Human Events Daily with Jack Posobiec - January 19, 2023


EPISODE 372: DAVOS DAY THREE


Episode Stats

Length

25 minutes

Words per Minute

149.09071

Word Count

3,804

Sentence Count

245

Misogynist Sentences

6

Hate Speech Sentences

3


Summary

Alec Baldwin has been charged with involuntary manslaughter in the death of Helena Hutchins, and we continue our coverage of Day 3 of the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, with a look at the tensions between China and the West.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Hashtag justice for Helena Hutchins, Alec Baldwin has been charged with two counts of involuntary manslaughter in Santa Fe, New Mexico.
00:00:11.340 We're going to get into that and everything else that's going on, as well as continuing our coverage day three of the World Economic Forum, day three of Davos.
00:00:20.820 We're going to break everything down from transhumanism to transnational control of our governments and our societies.
00:00:27.820 But I also want to remind you that there is still time, still available, slots open, for you to sign up for the Poso Daily Brief.
00:00:35.160 What's the Poso Daily Brief?
00:00:36.240 Well, it's very simple.
00:00:37.580 Read what I read when I do show prep.
00:00:39.840 I'm constantly reading.
00:00:40.980 I'm constantly consuming information, constantly consuming reporting.
00:00:44.040 But I know that there's no one place where it's all aggregated.
00:00:47.400 Well, now there is.
00:00:48.260 You can get one email sent directly to your inbox every day, and that's called the Poso Daily Brief.
00:00:52.340 You just go to humanevents.com slash Poso, humanevents.com slash Poso, sign up, and you will get it completely free, delivered to you every single day.
00:01:01.260 The Poso Daily Brief.
00:01:02.700 Read what I read.
00:01:04.060 Let's get into it.
00:01:04.980 Who will really command the fourth industrial revolution and its technology like artificial intelligence?
00:01:23.260 What's your sense of who's best placed at this time to lead the world into the fourth industrial revolution?
00:01:30.400 Because you pretty much created this term.
00:01:32.900 We're seeing the kind of technological strides that China has made with Huawei, with the 5G technology.
00:01:39.240 Do you believe that this could potentially be China's time once again?
00:01:43.700 We should make here, again, let's say, a differentiation.
00:01:50.360 On the one hand, we have state capitalism.
00:01:55.240 On the other hand, we have shareholder or private capitalism.
00:01:58.860 So it's a clash between two systems.
00:02:02.260 I believe that state capitalism in the short term provides certain advantages because you can mobilize in a concentrated way a lot of resources to reach a specific objective.
00:02:20.540 But I believe that the future is not state capitalism or shareholder capitalism.
00:02:27.540 The future is what I call stakeholder capitalism, which is combined with the social responsibility.
00:02:38.440 Ladies and gentlemen, welcome aboard today's edition of Human Events Daily.
00:02:42.660 Today is January 19th, 2023.
00:02:45.600 What you heard there, Klaus Schwab.
00:02:49.280 So we're in day three of Davos, Davos, Switzerland.
00:02:54.480 Klaus Schwab, that's a clip from him explaining the different systems that we've seen before between China and the West.
00:03:03.120 Let me break down what he's explaining to you.
00:03:04.680 He's saying the China system is state capitalism, whereas he's saying in the West, you have a system of private capitalism, which, of course, is obviously not true.
00:03:17.440 The government plays a massive role in our economy and it has for decades.
00:03:22.060 Some would say even all the way back to the creation of the Federal Reserve, our central bank.
00:03:26.800 But what Klaus Schwab says there that's so interesting for us that we all need to take note of is that at first he says it would seem that the two systems are clashing because they're different.
00:03:38.980 But then he says what will what will win over.
00:03:42.180 In the end, and what we're moving towards, in his view, is an era of stakeholder capitalism, stakeholder capitalism.
00:03:52.040 What does this mean, stakeholder capitalism?
00:03:54.040 This means, boys and girls, a connection and a merger between the two systems.
00:04:02.600 And the World Economic Forum is positioning itself and has positioned itself for years to be the point of that merger.
00:04:11.620 That's why when we had Savannah Hernandez yesterday and she went and did those great man on the street interviews where she was asking, why can't we talk about Taiwan?
00:04:19.960 Why are we only allowed to talk about Ukraine?
00:04:22.660 Why are we allowed to demonize Russia?
00:04:24.880 But we're not allowed to talk about China.
00:04:27.200 We're not allowed to talk about Taiwan.
00:04:29.520 Why aren't we allowed to talk about these things?
00:04:31.400 And there was a delegate, an official delegate to the World Economic Forum who said to Savannah Hernandez, I'm not allowed to talk about that.
00:04:40.980 I'm not allowed to talk about it.
00:04:42.980 And here's why.
00:04:44.240 Because what we're seeing is a merger between the systems of the West and the Chinese Communist Party.
00:04:51.620 They're seeking to implement their model, their model of control and power across the West and across all of our countries.
00:04:58.240 So Schwab realizes that he can't just come out and say that.
00:05:03.200 So what he's got to call it, he's got to use these fancy phrases, phrases like the Great Reset, which if you notice the phrase, the Great Reset has been completely dropped this year.
00:05:13.760 After, when I came to Davos last year, and I was detained at gunpoint by the World Economic Forum police, and I'm going to call them that because that's what their badge says.
00:05:23.060 In fact, that's what their badges this year say as well.
00:05:25.920 Go look at Masako.
00:05:26.880 Go look at SAV.
00:05:27.700 They've all got photos of this.
00:05:30.100 And by the way, how incredible has Masako's coverage been of the World Economic Forum as well?
00:05:35.560 So really have to just give her a huge shout out.
00:05:38.340 She came on the show right before, literally, as she was flying to Davos.
00:05:43.040 We had her on the show.
00:05:44.060 We talked about the CCP's rise in Japan.
00:05:46.520 She flies to Davos all by herself, and she's been absolutely killing it.
00:05:50.900 Confronts Klaus Schwab directly.
00:05:53.820 Confronts him directly.
00:05:54.540 The only person so far who's been able to do that.
00:05:57.480 So huge shout out to Masako as well as everybody else who's covering this event, who's out here.
00:06:02.840 What do we need to explain?
00:06:03.780 Schwab realizes that terminology is key.
00:06:08.900 That's why he's throwing out the phrase polycrisis.
00:06:11.120 We have to face the polycrisis.
00:06:12.940 We have to create a new system of stakeholder capitalism.
00:06:15.840 What does stakeholder capitalism mean?
00:06:18.000 It's exactly what the World Economic Forum does.
00:06:21.300 They bring together leaders of business, BlackRock, Blackstone, Vanguard.
00:06:28.200 Then they bring together leaders of government.
00:06:34.520 This sort of Davos model where you have a Biden and a Trudeau that are running your economy, that are running your government.
00:06:41.980 Now, Jacinda Ardern, who had been one of the greatest accolades of the World Economic Forum around the world, she's just resigned.
00:06:50.040 She's going to go work on her teeth.
00:06:51.440 Maybe she can afford a pair of braces now after being in government for five years.
00:06:54.600 Hopefully she can, because even though Klaus Schwab, another guy, by the way, I'd put him as another candidate front of the line for orthodontics.
00:07:02.400 What is it about globalists and not having good teeth?
00:07:05.520 I don't know.
00:07:06.640 But here's my point.
00:07:07.340 Even Hunter Biden could at least afford a pair of veneers.
00:07:09.760 That's all I'm saying.
00:07:10.680 But then again, we know what Hunter Biden did to be able to afford that.
00:07:14.960 They want to institute a policy whereby it's organizations like the World Economic Forum that kind of set the agenda for the entire world.
00:07:25.580 They come in with transhumanism, digital surveillance, quantifying and measuring how you live your life.
00:07:36.740 Remember, carbon footprint.
00:07:38.560 Why do we all know that phrase, carbon footprint?
00:07:40.780 Why do we even think about that phrase?
00:07:42.960 Because this is going to go towards your social credit score.
00:07:46.360 And we already have credit scores here in the West.
00:07:48.740 It's called your ESG score.
00:07:50.300 That's why these companies all throughout Wall Street are now enforcing things like critical race theory, carbon footprints, carbon quotients, et cetera, et cetera.
00:07:59.360 By the way, another thing that you're not going to hear Elon Musk talk about too much because Elon Musk has received and made a lot of money, billions of dollars on the basis of electric vehicles and having this ESG score.
00:08:14.040 In fact, going back to Masako, she published a video of someone saying that they weren't allowed to have electric vehicles, EVs, at the World Economic Forum because they were dangerous.
00:08:23.180 And then Elon responded to Masako on that specific comment.
00:08:27.840 So we have to understand what's going on here.
00:08:31.380 These are decisions that are being made.
00:08:33.760 They want to implement the China model.
00:08:36.380 They want organizations like the World Economic Forum to be the face of this.
00:08:40.200 They're not the ones making the decisions.
00:08:41.720 They're not the ones calling the shots.
00:08:42.900 Klaus Schwab is no billionaire.
00:08:44.820 They're a PR firm.
00:08:46.980 And as we're looking at things right now, we look at the escalations in Taiwan.
00:08:51.600 We look at NATO forces now sending tanks.
00:08:54.220 German tanks might be rolling through the Ukraine.
00:08:57.440 Yeah, I think there's some history behind that one.
00:08:59.500 This is how they're moving our world into a new system of what they call multipolarity, but what really is going to be a loss of sovereignty for the United States and every nation that falls under their umbrella and is enwrapped by their dirty tentacles.
00:09:18.440 This is a major, really significant finding here.
00:09:25.560 When you talk about Hannah Gutierrez-Reed, for starters, she was just 24 years old.
00:09:31.180 It was her second time serving as an armorer on a movie set.
00:09:35.860 And she has said all along through her attorney that this was simply Alec Baldwin's fault, point blank that he pulled the trigger.
00:09:43.380 Of course, you know, in that now famous, infamous interview that Alec Baldwin did with George Stephanopoulos, he denied, he disputed ever pulling the trigger.
00:09:54.120 The FBI has now said that based on their findings that they have concluded that the gun otherwise would not have fired.
00:10:01.380 Now, in recent months, Alec Baldwin has filed cases against, lawsuits against the crew, including Hannah Gutierrez-Reed, saying that it was their fault, that a live round should never have made its way onto the set.
00:10:16.900 And so he has said, really, that he's been a victim in all of this.
00:10:21.540 Hannah Gutierrez-Reed is also filing a suit against the prop company, saying that they had given live rounds in addition to the dummy.
00:10:29.300 So lots of finger pointing here.
00:10:31.260 But in the end, the district attorney's office saying that Hannah Gutierrez-Reed and Alec Baldwin should face criminal charges all along that they had said this could be an accident or it could be criminal or it could be both.
00:10:45.280 And now it seems that they're coming out, rendering a decision.
00:10:48.540 15 months.
00:10:51.120 It's been 15 months since Alec Baldwin shot and killed Helena Hutchins, the director of photography and cinematographer for the film Rust.
00:11:04.200 As a producer, Alec Baldwin himself was one of the people putting together the movie.
00:11:10.560 She worked for Alec Baldwin.
00:11:12.920 She was a staffer.
00:11:15.320 He shot and killed her.
00:11:16.660 Now, we don't have any evidence that he did this intentionally.
00:11:23.620 But we also have yet to see the full footage of what exactly went happened and what exactly went down on that set in Santa Fe, New Mexico in October of 2021.
00:11:35.480 We know it was a long day.
00:11:37.300 We know that Alec Baldwin was getting irritated.
00:11:39.600 We know how Alec Baldwin gets when he gets irritated.
00:11:44.000 He gets upset.
00:11:45.040 He snaps.
00:11:48.080 And here we are 15 months later.
00:11:50.640 And he's been charged with two counts of involuntary manslaughter, one of which includes a recklessness charge and a modifier because of the use of a firearm, of a handgun in this case.
00:12:04.040 Human Events Daily has told you from day one that Alec Baldwin is criminally liable here.
00:12:10.340 We also explained that when Special Prosecutor Reeb was appointed and that the New Mexico government was petitioned for further and advanced budget because they knew they were going to be going into litigation and prosecution of, obviously, a high-profile Hollywood actor with more than substantial resources.
00:12:28.720 That they would need as much budget as they could get for this.
00:12:33.440 There's a political angle here, not just the obvious political angle of Alec Baldwin being an arch-liberal, someone who routinely went on Saturday Night Live, was a point man to make fun of Trump, to attack him and lampoon him on SNL.
00:12:47.320 But there's also the local politics angle, and we need to get into that because New Mexico as a state has been trying to establish itself as a place where Westerns can be filmed and to attract more Hollywood business.
00:13:02.200 So imagine the amount of political pressure that the governor and the state legislature was putting on this DA's office to tell them, look, we want there to be an open door for Hollywood, and now you're going to go around and charge one of Hollywood's biggest stars the first time they come into our state?
00:13:18.420 See, neo-Westerns, because of Yellowstone, 1883, 1923, some of these other shows, have really been going through something of a rebirth lately.
00:13:26.480 And so there's some of the hottest commodities out there, and New Mexico wants to get in on that.
00:13:32.200 But here's the problem.
00:13:34.560 Alec Baldwin shot and killed his staffer.
00:13:38.080 And so the question becomes, is the law enforcement and the justice system of the state of New Mexico going to allow people to come into their state and shoot and kill members of their own staff while they're there?
00:13:54.680 The other two massive shows that were just filmed in New Mexico, of course, Breaking Bad and Better Call Saul, two of the most successful TV series of the past decade.
00:14:02.200 But I don't think anyone ever got shot and killed, at least not when it wasn't on, you know, part of the show.
00:14:09.640 So we need to look at this situation clearly, because that ABC clip that we just played for you actually left something out.
00:14:19.560 The assistant director in this case has already pled guilty.
00:14:23.940 He took a plea deal.
00:14:25.520 What does that mean?
00:14:27.100 He's getting six months probation, negligent handling of a firearm.
00:14:30.700 Okay, slap on the wrist.
00:14:33.540 But here's what they're not telling you.
00:14:36.260 There's no way that he got a plea deal like that without having to agree to testify against Alec Baldwin at trial.
00:14:46.800 Now, the assistant director will testify against Baldwin.
00:14:51.120 Those interviews that Baldwin did with George Stephanopoulos, those stupid, idiotic, egotistical interviews that he did will be dissected, where he admits that he had firearms training, where he admits that he's worked with guns for years, which you already know, on set.
00:15:07.920 Prosecutors don't even need to pull that stuff, certificates and training dates and cycles and instructors, they don't need to.
00:15:14.760 Why?
00:15:15.280 Because they have it in his own words.
00:15:18.280 And all of this will be played for the jury.
00:15:20.680 Now, if Alec Baldwin were smart and not an egotistical maniac, when this happened, he would have opened up his checkbook and gone to the now widowed husband, widower, and said, how much do you want?
00:15:33.640 But instead, Alec Baldwin has been countersuing the family, claiming that he himself is a victim, saying that he shouldn't be financially liable, again, for shooting and killing his staffer, and that he shouldn't even have to pay any money.
00:15:52.860 He offered to them, let me finish making the film, and I'll pay you from the proceeds of the film.
00:15:59.120 So, that's the level of ego that Alec Baldwin has.
00:16:02.660 Tell the house, man, you killed somebody's wife.
00:16:05.600 You killed somebody's mom.
00:16:09.040 No one's above the law.
00:16:10.780 I believe in that.
00:16:12.420 But I also want everyone to know that from a basic standpoint of gun safety, firearm safety, and law, criminal justice, there's no such thing as an actor exemption.
00:16:25.900 If someone hands you a firearm, if someone hands you a gun, and tells you it is unloaded, I don't care if it's your mom or your dad, I don't care if it's your best friend, I don't care if it's the Pope, you open it up, if it's a revolver, drop the clip, you know, if it's a handgun, and you check.
00:16:45.760 You verify every single time yourself.
00:16:48.480 Halena Hutchins would be alive today if Alec Baldwin, Hannah Gutierrez-Reed, and the assistant director had done their jobs.
00:16:59.100 None of them did their jobs.
00:17:01.080 And that's why they've all been charged.
00:17:02.760 That's why one of them has already pled guilty.
00:17:06.060 And that's why in a just society, you would also receive guilty verdicts for both of them afterwards.
00:17:12.480 So, Alec Baldwin, congratulations.
00:17:16.480 There is a high, high probability that you will see jail time because of this.
00:17:21.040 Please state your name for the record and the party you are.
00:17:51.040 Thank you, Judge Reyes, and may please the court.
00:17:58.040 Judge Cahill specifically answered what you heard today about the security concerns and the barbed wire and the like.
00:18:05.100 What he said is, and this is quoted in our brief at page 16, that having the trial at the Hennepin County Government Center would be safer and reassure the jury and make them more impartial, not less, because the security could be folded into a general security over the city.
00:18:24.640 And even if you had trial in some other place in Minnesota, in a smaller venue, he said the security would stand out and you'd have the same fears of civil unrest there.
00:18:34.580 So, I posted something online yesterday, and I think it's been enough time.
00:18:42.560 I think people need to just hear this plainly.
00:18:47.640 And we covered the trial of Derek Chauvin day in, day out.
00:18:51.240 I covered every single minute of it.
00:18:53.920 And I'm just going to come out here and say something as plain as I can.
00:18:59.260 Derek Chauvin did not murder George Floyd.
00:19:04.560 Derek Chauvin, the police officer, did not murder George Floyd.
00:19:09.420 We as a country need to have a system of criminal justice.
00:19:15.980 We do.
00:19:17.800 But we can't have a system of political justice, of woke justice.
00:19:22.980 It was woke justice that put Derek Chauvin behind bars.
00:19:27.740 It was woke justice that got O.J. Simpson out of prison when he killed his ex-wife, nearly chopped her head off, and killed a waiter.
00:19:40.040 This country stands at a precipice right now.
00:19:45.260 Are we going to allow the forces of political correctness, political opinion, public opinion, mob rule, and mob justice to determine the course of our country?
00:19:56.640 Or are we going to live in an ordered society where we can look at facts, we can look at reason, we can use rational argument to determine the outcome of events?
00:20:12.100 We can't redefine murder because we want a police officer to go to jail and because we want hashtag justice for George Floyd.
00:20:22.020 The regime launched a domestic color revolution in 2020 in this country because they wanted to enact domestic change in our country.
00:20:38.920 And they used and exploited the shocking and tragic death of Mr. Floyd as a means to their ends.
00:20:47.900 Derek Chauvin didn't receive a fair trial because here's how a trial like that would go.
00:20:56.180 Was this hold permitted under the Minneapolis police code?
00:21:03.060 Well, yes, it was.
00:21:03.840 In fact, there are training slides.
00:21:05.620 I pulled them up within a day of the video coming out.
00:21:09.620 Shows you exactly how to do that.
00:21:11.780 Number two, what did the autopsy say?
00:21:14.640 The autopsy said there were no evidence of life-threatening injuries.
00:21:18.740 And the autopsy said there was a lethal dose of fentanyl and other drugs in Mr. Floyd's system.
00:21:26.080 So you can call that a lot of things.
00:21:28.540 You can discuss it at length, but you can't call it murder because it's not, it's just not murder.
00:21:34.500 And in addition, when you have a trial like that, not just, and this is where we don't have the whole clip yet, but this is where I would, I would correct something that Chauvin's lawyer just said.
00:21:47.900 Because not only did you have the mob justice outside putting pressure on the jurors.
00:21:54.300 In fact, there was a shooting outside in George Floyd Square.
00:21:58.160 It's what they call it.
00:21:58.720 It's still an autonomous zone to this day.
00:22:00.460 During the trial, people were being shot during the trial of George Floyd while the jurors were driving by.
00:22:06.880 But you also had another juror who was on there.
00:22:09.400 We call him a rogue juror.
00:22:11.700 This is juror 52.
00:22:13.780 Juror 52 was a Black Lives Matter podcaster, a George Floyd supporter, someone who even had ties through his family to the Floyd family.
00:22:25.980 This was someone who lied his way onto the jury and did everything he could to make sure that he was there.
00:22:35.060 And we know that this was a jury that was compromised.
00:22:37.520 We know because of his own statements.
00:22:38.740 We know because of his own podcast that we've looked at.
00:22:40.620 We know specifically that juror 52 would never even considered the fact that Officer Chauvin was, in fact, not committing murder.
00:22:56.300 He was committing an arrest.
00:22:58.620 An arrest of a 6'5 criminal who was on drugs.
00:23:04.760 Derek Chauvin, by the way, 5'9", weighed about 115, maybe 120, with all of his kid on, asks Mr. Floyd to go into the car.
00:23:18.020 He's simply saying, go into the backseat.
00:23:20.360 Floyd struggles.
00:23:21.700 Floyd resists.
00:23:22.880 Please just go back in the car.
00:23:24.760 Floyd starts screaming, I can't breathe, even when nobody's putting any pressure on him other than trying to put him in the back of the car.
00:23:32.940 He starts screaming that at them.
00:23:37.080 We also know that there was fentanyl in the car, but the fentanyl was later not found.
00:23:41.200 Where did that fentanyl end up?
00:23:42.720 We know that on previous occasions, George Floyd and other individuals swallowed fentanyl whole because they didn't want to get caught with it.
00:23:50.560 We also know there was another individual in that car along with Mr. Floyd.
00:23:54.820 Who was that person, you ask?
00:23:56.240 That person was George Floyd's drug dealer.
00:24:02.440 So George Floyd was in a car with his drug dealer.
00:24:06.900 We know there was fentanyl in the car because there were traces of fentanyl found in the car.
00:24:12.080 There were also fentanyl found inside George Floyd during his autopsy.
00:24:15.960 Why was it that George Floyd's drug dealer didn't testify at the trial?
00:24:24.020 Well, we know because we were told.
00:24:27.560 The lawyer for George Floyd's drug dealer, who disappeared this guy, said that he didn't testify because he was worried of being found liable for the death of George Floyd,
00:24:39.740 which is considered a third-degree murder charge in the state of Minnesota.
00:24:46.440 Why?
00:24:48.060 Because if you sell someone enough fentanyl to kill them, and it does kill them, you can be charged with murder in the state of Minnesota.
00:24:58.800 So we pled the fifth.
00:24:59.880 All of that amounts to a complete miscarriage of justice, a takeover of our court and our country by the woke industrial injustice system.
00:25:15.520 And if this appeals court wants to take a stand against that and stand for the rule of law and stand for order and stand for justice, they can make things right.
00:25:25.900 Ladies and gentlemen, as always, you have my permission to lay ashore.
00:25:29.880 Thank you.