00:15:36.960Well, I was just saying it was bad timing for me
00:15:39.220to get out of the military in September of 2021 because the full-scale tyranny really hit
00:15:43.040in about November 2021 when the Omicron wave came and they had the vaccine. And at that point,
00:15:50.040they were like, okay, everybody is going to take it now. And actually, that was the first time I
00:15:55.000got arrested post-military career was in November of 2021 because I was actually standing in line
00:16:03.340at the Nova Scotia Liquor Commission buying my medically prescribed cannabis and they
00:16:10.480came out and said like everybody's got a mask up and I said no I'm exempt because that was
00:16:14.340what I was doing at the time and they said no we're not we're not doing any exemptions
00:16:17.940everybody's got a mask up and I was like well you can't do that that's a human rights violation
00:16:22.680it's discrimination on the basis of an irrational fear of contracting a disease and that's
00:16:29.120Prohibitive Grounds for Discrimination, one of the Nova Scotia Human Rights Act. So you have to
00:16:34.200serve me. You can't deny me service on this basis. And anyway, they called the cops and they didn't
00:16:39.760leave. Yeah. So I got arrested. And that was kind of what I was doing before the convoy actually
00:16:47.520was just defying mandates, filing human rights complaints, trying to get them into court.
00:16:52.560um and uh then the convoy happened and honestly like i had been off social media for over a year
00:16:59.160or something like that i had no idea there was ever even anything like a freedom movement or
00:17:03.380the people were starting to um engage on any of these issues i just wasn't aware and then when
00:17:09.860the freedom convoy happened i was like oh my god i'm not alone so i i knew exactly where i had to
00:17:14.880be and um well um you know i guess the rest is history it was an honor and a privilege with so
00:17:23.940many vets in ottawa i gotta tell you that i was some of the proudest days walking downtown and
00:17:27.940meeting so many people from all across the country that were you know serving our country
00:17:31.520putting their lives on the line and here they're standing with us in ottawa it was uh it was an
00:17:36.900honor yeah it was uh i i think i don't think i ever felt so good in my life as i did while i
00:17:44.260was at the Freedom Convoy that was by far like hands down the most overwhelming display
00:17:53.940of true loving patriotism that I have ever seen. Never felt so proud of my service, never
00:17:59.920felt so proud to be a Canadian. It was something really special like we've never seen.
00:18:06.100And we got to meet all good people like you guys.
00:18:10.820Exactly. Alison, tell us a little about what's coming up for court now. Do you think there's
00:18:15.620a chance that the courts or the government will appeal this decision that was overturned?
00:18:23.380I mean, I can't speculate as to what they're going to do, but I can say that the decision was
00:18:31.220very solid in the sense that the Supreme Court of Canada in the Dory decision and followed up
00:18:37.460by a case called Commission Scholaire has held repeatedly that when an administrative decision
00:18:44.620maker makes a decision that engages charter interests, that's values and rights, even if
00:18:50.800the right is not infringed, as long as rights are engaged in the action that they want to take,
00:18:58.040that there has to be evidence that the government considered those charter interests. And
00:19:06.660engaged with them? Meaning, you know, there has to be something written down that says that they
00:19:13.260considered that in this case, mobility rights would be engaged by a total ban of walking in
00:19:20.820the forest. And is there no way that this policy can be structured or drafted that would
00:19:27.740um be you know the the most minimally impairing um is there any other option other than banning
00:19:36.640everyone from the forest and you know maybe the government would say well no we can't do anything
00:19:41.340else because this this this this and this but we've but we've thought about it we've understood
00:19:45.620that that you know liberty and and freedom of movement is going to be engaged here but we've
00:19:50.960we've we've thought about it we've met on it and these are the reasons why it doesn't work or or
00:19:55.560maybe we've met on it and now we're going to do something a little different to take that into
00:20:01.180account. But they didn't do any of that here. And that was required by the Supreme Court of Canada.
00:20:05.860You really can't get around it. So they did not, in any of their documents, use the word charter
00:20:12.040at all. What they did was they considered the interests of commercial industries. They considered
00:20:20.000that the forest industry needed access to the forest to go about their, to continue their
00:20:24.920businesses and and other people that relied on the forest to um for their income they considered
00:20:31.880those those industries interests but there's there's actually a section called legal in their
00:20:37.640in their decision making when the documents that were produced in the in the case it's called legal
00:20:42.180but nowhere in there does it consider the needs and interests of you know regular nova scotians
00:20:47.560who want to go for a walk in the woods want to hike in the woods and maybe need the woods for
00:20:52.540their their their medical health their medical treatment you know like like jeff evely so um
00:20:58.220because they didn't do that because the word charter doesn't appear anywhere and they didn't
00:21:02.060engage with it in our in our view that would be a waste of time to appeal it really would
00:21:08.540because the supreme court is very clear on that issue is there any repercussions any repercussions
00:21:15.980um after this finding i mean we're living in a country where it seems like the charter rights
00:21:21.580of canadians are the last concern for our elected officials and our governments and you know as
00:21:28.780we're as we're seeing happen with the with the invocation of the emergencies act and justice
00:21:33.260mosley's ruling they're obviously just kicking the can kicking the can down the road but there's
00:21:38.780still been absolutely no accountability nobody's been punished there has not even been a fine
00:21:43.580there hasn't even been an apology yeah yeah no it's it's elton can i get a i just this is a
00:21:52.860question that comes up and i if you can see that at the bottom the charter does not protect the
00:21:57.900individual we should be using the bill of rights can you give your legal perspective on the bill
00:22:03.740of rights versus the charter please because this is i fight these fights all the time
00:22:08.940and i would like to get it from an actual lawyer yeah so the the canadian bill of rights is
00:22:15.500applicable to federal government action and the alberta bill of rights is applicable to
00:22:22.140alberta government action um so if you're not in if it's not a federal government issue or
00:22:29.500a policy or law or an alberta one then the bill of rights doesn't apply so the the bill of rights
00:22:34.940wouldn't apply to this particular case but you know we've researched this before um certainly
00:22:40.780it's worth pleading alongside the charter and i know there are um i know there are people uh sort
00:22:47.100of freedom group freedom types um that believe that because of section one in the charter
00:22:55.740because of the the ability for government to justify uh limiting rights that the bill of
00:23:01.900Rights is the way to go. I've looked at the cases where the Bill of Rights was invoked and the
00:23:07.900courts basically have found that they're going to use the same test as the Charter and they just
00:23:15.820defer to the Charter. So the case law is not very helpful in this area and I haven't seen a case
00:23:22.860where someone just uses the Bill of Rights outside of the Charter but I know that judges are very
00:23:28.540deferential to using the charter and following those tests so um it's not something that we
00:23:35.100could have done in in this case but i you know i still i still believe that that the charter um
00:23:41.660is it's there to protect the individual i mean um the courts you know certainly during covid were
00:23:48.860very deferential to government but uh i i you know we haven't lost faith in our charter it is
00:23:55.020there to protect us and it's just a matter of um you know how how the courts are going to rule on
00:24:02.860a particular issue and uh what is the you know what is the political uh sentiment of of the time
00:24:09.820and unfortunately it was pretty standard outside of the emergencies uh act decision that courts
00:24:16.380across the country during covid were really not receptive to any arguments other than deference
00:24:21.340to government. So I understand the frustration that people are feeling. And I think the thought
00:24:26.720is, you know, if we can just put in an argument that doesn't rely on Section 1 as the government's
00:24:32.920way to get out of limiting the charter rate, maybe there's a win there. I haven't seen a case where
00:24:37.500that has happened. So it's difficult for me to say what that would look like. But as I said,
00:24:42.320I do know that when they're both put together, the court does reference the charter and doesn't
00:24:49.440really do much with the bill of rights so it's an interesting point uh i i would like to see it you
00:24:54.500know how it plays out in a court but i i haven't lost faith in our charter i've you know i'm hopeful
00:25:00.640that uh as as time marches on and and our freedoms are increasingly threatened that that courts will
00:25:07.020will you know step up a little bit more and uh and and want to help protect canadians so i i'm
00:25:14.020hopeful for that. There is definitely a lot of criticism of the Charter that I've seen anytime
00:25:19.960I post about it or in this case or the invitation of the EA, but I believe it is there to protect
00:25:25.820us too. I think we're just living in a time where the interpretation by some of the judges or the
00:25:32.840legal system itself is where this is falling by the wayside, how our rights are falling by the
00:25:39.540wayside if that makes any sense i don't believe it's the charter itself and i don't know you know
00:25:45.240we spent enough time with brian peckford actually jeff came out with us two summers ago now it'll
00:25:50.400be two summers this year and when we went out and visited the peckfords and he's just so proud of
00:25:56.140that thing you know i i just it's amazing and why how they are not parading um former premier
00:26:04.460peckford around the country to talk at schools and universities and town halls and to be when i
00:26:09.980was a kid that's exactly what we would have we would have these types of people coming in to
00:26:13.580speak to us so i think it's an actual travesty that we have you know one of the last draftees
00:26:18.780and segment and the last signatory of the charter of rights and freedoms alive well um and being
00:26:25.340completely ignored he's absolutely being ignored i mean he was ignored in uh in his case that we
00:26:31.260that we took uh tried to get to the Supreme Court of Canada the vaccine mandate for the for air
00:26:36.540travel uh he had an affidavit where he talked about the fact that he was the last living signatory to
00:26:42.380the charter and uh in that you know his charter rights are being infringed by not being able to
00:26:47.260fly across the country and the federal government's lawyers didn't want to cross-examine him at all
00:26:53.500they didn't want to hear from him and of course the media barely touched that story and it was
00:26:58.860it was a huge critically important case even though it got dismissed for mootness it was a
00:27:03.740critically important case to bring for mobility rights and they you know the media didn't want
00:27:09.340to talk to him and it's it's really it's i mean it's shocking and it isn't it is and it isn't
00:27:16.140it is in the sense of decent common decency and uh just for you know democratic discourse
00:27:24.300we should be hearing from somebody who was there at the table when the document was drafted
00:27:28.060and had a hand in doing that and but then again you know during covid everybody was shut down
00:27:34.940and had a dissenting voice and and whether it was scientists um you know anybody of any sort
00:27:41.660of significance that the media didn't want to hear from so unfortunately premier peckford was
00:27:47.420silenced as well and i think it's a travesty yeah it is it's absolutely a travesty one other way to
00:27:54.220try and make him sound well i guess they tried to make him sound like he was crazy or delusional
00:27:59.100and that is not the case brian peckford is firing on all cylinders and anybody any time with them
00:28:05.340you would know that he's very well spoken and uh yeah it's an honor every time jeff and a few other
00:28:11.660people candace there's a bunch of other people we got to do some pretty cool stuff out and
00:28:16.220where were we parksville yeah birthday parksville got to take a yacht ride it was uh it was an
00:28:22.380amazing experience and one that was an old yacht from the 50s restoring yeah just kidding i just
00:28:34.860kidding that'll be all over to him that's hilarious it's the first time okay well yes that's right
00:28:44.300yeah that was your first time that far east that's right that was for the reclaiming canada
00:28:48.860conference we were at yeah yeah we were at uh was it reclaiming canada i thought it was we unify
00:28:56.460we if i reclaiming canada conference okay yeah yeah that's right yeah yeah so um allison before
00:29:04.220we let you go i know you've got to you've got to go um be with your family is there any key points
00:29:08.860or any takeaways that that struck you that you want to talk about before we let you go
00:29:13.100Yeah, I mean, this was a very interesting case and we put in affidavit evidence and
00:29:20.940a lot of that affidavit evidence didn't make it into the final decision because
00:29:25.340there were four main legal arguments that we had to try and get a win on this case and
00:29:30.940the judge basically stuck with the first argument that was the strong argument. And if we had lost
00:29:37.340that, he would have done the rest of the tests for the rest of the arguments. But because he
00:29:41.980He, you know, rightly so, he found that this decision to put in the forest travel ban was unreasonable because they didn't consider charter interests.
00:29:54.440But the other tests for, you know, liberty, security of the person, we had affidavit evidence that was very interesting and just made me shake my head when I was meeting with the principal fire investigator for 30 years, Mr. Peter MacIsaac.
00:30:11.120He used to work for the government of Nova Scotia, you know, helping to investigate fires.
00:30:16.240And he was real. His knowledge on this issue was profound.
00:30:21.120And some of the things that he would that he told me and made it made it into his affidavit.
00:30:26.880Here in Alberta, we have 100 fire towers and fire towers.
00:30:30.400If you're not aware, the tower in the middle of the forest and someone is paid to climb up and sit at the top.
00:30:36.720And they are an excellent spotter of smoke.
00:30:39.200they were the first line of defense for fire and it was very effective and in Nova Scotia in 2013
00:30:45.660the decision was made by the Department of Natural Resources to decommission these fire towers that
00:30:50.960they had and so the first line of defense against forest fire in a province where forests comprised
00:30:55.76080 percent of the province were taken down and Mr. MacIsaac advised that he was in meetings
00:31:04.460as this was happening or about to happen, and he was told that the thought was, well, the next line
00:31:09.980of defense that we don't need the fire towers anymore because citizens walking through the
00:31:14.560forest with cell phones are going to be the ones now to spot fires. They can call for help. They
00:31:19.800can call and report arsonists. So now the citizens are the ones that we rely on. And now, now the
00:31:27.060citizens are banned from walking in the forest. There's no more fire towers. I mean, you just
00:31:31.360shake your head is just unbelievable. So there's a lot more depth to this case than than what
00:31:36.800appeared in the written decision. And the judge, of course, did what he needed to do to come to the
00:31:41.900right conclusion, we say. But some of that other evidence was relevant to other parts of the legal
00:31:46.980test. And it was just really very interesting to hear this. In our view, it looked like, you know,
00:31:54.140forced mismanagement. And instead of putting those towers back, which, you know, perhaps that's the
00:32:00.900right decision, they punished Nova Scotia citizens instead by banning everybody from
00:32:07.200the forest. And it's just, it's just complete overkill. And it's just such a pleasure for
00:32:11.400us to put that case in, have those discussions with the court and get the result that we
00:55:09.760Carney was the guy who wrote the article in the Globe and Mail calling us all seditionists
00:55:16.000and saying that it was time to restore the rule of law in Canada.
00:55:20.560And Mr. Conflict of Interest himself would have been one of those investment class types,
00:55:29.060corporate types that soaked up all the wealth from the small business sector during the pandemic so
00:55:35.260he would have been profiting personally because that's what happened during the pandemic it was
00:55:39.180the greatest transfer of wealth from the small business sector to the corporate sector from the
00:55:43.320young to the old in all of human history from from the lower class to the upper class he's an
00:55:49.480upper class guy he's making tons of cash off of the pandemic because of his investments and advising
00:55:55.840trudeau at the at the same time to uh to keep everything locked down and uh align everything
00:56:03.280in canada all of uh government of canada spending with uh brookfield's bottom line basically as he
00:56:10.240was moving brookfield down to the united states to uh to be headquartered there and offshore
00:56:17.280their accounts so he doesn't have to pay taxes in canada but anyway he was the guy who called
00:56:22.320us all seditionists he was right next to trudeau the entire time he was his advisor i think the
00:56:27.600trudeau was just the wizard of oz and uh mark kearney was the man behind the curtain the entire
00:56:33.360time it's just that now he's taking um and uh for a long time i mean he they've been talking
00:56:42.880they've been floating mark carney's name around for probably a minimum of four to five years
00:56:47.280i see this comment just popped up here but i gotta go on to this guy my farts have color like
00:56:56.800valid point valid point what caught me was your username mr and i yeah i kind of like that
00:57:04.000having color in your farts is probably not a good thing but
00:57:08.640i want to get that checked yeah yeah that's right yeah that's right
00:57:12.160So Jeff, your mischief child, you were found guilty, obviously. Did you let that go? Did you
00:57:19.540appeal it? What happened? We did. And the Court of Appeals refused to hear it. And I said, what
00:57:26.720about the Supreme Court? But I was talking to Chris Floria from the Justice Center. And he said,
00:57:32.300you know, there has never been a case in history where the appeals court declined to hear your
00:57:36.940appeal and then the uh the supreme court accepted it so i said okay i mean i don't want to waste
00:57:43.200judicial resources so i guess this is the end of the line uh it was disappointing and um you know
00:57:49.740i i did i was allowed back in ottawa a little bit for my trial um while i was being tried there and
00:57:57.180uh i i don't know it's just i walked away from it saying i feel like i just got tried by the cbc
00:58:03.440because um i the the way that the judge came to her decision um saying things like you know
00:58:13.640obviously uh the rule of law had broken down and it was pandemonium in the streets and
00:58:18.880she's talking she's basically regurgitating headlines and i i uh like i just remember like
00:58:26.520we go to so much trouble to make sure that if we're going to say something in court that
00:58:32.660we have to make sure the evidence is on the record. We have to stand on the evidence. And
00:58:38.120then the judge just ruled on headlines. And I was like, none of that was ever in the record.
00:58:45.360Nobody entered that evidence into the record, the kinds of things that she said in her decision. So
00:58:49.320I was, I thought to myself, I said to Chris Flurry, I was like, you know, maybe we could
00:58:56.760stand on that in an appeal. And he was like, yeah, maybe. And we tried. And anyway, it just
00:59:01.620didn't go anywhere um i think it's going to be a number of years before we really see the kind
00:59:06.320of judicial reform that we we need um yeah so when people stand up and have enough i'm curious if
00:59:13.440you know tamara and i's cases are about to go in front of the the appeals court that same appeals
00:59:18.300court now will they do the same decision that they did for you or will this be politically
00:59:22.520motivated and we'll be back at her again it's a great question um yours is definitely higher
00:59:28.940profile than mine um so perhaps it would be given more careful consideration um you know mine was
00:59:37.820just sort of a routine and some of the stuff about this one more thing about my case sorry to make
00:59:43.700this about me but no but this is all about this you're the guest buddy that is about you it is
00:59:49.900it was all of us um because was it rumlewski i think there was a guy named rumlewski he uh
00:59:58.440unfortunately died before his case got to the supreme court and i think his uh his wife was
01:00:03.480still pursuing it after he died but i think it was declined ultimately yeah yeah and so i remember
01:00:13.280saying to chris flurry i was like they're they're citing precedent to charge me and the precedent
01:00:20.840they're citing is other convoy cases and he was like well they would say that those are the ones
01:00:26.820most closely relate to your circumstances i was like yeah but they're all precedent setting
01:00:30.900this was an unprecedented historic event and everybody is disputing that it was necessary to
01:00:38.740take this uh protest apart that like the ema has already fallen apart um and so i find it to be
01:00:46.580highly inappropriate that they're using other convoy cases as case law as precedent in my uh
01:00:54.180in my uh conviction and he was like yeah i never thought about it like or but it's just i guess
01:00:59.300the way the law works and so the process the prosecutor who got romlewski was also coming
01:01:05.860after me using his own case to to prosecute me while romlewski was um applying for leave from
01:01:15.220the supreme court so i'm like this is a live controversy it's not exactly set of case law
01:01:20.340You could go back to 1968 if you want to talk about common law, ancillary powers, doctrine, or something like that.
01:01:29.100That's where the case law really comes from there.
01:01:30.920So we have like five or six decades of case law that you could be relying on, but you're using your own politically motivated persecution of Remlewski.
01:08:35.720Are you expecting a fantastic turnout?
01:08:41.360It seems like there's quite a bit of interest.
01:08:44.660Ticket sales, I'm told Ottawa is always last minute at this stuff.
01:08:49.020So we're not exactly sold out just yet, but word is getting around.
01:08:56.360And I think really, even when it comes to the rally and stuff like that,
01:09:02.680it's not like our politicians care if we protest.
01:09:05.720No, I don't think so. I think there is we have we have some Christine has been helping with the plan for the rally and the march around town with some key locations where we can maybe catch interested people coming into town for the strong and free conference when it comes to Ottawa, because that'll be starting the day after our rallies.
01:09:24.000so we thought maybe we could um generate some interest those those people coming into town on
01:09:28.560that day would be uh probably interested in the subject as well um and uh but i think really a
01:09:36.080what this is all about is the parliamentary press conference um we got to get into the mainstream
01:09:42.000we got to start waking people up um whether mainstream you know cbc ctv globalists are
01:09:50.400going to show up is always anybody's guess i'm told that the folks of the parliamentary press
01:09:56.640gallery think there will be interest from mainstream in this particular topic and uh
01:10:02.080we'll have cpac there for sure and uh i'm sure we can count on you know national post western
01:10:08.480standards uh sun news network um those types of people to uh to come as well the the issue though
01:10:15.600is that um the parliamentary press gallery kind of gets to decide who is legitimate media and
01:10:20.400who isn't um and it's all based on apparently the tax status so if the cra doesn't give you
01:10:28.720the uh the tax incentives as a news organization then you don't get into the parliamentary press
01:10:34.480gallery so it's uh it's an excuse um it's an excuse well we will get uh i think if you don't
01:10:42.320right kind of exposure parent the government narrative then they won't uh they won't let
01:10:46.320you in basically the mean girl media i call it now it's basically what it is oh isn't it terrible
01:10:52.960uh they're not they're not even grown-ups it's just you know you're not allowed to go buy alcohol
01:10:58.880in province i live until you're an adult 19 years old you're not allowed to buy cigarettes i don't
01:11:03.760know what the year for cigarettes is you're not allowed to buy weed but yeah you can go
01:11:07.760do transition therapy and hormone blockers at you know protect our children i love what you're doing
01:11:14.960here jeff i'm not against any lbgq plus you could be as proud as you want to be but this is different
01:11:21.760in my understanding and i want people to wake up to this yeah and we are not uh this is not this
01:11:28.320has nothing to do with anybody's identity or sexuality or anything like that has nothing to do
01:11:33.280with what consenting informed capable adults are doing with their own bodies even when it comes to
01:11:38.880these kinds of surgeries um but we're talking about kids and like the dutch protocol is to give
01:11:45.520them puberty blockers at 12 and start them on cross-sex hormones um during adolescence they're
01:11:51.280they've given double mastectomies to about a thousand under 18 uh girls some of them as young
01:11:59.120as 14 in canada they're giving um the uh the orchid yorkiectomies and radical hysterectomies
01:12:06.880like chemical castration sterile sterilizing surgeries to 18 year olds um and of course
01:12:13.520like if you ask an adolescent um are you sure you don't want to have kids they're going to say no
01:12:18.880no of course i don't want to have kids like we all said that at that age but you know we we grow
01:12:25.600as people over time and um you know our uh our goals in life or what we value in life tends to
01:12:33.440um evolve with us so um it's it's just a crime against humanity um there's big money in this too
01:12:43.280like it is an industry these people never get to come off the drugs whether they have to stay on
01:12:50.160the cross sex hormones just to have some kind of balance or whether um you know due to repeat
01:12:58.320infections uh they have to keep getting treated uh because of that they they never really get to
01:13:04.400come off the drugs so it's uh patients yeah they're permanent medical patients permanent medical
01:13:11.280patients and sterile you know and sterile uh shortened life expectancy um you know there was
01:13:20.000a study that came out of sweden in 2011 it was a long-term follow-up study of transsexual
01:13:25.840persons undergoing sex reassignment surgery cohort study in sweden and they followed people out to
01:13:31.440even 30 years after they uh they had transitioned and um it's it's really bleak it's really dark
01:13:42.080stuff once they get out to about 10 years post-transition right around seven or eight
01:13:46.400years the suicide rate starts to spike like go through the roof and at about the 10-year mark
01:13:52.320you see the mortality really just drops off a cliff like these people start dying
01:13:57.440at way higher rates um than the general population and and so they're essentially
01:14:03.360slowly murdering them it's coming from jeff where like where is this being fed to our children do
01:14:08.720you have any insight into that in terms of the gender ideology yeah like where are these ideas
01:14:15.120up it is school um and there is a marxist agenda i think that pervades our institutions right now
01:14:23.920You know, Aldous Tuxley in Brave New World, the kids had to engage in erotic play.
01:14:32.620They were forced to engage in erotic play in school.
01:14:34.660So it does seem to be something like a natural constituent of tyranny.
01:14:38.680But in terms of the ideology itself, things like, like I look at Bill C4,
01:14:45.660which is the one that says you must transition your kid as soon as they identify as trans.
01:14:49.980or at least if you refuse to transition your kid,
01:15:44.680under Theodora Darno and Max Horkheimer.
01:15:48.340They were very famous critical theorists, as in post-Marxist.
01:15:54.440Another famous critical theorist was Judith Butler, who is an American professor who first said that gender was performative and gender is a social construct, as they say.
01:16:06.420So this is part of a larger totalitarian worldview that is fundamentally Marxist, has captured our institutions, starting with the university, permeating its way outward, and it's gotten all the way down to little kids now.
01:16:26.640It's not just that there's bleed over from the university into the high school, but it's all the way down to little kids.
01:16:36.420which is terrible a five-year-old child a five-year-old child does not even want to know
01:16:42.720about sex doesn't have any inkling about sex there is absolutely zero reason why we should
01:16:47.940be talking to children that age um about sex period let alone trying to have them decide
01:16:56.360what gender they want to be you know it's it's um it's pretty alarming a little telling in
01:17:03.460alberta when danielle smith introduced the bill to protect that or to get teachers to quit with
01:17:07.560the indoctrination and the backlash she received over that you know are you flying over the target
01:17:12.520dania i believe she was very much so just because of the backlash she received by certain teachers
01:17:17.540not all teachers i want to make sure i go there because there's a lot of amazing teachers out
01:17:21.400there but you know who you are yeah and i think that she kind of split the difference a little
01:17:27.660too much there too um she said okay we're not going to give chemical castration drugs till kids
01:17:33.300until they're 16. I don't think we should be giving chemical castration drugs to kids
01:17:38.540at all. Yeah, this stuff should be banned. It's abuse. It's not medicine. It's all harm and no
01:17:48.880help. And in fact, we had a pretty helpful study come out. It was well-timed for our event here
01:17:55.060because it just came out on the 4th of April. And the claim that these so-called clinicians
01:18:00.120have been gaslighting parents myself myself included have been gaslighting parents with
01:18:04.920is you know would you rather have a living son or a dead daughter um is it has just been completely
01:18:11.640and utterly falsified by this study that came out of finland where they looked at psychiatric
01:18:20.360morbidity and they found that i don't like for example boys who first started attending gender
01:18:28.200clinics had about uh about 9.8 of them had other psychiatric conditions but post transition that
01:18:36.680number jumps to about 61 so they're six times worse off um after transitioning as they were
01:18:45.240before transitioning so this idea that they're actually like like destroying somebody's body
01:18:51.080improves their mental health um as if we needed to be told that that's a bad idea um you would
01:18:59.080have to be a doctor to believe something so stupid but now um we have it right from the
01:19:03.560doctors that's yeah this was always really bad for people do you think this is a crack
01:19:11.160on the nuclear family because that's something that i've always thought it's like really right
01:19:15.720since um they took god out of the schools um when you know our taxes got so high interest rates were
01:19:22.920so high that moms had to start going to work i mean and that's over the course of my lifetime
01:19:28.760i feel like i was very lucky because my mom got to stay home with us kids till i was in about grade
01:19:33.720five i think so i i think i'm luckier than most kids because their mom doesn't get to stay home
01:19:38.600at all but i mean i think this has been just an attack on the nuclear family um for for decades
01:19:44.360already and the weaker that your nuclear family is as i've always said you know strong people