Human Events Daily with Jack Posobiec - April 01, 2026


Breakingļ¼š Court Showdown on Birthright Citizenship For Illegals


Episode Stats


Length

47 minutes

Words per minute

162.12

Word count

7,701

Sentence count

399

Harmful content

Misogyny

2

sentences flagged

Toxicity

8

sentences flagged

Hate speech

35

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

Today, President Trump is literally headed to the Supreme Court where oral arguments will be held over his push to end birthright citizenship for children of illegal immigrants and temporary visitors to the U.S. by former Mexican-American immigrants.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 Hey guys, it's Jack. I wanted to let you know that we're starting a new push for subscriptions here on Human Events Daily.
00:00:09.260 So make sure that when you're listening to this podcast, you hit subscribe, you download it, and you share it with five of your friends.
00:00:16.640 Make sure they're all going and downloading as well, because we need to get the signal out as much as possible.
00:00:22.380 Look, we've done so much over the past couple of years since this show started, and we're only going to do so much more.
00:00:29.300 Let's get it.
00:00:33.760 This is what happens when the fourth turning meets fifth generation warfare.
00:00:42.880 A commentator, international social media sensation, and former Navy intelligence veteran.
00:00:49.620 This is Human Events with your host, Jack Posobiec.
00:00:52.660 Christ is king.
00:00:54.220 President Trump literally, physically headed to the Supreme Court
00:00:57.900 where oral arguments will be held over his push to end birthright citizenship
00:01:01.920 for children of illegal migrants and temporary visitors to the U.S.
00:01:06.440 You're going to go to the Supreme Court tomorrow and just sit there and listen.
00:01:09.640 Because I have listened to this argument for so long.
00:01:12.480 How does the citizenship clause respond specifically to Dred Scott?
00:01:17.920 Dred Scott, you know, imposed one of the worst injustices in the history of this court
00:01:23.080 and it led to the outbreak of the Civil War.
00:01:25.260 It's very clear in this court in all of its early cases
00:01:27.760 interpreting the 14th Amendment said
00:01:29.340 that one pervading purpose, the main object of the citizenship clause
00:01:33.740 is to overrule Dred Scott and establish the citizenship of the freed slaves.
00:01:37.800 If you look at the debates in the congressional record
00:01:40.100 and discussion surrounding the adoption of the citizenship clause,
00:01:43.680 what you see is a very clear understanding
00:01:46.060 that the newly freed slaves and their children have a...
00:01:50.080 ladies and gentlemen welcome on board today's edition of human events daily we're here live
00:01:56.720 real america's voice showdown at the supreme court today april 1st 2026 on the question
00:02:03.980 birthright citizenship for illegal aliens mike davis of the article three project joins us now
00:02:09.840 mike how are you i'm doing well jack thank you for having me so mike let us know from the start
00:02:16.120 what did you think of the arguments? How do you think the court's going to come down on this?
00:02:20.180 I'm seeing a lot of mixed opinion out there. I think President Trump's solicitor general,
00:02:25.920 John Sauer, did a phenomenal job today of making the compelling legal arguments. If the Supreme
00:02:34.620 Court justices follow the 14th Amendment, if they follow the plain text in the original public
00:02:42.660 meaning this is a very easy legal case. What I'm worried about, Jack, is politics seeps into these
00:02:53.100 cases. And I just hope that the Supreme Court justices showed up with their ropes today instead
00:03:00.860 of their capes. I hope they follow the law. The law is very clear. The 14th Amendment,
00:03:06.780 The Birthright Citizenship Clause of the 14th Amendment was enacted to overturn the Dred Scott decision, the post-Civil War Supreme Court decision that said that the freed slaves are not American citizens.
00:03:21.420 And so we enacted the 13th Amendment to outlaw slavery, the 14th Amendment to provide due process and equal protection to the freed slaves, and the 15th Amendment to provide voting rights to the freed male slaves.
00:03:35.600 That was extended to Black women with the 19th Amendment. 0.53
00:03:39.300 But as part of the 14th Amendment, we overturned the Dred Scott decision with the Birthright Citizenship Clause, and it gave birthright citizenship to the freed slaves.
00:03:50.100 Now, the language talks about all persons born in the United States subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, and that part is key.
00:04:00.380 You have to be both born in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction.
00:04:05.540 American Indians were not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, and so Congress had to pass birthright citizenship for American Indians by statute.
00:04:17.420 So you have to ask this dispositive question of these justices, those who auditioned as textualists and originalists to get their jobs.
00:04:27.140 If American Indians are not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States under the 14th Amendment, how the hell would illegal aliens be subject to the jurisdiction?
00:04:37.140 And the answer is they clearly are not. 0.98
00:04:39.720 Again, this is a very easy legal case.
00:04:44.200 Well, that's exactly right.
00:04:45.500 And everyone understands the history of this and the purpose of the Indian Naturalization Act, which came later, about 40, you know, 40, 50 years later, I believe, in 1924, that that gave the citizenship to the American Indians.
00:05:03.120 And obviously there were a series of wars that were fought with the American Indians, Custer's Last Stand, all of these things took place in the intervening years.
00:05:10.140 So the idea that this would apply to all of these extraneous groups, like some kind of giant umbrella, which is what the ACLU is trying to argue, it just doesn't hold any water whatsoever with the actual historical record, does it?
00:05:25.100 No, and this is crucial, Jack. Our most crucial sovereign power as we the people, the sovereign citizens of America, is controlling our border and controlling our populace, deciding who gets to come, who gets to go, and who gets the benefit of citizenship.
00:05:44.860 And we never agreed to give birthright citizenship to illegal aliens, not at our founding, not after the Civil War with the 14th Amendment and not any subsequent Congress since then.
00:05:57.880 Now, you see a Fox News poll that shows that birthright citizenship for illegal aliens is widely popular, has 67 percent support among Americans. 0.61
00:06:07.100 Okay, well, if that's the case, the Supreme Court should be more modest here and decide the 14th Amendment like the Supreme Court decided for American Indians, which it doesn't apply to illegal aliens, and let Congress decide, let we the people decide through our elected members of Congress, whether we want to grant birthright citizenship to illegal aliens, just like we did for American Indians.
00:06:33.560 Let's just let's just hope and pray that these six Republican appointed Supreme Court justices, those who claim they're textualist and originalist, have the modesty to do that.
00:06:47.000 Let's just hope that they wear robes instead of capes.
00:06:51.960 There's no question about it.
00:06:53.800 And it's it's something where you look at MAGA, you look at everything that we've done, you looked at everything we've come up for.
00:06:59.880 This has always been about these questions.
00:07:02.080 Mike, can you hang on for one more segment?
00:07:03.600 There's a couple more pieces I want to hit.
00:07:04.860 Maybe I'll hold you over for a little bit.
00:07:06.820 Yep, you got it.
00:07:08.520 All right, we're holding him over.
00:07:09.720 We're holding over Mike Davis, the elusive Mike Davis, here at Human Events Daily.
00:07:17.240 And in our way, and our golden age has just begun.
00:07:20.760 This is Human Events with Jack Posobo.
00:07:22.520 Now it's time for everyone to understand what America First truly means.
00:07:27.000 Welcome to the second American Revolution.
00:07:32.080 I'm Jack Selvig back live here, Human Events Daily, Real America's Voice.
00:07:39.220 We're on with Mike Davis at Article 3 Project.
00:07:40.760 We're talking about the Supreme Court showdown on birthright citizenship.
00:07:43.240 And Mike, I got to say, man, you mentioned there was this poll that came out about the children of illegal aliens and it's like 60% support.
00:07:51.420 So I just don't buy that.
00:07:52.380 I just don't buy that.
00:07:53.400 How do you have a country where Donald Trump, who runs on the policy of mass deportations, and he says it over and over and over, wins the popular vote, wins seven out of seven of the swing states.
00:08:04.560 And now people are trying to tell us that, oh, birthright citizenship for illegal alien children is popular.
00:08:11.700 Who did you poll? 0.93
00:08:12.800 Illegal aliens? 1.00
00:08:14.240 Like, I don't buy that. 1.00
00:08:15.820 I don't buy that for a second.
00:08:17.100 I don't think that's true.
00:08:18.100 I think these things are wildly unpopular.
00:08:20.060 I think illegal immigration is wildly unpopular in the United States.
00:08:23.400 I think that birth tourism is wildly unpopular in the United States, not to mention a gross violation of our sovereignty.
00:08:29.640 As you say, it's a gross violation of our country.
00:08:32.640 It's a violation of the sovereign powers of the executive here, the president of the United States.
00:08:38.460 All of these things are violations of our country, violations of the rights of our people and the violations of the rights, obviously, of our due elected president of the United States.
00:08:46.280 But but, Mike, that being said, these are complex, thorny issues.
00:08:51.680 The justices in some of these cases involving immigration, we know they have to say the least, they've they've gotten a little wobbly.
00:08:59.480 Do you think this is an uphill battle for the administration with not just this court, but with the courts in general?
00:09:07.340 I worry this is a seven to two case, and I worry that the only two justices who will actually have the courage to follow the law here are Justice Clarence Thomas and Justice Sam Alito.
00:09:20.140 I worry that the chief justice and the three Trump justices will join the three leftists who will always vote against President Trump.
00:09:30.100 But again, the law is so crystal clear here that we, the people, the sovereign citizens of America, get to decide who comes, who goes, get to decide who our fellow citizens are.
00:09:42.480 And we didn't give that away.
00:09:43.740 We certainly did not give that away after the Civil War, the 14th Amendment, the birthright citizenship clause was to correct an egregious wrong with the Dred Scott Supreme Court decision that held that the freed slaves are not citizens.
00:09:58.400 We fixed that with the 14th Amendment.
00:10:01.300 There have been there is a Supreme Court case that has extended that to lawful and permanent residents of the United States, the Chinese exclusion case. 0.59
00:10:10.460 But there is no way in hell that the proponents of the 14th Amendment or the public at the time ever agreed to give birthright citizenship to illegal aliens, to give birthright citizenship to 1.5 Chinese birth tourists who are coming to America, giving birth in America, going back to China, where they never step foot in America again.
00:10:35.700 they're American citizens, and then in 18 years, they get a vote, they get a mail-in their vote 0.54
00:10:40.720 from Beijing, there's no way in hell we agree to that. And if the Supreme Court actually holds
00:10:47.480 that the 14th Amendment gives birthright citizenship to Chinese birth tourists,
00:10:53.400 the Supreme Court is going to torch its legitimacy with the American people. 0.99
00:10:59.900 I think that's exactly right. And I think the legitimacy is going to absolutely come in
00:11:04.140 question. And look, if that's the case, if that is the case and they come out saying that we need
00:11:10.520 a Supreme Court or excuse me, a constitutional amendment to overturn birthright citizenship
00:11:15.800 and to hammer this out. And, you know, you could even just call it a revision of the 14th
00:11:23.420 amendment. Then by all means, by all means, we can push it. The president can push it. This would
00:11:29.140 be a popular effort. This would absolutely get passed. I think it would definitely get passed.
00:11:33.040 It's something, by the way, that could even become an entirely new way to change the midterm elections this year if we put that on the ballot and we say we are fighting for the citizens of the United States of America and to end this scourge once and for all a constitutional amendment.
00:11:51.680 And by the way, not just on birthright citizenship, on all immigration laws.
00:11:56.840 Mike Davis, I know you've got to run.
00:11:58.240 Where can people follow you, brother?
00:11:59.980 Thank you, Jack.
00:12:00.660 article three project.org article number three projects.org all right mike davis give him a
00:12:07.600 follow folks you know this guy is going to give it to you straight when he tells you
00:12:11.840 that this is an uphill battle and warns that we we could be facing a seven to two decision
00:12:18.600 upholding birthright citizenship folks i gotta tell you america is entering its 250th year
00:12:26.480 and the direction of this country is being decided right now in our culture and our economy
00:12:30.860 and who we choose to support matters more than ever most wireless companies don't care who you
00:12:35.300 are what you believe they just want your money patriot mobile is different for more than 12
00:12:40.640 years they have stood with americans who does who believe that freedom is worth defending
00:12:45.140 funding the conservative christian movement when others stayed silent here's the deal you don't
00:12:50.400 have to give up quality or service when you switch to patriot mobile they deliver premium priority
00:12:54.960 access on all three major U.S. networks, so you'll get the same or better coverage than you have
00:13:01.020 today. Think switching is a hassle? It isn't. Keep your number, keep your phone, or upgrade.
00:13:05.860 Their 100% U.S.-based support team can activate you in minutes. Are you still paying off a device?
00:13:11.700 Patriot Mobile even offers you a contract buyout. This is a defining year. We have to work together
00:13:18.020 to save our country. Go to patriotmobile.com slash POSO or call 972-PATRIOT for a free month
00:13:24.820 of service. That's PatriotMobile.com slash POSO or 972 Patriot. Make the switch today. All right,
00:13:32.260 folks, we are continuing our coverage of this situation, the showdown at the Supreme Court.
00:13:40.120 And by the way, let me just let me just pull this out for a second. Let me just walk people
00:13:43.340 through this. Like, let's let's say, you know, in the scenario, in the scenario where we get
00:13:47.580 a 72 decision against or even a five, whatever it is, whatever it is, if birthright citizenship
00:13:53.640 upheld. Imagine this. Imagine the political ramifications of making the 2026 midterm election
00:14:00.640 and the 2028 election all about a constitutional amendment on birthright citizenship and on
00:14:09.460 immigration in general, an illegal alien amendment. It's time for an illegal alien amendment to the
00:14:17.620 U.S. Constitution where we go through all of these things. We go through chapter and verse, 0.88
00:14:22.660 all of the issues that are being caused in our nation right now. So John Roberts, and you saw
00:14:27.280 that, that line that he said earlier, where he said, oh, it's a, you know, it's a, it's a new
00:14:32.260 world, but it's an old constitution. That's the point, right? The 14th amendment was decided in
00:14:38.260 the wake of the civil war. And as such was decided in the world of the 1860s. It is a world that is
00:14:47.440 fundamentally different in so many ways immediate uh flights immediate travel that's able birthright
00:14:55.660 citizenship which was unthinkable in those times is available now so what is the proper remedy
00:15:00.800 an amendment to the united states constitution i right here on human events daily
00:15:07.520 i'm proposing a constitutional amendment on illegal immigration joshua lysac
00:15:14.700 author a new york multiple new york times best-selling author joins us now also the
00:15:20.000 co-author of unhumans joins us joshua you've been listening to this case you've been listening to
00:15:24.880 the debate what what do you think what do you think by the way right there of my scheme of
00:15:29.040 saying you know what let's put this up to the american people let's push for a constitutional
00:15:35.080 amendment on illegal immigration do you think that would be popular do you think that would
00:15:41.040 reframe the midterm elections and the next series of elections? And really, are politics in this
00:15:46.480 country writ large? Yes, I think so. One of the refrains of my and many other Trump supporters
00:15:54.000 positions has been, with a simple rhyme, stay on track, they all go back. All economic malaise and
00:16:01.320 other socio-political disruptions we have for our current generations, they all go back to 1.00
00:16:07.600 immigration. It's a simple matter of supply and demand. And what infuriates most of the 0.89
00:16:15.360 American patriots I'm talking to is the sorts of advocates for unfettered immigration, like 0.62
00:16:21.260 Cecilia Wang, who is advocating for birthright citizenship today at the United States Supreme 0.81
00:16:26.500 Court. She herself was born to immigrants in Oregon. She is ethnically Han Chinese. Her parents
00:16:33.140 are from Taiwan. She was born in Oregon. Now she gets to be a U.S. citizen. She's been saying to
00:16:38.160 all the protesters and supporters of hers outside the Supreme Court, you are all Americans, she's
00:16:43.500 saying. You're all American citizens. So what's happening and what has happened for decades now
00:16:47.980 is what it means to be American, the adjective, no longer equates to what it means to be an
00:16:57.500 American as a citizen. And the great crisis of our age and of our culture going forwards,
00:17:04.180 and if we don't win, we don't have a country. The great crisis is to recouple citizenship
00:17:10.360 and heritage American identity. And that makes a lot of people uncomfortable, but that is the
00:17:16.960 reality that we face. Otherwise, if anyone can be an American, then everyone is an American.
00:17:23.460 We have 8 billion potential Americans in the world. How does that make any sense?
00:17:26.560 Well, I love, I love that. Yeah. I was just going to say, so, so, so this transforms everyone. And
00:17:31.460 obviously we've had this conversation before, but this, this is the rhetoric and this is the
00:17:35.940 ideology and the worldview that everyone outside the, outside the country, outside the confines
00:17:40.980 of the United States is a sort of pre-American. They're just waiting to become an American.
00:17:45.920 They're the, as soon as they cross the magical threshold of America's borders, America on,
00:17:52.180 magic dirt transforms them into America. Did you hear Ketanji Brown Jackson saying this as well,
00:17:57.640 that, well, even if the parents don't have allegiance to the United States, then wouldn't
00:18:02.780 the child potentially have allegiance to the United States? I mean,
00:18:06.380 so it was not even born yet. By the way, I love the fact that, and I'm just going to say it,
00:18:11.640 kind of interesting how all of a sudden when it's an immigrant's baby or an illegal alien's baby,
00:18:17.720 um when they are pregnant women then suddenly they are children uh but in the context of abortion 0.91
00:18:23.680 you never ever hear them argue this because they're not white jack 0.80
00:18:28.980 exactly no exactly uh joshua we are coming up on um a little break here i want to hold you over 0.53
00:18:37.320 because there's so much to dig into here and you're right that these are fundamentally questions
00:18:42.000 of identity? What does it mean to be an American? What does it mean to have allegiance? And you
00:18:48.100 better believe that in the 1860s, right after a massive war was fought between the northern and
00:18:53.080 southern states, the questions of allegiance were first and foremost and primary on Americans'
00:18:59.480 minds. Right back, Jack Posobiec, Human Events Daily.
00:19:03.420 Hey, you know, they talk about influences. These are influences. And they're friends of mine.
00:19:09.380 Jack Prasovic. Where's Jack?
00:19:12.640 Jack. He's got a great job.
00:19:16.060 Page 2890 of the congressional record from 1866.
00:19:18.960 Senator Cowan gives this virulently racist statement where he says that.
00:19:22.600 And what does he say right at the beginning of that sort of offensive speech?
00:19:25.260 He says, we can't have children of gypsies, children of Chinese immigrants.
00:19:28.880 We can't have them become citizens.
00:19:30.180 And he says, quote, have they any more rights than a sojourner in the United States?
00:19:34.580 So he's trying to persuade the Republicans to his view by appealing to a common understanding that sojourners do not have children who become citizens.
00:19:43.720 So there's powerful evidence there that everybody understood this to, you know, not sweep in the temporary sojourner.
00:19:52.480 All right, Jack, so we're back live here at Human Events Daily, Real America's Voice.
00:19:56.760 We're on with Joshua Lisek.
00:19:58.060 And Joshua, you know, you heard the Solicitor General there, Solicitor General Sauer there.
00:20:03.060 And what I want people to do, and I think this is important, is that we're we have an issue of frames here.
00:20:12.520 And you saw Ketanji Brown Jackson doing this over and over saying, oh, well, if I go to Japan and I steal a wallet, I'm subject to the jurisdiction of the Japanese laws.
00:20:23.360 It was just ridiculous statements or, you know, even Robert saying, oh, well, it's a new world, but it's an old constitution.
00:20:30.280 Is it just just let's let's let's let's actually understand that because the frame of the framers of this law, because we do have to look at the frame, we're having an argument about frame.
00:20:41.240 This isn't actually a an argument about words.
00:20:45.520 It's an argument about frame, because if you adopt them frame of today, then, of course, you apply all of the the situations of today, the exclusions of today.
00:20:54.140 But if you adopt the frame, we're just trying to understand the intent.
00:20:56.320 We're just trying to understand the intent behind the 14th Amendment.
00:20:58.340 What was America in 1866? And there's this question of the American Indians. Well, guess what? We didn't even have a full United States in 1866. There was a series of wars that were fought between America, the American army and American Indians during this time.
00:21:18.820 So their status as citizens. Right. Didn't duly come up until the 1920s. Why? Because it was a different world. You had the Russian Empire was still on the American continent. The Spanish Empire was in Cuba. The British Empire was sort of lurking about and, you know, was was up in Canada.
00:21:41.160 Still, the Spanish-American War wouldn't come for another 30 years.
00:21:44.520 So the idea that we could just, again, apply every single little standard of the current situation to something like immigration, which by its very nature is something that a nation can dial up and dial down at any time, is something that we need to take into consideration.
00:22:04.720 And again, I'm just talking about the definitional, the definitional concepts behind these words like jurisdiction, these words like allegiance, what all of these things meant to the framers at the time.
00:22:20.740 So there was a situation where Justice Gorsuch asked a question about, well, would this apply to, you know, American Indians?
00:22:27.040 Well, it's like, well, at the time, American Indians were in territories.
00:22:30.700 They weren't even in states. 0.95
00:22:32.100 So, you know, again, people have to put themselves back into the world of this.
00:22:37.500 This is I mean, you had the Wild West still going on in 1866.
00:22:42.200 This was a fundamentally different country than we are now.
00:22:46.840 And those were the words that they were using.
00:22:49.620 So, Joshua, this is what I want to try to split apart.
00:22:52.020 I know you're so good at this.
00:22:53.320 There is a difference between us saying that legal standards are eternal,
00:22:57.920 but also to understand the frame of the words, that does actually change, doesn't it?
00:23:06.120 It does, yes. And this is where original intent becomes key, but also this opposing position,
00:23:12.960 which is a sort of living document business. It seems like the birthright citizenship advocates
00:23:19.040 are advocating for the most, let's say, merciful and inclusive possible interpretation of the 14th
00:23:25.780 Amendment, whereas when they go to the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed Second
00:23:31.480 Amendment, how many infringing laws federally, state, and local are there upon firearm ownership?
00:23:37.020 Oh, absolutely. And then the conservative, the reasonable Republican, the normal average American
00:23:41.600 person says to themselves, well, why the double standards? That's not right. The double standards
00:23:47.740 are the point. Consider the motive of those who advocate for birthright citizenship.
00:23:54.560 The context of this is to be an American citizen is to be granted immense privileges, such
00:24:02.460 as the privileges of welfare and other federally available, let's say, services and experiences
00:24:08.980 that are available to citizens.
00:24:10.800 Well, if you look at contribution, net taxpayer contribution from various groups, those who
00:24:18.100 are native born, those who are naturalized, and then various legal and illegal immigrants
00:24:22.840 from different countries, you see an interesting sort of a picture emerge from the bar graphs and
00:24:29.220 charts here where the heritage American haze into the system, whereas the newcomer, the illegal
00:24:37.960 immigrant in many cases and from many different countries, many different ethnic groups are net
00:24:42.940 takers. They're here for the gimmies and stimmies. That's why they want the birthright citizenship. 1.00
00:24:48.200 It's free money. 0.93
00:24:52.840 That's exactly right. And and Joshua, and I'm just going to say this, by the way, because I think it's very obvious. But, you know, when you have the ACLU lawyer and she's coming up out there saying, oh, you're all Americans, you're all Americans, too.
00:25:06.180 She knows what she's doing. She knows exactly what she's doing. She knows what the implications are of what she's pushing.
00:25:12.060 She knows what she is advocating for, a mass restructuring of the United States. 0.94
00:25:18.980 She knows the implications of her arguments, and she does want all non-citizens to be automatically granted citizenship in the most open and the most expansive way possible 0.94
00:25:31.900 because she understands what it would do to the United States in terms of destabilizing 0.96
00:25:38.900 our system of laws, our system of government, in furtherance of what you just said, of allowing 0.99
00:25:45.080 these masses of millions of people to come to the United States and automatically be granted
00:25:49.640 citizenship and gimmies under our laws. Yes, it's often said that, oh, the Great
00:25:56.960 replacement is just a conspiracy theory and then for years you have had let's say democratic
00:26:04.800 aligned influencers politicians even their allies and proxies amongst the ngo community
00:26:11.040 they will say things like in one breath obviously that's a conspiracy theory amongst racists
00:26:16.860 followed by and it's good that it's happening and we're spending billions of taxpayer dollars to
00:26:22.700 make sure it happens even more. Ultimately, the vision is to make the United States a permanent
00:26:29.180 one-party state. In much the same way that California has had unrestricted warfare engaged
00:26:34.980 against it by the Chinese Communist Party, that same objective is meant for the United States of
00:26:40.700 America. Precisely right. Jack Posobiec, Joshua Lysak, right back. 1.00
00:26:52.700 Where is Jack? Where is he? Jack, I want to see you. Great job, Jack. Thank you. What a job you do.
00:27:03.620 You know, we have an incredible thing. We're always talking about the fake news and the bad,
00:27:07.300 but we have guys, and these are the guys who should be getting Pulisic.
00:27:13.440 All right, Jack Posobiec here. We are back. Human Events Daily, Real America's Voice. Folks,
00:27:18.100 let me be blunt. Before the crashes of 1999 and 2008, a rare market signal appeared. Most people
00:27:24.600 ignored it. The smart money didn't. Gold and stocks were rising at the same time, and that is
00:27:29.120 not normal. Stocks were supposed to rise when confidence is strong. Gold rises when confidence
00:27:34.200 starts to break. They move in opposite directions until something underneath the system is off.
00:27:39.280 Well, right now, they're both breaking records again. That has only happened twice before major
00:27:44.580 market repricing events. Does that mean it crashes tomorrow? No. But it does mean that risk may be
00:27:50.280 dangerously mispriced. Gold doesn't surge because it's popular. It moves when currency confidence
00:27:56.400 weakens, debt explodes, and central banks prepare quietly behind the scenes. Here's what should get
00:28:01.440 your attention. Banks are buying gold at record levels right now. They're not guessing. Gold
00:28:06.900 doesn't depend on earnings. It doesn't depend on credit markets. It doesn't depend on political
00:28:10.340 promises stocks do you have savings or retirement account you don't get a do-over this is about
00:28:16.020 protection not speculation so give them a call 844-577-POSO or visit protectwithposo.com
00:28:23.460 that's 844-577-P-O excuse me 844-577-7676 or protectwithposo that's P-O-S-O.com learn how a
00:28:34.980 Gold IRA can help shield what you've worked decades to build.
00:28:38.220 Call 844-577-7676.
00:28:42.820 And folks, I want to remind everyone that Real America's Voice is, of course, going to be covering the Artemis II launch tonight in just about four hours' time, 624 p.m. Eastern Standard.
00:28:56.140 This is going to be just an incredible mission, and hats off to the brave American astronauts that are going to be on this mission.
00:29:06.800 Another programming note, Turning Point USA will be streamed live tomorrow night.
00:29:13.280 A huge event at George Washington University featuring Erica Kirk, the CEO of Turning Point USA, Caroline Levitt, the press secretary of the White House, and yours truly, Jack Posobiec.
00:29:28.660 And I will endeavor to hold my head straight as opposed to the corkscrew way that they have it on the on the shot here.
00:29:35.720 But, yes, we'll all be there tomorrow at George Washington University, so make sure you tune in to Real America's Voice, where we're going to be covering that live tomorrow night.
00:29:46.460 And then, of course, tonight, the president speaks, 9 p.m.
00:29:49.120 I broke last night on a Fox hit that I'm hearing talk of a grand deal that the president of the United States may be presenting tonight to the American people.
00:30:02.600 talk about the success of our military and political objectives in iran and then a grand
00:30:07.480 deal and connecting the dots all the way back to why this was started this military operation
00:30:14.360 and bringing us to today in alignment with our regional partners the arab nations working of
00:30:20.040 course with pakistan and now china with their five-point policies we're going to get into
00:30:24.120 all of that and real america's voice of course we'll be covering that live as well joshua lisek
00:30:28.200 we were talking about this, the destabilization, right? The ACLU understands the destabilization
00:30:34.180 to the United States. And this is not the ACLU of the past, which supported everyone's
00:30:39.140 free speech rights. No, they were. This is the ACLU of today, which is simply another vehicle
00:30:45.500 of the massive far left. And this is this, of course, was our thesis in Unhumans that they
00:30:52.320 understand the destabilization effect of their policies. Mondami understands that what he's
00:30:57.860 doing is going to destroy New York. Karen Bass understands that what she's doing is going to
00:31:02.560 destroy the Los Angeles community, the Los Angeles city. The destruction is the point, isn't it?
00:31:09.960 Yes, that's correct. What we consistently see from those conversations and those crises,
00:31:14.120 and also from today with Birthright Citizenship, I noticed that when we make an argument of,
00:31:20.720 let's say, against Birthright Citizenship, and I think a fellow named At Real Theo Wold did a
00:31:27.740 good example of this. He said, it's a simple constitutional question. Does the 14th Amendment
00:31:31.920 require that America accept children born to illegal foreigners as citizens? The answer is 1.00
00:31:37.580 quite obviously no. If the right of American citizenship belongs to the world, then America 0.52
00:31:42.400 is no longer a sovereign country. That's the point. The various arguments we make against
00:31:49.680 birthright citizenship turned inside out become their arguments for it. When we say, no, that 0.98
00:31:56.000 takes from American taxpayers whose families have been here for centuries? Yes, that's the point.
00:32:01.920 But that grants effectively more rights to non-taxpayers, non-net taxpayers, at the expense
00:32:07.800 of the, yes, that's the point. But that grants a greater advantage to the Democratic candidates
00:32:13.800 and areas and the census and representation. And yes, that's the point. So are arguments against
00:32:19.900 it are their arguments for it. All left-wing vitriol in the form of activism like the ACLU,
00:32:27.500 which is effectively a proxy for the most progressive, let's so-called, interest of the
00:32:32.760 Democratic Party, our arguments, or rather their arguments in favor of hurting us are our arguments
00:32:42.540 against being hurt. It's completely different, or rather, shall we say, at-odds viewpoints,
00:32:49.480 And I think the more this goes on, it becomes very clear that those of us on the right who have a
00:32:56.680 level playing feel, let's keep everything fair, rules-based mentality are at a disadvantage
00:33:03.580 because they're not playing the same game as us. They're not following the rules. They will get
00:33:08.280 whatever they want. It's like, oh, you didn't decide what I wanted? Well, I'm going to, you
00:33:13.800 know uh destroy you and that's that's that's that's the point and it's like what are you
00:33:19.900 going to do about that you don't you don't have a country if that's if that's the case so yeah
00:33:24.360 we'll see if that is that is the point and and i want to play we we've got a clip here that's
00:33:31.140 actually showing exactly what you're talking about and i think it aligns the point that guys
00:33:35.960 let's play sat nine not subject to any foreign power is pretty straightforward so let me give
00:33:43.240 you these examples um a boy is born here to an iranian father who has entered the country
00:33:50.940 illegally that boy is automatically an iranian national at birth and he has a duty to provide
00:33:58.300 military service to the iranian government is he not subject to any foreign power
00:34:05.220 and there you go right there so you've got justice alito talking about wait a minute
00:34:12.600 what about the children of foreigners that are subject to foreign military service what about
00:34:21.340 the children of oh i don't know spies to the united states of america would they be automatically
00:34:27.220 granted citizenship and of course the aco you replied yes yes they do even if they owe the
00:34:33.840 reason their jurisdiction they owe their allegiance go ahead go ahead oh yeah well of course they're
00:34:39.820 going to say that, because if you understand that this is America, it's team America versus team
00:34:46.620 anti-America, everyone's motives begin to make sense. And you can now, with accuracy, predict
00:34:53.480 what's going to happen next, who's going to say what. There's lots of word persuasion happening
00:34:59.580 and word thinking, and did the founders mean this, and then the Indians this, and foreign dignitaries
00:35:04.500 and diplomats that. But ultimately, it comes down to, is the United States a sovereign country?
00:35:09.820 Is it an economic zone for sending people to get their gimmies and stimmies from your own ethnicity, race, or tribe at the expense of the Heritage American taxpayer, who is a net positive taxpayer, and the various groups that are having advocates on their behalf, like the ACLU, for example, coming in, they're net takers.
00:35:33.320 they're not givers, largely speaking, but they're takers from the system. It's simply benefiting
00:35:39.340 one group at the expense of the other, and that other is the United States. So magic dirt
00:35:44.280 hypothesis, it sounds like that really is what is being decided here. Do you become American?
00:35:51.560 Obviously, that's ridiculous. You don't immediately adopt the culture, the norms, the values of a 0.94
00:35:56.980 place. But our position is that the United States of America is not an economic zone.
00:36:03.320 it's our home. And this is exactly what Alito has done. He's exposed them. He's actually exposed
00:36:12.460 them with this argument by saying that you would allow potentially foreign military or military
00:36:19.240 eligible citizens, military eligible children to gain automatic American citizenship. This is a
00:36:27.040 farce is a joke. This is ridiculous. And obviously something that we should all take note of 0.99
00:36:33.740 specifically when we're talking about foreign allegiance, we should not be glib about these
00:36:38.000 things. And again, of course, you know, you you'll hear the same thing from the far left when they
00:36:42.760 when they, you know, say they're oh, we have to be so worried about foreign disinformation
00:36:46.800 running our elections. And it's sort of the old the old joke that, you know, we have to pass voter
00:36:51.620 ID so that Putin can't steal the elections again. Well, maybe we have to strike down birthright
00:36:56.600 tourism so Putin can't steal American citizenship. Joshua, I know you got to run. Tell us where to go
00:37:04.500 and follow you and everything you're working on. Sure thing. Yes, I've got quite a few books
00:37:09.280 coming out this year. I turned in literally number four manuscript of number five. So far
00:37:13.360 this year, me and my various antics are over at Joshua Lysak on X. Last thing that I want to point
00:37:19.440 out is I believe the ultimate goal of the Birthright Citizenship promoters is to have a third world
00:37:25.880 president as president of the United States via birthright citizenship and his parents were illegal
00:37:30.960 aliens. Wow. No, that's exactly right. Joshua Lysak, take that to the bank. I completely agree
00:37:37.540 with that prediction and I would put money on it. Jack Posobiec, right back, Human Events Daily.
00:37:45.380 Call this the Jack Posobiec Appreciation Hour. I can say confidently, I believe, I think Josh
00:37:50.460 Shapiro would be the vice presidential nominee if it wasn't for Jack Posobiec. And that is,
00:37:54.280 And I was thinking, you know, I'mā€”I, U.S. citizen, am visiting Japan. 0.93
00:38:03.900 And what it means is that, you know, if I steal someone's wallet in Japan, the Japanese
00:38:11.860 authorities can arrest me and prosecute me.
00:38:15.980 It's allegiance meaning, can they control you as a matter of law?
00:38:20.840 I can also rely on them if my wallet is stolen to, you know, under Japanese law, go and prosecute
00:38:27.720 the person who has stolen it.
00:38:29.760 So there's this relationship based on, even though I'm a temporary traveler, I'm just
00:38:34.880 on vacation in Japan, I'm still locally owing allegiance in that sense.
00:38:42.560 Is that the right way to think about it?
00:38:44.620 And if so, doesn't that explain why both temporary residents and undocumented people would have that kind of, quote, unquote, allegiance just by virtue of being in the United States?
00:39:01.340 Oh, oh, my gosh. 0.99
00:39:09.460 No, I get she triggers my sinuses.
00:39:12.460 she just she triggers my and like the pollen count is high this year but she's triggering my sign 1.00
00:39:16.980 like i just i can't i can't it's it's the stupidity it is the sheer stupidity of an auto pen 1.00
00:39:22.960 justice and that's what she is don't do not forget the justice ketanji brown jackson was 1.00
00:39:29.320 put there chosen and that the commission was signed by a person who lacked mental faculties
00:39:36.920 remember go back and read what came out of the her report go back and read everything came out
00:39:42.000 about joe biden that he had no idea what was going on he didn't know what day of the week it was
00:39:46.240 don't sit there and tell me that joe biden understood what he was signing in terms of the
00:39:51.000 pardons and what he was signing in terms of her supreme court nomination selection and commission
00:39:57.020 all right i i don't think i'm just gonna say it i don't think that she was appropriately chosen
00:40:02.840 i don't think that she was appropriately submitted and i don't believe that she was
00:40:06.180 appropriately commissioned by joe biden she was commissioned by an auto pen and that is not
00:40:11.380 correct and this is what happens when you have an auto pen justice you you you get someone who's
00:40:16.900 up there she's saying she is saying that if you go somewhere on vacation that you now have
00:40:22.280 allegiance to that place temporary allegiance temporary allegiance temporarily it's it's it 0.99
00:40:29.360 is a concept that is so incredibly and profoundly stupid that if you allow yourself to entertain it 0.99
00:40:36.220 for even a moment it will cause you physical mental and cerebral and psychic pain on a 1.00
00:40:40.880 spiritual a spiritual level and it's something that that like when i consider it to even consider
00:40:47.720 it for a brief period of time it's you just have to understand she doesn't get what she's talking
00:40:52.880 about she doesn't understand what these words mean she doesn't understand the concepts she
00:40:56.740 only understands what her side wants she only understands what the quote-unquote good people
00:41:02.860 on the left because they're not you know the way she looks at is right we're not on the left or on
00:41:09.860 the right, there are the good people and the bad people. There are the progressive people
00:41:14.800 and the repressive people. And the repressive people are the people who want to take us
00:41:19.960 back. That's why Joy Reid says that all the time. They want to take us back, whatever
00:41:24.800 that means. And to progress means to move forward. And the arc of history bends towards
00:41:34.540 justice. Again, whatever that means. So in her mind, right, we always need to be opening things
00:41:42.500 up, quote unquote, opening things up. So citizenship always needs to be open. Government
00:41:46.580 programs always need to be open. Justices can do whatever they want. Remember, keep in mind,
00:41:51.560 this is Kataji Brown Jackson, who last year was making an argument that was so ridiculous that
00:41:57.720 every single justice signed on to and this was in the universal injunction ruling the opinion
00:42:04.880 they all signed on to an opinion that had a clause in it talking about how poorly informed she was
00:42:12.320 on what exactly the justices do and that she just simply didn't understand the question didn't
00:42:19.040 understand the debate and the debate was on whether or not there should be limits on judicial
00:42:23.360 power obviously there are and there always have been for america's entire 250 year history of
00:42:29.300 course they have but she just acts like she acts like they haven't she acts like that's not a thing
00:42:34.280 or at least she did in the uh the injunction ruling and that was uh trump v casa so again
00:42:39.840 this is this is what you get this is what you get when you let an auto pen have you have you sit
00:42:45.220 there and pop your you know pop yourself up on the supreme court and continue these are lifetime
00:42:52.740 appointments, by the way. So that being said, I don't know, perhaps, perhaps she'll resign,
00:42:56.740 perhaps she'll resign for some reason. You know, these, these are the problems. These are the
00:43:03.220 problems that arise with so much of this. These are the problems that we get into. And it's like,
00:43:11.360 it's like getting your wallet stolen. I want to go back to what I was saying before. So people,
00:43:16.000 look, I get that in DC right now, and you know, people are texting me and people are,
00:43:20.300 kind of going around and there's these questions, you know, the Supreme Court feels skeptical,
00:43:25.640 feels like this might not be a W, but you know what? It is a W in a sense that it is a W for
00:43:30.700 the country that we're finally having this conversation at all, that we're finally in a
00:43:34.840 place as a country where we are deciding as a people, as a nation, as a heritage, do we want
00:43:44.440 to control who is in this country or not. I argue that we do, and I argue that we should.
00:43:51.320 And I would argue that these aren't, and think about what we're talking about, right? These are
00:43:54.920 nine people, nine judges, unelected, sitting on a Supreme Court who get to make this decision.
00:44:01.860 Should they be allowed to make this decision unilaterally? I don't think so. And I don't
00:44:06.960 think the American people think so either. And so if this mechanism of a Supreme Court case
00:44:13.520 doesn't get us the relief that we need from illegal immigration, from illegal aliens 0.81
00:44:19.220 invading our land and robbing us of our sustenance, and in many cases, robbing us of our people, 0.95
00:44:27.300 robbing us of the good of their lives, as well as the remit, as well as the treasure
00:44:34.220 that we have built, the economic good, then guess what? I'm all for it. An illegal immigration
00:44:40.960 constitutional amendment. So in the illegal immigration amendment, we are going to have
00:44:46.000 provisions on all of these things, every single piece of it. We're going to have revisions on
00:44:50.580 all of it. We are going to go through everything, everything that needs to be hashed out. And we'll
00:44:56.080 go get, we'll go get the guys at the Claremont Institute to put this all together. We'll have
00:45:00.340 them figure it out. They'll be able to hash it down. We'll get the, we'll get the dudes from
00:45:04.520 border Hawk to talk about some of the direct issues. And we will figure this out because
00:45:09.260 guess what? You know, they're right. You know, John Roberts, when he says, oh, well, it's an
00:45:13.200 old constitution. It's the, you know what though? The 14th amendment was not part of the original
00:45:16.880 constitution. As a matter of fact, John Obamacare is not a tax John. No, I still haven't forgiven
00:45:23.500 you for that. And I probably never will because these people don't actually care about the law.
00:45:28.560 They care about looking good in the newspapers. They care about looking good in the, uh, in the,
00:45:36.040 the intellectual, intellectual, you know, intelligentsia of Washington, D.C.
00:45:42.000 And look, I'll even say it, folks. I'll even say it. I agree with Mark Levin on this.
00:45:47.340 I agree with Mark Levin, who's someone I've listened to his radio show for years, by the way.
00:45:52.340 And he's 100 percent right when it comes to the hubris of the Supreme Court.
00:45:57.740 Mark Levin, 100 percent correct when it came to the Supreme Court.
00:46:02.940 I know that he and I have been at odds lately over certain things, and he certainly had some words there.
00:46:09.220 But you know what? I completely agree with him on that.
00:46:12.340 And I think that we as a country do need to get to a point where whether it's by constitutional amendment or by executive action,
00:46:19.100 we need to understand that we have three branches of government and they are meant to be separate and co-equal.
00:46:25.640 You cannot have one branch that completely usurps the power of another.
00:46:29.780 You can't have the Supreme Court coming in and making these decisions over who is allowed in and out of this country at any given time and doing so in contraviction, doing so to impeach and to overturn the will of the people of this country.
00:46:50.100 and the will of the people of the United States of America was electing Donald J. Trump to conduct
00:46:56.040 mass deportations of the people who are not supposed to be in this country. And if that
00:47:01.980 if that requires an illegal immigration amendment, then I say, let's do it. And I say I'm for it. 1.00
00:47:06.880 And I say the American people will be for it. And we will make the midterms of all about illegal
00:47:11.300 immigration. And we will do so. We will do so in contravention of the United States Supreme Court 0.94
00:47:17.060 and anyone else who dares to stand against us.
00:47:22.600 Thoughts and prayers to the crew of the Artemis.
00:47:25.680 We're taking off soon.
00:47:27.200 Ladies and gentlemen, as always,
00:47:28.820 you have my permission to lay short.