Greg Wycliffe - Bill C-63 - How Trudeau Plans to Censor Our Internet

00:00:00.040 If I was a power-hungry politician and I wanted to control everything that was said on the internet

00:00:06.480 and I wanted to create powers so I could silence and censor anybody I wanted,

00:00:11.960 how would I possibly convince the public in a free Western society?

00:00:17.220 How would I convince them to say that's a good idea?

00:00:20.740 I'm a Canadian, my name is Greg, and in this video I'm going to show you exactly how the Trudeau regime

00:00:24.960 is going to try and pull this off in Canada.

00:00:28.220 Everyone is talking about Bill C-10 right now, the internet censorship that's coming to Canada.

00:00:35.260 Hopefully it will be resisted, we need to stop Bill C-10,

00:00:38.200 but what not many people are talking about is the upcoming bill that I believe is being tabled this week.

00:00:44.860 Right now it is Monday, May 3rd, early in the morning, that's when I'm making this video,

00:00:50.480 and I want to show you the research that I've done on this upcoming bill,

00:00:54.320 what I predict it's going to be, how it's going to be sold to Canadians,

00:01:00.100 and also just the disgusting things that Guilbeau and the Trudeau Liberals are trying to do

00:01:06.280 to try and sell it to Canadians.

00:01:08.780 And finally, make sure you tune in until the end,

00:01:11.640 because I'll show you who's actually building the legislature for this upcoming bill,

00:01:16.720 and just how flagrantly biased they are. 0.97

00:01:19.440 It's absolutely disgusting.

00:01:22.160 But we have a lot to get through, so let me hop into it.

00:01:24.800 And first of all, let's just remove all doubt about the real true intentions of this bill.

00:01:30.560 This bill is thinly veiled authoritarianism.

00:01:33.580 They want to install an RCMP of the internet, essentially.

00:01:38.420 So they have the power to police speech online,

00:01:42.100 they will have the power to eventually fine you and possibly jail you,

00:01:45.960 if you say the wrong thing.

00:01:47.100 Let's go to this interview here with our pal, Mr. Guilbeau.

00:01:53.260 Let's hear him talking about describing the bill.

00:01:55.740 He's describing this newest hate speech bill.

00:01:58.540 I'm not sure what they're going to call it,

00:02:00.000 but it's the authoritarian bill, essentially.

00:02:01.980 It's the authoritarian censorship bill.

00:02:03.440 This is him describing the, this is our goal with this new legislature.

00:02:09.120 And third, there's the work our government has been doing over the past few years

00:02:14.460 to combat online harms.

00:02:16.740 We are now...

00:02:17.960 What is online harms?

00:02:20.720 What is online harms?

00:02:22.820 The number one reason why we know this is authoritarianism

00:02:27.060 is no one has answered that question.

00:02:30.240 What is an online harm?

00:02:33.000 Okay, let's start with our favorite.

00:02:37.560 Is this an online harm?

00:02:39.920 Is showing this image of Trudeau and blackface an online harm?

00:02:44.700 Who is it harmful to?

00:02:45.800 It's certainly harmful to his reputation.

00:02:48.400 It might be harmful for black people or indigenous people or Saudi Arabians.

00:02:53.880 Um, is, I mean, are we going to erase part of our heritage?

00:03:00.220 You know, is, is, could this be harmful if blackface is brought up in the wrong context?

00:03:05.740 Is that harmful?

00:03:06.780 How about this?

00:03:08.620 Wife beating guidance by Qatari official, Dr. Ahmed Al-Farjabi on Al Jazeera TV.

00:03:15.400 Some woman must be subdued by muscles. 1.00

00:03:18.720 Women almost unanimously agree that beating is better than letting the wives ruin their families. 1.00

00:03:23.940 Wow, what a hot take.

00:03:25.900 Now, this is a hard one.

00:03:27.400 This is a hard one.

00:03:28.400 How, how, is, is this harmful content?

00:03:31.440 And by the way, I mean, are we going to censor Dr. Ahmed Al-Farjabi?

00:03:37.320 Wouldn't silencing a Sharia expert, wouldn't that be Islamophobic to silence somebody like this?

00:03:46.220 But at the same time, you know, this is sounding kind of sexist, what he's saying.

00:03:50.740 So, is this harmful content?

00:03:52.760 How do we regulate this?

00:03:54.940 Here's a Mad TV skit from 2001.

00:03:59.840 Nice call.

00:04:00.640 Here we go.

00:04:02.100 All right.

00:04:02.780 How you doing?

00:04:03.260 Robert Meiger.

00:04:03.960 Good luck to you.

00:04:04.760 Darren Kragger.

00:04:05.600 Thanks a lot.

00:04:06.360 All right.

00:04:07.200 It's the Miggers versus the Crackers. 1.00

00:04:09.520 What is it?

00:04:10.000 Louie, listen, it's Miger, not Migger, bro. 1.00

00:04:15.320 Hey, cut me a break, bro. 1.00

00:04:16.920 I haven't seen my penis in eight years, all right? 0.99

00:04:18.940 Is that harmful content? 0.99

00:04:23.560 And furthermore, if you go into the comments, someone said, am I the only black person who

00:04:29.400 found this funny?

00:04:30.180 I hope not, because this is hilarious.

00:04:32.000 That was over a thousand likes, that comment.

00:04:34.800 So, is that comment harmful?

00:04:38.540 Is this sketch harmful?

00:04:40.280 Harmful to who?

00:04:41.180 How are we going to regulate, are we going to delete old Mad TV sketches off the internet

00:04:45.420 if we're in Canada?

00:04:46.300 There's no end to this question of what is harmful content.

00:04:53.120 And the number one reason why we know this legislature is thinly veiled authoritarianism

00:04:59.500 is because they can't answer this question of defining what the harmful content is.

00:05:05.060 However, this is what Mr. Gilbo goes on to say.

00:05:09.360 Developing legislation to deal with online harms to address hate speech,

00:05:14.180 child sexual exploitation content, terrorism content, content that incites violence,

00:05:20.680 and a non-consensual sharing of intimate images online.

00:05:24.920 All five of those things he listed are already illegal.

00:05:30.640 Hate speech is already illegal.

00:05:32.680 Child is already illegal.

00:05:36.360 Terrorism content, inciting violence, and non-consensual sharing of images.

00:05:41.480 This is all already illegal.

00:05:44.480 It's already illegal already.

00:05:48.660 This is the second reason why we know this is thinly veiled authoritarianism.

00:05:52.860 Because the things that they're saying that we're going to stop are already illegal.

00:05:56.840 So, what is the purpose of this new legislature?

00:06:00.340 They're saying we're going to stop more of it.

00:06:02.420 We're going to stop more of it.

00:06:03.560 And people are saying, 0.92

00:06:06.400 Oh, Greg, like you're crazy.

00:06:08.300 What, we're going to get thrown in jail and fined and all this? 0.99

00:06:10.820 Like, that's crazy.

00:06:11.780 Well, there's a reason.

00:06:12.760 This is why I'm saying it's thinly veiled authoritarianism.

00:06:16.240 There's a reason this new legislature is getting grouped in with these things.

00:06:21.260 Terrorism and things that are already illegal.

00:06:22.940 They're going to expand the definition.

00:06:24.900 This is my prediction.

00:06:26.000 They're going to expand the definition of hate speech.

00:06:27.960 They're going to expand this wide blanket of harmful content.

00:06:32.040 And then basically, if you have the wrong political opinion, actually, you're a terrorist. 0.64

00:06:38.100 Actually, you know, you're as bad as somebody who distributes child. 0.97

00:06:46.080 That's where this is going. 0.96

00:06:47.300 This is what I'm predicting.

00:06:48.280 And of course, you have to look out, guys.

00:06:49.960 They're going to dress it up with all this pretty language, all this pretty stuff.

00:06:53.800 And you should not believe it.

00:06:55.560 You should not believe a word they're saying.

00:06:57.960 It's clearly thinly veiled authoritarianism.

00:07:01.120 Like I said, they do not define harmful content.

00:07:04.760 No one can answer this question of what is harmful, what is not harmful.

00:07:08.960 How are we going to regulate the content?

00:07:11.180 So it's just a big, fat excuse to censor and silence who they want.

00:07:17.340 It's thinly veiled authoritarianism.

00:07:19.080 So don't fall for it.

00:07:20.160 We've seen too many examples of public officials retreating from public service due to the hateful

00:07:26.260 online content targeted towards themselves or even their families.

00:07:30.720 This is another clear tell that this is about authoritarianism because they're mentioning

00:07:37.580 specifically, oh, oh, no, public officials.

00:07:43.040 These are public officials and their families.

00:07:46.100 They feel so unsafe.

00:07:47.460 And of course, we have to bring this up.

00:07:49.240 I don't know.

00:07:49.600 You may have heard about this in the summer.

00:07:51.120 Police launch hate crime investigation after a man yells obscenities at Catherine McKenna

00:07:58.860 at her office.

00:08:00.180 When I walk downtown Toronto, I'll have homeless drunk people yelling obscenities at me.

00:08:06.180 OK, this is a public official.

00:08:08.400 Of course, people are going to be yelling at her.

00:08:10.380 But no, it's a hate crime to yell at a public official now.

00:08:14.980 And by the way, if you've seen the clip of this man, yeah, he does say the C word.

00:08:19.660 It's a little classless.

00:08:21.340 I will say that.

00:08:22.620 But he does have his stats and his facts with him.

00:08:24.940 And it's like, Miss McKenna, you've misplaced, like, what was it, tens, 20,000 different

00:08:32.020 infrastructure projects of, like, taxpayer money.

00:08:35.340 Like, she did mess up and someone's getting angry and now it's a hate crime.

00:08:41.200 And you can imagine if they apply the same logic of a hate crime of some Canadian getting

00:08:46.740 angry at a public official, you can just imagine how they would apply that online.

00:08:50.880 Oh, you're complaining about Justin Trudeau and our safety minister, Bill Blair, lowering

00:08:59.280 the sentences for people who smuggle illegal guns into Canada?

00:09:04.620 Oh, you're complaining about that?

00:09:06.560 Of course, I'm complaining about that.

00:09:08.080 Of course, that makes me angry because at the same time, they're taking away guns from

00:09:12.620 legal gun owners.

00:09:14.220 You know, it's right here.

00:09:16.700 It's right here in front of us.

00:09:18.200 Why would he mention that?

00:09:20.860 Oh, public officials feel unsafe.

00:09:23.540 And by the way, this is, the next thing he's going to say here is the most disgusting part

00:09:29.040 of what they're trying to do here.

00:09:32.200 My original question is, if I was a power hungry politician trying to control everything on the

00:09:38.460 internet, how the heck, how the heck would I sell this to people?

00:09:41.920 How the hell would I convince them of it? 0.99

00:09:44.040 And the answer is, using black people and indigenous people and marginalized groups as pawns. 1.00

00:09:50.820 It's not a new tactic by the Liberal Party, but boy, is it their favorite.

00:09:55.500 Listen to this.

00:09:56.420 Based on a national survey from the Canadian Race Relations Foundation, we know that the

00:10:01.340 vast majority of Canadians are worried about hate speech online and that the government

00:10:05.940 should be doing more to prevent hateful behavior online.

00:10:09.380 So, notice how he stuck those two points together.

00:10:14.380 He stuck the one point of, oh, Canadian public officials feel really safe online.

00:10:20.040 By the way, we did this Canadian racism poll and we found that people really don't like

00:10:25.660 racism and really don't like hate speech online.

00:10:28.500 You see how they just kind of snipped those two kind of points together? 0.94

00:10:31.860 It's disgusting.

00:10:32.540 And this right here is the Canadian Race Relations Foundation Facebook page and it's really disgusting 0.90

00:10:37.880 what they're doing because they're kind of creating like victim porn where they're glorifying

00:10:43.400 victims of really crappy situations.

00:10:46.980 Making me feel like I was a smash hit.

00:10:49.860 You know, and this person's recounting a scenario where someone like throws a cigarette butt at

00:10:54.720 them or something and it's horrible.

00:10:57.320 That's obviously horrible.

00:10:58.180 It's not a good excuse to now police all speech and content online and protect government

00:11:04.740 officials.

00:11:05.880 It's not a good excuse for that.

00:11:07.220 But the Liberal Party is doing this.

00:11:08.920 They're taking these people's sad stories and saying, okay, now we get to protect ourselves

00:11:13.780 from any criticism online.

00:11:15.360 This is the play.

00:11:16.660 This is the play.

00:11:18.200 I think they want to install the RCMP of the internet so they can silence and censor who

00:11:24.760 they want.

00:11:25.260 Sorry to break it to you folks, but this is the play.

00:11:28.020 This is what they're going for.

00:11:29.440 They don't really care about this poor woman and her experience.

00:11:33.060 They care about glorifying it.

00:11:35.120 They care about fetishizing it and capturing it and using those tears, using those sweet

00:11:41.580 tears so we can get our authoritarian internet. 0.78

00:11:44.640 It's gross. 0.96

00:11:45.880 It's gross.

00:11:46.480 And this is not the only video like this at all.

00:11:50.900 And, you know, I don't like to victimize myself.

00:11:54.840 I don't think it's a good for anybody. 0.99

00:11:56.600 I think that you're going to deal with assholes in life. 0.99

00:11:59.880 Okay. 0.99

00:12:00.140 I ran for the People's Party in 2019.

00:12:03.700 I had people turning their back on me.

00:12:06.280 I had volunteers yelled at in the street, like 18-year-old volunteer, like physically

00:12:11.100 intimidated by a guy twice his size.

00:12:13.300 I had someone of Indian descent volunteering for me.

00:12:17.220 He had stuff thrown at him.

00:12:18.820 Okay.

00:12:19.480 Why?

00:12:20.120 Because he was associated with the People's Party of Canada.

00:12:22.840 You know, like I didn't make some long video about him crying when he got stuff thrown

00:12:28.640 at him. 0.98

00:12:29.100 It was horrible and it's disturbing and it's totally fucked up, especially when you consider 0.99

00:12:33.200 a lot of the misinformation about the People's Party of Canada was spread by our mainstream 0.99

00:12:38.520 news.

00:12:39.180 Shout out to Warren Kinsella, by the way, that spineless slug guy.

00:12:45.180 Oh, don't get me started on him.

00:12:46.940 Anyway, they are using people as pawns.

00:12:51.700 They're using people who have been bullied as pawns and it's really disgusting.

00:12:58.020 Don't fall for it.

00:12:59.000 This is the tactic to try and get authoritarianism into Canada.

00:13:02.200 Don't fall for it.

00:13:03.580 And another reason why I want to emphasize here on, you know, why this is clearly just

00:13:10.420 a power play is nobody is really that concerned with what they're talking about.

00:13:18.920 You talk to these people on the podcast, like you'll talk to Guy Boatts, oh, it's this big

00:13:22.820 problem.

00:13:23.560 And I don't, I'm not a big guy on like, you know, touting numbers, like just because something

00:13:27.600 is popular.

00:13:28.140 But it is pretty instructive that the Canadian Race Relations Foundation is helping build

00:13:33.840 this infrastructure that is going to create an authoritarian internet in Canada.

00:13:38.120 And they only have like under two, they have less followers than me on Facebook.

00:13:43.860 You know, they have less, they have less followers than me on Twitter as well.

00:13:49.220 And I'm not trying to like denigrate this organization, but it's like they're making it seem like everyone

00:13:55.040 is really passionate about this issue when that's just simply not the case.

00:13:58.760 That is simply not the case.

00:14:00.340 And once again, it's very disgusting that they are using these people and their sad stories,

00:14:05.840 they're using them as pawns to try and install this authoritarian internet, this police state

00:14:11.800 on the internet.

00:14:12.740 And I predict, I predict there is going to be a tidal wave of this stuff.

00:14:17.940 I think this victim porn is going to take off.

00:14:20.560 I think there's going to be a lot more coming to try and get this bill passed.

00:14:24.340 And while we're on the topic, oh my God, the smears and the slandering is going to be non-stop.

00:14:33.000 They're going to say everybody, actually, Gilboa has already said this, everybody who opposes

00:14:37.720 this internet censorship is an extremist, right?

00:14:42.060 And they're also going to say white supremacists.

00:14:44.540 They're going to say the risms, all the isms, all the this and that.

00:14:48.140 And we can't fall for it.

00:14:49.800 We can't fall for it.

00:14:51.360 Conservatives cannot fall for this.

00:14:53.060 And I want to make this video to get ahead of the conversation because I'm predicting

00:14:56.500 this is what we're going to see.

00:14:59.000 And I don't have that much faith in our conservative party anymore.

00:15:04.160 So I don't know if they're going to fight this stuff.

00:15:06.380 They might be right on board with stopping racism and dishonestly not telling you that

00:15:11.620 this is what's going to install Chinese-like authoritarianism on our internet. 0.77

00:15:18.020 And that's why we have to fight this.

00:15:20.000 And I was doing more research on the Canadian Race Relations Foundations and the new executive

00:15:25.380 director since this past October is Mohamed Hashim.

00:15:29.600 And for those who don't know, I mean, it's kind of interesting.

00:15:32.280 This is the guy that's helping create this legislature for what is harmful online.

00:15:38.240 And this is the same guy who Fury from Toronto Sun alleges he's the spin doctor behind the

00:15:45.640 Hussein family statement.

00:15:47.040 So the Hussein family statement is actually in regards to the Danforth shooting.

00:15:52.700 And a lot of the narrative around the Danforth shooting was from this letter, which is like

00:15:58.440 he's been struggling with psychosis and depression his entire life.

00:16:02.780 Um, and you know what, this is a tragedy.

00:16:05.880 So like, I don't want to be too inflammatory about the topic.

00:16:09.260 Obviously it really sucks what happened.

00:16:12.080 What I'm pretty sure is alleged in this article is that this, uh, this guy, the director of

00:16:19.140 this, um, now Canadian Race Relations Foundation actually helped, um, the media not connect the

00:16:26.640 dots as hard because, you know, that was kind of the narrative. 0.88

00:16:29.760 He, okay, he was mentally ill, blah, blah, blah. 0.75

00:16:33.300 Um, when in reality, uh, and this is an article that came out later, older brother of Toronto

00:16:39.840 mass shooter was facing drug and weapons charges.

00:16:43.100 And of course the narrative is, oh, they're down on their luck or what have you.

00:16:47.420 Um, what's really crazy though.

00:16:49.640 It's like, this is this, his, his brother, I thought it was his cousin, but, um, they

00:16:55.440 discovered 33 guns and seized 42 kilograms of what was identified as car fentanyl.

00:17:01.800 This is like some of the, one of the like deadliest substances there is.

00:17:05.820 Um, and of course, you know, all the things can be said about, oh, he was a Muslim and

00:17:10.600 he went to this mosque and they said this stuff at the mosque.

00:17:13.660 I won't get into that, but my point is, is, uh, this guy is, you know, I don't want to

00:17:22.340 say that he's spinning things dishonestly.

00:17:24.920 Like he's kind of, you know, he's spinning stuff to make his fellow Muslim brothers, you 1.00

00:17:31.100 know, look, look not as bad when they go on the Danforth and shoot up a place. 0.70

00:17:35.860 You know, I, I understand that he wants to protect his, his Muslim, Muslim brothers.

00:17:41.140 And I was listening to this podcast, um, where he's talking about this anti-hate legislation

00:17:47.480 coming up.

00:17:48.640 I'll play a clip for it in a second, but, um, he talks about, he doesn't talk about the

00:17:53.900 Danforth shooting, of course.

00:17:55.080 No, he talks about the, the, the, the horrible shooting that happened at a mosque in Montreal.

00:18:00.480 I guess I should bring up, by the way, you know, just to compare the Danforth shooting

00:18:04.520 to the mosque shooting, like if they found out that the Bisonette shooter was like connected

00:18:10.900 to like some white supremacy group that had like a whole bunch of guns, like that would

00:18:15.380 be a pretty big story.

00:18:16.560 That would be a massive story.

00:18:18.100 Like it would, it would be fair to call them, you know, here, here's your white supremacist 0.99

00:18:22.580 terrorists. 0.99

00:18:23.060 We found them.

00:18:23.960 They shot up this mosque.

00:18:25.200 Like there's the story, but it's interesting how with the Danforth one, even though they

00:18:29.860 found someone related to this guy had a stockpile of guns and car fentanyl.

00:18:34.520 Like that didn't really hit the news cycle very hard.

00:18:38.140 So I think that's worth bringing up in terms of a comparison.

00:18:41.800 But, um, in this podcast, I'm going to share a clip of talking about this hate speech legislature.

00:18:47.900 Muhammad mentioned, um, the, the shooting at the mosque, which is horrible.

00:18:54.500 But then he also brought up January 6th.

00:18:56.520 He brought up January 6th in, um, the, the Capitol riot, the Capitol riot, which I thought

00:19:03.780 was very, a very interesting kind of like curveball.

00:19:06.320 Like, Oh, you're like the Capitol riot has really turned into this magnet of, uh, Oh, like,

00:19:11.780 you know, the bad right-wing people, like these evil right-wing people.

00:19:15.260 And my final point here, which I'm going to kind of delve into, I already started to delve

00:19:20.260 into is the people building this hate speech legislation are so flagrantly biased that

00:19:29.840 it's kind of baffling.

00:19:31.660 And I'm going to play you a clip from this podcast, which really just sums it up and

00:19:37.480 ties it all together here.

00:19:38.760 There's all these issues of like, Oh, I just, I was just joking.

00:19:41.520 It was actually just done in satire.

00:19:43.160 So it's not, it wasn't, I wasn't actually like spreading hate content.

00:19:46.660 So there's definitely a lot of, um, a lot of gray area there.

00:19:49.700 Um, so I mean, just to go off that for a second, like one of our board members, Emily

00:19:54.680 Nicolau, who was a huge anti-racism activist, did actually put out a bunch of comments that

00:20:00.460 were sarcastic and Twitter took her down and locked her profile for two weeks. 0.98

00:20:04.880 This lady's a journalist. 1.00

00:20:06.280 And they locked her, like locked her, uh, uh, thing down.

00:20:09.740 So just to emphasize one of my original points, these are the people making hate speech legislature.

00:20:16.380 They're designing it in Canada with the heritage minister.

00:20:20.360 They even agree.

00:20:21.760 This stuff is difficult.

00:20:23.140 It's hard.

00:20:24.280 It doesn't make any sense.

00:20:25.760 Why were they censored?

00:20:26.840 Why wasn't this person censored?

00:20:28.140 It's almost like, it's almost like everybody has their own bias and trying to enforce anything 0.98

00:20:33.960 outside of existing hate speech laws would be an absolute shit show. 0.85

00:20:38.980 And really what's only going to happen, it's just going to be enforcing some sort of, uh, 0.95

00:20:43.420 authoritarianism, you know, who has the power, who gets to decide, you know, it's who has

00:20:48.740 the power, who's going to decide.

00:20:50.020 But anyway, the major point is coming up.

00:20:52.340 I mean, I don't trust, I don't, I have not, like the algorithms that they've created right

00:20:58.260 now don't work.

00:20:59.580 They're not fair.

00:21:00.820 So I want things to be taken down that could potentially be harmful, especially incitement

00:21:06.520 to violence, anything that has real life threats to it.

00:21:08.880 Those things are already illegal, Muhammad, Mr. Hashim. 0.91

00:21:13.680 I'm sure you know that, but I just want to remind you those things, incitement to violence,

00:21:17.540 hate speech as defined in our criminal code, already illegal, but let's continue.

00:21:22.580 Get it taken down, you know, let's deal with this, if the threat levels appropriately, but

00:21:27.820 also, but the stuff that is a bit more nuanced, um, it needs to be taken down for sure, but

00:21:34.160 that's kind of weird.

00:21:35.880 The stuff that's more nuanced needs to be taken down for sure.

00:21:40.240 Huh?

00:21:42.000 I, I'm not, I don't really know what he meant by that, but anyway, guys, I was doing research

00:21:48.120 on this and like, the more you hear them talk about it, the more back to my original point,

00:21:53.320 what is harmful content?

00:21:54.900 How do we regulate this?

00:21:56.020 It's just a bigger and bigger question mark.

00:21:59.240 Once again, it's thinly veiled authoritarianism, but anyway.

00:22:02.040 And, and that, that's funny to me that they were so quick to take, take down her like

00:22:07.080 tweet.

00:22:07.860 They didn't do that with, uh, Trump, but you know.

00:22:12.420 So there's the CEO of Abacus Data.

00:22:14.740 This is the executive director of Canadian Race Relations Foundation.

00:22:18.360 And then the host says, Miriam, yeah, your friend got taken down for her tweets, but yeah,

00:22:25.040 with tweets like Trump, huh, they just leave up those tweets.

00:22:29.140 No one corrected her.

00:22:34.080 Okay.

00:22:36.260 No one corrected her.

00:22:39.100 No one said anything.

00:22:40.680 No one said, oh, actually, Miriam, you're mistaken.

00:22:44.760 Uh, Donald Trump has been banned from Twitter permanently.

00:22:48.700 He's off of Twitter.

00:22:50.120 He's gone.

00:22:50.820 He's a goner.

00:22:51.520 No, actually, speaking of censorship and speaking of people who have been silenced and censored

00:22:57.340 by big tech already.

00:22:58.880 Uh, no, you actually, Miriam, sorry.

00:23:01.100 We're the people who are like going to be designing all this hate speech infrastructure in Canada.

00:23:07.020 We should probably tell you since we're experts that Trump was banned off of Twitter.

00:23:12.400 No mention of that.

00:23:14.840 And I feel this is very telling.

00:23:17.140 The CEO of Abacus Data doesn't want to talk about the censored conservative.

00:23:21.040 The executive director of Canadian Race Relations Foundation doesn't want to talk about the censored

00:23:25.420 conservative.

00:23:26.280 And once this legislation is in, they're not going to talk about all the censored conservatives.

00:23:33.480 That's not going to be what they focus on.

00:23:34.940 It's going to be like, no, we're just keeping everybody safe.

00:23:37.640 For keeping a safe online environment, what do you mean censored conservative?

00:23:41.540 What are you talking about?

00:23:43.000 It's very, very instructive that they did not clarify to the host when talking about this

00:23:49.580 very contentious issue, which they just admitted how contentious it is and how confusing it is.

00:23:55.500 They're not going to clarify.

00:23:57.540 Oh, yeah, actually, sorry, Miriam.

00:23:59.020 Trump was, has been banned from Twitter, actually.

00:24:03.700 And it's funny because I started to do the research.

00:24:06.780 I was like, wait a minute, why was Trump officially banned?

00:24:11.300 I knew he got banned, but why was he actually banned?

00:24:14.380 And boy, oh boy, is it, is it super relevant that we have permanently suspended the account

00:24:18.900 due to the risk of further incitement of violence.

00:24:21.760 There's that term again, incitement of violence.

00:24:25.140 And this, and this big blog, Twitter blog is their excuse, their reasoning of why they

00:24:30.960 banned pretty well the most popular politician in existence right now.

00:24:36.480 For those who don't know, he got the most votes of any sitting president in history and

00:24:43.260 still lost.

00:24:44.760 Wow.

00:24:46.140 But he's kind of a popular guy, kind of a popular guy.

00:24:49.100 Due to the ongoing tensions in the United States, an uptick in the global conversation

00:24:54.460 in regards to the people who violently stormed the Capitol on January 6th, these two tweets

00:24:58.740 must be read in the context of broader events in the country and the ways in which the president's

00:25:04.520 statements can be mobilized by different audiences, including to incite violence, as well in the

00:25:09.980 context of the pattern of behavior from this account in recent weeks.

00:25:13.780 After assessing the language in these tweets against our glorification of violence policy,

00:25:19.700 we have determined that these tweets are in violation of the glorification of violence

00:25:23.960 policy and the user at real Donald Trump should be immediately permanently suspended from the

00:25:29.340 service.

00:25:29.780 This is disturbing because this is a big tech platform justifying censorship by saying this

00:25:37.520 is the intention of everybody else.

00:25:39.940 This was the intention of Donald Trump.

00:25:42.640 This was the intention of the people receiving Trump's tweet, and it's crazy because it's

00:25:48.740 just kind of assuming bad stuff on everybody who wrote the tweet, everybody who readed the

00:25:54.580 tweet, and it's a great example of how if you just expand the definition of hate speech

00:26:01.100 or just expand glorification of violence, you can justify banning pretty well anybody for

00:26:06.640 anything.

00:26:08.020 Here's the reasoning.

00:26:09.040 The second tweet may also serve as encouragement to those potentially considering violent acts

00:26:15.860 that the inauguration would be a safe target as he will not be attending.

00:26:20.360 So this is referring to him saying, hey, I'm not going to be at the inauguration January

00:26:24.040 20th.

00:26:25.180 Isn't that disturbing that a famous person tweeting out, hey, I'm not going to, I'm actually not

00:26:31.220 going to be at this thing. 0.75

00:26:32.080 That's like, yeah, that's actually a dog whistle sign to like tell white supremacists terrorists 0.99

00:26:40.420 to like attack. 0.72

00:26:42.520 Like it's, it's really, it's actually like a conspiracy theory in a way.

00:26:47.480 Like it's kind of like they're, they're getting, they're banning the guy based on their own

00:26:51.860 conspiracy that they've created.

00:26:53.540 It's kind of, it's pretty wild.

00:26:57.020 The use, I love this one, the use of the words American patriots to describe some of his supporters

00:27:03.160 is also being interpreted as support for those committing violent acts at the U.S. Capitol.

00:27:09.680 So even saying the term American patriots is interpreted as supporting violence.

00:27:17.320 The words American patriots now means supporting violence.

00:27:23.300 I mean, I think you get the point.

00:27:24.940 I don't think I need to keep reading here because the point is, is, you know, when you have the

00:27:30.520 glorification of violence policy, if, if, if you want to justify banning a political figure,

00:27:36.720 you can.

00:27:38.620 And I'm sorry if any conservative in Canada doesn't think that this next, next hate speech

00:27:45.540 bill, whatever it is, this thinly veiled authoritarianism, if they don't think that this is about silencing 1.00

00:27:51.840 conservatives or silencing any political dissent to the Trudeau regime, they're stupid. 1.00

00:27:58.640 They're stupid or they're scared or they're controlled opposition. 1.00

00:28:03.200 I don't know what to say. 1.00

00:28:05.160 So this is from global U S at higher risk of domestic terror assaults after Capitol riot.

00:28:10.360 I bring this up because there's a, there's been like a line drawn to say that people who

00:28:16.580 were at the Capitol were terrorists.

00:28:19.520 And a lot of people believe that if you talk to a lot of normies, they will say, yes, like

00:28:23.880 it, there were terrorists there.

00:28:25.380 It's domestic terrorism.

00:28:26.620 Let's talk to one of the terrorists who was at the Capitol riots or Capitol siege.

00:28:33.140 Uh, I feel like my vote didn't count again.

00:28:36.620 I think the leftist and all those people who are against Trump, President Trump, will form

00:28:45.080 a kind of tyranny.

00:28:46.880 And I'm from China.

00:28:48.460 I know the terrible facts about CCP, the evilness.

00:28:53.920 So I'm afraid that this land become not free anymore.

00:28:59.160 That's why I'm here to support President Trump.

00:29:01.360 Beautiful.

00:29:03.020 And there's a lot of other, I mean, there's like hundreds of thousands of people there

00:29:07.180 at the Capitol, but, um, you know, speaking of terrorism, proud boys, because Canada declared

00:29:13.040 the proud boys shortly after January 6th, a terrorist group.

00:29:16.440 I don't know much at all about the proud, but proud boys.

00:29:20.660 Um, but, uh, I'm curious, you're like, you know, how many statues have the proud boys

00:29:28.960 torn down?

00:29:29.540 Have they torn down any statues?

00:29:32.840 How many, like, windows have they smashed?

00:29:35.400 This is rioters and looters, uh, destroying Montreal after a BLM protest, uh, last year, May 0.99

00:29:45.620 30th.

00:29:46.820 You know, people call BLM terrorist organizations.

00:29:52.880 They call Antifa terrorist organizations.

00:29:55.780 And you can make an argument for that.

00:29:57.680 And you might say, oh, Greg, you're not showing the clips from the Capitol siege.

00:30:00.760 I can show those two.

00:30:02.080 And guess what?

00:30:04.100 You can, you can make an argument for that.

00:30:06.440 You can make an argument for that.

00:30:08.000 You can make an argument for both.

00:30:09.720 Is this terrorism?

00:30:11.780 Protesters aren't on the track.

00:30:13.140 Is this terrorism?

00:30:14.000 They are near them.

00:30:15.560 And today.

00:30:15.880 Well, these people were never called terrorists.

00:30:18.500 That's, that's definitely the act of a terrorist.

00:30:21.040 Okay.

00:30:21.420 But we, we never called them terrorists.

00:30:23.340 No, it's just the, just the proud boys, right?

00:30:25.820 I mean, they haven't stopped any, uh, railroads.

00:30:28.020 They haven't disrupted our supply chain. 0.94

00:30:30.040 But, uh, yeah, they're, they're real bad terrorists.

00:30:33.260 We can't start systematically letting the liberal party define what is and isn't okay online.

00:30:41.800 Because we know what, that's what this bill is going to manifest as.

00:30:45.020 And while we're talking about incitements to violence, let's talk about Joanne Roberts. 0.62

00:30:48.940 She was the interim Green Party leader.

00:30:51.580 This is one of her famous tweets.

00:30:52.940 Fellow white women, we need to step up. 1.00

00:30:54.700 Stop calling the BLM protests looting and rioting.

00:30:57.780 Repeat after me.

00:30:58.580 There is no comfortable way to fight oppression.

00:31:00.900 What's happening across the U.S. and Canada is valid, right, and necessary.

00:31:06.300 Get on board.

00:31:08.120 You know, is, is that incitement to violence?

00:31:10.520 And of course, Andy Ngo on TikTok.

00:31:12.740 He covers people from Antifa who, you know, Portland Antifa leader Phoebe A. Loomis, 37,

00:31:18.960 was arrested at the May Day riot and charged with a felony.

00:31:21.640 She was quickly released without bail.

00:31:23.160 She was previously convicted for her role at another May Day riot in 2017.

00:31:26.840 She has an Antifa gang tattoo on her chest.

00:31:29.460 She has a lot of combat gear here. 0.99

00:31:32.260 That, you know, this sounds like a terrorist.

00:31:35.600 This sounds like, could be associated with terrorism.

00:31:39.140 So I think you get the point, okay?

00:31:41.500 You know, things are very politically polarized right now.

00:31:45.340 And we can't allow the Liberal Party to change the definition of hate speech or expand the definition

00:31:52.860 of hate speech and what a terrorist is and what incitement to violence is.

00:31:57.180 Because if we look at examples from the states, it means silencing conservatives.

00:32:02.840 It means bullying conservatives.

00:32:05.140 It means silencing voices to those who resist the Trudeau regime.

00:32:10.540 You know, it doesn't take a rocket scientist, doesn't take a genius to figure this out.

00:32:14.520 We know this is coming.

00:32:15.640 We know that's what it's going to look like.

00:32:17.140 Like, so we shouldn't fall for this really disgusting race baiting that they always do 0.89

00:32:22.900 and this, like, victim porn that they're going to show everybody because it's just thinly 0.96

00:32:26.780 veiled authoritarianism.

00:32:28.140 We need to know that.

00:32:28.960 We need to stand up to that.

00:32:30.300 And we need to stop the censorship.

00:32:32.240 We need to stop the internet censorship because this is going to be way, way worse.

00:32:37.480 Way, way worse than people think.

00:32:38.980 They're going to try to gently bring it in and they're going to slowly build a police

00:32:43.640 RCMP force that's going to monitor and surveil everything online and it's going to look something

00:32:50.140 like the authoritarian Chinese by the time they're done with it. 0.95

00:32:52.760 We need to stop this in its tracks.

00:32:54.680 But most importantly, we need to call it out for what it is.

00:32:58.060 Okay?

00:32:58.740 Don't get sucked in to this whole, like, oh, well, if I oppose the hate speech bill, then

00:33:05.120 I must be pro-hate speech. 1.00

00:33:06.880 Oh, man.

00:33:07.660 This is the oldest trick in the book.

00:33:10.220 They use this every single time.

00:33:12.100 Change the frame, conservatives, and come out strong against it.

00:33:16.380 Because speaking of harmful content, speaking of dismissing people entirely, you know, someone

00:33:23.420 was saying something, oh, rotten language turns off those who might otherwise agree with

00:33:27.800 you.

00:33:28.640 And I responded, let's be real.

00:33:30.740 People are getting tired of the fake niceness that plagues everything politically correct.

00:33:36.260 People still out here, passive-aggressively dismissing and dehumanizing entire groups

00:33:41.960 of people, all while acting nice and polite.

00:33:45.560 Oh, but they sounded so sweet and charming.

00:33:49.360 This is what the liberals always do.

00:33:50.780 But guess what?

00:33:51.240 They are dehumanizing and dismissing regular Canadian people, hardworking Canadian people,

00:33:56.800 and in the worst case, Canadian veterans.

00:33:59.540 We've all seen this clip, but we can't emphasize this enough.

00:34:03.300 This is, I forget his last name, Brock, I believe his first name is.

00:34:06.700 Thank you for your service, Brock, and this is him confronting Trudeau.

00:34:11.200 So which veteran was it that you were talking about?

00:34:16.920 Why are we still fighting against certain veterans groups in court?

00:34:22.460 Because they're asking for more than we are able to give right now.

00:34:27.480 They are asking. 0.99

00:34:28.520 Like, that's fucking harmful content, in my opinion. 1.00

00:34:31.460 That's fucking hate speech. 1.00

00:34:33.780 And, you know, fuck Trudeau. 1.00

00:34:37.520 Okay? 1.00

00:34:38.100 Like, I'm not afraid to say that.

00:34:39.520 And no one should be afraid to say that, especially after something like this,

00:34:43.080 where you're going to dismiss and dehumanize someone who not only fought for our country,

00:34:48.740 but this guy actually lost his leg fighting for our country. 0.97

00:34:52.960 This man right here, this real man, an actual man with testicles and a backbone. 0.98

00:34:59.560 Not this, like, virgin leaner over here. 0.99

00:35:03.920 Okay?

00:35:04.220 I'm talking about this man here. 0.99

00:35:07.460 We need to stand up for ourselves, and we need to cut through the bullshit. 0.99

00:35:12.600 We can't keep listening to this polite niceness. 0.98

00:35:16.420 If people haven't realized how political correctness works,

00:35:20.420 let me give you a quick summary.

00:35:21.700 Political correctness is this huge basket of rules that keep on expanding, 1.00

00:35:28.780 and, you know, all white people are racist, and all men are toxic, 0.98

00:35:31.480 and if you don't do the right thing, you're going to get in trouble. 0.99

00:35:33.920 There are so many rules that can get you in trouble and get you canceled.

00:35:39.700 But here's the thing.

00:35:41.480 The rules are only there to be enforced against certain people.

00:35:47.000 Right back, coming full circle to the beginning.

00:35:49.280 The rules didn't apply to this guy.

00:35:52.640 Why not?

00:35:53.600 Well, because of his politics.

00:35:55.940 Because of whose team he was on.

00:35:58.360 And this expansion of these hate speech laws and this incoming bill is going to be the exact same story.

00:36:06.660 It's only going to apply to certain people.

00:36:09.720 It's only going to be enforced in different ways.

00:36:12.320 And as I clarified, you know, love you, Hashim, but if you're not going to really care about violence on certain sides of the spectrum,

00:36:24.480 if you're not even going to clarify how, you know, Donald Trump was banned from Twitter and, like, you don't think that's relevant to the conversation of Internet censorship and policing hate speech,

00:36:38.260 and you're the one, you're the one who's creating this legislation to be applied all across the Canadian Internet.

00:36:45.400 We're in big trouble, folks.

00:36:48.900 We need to fight this.

00:36:50.480 We need to fight this bill.

00:36:52.560 And when I say fight, I don't mean, like, inciting violence against people. 0.64

00:36:56.780 It kind of sucks that I have to say that to clarify that.

00:36:59.820 I meant fight in a figurative way. 0.65

00:37:01.940 I didn't mean it in a literal way.

00:37:04.240 You see how annoying this is?

00:37:07.060 Anyway, that's it.

00:37:08.360 Thank you so much for watching all of this.

00:37:11.000 That's the research I've done.

00:37:12.640 We need to look out for all the slander that's coming this week.

00:37:15.800 There's going to be a lot of slander that I think is coming in these weeks.

00:37:19.440 It's going to say, oh, the alt-right unites against hate speech bill.

00:37:24.780 White supremists unite against hate speech bill. 0.99

00:37:27.920 Oh, my God, these horrible people, the extremists. 0.95

00:37:32.420 Who would want to not save these victims?

00:37:36.580 All that stuff's going to come.

00:37:37.860 And we can't fall for it.

00:37:39.780 And we can't be afraid of it.

00:37:41.560 We need to stand up against authoritarianism.

00:37:45.120 It's thinly veiled authoritarianism where liberals are just using people as pawns,

00:37:51.320 as they always do, using marginalized groups as pawns. 0.97

00:37:54.660 Don't fall for it, folks.

00:37:56.700 It's obvious.

00:37:58.400 Thank you for watching.

00:37:59.760 Make sure you like this video.

00:38:01.620 Make sure you share it with people who will find it relevant and interesting.

00:38:04.580 And obviously, subscribe and sign the petition that we've started.

00:38:09.580 We're going to update this petition.

00:38:11.420 It's a petition against this new hate speech bill.

00:38:13.680 It's the only petition of its kind.

00:38:15.180 Everyone's petitioning against Bill C-10, and I'm all for that.

00:38:18.240 Fight Bill C-10.

00:38:19.420 Absolutely.

00:38:19.820 But this next bill, I'm going to have an update for the petition.

00:38:24.760 Sign it now.

00:38:25.560 Get ahead of the game.

00:38:26.580 Let's be proactive about this, conservatives.

00:38:28.940 Let's be on top of this legislation.

00:38:31.300 And let's fight against it because this is the issue.

00:38:35.080 This is the issue of our time in Canada, okay?

00:38:37.940 If we don't have freedom of speech online, then it's the beginning of the end, all right?

00:38:43.860 So we need to fight this.

00:38:45.120 Let's keep freedom alive in Canada.

00:38:47.660 Thanks for watching.

00:38:48.780 We'll talk to you soon.

Greg Wycliffe - May 03, 2021

Bill C-63 - How Trudeau Plans to Censor Our Internet

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript