The January 6th Committee has now brought 4 criminal referrals against President Trump for incitement and conspiracy to commit espionage. What does this mean for the future of the Trump administration? Is this the beginning of the end of the road for the Trump presidency?
00:02:44.060But, I mean, if that's your argument, then why is it that the only person that the January 6th committee,
00:02:52.280Liz Cheney, Adam Kinzinger, and all of them stuck their necks out in defense of was Ray Epps?
00:02:59.340No, it really says everything you need to know.
00:03:01.720And the answer to that is the same answer as, why is the only January 6th participant about whom the New York Times has written a puff piece?
00:03:55.620It's the eternal recurrence of the same clowns who are trying at all costs to undermine Trump.
00:04:04.400But it's not just a third impeachment on a conceptual level.
00:04:08.200It's literally the pedigree of the J6 committee traces back to impeachment efforts a notorious figure that Revolver News helped introduce to the public,
00:04:19.940a notorious figure called Norm Eisen, the color revolution architect.
00:04:25.620Now, Norm Eisen had a lawfare organization called Crew, and one of the people he worked with very closely was called Joseph Sellers.
00:04:35.540Joseph Sellers, along with the NAACP and along with Benny Thompson, initiated a lawsuit against Trump and the Proud Boys and others for January 6th that induced a specific theory of the case.
00:04:51.060And so the whole January 6th committee's theory of the case comes from that initial lawsuit, which you'd think, if anything, is a conflict of interest.
00:04:59.900It's having Benny Thompson run the J6 committee when he initiated a personal lawsuit against Trump advancing a particular theory of January 6th,
00:05:09.040in which, of course, Trump is the criminal who did obstruction and all of this.
00:05:13.160And the point you're making is that if there had been a true insurrection, armed individuals storming the Capitol, perhaps holding it for 48 to 72 hours, actual ties to people in government,
00:05:32.900you'd want a true investigation of this, but you couldn't have someone running that investigation that was already filing a one-sided lawsuit against the person that you decided was the ringleader of the whole thing.
00:05:47.940Right, and which already had a theory of the case fully laid out.
00:05:51.500The J6 is supposed to look at the issue afresh, but, of course, you know, we all know it's a joke.
00:06:45.760Well, you know, the Department of Homeland Security was set up in the aftermath of 9-11 for this war on terror,
00:06:51.840which I think, at best, has mixed results.
00:06:54.580But Benny Thompson came out very early on as the DHS's reliable stooge
00:06:59.580and pushed all these sort of Patriot Act-type proposals coming through DHS.
00:07:05.600And I just find it very interesting, given what we've recently learned about the DHS, its role in censorship of Twitter,
00:07:13.740its role in censorship of the Internet more broadly, its obsession with censoring misinformation on three different things.
00:07:21.640On COVID, on election integrity, and on January 6th.
00:07:30.240You know, Darren, since we're on the subject of the DHS, and, you know, when we look at the timeline of the Twitter files that have come out,
00:07:38.420we have to remember that the Twitter situation with FBI and DHS, that was October 2020.
00:07:46.100Then the preferred candidate of the national security state enters the White House.
00:07:53.100They take over DHS, the apparatus there.
00:07:56.140And the very first thing they attempt to do is erect this organization within DHS, a law enforcement organization,
00:08:03.920not just, but an organization like the FBI that straddles both intel and law enforcement, law enforcement powers.
00:08:10.520And they attempted to create a program called the Disinformation Governance Board.
00:08:16.320And it was going to be run by our good friend, Nina Yankovic.
00:08:21.260And now, I gave a speech earlier today where I said, you know, I made a MyPillow joke,
00:08:27.200and I said, Nina, if you're staying up at night, I've got a way to help with that.
00:08:31.740But, Darren, do you have a message for Nina?
00:08:33.880Because she was so excited about being named to the Department of Homeland Security.
00:08:38.340She leaked her own hiring to Politico because she wanted someone to know about it.
00:08:44.260But it turned out that after I exposed it and you exposed her background, she had to resign in utter disgrace.
00:08:52.520And is it possible that she's just sitting at home right now listening to us,
00:08:57.520perhaps spinning some moaning Myrtle records, sipping her wine?
00:09:02.660What can we tell her at this Christmas season?
00:09:04.640You know, for someone like Nina, and I've become, unfortunately, familiar with a variety of these sort of disinformatrix-type figures.
00:09:15.420And I'd have to say, like, she's probably the more personal of the bunch.
00:09:20.000At least when she started out, there was sort of a light aspect to her personality.
00:09:24.880She got heavier as things went on in a metaphorical sense.
00:09:30.100But it's really just the clownishness of her choice as the head of the disinformation governance board.
00:09:37.540It was too ridiculous even for clown world America.
00:09:41.580It was too ridiculous even for this ridiculous country.
00:09:45.420Even clown world rejected Nina Yankovic.
00:13:14.840But it's what they do to the Twitter executives, who, yesterday we find out, were given top-secret interim clearance by the federal government
00:13:22.120in order to look at some files where they said, we couldn't find any ties between this laptop and the Russian government.
00:13:30.400So we just told them that it was a Russian government operation.
00:13:34.120We put out a statement of 51 national security officials, and they went along with it, even though we had no evidence whatsoever.
00:13:41.520It's straight from the pages of videocracy.
00:13:44.180But Darren, my question for you is, it's not necessarily the fact that they lied, but why is it, why not, say, the Iranian government?
00:14:57.640But, no, the question of why the obsession with Russia, it really gets down to the fact that there are factions within what we call the deep state in the intelligence community.
00:15:08.420And this goes all the way back to our reporting on the color revolution issues, that there's a certain faction of the intel community called the Atlanticists, whatever you want to think.
00:15:19.080They're associated with groups like the Atlantic Council and so forth.
00:15:22.460And George Soros is a major figure in this sort of constellation.
00:15:28.600Which, and by the way, just for folks' background, I know I said we weren't going to explain the references, but when we look at these operations, this is exemplified through the Five Eyes Intelligent Sharing Network.
00:15:41.260And go look, who is Christopher Steele, an agent of?
00:16:47.600Whether you want to focus on Russia, focus on China.
00:16:50.360And, you know, the Atlanticist group is definitely focused on Europe and favors a particular sort of influence model that I've described as the color revolution model.
00:17:00.740And that model is particularly tailored to the phenomenon that we call wokeness because it requires mass mobilization.
00:17:08.540It requires exacerbating certain cultural and ethnic cleavages within societies and mobilizing on that basis, leveraging the media and NGOs.
00:17:17.920And so it's really important, I think, to understand the sociology and the ideology of this particular faction because it's played such a key role.
00:17:28.380Well, and by the way, to piggyback on that, you know, we talk about the Orange Revolution in Ukraine.
00:17:34.300We talk about the Maidan as a color revolution.
00:17:43.320But I think one thing that we need to do a better job of is explaining that what we experienced domestically in 2020 is a textbook color revolution.
00:17:53.680From top to bottom, they used the story of George Floyd to rile and inflame the masses.
00:18:04.420They, in conjunction with lockdowns and psychological operations, and Matthias Desmond talks about mass formation, all of this was done.
00:18:14.360And the EIP and Norm Eisen brag about this in Time magazine.
00:18:39.160The same color revolution professionals.
00:18:41.260The people like Norm Eisen, who literally wrote the book on color revolution called The Playbook.
00:18:46.380There's people like Michael McFowl, who was the color revolution, you know, in charge of Russia.
00:18:53.540There are, you know, people like Anne Applebaum, who happens to have been a member of the Integrity Initiative UK cluster, I believe.
00:19:00.760And all of these people, it's the same cast of characters.
00:19:03.100And so it's one thing if they use the same tactic, but you notice the same cast of characters.
00:19:07.820And part of that is just they viewed the emergence of Trump in 2016, the preceding Brexit phenomenon, as equivalent threats.
00:19:21.200Populism as an equivalent threat to the so-called authoritarian threats that they saw in Eastern Europe.
00:19:27.220And they deployed the exact same mechanisms and tools to suppress the energies associated with the Trump movement and other populist movements domestically that they did against, you know, pick your, pick your, you know, Eastern European, quote unquote, authoritarian that they went after.
00:19:45.860Same people, same playbook, same tactics.
00:19:48.580And you see that in the recent news with the J6 committee and the pedigree of that charge of this third impeachment goes all the way back to Norm Eisen.
00:19:57.640And there's nobody more decorated than Norm Eisen in terms of lawfare efforts against Trump.
00:20:02.520He's literally the key hatchet man, the key figure in all of these operations against Trump.
00:20:09.740So with that, we've got a couple of minutes left here.
00:20:17.240Darren, if asked by, and, you know, we'll find out who the speaker is here soon enough, and the committee chairs, and I just hope they're strong, right?
00:20:27.600That's what I keep saying to everybody.
00:20:29.220If asked, would you be willing to keep the January 6th committee open on the contingency that they named the chief inquisitor you?
00:20:41.220I mean, I am a big fan of keeping the committee, but actually having it serving the purpose that it should serve, which is to get to the bottom of January 6th.
00:20:50.660And there are very specific items I've been calling for.
00:20:54.040We've done a lot of reporting on the pipe bomb issue.
00:21:07.540But that actually illustrates an important point and something that people who want to do something good, but maybe they're more on the cowardly side should think about than GOP.
00:21:17.280You don't need to go full revolver news and say the dirty word Fed's erection to say, I want to find out who the pipe bomber is.
00:21:27.240You don't have to say, Darren Beattie was right about January 6th to say, whoever it was, this person planted explosive devices outside the Democrat national headquarters, and we want to find out who this person is, whether they're Republican, whether they're Democrat, whoever they are.
00:21:42.800This was a terrorist operating on January 5th, January 6th, and we are law and order people.
00:21:50.520It doesn't take any political courage to say that, and that at the very, very least, I expect incoming Congress to do that.
00:21:57.820I mean, you don't need the meemaws of Alaska and Alabama and the peaceful people who were walking within the lines.
00:22:09.940It seems like those are the ones that the FBI is much more interested in going after.
00:22:14.120People locked up for two years now in some cases with no trial.
00:22:18.660Though I am told that they have tablets while they're in there, and they are able to actually, on Pluto, watch Real America's Voice and watch The War Room and watch everything.
00:22:28.060So, you know, we're praying for you this Christmas season, but also, what, bottom line, what is the most important thing that the new Congress could do going forward?
00:22:42.560I know it's a complicated question, but what would you like to see out of the new Congress to fight back against any of this?
00:22:48.680Well, I mean, most broadly speaking, I support what I think David Sachs just said on Twitter.
00:22:55.480It's like, we need a new church committee.
00:22:57.440Broadly speaking, we need a new church committee.
00:22:59.920But more specifically, we need an investigatory committee like the January 6th committee to get to the bottom of very specific issues.
00:23:07.580And I've been on record saying the two smoking guns of January 6th are Ray Epps and the pipe bomb.
00:23:13.160And there are very specific actions that this Congress can take in terms of availing itself of subpoena power to get to the bottom of those two issues.
00:23:21.100And you've done the work that shows there are hours of videotape that the FBI has.
00:23:27.160They've doctored footage that's been released.
00:23:33.560Just give us the chain of custody of the DNC pipe bomber footage and the full, raw, and unedited footage, and let's start from there and see where it goes.
00:23:40.760I guarantee you it will lead to very, very dark places.
00:23:44.560But as they say, the cliche, but it's true, sunlight is the best disinfectant, and it's time for a reckoning.