EPISODE 511： BIDEN ADMIN. GIVES WIFE OF D.C. U.S. ATTORNEY ALL ACCESS PASS TO WHITE HOUSE
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
169.45288
Summary
Jack Posobiec is joined by Tucker Carlson, Steve Bannon, Charlie Kirk, and many others to speak at the Turning Point Action Action Summit on July 15th and 16th in Tampa, Florida. He also talks about The Sound of Freedom and why it should be the number 1 movie in America on July 4th.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
We are in the fight for America's future and we are assembling a team to fight back.
00:00:08.680
Turning point action this July 15th and 16th is where the assemblage will take place.
00:00:16.140
Donald Trump, Tucker Carlson, Dan Bongino, Steve Bannon, myself, Charlie Kirk, Senator Hawley,
00:00:24.340
Senator Vance, Matt Gaetz, Benny Johnson, Vivek Ramaswamy, Scott Pressler, Mike Lindell,
00:00:43.720
Use promo code POSO and you will get a discount.
00:00:49.880
Don't be coming to me saying, can you get me in after this thing sells out?
00:00:55.380
And I will see you down in Florida this July 15th and 16th for the greatest assemblage of patriots this country has seen since Valley Forge.
00:01:18.060
For every lie they tell, we're going to get in their face and yell two truths.
00:01:23.120
This is Human Events with your host, Jack Posobiec.
00:01:27.360
Evgeny Krogosian is back in Russia, in St. Petersburg, instead of being in exile in Belarus.
00:01:33.300
The majority of Republican primary voters right now say they would be less likely to vote for a candidate who supports funding Ukraine's war effort.
00:01:43.200
Key agencies, officials from the Biden administration now barred from meeting and communicating with social media companies about content on their platform.
00:01:51.800
I think it's safe to say the administration will eventually appeal this.
00:01:56.180
So we are regularly making sure social media platforms are aware of the latest narratives dangerous to public health.
00:02:03.120
I do think that he should consider structural reform of the court.
00:02:07.440
And, you know, I knew that Joe would always be the education president.
00:02:12.760
Well, I hate to say that I think she may be the only person who believes that.
00:02:16.140
In the last couple of weeks, we've had a trans activist burying her breasts.
00:02:20.740
It's like if this were it's like they're running a low rent strip club.
00:02:24.920
President Trump has millions of small donors that invest in him.
00:02:30.560
They aren't big donors, but they go out there and they use their hard earned money to get a leader elected.
00:02:38.340
Today's edition of Human Events with Jack Posobiec.
00:02:43.640
Did you know today is the one year anniversary of the destruction of the Georgia Guidestones or what happened to those Guidestones?
00:02:58.160
We don't actually have the music, but we do have fantastic news.
00:03:02.740
And I have to thank every single person in this audience, every single person within the sound of my voice who chipped in, who stood up, who stood strong.
00:03:13.060
And even if it was a comment, if it was an email to us, or even just a retweet, the sound of freedom hit the number one movie.
00:03:23.840
Number one movie in America on the 4th of July.
00:03:28.480
We said that when this movie came out that it would shock the world.
00:03:33.580
All those YouTubers, all those people with their access journalism, because, oh, I went to the sneak preview, went to the sneak screening, Indiana Jones.
00:03:46.220
They won't say a word about the fact that this film, The Sound of Freedom, beats Indiana Jones at the box office, beat Disney, despite the fact that it's on half the screens.
00:04:00.820
It's on about 2,500 screens to about 4,600 screens.
00:04:06.460
That means the per theater average, okay, if you want to understand how the business works, the per theater average of Sound of Freedom was double, double that of Disney, double that of Mickey Mouse, double that of Kathleen Kennedy.
00:04:34.420
It started with, of course, believers, conservative shows, outlets like Human Events, our work on independent media.
00:04:48.800
This is, and I believe this film is a watershed moment for this issue, for our world.
00:04:58.300
We have decided, my parents, during the show yesterday when we were on here and we were doing Human Events, my parents were actually at the theater watching this film.
00:05:13.500
This is about standing up to the mainstream media.
00:05:24.540
And the pedophiles are seething right now that this film is out there.
00:05:28.060
The pedophiles are seething that this film is the number one in America.
00:05:37.360
When Disney bought Fox Studios, Disney had the rights to this film.
00:05:43.520
Disney, why didn't you want to put out an anti-pedophile movie, Disney?
00:05:49.820
I have a little question for Bobby Iger, for all the folks over there.
00:05:56.260
You could have put it out under Fox Searchlight.
00:06:00.700
But why didn't you want to put out a movie that was anti-pedophile, Disney?
00:06:08.540
Did Disney not want to get behind an anti-pedophile movie?
00:06:20.100
And now, we've got an entire army of people across the country and is now moving across the world.
00:06:42.020
We've got Julie Kelly with a huge scoop coming up for us later in the show.
00:06:48.520
And also, a special message about Turning Point Action.
00:06:51.720
We're going to reveal some news and name some names about what's going on, who's appearing, who's not appearing.
00:06:59.160
I'm always listening to Human Events with Jack Posobiec.
00:07:08.040
Now, I've got to tell you, if I seem a little bit extra, I don't know, energized today, if I seem a little more upbeat, if I seem like I'm a little bit going a bit stronger,
00:07:17.380
that's because what graced my coffee mug this morning was my very first scoop, believe it or not, of Pitch Black Espresso Dark Roast from Blackout Coffee.
00:07:33.260
I'm flying on the pitch back because this stuff really kicks you into high gear.
00:07:41.360
We're going with the patriotic blend, the 1776 Dark Roast.
00:07:44.320
But today, day one of Pitch Black, I think it's going to be Pitch Black all week.
00:07:51.400
So some people like their coffee a little smoother in the morning.
00:07:56.620
And that's how you can, too, with BlackoutCoffee.com.
00:08:00.060
Especially if you've got a job, you've got to get up early.
00:08:06.560
Or if you've got a job, you've got to work overnights.
00:08:10.440
I know exactly how that goes when you're on ship.
00:08:25.120
You're going to love this stuff as much as I do.
00:08:26.840
Now, I want to bring on Mike Davis from the Article 3 Project.
00:08:30.500
Because we have to ask this question about what's happening with the delegate apportionment
00:08:35.620
and in California, some of these other situations.
00:08:38.920
Because we have Richard Barrisson yesterday who was walking us through how there's been
00:08:43.780
this huge debate raging about this new system or potential new system of reapportionment
00:08:51.360
of delegates when it comes to the California primary.
00:08:59.620
Well, there was an email that went out last night after our show to every single member
00:09:07.860
And I'd like to bring Mike Davis on now to explain what the situation is.
00:09:19.240
We know there's been this question of California is now changing their, or it has been changed,
00:09:24.880
right, by the Denver by Gavin Newsom, has moved up California's primary date.
00:09:29.680
That triggers a requirement that they must comply with RNC guidelines for primaries that
00:09:40.400
However, there's a question as to how the actual new rule will be written.
00:09:45.320
And what is the latest update as of last evening?
00:09:49.060
Well, Harmeet Dillon is one of my friends and strong allies with Article 3 Project and
00:09:59.880
Her campaign represent, or excuse me, her law firm represents the Trump campaign.
00:10:06.280
What happened with this RNC meeting is they're trying to comply with the update, because, as
00:10:14.300
you said, Jack, because they moved their primary before March 15th.
00:10:18.100
They have to have, they have to go from a winner-take-all system to a proportional system.
00:10:24.760
But there was some confusion with that where you can still have carve-outs where if you, for
00:10:30.960
example, if a candidate gets 50% more or more of the vote, they can get a winner-take-all.
00:10:36.040
Or if there are candidates who don't get 20%, they don't get any delegates.
00:10:42.340
This is the idea of like a 50% or a 20%, because we were digging into this, Texas, Florida,
00:10:49.600
50%, 20% seems to be kind of a standard that we're seeing in sites that fall under this
00:10:58.400
She's been advocating to have a threshold of 50% winner-take-all, along with that 20% threshold.
00:11:10.560
And this is a proposal that was going to the executive committee, then it has to go to
00:11:14.640
the rules committee, and then it has to go to the full convention.
00:11:22.620
It sounds like, based upon Harmeet's email, that what she's been advocating for, she's
00:11:28.620
And it sounds like she's going to get other members of the committee, the California Republican
00:11:34.220
National Committee board, to go along with what she's been advocating for.
00:11:38.160
My biggest concern has been for people attacking Harmeet.
00:11:50.440
Harmeet is trying to balance where she's representing, her firm is representing the Trump campaign,
00:11:56.560
and she has a fiduciary duty as the national committee woman in California to make sure
00:12:02.200
that the will of California voters is followed here.
00:12:04.660
And she's threading the needle, and she's doing that.
00:12:07.600
So I think people just need to, they need to, I think that before they criticize Harmeet,
00:12:15.100
I would suggest that they read her email and actually pick up the phone and call her.
00:12:23.040
If this, because I read the email, I read through it last night when it came out, I think Laura
00:12:32.440
And in that, there was this discussion of sort of, you know, this idea that there was an artificial
00:12:38.740
timeline that said the rule change had to be in by June, which would be months before
00:12:44.180
before the new, the next meeting of the California GOP, where this could actually be debated with
00:12:51.280
the entire committee there present, as opposed to putting it, pushing it through in June.
00:12:57.360
And then there was this question of, you needed some sort of temporary rule that had to be pushed
00:13:09.880
And I think that there was some misinformation communicated to Harmeet on when things needed
00:13:18.640
And she, she pushed back on that and her email kind of gets, gets to that.
00:13:24.400
The bottom line is, is that Harmeet's position that there's going to be a 50% threshold for
00:13:32.900
And then there's going to be the 20% threshold.
00:13:36.500
It sounds like she's convincing other members to go along with that.
00:13:41.240
And it sounds like that's, what's going to be the California position when this is all
00:13:45.480
said and done, or at least that's what Harmeet is advocating for.
00:13:49.080
So, you know, again, I think people need to cool off on attacking Harmeet and questioning
00:13:55.880
her motives and her loyalty, because it's not fair to Harmeet, who has spent many, many,
00:14:01.460
many years fighting these conservative fights for Donald Trump.
00:14:07.780
She's volunteered thousands of hours of her very valuable time to do this.
00:14:13.460
And people should take a, take, take a step back and actually read her email.
00:14:17.800
And if they have questions still, these self-proclaimed journalists should actually do what journalists
00:14:24.440
And that's reach out to her and ask her these questions before they smear her.
00:14:28.540
Well, and I remember, and of course, I remember Harmeet publicly advocating for President Trump
00:14:33.540
throughout 2020 and also in the aftermath of 2020, when many lawyers ran away from President
00:14:41.460
But there's, there's another question here as well that I have is that Harmeet Dillon,
00:14:45.460
she's not the, the, the California GOP chair that was in Richard Barris was on yesterday.
00:14:49.940
And I think you rightfully pointed out that it's this Jessica Patterson who's actually,
00:14:53.480
obviously Harmeet is more well-known, but Jessica Patterson actually is the chairwoman
00:14:59.800
And Barris said that it's really this Patterson that was pushing that rule change.
00:15:04.200
That also seemed to be what Harmeet was saying in the letter that we saw last night.
00:15:13.620
I look, I actually agree with those who are raising the flag here and saying that this
00:15:18.200
is not right, what they're doing in California.
00:15:20.880
Where, where my disagreement is, is the people who are unfairly attacking Harmeet when she
00:15:26.080
also agrees with us and that she's been advocating this, including within these meetings.
00:15:31.500
And she's the one who's going to actually make this happen if it happens.
00:15:34.700
And she's doing it over opposition from other people on this California GOP board.
00:15:41.120
And so I think people need to understand that Harmeet is not the enemy.
00:15:46.700
You know, her firm's representing Donald Trump.
00:15:48.600
She's not a Trojan horse undermining Donald Trump to the benefit of some other candidate.
00:15:56.020
And that's why I decided over the 4th of July weekend to spend my weekend defending Harmeet
00:16:03.060
And, and, and this really did pop out of, out of nowhere, but I do think, I do think
00:16:06.820
it's important because I remember this and look, I'll, I'll take it on, on the head because
00:16:11.940
look, you know, I'm, I'm already in the January 6th report and all these other reports that
00:16:18.180
It's, it's, it comes down to this when they talk about hashtag stop the steal and that,
00:16:31.520
It was a hashtag that we ran in 2020 hashtag stop the steal.
00:16:44.740
And Jack, why did you tweet stop the steal in September of 2020?
00:16:57.160
Someone asked Jack Pacific from the white house, but tweet off the steal.
00:16:59.980
The very original stop the steal all the way back was not 2018, which by the way, you did
00:17:06.840
see a lot of MAGA people come in on behalf of Ron DeSantis in Broward County in 2018.
00:17:11.860
November, um, was not that it was all the way back at the delegate convention situation,
00:17:19.260
the rules committee of the RNC, the convention in Cleveland in 2016.
00:17:24.920
That was the original stop this deal, which was all about that last minute on this, Mike
00:17:31.800
I mean, I would just, uh, I appreciate what you're doing to get information out there on
00:17:38.260
Uh, I would say that this is going to get sorted out.
00:17:40.680
Harmeet's going to ensure this gets sorted out.
00:17:42.740
And again, people should, uh, people should call Harmeet before they accuse, accuse her of
00:17:49.200
being disloyal or otherwise question her motives.
00:17:51.520
No, and I, and I think that, uh, look, I'll, I'll put it this way.
00:17:58.660
I think that people are right to raise flags about the process, about the system, the personalities
00:18:03.880
involved, but at the same time, that's why we, that's what we do here.
00:18:09.860
That's why I was calling people on both sides of this thing saying, what is the truth?
00:18:18.380
Because I want to ask you about some other stuff coming up after the break here, but
00:18:21.460
I do think that it's so important for us to understand what's happening because people
00:18:28.380
Will the RNC turn into, as Richard Barris said, going for this super delegate system?
00:18:33.480
Could we potentially be pushing on the right to say, this is what turns people off from
00:18:39.160
And so the idea then of keeping the system set up the way the elected members of the
00:18:45.580
party, the voters of the party ultimately being able to decide, that's what I think people
00:18:51.740
And you need to use your power to make sure that stays the way coming up next.
00:18:56.400
All right, Mike Davis, I want to do something a little different here on the show.
00:19:07.080
So next week we've got turning point action, act con, the act con action conference that's
00:19:15.660
And Charlie Kirk just did something that I've never seen him do before.
00:19:21.420
He put out a list of the people, because everybody, whenever there's a turning point event, people
00:19:26.360
say, who's speaking, who's speaking, who's not speaking, who's doing this, who's doing
00:19:31.420
They say like, you know, what, uh, you know, this person was there, this person's not there.
00:19:35.640
What, what rank are they on the, you know, on the seating chart, the, you know, whenever
00:19:39.100
the announcement goes through, he just put out a list of candidates for president that will
00:19:45.360
be arriving that have declined to attend and the people who are still TBD.
00:19:55.160
So let me go through the list with you really quickly here.
00:19:58.300
Trump confirmed Vivek Ramaswamy confirmed Francis Suarez, who is the mayor of Miami confirmed.
00:20:09.480
Mike Pence, Tim Scott, Nikki Haley, all declined.
00:20:26.740
So it seems like, and I haven't spoken to Charlie about this otherwise, it seems like they have
00:20:35.620
Ron DeSantis, I remember, spoke at multiple Turning Point Action events throughout 2022.
00:20:43.420
However, it appears he is not a confirmed speaker for the Turning Point Action Conference, which
00:20:50.360
will be happening next week in West Palm Beach.
00:20:58.500
Tucker, Steve Bannon, myself, et cetera, Dan Bongino.
00:21:03.540
What do you think it says about these candidates either not showing up or not giving a response?
00:21:14.200
Unless there's another West Palm Beach you know of.
00:21:20.380
If you don't have a governor of Florida, maybe you could invite the acting governor of Florida.
00:21:23.880
I mean, it's a head-scratcher to me that DeSantis wouldn't show up to this event, but maybe he doesn't
00:21:32.120
think it's important to go talk to young conservative leaders from all over the country.
00:21:37.860
Yeah, it's strange to me as well, because I'll put it this way, and Charlie has said publicly
00:21:43.500
that he's backing Trump personally because he had made a longstanding promise to Trump.
00:21:48.080
But that being said, a group like Turning Point Action has always tried to sort of keep
00:21:54.280
that balance between all the different angles out there when it comes down to it and to
00:21:59.520
say, basically, look, if there's an event that's going on, we, I mean, obviously, from
00:22:04.380
a perspective, just a pure events promotion perspective, you want as many people there
00:22:09.780
as possible because you want to generate that buzz.
00:22:12.240
You want to generate that spirit of competition.
00:22:15.920
You know, who gets cheered, who gets booed, who gets the applause lines, that type of
00:22:22.900
So the idea, because this is how, I mean, really, this is what put CPAC on the map, which
00:22:28.120
was the idea that every candidate had to go through CPAC, and then they had the CPAC straw
00:22:34.120
That, I would say, used to be, and in many cases still is, one of the big standards onto going
00:22:43.600
Obviously, this year, it's a little bit different because we don't have an incumbent, but we do
00:22:47.280
have a former president, an immediate former president running.
00:22:56.620
I think Governor DeSantis has been an outstanding governor, but I've just been very underwhelmed
00:23:04.900
And if Vivek is going to this event and Governor DeSantis is not, then it's hard for me to
00:23:11.460
understand why the DeSantis people are finding it puzzling that Vivek is becoming a quick
00:23:18.720
competitor for the number two slot in the Republican primary.
00:23:22.020
I think this is a big mistake by DeSantis for not RSVPing to this event in his home state,
00:23:29.400
where he is the governor, with these key conservative influencers from all over the country, especially
00:23:35.700
And to be clear, by the way, Governor DeSantis spoke at the event last year.
00:23:43.700
We had it in Tampa last year, not in West Palm, but it's essentially the same event with
00:23:48.620
Turning Point Action that he spoke at last year.
00:23:55.740
I would think that he would again if he showed up.
00:23:59.180
And I guess the question then becomes, you know, and I just got to say it, all right?
00:24:04.720
One of the reasons that Vivek Ramaswamy is now, and you saw the Echelon Insights poll
00:24:09.700
that came out yesterday, which is an A, you know, A, A minus rated poll, that Vivek is now
00:24:15.720
within striking distance of number two nationwide, is because he's not campaigning as an anti-Trump
00:24:26.280
In some instances, it seems like he's actually campaigning as also MAGA, but then willing
00:24:32.540
to talk about things from a new perspective, be more innovative about different issues.
00:24:41.780
He's not attacking MAGA voters or the MAGA candidate.
00:24:46.740
He showed up down there in Florida for the classified Mar-a-Lago case, right?
00:24:54.000
This question about the classified documents that you and I have talked about at great length.
00:25:00.860
We had you on that day when President Trump was indicted, but Vivek Ramaswamy was the only
00:25:07.000
And I have to say, I think MAGA voters are taking notice of it.
00:25:21.660
I think Governor DeSantis is an outstanding governor.
00:25:25.620
It's just a head scratcher to me that he's running such a bad presidential campaign.
00:25:31.840
And when I see Vivek quickly going into the number two position, I think maybe the DeSantis team
00:25:39.180
may need to regroup and think maybe we made a mistake by jumping in against Trump this time.
00:25:47.360
I guess he'll be he'll just turn 50 when 2028 rolls around.
00:25:52.020
I think Governor DeSantis maybe should cut his losses and drop out, endorse Trump and then
00:26:00.400
Well, I think a lot of people have looked at that as well, because and look, I've said this
00:26:06.900
I've said it in on Tim Pool when I do media appearances.
00:26:10.240
I always say, I always say that everybody wants to argue with me about four years, right?
00:26:18.780
We know there's a four year term that's coming up for president, right?
00:26:25.180
But if there were a way for a deal to be struck between the two camps where you work in tandem,
00:26:40.980
Now, I was saying that at the onset of this, obviously, there's a bit more bad blood right
00:26:46.380
But I do think when you look in terms of the movement, we look in terms of the party, when
00:26:49.580
you look in terms of the country, which is obviously what we're hoping to be able to
00:26:54.240
see success for and make great again and all these other things, that you would say a 12
00:26:59.900
year plan is probably a little bit more effective than a four year plan that we're all squabbling
00:27:08.120
I think, like I said, I think Governor DeSantis is the best governor in America.
00:27:12.200
He's, I think he got, I think he just, I think he got into the presidential politics
00:27:21.180
It's very clear he's not ready by the, by, by his very underwhelming presidential campaign.
00:27:27.100
I think he can salvage his reputation among conservatives, particularly Trump conservatives
00:27:32.400
by finding a way to gracefully bow out, endorse Trump and save himself for 2028.
00:27:40.540
Well, and this is why, and as we were talking about in the previous segment, this is why the
00:27:45.240
delegate apportionment matters, because if you have delegates that are then being apportioned
00:27:51.180
in different ways, when you go through some of these early states, it actually extends
00:27:56.700
what is, what seems to be a very contentious primary, which would extend it far beyond what
00:28:03.920
So instead of this thing being done by the end of February, super Tuesday, it now rolls into
00:28:09.940
Now you're getting closer to the convention and all of this being done in a presidential
00:28:16.760
We are only what, uh, 14 months away from the election, 14, 15 months away from the election
00:28:24.440
So the longer people keep this fight up, the more money is spent, the more energy is spent.
00:28:31.200
I think this is why these, and it may sound arcane, you know, the, the threshold of the
00:28:36.040
20%, the 50%, but it actually matters because I, you and I am sure can see the media writing
00:28:42.660
And the other piece, before I let you go, when I ask you about this, uh, there's this
00:28:48.800
If president Trump is indicted and probably will be for January 6th, if he's convicted
00:28:55.580
by a DC court, which if they, if they hold the trial quickly, I can't imagine that a DC
00:29:01.460
Do you believe that a fight for the 14th amendment then for president Trump, does that go all
00:29:10.060
We only have a couple of minutes, but I want to get your, just your quick thoughts on it.
00:29:13.840
If, if Democrats and DC Republicans and other Trump deranged rhinos think that they are going
00:29:19.040
to overturn the will of the American people through some novel reading of the 14th amendment
00:29:24.820
with this bogus January 6th and insurrection theory, that is absolutely not going to fly
00:29:33.520
So therefore it's not going to fly at the Supreme court.
00:29:39.060
Are we looking at another six, three, do you think five, four, do you think anyone peels
00:29:43.360
I mean, I'm not asking you to read the tea leaves, but Hey, come on, that's your job.
00:29:46.880
I mean, it should be nine to nothing, but you see with these three Democrat Supreme court
00:29:55.000
And so they're going to, if Trump's, if any of Trump is before them, they're going to vote
00:30:06.720
And, but I have to ask you and final minute on this, is it the role of the Supreme court
00:30:11.760
to determine who is able to run for president in America under our system?
00:30:18.240
There, the qualifications are in the constitution.
00:30:22.060
This insurrection theory down in Georgia, both in Georgia and DC is a bogus legal theory.
00:30:32.380
It is actually allowed by the electoral count act of 1887 to object to a presidential election.
00:30:40.240
It's only illegal to object to presidential elections and third world Marxist hell holes.
00:30:45.580
And that seems like that's where the Democrats are trying to take America because they hate
00:30:53.100
Mike Davis in a nutshell, everyone go file Mike Davis, the article three project.
00:30:58.060
He's been calling the shots on this and calling balls and strikes from the very start.
00:31:05.380
All right, folks, we've got Julie Kelly up next because as we look on all of this, we've
00:31:19.060
And I'm telling you, she was the one who called it first for anyone else.
00:31:27.660
Buzzing in my ear about the boring people at your office.
00:31:30.740
I'm trying to listen to the new human events with Jack Pazovic.
00:31:37.780
Very excited to bring on Julie Kelly, who's got a huge scoop for us up on her sub stack.
00:31:54.820
Because I was told every time we hear from Joe Biden that the Department of Justice is
00:32:06.060
He doesn't even know where the Department of Justice is.
00:32:08.260
He doesn't even remember who the attorney general is, which honestly might be true, but
00:32:24.160
So one would have to assume that Fatima Gossgraves, who also is the CEO and president of a very
00:32:30.420
well-funded $100 million nonprofit called the National Women's Law Center, why she has
00:32:37.260
visited the White House now on record 28 times since Joe Biden was elected or became president.
00:32:45.420
Her invitation to the White House increased exponentially, as I write in my piece on my
00:32:52.320
sub-stack, declassified with Julie Kelly, after her husband, Matthew Graves, was confirmed
00:33:01.080
She has attended high-level events with the president, with Dr. Jill, with Kamala Harris.
00:33:07.460
She has met at least on three occasions with one of Kamala Harris's top advisors.
00:33:13.360
Kamala Harris's niece, Mina, is on the board of directors for Fatima Gossgraves' nonprofit.
00:33:23.920
But why is Fatima Gossgraves, when her husband is the lead prosecutor, continuing to round
00:33:29.920
up Trump supporters for a four-hour disturbance that occurred two and a half years ago, criminally
00:33:34.360
charging them, criminally charging people like Steve Bannon?
00:33:37.520
Why has his wife now visited the White House on average once a month since the beginning
00:33:45.600
So I pose those questions in my piece on my sub-stack and suggest that House Republicans,
00:33:51.520
who now want to talk to Matt Graves after the IRS whistleblower said that he declined to prosecute
00:33:58.360
Hunter Biden for tax crimes committed in 2014 and 2015 in Washington, D.C.
00:34:04.040
According to that IRS whistleblower, Matthew Graves made that decision in March of 2022.
00:34:10.260
That month, according to White House visitor logs, his wife visited the White House five
00:34:15.680
Is she discussing this criminal investigation with anyone at the White House?
00:34:19.900
Is this a quid pro quo, a way to reward Matthew Graves for continuing to round up and criminally
00:34:28.680
I think if Matthew Graves sits before a House committee, as Republicans want, they should
00:34:40.220
And this is something where House Republicans clearly have the ability to come in and put
00:34:45.900
pressure and just shine a light on what exactly is going on in this situation.
00:34:49.400
Because, Julie, and as you've reported, we were told again and again that Matthew Graves
00:34:54.020
is completely independent, that the Department of Justice is completely independent.
00:34:58.220
All of these investigations, whether it be Hunter Biden, whether it be Donald Trump, which
00:35:01.980
of course is going to come up in Jack Smith, I want to ask you about that in a minute, but
00:35:05.640
and of course the January 6th defendants and detainees, all of this being done by someone whose
00:35:12.980
wife is making 28 visits to the White House with a full access pass.
00:35:19.800
Look, you know, you know, my wife's been to the White House.
00:35:21.960
She was there when Trump was there, but she wasn't going 28 times.
00:35:24.620
When she was going, she was going with me to, you know, public events or, you know, official
00:35:29.940
It wasn't like she was just going in for these private meetings.
00:35:32.800
And I think that's something that needs to be said as well, that when she's going in,
00:35:36.640
she's not going there for not always going for events like this.
00:35:40.160
They're going for specific meetings with members of the administration.
00:35:45.560
And Fatima Goss-Graves has attended, as I said, events hosted by Joe Biden.
00:35:51.060
In fact, one of them, Jack, that I write about in my piece is she attended what looks like
00:35:56.640
It was the only public event on Joe Biden's schedule, January 6th, 2023.
00:36:01.540
Joe Biden's commemorating the two-year anniversary of what happened on January 6th.
00:36:06.600
He gave away more medals, the presidential citizens medal to what I call the January 6th
00:36:12.620
celebrity cops, people like Michael Fanone, the cop turned CNN contributor, Harry Dunn,
00:36:18.240
Aquilina Gunnell, Daniel Hodges, people who not only are central to promoting the narrative
00:36:25.520
about January 6th, but people, individuals who Fatima Goss-Graves' husband, Matthew, uses
00:36:37.100
He has allowed these very same police officers to give victim impact statements demanding harsh
00:36:42.600
prison sentences for anyone convicted or pleading guilty to attacking police officers.
00:36:49.460
So why is she sitting in the audience for an event on the subject matter that her husband
00:36:56.740
is responsible for, you know, this is the sort of thing that, regardless of where you are
00:37:02.960
on the political spectrum, that sort of quid pro quo, that sort of tight connection between
00:37:09.900
what is supposed to be an independent department of justice and the top officials in the White
00:37:15.380
House, including the president himself, those are, you know, sort of alarming revelations,
00:37:21.560
I think, and it's sort of stunning that the media hasn't found this out themselves, that
00:37:27.220
I was the one to just glance at the White House visitor's log and shockingly saw her name
00:37:35.160
You know, Julie, I made that same comment to somebody earlier today.
00:37:38.660
We were going through some of these questions earlier in the show about the RNC and the delegate
00:37:45.280
apportion process and some of the personalities involved and who ran for what at different times
00:37:51.020
and some of the fault lines there and the personalities.
00:37:54.440
And it really goes to what you just said there, that don't you think that if you, that in a
00:37:59.280
normal world, in a sane world, you know, wouldn't the Washington Post be all over this kind
00:38:04.760
Wouldn't this be the kind of thing that they're actually supposed to be doing on a regular basis
00:38:09.720
instead of doxing Trump supporters and harassing people?
00:38:13.580
This is the sort of actual political peeling back the layers of examining corruption, examining
00:38:19.500
what our government is up to on a regular basis that you wonder, why does it fall to?
00:38:25.420
I mean, I'm very glad, you know, it gives me something to do because I'm not really sure
00:38:30.980
But doesn't it blow your mind that there's no one else out there talking about it?
00:38:35.580
Meanwhile, you've got guys like Ryan Riley who go all in with sedition hunters and now
00:38:42.020
Right, and I mean, there's no doubt that these January 6th reporters know who Fatima Goss
00:38:51.780
They certainly have to understand her access to the White House.
00:38:55.560
I even report that it looks like both Fatima and Matthew Graves attended Biden's 4th of July
00:39:03.460
I mean, this is, at the very least, should be something that the press should be exposing
00:39:11.280
as flying in the face of both the insistence by Joe Biden and certainly by Merrick Garland
00:39:17.820
that his Department of Justice is independent from influence in the White House.
00:39:22.860
And this is proof positive that that simply is untrue.
00:39:27.240
And I'll tell you, since my story posted yesterday, I have heard cricket from January 6th corporate
00:39:33.540
reporters who certainly cover my work and know this and should be alarmed that the lead federal
00:39:39.060
prosecutor, a Biden appointee, that his wife has such access and influence within the White
00:39:47.800
House and what information she might be sending them, what information she might be getting and
00:39:55.180
Now, of course, this is all speculation, but look, when you're talking about the most corrupt
00:39:59.960
Department of Justice in history, when you're talking about unprecedented charges, FBI raids
00:40:06.200
of a former president, bringing criminal charges on ridiculous counts, such as the Espionage
00:40:12.240
Act, and keeping all of this under seal, by the way, there is no one in this Department
00:40:17.900
of Justice or White House who should be trusted.
00:40:21.920
And one man who should be questioned is right there, Merrick Garland, Lisa Monaco, his deputy,
00:40:27.700
and certainly Matthew Graves, about his apparent conduit between him and the Biden White House.
00:40:40.340
This is the same type of revolving door, the same type of personal relationships leveraged into political
00:40:50.080
opportunism and in some and in cases, lawfare, as we saw back during the Obama administration.
00:40:57.480
And you know who it reminds me of? Bruce Orr and Nellie Orr. One had a relationship who
00:41:03.580
was in government. One had a relationship that was outside of government, but was also
00:41:08.400
tied to politics. Isn't it? It's the same. And Julie, you were one of the few, the people
00:41:12.600
who just dug in on it and exposed the way they were able to use this relationship as a go-between
00:41:20.540
for various entities and various interests. Oh, I'm not working with the Department of Justice.
00:41:27.480
We don't work with the DNC. Oh, I work with the DNC. We don't work with the Department of
00:41:30.640
Justice. We're not cloning. Yeah, but you're married. You're married. We can see you're
00:41:34.440
clearly working together. You're clearly talking to each other. It's ridiculous. Julie, we're
00:41:37.860
coming to a break. Can I hold you over? Because I need to go through more of this because I think
00:41:41.720
you're onto it. This is how DC works. It's how they've always been running this stuff. It's been
00:41:46.760
working this way for a long time. But fortunately, we've got folks like the intrepid Julie Kelly
00:41:51.700
to break it down for all of us. When I grew up in the hood, I rolled with bloods. And them boys
00:42:00.380
had a saying. You can't be listening to all that slappy whack, trimatozolitzabam ship, nippy
00:42:06.080
bam bam, like Human Events with Jack Posobiec. All right, back to Human Events, Jack Posobiec. Here
00:42:13.500
we go, guys. So Julie Kelly, when we were in here last, we were just talking about how the
00:42:19.100
oars and now the graves, this DC power couple, right, seems to be working on the left. But
00:42:27.100
there's another DC power couple that's been involved in lawfare, and that's Jack Smith and
00:42:32.780
his wife, isn't it? Tell me about Jack Smith and his wife.
00:42:37.240
So Jack Smith is the special counsel who was appointed by Mayor Garland in November of 2022
00:42:42.620
to give the fake impression that the DOJ was going to be independent related to the investigations
00:42:47.720
into Donald Trump for classified documents and the events of January 6. Jack Smith has
00:42:53.380
a spotty, to put a kindly prosecutorial record. I think he was overturned twice by the Supreme
00:43:00.260
Court. He had mistrials and other political cases. Nonetheless, his wife, Kate, was one of
00:43:06.380
the producers on the documentary for Michelle Obama. It is reported that she also donated
00:43:13.380
to Democrats, I believe even Joe Biden. So here, once again, we have a Democratic power couple
00:43:20.040
put in a huge position of unaccountable authority, by the way, especially Jack Smith, seeing him
00:43:27.080
right there. And so, you know, again, you know, I think Washington, D.C. is not so much a swamp
00:43:35.580
as it is a trailer park, because it just seems like, you know, they swap out partners and swap
00:43:40.720
out offices and swap out, you know, all sorts of interesting locations and partnership, especially
00:43:50.000
when it comes to the Department of Justice, as you pointed out, Bruce and Nelly, or both tied
00:43:54.980
to Glenn Simpson at Fusion GPS, and of course, their good friend, Christopher Steele.
00:44:01.440
Well, and so, Julie, here's what I've got to ask you as well. Number one, okay, was this
00:44:07.600
Fatima Graves, was she the drug dealer that happened to leave that cocaine in the library?
00:44:16.060
I'm going to say no. She does not seem like the sort to me, although I wouldn't be surprised
00:44:22.240
if the Biden's threw her under the bus or anyone to protect, you know, the very likely
00:44:29.700
Oh, come on. We all know that we all know that Hunter just goes in the library to brush
00:44:34.380
up on his Roosevelt, the rough rider, Spanish American word. That's what he was doing in
00:44:38.940
the library. But Julie, in all seriousness, there are a lot of updates going on in the Jack
00:44:44.700
Smith case, or potentially cases against Trump. You've been consistently ahead of the mainstream
00:44:51.700
media. Because I go to Drudge Report to see what the left is talking about. And all of
00:44:56.280
a sudden, they have this big breaking alarm headline, superseding indictment. Donald Trump,
00:45:02.000
they're looking at January 6th and said, wait a minute, Julie Kelly was on the show weeks
00:45:05.060
ago. And that's exactly what she said. You need to be listening to human events and need
00:45:09.480
to be following Julie Kelly on Substack. So break down what is the latest on the superseding
00:45:14.020
indictment and the new redactions or unredactions in the classified intel case?
00:45:19.160
So a couple of things happening in this case, the judge magistrate judge, who, by the way,
00:45:24.140
was the one who signed off on the search warrant, which resulted in the raid of Mar-a-Lago last
00:45:28.660
August, he has allowed for some redactions to be or some of the redactions to be unsealed in
00:45:35.420
that extremely lengthy, highly redacted affidavit that was filed for the search warrant. And this
00:45:41.540
is in response to the press coalition, which is a group of major news organizations who have
00:45:47.620
been filing motions in both this case and also many January 6th cases, wanting some of these sealed
00:45:54.640
orders and some of these sealed hearings to be made public. So this was in response, it was only a
00:46:00.560
partial redaction. So that's happening. Also Judge Cannon, Aileen Cannon, the Trump-appointed judge who
00:46:07.360
did authorize the appointment of a special master in this case because she does not trust the Department
00:46:11.880
of Justice. She authorized a special master in this case last September. Unfortunately, her order was
00:46:18.020
overturned on appeal in December. Nonetheless, she set a very tight trial schedule, hoping to bring this
00:46:25.280
case, or at least that was her original plan, in August. DOJ filed a motion asking to delay the trial
00:46:33.160
until December, really based on the need for security clearances for both Trump and Walt Nata,
00:46:39.640
the man who is charged with conspiring with Trump to obstruct justice, their need to get secured security
00:46:46.660
clearances in the next 45 to 60 days. But Jack, the superseding indictment, and I've watched this
00:46:52.800
over and over in January 6th cases, Jack Smith very likely will file what's called a superseding
00:46:58.680
indictment. And that will either add charges and or add co-defendants in the sitting in the existing
00:47:05.620
criminal indictment, 37 count felony indictment against Donald Trump. That will further delay the
00:47:12.780
trial into 2024, which is what Jack Smith and the Department of Justice wants. On the flip side,
00:47:20.720
we are still sitting here waiting for what will be an even bigger bombshell criminal indictment,
00:47:26.060
a multi-count felony criminal indictment against Donald Trump for the events of January 6th,
00:47:30.600
alongside other co-defendants, probably some of his former attorneys, could be some of his aides,
00:47:37.100
associates in the White House. And that will be the biggest, pose the biggest legal hazard for
00:47:43.040
Donald Trump, because one of those counts could be seditious conspiracy. And when defendants have been
00:47:49.220
charged with seditious conspiracy, the government, this DOJ has sought pre-trial detention for those
00:47:54.840
accused of that crime, which is tantamount to treason.
00:47:59.600
Do you think, do you think they would actually seek, and I'll just be blunt, do you actually think
00:48:04.460
that they would try to put Donald Trump behind bars if they charge him with this?
00:48:08.040
I actually do, because I've seen how this DC, not just this Department of Justice, but I see how the
00:48:15.680
judges on the DC District Court have handled these cases. They have held, Jack, nonviolent defenders,
00:48:23.460
nonviolent protesters behind bars for two years awaiting trial. They do not care about the
00:48:29.620
constitutional rights of these Trump supporters and January 6th protesters. You think all of a sudden
00:48:34.960
the rules are not going to apply. This is the whole point of creating this case law precedent,
00:48:40.360
this precedence for not only holding people behind bars on seditious conspiracy, but obstruction of
00:48:45.640
an official proceeding. That is definitely a felony count that will be brought against Donald Trump.
00:48:51.060
You now have precedent of judges denying release of nonviolent protesters accused of obstruction.
00:49:00.700
So this is the sort of thing that Jack Smith could prepare in a pretrial detention motion presented
00:49:06.980
to one of these DC District Court judges inciting numerous precedents, numerous cases where judges
00:49:14.560
have signed off on pretrial detention, meaning denying bail until the defendant can go to trial.
00:49:20.500
I would not put anything past this DOJ, Jack Smith, or certainly any judge on the DC District Court.
00:49:27.080
The great Julie Kelly. We're just about out of time on the show. Go and follow Julie Kelly on
00:49:32.800
Substack. We want to pump those Substack numbers. We're going to share the link down. Julie,
00:49:37.700
thank you so much for your time today here at Human Events. Thanks, Jack.
00:49:41.880
All right, folks, we have, we knocked it out of the park with Sound of Freedom. Continue
00:49:45.480
going to see that, but we need to keep fighting. Ladies and gentlemen, as always,