00:04:33.320I know the whole focus has been on me, but we want to reel everything back and put the focus on the three angels that's at hand.0.98
00:04:41.000What a good Christian man who only was doing what he thought was the right thing to do based on the evidence before him.
00:04:49.940And the gag order verbatim, the DA says Reddington is engaged in substantial publicity pre-trial, during trial and post-trial that has inevitably tainted any further venue.0.86
00:05:06.220You say it's up to Tim, but what would you like?
00:19:33.860The case has not resulted in a final conviction.
00:19:36.500The legally careful formulation is that the, quote, woman accused of killing her children, end quote, or if convicted, and the distinction matters.
00:20:44.280he redirected the tension to the three children who can't speak for themselves the children who
00:20:51.500cannot testify who cannot hire an attorney who cannot go on television who cannot explain their
00:20:56.700side of the story and why their mom might have done this the lone juror reminded the public of
00:21:02.700the most important fact in this entire case that three children are dead and the public reaction
00:21:09.060has become increasingly divided some commentators have attacked the juror others have defended him
00:21:13.520Some have turned the case into a broader argument about women, mental illness, marriage, and criminal responsibility, and why, by God, why did the husband leave the wife so soon?
00:21:22.140Because all of his kids were dead, that's why, and she killed them.
00:21:26.420Some commentators have argued the juror was unfairly targeted by other jurors or by the media.
00:21:31.960Watch the original clip and decide for yourself what was actually said.
00:21:35.660We should not repeat fair paraphrases as direct quotes.
00:21:38.920another commentator raised a racial comparison involving the mental illness defense again
00:21:45.460we're showing the original words rather than relying on a paraphrase the comparison may be
00:21:49.940part of the public debate but it does not should not displace the central facts of this case
00:21:55.440lindsey clancy killed her kids the mental illness is an explanation of it it's not the excuse and
00:22:03.360that is the difference or post demanding the repeal of the 19th amendment those
00:22:07.420comments generate attention to my comments have generated attention
00:22:10.660when we need to make sure that we advance justice even with our comments they turn three dead kids
00:22:18.020into fuel for a culture war and maybe this is a culture war worth having because if you kill your0.98
00:22:23.200children you should be killed too and there's a there's a disturbing double standard in the way0.99
00:22:28.540the public has treated patrick clancy if a mother lost her children to a man accused of killing them1.00
00:22:32.920would a television host ask why she didn't stay married to him
00:22:36.400would anyone suggest suggest that she owed him her husband lifelong loyalty no they would not
00:22:43.500would anyone criticize the wife for rebuilding her life of course not
00:22:47.640forgiveness is not the same as reconciliation and mental illness is real grief is real
00:22:54.560accountability is real the right to heal is real and the right to heal is patrick clancy's right
00:23:01.780He doesn't owe the public a lifetime chain to the person accused of destroying his family and killing his kids.
00:23:07.620Men are not setting women back by demanding equal accountability, I argue.
00:23:10.820It's the women that are holding women back now because of the Lindsay Clancy trial and the nine woke liberal white women jurors.1.00
00:23:20.700Double standards are getting in the way of progress for women by God, and these feminists are on the wrong side of history.0.90
00:23:27.900There are two separate questions here.
00:23:29.680the legal question is whether the prosecution can prove its case in the environment that we're in
00:23:33.860now it is a circus and how the court should evaluate mental illness intent and responsibility
00:23:38.800the moral question is whether the children will be remembered or whether they will disappear
00:23:44.460behind a public campaign centered on the accused which I believe has already happened the legal
00:23:49.980system must follow the evidence the public should avoid declaring a defendant guilty before a lawful
00:23:54.540verdict yes however she killed her kids but avoiding a premature legal conclusion does not
00:24:00.740mean avoiding moral clarity it does not mean pretending the children are a footnote it does
00:24:05.040not mean attacking the fathers for trying to heal it does not mean threatening a juror
00:24:09.580for following his conscience the man the juror michael
00:24:12.620is in hiding it doesn't mean allowing the loudest voices in the case to drown out
00:24:21.000others, or drown out the kids who can no longer speak.
00:24:28.240The defense is entitled to defend its client.
00:24:30.740The prosecution is entitled to prosecute its case.
00:24:34.120A defense attorney can argue mental illness without erasing the children.
00:24:37.280A politician can demand accountability without deciding the verdict.
00:24:40.300A juror can disagree with the majority without becoming a villain.
00:24:43.800And a grieving father can forgive without remaining trapped in his marriage.