Human Events Daily with Jack Posobiec - EPISODE 322： THE SAUDI SHUFFLE - DID PRES. BIDEN ASK THE SAUDIS FOR A QUID PRO QUO OVER KHASHOGGI？

00:00:00.000 We're putting scalps on the board today, folks, scalps on the board.

00:00:04.940 First, we're going to Saudi Arabia for the Saudi shuffle.

00:00:08.560 What's going on?

00:00:09.400 Did the Biden administration leak a story about Saudi Arabia and MBS getting immunity

00:00:15.700 in exchange for increasing oil production?

00:00:19.120 Or was it completely fake?

00:00:20.340 And then AP reporter that we called out, James Laporta, summarily fired for lying about the

00:00:27.800 Ukrainian missile that hit Poland.

00:00:30.220 You need to get into this episode.

00:00:33.160 But first, I want to remind you guys that we know there's a lot of craziness going on out

00:00:36.980 there.

00:00:37.560 There's so much, but we are going to come together and we're going to map out the way forward

00:00:42.760 for 2023 and 2024.

00:00:44.540 And the summit all takes place in Phoenix, Arizona with myself, Charlie Kirk, Steve Bannon, Tucker

00:00:51.140 Carlson.

00:00:51.840 You must attend this workshop.

00:00:54.420 You must attend this training seminar because we are going to put the pieces together.

00:00:59.280 We're going to have a special ticket sale that runs this weekend.

00:01:01.880 Amfest.com starting on Friday, goes all the way through to Cyber Monday.

00:01:07.000 Amfest.com promo code POSO.

00:01:09.120 Make sure you secure your attendance to this summit.

00:01:13.620 Let's get into it.

00:01:24.420 Over the summer, did the U.S. strike a deal with Saudi Arabia to boost oil production?

00:01:30.500 Look, there was, we talked about it before the trip, that energy security was going to

00:01:37.800 be something the president talked about when we went, that we were having conversations

00:01:42.800 with Saudi Arabia before the trip about better balancing supply and demand.

00:01:48.640 Well, ladies and gentlemen, welcome aboard.

00:01:50.980 Today's edition of Human Events Daily powered by Turning Point USA.

00:01:54.220 Today is November 22nd, 2022.

00:01:57.220 And no, Domine.

00:01:58.720 Folks, the Biden administration put out this.

00:02:03.560 We think the Biden administration put this out, this massive story that they've given immunity

00:02:09.320 to MBS for the killing of Khashoggi.

00:02:12.760 There's these lawsuits involving him.

00:02:14.560 But remember, we know what the Biden administration is desperate for.

00:02:18.580 They are desperate for oil production to go up from OPEC because they know gas prices are

00:02:26.380 absolutely looking at like they are going to skyrocket during the holiday season.

00:02:31.000 They know that the economy is going to crash because Q4 is not shaping up the way they want

00:02:36.680 it.

00:02:36.820 Just it is what it is.

00:02:37.800 It's not shaping up.

00:02:38.660 So a story pops in the Wall Street Journal and all of a sudden, based on anonymous sources,

00:02:44.780 anonymous sources that I believe we're going to find out comes from the Biden administration,

00:02:51.000 their White House themselves, that says the Saudis are going to ramp up oil production because

00:02:56.680 of the MBS immunity over this Khashoggi killing, the lawsuits, et cetera, et cetera.

00:03:02.380 Here's the problem, though.

00:03:04.200 The Saudis just came out and completely denied the entire thing.

00:03:09.340 They said it's absolutely false.

00:03:11.460 And so for a couple hours there, for a couple hours, price of oil on the futures market absolutely

00:03:16.840 tanked.

00:03:17.820 Then Saudis deny the rumors.

00:03:19.380 Then the price goes all the way back up.

00:03:21.220 It looks like, and I've been talking to some folks on the street, as they call it, they're

00:03:27.340 saying this looks like market manipulation.

00:03:29.380 They look that it looks like somebody may have had some oil puts in this and probably

00:03:34.680 made a ton of money in that situation because the market moved that much on fake news.

00:03:41.360 To help me explain all of this, to help me break it down and make sense of all of it,

00:03:44.340 bringing on again Libby Emmons from the Post Millennial to kind of ride co-chair Libby. 1.00

00:03:48.560 Thanks for coming on with us.

00:03:50.000 Sure thing, Jack.

00:03:51.700 So Libby and you at the Post Millennial were in the middle of breaking this story and we

00:03:56.980 were going through it.

00:03:57.960 And then all of a sudden the Saudis come out. 1.00

00:03:59.620 It was like whiplash back and forth.

00:04:01.700 Why do you suppose this is going on?

00:04:03.500 And do you agree with my assessment that it very well may have been somebody within the

00:04:09.100 Biden administration that leaked this story?

00:04:11.300 Again, one of those anonymous sources to The Wall Street Journal.

00:04:15.040 I think there's a good chance that it was a leak directly from the Biden administration.

00:04:18.420 And I wouldn't really put anything past this administration when it comes to using and manipulating

00:04:24.020 media in order to achieve their personal ends and ends to line their own pockets.

00:04:29.980 We keep seeing stuff like that.

00:04:31.780 So, yeah, I think there's a I think there's a pretty good chance that that that's true.

00:04:37.140 I also think if you said that publicly, there's a good chance that you would get fact checkers

00:04:41.220 out after you as well.

00:04:43.980 Right.

00:04:44.360 And that's that's why I always have to say, you know, I think, you know, or potentially

00:04:47.540 I think that would be the most likely reason.

00:04:50.420 You know, of course, we you know, we're getting fact check left and right.

00:04:53.020 They're coming after our Facebook.

00:04:54.140 They're going to everything.

00:04:54.820 But what's interesting, though, at least on Twitter now, because Elon is back and it's

00:04:59.560 just kind of allowed freedom of speech to come back, I should say.

00:05:03.100 Apparently, NPR was messing with me on this.

00:05:04.800 We have to pull that clip or was very, very upset with me for for saying that all the

00:05:09.040 people who were conducting censorship operations at Twitter have all been summarily fired and

00:05:13.980 frog marched out of there, which, you know, I have no problem with whatever.

00:05:16.880 You know what?

00:05:17.260 And here's here's my response to NPR, which I haven't heard the clip yet.

00:05:20.120 We're trying to dig it up.

00:05:20.900 Um, my response to NPR is as follows.

00:05:24.360 NPR, you mad?

00:05:26.840 Stay mad.

00:05:28.180 Stay mad.

00:05:29.200 NPR.

00:05:30.120 But but really, Libby, when we look at these situations, right, the Biden administration

00:05:36.260 knows this economy.

00:05:38.420 OK, they did well in the elections.

00:05:39.780 They did better than they thought they were going to do.

00:05:41.260 They lost the house.

00:05:42.400 The economy is not going to get any better.

00:05:44.360 I think he's probably thinking about the fact that, you know, he's going up for reelection.

00:05:47.900 He says that he's going to run again.

00:05:49.780 And they realize that their administration, even if even if they were able to maintain

00:05:55.240 the Senate, they're not in a good place going forward for a twenty twenty three or twenty

00:06:00.820 twenty four.

00:06:01.620 I mean, you know, going in front of the American people and saying they need to get hired again.

00:06:04.960 I think they're thinking about the polling.

00:06:06.780 I think they're thinking about their standing.

00:06:08.080 And the fact that at the at the end of the day, they still haven't allowed for an increase

00:06:14.300 in American domestic oil production.

00:06:16.640 And that's really what this is all about, isn't it?

00:06:18.220 Yeah, I think that's a really huge issue as well.

00:06:21.640 And I'm glad you mentioned that, because I do think that American energy independence

00:06:25.800 is something that any leader of this country should be striving for with their utmost

00:06:31.460 vim and vigor.

00:06:33.100 And that's something that the Biden administration is not doing.

00:06:35.680 They are beholden to the green lobby.

00:06:37.560 They have said outright that they want to eventually completely dismantle the fossil fuel

00:06:43.400 industry. And then they turn around and blame oil producers for not striking out and drilling

00:06:50.260 more. Meanwhile, how are you going to get more investors in your company if you have

00:06:55.000 the federal government claiming that they're going to shut down your entire industry?

00:06:58.960 Well, it's also they play this game, right?

00:07:02.240 They play this game. And I see libs falling into this trap all the time where they say 1.00

00:07:05.440 and Jen Psaki used to say it all the time when she was in there and they would get this

00:07:08.640 question. They would say, why are gas prices going up?

00:07:10.580 And they say, well, they have the permits. They have the permits.

00:07:12.480 They have the permits. No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no.

00:07:14.340 No. Just because you have leased land does not mean you have full approval, right?

00:07:19.320 They're playing a show game when they say, of course, do you honestly think that the oil

00:07:23.600 companies don't want to drill oil?

00:07:25.180 Do you think that they like having to get oil processed and shipped from overseas and

00:07:30.780 bringing it into the United States?

00:07:32.100 You really think that they want that or they want to be able to drill oil here so they don't

00:07:35.560 have to pay anyone in the middle for all of that?

00:07:38.500 It's ridiculous. It's so ridiculous to me.

00:07:41.120 And yet they play this game where they say, oh, the leases are out, the permits are out,

00:07:44.840 but they can't get the approvals to do the actual drill.

00:07:48.320 Look, we went up to Alaska.

00:07:49.940 We went up there last year under the Biden administration.

00:07:52.080 And guess what? Nobody was drilling that.

00:07:54.440 I saw I saw these amazing, incredible, wonderful, as Charlie says, oil rigs.

00:07:58.860 They weren't moving. Nobody was working.

00:08:00.600 You know why? Because of the Biden administration.

00:08:03.140 And Libby, I think what it is, I think that they are just tied theologically and financially

00:08:09.000 to this green movement, to this pagan medieval cult of Gaia.

00:08:14.640 And that's what it's all about.

00:08:15.560 But but Libby, we'll get into more in the next second, because I have to say I have to

00:08:19.920 say it's hard to grasp why anybody would keep voting for record inflation, skyrocketing

00:08:25.720 climb and an open border.

00:08:27.320 Likewise, why would anybody continue funding the left by sticking with the big wireless

00:08:32.500 carriers? Patriot Mobile is America's only Christian conservative wireless provider, and

00:08:37.580 they want to make it easy for you to try their service.

00:08:40.260 Libby, I'm going to tell you right now, Libby, you need to give them a 60 day trial to show

00:08:44.940 them why I trust them right now.

00:08:46.540 Libby, when you try Patriot Mobile for two months, you'll get your third month free plus

00:08:50.920 free activation.

00:08:52.680 They offer nationwide coverage on the best 4G and 5G networks, the same towers as all

00:08:57.740 three of the carriers.

00:08:58.920 So Libby will get the same great service while supporting a company that's fighting to preserve

00:09:03.400 our God given rights and freedoms.

00:09:05.400 Libby, what you need to do is go to PatriotMobile.com slash POSO or call them their 100 percent

00:09:10.760 U.S.-based customer service team.

00:09:12.880 Libby, if you're fed up with woke companies that don't care about Libby's values, support

00:09:17.780 a company that does.

00:09:18.920 Make the switch today and get a free month of activation and free service.

00:09:23.020 PatriotMobile.com slash POSO.

00:09:24.540 That's PatriotMobile.com slash POSO.

00:09:30.480 Russian, Emmanuel, you know, this is war.

00:09:32.980 And I think that both sides will accuse another side of this, another side of this war.

00:09:40.880 Yes.

00:09:41.440 I think that we don't need escalation, escalation between Russia and NATO.

00:09:46.480 We don't need it.

00:09:48.540 Emmanuel, do you think that I want to have war with Russia?

00:09:53.740 No, believe me, I don't want to have, I don't want to have war with Russia.

00:10:01.000 And believe me, I'm extra careful, extra careful.

00:10:05.220 I'm talking only about Article 4.

00:10:08.180 I don't talk about Article 5.

00:10:10.880 So what you will do, what.

00:10:12.960 So that was the president of Poland, Andrzej Duda, coming out and saying that, no, it was

00:10:17.860 actually a prank phone call.

00:10:18.920 He thought he was on the call with the president of France.

00:10:22.080 Turns out it was a couple of pranksters.

00:10:23.660 But you heard him saying there, I don't want war with Russia.

00:10:26.480 I don't want Article 5. 0.93

00:10:28.080 We shouldn't do this.

00:10:29.520 And thank God, right?

00:10:30.640 Thank God.

00:10:31.220 Because we don't want World War 3. 0.89

00:10:32.700 I don't think anybody does.

00:10:33.560 But what's amazing, and Libby, you guys have the story up, so I want to break it down.

00:10:38.760 I'll give you the chance to break it down from post-millennial side.

00:10:42.080 The AP reporter who broke, quote unquote, oh, he broke a lot.

00:10:47.800 All right.

00:10:48.060 This guy, he was breaking a lot of things, broke the story, wrote the story that Russian 1.00

00:10:54.680 missiles had hit Poland that was later retracted and turned out to be completely false because

00:11:00.080 it actually was Ukrainian missiles.

00:11:01.820 And people got very upset at me because I had an emotional response to Poland getting 1.00

00:11:06.000 hit.

00:11:06.320 I never blamed anybody, by the way.

00:11:08.000 Never blamed anyone.

00:11:09.320 Never.

00:11:09.520 You had people like Daryl Cooper lying about me, saying that I said the U.S. should get

00:11:13.220 involved.

00:11:13.740 Right.

00:11:13.900 Never said that.

00:11:14.760 I just said, nope, I want Poland. 1.00

00:11:16.960 Like, if this was a deliberate attack on Poland, then yeah, you better believe I want 1.00

00:11:20.760 blood.

00:11:21.400 But it wasn't.

00:11:22.540 And I never said who.

00:11:23.460 And I never said anything like that.

00:11:25.200 But well, yeah, this guy was fired.

00:11:27.580 Walk us through the story.

00:11:29.520 Yeah.

00:11:29.920 So the AP put out a story saying that Russian missiles had landed in a or missile had landed

00:11:36.960 in a Polish town on the border and killed people.

00:11:41.260 It seemed very clear that this could incite World War Three absolutely directly, because

00:11:48.040 of course, we have a deal with NATO, Poland is part of NATO, that if there is an incursion

00:11:54.700 on Polish soil, the U.S. will begin to think about measures to counteract that, to go after 1.00

00:12:03.680 whoever caused that incursion.

00:12:05.800 And I remember the day that this happened and you and I were talking about this and we were

00:12:09.540 talking about this at the post-millennial and trying to figure out what was going on.

00:12:13.460 And we looked at it and we said, you know, we really ought to slow our roll on this one.

00:12:17.140 The AP came out with this report with an anonymous source who was saying that it was Russian, that

00:12:24.560 it was Russian missile.

00:12:26.280 They didn't say directly that it was an attack, but they did say that it was a Russian missile.

00:12:30.200 And it later showed that it was not a Russian missile, that it was, in fact, you know, armaments

00:12:36.940 from Ukraine, what they were calling sort of friendly fire along those terms, and that

00:12:42.120 the AP had gotten the story all wrong.

00:12:44.520 The only problem with getting the story all wrong in a case like this and going with an

00:12:48.220 anonymous source in a case like this is that, yes, it could directly lead to nuclear destruction

00:12:54.660 of the entire world.

00:12:56.640 So who's the guy who has been a little more careful?

00:12:58.680 What was the guy's name and what was the process that led to his firing?

00:13:02.020 Um, yeah, so the process that led to his firing was that it became clear that he just went

00:13:09.960 with this source and didn't get any confirmation.

00:13:12.240 His name was Laporta.

00:13:13.580 I can check my notes on that.

00:13:15.180 James Laporta.

00:13:16.040 He's 35 years old.

00:13:17.300 James Laporta.

00:13:17.760 So that's right.

00:13:18.780 If we've got a wall of scalps, we've got to put James Laporta up on the wall, fired from

00:13:25.120 NPR, a guy, by the way, who used to work for the Daily Beast to actually appear as a scumbag

00:13:31.640 who actually came up from the gutter, but kept all the scum on him from that gut.

00:13:38.500 It wasn't a diamond in the rough.

00:13:39.780 No, he was scum in the scum and the slime never washed off of him because he just, he

00:13:45.980 drinks slime for breakfast.

00:13:47.700 That's pretty much all he does.

00:13:48.600 He bathes in it and rolls around in the muck.

00:13:51.740 And he decided to go and take his sleazy slime bag ways to the Associated Press.

00:13:57.840 Now, the Associated Press is typically seen as one of the most objective and most trusted

00:14:05.620 names in American media.

00:14:07.100 It just is.

00:14:07.620 It just really is.

00:14:08.540 I wouldn't say that people realize that, you know, CNN and New York Times have definitely

00:14:13.820 lost a lot of their veneer of respectability.

00:14:16.660 But the Associated Press still very much maintains theirs.

00:14:19.840 And so, Libby, what does it mean that a guy for AP, so they were dumpster diving.

00:14:25.480 For some reason, they went down way down into the very bottom of the dumpster past the,

00:14:30.260 you know, the the groomer, the groomer approvers, which we're going to be talking about a little

00:14:35.800 bit next, all the way down in through the depths, right through the Dante circles, all

00:14:41.040 the way down to the Daily Beast, which is basically at the level of journalism of like

00:14:45.060 the SPLC or Media Matters, one of these like David Brock, George Soros kind of, you know,

00:14:50.480 mouthpieces.

00:14:51.700 And they elevate them up to the AP level.

00:14:53.860 You just don't see that.

00:14:54.740 And I got to say, AP, you really can't hire somebody from there.

00:14:57.980 You really can't.

00:14:59.320 Don't ever even think about it again.

00:15:01.520 This guy, by the way, a complete disgrace, not only to his name, a disgrace to the Marine

00:15:05.780 Corps.

00:15:06.000 He lied, by the way, about being at one point.

00:15:08.380 He said he was an Intel Marine.

00:15:09.800 No, that's not true.

00:15:10.500 He did some Intel for his unit at one point.

00:15:13.020 So he used to lie about that.

00:15:14.560 And it just goes to show you that when you trust liars from a place like the Daily Beast,

00:15:18.960 then this is what you end up with.

00:15:21.080 You end up with World War Three all over your face because you've got a piece of scum who 1.00

00:15:26.560 will never be able to be anything but that.

00:15:28.840 Libby Evans.

00:15:30.420 Yeah, I think this is very concerning that the AP let this pass.

00:15:33.760 People forget that journalism is not an easy job.

00:15:36.980 It's very difficult.

00:15:37.800 And if you're going to be trusting anonymous sources, you better get confirmation from

00:15:42.360 multiple sources to make sure that what you're reporting is on point.

00:15:46.020 This Laporta fellow clearly did not do that.

00:15:49.360 And I think it's probably right and just that he should not be in the profession of journalism

00:15:54.080 anymore.

00:15:54.540 I mean, perhaps he wants to go write about some beauty contests in New Hampshire or things

00:16:00.060 like that.

00:16:00.640 But he certainly shouldn't be reporting on I wouldn't trust him.

00:16:03.980 I wouldn't trust him around those if we're talking about, by the way, there's those those

00:16:07.420 with the little girls.

00:16:08.560 No, I wouldn't trust this guy around little girls, not for a second.

00:16:11.580 Now, little girls, little boys, you definitely want to keep them away from James Laporta and

00:16:16.460 pretty much any journalist in in general.

00:16:18.640 You know, I really don't think that that that's something that should be appropriate or

00:16:22.680 should ever, ever be followed.

00:16:24.140 But Libby, let me give you the final word.

00:16:25.740 And you're an editor.

00:16:26.620 What would you have done if someone under under your tutelage had had committed an act

00:16:33.440 like this?

00:16:35.140 I certainly hope that my first impulse would be to say, hey, where did you get this information?

00:16:39.300 I need to know who your source is.

00:16:40.900 Show me everything about this.

00:16:42.720 That's something that I've done before working with journalists who bring me original stories.

00:16:46.920 And it's why original reporting takes a lot longer to turn around than like these people

00:16:51.780 said this on Twitter.

00:16:52.720 You know, you have to like go dig and find it out.

00:16:57.200 But for some of this gravity, would you have run it based on one anonymous source?

00:17:01.520 No, I would not have run it based on one anonymous source.

00:17:04.380 And I certainly wouldn't have run it without as the editor speaking to that source myself

00:17:08.180 and digging into where they're getting their information and trying to get them to go on

00:17:12.220 the record because something like this, there's no reason we're just about out of time.

00:17:16.180 But but it's exactly right.

00:17:17.300 Right.

00:17:17.500 There were journalists on the ground.

00:17:18.740 We're talking about something that happened with physical evidence, with photographic evidence.

00:17:22.140 I mean, you easily could have gone and verified this before running with it, but that's

00:17:26.160 not what they did.

00:17:27.160 And so what we say to the James Laportas out there in the rest of the world, when you look

00:17:32.000 up a definition of scumbag in the dictionary and see a picture of yourself, don't worry,

00:17:36.920 because I'm sure there are many, many other journalists who will soon join you.

00:17:40.880 Hours before what they called an all ages drag brunch, which is probably the number one target 1.00

00:17:48.740 of these anti-LGBTQ events recently.

00:17:54.480 Like, for example, the Proud Boys will go and protest any drag brunch, any any drag story

00:18:00.440 hour, anything that a child might go to meet a drag queen, you know, just to show them that 0.98

00:18:06.340 they're human beings and people, they talk, they go there and they they read Dr. Seuss

00:18:09.960 there.

00:18:10.300 They read regular books, but it's read by a drag queen and they, you know, they have 0.97

00:18:14.820 breakfast.

00:18:15.880 It is not some hypersexual event, but that's what it's viewed as on the far right.

00:18:20.880 I've been following this since about March and April.

00:18:23.420 We follow, you know, online hate trends, I guess.

00:18:26.200 And since April and March, really, the LGBT community has been the main focus of this hatred.

00:18:32.120 It starts if there is a pipeline, it starts from some smaller accounts online, like lives

00:18:37.260 of tick tock.

00:18:38.380 It moves to the right wing blogosphere, and then it ends up on Tucker Carlson or it ends

00:18:42.740 up out of a right wing politician's mouth.

00:18:44.820 And it's a really dangerous cycle that that does have real world consequences.

00:18:49.400 So Brandi Zerodny, Ben Collins, blaming the right wing, blaming lives of tick tock for this 0.99

00:18:57.180 horrific, admittedly, obviously regrettable and horrific event that took place in Colorado

00:19:01.220 Springs, the shooting, blaming it on all of them, us, basically.

00:19:05.560 But then you also have Ben Collins coming up there and saying, you know, these these events

00:19:09.880 are fine.

00:19:10.980 Is it this it's perfectly fine to bring children around drag queens? 1.00

00:19:13.980 It's totally normal.

00:19:14.860 There's nothing wrong with it.

00:19:16.480 Look at how far we've gone.

00:19:18.140 Look at how far we've gone as a society where a few years ago we were told that, oh, this

00:19:23.760 stuff isn't involved with children to now having an NBC reporter up there specifically telling

00:19:30.840 us that it's like some type of required and totally normal part of a child's development

00:19:37.960 and maturation process for them to be exposed to drag queens and have them, which is inherently, 1.00

00:19:45.260 obviously a sexualized event in a sexualized area, because otherwise, what's the point that

00:19:51.440 they are supposed to go through this and parents should be doing it?

00:19:54.320 And what I talk about here, Libby, and I want to get your take on it as well, but I wrote

00:19:58.300 this on Twitter.

00:19:58.900 I'm going to say it again.

00:19:59.960 This is a great example of how these people, Ben and Brandy, they are members of what I

00:20:04.560 call the disinformation archipelago's research units.

00:20:08.720 And so the disinformation archipelago, these are these various outsourced censorship groups

00:20:13.800 who don't employ.

00:20:15.480 Right.

00:20:15.900 So here's how it works.

00:20:16.740 They don't employ censors.

00:20:17.920 They call them researchers and then the researchers utilize a version of what Nancy Pelosi called 0.62

00:20:23.540 the wrap up smear and it creates a closed circuit smear loop.

00:20:28.240 So what you have is that one researcher then quotes the target, but twists there.

00:20:33.560 So the researcher names the target, twist their words, twist what they're saying, ascribes

00:20:38.780 new meaning to it.

00:20:39.920 Then one, then you get, and this is the best part.

00:20:43.100 They get a journalist then to quote the researcher reporting the research on the target, whether

00:20:50.460 it's a tick tock or Matt Walsh or you or me or talk, whoever it is, Charlie, Steve.

00:20:56.240 Obviously, this is done to Donald Trump again and again throughout his presidency.

00:20:59.100 It creates your feedback loop.

00:21:02.820 This is also, by the way, Tim Pool talks about cytogenesis.

00:21:06.680 People have mentioned that for for Wikipedia, that you have a very bored.

00:21:11.540 And so let's say you're looking for a source on something.

00:21:14.000 You go through a Wikipedia article and you have a very bored and lazy writer.

00:21:17.680 They check out Wikipedia and they glance at whatever the summary is.

00:21:20.880 But then some Wikipedia editors come over and say, well, you know what that, you know,

00:21:25.060 that this article is actually kind of kind of light.

00:21:27.560 We have to find a better source for it, more from a more credible source.

00:21:30.920 And then they go and look at the article that was written based on the original bad Wikipedia

00:21:35.120 article.

00:21:35.780 Then they put that in and cite it after the fact of the actual article itself.

00:21:41.400 And so you get circular reporting, citing.

00:21:44.600 So circular citations, a.k.a.

00:21:47.100 Cytogenesis.

00:21:48.160 Libby, what is going on here?

00:21:50.320 And does this have you seen any other examples of this where these research units of the

00:21:56.940 disinformation archipelago are then reported as truth and then the report becomes the mainstream

00:22:02.760 narrative that we're never allowed to change?

00:22:06.160 Yeah, I think it happens all over the place.

00:22:08.560 I think it's happening with this whole conservatives are responsible for violence against LGBTQ.

00:22:15.400 LGBTQ institutions or what have you, all because conservatives are asking, why do children need to meet drag queens as part of their development?

00:22:24.700 Why do children need to be read stories by drag queens as part of their development? 1.00

00:22:29.540 Why do they need to go to clubs and see drag queens perform and slip them cash as part of their education? 1.00

00:22:36.900 Why does this need to happen?

00:22:38.880 And it needs to happen because as James Lindsay and I were talking about about a year or so ago when he brought this to my attention and I started looking at some scholarly work about the queering of early childhood education, 0.52

00:22:50.880 which is part of the basis of this whole thing.

00:22:54.800 The idea is to break down children's barriers at very young ages and to make them have total and complete acceptance of alternative sexual lifestyles and to sexualize them from a young age so that they don't know what their own boundaries are and they don't ask any questions.

00:23:11.880 And that's what's going on here.

00:23:13.360 And you'll notice that Zadrozny and Collins, they don't address the questions.

00:23:17.900 They don't address the issues.

00:23:19.180 They don't answer for why children need to be sexualized by their teachers or why children need to be told that they could be born in the wrong bodies or that there could be something wrong with them if they like the opposite sex toys, whatever that means.

00:23:32.080 They don't address those issues.

00:23:33.660 They don't ask what's going on with these ideas.

00:23:36.220 And they instead what they do is they target the individuals who are asking the questions.

00:23:40.940 And their goal is to say asking the questions itself is hateful.

00:23:45.860 You are hateful for doing it and you are hateful for asking it.

00:23:49.660 So the information is hateful.

00:23:51.560 Asking is hateful and you're hateful for doing it.

00:23:54.160 So that is their goal.

00:23:55.480 Their goal is to make it so that you can't even ask the question, so that you can't even talk about it and that you can't even say, hey, maybe my child doesn't need to be sexualized by drag queens and teachers who always want to ask five-year-olds what their pronouns are, as if five-year-olds have any idea at all what that means. 0.69

00:24:13.840 No, go off, Libby. 1.00

00:24:16.240 That was Bannon level.

00:24:17.800 That was a Bannon level rant.

00:24:19.200 You let the mama bear out a little bit there, Libby. 1.00

00:24:21.760 I could sense a little mama bear coming out.

00:24:23.920 Yeah, you know my son.

00:24:26.960 I'm seriously protective.

00:24:28.660 Yeah.

00:24:29.060 No, as you should.

00:24:29.860 As you absolutely should.

00:24:30.960 And he's a good boy.

00:24:31.740 And I teach him to think for himself.

00:24:33.780 No, see, that's my thing.

00:24:34.820 I always tell people that when, you know, it's when I'm going off, you don't want to be worried because if I'm talking, everything's fine.

00:24:41.560 When I get quiet, that's when you want to get worried because when I'm quiet, that means I'm planning in a different direction, okay?

00:24:46.820 That means other things are happening.

00:24:49.540 You don't want that.

00:24:50.800 No, but at the end of the day, it's very simple, right?

00:24:54.440 We don't want violence, but we also don't want our children being groomed, and we don't want the normalization of the sexualization of children going on in our society.

00:25:04.560 The way to stop it, it's not with guns.

00:25:06.820 It's not with violence.

00:25:07.860 It's with legislation.

00:25:09.300 It should be banned at the federal and state level.

00:25:11.980 Start with the states.

00:25:13.080 Move the way up to the federal government if you have to.

00:25:15.200 Marjorie Taylor Greene, congresswoman who was just reelected, also just reinstated on Twitter.

00:25:19.600 She's put forward legislation to make this and make these surgeries and these treatments a direct felony. 1.00

00:25:26.280 I would absolutely make it illegal under whatever laws the state needs for these events for children being involved with drag queens or the rest of it completely illegal. 0.98

00:25:39.540 Libby, thank you so much for your time.

00:25:41.280 Thank you so much for being.

00:25:42.080 Make sure everybody goes and follows humanevents.com and The Post Millennial.

00:25:44.920 We will see you tomorrow.

00:25:46.300 Ladies and gentlemen, as always, you have my permission to lay ashore.

00:25:49.600 To all praise you, you are mine.

00:25:52.560 We will see you tomorrow.

00:25:54.560 To all praise you, shall we move your channels.

00:25:56.300 What we'll see you now, is always over and over again.

00:25:58.420 We will see you tomorrow.

00:26:00.500 Love you tomorrow.

00:26:01.740 Peace out.

00:26:02.520 Peace out.

00:26:03.260 Peace out.

00:26:04.480 Peace out.

00:26:05.640 Peace out.

00:26:06.840 Peace out.

00:26:07.860 Peace out.

00:26:10.460 Peace out.

00:26:10.960 See y'all...

00:26:17.940 Peace out.

Human Events Daily with Jack Posobiec - November 22, 2022

EPISODE 322： THE SAUDI SHUFFLE - DID PRES. BIDEN ASK THE SAUDIS FOR A QUID PRO QUO OVER KHASHOGGI？

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript