00:01:29.340that one pervading purpose, the main object of the citizenship clause
00:01:33.740is to overrule Dred Scott and establish the citizenship of the freed slaves.
00:01:37.800If you look at the debates in the congressional record
00:01:40.100and discussion surrounding the adoption of the citizenship clause,
00:01:43.680what you see is a very clear understanding
00:01:46.060that the newly freed slaves and their children have a...
00:01:50.080ladies and gentlemen welcome on board today's edition of human events daily we're here live
00:01:56.720real america's voice showdown at the supreme court today april 1st 2026 on the question
00:02:03.980birthright citizenship for illegal aliens mike davis of the article three project joins us now
00:02:09.840mike how are you i'm doing well jack thank you for having me so mike let us know from the start
00:02:16.120what did you think of the arguments? How do you think the court's going to come down on this?
00:02:20.180I'm seeing a lot of mixed opinion out there. I think President Trump's solicitor general,
00:02:25.920John Sauer, did a phenomenal job today of making the compelling legal arguments. If the Supreme
00:02:34.620Court justices follow the 14th Amendment, if they follow the plain text in the original public
00:02:42.660meaning this is a very easy legal case. What I'm worried about, Jack, is politics seeps into these
00:02:53.100cases. And I just hope that the Supreme Court justices showed up with their ropes today instead
00:03:00.860of their capes. I hope they follow the law. The law is very clear. The 14th Amendment,
00:03:06.780The Birthright Citizenship Clause of the 14th Amendment was enacted to overturn the Dred Scott decision, the post-Civil War Supreme Court decision that said that the freed slaves are not American citizens.
00:03:21.420And so we enacted the 13th Amendment to outlaw slavery, the 14th Amendment to provide due process and equal protection to the freed slaves, and the 15th Amendment to provide voting rights to the freed male slaves.
00:03:35.600That was extended to Black women with the 19th Amendment.0.53
00:03:39.300But as part of the 14th Amendment, we overturned the Dred Scott decision with the Birthright Citizenship Clause, and it gave birthright citizenship to the freed slaves.
00:03:50.100Now, the language talks about all persons born in the United States subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, and that part is key.
00:04:00.380You have to be both born in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction.
00:04:05.540American Indians were not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, and so Congress had to pass birthright citizenship for American Indians by statute.
00:04:17.420So you have to ask this dispositive question of these justices, those who auditioned as textualists and originalists to get their jobs.
00:04:27.140If American Indians are not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States under the 14th Amendment, how the hell would illegal aliens be subject to the jurisdiction?
00:04:37.140And the answer is they clearly are not.0.98
00:04:39.720Again, this is a very easy legal case.
00:04:45.500And everyone understands the history of this and the purpose of the Indian Naturalization Act, which came later, about 40, you know, 40, 50 years later, I believe, in 1924, that that gave the citizenship to the American Indians.
00:05:03.120And obviously there were a series of wars that were fought with the American Indians, Custer's Last Stand, all of these things took place in the intervening years.
00:05:10.140So the idea that this would apply to all of these extraneous groups, like some kind of giant umbrella, which is what the ACLU is trying to argue, it just doesn't hold any water whatsoever with the actual historical record, does it?
00:05:25.100No, and this is crucial, Jack. Our most crucial sovereign power as we the people, the sovereign citizens of America, is controlling our border and controlling our populace, deciding who gets to come, who gets to go, and who gets the benefit of citizenship.
00:05:44.860And we never agreed to give birthright citizenship to illegal aliens, not at our founding, not after the Civil War with the 14th Amendment and not any subsequent Congress since then.
00:05:57.880Now, you see a Fox News poll that shows that birthright citizenship for illegal aliens is widely popular, has 67 percent support among Americans.0.61
00:06:07.100Okay, well, if that's the case, the Supreme Court should be more modest here and decide the 14th Amendment like the Supreme Court decided for American Indians, which it doesn't apply to illegal aliens, and let Congress decide, let we the people decide through our elected members of Congress, whether we want to grant birthright citizenship to illegal aliens, just like we did for American Indians.
00:06:33.560Let's just let's just hope and pray that these six Republican appointed Supreme Court justices, those who claim they're textualist and originalist, have the modesty to do that.
00:06:47.000Let's just hope that they wear robes instead of capes.
00:07:09.720We're holding over Mike Davis, the elusive Mike Davis, here at Human Events Daily.
00:07:17.240And in our way, and our golden age has just begun.
00:07:20.760This is Human Events with Jack Posobo.
00:07:22.520Now it's time for everyone to understand what America First truly means.
00:07:27.000Welcome to the second American Revolution.
00:07:32.080I'm Jack Selvig back live here, Human Events Daily, Real America's Voice.
00:07:39.220We're on with Mike Davis at Article 3 Project.
00:07:40.760We're talking about the Supreme Court showdown on birthright citizenship.
00:07:43.240And Mike, I got to say, man, you mentioned there was this poll that came out about the children of illegal aliens and it's like 60% support.
00:07:53.400How do you have a country where Donald Trump, who runs on the policy of mass deportations, and he says it over and over and over, wins the popular vote, wins seven out of seven of the swing states.
00:08:04.560And now people are trying to tell us that, oh, birthright citizenship for illegal alien children is popular.
00:08:18.100I think these things are wildly unpopular.
00:08:20.060I think illegal immigration is wildly unpopular in the United States.
00:08:23.400I think that birth tourism is wildly unpopular in the United States, not to mention a gross violation of our sovereignty.
00:08:29.640As you say, it's a gross violation of our country.
00:08:32.640It's a violation of the sovereign powers of the executive here, the president of the United States.
00:08:38.460All of these things are violations of our country, violations of the rights of our people and the violations of the rights, obviously, of our due elected president of the United States.
00:08:46.280But but, Mike, that being said, these are complex, thorny issues.
00:08:51.680The justices in some of these cases involving immigration, we know they have to say the least, they've they've gotten a little wobbly.
00:08:59.480Do you think this is an uphill battle for the administration with not just this court, but with the courts in general?
00:09:07.340I worry this is a seven to two case, and I worry that the only two justices who will actually have the courage to follow the law here are Justice Clarence Thomas and Justice Sam Alito.
00:09:20.140I worry that the chief justice and the three Trump justices will join the three leftists who will always vote against President Trump.
00:09:30.100But again, the law is so crystal clear here that we, the people, the sovereign citizens of America, get to decide who comes, who goes, get to decide who our fellow citizens are.
00:09:43.740We certainly did not give that away after the Civil War, the 14th Amendment, the birthright citizenship clause was to correct an egregious wrong with the Dred Scott Supreme Court decision that held that the freed slaves are not citizens.
00:09:58.400We fixed that with the 14th Amendment.
00:10:01.300There have been there is a Supreme Court case that has extended that to lawful and permanent residents of the United States, the Chinese exclusion case.0.59
00:10:10.460But there is no way in hell that the proponents of the 14th Amendment or the public at the time ever agreed to give birthright citizenship to illegal aliens, to give birthright citizenship to 1.5 Chinese birth tourists who are coming to America, giving birth in America, going back to China, where they never step foot in America again.
00:10:35.700they're American citizens, and then in 18 years, they get a vote, they get a mail-in their vote0.54
00:10:40.720from Beijing, there's no way in hell we agree to that. And if the Supreme Court actually holds
00:10:47.480that the 14th Amendment gives birthright citizenship to Chinese birth tourists,
00:10:53.400the Supreme Court is going to torch its legitimacy with the American people.0.99
00:10:59.900I think that's exactly right. And I think the legitimacy is going to absolutely come in
00:11:04.140question. And look, if that's the case, if that is the case and they come out saying that we need
00:11:10.520a Supreme Court or excuse me, a constitutional amendment to overturn birthright citizenship
00:11:15.800and to hammer this out. And, you know, you could even just call it a revision of the 14th
00:11:23.420amendment. Then by all means, by all means, we can push it. The president can push it. This would
00:11:29.140be a popular effort. This would absolutely get passed. I think it would definitely get passed.
00:11:33.040It's something, by the way, that could even become an entirely new way to change the midterm elections this year if we put that on the ballot and we say we are fighting for the citizens of the United States of America and to end this scourge once and for all a constitutional amendment.
00:11:51.680And by the way, not just on birthright citizenship, on all immigration laws.
00:19:30.180And he says, quote, have they any more rights than a sojourner in the United States?
00:19:34.580So he's trying to persuade the Republicans to his view by appealing to a common understanding that sojourners do not have children who become citizens.
00:19:43.720So there's powerful evidence there that everybody understood this to, you know, not sweep in the temporary sojourner.
00:19:52.480All right, Jack, so we're back live here at Human Events Daily, Real America's Voice.
00:19:58.060And Joshua, you know, you heard the Solicitor General there, Solicitor General Sauer there.
00:20:03.060And what I want people to do, and I think this is important, is that we're we have an issue of frames here.
00:20:12.520And you saw Ketanji Brown Jackson doing this over and over saying, oh, well, if I go to Japan and I steal a wallet, I'm subject to the jurisdiction of the Japanese laws.
00:20:23.360It was just ridiculous statements or, you know, even Robert saying, oh, well, it's a new world, but it's an old constitution.
00:20:30.280Is it just just let's let's let's let's actually understand that because the frame of the framers of this law, because we do have to look at the frame, we're having an argument about frame.
00:20:41.240This isn't actually a an argument about words.
00:20:45.520It's an argument about frame, because if you adopt them frame of today, then, of course, you apply all of the the situations of today, the exclusions of today.
00:20:54.140But if you adopt the frame, we're just trying to understand the intent.
00:20:56.320We're just trying to understand the intent behind the 14th Amendment.
00:20:58.340What was America in 1866? And there's this question of the American Indians. Well, guess what? We didn't even have a full United States in 1866. There was a series of wars that were fought between America, the American army and American Indians during this time.
00:21:18.820So their status as citizens. Right. Didn't duly come up until the 1920s. Why? Because it was a different world. You had the Russian Empire was still on the American continent. The Spanish Empire was in Cuba. The British Empire was sort of lurking about and, you know, was was up in Canada.
00:21:41.160Still, the Spanish-American War wouldn't come for another 30 years.
00:21:44.520So the idea that we could just, again, apply every single little standard of the current situation to something like immigration, which by its very nature is something that a nation can dial up and dial down at any time, is something that we need to take into consideration.
00:22:04.720And again, I'm just talking about the definitional, the definitional concepts behind these words like jurisdiction, these words like allegiance, what all of these things meant to the framers at the time.
00:22:20.740So there was a situation where Justice Gorsuch asked a question about, well, would this apply to, you know, American Indians?
00:22:27.040Well, it's like, well, at the time, American Indians were in territories.
00:24:52.840That's exactly right. And and Joshua, and I'm just going to say this, by the way, because I think it's very obvious. But, you know, when you have the ACLU lawyer and she's coming up out there saying, oh, you're all Americans, you're all Americans, too.
00:25:06.180She knows what she's doing. She knows exactly what she's doing. She knows what the implications are of what she's pushing.
00:25:12.060She knows what she is advocating for, a mass restructuring of the United States.0.94
00:25:18.980She knows the implications of her arguments, and she does want all non-citizens to be automatically granted citizenship in the most open and the most expansive way possible0.94
00:25:31.900because she understands what it would do to the United States in terms of destabilizing0.96
00:25:38.900our system of laws, our system of government, in furtherance of what you just said, of allowing0.99
00:25:45.080these masses of millions of people to come to the United States and automatically be granted
00:25:49.640citizenship and gimmies under our laws. Yes, it's often said that, oh, the Great
00:25:56.960replacement is just a conspiracy theory and then for years you have had let's say democratic
00:26:04.800aligned influencers politicians even their allies and proxies amongst the ngo community
00:26:11.040they will say things like in one breath obviously that's a conspiracy theory amongst racists
00:26:16.860followed by and it's good that it's happening and we're spending billions of taxpayer dollars to
00:26:22.700make sure it happens even more. Ultimately, the vision is to make the United States a permanent
00:26:29.180one-party state. In much the same way that California has had unrestricted warfare engaged
00:26:34.980against it by the Chinese Communist Party, that same objective is meant for the United States of
00:26:40.700America. Precisely right. Jack Posobiec, Joshua Lysak, right back.1.00
00:26:52.700Where is Jack? Where is he? Jack, I want to see you. Great job, Jack. Thank you. What a job you do.
00:27:03.620You know, we have an incredible thing. We're always talking about the fake news and the bad,
00:27:07.300but we have guys, and these are the guys who should be getting Pulisic.
00:27:13.440All right, Jack Posobiec here. We are back. Human Events Daily, Real America's Voice. Folks,
00:27:18.100let me be blunt. Before the crashes of 1999 and 2008, a rare market signal appeared. Most people
00:27:24.600ignored it. The smart money didn't. Gold and stocks were rising at the same time, and that is
00:27:29.120not normal. Stocks were supposed to rise when confidence is strong. Gold rises when confidence
00:27:34.200starts to break. They move in opposite directions until something underneath the system is off.
00:27:39.280Well, right now, they're both breaking records again. That has only happened twice before major
00:27:44.580market repricing events. Does that mean it crashes tomorrow? No. But it does mean that risk may be
00:27:50.280dangerously mispriced. Gold doesn't surge because it's popular. It moves when currency confidence
00:27:56.400weakens, debt explodes, and central banks prepare quietly behind the scenes. Here's what should get
00:28:01.440your attention. Banks are buying gold at record levels right now. They're not guessing. Gold
00:28:06.900doesn't depend on earnings. It doesn't depend on credit markets. It doesn't depend on political
00:28:10.340promises stocks do you have savings or retirement account you don't get a do-over this is about
00:28:16.020protection not speculation so give them a call 844-577-POSO or visit protectwithposo.com
00:28:23.460that's 844-577-P-O excuse me 844-577-7676 or protectwithposo that's P-O-S-O.com learn how a
00:28:34.980Gold IRA can help shield what you've worked decades to build.
00:28:42.820And folks, I want to remind everyone that Real America's Voice is, of course, going to be covering the Artemis II launch tonight in just about four hours' time, 624 p.m. Eastern Standard.
00:28:56.140This is going to be just an incredible mission, and hats off to the brave American astronauts that are going to be on this mission.
00:29:06.800Another programming note, Turning Point USA will be streamed live tomorrow night.
00:29:13.280A huge event at George Washington University featuring Erica Kirk, the CEO of Turning Point USA, Caroline Levitt, the press secretary of the White House, and yours truly, Jack Posobiec.
00:29:28.660And I will endeavor to hold my head straight as opposed to the corkscrew way that they have it on the on the shot here.
00:29:35.720But, yes, we'll all be there tomorrow at George Washington University, so make sure you tune in to Real America's Voice, where we're going to be covering that live tomorrow night.
00:29:46.460And then, of course, tonight, the president speaks, 9 p.m.
00:29:49.120I broke last night on a Fox hit that I'm hearing talk of a grand deal that the president of the United States may be presenting tonight to the American people.
00:30:02.600talk about the success of our military and political objectives in iran and then a grand
00:30:07.480deal and connecting the dots all the way back to why this was started this military operation
00:30:14.360and bringing us to today in alignment with our regional partners the arab nations working of
00:30:20.040course with pakistan and now china with their five-point policies we're going to get into
00:30:24.120all of that and real america's voice of course we'll be covering that live as well joshua lisek
00:30:28.200we were talking about this, the destabilization, right? The ACLU understands the destabilization
00:30:34.180to the United States. And this is not the ACLU of the past, which supported everyone's
00:30:39.140free speech rights. No, they were. This is the ACLU of today, which is simply another vehicle
00:30:45.500of the massive far left. And this is this, of course, was our thesis in Unhumans that they
00:30:52.320understand the destabilization effect of their policies. Mondami understands that what he's
00:30:57.860doing is going to destroy New York. Karen Bass understands that what she's doing is going to
00:31:02.560destroy the Los Angeles community, the Los Angeles city. The destruction is the point, isn't it?
00:31:09.960Yes, that's correct. What we consistently see from those conversations and those crises,
00:31:14.120and also from today with Birthright Citizenship, I noticed that when we make an argument of,
00:31:20.720let's say, against Birthright Citizenship, and I think a fellow named At Real Theo Wold did a
00:31:27.740good example of this. He said, it's a simple constitutional question. Does the 14th Amendment
00:31:31.920require that America accept children born to illegal foreigners as citizens? The answer is1.00
00:31:37.580quite obviously no. If the right of American citizenship belongs to the world, then America0.52
00:31:42.400is no longer a sovereign country. That's the point. The various arguments we make against
00:31:49.680birthright citizenship turned inside out become their arguments for it. When we say, no, that0.98
00:31:56.000takes from American taxpayers whose families have been here for centuries? Yes, that's the point.
00:32:01.920But that grants effectively more rights to non-taxpayers, non-net taxpayers, at the expense
00:32:07.800of the, yes, that's the point. But that grants a greater advantage to the Democratic candidates
00:32:13.800and areas and the census and representation. And yes, that's the point. So are arguments against
00:32:19.900it are their arguments for it. All left-wing vitriol in the form of activism like the ACLU,
00:32:27.500which is effectively a proxy for the most progressive, let's so-called, interest of the
00:32:32.760Democratic Party, our arguments, or rather their arguments in favor of hurting us are our arguments
00:32:42.540against being hurt. It's completely different, or rather, shall we say, at-odds viewpoints,
00:32:49.480And I think the more this goes on, it becomes very clear that those of us on the right who have a
00:32:56.680level playing feel, let's keep everything fair, rules-based mentality are at a disadvantage
00:33:03.580because they're not playing the same game as us. They're not following the rules. They will get
00:33:08.280whatever they want. It's like, oh, you didn't decide what I wanted? Well, I'm going to, you
00:33:13.800know uh destroy you and that's that's that's that's the point and it's like what are you
00:33:19.900going to do about that you don't you don't have a country if that's if that's the case so yeah
00:33:24.360we'll see if that is that is the point and and i want to play we we've got a clip here that's
00:33:31.140actually showing exactly what you're talking about and i think it aligns the point that guys
00:33:35.960let's play sat nine not subject to any foreign power is pretty straightforward so let me give
00:33:43.240you these examples um a boy is born here to an iranian father who has entered the country
00:33:50.940illegally that boy is automatically an iranian national at birth and he has a duty to provide
00:33:58.300military service to the iranian government is he not subject to any foreign power
00:34:05.220and there you go right there so you've got justice alito talking about wait a minute
00:34:12.600what about the children of foreigners that are subject to foreign military service what about
00:34:21.340the children of oh i don't know spies to the united states of america would they be automatically
00:34:27.220granted citizenship and of course the aco you replied yes yes they do even if they owe the
00:34:33.840reason their jurisdiction they owe their allegiance go ahead go ahead oh yeah well of course they're
00:34:39.820going to say that, because if you understand that this is America, it's team America versus team
00:34:46.620anti-America, everyone's motives begin to make sense. And you can now, with accuracy, predict
00:34:53.480what's going to happen next, who's going to say what. There's lots of word persuasion happening
00:34:59.580and word thinking, and did the founders mean this, and then the Indians this, and foreign dignitaries
00:35:04.500and diplomats that. But ultimately, it comes down to, is the United States a sovereign country?
00:35:09.820Is it an economic zone for sending people to get their gimmies and stimmies from your own ethnicity, race, or tribe at the expense of the Heritage American taxpayer, who is a net positive taxpayer, and the various groups that are having advocates on their behalf, like the ACLU, for example, coming in, they're net takers.
00:35:33.320they're not givers, largely speaking, but they're takers from the system. It's simply benefiting
00:35:39.340one group at the expense of the other, and that other is the United States. So magic dirt
00:35:44.280hypothesis, it sounds like that really is what is being decided here. Do you become American?
00:35:51.560Obviously, that's ridiculous. You don't immediately adopt the culture, the norms, the values of a0.94
00:35:56.980place. But our position is that the United States of America is not an economic zone.
00:36:03.320it's our home. And this is exactly what Alito has done. He's exposed them. He's actually exposed
00:36:12.460them with this argument by saying that you would allow potentially foreign military or military
00:36:19.240eligible citizens, military eligible children to gain automatic American citizenship. This is a
00:36:27.040farce is a joke. This is ridiculous. And obviously something that we should all take note of0.99
00:36:33.740specifically when we're talking about foreign allegiance, we should not be glib about these
00:36:38.000things. And again, of course, you know, you you'll hear the same thing from the far left when they
00:36:42.760when they, you know, say they're oh, we have to be so worried about foreign disinformation
00:36:46.800running our elections. And it's sort of the old the old joke that, you know, we have to pass voter
00:36:51.620ID so that Putin can't steal the elections again. Well, maybe we have to strike down birthright
00:36:56.600tourism so Putin can't steal American citizenship. Joshua, I know you got to run. Tell us where to go
00:37:04.500and follow you and everything you're working on. Sure thing. Yes, I've got quite a few books
00:37:09.280coming out this year. I turned in literally number four manuscript of number five. So far
00:37:13.360this year, me and my various antics are over at Joshua Lysak on X. Last thing that I want to point
00:37:19.440out is I believe the ultimate goal of the Birthright Citizenship promoters is to have a third world
00:37:25.880president as president of the United States via birthright citizenship and his parents were illegal
00:37:30.960aliens. Wow. No, that's exactly right. Joshua Lysak, take that to the bank. I completely agree
00:37:37.540with that prediction and I would put money on it. Jack Posobiec, right back, Human Events Daily.
00:37:45.380Call this the Jack Posobiec Appreciation Hour. I can say confidently, I believe, I think Josh
00:37:50.460Shapiro would be the vice presidential nominee if it wasn't for Jack Posobiec. And that is,
00:37:54.280And I was thinking, you know, I'māI, U.S. citizen, am visiting Japan.0.93
00:38:03.900And what it means is that, you know, if I steal someone's wallet in Japan, the Japanese
00:38:11.860authorities can arrest me and prosecute me.
00:38:15.980It's allegiance meaning, can they control you as a matter of law?
00:38:20.840I can also rely on them if my wallet is stolen to, you know, under Japanese law, go and prosecute
00:38:29.760So there's this relationship based on, even though I'm a temporary traveler, I'm just
00:38:34.880on vacation in Japan, I'm still locally owing allegiance in that sense.
00:38:42.560Is that the right way to think about it?
00:38:44.620And if so, doesn't that explain why both temporary residents and undocumented people would have that kind of, quote, unquote, allegiance just by virtue of being in the United States?
00:39:12.460she just she triggers my and like the pollen count is high this year but she's triggering my sign1.00
00:39:16.980like i just i can't i can't it's it's the stupidity it is the sheer stupidity of an auto pen1.00
00:39:22.960justice and that's what she is don't do not forget the justice ketanji brown jackson was1.00
00:39:29.320put there chosen and that the commission was signed by a person who lacked mental faculties
00:39:36.920remember go back and read what came out of the her report go back and read everything came out
00:39:42.000about joe biden that he had no idea what was going on he didn't know what day of the week it was
00:39:46.240don't sit there and tell me that joe biden understood what he was signing in terms of the
00:39:51.000pardons and what he was signing in terms of her supreme court nomination selection and commission
00:39:57.020all right i i don't think i'm just gonna say it i don't think that she was appropriately chosen
00:40:02.840i don't think that she was appropriately submitted and i don't believe that she was
00:40:06.180appropriately commissioned by joe biden she was commissioned by an auto pen and that is not
00:40:11.380correct and this is what happens when you have an auto pen justice you you you get someone who's
00:40:16.900up there she's saying she is saying that if you go somewhere on vacation that you now have
00:40:22.280allegiance to that place temporary allegiance temporary allegiance temporarily it's it's it0.99
00:40:29.360is a concept that is so incredibly and profoundly stupid that if you allow yourself to entertain it0.99
00:40:36.220for even a moment it will cause you physical mental and cerebral and psychic pain on a1.00
00:40:40.880spiritual a spiritual level and it's something that that like when i consider it to even consider
00:40:47.720it for a brief period of time it's you just have to understand she doesn't get what she's talking
00:40:52.880about she doesn't understand what these words mean she doesn't understand the concepts she
00:40:56.740only understands what her side wants she only understands what the quote-unquote good people
00:41:02.860on the left because they're not you know the way she looks at is right we're not on the left or on
00:41:09.860the right, there are the good people and the bad people. There are the progressive people
00:41:14.800and the repressive people. And the repressive people are the people who want to take us
00:41:19.960back. That's why Joy Reid says that all the time. They want to take us back, whatever
00:41:24.800that means. And to progress means to move forward. And the arc of history bends towards
00:41:34.540justice. Again, whatever that means. So in her mind, right, we always need to be opening things
00:41:42.500up, quote unquote, opening things up. So citizenship always needs to be open. Government
00:41:46.580programs always need to be open. Justices can do whatever they want. Remember, keep in mind,
00:41:51.560this is Kataji Brown Jackson, who last year was making an argument that was so ridiculous that
00:41:57.720every single justice signed on to and this was in the universal injunction ruling the opinion
00:42:04.880they all signed on to an opinion that had a clause in it talking about how poorly informed she was
00:42:12.320on what exactly the justices do and that she just simply didn't understand the question didn't
00:42:19.040understand the debate and the debate was on whether or not there should be limits on judicial
00:42:23.360power obviously there are and there always have been for america's entire 250 year history of
00:42:29.300course they have but she just acts like she acts like they haven't she acts like that's not a thing
00:42:34.280or at least she did in the uh the injunction ruling and that was uh trump v casa so again
00:42:39.840this is this is what you get this is what you get when you let an auto pen have you have you sit
00:42:45.220there and pop your you know pop yourself up on the supreme court and continue these are lifetime
00:42:52.740appointments, by the way. So that being said, I don't know, perhaps, perhaps she'll resign,
00:42:56.740perhaps she'll resign for some reason. You know, these, these are the problems. These are the
00:43:03.220problems that arise with so much of this. These are the problems that we get into. And it's like,
00:43:11.360it's like getting your wallet stolen. I want to go back to what I was saying before. So people,
00:43:16.000look, I get that in DC right now, and you know, people are texting me and people are,
00:43:20.300kind of going around and there's these questions, you know, the Supreme Court feels skeptical,
00:43:25.640feels like this might not be a W, but you know what? It is a W in a sense that it is a W for
00:43:30.700the country that we're finally having this conversation at all, that we're finally in a
00:43:34.840place as a country where we are deciding as a people, as a nation, as a heritage, do we want
00:43:44.440to control who is in this country or not. I argue that we do, and I argue that we should.
00:43:51.320And I would argue that these aren't, and think about what we're talking about, right? These are
00:43:54.920nine people, nine judges, unelected, sitting on a Supreme Court who get to make this decision.
00:44:01.860Should they be allowed to make this decision unilaterally? I don't think so. And I don't
00:44:06.960think the American people think so either. And so if this mechanism of a Supreme Court case
00:44:13.520doesn't get us the relief that we need from illegal immigration, from illegal aliens0.81
00:44:19.220invading our land and robbing us of our sustenance, and in many cases, robbing us of our people,0.95
00:44:27.300robbing us of the good of their lives, as well as the remit, as well as the treasure
00:44:34.220that we have built, the economic good, then guess what? I'm all for it. An illegal immigration
00:44:40.960constitutional amendment. So in the illegal immigration amendment, we are going to have
00:44:46.000provisions on all of these things, every single piece of it. We're going to have revisions on
00:44:50.580all of it. We are going to go through everything, everything that needs to be hashed out. And we'll
00:44:56.080go get, we'll go get the guys at the Claremont Institute to put this all together. We'll have
00:45:00.340them figure it out. They'll be able to hash it down. We'll get the, we'll get the dudes from
00:45:04.520border Hawk to talk about some of the direct issues. And we will figure this out because
00:45:09.260guess what? You know, they're right. You know, John Roberts, when he says, oh, well, it's an
00:45:13.200old constitution. It's the, you know what though? The 14th amendment was not part of the original
00:45:16.880constitution. As a matter of fact, John Obamacare is not a tax John. No, I still haven't forgiven
00:45:23.500you for that. And I probably never will because these people don't actually care about the law.
00:45:28.560They care about looking good in the newspapers. They care about looking good in the, uh, in the,
00:45:36.040the intellectual, intellectual, you know, intelligentsia of Washington, D.C.
00:45:42.000And look, I'll even say it, folks. I'll even say it. I agree with Mark Levin on this.
00:45:47.340I agree with Mark Levin, who's someone I've listened to his radio show for years, by the way.
00:45:52.340And he's 100 percent right when it comes to the hubris of the Supreme Court.
00:45:57.740Mark Levin, 100 percent correct when it came to the Supreme Court.
00:46:02.940I know that he and I have been at odds lately over certain things, and he certainly had some words there.
00:46:09.220But you know what? I completely agree with him on that.
00:46:12.340And I think that we as a country do need to get to a point where whether it's by constitutional amendment or by executive action,
00:46:19.100we need to understand that we have three branches of government and they are meant to be separate and co-equal.
00:46:25.640You cannot have one branch that completely usurps the power of another.
00:46:29.780You can't have the Supreme Court coming in and making these decisions over who is allowed in and out of this country at any given time and doing so in contraviction, doing so to impeach and to overturn the will of the people of this country.
00:46:50.100and the will of the people of the United States of America was electing Donald J. Trump to conduct
00:46:56.040mass deportations of the people who are not supposed to be in this country. And if that
00:47:01.980if that requires an illegal immigration amendment, then I say, let's do it. And I say I'm for it.1.00
00:47:06.880And I say the American people will be for it. And we will make the midterms of all about illegal
00:47:11.300immigration. And we will do so. We will do so in contravention of the United States Supreme Court0.94
00:47:17.060and anyone else who dares to stand against us.
00:47:22.600Thoughts and prayers to the crew of the Artemis.