Bill C-63 - How Trudeau Plans to Censor Our Internet
Episode Stats
Words per minute
162.98357
Harmful content
Misogyny
8
sentences flagged
Hate speech
15
sentences flagged
Summary
If I was a power hungry politician, and I wanted to create powers so I could silence and censor anyone I wanted, how would I convince the public in a free, free, Western society? Would they agree with me?
Transcript
00:00:00.040
If I was a power-hungry politician and I wanted to control everything that was said on the internet
00:00:06.480
and I wanted to create powers so I could silence and censor anybody I wanted,
00:00:11.960
how would I possibly convince the public in a free Western society?
00:00:17.220
How would I convince them to say that's a good idea?
00:00:20.740
I'm a Canadian, my name is Greg, and in this video I'm going to show you exactly how the Trudeau regime
00:00:28.220
Everyone is talking about Bill C-10 right now, the internet censorship that's coming to Canada.
00:00:35.260
Hopefully it will be resisted, we need to stop Bill C-10,
00:00:38.200
but what not many people are talking about is the upcoming bill that I believe is being tabled this week.
00:00:44.860
Right now it is Monday, May 3rd, early in the morning, that's when I'm making this video,
00:00:50.480
and I want to show you the research that I've done on this upcoming bill,
00:00:54.320
what I predict it's going to be, how it's going to be sold to Canadians,
00:01:00.100
and also just the disgusting things that Guilbeau and the Trudeau Liberals are trying to do
00:01:08.780
And finally, make sure you tune in until the end,
00:01:11.640
because I'll show you who's actually building the legislature for this upcoming bill,
00:01:22.160
But we have a lot to get through, so let me hop into it.
00:01:24.800
And first of all, let's just remove all doubt about the real true intentions of this bill.
00:01:33.580
They want to install an RCMP of the internet, essentially.
00:01:38.420
So they have the power to police speech online,
00:01:42.100
they will have the power to eventually fine you and possibly jail you,
00:01:47.100
Let's go to this interview here with our pal, Mr. Guilbeau.
00:01:53.260
Let's hear him talking about describing the bill.
00:02:03.440
This is him describing the, this is our goal with this new legislature.
00:02:09.120
And third, there's the work our government has been doing over the past few years
00:02:22.820
The number one reason why we know this is authoritarianism
00:02:39.920
Is showing this image of Trudeau and blackface an online harm?
00:02:48.400
It might be harmful for black people or indigenous people or Saudi Arabians.
00:02:53.880
Um, is, I mean, are we going to erase part of our heritage?
00:03:00.220
You know, is, is, could this be harmful if blackface is brought up in the wrong context?
00:03:08.620
Wife beating guidance by Qatari official, Dr. Ahmed Al-Farjabi on Al Jazeera TV.
00:03:18.720
Women almost unanimously agree that beating is better than letting the wives ruin their families.
1.00
00:03:31.440
And by the way, I mean, are we going to censor Dr. Ahmed Al-Farjabi?
00:03:37.320
Wouldn't silencing a Sharia expert, wouldn't that be Islamophobic to silence somebody like this?
00:03:46.220
But at the same time, you know, this is sounding kind of sexist, what he's saying.
00:04:10.000
Louie, listen, it's Miger, not Migger, bro.
1.00
00:04:16.920
I haven't seen my penis in eight years, all right?
00:04:23.560
And furthermore, if you go into the comments, someone said, am I the only black person who
00:04:41.180
How are we going to regulate, are we going to delete old Mad TV sketches off the internet
00:04:46.300
There's no end to this question of what is harmful content.
00:04:53.120
And the number one reason why we know this legislature is thinly veiled authoritarianism
00:04:59.500
is because they can't answer this question of defining what the harmful content is.
00:05:05.060
However, this is what Mr. Gilbo goes on to say.
00:05:09.360
Developing legislation to deal with online harms to address hate speech,
00:05:14.180
child sexual exploitation content, terrorism content, content that incites violence,
00:05:20.680
and a non-consensual sharing of intimate images online.
00:05:24.920
All five of those things he listed are already illegal.
00:05:36.360
Terrorism content, inciting violence, and non-consensual sharing of images.
00:05:48.660
This is the second reason why we know this is thinly veiled authoritarianism.
00:05:52.860
Because the things that they're saying that we're going to stop are already illegal.
00:05:56.840
So, what is the purpose of this new legislature?
00:06:08.300
What, we're going to get thrown in jail and fined and all this?
00:06:12.760
This is why I'm saying it's thinly veiled authoritarianism.
00:06:16.240
There's a reason this new legislature is getting grouped in with these things.
00:06:26.000
They're going to expand the definition of hate speech.
00:06:27.960
They're going to expand this wide blanket of harmful content.
00:06:32.040
And then basically, if you have the wrong political opinion, actually, you're a terrorist.
00:06:38.100
Actually, you know, you're as bad as somebody who distributes child.
00:06:49.960
They're going to dress it up with all this pretty language, all this pretty stuff.
00:07:01.120
Like I said, they do not define harmful content.
00:07:04.760
No one can answer this question of what is harmful, what is not harmful.
00:07:11.180
So it's just a big, fat excuse to censor and silence who they want.
00:07:20.160
We've seen too many examples of public officials retreating from public service due to the hateful
00:07:26.260
online content targeted towards themselves or even their families.
00:07:30.720
This is another clear tell that this is about authoritarianism because they're mentioning
00:07:51.120
Police launch hate crime investigation after a man yells obscenities at Catherine McKenna
00:08:00.180
When I walk downtown Toronto, I'll have homeless drunk people yelling obscenities at me.
00:08:08.400
Of course, people are going to be yelling at her.
00:08:10.380
But no, it's a hate crime to yell at a public official now.
00:08:14.980
And by the way, if you've seen the clip of this man, yeah, he does say the C word.
00:08:22.620
But he does have his stats and his facts with him.
00:08:24.940
And it's like, Miss McKenna, you've misplaced, like, what was it, tens, 20,000 different
00:08:32.020
infrastructure projects of, like, taxpayer money.
00:08:35.340
Like, she did mess up and someone's getting angry and now it's a hate crime.
00:08:41.200
And you can imagine if they apply the same logic of a hate crime of some Canadian getting
00:08:46.740
angry at a public official, you can just imagine how they would apply that online.
00:08:50.880
Oh, you're complaining about Justin Trudeau and our safety minister, Bill Blair, lowering
00:08:59.280
the sentences for people who smuggle illegal guns into Canada?
00:09:08.080
Of course, that makes me angry because at the same time, they're taking away guns from
00:09:23.540
And by the way, this is, the next thing he's going to say here is the most disgusting part
00:09:32.200
My original question is, if I was a power hungry politician trying to control everything on the
00:09:38.460
internet, how the heck, how the heck would I sell this to people?
00:09:44.040
And the answer is, using black people and indigenous people and marginalized groups as pawns.
1.00
00:09:50.820
It's not a new tactic by the Liberal Party, but boy, is it their favorite.
00:09:56.420
Based on a national survey from the Canadian Race Relations Foundation, we know that the
00:10:01.340
vast majority of Canadians are worried about hate speech online and that the government
00:10:05.940
should be doing more to prevent hateful behavior online.
00:10:09.380
So, notice how he stuck those two points together.
00:10:14.380
He stuck the one point of, oh, Canadian public officials feel really safe online.
00:10:20.040
By the way, we did this Canadian racism poll and we found that people really don't like
00:10:25.660
racism and really don't like hate speech online.
00:10:28.500
You see how they just kind of snipped those two kind of points together?
00:10:32.540
And this right here is the Canadian Race Relations Foundation Facebook page and it's really disgusting
00:10:37.880
what they're doing because they're kind of creating like victim porn where they're glorifying
00:10:49.860
You know, and this person's recounting a scenario where someone like throws a cigarette butt at
00:10:58.180
It's not a good excuse to now police all speech and content online and protect government
00:11:08.920
They're taking these people's sad stories and saying, okay, now we get to protect ourselves
00:11:18.200
I think they want to install the RCMP of the internet so they can silence and censor who
00:11:25.260
Sorry to break it to you folks, but this is the play.
00:11:29.440
They don't really care about this poor woman and her experience.
00:11:35.120
They care about fetishizing it and capturing it and using those tears, using those sweet
00:11:41.580
tears so we can get our authoritarian internet.
00:11:46.480
And this is not the only video like this at all.
00:11:50.900
And, you know, I don't like to victimize myself.
00:11:56.600
I think that you're going to deal with assholes in life.
00:12:06.280
I had volunteers yelled at in the street, like 18-year-old volunteer, like physically
00:12:13.300
I had someone of Indian descent volunteering for me.
00:12:20.120
Because he was associated with the People's Party of Canada.
00:12:22.840
You know, like I didn't make some long video about him crying when he got stuff thrown
00:12:29.100
It was horrible and it's disturbing and it's totally fucked up, especially when you consider
00:12:33.200
a lot of the misinformation about the People's Party of Canada was spread by our mainstream
00:12:39.180
Shout out to Warren Kinsella, by the way, that spineless slug guy.
00:12:51.700
They're using people who have been bullied as pawns and it's really disgusting.
00:12:59.000
This is the tactic to try and get authoritarianism into Canada.
00:13:03.580
And another reason why I want to emphasize here on, you know, why this is clearly just
00:13:10.420
a power play is nobody is really that concerned with what they're talking about.
00:13:18.920
You talk to these people on the podcast, like you'll talk to Guy Boatts, oh, it's this big
00:13:23.560
And I don't, I'm not a big guy on like, you know, touting numbers, like just because something
00:13:28.140
But it is pretty instructive that the Canadian Race Relations Foundation is helping build
00:13:33.840
this infrastructure that is going to create an authoritarian internet in Canada.
00:13:38.120
And they only have like under two, they have less followers than me on Facebook.
00:13:43.860
You know, they have less, they have less followers than me on Twitter as well.
00:13:49.220
And I'm not trying to like denigrate this organization, but it's like they're making it seem like everyone
00:13:55.040
is really passionate about this issue when that's just simply not the case.
00:14:00.340
And once again, it's very disgusting that they are using these people and their sad stories,
00:14:05.840
they're using them as pawns to try and install this authoritarian internet, this police state
00:14:12.740
And I predict, I predict there is going to be a tidal wave of this stuff.
00:14:20.560
I think there's going to be a lot more coming to try and get this bill passed.
00:14:24.340
And while we're on the topic, oh my God, the smears and the slandering is going to be non-stop.
00:14:33.000
They're going to say everybody, actually, Gilboa has already said this, everybody who opposes
00:14:37.720
this internet censorship is an extremist, right?
00:14:42.060
And they're also going to say white supremacists.
00:14:44.540
They're going to say the risms, all the isms, all the this and that.
00:14:53.060
And I want to make this video to get ahead of the conversation because I'm predicting
00:14:59.000
And I don't have that much faith in our conservative party anymore.
00:15:04.160
So I don't know if they're going to fight this stuff.
00:15:06.380
They might be right on board with stopping racism and dishonestly not telling you that
00:15:11.620
this is what's going to install Chinese-like authoritarianism on our internet.
0.77
00:15:20.000
And I was doing more research on the Canadian Race Relations Foundations and the new executive
00:15:25.380
director since this past October is Mohamed Hashim.
00:15:29.600
And for those who don't know, I mean, it's kind of interesting.
00:15:32.280
This is the guy that's helping create this legislature for what is harmful online.
00:15:38.240
And this is the same guy who Fury from Toronto Sun alleges he's the spin doctor behind the
00:15:47.040
So the Hussein family statement is actually in regards to the Danforth shooting.
00:15:52.700
And a lot of the narrative around the Danforth shooting was from this letter, which is like
00:15:58.440
he's been struggling with psychosis and depression his entire life.
00:16:05.880
So like, I don't want to be too inflammatory about the topic.
00:16:12.080
What I'm pretty sure is alleged in this article is that this, uh, this guy, the director of
00:16:19.140
this, um, now Canadian Race Relations Foundation actually helped, um, the media not connect the
00:16:26.640
dots as hard because, you know, that was kind of the narrative.
00:16:29.760
He, okay, he was mentally ill, blah, blah, blah.
0.75
00:16:33.300
Um, when in reality, uh, and this is an article that came out later, older brother of Toronto
00:16:39.840
mass shooter was facing drug and weapons charges.
00:16:43.100
And of course the narrative is, oh, they're down on their luck or what have you.
00:16:49.640
It's like, this is this, his, his brother, I thought it was his cousin, but, um, they
00:16:55.440
discovered 33 guns and seized 42 kilograms of what was identified as car fentanyl.
00:17:01.800
This is like some of the, one of the like deadliest substances there is.
00:17:05.820
Um, and of course, you know, all the things can be said about, oh, he was a Muslim and
00:17:10.600
he went to this mosque and they said this stuff at the mosque.
00:17:13.660
I won't get into that, but my point is, is, uh, this guy is, you know, I don't want to
00:17:24.920
Like he's kind of, you know, he's spinning stuff to make his fellow Muslim brothers, you
1.00
00:17:31.100
know, look, look not as bad when they go on the Danforth and shoot up a place.
00:17:35.860
You know, I, I understand that he wants to protect his, his Muslim, Muslim brothers.
00:17:41.140
And I was listening to this podcast, um, where he's talking about this anti-hate legislation
00:17:48.640
I'll play a clip for it in a second, but, um, he talks about, he doesn't talk about the
00:17:55.080
No, he talks about the, the, the, the horrible shooting that happened at a mosque in Montreal.
00:18:00.480
I guess I should bring up, by the way, you know, just to compare the Danforth shooting
00:18:04.520
to the mosque shooting, like if they found out that the Bisonette shooter was like connected
00:18:10.900
to like some white supremacy group that had like a whole bunch of guns, like that would
00:18:18.100
Like it would, it would be fair to call them, you know, here, here's your white supremacist
00:18:25.200
Like there's the story, but it's interesting how with the Danforth one, even though they
00:18:29.860
found someone related to this guy had a stockpile of guns and car fentanyl.
00:18:34.520
Like that didn't really hit the news cycle very hard.
00:18:38.140
So I think that's worth bringing up in terms of a comparison.
00:18:41.800
But, um, in this podcast, I'm going to share a clip of talking about this hate speech legislature.
00:18:47.900
Muhammad mentioned, um, the, the shooting at the mosque, which is horrible.
00:18:56.520
He brought up January 6th in, um, the, the Capitol riot, the Capitol riot, which I thought
00:19:03.780
was very, a very interesting kind of like curveball.
00:19:06.320
Like, Oh, you're like the Capitol riot has really turned into this magnet of, uh, Oh, like,
00:19:11.780
you know, the bad right-wing people, like these evil right-wing people.
00:19:15.260
And my final point here, which I'm going to kind of delve into, I already started to delve
00:19:20.260
into is the people building this hate speech legislation are so flagrantly biased that
00:19:31.660
And I'm going to play you a clip from this podcast, which really just sums it up and
00:19:38.760
There's all these issues of like, Oh, I just, I was just joking.
00:19:43.160
So it's not, it wasn't, I wasn't actually like spreading hate content.
00:19:46.660
So there's definitely a lot of, um, a lot of gray area there.
00:19:49.700
Um, so I mean, just to go off that for a second, like one of our board members, Emily
00:19:54.680
Nicolau, who was a huge anti-racism activist, did actually put out a bunch of comments that
00:20:00.460
were sarcastic and Twitter took her down and locked her profile for two weeks.
0.98
00:20:06.280
And they locked her, like locked her, uh, uh, thing down.
00:20:09.740
So just to emphasize one of my original points, these are the people making hate speech legislature.
00:20:16.380
They're designing it in Canada with the heritage minister.
00:20:28.140
It's almost like, it's almost like everybody has their own bias and trying to enforce anything
00:20:33.960
outside of existing hate speech laws would be an absolute shit show.
00:20:38.980
And really what's only going to happen, it's just going to be enforcing some sort of, uh,
00:20:43.420
authoritarianism, you know, who has the power, who gets to decide, you know, it's who has
00:20:52.340
I mean, I don't trust, I don't, I have not, like the algorithms that they've created right
00:21:00.820
So I want things to be taken down that could potentially be harmful, especially incitement
00:21:06.520
to violence, anything that has real life threats to it.
00:21:08.880
Those things are already illegal, Muhammad, Mr. Hashim.
0.91
00:21:13.680
I'm sure you know that, but I just want to remind you those things, incitement to violence,
00:21:17.540
hate speech as defined in our criminal code, already illegal, but let's continue.
00:21:22.580
Get it taken down, you know, let's deal with this, if the threat levels appropriately, but
00:21:27.820
also, but the stuff that is a bit more nuanced, um, it needs to be taken down for sure, but
00:21:35.880
The stuff that's more nuanced needs to be taken down for sure.
00:21:42.000
I, I'm not, I don't really know what he meant by that, but anyway, guys, I was doing research
00:21:48.120
on this and like, the more you hear them talk about it, the more back to my original point,
00:21:59.240
Once again, it's thinly veiled authoritarianism, but anyway.
00:22:02.040
And, and that, that's funny to me that they were so quick to take, take down her like
00:22:07.860
They didn't do that with, uh, Trump, but you know.
00:22:14.740
This is the executive director of Canadian Race Relations Foundation.
00:22:18.360
And then the host says, Miriam, yeah, your friend got taken down for her tweets, but yeah,
00:22:25.040
with tweets like Trump, huh, they just leave up those tweets.
00:22:40.680
No one said, oh, actually, Miriam, you're mistaken.
00:22:44.760
Uh, Donald Trump has been banned from Twitter permanently.
00:22:51.520
No, actually, speaking of censorship and speaking of people who have been silenced and censored
00:23:01.100
We're the people who are like going to be designing all this hate speech infrastructure in Canada.
00:23:07.020
We should probably tell you since we're experts that Trump was banned off of Twitter.
00:23:17.140
The CEO of Abacus Data doesn't want to talk about the censored conservative.
00:23:21.040
The executive director of Canadian Race Relations Foundation doesn't want to talk about the censored
00:23:26.280
And once this legislation is in, they're not going to talk about all the censored conservatives.
00:23:34.940
It's going to be like, no, we're just keeping everybody safe.
00:23:37.640
For keeping a safe online environment, what do you mean censored conservative?
00:23:43.000
It's very, very instructive that they did not clarify to the host when talking about this
00:23:49.580
very contentious issue, which they just admitted how contentious it is and how confusing it is.
00:23:59.020
Trump was, has been banned from Twitter, actually.
00:24:03.700
And it's funny because I started to do the research.
00:24:06.780
I was like, wait a minute, why was Trump officially banned?
00:24:11.300
I knew he got banned, but why was he actually banned?
00:24:14.380
And boy, oh boy, is it, is it super relevant that we have permanently suspended the account
00:24:18.900
due to the risk of further incitement of violence.
00:24:21.760
There's that term again, incitement of violence.
00:24:25.140
And this, and this big blog, Twitter blog is their excuse, their reasoning of why they
00:24:30.960
banned pretty well the most popular politician in existence right now.
00:24:36.480
For those who don't know, he got the most votes of any sitting president in history and
00:24:46.140
But he's kind of a popular guy, kind of a popular guy.
00:24:49.100
Due to the ongoing tensions in the United States, an uptick in the global conversation
00:24:54.460
in regards to the people who violently stormed the Capitol on January 6th, these two tweets
00:24:58.740
must be read in the context of broader events in the country and the ways in which the president's
00:25:04.520
statements can be mobilized by different audiences, including to incite violence, as well in the
00:25:09.980
context of the pattern of behavior from this account in recent weeks.
00:25:13.780
After assessing the language in these tweets against our glorification of violence policy,
00:25:19.700
we have determined that these tweets are in violation of the glorification of violence
00:25:23.960
policy and the user at real Donald Trump should be immediately permanently suspended from the
00:25:29.780
This is disturbing because this is a big tech platform justifying censorship by saying this
00:25:42.640
This was the intention of the people receiving Trump's tweet, and it's crazy because it's
00:25:48.740
just kind of assuming bad stuff on everybody who wrote the tweet, everybody who readed the
00:25:54.580
tweet, and it's a great example of how if you just expand the definition of hate speech
00:26:01.100
or just expand glorification of violence, you can justify banning pretty well anybody for
00:26:09.040
The second tweet may also serve as encouragement to those potentially considering violent acts
00:26:15.860
that the inauguration would be a safe target as he will not be attending.
00:26:20.360
So this is referring to him saying, hey, I'm not going to be at the inauguration January
00:26:25.180
Isn't that disturbing that a famous person tweeting out, hey, I'm not going to, I'm actually not
00:26:32.080
That's like, yeah, that's actually a dog whistle sign to like tell white supremacists terrorists
00:26:42.520
Like it's, it's really, it's actually like a conspiracy theory in a way.
00:26:47.480
Like it's kind of like they're, they're getting, they're banning the guy based on their own
00:26:57.020
The use, I love this one, the use of the words American patriots to describe some of his supporters
00:27:03.160
is also being interpreted as support for those committing violent acts at the U.S. Capitol.
00:27:09.680
So even saying the term American patriots is interpreted as supporting violence.
00:27:17.320
The words American patriots now means supporting violence.
00:27:24.940
I don't think I need to keep reading here because the point is, is, you know, when you have the
00:27:30.520
glorification of violence policy, if, if, if you want to justify banning a political figure,
00:27:38.620
And I'm sorry if any conservative in Canada doesn't think that this next, next hate speech
00:27:45.540
bill, whatever it is, this thinly veiled authoritarianism, if they don't think that this is about silencing
00:27:51.840
conservatives or silencing any political dissent to the Trudeau regime, they're stupid.
00:27:58.640
They're stupid or they're scared or they're controlled opposition.
00:28:05.160
So this is from global U S at higher risk of domestic terror assaults after Capitol riot.
00:28:10.360
I bring this up because there's a, there's been like a line drawn to say that people who
00:28:19.520
And a lot of people believe that if you talk to a lot of normies, they will say, yes, like
00:28:26.620
Let's talk to one of the terrorists who was at the Capitol riots or Capitol siege.
00:28:36.620
I think the leftist and all those people who are against Trump, President Trump, will form
00:28:48.460
I know the terrible facts about CCP, the evilness.
00:28:53.920
So I'm afraid that this land become not free anymore.
00:28:59.160
That's why I'm here to support President Trump.
00:29:03.020
And there's a lot of other, I mean, there's like hundreds of thousands of people there
00:29:07.180
at the Capitol, but, um, you know, speaking of terrorism, proud boys, because Canada declared
00:29:13.040
the proud boys shortly after January 6th, a terrorist group.
00:29:16.440
I don't know much at all about the proud, but proud boys.
00:29:20.660
Um, but, uh, I'm curious, you're like, you know, how many statues have the proud boys
00:29:35.400
This is rioters and looters, uh, destroying Montreal after a BLM protest, uh, last year, May
0.99
00:29:46.820
You know, people call BLM terrorist organizations.
00:29:57.680
And you might say, oh, Greg, you're not showing the clips from the Capitol siege.
00:30:15.880
Well, these people were never called terrorists.
00:30:18.500
That's, that's definitely the act of a terrorist.
00:30:25.820
I mean, they haven't stopped any, uh, railroads.
00:30:30.040
But, uh, yeah, they're, they're real bad terrorists.
00:30:33.260
We can't start systematically letting the liberal party define what is and isn't okay online.
00:30:41.800
Because we know what, that's what this bill is going to manifest as.
00:30:45.020
And while we're talking about incitements to violence, let's talk about Joanne Roberts.
0.62
00:30:54.700
Stop calling the BLM protests looting and rioting.
00:30:58.580
There is no comfortable way to fight oppression.
00:31:00.900
What's happening across the U.S. and Canada is valid, right, and necessary.
00:31:12.740
He covers people from Antifa who, you know, Portland Antifa leader Phoebe A. Loomis, 37,
00:31:18.960
was arrested at the May Day riot and charged with a felony.
00:31:23.160
She was previously convicted for her role at another May Day riot in 2017.
00:31:35.600
This sounds like, could be associated with terrorism.
00:31:41.500
You know, things are very politically polarized right now.
00:31:45.340
And we can't allow the Liberal Party to change the definition of hate speech or expand the definition
00:31:52.860
of hate speech and what a terrorist is and what incitement to violence is.
00:31:57.180
Because if we look at examples from the states, it means silencing conservatives.
00:32:05.140
It means silencing voices to those who resist the Trudeau regime.
00:32:10.540
You know, it doesn't take a rocket scientist, doesn't take a genius to figure this out.
00:32:17.140
Like, so we shouldn't fall for this really disgusting race baiting that they always do
0.89
00:32:22.900
and this, like, victim porn that they're going to show everybody because it's just thinly
00:32:32.240
We need to stop the internet censorship because this is going to be way, way worse.
00:32:38.980
They're going to try to gently bring it in and they're going to slowly build a police
00:32:43.640
RCMP force that's going to monitor and surveil everything online and it's going to look something
00:32:50.140
like the authoritarian Chinese by the time they're done with it.
0.95
00:32:54.680
But most importantly, we need to call it out for what it is.
00:32:58.740
Don't get sucked in to this whole, like, oh, well, if I oppose the hate speech bill, then
00:33:12.100
Change the frame, conservatives, and come out strong against it.
00:33:16.380
Because speaking of harmful content, speaking of dismissing people entirely, you know, someone
00:33:23.420
was saying something, oh, rotten language turns off those who might otherwise agree with
00:33:30.740
People are getting tired of the fake niceness that plagues everything politically correct.
00:33:36.260
People still out here, passive-aggressively dismissing and dehumanizing entire groups
00:33:51.240
They are dehumanizing and dismissing regular Canadian people, hardworking Canadian people,
00:33:59.540
We've all seen this clip, but we can't emphasize this enough.
00:34:03.300
This is, I forget his last name, Brock, I believe his first name is.
00:34:06.700
Thank you for your service, Brock, and this is him confronting Trudeau.
00:34:11.200
So which veteran was it that you were talking about?
00:34:16.920
Why are we still fighting against certain veterans groups in court?
00:34:22.460
Because they're asking for more than we are able to give right now.
00:34:28.520
Like, that's fucking harmful content, in my opinion.
00:34:39.520
And no one should be afraid to say that, especially after something like this,
00:34:43.080
where you're going to dismiss and dehumanize someone who not only fought for our country,
00:34:48.740
but this guy actually lost his leg fighting for our country.
00:34:52.960
This man right here, this real man, an actual man with testicles and a backbone.
00:35:07.460
We need to stand up for ourselves, and we need to cut through the bullshit.
00:35:12.600
We can't keep listening to this polite niceness.
00:35:16.420
If people haven't realized how political correctness works,
00:35:21.700
Political correctness is this huge basket of rules that keep on expanding,
00:35:28.780
and, you know, all white people are racist, and all men are toxic,
0.64
00:35:31.480
and if you don't do the right thing, you're going to get in trouble.
00:35:33.920
There are so many rules that can get you in trouble and get you canceled.
00:35:41.480
The rules are only there to be enforced against certain people.
00:35:47.000
Right back, coming full circle to the beginning.
00:35:58.360
And this expansion of these hate speech laws and this incoming bill is going to be the exact same story.
00:36:09.720
It's only going to be enforced in different ways.
00:36:12.320
And as I clarified, you know, love you, Hashim, but if you're not going to really care about violence on certain sides of the spectrum,
00:36:24.480
if you're not even going to clarify how, you know, Donald Trump was banned from Twitter and, like, you don't think that's relevant to the conversation of Internet censorship and policing hate speech,
00:36:38.260
and you're the one, you're the one who's creating this legislation to be applied all across the Canadian Internet.
00:36:52.560
And when I say fight, I don't mean, like, inciting violence against people.
00:36:56.780
It kind of sucks that I have to say that to clarify that.
00:37:12.640
We need to look out for all the slander that's coming this week.
00:37:15.800
There's going to be a lot of slander that I think is coming in these weeks.
00:37:19.440
It's going to say, oh, the alt-right unites against hate speech bill.
00:37:24.780
White supremists unite against hate speech bill.
00:37:27.920
Oh, my God, these horrible people, the extremists.
00:37:45.120
It's thinly veiled authoritarianism where liberals are just using people as pawns,
00:37:51.320
as they always do, using marginalized groups as pawns.
0.97
00:38:01.620
Make sure you share it with people who will find it relevant and interesting.
00:38:04.580
And obviously, subscribe and sign the petition that we've started.
00:38:11.420
It's a petition against this new hate speech bill.
00:38:15.180
Everyone's petitioning against Bill C-10, and I'm all for that.
00:38:19.820
But this next bill, I'm going to have an update for the petition.
00:38:31.300
And let's fight against it because this is the issue.
00:38:37.940
If we don't have freedom of speech online, then it's the beginning of the end, all right?