EPISODE 335： FBI ASSET JAMES BAKER EXPOSED IN TWITTER FILES FALLOUT
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
181.05956
Summary
Former FBI asset James Baker has been exposed in the latest fallout from the Trump administration s handling of the so-called "Steele dossier" by the Deep State. What does this mean for the future of the Russia investigation? And what role did James Baker play in all of this?
Transcript
00:00:00.000
FBI asset James Baker has been exposed in the Twitter files fallout. You've been scrubbing
00:00:07.460
away, Jimmy. You've been scrubbing away. We should call him scrubbing Jimmy. Joining me as today's
00:00:13.300
special guest co-host, it is none other than the ALX himself. So ladies and gentlemen,
00:00:20.580
this show is absolutely dynamite. But before we get into that, if you want to meet myself,
00:00:26.180
ALX, so many of our co-hosts, so many of the people in this movement, then join us along with
00:00:33.480
Steve Bannon in the war room, Charlie Kirk and his show, Tucker Carlson, and Tim Poole and Timcast IRL,
00:00:40.300
because we are going to be doing all of our shows live in person this December 17th to the 20th at
00:00:47.420
America Fest. It's amfest.com. Use promo code POSO. You will get the best tickets. They're flying out
00:00:54.500
fast, so don't come to me when it's sold out. Amfest.com, promo code POSO. Let's get into it.
00:01:10.600
We were looking at what Russia was up to generally and the threat that they pose. We were looking at
00:01:15.180
what they were trying to do with our election. And then we were looking at the events, you know,
00:01:19.100
all the interactions that Director Comey had with the president leading up to the firing,
00:01:23.540
and then the firing. And I felt confident at that point in time that our investigative activities
00:01:29.380
were lawful and appropriate. The so-called Steele dossier, when this came into the FBI,
00:01:34.600
did you know it had been gathered as part of essentially an opposition research request,
00:01:42.540
first by a Republican donor and then eventually by the Clinton campaign?
00:01:45.980
Yeah, my recollection is that it came in with that information.
00:01:50.500
At some point, did you think, what have we? That was alarming to me to read that an FBI informant
00:01:57.400
was still sort of actively helping your investigation, but also pretending to be a Trump ally.
00:02:04.680
Do you see why, under that circumstance, perhaps why the president is so paranoid?
00:02:10.600
I understand why people are concerned about the power of the FBI and some of the investigative
00:02:15.920
techniques that we use, again, without confirming or denying the specifics of what you're saying
00:02:20.060
here. And the point is, what were we trying to do?
00:02:24.020
Well, ladies and gentlemen, welcome aboard today's edition of Human Events Daily, powered by Turning
00:02:27.980
Point USA. Today is December 7th, 2022. Anno Domine, a day which shall live in infamy. Remember Pearl
00:02:36.540
Harbor. Remember Pearl Harbor. That was today. 81 years. But we have to talk about James Baker. So James
00:02:43.780
Baker, you just heard there. This is a guy who resigned from the FBI during the Trump administration
00:02:50.220
because of his role in the dirty steel dossier. Well, as we talked about before, there's a revolving
00:02:58.200
door between the deep state and big tech. And one of the biggest names of all of this was James Baker
00:03:05.100
because James Baker found his golden parachute. His happy landing was at Twitter as their general
00:03:12.180
counsel. However, Elon Musk just last night confirmed that James Baker was summarily fired, exited in Elon's
00:03:22.660
word. But what's interesting is what he was fired for. Matt Taibbi comes out and says that Baker
00:03:31.420
intercepted the Twitter files that came out on Friday night, got a copy of them before they were sent
00:03:42.000
to Matt Taibbi or to Barry Weiss, who's also doing a write-up of them. This is a problem. This is a big,
00:03:49.400
big problem. And apparently that was not supposed to happen. Twitter's new management was not supposed
00:03:54.380
to know about it. And then it also perhaps answers a question for us because we were asking, where's
00:04:01.160
all the evidence of the FBI, the references to the FBI warnings? We know that Yoel Roth was in there
00:04:06.860
talking about the FBI. He filed the declaration with the FBC that said the FBI warned us about Hunter
00:04:12.640
Biden. They said, if you see anything about Hunter Biden, you have to delete it. It's a hack and leak
00:04:16.840
operation. You have to take it down. And yet suddenly all of those references are gone from the Twitter
00:04:21.900
files. How could that be? Why could that be? Was James Baker perhaps involved in scrubbing the
00:04:28.800
Twitter files? Well, guess what? Elon Musk just came out and confirmed that data was deleted from
00:04:37.440
the Twitter file. So to break this down and go through all of it, we have an incredible digital
00:04:42.920
strategist on here. Good friend of mine. You know him. We all love him. Former Twitter P.O.W.,
00:04:49.640
by the way, and Turning Point USA ambassador, the ALX. What's going on, man?
00:04:56.700
So what is your take? And let me see if you agree with my thesis or not. Poke holes in it if you can.
00:05:04.660
To me, it looks like James Baker went in and scrubbed references to the FBI in these Twitter
00:05:08.540
files. It just really looks like that because that was the dog that wasn't barking when we had the
00:05:13.800
Twitter files that came out on Friday night. Now we hear that Baker was involved. What's your take on it?
00:05:18.700
Do you think that's or something along those lines is what's going on? Plus, by the way,
00:05:23.340
folks don't know, ALX is very plugged in when it comes to Twitter. So let us know what you're
00:05:26.700
hearing. Yeah. So I think that's fairly accurate. If you notice the day it was supposed to be
00:05:32.740
released, it was supposed to be released at 5 p.m. Eastern time. And then 5 p.m. Eastern time
00:05:38.440
came around. No release. Elon followed up 40 minutes later saying, yeah, there's some legal stuff.
00:05:43.580
So clearly, I'm not sure who exactly sent it to Jim Baker because it appears Elon wasn't aware
00:05:50.780
himself that it was in his hands and how he intercepted it and that it was just a man named
00:05:57.300
Jim reviewing this and he didn't know that it was Jim Baker. And today you just see that he replied that
00:06:06.600
there was actual deletions happening. And I'm actually wondering if there's some sort of backup.
00:06:11.820
I wonder if they're trying to recover any of the evidence that they can. But yes, it does seem like
00:06:18.320
he was deleting and trying to cover up things, which, you know, that's not too much of a stretch
00:06:26.100
of your imagination. If you're familiar with his background, with, you know, everything that he's
00:06:31.000
been doing at the FBI. And that's got to make you wonder as well as how was he not purged in the
00:06:37.620
initial purge with all of these activists with the high agad with Prague Ergo wall and like everyone
00:06:45.240
else in the initial purge? How was he not purged with all of them? Because it was very well known
00:06:51.820
that this is his character and that he would take any opportunity to cover up for his friends for
00:06:57.140
himself. And Elon had even replied to a tweet from Cernovich back in April before he bought the he
00:07:04.140
bought Twitter in the first place talking about James Baker. So I'm actually going I'm not going
00:07:09.560
to go full 40 chess on this and say, oh, it was a setup, et cetera, et cetera. But clearly,
00:07:14.240
this is a guy who was on Elon's radar and he was kept on for a little while and then eventually let
00:07:21.340
go. And if you notice, that's the same thing that happened with Joel, that you always kept around for
00:07:24.820
a little bit and then he was fired as well. And it looks like for cause. So I guess, you know,
00:07:30.880
and, and, and, you know, I'll be fair. There are people saying, well, maybe it's just a basic legal
00:07:35.120
review. He's making sure there's no, you know, phone numbers and bank records and things like
00:07:39.860
that, which, which by the way, was something that was a huge issue in the Hunter Biden laptop,
00:07:43.620
because there, there is financial information in their personal banking info, cell phones,
00:07:48.260
text messages, cell phone numbers for the president. So that is stuff you have to look at. But at the
00:07:53.280
same time, and I want to hold you after the break, Alex is going to be my co-host for the show
00:07:58.680
today because there's a lot more going on. And I think, I think the old little Jimmy Baker was a
00:08:07.520
naughty, naughty boy. Well, folks, a report recently came out that American household debt
00:08:12.580
income dropped by over $6 trillion just in the second quarter of this year. That's the most on
00:08:17.440
record. We already know that the administration is doing everything in their power to keep you in
00:08:21.980
the dark until after this year, which begs the question, what's going to happen when there's no
00:08:27.260
incentive to hold back? That's why so many of you have taken my advice and protected your financial
00:08:31.800
future with gold and silver from my friends at Allegiance Gold. Allegiance Gold can help you
00:08:36.100
protect your IRA or 401k with physical gold and silver, or if you prefer have it delivered securely
00:08:41.340
straight to your front door. Now, producer Angelo was checking and Allegiance Gold has some of the
00:08:46.800
highest ratings in the industry. Five stars with Trust Link, AAA rated with the Business Consumer
00:08:50.680
Alliance and an A-plus from the Better Business Bureau. Go to protectwithposo.com and get their
00:08:59.380
best offer yet, up to $2,500 of free silver on a qualifying purchase when you tell them that Poso
00:09:04.080
sent you, or you can give them a call. Look, we can't control the Biden administration, but we can
00:09:09.120
prepare for the consequences of their policies. Protectwithposo.com. That's protectwithposo.com.
00:09:14.180
We're going to put it in the link of the description. You talk a lot about prioritization. You know,
00:09:21.720
when you're the CEO of two companies, you really have to focus in on what matters most. What would
00:09:27.500
you say is your number one priority at Twitter right now? It sounds like this is one issue you're
00:09:31.800
thinking about, but what would you say is top of the list? Conversational health, incentivizing more
00:09:38.000
healthy contribution to the public conversation. We've seen abuse. We've seen harassment. We've
00:09:45.920
seen people leave our platform because of it. We've seen voices being silenced because of what's
00:09:51.580
happening on the service, and that is number one. We can't build a platform of speech, a platform of
00:09:59.280
conversation, and a service that will remain relevant to people if people don't feel safe to
00:10:05.560
speak up in the first place. So for all those who believe in free expression and all those who
00:10:10.760
believe in free speech, it's critical that we're not utilizing technologies like Twitter to shut down
00:10:18.260
voices and to silence others. So he's saying we don't want to shut down voices, but he's also talking
00:10:25.280
about harassment and abuse, which leads to moderation. And then he says healthy conversations, but healthy
00:10:32.540
conversations means someone has to decide what's not a healthy conversation. And I'm gonna tell you
00:10:38.840
right now, I hate that phrase, healthy conversations. I remember the Haya using it. I remember seeing it
00:10:44.660
in some of the Twitter documents. And let me throw this to you, Alex. When it comes to Elon versus
00:10:50.200
Jack Dorsey, what do you view as the differences in their guiding philosophy when it comes to running
00:10:58.300
Twitter? Yeah, so I see in Jack Dorsey, you almost see like him almost contradict himself there is that
00:11:06.180
he doesn't want voices shut down. But he also says, Oh, we need healthy conversations. So it seems like
00:11:12.160
they're trying to be this, you know, babysitter online, where you just want everyone to behave all
00:11:18.800
the time. And they're the ones defining the rules. Whereas like, if they actually encourage people to use the
00:11:25.240
tools that they have, say, the block button, or the mute button, they could actually, you know,
00:11:29.940
control for harassment themselves, users could. Whereas, you know, Elon Musk says that he'd like
00:11:36.980
free speech. And that's, that's what's ideal on the platform. And he's already brought back a bunch of
00:11:42.660
users, he wants to unsuspend. A lot of people that were, you know, not banned for illegal content. And
00:11:49.960
that's what they're working on right now. Whereas Dorsey, it seemed like he said publicly that he
00:11:55.780
was pro free speech, but then the enforcement actions where he himself wasn't responsible,
00:12:02.920
he says, but people like the high a gad or Del Harvey or other people who he tasked with the
00:12:08.740
censorship would take control of that and censor people at their own whim. So I think the guiding
00:12:16.420
philosophies are one of censorship and healthy conversations as Twitter defines it from Jack
00:12:22.840
Dorsey versus free speech for Elon. One of the, one of the interesting, uh, debates that's come up
00:12:29.540
through this is Jordan Peterson. And I've been very publicly, uh, saying that I disagree with Peterson
00:12:36.980
on this because he is say stating that he talks about YouTube and he talks about Twitter and all social
00:12:42.700
media. He says, you should not be allowed to be anonymous on social media. And I, I couldn't
00:12:47.420
disagree more. Right. You know, and it's, I don't know if this is like an American versus Canadian kind
00:12:52.160
of thing, but I'm, if you take away the freedom of anonymity online, then you are actually committing
00:13:03.000
extreme censorship because in a time such as we live in really any time, when you think about it,
00:13:11.120
there are always certain things that you're always going to certain taboos that you're always going
00:13:15.660
to get in trouble for discussing. And so the cloak of anonymity is necessary to be able to have those
00:13:22.700
discussions. Uh, certainly if you, you know, if you, if you have a, you have a normie job, you know,
00:13:27.000
if you've got a family, different things, it's only if you want to be a face, if you want to be out
00:13:31.640
there and, and showing your face, by the way, like, like Jordan Peterson and myself, right. That's when
00:13:37.820
you're out there as a career and deciding to take your, you know, take your career into your own
00:13:42.100
hands by doing that. So the issue is, you know, and you've seen this before throughout history,
00:13:47.880
people using anonymous writings, uh, even to the United States, silence, do good, the federalist
00:13:52.400
papers, et cetera. It's always been used. And for me, I'm just going to say it. If there is hope
00:13:58.740
for the Republic, it lies with the Anons. Alex, what's your take? And you have, but you, you're,
00:14:04.880
you've always been kind of like a quasi and on yourself. Yeah. So, so for Jordan Peterson,
00:14:10.980
it comes from a place of privilege. She's a blue check Mark and multi millions of followers. So
00:14:15.700
number one, he can filter notifications. Number two, whatever he says online is his public statements
00:14:20.820
where he's putting his face and his name because he wants to be a public figure because he's trying
00:14:25.700
to build an online profile. That's not true for most Twitter accounts, which number one, aren't even
00:14:31.640
on Twitter for politics. They are just on for consumers, um, to, to read news, to, you know,
00:14:38.420
interact with their friends. So anonymity actually gives them more power to be themselves online, um,
00:14:46.700
without risking losing their job or having consequences. So like you said, I kind of started
00:14:51.580
my career as an anon account because at the time I was a college student. And as we all know,
00:14:57.920
on college campuses, it's not very popular to be right wing. So I also had another job at the time.
00:15:04.960
So while I am in politics now, that's not how it's always been for me. Um, so especially younger
00:15:11.520
students or, you know, young people in general, we've grown up in a era of cancel culture where
00:15:17.840
if we say the wrong thing online, we can get kicked out of school with scholarships or, you know,
00:15:23.320
lose our jobs at a young age and it could ruin our careers. So I think anonymity is...
00:15:27.920
Not even that, but if, if you said something in the past, which was fine at the time that you said
00:15:33.360
it, but then later turned out to be, you know, publicly incorrect or anti-woke or anti-whatever,
00:15:38.840
then people will go and dig that up and say, Oh, look what this person said five years ago,
00:15:43.500
six years ago, seven years ago. Oh, look, he posted an edgy meme about Hillary Clinton,
00:15:47.360
you know, 2016. And now we have to cancel somebody for the rest of their life because they made a joke
00:15:53.480
on Twitter. No, I just, I don't buy it. I don't think so. Yeah, exactly. And that's why anonymity
00:15:58.660
is, you know, important, especially for younger people. Um, and yeah, growing up in cancel culture,
00:16:04.660
we've almost had to self-censor in a way when we're putting our public face out there because
00:16:09.960
we're afraid it's going to be, you know, used against us in the public eye.
00:16:13.320
Yeah. Yeah. I ran an anonymous account. So I, as a former and on, uh, myself, I ran anonymous
00:16:18.600
account when I was in the military. Um, and it was, it was all about game of Thrones and it was
00:16:23.940
this parody thing and it was funny, but I never showed my real face. I never, uh, used my own
00:16:29.700
picture. I think I eventually did, um, you know, towards the end of it, um, when I kind of, you know,
00:16:34.800
quote unquote came out and then eventually changed the account to my current account, which is just my
00:16:39.380
real name. Um, was, but, but the idea that you should have to, you know, you wouldn't be able
00:16:45.620
to use that. It wouldn't be able to use anonymity. It strikes me as, as insane. It strikes me as
00:16:49.680
crazy. And that in and of itself is a form of censorship. And I don't understand how you can
00:16:56.880
say that all of the institutions have become communist and all, everyone's cracking down on
00:17:01.680
you. We live in an age of cancel culture, but also you should have to, you know, put your name
00:17:05.940
up to it. Look, like you said, you know, there's, there's, there's block buttons, there's mute
00:17:10.240
buttons, there's filters. There's so many things you can do to curate your online existence. Just
00:17:14.200
use the tools that are there. It'll be fine. Take a deep breath, Jordan. Everything will be okay.
00:17:22.560
I remember when I was doing hunger games, nobody had ever put a woman in the lead of an action movie
00:17:27.800
because it wouldn't work. We were told girls and boys can both identify with a male lead,
00:17:33.760
but boys cannot identify with a female lead. Oh, absolutely. And it just makes me so happy every
00:17:41.240
single time I see a movie come out that just blows through every single one of those beliefs
00:17:47.220
and proves that it is just a lie to keep certain people out of the movies, to keep certain people
00:17:54.520
in the same positions that they've always been in. And it's just amazing to watch it happen and
00:17:59.780
watch you at the helm. You guys may not know this, but Jennifer Lawrence was
00:18:03.480
actually the first ever female actress in history. There's never been a movie that starred
00:18:09.360
a woman before Jennifer Lawrence ever. Hey, Alex, I don't know if you, did you know that,
00:18:13.520
that she's actually the first ever female actress?
00:18:16.260
This is like a really annoying trend among actresses and, you know, people in Hollywood
00:18:21.760
is that they always have to be the first mover at everything. No matter what, like which role
00:18:27.480
they're playing, it's like, okay, I'm the first, this, the first, that I'm the trendsetter.
00:18:31.540
It's like, I'm not even a movie buff. And it's like, I've, I've seen Alien with Sigourney Weaver
00:18:36.080
or like Kill Bill with Uma Thurman. Like there, there's just like a whole list of examples.
00:18:42.280
Like, Oh, don't worry because our, our crack production team here at Human Events Daily
00:18:47.500
has done us a favor and put together just such a list. Let's go. Sigourney Weaver, Aliens,
00:18:53.660
Uma Thurman, Kill Bill, Linda Carter, Wonder Woman, Linda Hamilton, Terminator, Laura Croft,
00:19:00.540
Charlie's Angels, both one and two, Judy Garland in The Wizard of Oz. Yeah. Fight me on that.
00:19:08.000
Demi Moore, G.I. Jane, Bridget Fonda, Point No Return, Elizabeth Shue, yo, Adventures in Babysitting,
00:19:15.380
Natalie Portman, The Professional and V for Vendetta, The Sound of Music, Susan Sarandon and
00:19:21.260
Gina Davis and Thelma and Louise, Carrie Ann Moss. Remember Trinity and The Matrix. And folks,
00:19:26.180
folks, please gone with the wind. Don't even try and tell me that gone with the wind was not an
00:19:33.860
action movie. Here's what's, here's what's really going on. All right. Here's what's really going on
00:19:38.060
is that this isn't about women in movies. This is actually about Jennifer Lawrence because,
00:19:44.420
and I'll tell you why Harvey Weinstein goes behind bars and guess what? Uncle Harv isn't around and
00:19:52.200
suddenly nobody's picking up the phone when old J Law comes calling and says, please, please cast me
00:19:58.300
in your movie. Suddenly everyone's saying they don't want her. Nobody wants her in, you know,
00:20:03.680
and they might get, they might get some pity parts here, some pity casting here and there. But the end
00:20:07.280
of the day, turns out, turns out that people don't look at her as a serious actress. And that's sad.
00:20:14.480
That really is sad. And I'll even, I'll even say it. I'll admit Silver Linings Playbook. I thought
00:20:18.140
was great. I actually thought that was a great movie. I don't know if it was Oscar worthy,
00:20:21.880
but I thought it was a pretty good movie. It actually filmed it pretty close to my hometown.
00:20:25.400
I thought she was great in that, but here's the deal. She, her career tanked when Harvey Weinstein
00:20:32.080
tanked. And it's actually a story that's more about Hollywood than it is about J Law. What do you
00:20:37.920
think? Yeah, I think that's a fair assessment. Notice like she's trying to reclaim her career after,
00:20:45.360
you know, Harvey Weinstein is no longer in power in Hollywood. I wonder how many other
00:20:51.560
actresses are in the same position, but yeah, she's trying to restart her career and reclaim
00:20:57.040
her fame and saying, okay, I'm the first mover in this and trying to kind of orchestrate this
00:21:02.980
own legacy that she never had to make up for lost time, I guess, because I honestly don't
00:21:08.660
know what the last thing she was in was. So I, yeah, I feel like she's trying to fill a void
00:21:13.820
that like has been missing for a couple of years because of that.
00:21:17.240
Yeah. Because at the same time, you know, you go and look at like the, the me too movement
00:21:22.320
and Rose McGowan, who was just a massive champion for that. Um, Jennifer Lawrence, I mean, if
00:21:29.360
she may have put out a statement here and there, you know, she's denied having sex with Harvey
00:21:33.720
Weinstein a couple of times that when that was, you know, bubbled up to the surface, but she
00:21:38.620
was not front and center as part of this movement whatsoever when it came to, you know, this,
00:21:43.720
this reckoning as, as you might want to call it. And I remember Gwyneth Paltrow was out
00:21:48.600
there and we just had what Gavin Newsom's wife, right? Gavin Newsom's wife gave this
00:21:51.980
chilling testimony though. At the same time, Harvey Weinstein responded and he said, no,
00:21:56.740
no, no. Not only was it consensual, Harvey Weinstein called it transactional. Harvey Weinstein
00:22:03.300
called it transactional. And so when you look at the Hollywood system in general, I think
00:22:09.320
that one of the things that we're pulling apart here is the fact that they've gotten so completely
00:22:13.920
lost from just making good pictures and making good content and that things like the casting
00:22:21.020
couch took over. All right. And we should have discussions about that and that's fine. But at
00:22:27.340
the same time, you're not actually providing anything of value to anyone at that point. And it seems like
00:22:34.760
everything that you get these days is just cookie cutter garbage. And then just another CGI, you know,
00:22:40.420
Cape fest of people punching each other, regardless of it's Marvel or DC or whatever. By the way,
00:22:45.280
that one of the ones that, that, that made me laugh about that was the, um, you were just saying about
00:22:50.020
all the firsts, right? Do you remember when, that, when a bunch of people caught themselves because
00:22:54.080
they were trying to say that black Panther was the first Marvel movie that starred a black actor.
00:22:58.460
And then a bunch of us online were like, there was an entire blade trilogy, you know,
00:23:05.540
they all, they always try and do that no matter, no matter what it is.
00:23:08.940
Yeah. It was, it was what night, 1998, right? It had to have been night. Uh, yeah, it was the
00:23:17.120
nineties. And then, and I'm, I'm actually somebody, I liked all three of them. I like blade and guess
00:23:21.620
what? Like they were just good movies and nobody cared what, what race he was. They cared that he
00:23:28.100
was the day Walker and that he could, that he could fight vampires during the day. Right. That's
00:23:33.360
all anybody cares about. People, yeah. People back then looked at the movie for what it was. Now it's
00:23:38.420
just a competition of, you know, who's first, this is this race, this is this sex. And like back then
00:23:45.500
people just watched the movie for, you know, what it was and enjoyed it for what it was at the time.
00:23:49.800
Right. And the, the issue, the larger issue for all of us, and you see this in companies and,
00:23:56.280
you know, tie it back to Elon, it's, there's two competing systems now. Um, and you can say there's,
00:24:01.660
there's the MAGA system and the, the, you know, the alphabet system and the alphabet system that's
00:24:07.960
the MAGA system is greatness, right? We want greatness. We don't care what the quotient of the
00:24:15.880
demographics of the people that launched the, uh, the, the space shuttle or put a man on the moon,
00:24:22.080
right? We care that the American flag is on the moon. That's greatness. That's what that's about.
00:24:27.100
The fact that we've accomplished that as a country that no other advanced nation has ever been able
00:24:32.800
to replicate none. No one. And we did that with like 1960s pre-calculator technology. So to you,
00:24:41.340
you have two competing and, and contesting, and I'll give you the final word on this ideologies.
00:24:46.880
One is wokeness and the other is greatness. Yeah, exactly. And I, I think that tie, tie into
00:24:52.760
Elon was, is nice because I think free speech is going to show that on Twitter. It's like,
00:24:58.240
there's no wokeness anymore and it's going to be a marketplace of ideas and the best ideas are
00:25:03.360
going to win regardless of race or ideology. Where can people follow you? What are your coordinates?
00:25:07.820
Um, at ALX on Twitter. That's my main one right now.
00:25:13.840
At ALX. It feels like it feels, it feels nice to be able to say that after a couple of years off.
00:25:18.660
Feels nice. Oh yeah. I got it. It's nice to have you back, man. Put it that way. It's nice to have
00:25:22.400
you back. And as always, ladies and gentlemen, you have my permission. Lay ashore.