells would have shown that men outnumber women in each of the 20 cells.
00:38:08.840 Guess what the current data was?
00:38:12.020 Go give it to me, Brian.
00:38:13.380 Oh, it's all women.
00:38:14.920 20 out of 20 cells, women outnumber men.
00:38:19.760 So let me, I get, I'm not trying to talk down to your audience, but it's important to explain.
00:38:25.400 Meaning that I couldn't make up data that was more of a falsification of the narrative
00:38:34.940 that women are being held back in universities.
00:38:38.080 Therefore, it offends me as a professor of 30 years to receive an email of,
00:38:44.920 how are you going to be a better ally to women?
00:38:47.940 My dean is a woman.
00:38:49.240 This is at my home university.
00:38:51.240 My chair is a woman.
00:38:52.520 The associate dean of research is a woman.
00:38:54.720 But yet I'm being sent emails as if I lived in Waziristan, Pakistan.
00:38:59.540 That's the dishonesty of the woke narrative,
00:39:02.600 which is it is impervious to incoming new data that the victimhood narrative must persist.
00:39:09.940 La, la, la.
00:39:10.840 I don't want to hear of any progress.
00:39:12.460 What's the anecdote?
00:39:15.000 Is there an anecdote?
00:39:16.120 I mean, I know you've got anecdotes in your, or antidotes, sorry.
00:39:22.020 I'm saying anecdotes.
00:39:23.100 What's the antidote?
00:39:24.220 I'll learn to speak one day.
00:39:25.960 English is my second language, I guess, after Glaswegian.
00:39:29.960 The, you know, how do we cure this?
00:39:32.420 You put the book out four years ago.
00:39:34.500 It hasn't worked, Gad.
00:39:35.780 Well, I'd like to say, I mean, it has worked in the sense that I receive, I mean, literally receive
00:39:45.940 thousands of emails from people saying, I was the biggest blue haired wokester possible.
00:39:54.200 Then I read your book.
00:39:56.020 I started consuming your content.
00:39:58.340 Thank you so much.
00:39:59.160 So, so in the grand scheme of things, I haven't been able to administer the vaccine and all
00:40:05.800 stupidity has ceased to exist.
00:40:07.380 And I don't think any mind vaccine could ever do that because regrettably, I think the architecture
00:40:13.180 of the human mind is built to be parasitized.
00:40:16.660 The only thing that's unique about the current period are the specific idea pathogens that we
00:40:23.120 are now seeing, right?
00:40:24.400 Cultural relativism was not an idea pathogen 500 years ago.
00:40:28.820 But there were other idea pathogens then, right?
00:40:31.860 You look, look back to the 1930s.
00:40:34.560 They thought eugenics was great.
00:40:37.000 Even Tommy Douglas did his, his thesis on, you know, sainted Tommy Douglas did his thesis
00:40:42.860 on eugenics in favor of it.
00:40:46.320 Exactly.
00:40:46.800 So yeah, bad ideas have been around a long time.
00:40:48.720 So bad ideas are around.
00:40:50.960 Regrettably, there's always an allure to these bad ideas so that they can quickly infect and
00:40:57.360 parasitize many human minds.
00:40:58.900 There was a time where we threw women into the water and if they swam, they were witches.
00:41:04.960 And if they didn't and drowned, then oops, I guess they weren't witches.
00:41:08.520 And people thought that that was a great test to do.
00:41:11.740 That was a diagnostic test to determine whether my neighbor, Angela, was a witch or not, right?
00:41:17.260 So we've, we've done that to Dr. Jordan Peterson.
00:41:21.740 We have, by the way, in the water, he swam.
00:41:24.940 So we must be a witch and he's got to go to a re-education camp.
00:41:28.260 Have you seen the clip, the satirical clip that I released where I feigned that the Ontario
00:41:35.200 College of Psychologists has had declared me as his re-education mentor?
00:41:40.900 Have you seen that clip?
00:41:41.720 I mean, that, that's now, I think my second or third most viewed clip of all of my clips.
00:41:48.140 So this demonstrates to you, by the way, the power of satire, sarcasm and humor, right?
00:41:54.380 Because the dictators don't usually eliminate the guys with the big muscles because we can
00:42:02.580 handle those because we own all the guns.
00:42:04.440 I'm speaking out if I were the dictator, the guys that really are dangerous to me as a dictator
00:42:09.540 are the guys with the sharp tongues, the guys with the sharp pen.
00:42:13.580 Those are the bastards that I have to eliminate.
00:42:16.260 So the satirist is the biggest danger to the dictator.
00:42:19.920 We have, he, he goes first to the chopping blocks.
00:42:22.400 So oftentimes I will get some smarmy, obnoxious professor that I'm talking to who tells me,
00:42:28.080 oh, but you know, aren't you demeaning your professorial, you know, image when you do all
00:42:35.040 of that satirical stuff?
00:42:36.460 I say, absolutely not, because I'm in the game of trying to persuade people to better
00:42:42.520 think.
00:42:43.160 I will use any weaponry within my arsenal of weapons to try to achieve that goal.
00:42:48.260 Sometimes I will be professorial.
00:42:50.260 Sometimes I will be scientific.
00:42:52.280 Sometimes I will be satirical.
00:42:54.680 All bets are off when it comes to trying to change human minds.
00:42:58.900 Well, you know, we're seeing in the United Kingdom what we're worried about here.
00:43:03.940 And this is something that Elon Musk is fighting back against.
00:43:07.320 He has definitely turned Twitter now X around in terms of being a place for free speech.
00:43:15.420 We just had Mark Zuckerberg admit that, yeah, he had downplayed the Hunter Biden laptop story
00:43:20.360 and he was smothering true things that were being said about COVID at the behest of the
00:43:26.800 government, the Biden administration, because it went against their, their views.
00:43:30.960 But in the UK, we're seeing people being arrested for memes posted on Facebook.
00:43:37.040 I'm worried about that coming here.
00:43:38.740 If we don't have a change in government, that sort of thing, you know, if you had told
00:43:44.920 me 20 years ago in Britain, they'll be arresting you for jokes, I would have laughed.
00:43:49.820 I mean, the cradle of the, the, the best of Western civilization comes from the UK, the,
00:43:57.380 the, the Americans, Canada, the Australians, New Zealand, we all draw inspiration from there.
00:44:03.080 And they are now once great Britain.
00:44:06.720 Yeah.
00:44:06.900 I mean, life comes at you fast to your point about how quickly things change.
00:44:10.740 I have a quote in the parasitic mind.
00:44:12.740 I don't have it in front of me.
00:44:13.600 So I don't, I'm going to sort of paraphrase it.
00:44:15.260 Ronald Reagan famously said, and I'm sure you probably know which passage I'm talking
00:44:19.340 about, where he basically said, look, every generation, there has to be an assiduous fight
00:44:24.900 for freedom and freedom of speech, because the bad folks are always coming to bring down
00:44:30.600 those, those majestic, you know, foundational values that define the greatness of the West.
00:44:37.060 And so in the past, we had a stronger sense of our identity so that we were able to push
00:44:43.580 back against intrusions against freedom, but because of all this cocktail of parasitic
00:44:48.120 ideas, there's no longer any defense against it.
00:44:51.120 So that a place, as you said, a cradle, the bastion of the Western tradition, Britain is
00:44:56.420 now looking more like Orwell's worst nightmare.
00:45:00.020 And if I may, I don't think I've ever mentioned this to, in our, I didn't mention this in our
00:45:05.220 last conversation.
00:45:07.140 There is a distinction in ethics between deontological ethics and consequentialist ethics.
00:45:12.840 And I'll link it back to, you know, the 11-year-old that's being arrested in Britain.
00:45:17.880 So bear with me.
00:45:20.220 Deontological ethics refers to absolute statements of ethical conduct.
00:45:25.760 So for example, if I say, it is never okay to lie, that would be a deontological statement.
00:45:32.060 Consequentialism, on the other hand, is another ethical statement that says that you judge the
00:45:36.260 morality of an action based on its consequences.
00:45:38.900 So then if you say, it's okay to lie if you're trying to spare someone's feelings.
00:45:43.760 And so I often joke that if you want to have a long, happy marriage, if you ever hear the
00:45:47.940 following question, do I look fat in those jeans, put on the, put on your consequentialist
00:45:53.260 hat very quickly.
00:45:54.340 Okay.
00:45:54.740 Now, for many, many things in life, we are all consequentialists and that's perfectly fine.
00:46:00.380 But, so now I'm going to tie it back to your original question.
00:46:03.600 When it comes to foundational values that define the Western tradition, those by definition
00:46:10.540 have to be deontological.
00:46:12.420 If you say something like, I believe in freedom of speech, but the second you say, but you're
00:46:19.080 a degenerate asshole, because what's going to come after the but is going to be exactly
00:46:24.000 some consequentialist ethos.
00:46:26.040 Yes, you should be able to criticize religions, but you should maintain group cohesion or community
00:46:32.980 cohesion.
00:46:33.620 That's what causes people to then argue that Islamophobia should be a hate crime.
00:46:38.100 No, no, no.
00:46:38.460 In a free society, as long as it's not defamation, libelous, you know, incitement for child pornography,
00:46:46.180 direct incitement for violence, screaming fire in a theater, there are, all bets are off.
00:46:52.760 I am Jewish with a very, very tragic childhood in Lebanon, and yet I support the right, Brian,
00:46:59.480 of Holocaust deniers to spew the most offensive and insulting stuff humanly possible, which
00:47:05.920 is the rejection of a historically documented reality where an entire people were extinguished.
00:47:14.000 I support their right to exhibit such offensive language.
00:47:19.060 So that's the problem of what's happening now in Britain.
00:47:22.540 They've put on a consequentialist hat when it should be the deontological framework that
00:47:29.380 originally made Britain great.
00:47:32.200 Well, you and I will continue to be out there on the good fight pushing back against bad ideas.
00:47:38.100 We could talk for another hour, but I know you've got another appearance to make.
00:47:41.560 So, Gad, thanks so much for your time.
00:47:43.840 Keep up the good fight, and let's keep in contact.
00:47:46.920 That's wonderful.
00:47:47.440 Thank you so much for having me, Brian.
00:47:49.120 All right.
00:47:49.600 Full comment is a post-media podcast.
00:47:52.300 My name's Brian Lilly, your host.
00:47:53.940 This episode was produced by Andre Pru.
00:47:56.180 Theme music by Bryce Hall.
00:47:57.980 Kevin Libin is the executive producer.
00:48:00.200 Remember to hit the subscribe button, whether you're listening on Apple Podcasts, Spotify,
00:48:04.640 YouTube Podcast, now a thing.
00:48:06.920 Make sure you leave us a review, share it on social media, tell your friends about us.
00:48:11.220 Thanks for listening.
00:48:12.040 Until next time, I'm Brian Lilly.