Human Events Daily with Jack Posobiec - November 01, 2022


EPISODE 304 - DHS Leaks: Feds Ran ‘Cognitive Infrastructure’ Operations


Episode Stats

Length

26 minutes

Words per Minute

176.38538

Word Count

4,749

Sentence Count

293

Misogynist Sentences

5

Hate Speech Sentences

3


Summary

Who controls the cognitive infrastructure of our nation? Is it we, the people, or is it the federal government through the National Security Agency? That is the question posed to us by the DHS leaks. Now, joining me to get into that all today is Libby Emmons, the editor-in-chief of the Post Millennial, and she is also going to break down the Supreme Court arguments over whether or not affirmative action should stand.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Who controls the cognitive infrastructure of our nation?
00:00:05.800 Is it we, the people, or is it the federal government through the national security agencies?
00:00:12.780 That is the question posed to us by the DHS leaks.
00:00:17.080 Now, joining me to get into that all today is Libby Emmons, the editor-in-chief of the Postmillennial,
00:00:21.980 and she is also going to break down the Supreme Court arguments over whether or not affirmative action should stand.
00:00:28.540 I don't think it will.
00:00:30.000 But I want to remind you guys, AmFest, December 17th to 20th, Phoenix, Arizona, promo code POSO, AmFest.com.
00:00:36.520 I'm going to be there.
00:00:37.580 You're going to be there.
00:00:38.760 Charlie's going to be there.
00:00:39.660 We got Tucker.
00:00:40.340 We got Bannon.
00:00:41.260 We got Hawley.
00:00:42.640 McEnany.
00:00:43.380 Owens.
00:00:44.120 Tim Pool.
00:00:45.000 Lauren Chen.
00:00:45.760 We got Lindell.
00:00:46.540 We got Bober.
00:00:47.280 We got Stucky.
00:00:48.260 Make sure you yourself are in that room.
00:00:51.820 It all takes place, Phoenix, Arizona, December 17th to 20th.
00:00:55.280 Promo code POSO gets you 25% off.
00:00:58.020 AmFest.com.
00:01:00.000 There's a lot of attention on Twitter during the election because of the Hunter Biden laptop story.
00:01:16.000 The New York Post.
00:01:16.260 Yeah, we have that too.
00:01:17.380 Yeah.
00:01:17.600 So you guys censored that as well?
00:01:19.080 So we took a different path than Twitter.
00:01:22.900 I mean, basically the background here is the FBI, I think, basically came to us, some folks
00:01:28.220 on our team and was like, hey, just so you know, you should be on high alert.
00:01:33.460 We thought that there was a lot of Russian propaganda in the 2016 election.
00:01:38.020 We have it on notice that basically there's about to be some kind of dump that's similar
00:01:46.480 to that, so just be vigilant.
00:01:48.560 So our protocol is different from Twitter's.
00:01:50.980 What Twitter did is they said, you can't share this at all.
00:01:54.480 We didn't do that.
00:01:55.720 What we do is we have, if something is reported to us as potentially misinformation, important
00:02:02.960 misinformation, we also have this third-party fact-checking program because we don't want
00:02:06.980 to be deciding what's true and false.
00:02:08.340 Well, ladies and gentlemen, welcome aboard today's edition of Human Events Daily, powered
00:02:12.660 by Turning Point USA.
00:02:14.780 Today is November 1st, 2022, Anno Domini.
00:02:18.080 It is the feast of all saints.
00:02:20.340 It's All Hallows Day.
00:02:22.640 Mark Zuckerberg, he spilled the beans there on Rogan.
00:02:26.680 That was weeks ago.
00:02:27.600 That clip came out where he stated unequivocally that it was the FBI that came to Facebook and
00:02:34.060 presumably Twitter as well, and asked them to censor the Hunter Biden laptop story in
00:02:39.600 2020.
00:02:40.920 And so we knew that there was some connection, some relationship between these tech companies
00:02:46.000 and these tech platforms and the feds.
00:02:48.940 Now we're finding out specifically what that was.
00:02:51.880 And that's what the DHS leak story is all about.
00:02:55.640 We're breaking it down today because what they're telling us now is that the feds ran an
00:03:01.320 operation, quote, to control cognitive infrastructure.
00:03:06.540 What do they believe as cognitive infrastructure is?
00:03:09.120 That's you.
00:03:10.080 That's your mind.
00:03:11.300 That's the thoughts that you have in your head that they said it's not just critical infrastructure
00:03:16.740 in terms of your electricity, your nuclear power plants, the grid, communications platforms.
00:03:25.580 No, no, no, no, no.
00:03:26.280 The cognitive infrastructure of our company, of our country.
00:03:29.360 That's what the Department of Homeland Security was trying to secure.
00:03:33.560 Well, to help me make sense of that, we are joined today by the esteemed Libby Emmons,
00:03:38.260 the editor in chief of the Post Millennial.
00:03:40.040 Libby, thanks so much for coming back with us here on Human Events.
00:03:42.560 Thanks, Jack.
00:03:43.760 So basically, I think what we're seeing here is we've always asked this question, right?
00:03:49.040 Who is in control of the algorithm?
00:03:51.440 How is it that certain things trend and certain things are suppressed and certain people always
00:03:55.380 seem to trend and certain people are always suppressed?
00:03:57.240 And it's simple, right?
00:03:58.020 It was the feds.
00:03:59.700 And we found out that it was the feds that were actually behind the thing, not just starting.
00:04:04.340 By the way, 2020, that was just a test run.
00:04:06.420 That was the dry run because this continued all the way through 2021.
00:04:09.600 We're hearing that it included the Afghan withdrawal, which I don't think that was misinformation.
00:04:15.720 I'm pretty sure that was a big, public, overt event.
00:04:19.040 And then also information about Ukraine, which obviously is a hotly debated topic with a lot of – I mean, it's war, right?
00:04:27.900 So misinformation, disinformation, that's part and parcel.
00:04:31.140 You know, the first casualty in war is the truth.
00:04:34.120 Why is it that the feds have decided to target specifically – and that Orwellian language – the cognitive infrastructure of the world, or really of the West?
00:04:44.500 That's our minds.
00:04:46.020 Why does the federal government and these tech companies believe that it's in our best interests for them to do that for us?
00:04:54.120 I think the government feels fully that it's in their best interest to determine what the American people should think.
00:05:02.100 The Biden administration, we have seen repeatedly, is very heavy on messaging.
00:05:07.100 Messaging is a huge part of what they do.
00:05:08.860 It's why they bring influencers into the White House in order for those influencers to then spread their White House's preferred narrative across TikTok and Instagram and Twitter and Facebook and other platforms.
00:05:21.540 We see this over and over again, and the government thinks that it's their responsibility.
00:05:26.340 They also seem to think that they are telling us what is going to be in the best interest of the country.
00:05:32.160 But really, it's in the best interest of their own narrative and their own ability to retain power.
00:05:39.320 Well, and what's amazing is the response from some of these people, from SISA, has always been, well, we did this in good faith.
00:05:46.360 These were meetings that were held, and people could see the meeting minutes, and they're starting it.
00:05:50.160 This was all done well, and it goes back to that C.S. Lewis quote, and I wanted to bring it up for everybody.
00:05:56.720 Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely expressed for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive.
00:06:02.940 It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent, moral, busybodies.
00:06:08.560 The robber barons' cruelty may sometimes sleep.
00:06:12.160 But those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
00:06:20.360 Mm-hmm.
00:06:20.900 Wow.
00:06:21.300 Yeah, and I think that's what the government was doing.
00:06:23.160 I think as far as tech companies go, they were trusting the government.
00:06:27.120 They were trusting elected leaders to know better than they did.
00:06:29.980 Tech companies do not employ people who studied philosophy and political science and learned to think for themselves.
00:06:37.040 That's not what these people are employed to do.
00:06:38.800 These people are employed to write code, to come up with ideas, to push advertising onto people, to manipulate algorithms.
00:06:47.320 And they don't have a lot of ethics.
00:06:49.320 They're not trained in ethics.
00:06:50.620 They're not trained to think for themselves.
00:06:52.120 They're trained to do what they're told and follow, you know, whatever these – this coding and stuff.
00:06:58.200 You know, I did not learn to code, so I apologize for my language on that one.
00:07:01.500 Ah, busted.
00:07:02.940 No, but so what gets me, though, and this obviously ties in with Elon.
00:07:07.440 So Elon is digging through now.
00:07:09.200 He's looking at the algorithm.
00:07:10.640 He's Neo in the matrix, we've said.
00:07:12.780 And he even put a tweet out where he said there's something like 10 managers for every actual coder at Twitter.
00:07:19.120 So these managers, I mean, part of that, you know, it could be, you know, fulfilling these diversity ESG quotas.
00:07:24.980 And we're going to get into that in the next segment here when we talk about affirmative action.
00:07:28.420 But also there's this idea of why do we need fact checkers on the internet?
00:07:34.440 Why do we need all of these things?
00:07:35.880 You know, I'm fine with Snopes existing, right?
00:07:39.420 For as stupid as they are and ridiculous as they are and PolitiFact and these other ones, I'm fine with them existing.
00:07:43.460 But at the same time, why are the tech companies listening to them when it comes to suppressing speech and then takes a step further?
00:07:51.800 This includes a whole constellation of censorship organizations like the Internet Observatory Project out of Stanford, some of these other orgs out there, third party organizations.
00:08:01.900 It seems like they've done the work specifically of censoring our Internet and what what, you know, is said in these documents.
00:08:11.060 They're trying to take over the cognitive infrastructure of our country.
00:08:18.240 Forty seconds left. Libby Evans.
00:08:20.560 Yeah, I think you're exactly right.
00:08:22.200 They are trying to take over the cognitive infrastructure of our country and that's us.
00:08:25.740 And so we need to work even harder to think for ourselves, to look at all of the available information and to make our own analysis.
00:08:33.260 We can't just trust the people who claim to be our betters to tell us what to do and what's important and what to think.
00:08:39.680 There's no reason we should go along with that.
00:08:42.100 And as for the fact checkers, they're so biased.
00:08:45.000 It's unbelievable how biased they are.
00:08:47.000 They're not even aware of their own.
00:08:48.480 Well, if there's if there's anyone about it, you know, if there's anyone we truly can always trust, of course,
00:08:53.740 it's the federal government are coming back right after the break.
00:08:59.020 We are going to break down these Supreme Court arguments in affirmative action.
00:09:03.140 Stay with us.
00:09:03.960 Human Events Daily continues.
00:09:06.680 If you want to know what the left's real plan is for your kids,
00:09:09.940 just look at the reaction to the work that Patriot Mobile did in multiple schools in Texas.
00:09:14.660 The left is losing their minds.
00:09:17.440 Patriot Mobile is America's only Christian conservative mobile phone provider and a force for conservative values.
00:09:22.660 This is because they take a portion of your bill and fund conservative causes and candidates who believe in the sanctity of life,
00:09:29.040 freedom of speech, the Second Amendment, and they are winning.
00:09:32.420 Patriot Mobile has affordable plans for you and your family, even your business.
00:09:35.180 They offer the same great nationwide coverage as the major carriers because they believe in.
00:09:39.960 They offer the same nationwide coverage as the major carriers because they use multiple major networks.
00:09:45.320 Plus, you are supporting conservative values with every call.
00:09:48.300 Go to PatriotMobile.com slash POSO and get free activation when you use promo code POSO.
00:09:53.240 Special discounts are available for veterans and first responders.
00:09:56.680 Join the movement.
00:09:57.660 Make the switch today and start making a difference.
00:10:00.340 Seriously, give money to people that support your values.
00:10:04.000 Stop giving money to people who hate you.
00:10:06.020 PatriotMobile.com slash POSO.
00:10:07.620 Link in the description.
00:10:08.520 Let me ask you another question because I take it that your position is that UNC is allowed to consider other non-race-based personal characteristics of individual applicants,
00:10:22.380 like someone's status as a parent or a military veteran or a disabled person,
00:10:27.480 and give pluses in the current holistic environment for those characteristics without running afoul of the 14th Amendment.
00:10:35.420 Is that right?
00:10:36.140 I think that is generally correct as long as it's a criteria that is not walled off by the 14th Amendment.
00:10:42.140 It's appropriate.
00:10:42.360 They can give pluses.
00:10:44.980 And so what I'm worried about is that the rule that you're advocating,
00:10:49.280 that in the context of a holistic review process,
00:10:51.900 a university can take into account and value all of the other background and personal characteristics of other applicants,
00:11:01.020 but they can't value race.
00:11:02.860 What I'm worried about is that that seems to me to have the potential of causing more of an equal protection problem than it's actually solving.
00:11:12.800 The Supreme Court taking up arguments, oral arguments yesterday in a case for the constitutionality of affirmative action.
00:11:22.140 You know, I've always said and Libby, you know, you come in here because I know you listen to these in great detail.
00:11:27.020 I've always said that, look, if you want to talk about systemic racism,
00:11:29.920 if you want to talk about institutional racism in the United States, that's great.
00:11:33.520 Let's start right off the bat with affirmative action, which is a government program that demands racism on these institutions.
00:11:41.860 You can also look, by the way, that obviously this started with college admissions,
00:11:45.740 but we've seen these diversity quotas through ESG and so many other things throughout our society.
00:11:51.020 And when I think that when you focus on this idea of diversity, which is interesting because at one other point, just throw it out there for everybody.
00:11:59.380 Clarence Thomas even asks, can you define what diversity is?
00:12:03.640 Can you actually define that?
00:12:05.100 How do we know when we've attained diversity?
00:12:07.860 And second question, can you prove that diversity contributes to the educational benefit of the students?
00:12:15.340 Can you prove this? And they say, well, it's you know, it fosters a richer learning experience and it's it's a it's a less biased environment.
00:12:25.400 And then, you know, Judge Justice Thomas cuts them off and goes, OK, but again, what are the educational benefits?
00:12:32.320 Because you're not actually telling any of us.
00:12:34.940 And look, you know, just to say it, the root word of the word diversity is divide.
00:12:40.500 It's divisive. That's the entire point.
00:12:42.600 Yeah, I did listen to the oral arguments yesterday in this case, and I thought that they were really fascinating.
00:12:51.060 And there was a substantial difference between Thomas, as there so often is, and his more left leaning counterparts on the bench.
00:12:58.700 Thomas argued, you know, that these are the same that the arguments that were being made on behalf of UNC and Harvard's ability to maintain race
00:13:08.380 as a useful thing for the application process, he said that he had heard the same arguments they were making as in favor of segregation,
00:13:18.460 which we know that Thomas has, you know, been on the bench for a long time and he's seen an awful lot of arguments going on here.
00:13:24.940 And he's not someone who will suffer fools, particularly, and has not taken advantage of affirmative action and things like that in his education.
00:13:34.480 It's not something that he experienced.
00:13:36.480 And I also thought it was fascinating that so many of the arguments in favor of allowing universities to essentially use race as a thumb on the scale
00:13:46.340 to determine that one applicant should be admitted over another is that the use of affirmative action and diversifying a student body
00:13:55.960 then leads to diversity in society and in professional industries outside of society.
00:14:02.380 So their argument is very much that the outcomes that they desire justify the means that are used to get there.
00:14:11.140 But that's a circular argument, isn't it?
00:14:12.980 Yeah.
00:14:13.340 Because they keep saying, well, we want to increase diversity.
00:14:15.360 We want to increase diversity.
00:14:16.440 And he's saying, OK, what are the empiric benefits of increasing diversity for the sake of diversity?
00:14:24.700 And all they keep responding with is it increases diversity.
00:14:28.240 Right.
00:14:28.920 So we want to increase diversity so that there is more diversity is essentially the argument that was being made by the attorneys for UNC and Harvard.
00:14:37.640 And it was it was just fascinating to listen to this and to listen repeatedly to Thomas ask over and over again, can you define diversity?
00:14:46.160 Can you tell me what the educational benefits are to diversity?
00:14:49.520 And we've seen work by Thomas Sowell, among others, that discusses how diversity is not necessarily beneficial, particularly for black students who have tended to achieve in greater numbers in environments where diversity is not the focus.
00:15:07.560 And instead, education is the focus.
00:15:10.400 Individual pursuits of knowledge are the focus.
00:15:13.500 So I think that that is I think it's really interesting.
00:15:15.620 And I do wonder what's going to happen.
00:15:17.380 We're, of course, not going to know until sometime in the spring what it is that the court has decided.
00:15:23.860 Right.
00:15:24.280 And obviously, look, you know, I see when it comes to what we may know sooner if we get another Dobbs leak.
00:15:29.180 But obviously, you know, that's not something that normally happens, which, of course, here we are.
00:15:33.500 Another term has started at the Supreme Court and we still have yet to find out who supposedly the leaker is still there, as far as we know, unless there's been staff turnover or somebody was already, you know, planning to leave that kind of thing.
00:15:44.400 But what I thought was really interesting, you know, going back to that that clip we just played, you know, Ketanji Brown Jackson, she's she's basically making the affirmative action argument in by saying that, OK, we think there was racism and that there was systemic racism in the past.
00:15:59.860 And the way that we're going to solve that is with more racism.
00:16:03.980 Mm hmm. Yeah.
00:16:05.700 And there's also this idea, of course, that the word racist is not applicable to any group other than the minority, the majority group being racist towards a minority group.
00:16:18.220 So that's something, too, is the definition of racism has continuously changed over the years.
00:16:22.700 And of course, the students for fair admissions is arguing primarily on behalf of Asian American students who they say get the short end of the stick in not gaining admission when people are given admission who have less lower test scores and whatnot on the basis of race.
00:16:42.700 Jackson also said that because she believes that the notation of what your race is when you submit a college application is voluntary, that that sort of creates a situation where because the universities aren't specifically demanding that you tell them what your race is, that means that it's not bad for them to consider it.
00:17:04.300 What didn't didn't Mindy Kaling's brother? Wasn't this a whole thing where Mindy Kaling's brother applied to medical school, was rejected as an Indian American and then later reapplied and wrote African-American, was accepted and then conducted all four years or how many years of medical school by essentially just posing as an African-American?
00:17:24.220 Mm hmm. Yeah, I remember something about that as well.
00:17:27.000 And yeah. And he came clean about it afterwards and said, this is crazy that this system exists.
00:17:32.020 Meanwhile, by the way, you know, I'm all for it, by the way, if you want to go, if that's a system, then game the system.
00:17:37.940 Just break this thing. Everybody, you know, pull the Elizabeth Warren.
00:17:41.280 Everybody declare yourself Native American. What are they going to do? What are they going to check?
00:17:44.600 They're not going to check. That's racist. That's racist to check.
00:17:47.200 So they're not going to check. They're not running DNA tests, which was the greatest troll of that was ever done of Elizabeth Warren to actually get her to do the DNA test.
00:17:54.500 But no, Libby, I'm with you. I think that I think it's possible that affirmative action could be on its last legs.
00:18:00.060 And I think that's good because I think we need to go back to a society that's based on merit and actual achievement and not just based on the, you know, the color of the skin you're born with.
00:18:08.780 I think I think that's what we should be. Totally agree.
00:18:13.200 All right. Coming back. Human Events Daily. We're going to get into Guantanamo Bay.
00:18:17.420 What's going on down there? Stay tuned.
00:18:18.420 Jacob, let's talk about what DHS was telling you and Ken Delaney and essentially that they're not sending and will not send, and I quote, Haitian migrants from the border to Gitmo.
00:18:29.480 How do you reconcile that now with your reporting of this new contract, this new ask?
00:18:36.300 It's exactly what we've reported all along, Yasmin.
00:18:40.120 This request for information, a request for proposal that went out from the Biden administration last Friday was to continue an existing program at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, at the Naval Station Guantanamo Bay.
00:18:52.060 It's a little known ice detention center there.
00:18:54.280 They call it the MOC, the Migrant Operations Center.
00:18:56.660 And they say that it's going to staff up to 20, sometimes maybe 400 in a surge migrants from Haiti, Cuba, other countries that are interdicted at sea.
00:19:06.960 There's no indication.
00:19:07.880 There was no indication that migrants would be moved from the southwest border to this facility at Guantanamo Bay.
00:19:13.100 But it is an indication by the Biden administration they're going to continue to use this facility at Guantanamo Bay in order to not only hold,
00:19:21.260 but repatriate, if not in their home country, in Haiti, to other third countries where they say the U.S. government says they can do so safely.
00:19:30.480 So Guantanamo Bay, back in the news for folks who don't know the history with me.
00:19:36.600 I did serve at Guantanamo for about a year.
00:19:39.340 I did an individual augmentee operation there serving in the interrogation detention unit.
00:19:44.820 But also there's this history of Gitmo that people don't realize about the Migrant Operations Center is that those camps at Guantanamo wasn't originally set up for terrorists that were brought off the battlefields of the Middle East.
00:19:58.420 That actually Clinton was the one that set these up and had to do with Cuban refugees, had to do with Haitian migrants, the boat lift people that were caught trying to get trying to cross the Gulf into Florida.
00:20:10.100 You had to come up with some place to put these people. And so it actually started as tent cities across the island.
00:20:15.600 And then because of there are people who are committing crimes or seem to be violent, those were the ones that were initially held in these detention camps.
00:20:23.120 That's the history of how Guantanamo Bay was founded.
00:20:26.600 And so at least in terms of the detention center, the base itself goes all the way back to Spanish-American War.
00:20:32.000 It's actually our oldest overseas base. And the United States should never, never give it back up.
00:20:37.220 That being said, lots of lots of great memories for me from from being there.
00:20:41.620 Not that was my favorite duty or anything, but playing with the banana, these giant banana rat rodents that ran around rock iguanas that are like three times the size of anything.
00:20:51.420 And and watch the, you know, watching crazy movies on these really bad drive in theaters.
00:20:57.240 But no, Libby, when it comes to this idea, right, of holding these migrants at Guantanamo Bay, you can hear on MSNBC they're losing it there because they some they seem to feel as though that they're these people have some kind of right to come to the United States.
00:21:13.180 Whereas when you're looking at it and from a perspective of Guantanamo Bay, it just makes sense because it's right next door.
00:21:20.040 That's the point.
00:21:20.740 Yeah, I see what you're saying. And it does seem to make sense if they're I mean, Guantanamo Bay is right there.
00:21:27.180 If these are people who are coming from, you know, the islands in the Caribbean and whatnot.
00:21:32.900 But I think that you're correct. MSNBC and a lot of Democrats do believe that illegal aliens, illegal migrants, illegal immigrants, whatever phraseology we're allowed to use per fact checkers this week,
00:21:45.080 do have a right to the resources and hospitality of the United States, so much so that they're not doing anything to keep the border closed or to even really mitigate the flood of migrants into the U.S.
00:21:59.520 Here in New York City, we've seen the mayor extending such a welcoming hand that actually existing homeless people in New York are feeling shortchanged because they're not getting the same kind of outlay of resources and support.
00:22:15.320 But, yeah, I think you're I think you're exactly right.
00:22:17.620 And for folks, by the way, who don't understand. Yeah.
00:22:21.480 For folks, by the way, who don't know the the the geography down there off the top of their heads from where Guantanamo Bay is situated on the eastern tip, the southeastern tip of Cuba.
00:22:33.220 It is the very next piece of land that you would hit if you're coming across west from Haiti.
00:22:39.040 It's literally right next to obviously the Haitian side of the island.
00:22:44.140 But, you know, talking maybe about 100 miles or so off the coast of Port-au-Prince, off the coast of some of these areas that have been hit.
00:22:51.300 So it's right in the corridor where these migrants are coming from.
00:22:54.640 Now, they're being interdicted by the Coast Guard.
00:22:56.960 We know that they're coming across. They're being interdicted by the Navy.
00:22:59.420 Of course, you have narco traffickers and everything else wrapped up in this.
00:23:02.120 And I think, look, I think that's it personally, personally, when it comes down to it, it makes sense for the United States to have some kind of handle on what's going on in the Caribbean in terms of these flows that affect our country directly.
00:23:17.280 We are a great power here and it's perfectly acceptable for us to act like this in our own backyard.
00:23:21.920 Yeah, we are a great power and we should stop apologizing for that and stop acting like we aren't and stop acting like there's some problem with the power that we have.
00:23:33.560 We're, you know, we're big and mighty and we should take advantage of that.
00:23:38.400 I wouldn't I wouldn't say that that means we should go around, you know, like searching for for issues and say, like, I don't know, Eurasia and East Asia and Vietnam, et cetera.
00:23:46.980 But, you know, when it comes to something like this, I mean, this is obviously something that has a direct effect on the on the American people, direct effect on commerce, on trafficking throughout throughout our southern borders, throughout our southern waterways.
00:23:59.600 So why shouldn't we?
00:24:01.740 Well, securing our border gives freedom to our citizens to live and work as they choose.
00:24:07.340 I think it's important that we do that and that we respect the rights of Americans to the resources of this nation as well, instead of just constantly giving everything away.
00:24:15.860 We've seen this all over the place.
00:24:17.780 The amount of money that we're spending internationally is so amazingly large when you look at also the people who are needing stuff here in the U.S.
00:24:27.700 and they're just not getting it.
00:24:29.320 The homeless people in New York are annoyed that refugees and migrants and whatnot are getting more than they are.
00:24:36.160 Why aren't we taking care of our own homeless population before introducing a whole new homeless population here?
00:24:41.000 No, precisely.
00:24:42.580 No, imagine imagine how history would have been different if we had actually annexed Cuba after the Spanish-American War rather than rather than, you know, allowed independence and actually maintained direct control over Cuba.
00:24:55.000 But by bringing them into the United States, I don't know, could have been an entirely different scenario.
00:24:59.900 But Libby, we're out of time here on the show.
00:25:02.340 Where are your coordinates?
00:25:03.300 Where can people follow you?
00:25:04.120 I'm at Libby Emmons on Twitter, and you can find our work at ThePostMillennial.com every day.
00:25:11.820 We love when Libby Emmons is on.
00:25:13.960 I think we're going to get her back.
00:25:14.960 Producer Angelo, put Libby back for a couple more days this week.
00:25:17.840 I want to get her on because her takes on this stuff are excellent, especially when it comes to the Supreme Court.
00:25:22.460 This idea of divisive diversity.
00:25:25.060 Should that be how we run our country?
00:25:26.820 Should that really be how we run our admissions?
00:25:29.680 I don't think so.
00:25:30.460 But as always, our promise, our oath, our solemn vow to you, be good, be brief, be gone, your homework for us.
00:25:34.680 Share this out with one, just one of your normie friends.
00:25:36.460 Then leave us your five-star review.
00:25:38.720 Apple, Spotify, wherever you get fine podcasts.
00:25:42.360 We've got a lot going on this week.
00:25:44.220 Remember, we are coming into, it is now November, all right?
00:25:48.300 We're coming into the final days of this year.
00:25:50.940 We are in a fight for our republic.
00:25:54.560 Will our republic succeed?
00:25:56.620 Will these ideals that we fight for, the ideals of freedom and liberty, the ideals of safety and security for our people, for the people that live on our land, will they prevail or will we turn and enter into that door of totalitarianism?
00:26:12.940 I don't know.
00:26:13.680 By the way, a little shout out to my buddy, Lex Friedman.
00:26:16.480 Lex, if you're going to have the CEO of Pfizer on again, buddy, you got to ask him if those vaccines actually stop the spread.
00:26:22.940 Ladies and gentlemen, as always, you have my permission to lay ashore.
00:26:25.460 We'll be right back.