Human Events Daily with Jack Posobiec - EPISODE 644： BIDEN JUDGE POISED TO STRIP TRUMP OF PRESIDENTIAL IMMUNITY, RAY EPPS SWEETHEART DEAL

00:00:00.000 I want to take a second to remind you to sign up for the Poso Daily Brief.

00:00:05.420 It is completely free.

00:00:06.760 It'll be one email that's sent to you every day.

00:00:08.640 You can stop the endless scrolling, trying to find out what's going on in your world.

00:00:11.720 We will have this delivered directly to you totally for free.

00:00:14.960 Go to humanevents.com slash Poso.

00:00:17.240 Sign up today.

00:00:18.460 It's called the Poso Daily Brief.

00:00:19.860 Read what I read for show prep.

00:00:21.780 You will not regret it.

00:00:23.400 humanevents.com slash Poso.

00:00:25.060 Totally free.

00:00:25.780 The Poso Daily Brief.

00:00:30.000 This is what happens when the fourth turning meets fifth generation warfare.

00:00:40.100 A commentator, international social media sensation, and former Navy intelligence veteran.

00:00:46.660 This is Human Events with your host, Jack Poso.

00:00:49.480 Deliver us from evil.

00:00:51.280 The massive explosion in downtown Fort Worth, Texas.

00:00:53.720 The fire department is calling this a mass casualty incident.

00:00:56.740 That building is the Sandman Signature Inn.

00:00:59.140 We are told there are at least 11 injuries.

00:01:02.000 German farmers kicked off a week of nationwide protests on Monday.

00:01:06.860 They blocked roads with tractors in response to plans to phase out agricultural subsidies.

00:01:12.120 Why is your government supporting Islamo-Nationalism? 0.92

00:01:15.840 What?

00:01:16.440 You've been mixed in.

00:01:17.600 What are you doing?

00:01:18.920 You're under arrest for assault.

00:01:20.280 What is one, sir?

00:01:20.740 Why are you pushing me?

00:01:22.060 You're under arrest for assault.

00:01:23.240 You're under arrest for assault.

00:01:25.540 How am I under arrest?

00:01:26.460 You bumped into me.

00:01:27.400 You pushed into me.

00:01:28.660 You bumped into me.

00:01:28.940 I was just scrubbing.

00:01:30.040 I've got my credentials here, and you just bumped into me.

00:01:33.160 You're destructing traffic, idiots.

00:01:36.440 You can't do that.

00:01:37.780 That's against the law.

00:01:39.880 Bro, get away from my car.

00:01:41.860 I have a daughter in Brooklyn.

00:01:43.900 Don't touch him.

00:01:45.260 Get out of the way. 0.53

00:01:46.500 I have to get home.

00:01:47.340 A car has crashed into a secure barrier at the Treasury Building side of the White House

00:01:57.860 complex.

00:01:58.600 Secret Service has detained the driver.

00:02:00.620 There are no reports of injuries.

00:02:02.560 What's going to happen in this next election?

00:02:04.600 I am terrified about what could possibly happen.

00:02:08.100 Who we select.

00:02:09.660 Who speaks for us.

00:02:11.140 Who holds that bully pulpit.

00:02:12.720 It affects us in ways that sometimes I think people take for granted.

00:02:17.180 Former Trump campaign staffer Michael Roman and his attorney Ashley Merchant are claiming

00:02:22.680 District Attorney Fonnie Willis had an inappropriate and romantic relationship with the top prosecutor

00:02:28.480 in the case, Nathan Wade.

00:02:30.320 Former President Donald Trump back in D.C.

00:02:32.380 Today he'll be in a courtroom next hour.

00:02:33.940 His lawyer is set to argue that he is immune from prosecution for election interference because

00:02:38.100 he was president at the time of the January 6th insurrection.

00:02:42.740 Ladies and gentlemen, welcome on board.

00:02:44.380 Today's edition of Human Events Daily live from Washington, D.C.

00:02:47.520 Today is January 9th, 2024.

00:02:50.520 And no, Dominic folks.

00:02:52.740 I watched that entire hearing this morning.

00:02:57.200 Donald Trump in the courtroom with these diversity higher judges.

00:03:01.660 And I'm pretty sure that I'd lost my actual brain cells.

00:03:06.700 It was like going into my brain with a hot poker and just jabbing my brain cells directly

00:03:14.660 one after another all through the entire hour.

00:03:17.420 And I went back and listened to it at 2X.

00:03:19.140 Thank God.

00:03:20.520 I think we have a clip.

00:03:21.800 Do we have that clip about the SEAL teams?

00:03:23.560 Do we have the SEAL team clip, guys?

00:03:25.860 Let's play the SEAL team clip.

00:03:28.540 Is that an order SEAL team six to assassinate a political rival?

00:03:33.100 That's an official act in order to SEAL team six?

00:03:35.640 He would have to be and would speedily be, you know, impeached and convicted before the

00:03:41.400 criminal prosecution.

00:03:42.480 What if he weren't?

00:03:43.240 There would be no criminal prosecution, no criminal liability for that?

00:03:47.420 Chief Justice's opinion in Marlborough against Madison and our Constitution and the plain

00:03:53.940 language of the impeachment judgment clause all clearly presupposed that what the founders

00:03:58.200 were concerned about was not.

00:03:59.400 I asked you a yes or no question.

00:04:02.880 Could a president who ordered SEAL team six to assassinate a political rival who was not

00:04:07.900 impeached, would he be subject to criminal prosecution?

00:04:12.140 If he were impeached and convicted first.

00:04:14.340 So your answer is no?

00:04:17.000 My answer is qualified.

00:04:18.020 Yes.

00:04:18.340 There is a political process that would have to occur under the structure of our Constitution,

00:04:21.960 which would require impeachment and conviction by the Senate.

00:04:24.220 But in these exceptional cases, as the OLC memo itself points out from the Department

00:04:28.240 of Justice, you'd expect a speedy impeachment and conviction.

00:04:31.360 But what the.

00:04:31.680 So this is a show trial.

00:04:34.680 I hope everyone understands what that is.

00:04:36.280 And I'm so glad, by the way, that we have this audio, that we actually have a recording

00:04:40.540 of it so everyone can hear how utterly ridiculous and uninterested in the truth of how our system

00:04:47.520 operates.

00:04:48.460 These people are.

00:04:50.220 These are your judges, folks.

00:04:53.260 These are the people that decide whether or not you go to prison.

00:04:57.060 These are the judges that have been locking up Gen 6 defendants. 1.00

00:05:01.840 All right.

00:05:02.040 Now, I know I understand this is the appellate level, but when they appeal, this is where

00:05:05.540 it goes to.

00:05:06.860 Most of them come from the D.C.

00:05:08.440 circuit to begin with.

00:05:09.580 This is how they think.

00:05:10.660 This is how they operate.

00:05:11.960 Although perhaps I'm saying think and I'm going a bit far when I say that because I don't

00:05:18.820 think there's a lot of thinking going on between the earlobes right there.

00:05:24.740 No, instead, what you're getting is this gotcha contest of what if he ordered CO Team 6 to

00:05:33.680 assassinate a political opponent?

00:05:35.660 Well, he didn't do that.

00:05:37.960 Barack Obama, by the way, actually did assassinate a U.S. citizen.

00:05:41.960 But you're not going to talk about that because nobody's ever going to bring him up on charges

00:05:46.500 for something like that.

00:05:48.560 Republicans certainly aren't even going to impeach him.

00:05:50.140 No, we have a situation where you have full throated race communists up on the bench in 1.00

00:05:57.660 Washington, D.C.

00:05:58.840 And anyone who tries to get a fair trial up there, guess what?

00:06:02.220 You'd better you'd have a better luck getting a fair trial in Siberia.

00:06:06.580 Darren Beattie's coming up next.

00:06:08.180 Ray Epps, of course, led off with a slap on the wrist.

00:06:10.620 Guess what, folks?

00:06:11.440 You live in the gay Soviet Union. 1.00

00:06:13.720 I told you, get used to it.

00:06:19.560 Ladies and gentlemen, one of the best ways that you can support us here at Human Events

00:06:23.840 and the work that we do is subscribing to us on our Rumble channel.

00:06:28.580 Make sure you're subscribed.

00:06:29.860 You hit the notifications so you'll never miss a clip.

00:06:32.780 You'll never miss a new live episode.

00:06:35.340 And we're putting them out every single day of the week.

00:06:38.000 I rolled with bloods, and them boys had a saying.

00:06:42.440 You can't be listening to all that slappy whack, trimatazol, it's a bam ship, nippy 1.00

00:06:46.860 bam bam, like Human Events with Jack Posobiec.

00:06:53.100 Folks, we are on the brink of an economic meltdown.

00:06:56.440 This is threatening your savings and your retirement.

00:06:59.400 Inflation has surged to a 40-year high, and that's why I want to tell you about today's

00:07:02.940 sponsor, Allegiance Gold.

00:07:04.500 You can try to budget carefully, but each trip to the grocery store feels like a soul

00:07:08.480 crutching, wallet-pinching experience.

00:07:11.260 Gasoline prices have doubled since 2020, and your monthly bills are escalating.

00:07:15.100 Inflation is an evil, silent force that eats away at your purchasing power and ultimately

00:07:19.460 your ability to save for retirement.

00:07:21.980 Don't let it happen to you.

00:07:23.440 Protect your retirement with my friends over at Allegiance Gold.

00:07:26.640 Alex, Mark, and the team over there will take the time to help you understand your options

00:07:29.860 and make the best decision for your future.

00:07:32.200 Whether your goal is to own physical gold or protect your IRA or 401k, the professionals

00:07:36.860 at Allegiance Gold are ready to help.

00:07:38.760 They burn the highest trust ratings in the precious metals industry and have built relationships

00:07:42.080 based on integrity, expertise, and impeccable service.

00:07:44.980 Go to protectwithposo.com today or call 844-577-POSO, and you can get now up to $5,000 in free silver

00:07:52.280 with a qualifying purchase.

00:07:53.760 Do not wait.

00:07:54.740 Protect your future now and your families with Allegiance Gold.

00:07:58.200 Protectwithposo.com, 844-577-POSO.

00:08:01.200 Look, folks, I said it yesterday, and we have an update today.

00:08:05.880 I have a breaking update for you.

00:08:07.320 So yesterday, I told you, we live in the gay Soviet Union, and it's getting gayer, folks. 1.00

00:08:13.820 It's getting gayer by the minute.

00:08:17.080 Darren Beattie joins us now.

00:08:19.460 Darren, if you could diagnose it for us, just how gay is our gay Soviet Union at the current

00:08:24.360 moment?

00:08:24.660 Well, it is incredibly gay. 0.82

00:08:28.880 I feel like we're doing the South Park, the Big Gay Owl episode is the big gay. 1.00

00:08:35.120 It's the only way.

00:08:36.180 It's the only way to get through 2024, man.

00:08:40.300 Indeed.

00:08:40.880 This is, of course, the GAE, the acronym of Globalist American Empire.

00:08:46.880 Yeah, I'm at GAE.

00:08:47.780 I don't know what anyone else was thinking.

00:08:49.380 Yes, absolutely.

00:08:50.820 And I've described our present dystopia as a kind of worst case combination of all the

00:09:00.380 worst aspects of East Germany, South Africa, and Brazil.

00:09:07.880 I think that descriptively is closest to the most accurate description you can come up

00:09:15.760 with.

00:09:16.760 And sometimes we'll see East German elements with the surveillance state, with, I would 0.97

00:09:22.580 say, the selective prosecutions and these sorts of things.

00:09:26.480 But then you also see elements of Brazil with the third world hordes pouring in on the 1.00

00:09:32.720 border, effectively open borders country, which is ridiculous.

00:09:37.880 And then you see elements of South Africa with the skyrocketing crime and criminality that's 0.89

00:09:43.600 infested our cities and inner cities to the point where you have entire cities, which

00:09:50.900 used to be the pride and joy, rightfully so, of the United States, cities like San Francisco.

00:09:57.640 You know, I recently saw a nice movie.

00:10:00.060 It's called The Game with Michael Douglas.

00:10:01.940 Um, and what struck me in my latest viewing was just how nice and posh San Francisco looked

00:10:09.820 as early as the 90s.

00:10:11.260 And now San Francisco is basically an open air skid row.

00:10:16.880 It's happened that fast.

00:10:18.740 And, you know, it's not unique to San Francisco.

00:10:21.240 You know, it's funny you mentioned that, uh, just because when I watched the, the old Hitchcock

00:10:26.320 movie vertigo and I had the exact same thought watching Jimmy Stewart and he's, you know,

00:10:30.980 chasing after the criminal, trying to figure out what happened.

00:10:33.220 And you're, you look at San Francisco, the city looks glorious.

00:10:36.320 It's an actual shining city on a hill.

00:10:38.680 We had something like that at one point and we threw it all away.

00:10:42.160 And now, uh, the other day I was, I was showing my son the terrible maps account on Twitter

00:10:47.440 and he said, daddy, what's that Brown map?

00:10:49.620 And I said, well, son, that's the map of all the poop in San Francisco.

00:10:53.480 And he had, he had a good laugh, right?

00:10:56.780 No, it's, it's really frustrating because we have all of these curtailments to freedom

00:11:01.880 and we get none of the benefits.

00:11:04.260 There's no grand objective that we're making these sacrifices for.

00:11:10.780 We're simply giving up all of our freedom.

00:11:13.120 And so, you know, we don't go after criminals who have nothing to contribute to society.

00:11:19.040 This kind of DEI regime, at least in a place like China, they can justify this dystopia 0.99

00:11:26.500 to their citizens by saying, we will restrict your freedoms, but we have a purpose.

00:11:30.720 We're trying to better our country.

00:11:33.460 We're trying to accelerate our.

00:11:35.500 The military prowess and so forth.

00:11:39.140 And we're at the very least not going to, um, imbue our nation's education system with

00:11:44.860 an ideology that teaches Chinese to hate themselves or engage in an immigration policy that amounts

00:11:52.280 to a deliberate replacement of their own people.

00:11:56.200 These are circumstances that are unique to the West and, um, unique to the poor style 0.99

00:12:05.460 of leadership, really criminal and treasonous leadership that's governed the West for over

00:12:11.380 a half century now.

00:12:12.800 So it's, you know, it's just very depressing to see that you'd think if you're going to

00:12:17.800 give up all these freedoms, at least you should get something in exchange.

00:12:21.340 But all we have, we don't even have clean streets to show for the fact that we have no freedoms.

00:12:27.960 At least Pyongyang has the clean streets. 0.99

00:12:32.020 At least Pyongyang has the clean streets. 0.99

00:12:34.340 It's exactly right.

00:12:35.400 You know, I can remember, and I've talked about here many times, uh, living in Shanghai and

00:12:40.000 walk, being able to walk down a street, uh, from corner to corner from one end of the city

00:12:45.040 to another three in the morning and having no issue with this.

00:12:47.960 But Darren, I want to bring it back to this, this clip we played earlier and, uh, we don't

00:12:53.580 have a lot of time left in the segment, so I'm going to go, I'm not going to play it again

00:12:55.860 right now, but she's asking this question about, well, what if the president, it's total

00:13:00.500 hypothetical, has nothing to do with anything that's brought up in the case.

00:13:03.760 And it's hypothetical of what if the president orders his opponent, his zeal team six to assassinate 0.63

00:13:08.800 one of his opponents and, and Trump's lawyer, uh, John Sauer starts, he refers back to

00:13:14.240 the federalist papers and he's talking about the separation of powers and he's talking about,

00:13:18.900 uh, the, the rich body of jurisprudence that we've had in this country, going back to the

00:13:24.020 framer's intent.

00:13:24.980 And she cuts him off and says, oh, so you won't answer my question.

00:13:29.940 She can't even engage with the things that he's bringing up or conceptualize it.

00:13:35.540 How can we get someone like that on a place like this, the DC appellate court, uh, which

00:13:42.760 by the way, is known for being a place where presidents choose Supreme court justices?

00:13:50.200 Yeah, well, I mean, the whole judiciary has become a scam and a crapshoot.

00:13:54.900 We see very seldom do we see anything resembling legal reasoning coming out of our court systems.

00:14:02.060 And of course, we've seen on numerous occasions and numerous instances, the degradation and

00:14:07.940 utter political weaponization of the court system that's come in tandem with the political

00:14:13.720 weaponization of the other, you know, national security bureaucracies.

00:14:18.500 And, you know, these are populated by apparatchiks, um, loyal servants of the regime, and in many

00:14:24.440 cases, just, you know, low IQ idiots. 0.90

00:14:28.080 Um, that's quite common as well.

00:14:30.760 And so the end result is what you see here with this kind of sham procedure to beleaguer

00:14:39.140 Trump, who is the front runner in the 2024 elections, beleaguer him legally and in every

00:14:45.120 other way to the extent that he's not able to participate in the democratic process.

00:14:51.640 And by extension, the half of the country, if not more, that wants him to be president

00:14:57.520 cannot participate in the democratic process that way because he's removed from the ballot

00:15:02.520 either by them throwing him in prison, indicting him or taking him off the ballot through some

00:15:09.060 completely ridiculous sham legal innovation.

00:15:12.100 They're throwing everything at him because they have no choice, really.

00:15:15.840 Well, that's exactly right.

00:15:18.640 And, and so, and of course, you know, uh, I guess, I think it goes without saying that,

00:15:23.260 uh, I'll, I'll ask you this, you know, so you more than anyone, um, are responsible for

00:15:28.740 bringing Ray Epps to the fore, uh, today he's received his sentence, boy, just, uh, they really

00:15:34.500 threw the book at him, huh?

00:15:35.740 I mean, it's really funny.

00:15:39.400 It was such a low effort thing because look, this is, they waited over almost three years

00:15:45.360 to do anything with the guy, which is amazing because his behavior was considered so egregious.

00:15:51.800 He was one of the first 20 people added to the FBI's most wanted list on it.

00:15:56.900 And early on, as I keep mentioning, the New York times featured him prominently in their

00:16:01.600 ominously titled day of rage documentary feature for January six.

00:16:07.300 And so the FBI, the New York times, all of these regime outlets rightly identified Epps 0.99

00:16:13.160 as central casting for the false story of the insurrection that they tried to blow up in

00:16:18.420 people's imaginations.

00:16:19.840 Here's the guy in former Marine six foot three in camo gear, a Trump hat.

00:16:25.780 The only guy caught on camera, urging people to go into the Capitol a day in advance.

00:16:31.080 He's there everywhere on the six direct people to the Capitol before Trump even started with

00:16:38.160 his speech.

00:16:38.800 He's pre-positioned at the exact decisive breach point on the West side of the Capitol before

00:16:44.460 Trump's speech is even over and so on and so forth.

00:16:47.740 And somehow, oh yeah.

00:16:49.280 And I forgot to mention, he was the former head of the Arizona chapter of the Oath Keepers,

00:16:54.280 the most demonized and heavily prosecuted militia group associated with January six.

00:16:59.680 So on paper, he would be the perfect face of this false insurrection that the regime has

00:17:06.340 been trying to blow up in our minds.

00:17:08.240 And initially, it looked like it might develop into that.

00:17:11.180 But very quickly and curiously, right when Revolver News introduced the idea of federal

00:17:17.160 involvement in January six, the next day, the FBI quietly removes him from that list.

00:17:24.680 And then all of a sudden, the New York Times does a fully dedicated puff piece on him.

00:17:29.640 All of a sudden, 60 Minutes does a sympathy segment on him.

00:17:33.240 All of a sudden, who's never met a Trump reporter he didn't want to see rotting away in prison

00:17:40.840 for less than 50 years, defends Epps more aggressively than Epps' own lawyer.

00:17:44.820 All of a sudden, David Brock's people are representing Ray Epps, this would-be insurrectionist.

00:17:53.620 And then the cherry on top, the regime says, uh-oh, the people, we've lost the plot.

00:17:59.760 This January six insurrection narrative that we've spent countless weeks on.

00:18:05.320 Coming up on a quick break.

00:18:06.900 Hold that thought, Darren.

00:18:08.380 We've got a quick break.

00:18:09.680 Ray Epps comes up.

00:18:11.240 I'm getting riled up there.

00:18:11.820 Ray Epps comes up.

00:18:12.900 No, I know, I know.

00:18:13.960 I mentioned, I mentioned Voldemort.

00:18:15.760 Uh, Ray Epps gets a slap on the wrist.

00:18:18.500 Darren Beattie's reaction when we come back here at Human Events Daily.

00:18:24.680 Influencers.

00:18:25.260 These are influencers.

00:18:27.040 And, uh, they're friends of mine.

00:18:29.520 Jack Persovic.

00:18:31.040 Where's Jack?

00:18:31.980 Jack.

00:18:33.060 He's done a great job.

00:18:34.400 All right, Jack Persovic back live.

00:18:38.720 I promised you that I'd get to the end of Darren Beattie's comment there on Ray Epps, who got off with this, a sweetheart deal.

00:18:47.840 I'm just going to say, it sounds to me like all the hallmarks of a sweetheart deal.

00:18:52.000 Darren, continue.

00:18:54.000 Indeed.

00:18:54.440 So I was just pointing out how interesting it is that the guy whose behavior was egregious enough to be first 20 on the FBI's most wanted list, featured prominently in New York's Times documentary.

00:19:05.200 Then Revolver News starts reporting on federal involvement.

00:19:08.640 And literally the next day, Epps is taken off the FBI's most wanted list.

00:19:12.780 And then shortly thereafter, the New York Times does a fully dedicated puff piece on him.

00:19:17.940 60 Minutes does a sympathy segment on him.

00:19:21.820 Adam Kinzinger starts defending him more aggressively than his own lawyers.

00:19:26.780 And now to put the toothpaste back in the tube to wrap up the loose ends three years after the regime in this lazy ploy to convince low information people that there's nothing to see here with Epps gives him a wrist slap misdemeanor charge.

00:19:42.180 And they don't even commit to the bit there because the government recommended the six months maximum within the misdemeanor, and he ends up just getting probation.

00:19:52.040 So they don't even commit to this ridiculous bit three years after to give him misdemeanor charge.

00:19:57.660 You know, everyone else, they get the obstruction of an official proceeding, which is currently under review by the Supreme Court and so forth.

00:20:04.640 They, in fact, admit in the charging documents that he engaged in felonious conduct, but there were mitigating factors, quote unquote, including the fact, in their view, that he was subject to conspiracy.

00:20:24.240 It's really amazing, and I think it's clear what's going on here.

00:20:27.540 And I should point out, though, that the fact that he's getting this lenient treatment, to say the least, isn't just, oh, you know, he's an asset or they like him, he's cooperated, therefore he gets lenient treatment.

00:20:39.120 Because, as I pointed out in other contexts, the feds are more than willing to seriously burn their assets once they come liabilities.

00:20:47.360 The fact that they haven't burned Epps in this fashion suggests to me that Epps has a lot more leverage on them than just January 6th.

00:20:57.680 That's, of course, speculation, but that, I think, is the most reasonable reading, in my view, that he's, you know, this is not his first rodeo, and I guess I'll leave it at that.

00:21:07.880 Well, I'm just going to say, it seems to me that this deal has all the hallmarks of what you would give someone who was a cooperating asset, someone who had been cooperating with you, possibly for longer than just the January 6th event, which I think is what you're getting at here.

00:21:27.720 And this idea, it's no jail, it's a $500 fine, and community service, community service, for, as opposed to, which, which, by the way, and I'm going to be clear about this, this is the type of sentence that all the Jan Sixers should have received. 1.00

00:21:45.280 This is what, right, so we know what the benchmark is, and that's why we're incredulous here, because we know that for every Democrat who does something like this, this is what they would have gotten.

00:21:55.460 To clarify, it's, I'm not particularly scandalized by his behavior per se, although it's far more egregious than most everyone else.

00:22:05.540 The thing that's the scandal here is this selective prosecution, and the idea that the Department of Justice took a posture of, quote-unquote, shock and awe to throw the kitchen sink at relatively trivial actors.

00:22:22.540 They gave them the SWAT treatment two or three weeks after January 6th, and yet with Ray Epps, who, by all accounts, relatively speaking, seems to be the most egregious participant, and the FBI agreed, and so did the New York Times before we started reporting on the Fed's direction.

00:22:38.540 So the fact that, unlike others who had the SWAT treatment, they had the red dots, you know, on their chests and on their wives and families at three in the morning, many such cases, so to speak.

00:22:51.540 With Ray Epps, there's no such thing.

00:22:54.920 They wait almost three years.

00:22:56.900 They warn him in advance that there's a misdemeanor, and they not only don't give him the recommended sentencing, they give him zero jail time and probation three years after.

00:23:06.520 It simply, it doesn't add up at all, and it's so clumsy.

00:23:13.640 It's such a clumsy cover-up, but I guess the regime doesn't think they need to do any better than that, because what are the plebs going to do? 1.00

00:23:22.700 What are the peasants going to do?

00:23:24.260 They don't even need to sort of honor us with a more sophisticated cover story.

00:23:30.940 And so here's something that is interesting to me, that Mitt Romney was giving an interview with the New York Times and said, and it's very strange to me that he actually said this three days after the anniversary of January 6th, where he said, they went to him, they said, oh, here we are, it's the three-year anniversary, we're just a couple days later, what are your thoughts on it?

00:23:53.300 And Senator Romney, I saw this reported in the National Polls, said, I think January 6th is a dead horse politically.

00:24:01.660 He said, I think Biden needs new material, and I think people have processed it one way or the other.

00:24:07.540 You're not going to change anyone's opinion on that.

00:24:10.520 Could this potentially be a turning of the page, in a sense, from at least some elements of the regime from January 6th?

00:24:18.900 And perhaps this Ray Epps, this Ray Epps deal represents the closing, you know, they're closing the loop, right?

00:24:24.520 They're trying to close the Ray Epps loop.

00:24:26.460 They don't want Darren Beattie talking about him anymore.

00:24:28.740 No more revolver exposés.

00:24:30.360 Just make it go away.

00:24:31.620 He'll be off picking trash, and that'll be the end of it.

00:24:35.380 Yes and no.

00:24:37.180 Narratively speaking, that's absolutely the case, because they think people are so unsophisticated.

00:24:42.800 They think the argument is Epps didn't get indicted, therefore he was a Fed, therefore no matter when they charge him with anything, no matter what circumstances, no matter how late, simply charging him with anything constitutes a refutation of the mountains of evidence that we've presented over the course of the past three years.

00:25:03.140 That's their thinking.

00:25:04.240 So in that sense, yes, they want to close the narrative loop.

00:25:07.260 But in another sense, they can't quit January 6th.

00:25:11.240 I don't think the American population is especially interested in it.

00:25:16.220 But on the one hand, you know, conservatives, patriots should be interested in it because it's used as a pretext to further the weaponization of the national security state against us.

00:25:28.980 And the Democrats are interested in it because it's basically the linchpin off of which they've based all of their phony legal theories in order to stop Trump from running according to the normal Democrat process.

00:25:42.660 So in that sense, when you when you see Biden talking about January 6th, he's not necessarily speaking to voters that I don't think really care about it.

00:26:00.180 What he's doing is he's reinforcing the narrative that the Democrats need to defeat Trump through sort of extracurricular means, through through extra Democratic means, through lawfare and other mechanisms that we've seen and that I expect to intensify.

00:26:19.360 Well, I think that's right. I think it's going to get worse, Darren, as we're as we're going through 2024.

00:26:26.220 So we have this sort of two track situation and no happy for just a couple of more minutes.

00:26:32.460 We've got the presidential election, of course, Iowa takes place in just a couple of days time here, four days, four or five days away from Iowa.

00:26:41.380 And yet there's also this legal media track that also the regime, this gauntlet they're throwing on Donald Trump.

00:26:51.440 What do you think comes next?

00:26:52.600 Well, anything can come next.

00:26:56.740 And I just had a very interesting conversation with Vivek that's up on Revolver.news now.

00:27:03.360 That's disturbing even for me.

00:27:05.020 I thought, you know, I could stomach disturbing things.

00:27:07.460 But, you know, there's always been this conundrum.

00:27:10.140 What are the Democrats going to do?

00:27:11.700 They're kind of stuck with Joe Biden.

00:27:13.580 They can't get rid of him and have Kamala. 0.89

00:27:15.560 And I think it's worth observing and understanding that from the regime's perspective, Nikki Haley would not do that.

00:27:27.080 And in fact, many ways she would be better for them than Joe Biden.

00:27:30.460 Because if they can install Nikki Haley as president, they can suggest that, oh, you know, you guys thought your election was stolen.

00:27:40.280 This time a Republican won.

00:27:41.860 So the system is actually legitimate because a Republican won, when in practice it's a Republican that's a more dedicated and loyal servant to the regime than even Joe Biden, who at least his senility is a wild card factor, that he might just have a, you know, a brain collapse and end up doing something that isn't detrimental to the American public.

00:28:04.000 Unfortunately, Nikki Haley's brain is still functioning to the extent that she can continuously and consistently and probably somewhat effectively implement the regime's design against the American people.

00:28:17.920 So I think the notion of Nikki Haley as this dark force figure and the solution to the regime's problem with Biden is something that we should take increasingly seriously.

00:28:33.360 And, you know, what that means with Trump, well, you know, there are some dark possibilities there.

00:28:38.100 I think it suffices to say that the regime will do everything in its power to prevent the American people from being able to actually vote for Trump in the election.

00:28:50.660 The voter fraud here is going to take place before the election.

00:28:56.260 The steel is going to take place.

00:28:57.880 The steel is not in the counting of ballots.

00:29:01.080 It's in simply not having him on the ballot.

00:29:04.400 It's very clear that that's what their aim is.

00:29:07.940 From day one, I've said this many times, the regime is doing everything in its power to ensure that the American people are never able to meddle in their own elections again.

00:29:20.200 And we're going to see if you thought 2023 was wild in terms of the indictments, the civil suits, the legal theories.

00:29:29.480 2024 is going to be that on steroids with orders of magnitude more intense, more crazy and more dark.

00:29:37.760 Well, I couldn't agree with you more.

00:29:41.080 And I hate to say it, but I couldn't because they have said and we remember, I always go back to that piece that Alan Bakari found that internal Google meeting about one week or so after the election.

00:29:54.080 And he was leaked to him by a whistleblower.

00:29:57.400 And this is Sundar Pinchai, head of Google.

00:29:59.920 And they're up there.

00:30:00.840 Everyone's in tears.

00:30:01.940 They're crying.

00:30:02.600 It's almost like it's, you know, I'd say it's a struggle session.

00:30:04.900 It's more like a pity party.

00:30:06.140 And he says to them, we will make sure this never happens again.

00:30:11.620 So that's eight years ago.

00:30:12.900 We will make sure this never happens again.

00:30:17.560 Darren Beattie, where can people go to follow you at the latest from Revolver News?

00:30:20.220 We must annex Antarctica in any basis that may or may not be there.

00:30:48.260 Where is Jack?

00:30:50.940 Where's Jack?

00:30:53.020 Where is he?

00:30:54.300 Jack, I want to see you.

00:30:57.960 Great job, Jack.

00:30:59.400 Thank you.

00:31:00.180 What a job you do.

00:31:01.580 You know, we have an incredible thing.

00:31:02.980 We're always talking about the fake news and the bad.

00:31:05.280 But we have guys.

00:31:06.680 And these are the guys who should be getting Pulisic.

00:31:11.920 Folks, the world is in flames.

00:31:13.320 We know that Bidenomics is a complete and total disaster.

00:31:17.880 But it cannot and it will not ruin my day.

00:31:20.840 And you know why?

00:31:21.560 It's because I start my day with a hot America first cup of blackout coffee.

00:31:25.120 Let me tell you something.

00:31:25.920 This coffee is 100% Americana.

00:31:29.100 They're 100% committed to conservative values at blackout coffee.

00:31:32.600 From sourcing the beans to the roasting process, customer support and shipping, they embody true American values.

00:31:39.020 And accept no compromise on taste or quality.

00:31:41.900 Look, here in the swamp, we are getting drenched today.

00:31:44.360 Hopefully, the swamp gets absolutely drained while it's being flushed out because of this rainstorm.

00:31:51.540 That's why I started this morning dropping both kids off with blackout coffee.

00:31:56.000 So go to blackoutcoffee.com slash POSO.

00:31:58.240 Use promo code POSO20 for 20% off your first order.

00:32:02.260 Check out the gear selection.

00:32:03.440 Incredible gifts ideas while they're there for anybody you want.

00:32:06.280 Blackoutcoffee.com slash POSO.

00:32:07.900 Be awake, not woke.

00:32:09.160 Blackoutcoffee.com slash POSO.

00:32:11.460 Promo code POSO20.

00:32:12.480 We have the great Julie Kelly joining us in just one moment. 1.00

00:32:16.900 But I want to play, again, this clip of Judge Pan of the D.C. Appellate Court.

00:32:23.920 He said an order to seal Team 6 to assassinate a political rival.

00:32:28.520 That's an official act in order to seal Team 6.

00:32:31.020 He would have to be and would speedily be, you know, impeached and convicted before the criminal prosecution.

00:32:37.660 But if he weren't, there would be no criminal prosecution, no criminal liability for that?

00:32:41.820 Chief Justice's opinion in Marlboro against Madison and our Constitution and the plain language of the impeachment judgment clause all clearly presuppose that.

00:32:52.980 What the founders were concerned about was not.

00:32:54.700 I asked you a yes or no question.

00:32:58.080 Could a president who ordered Seal Team 6 to assassinate a political rival who was not impeached?

00:33:03.600 Would he be subject to criminal prosecution?

00:33:07.360 If he were impeached and convicted first.

00:33:09.560 So your answer is no?

00:33:12.240 My answer is qualified, yes.

00:33:13.600 There is a political process that would have to occur under the structure of our Constitution, which would require impeachment and conviction by the Senate.

00:33:19.560 In these exceptional cases, as the OLC memo itself points out from the Department of Justice, you'd expect a speedy impeachment and conviction.

00:33:26.400 I don't know if I could do it, folks.

00:33:30.480 I don't know if you could do it.

00:33:31.200 Julie Kelly, save me here.

00:33:33.300 Save me.

00:33:33.740 I want to jump out.

00:33:34.620 Like, I've got a window here in the studio.

00:33:36.220 I just want to jump.

00:33:37.300 I just I want to go full creed.

00:33:38.920 I want to go full one.

00:33:39.840 One last breath.

00:33:41.580 I'm thinking that six feet ain't so far down.

00:33:43.620 Why will she not simply engage with what the man is saying, number one, about our founders, about our process, about our Constitution and our history and the jurisprudence in this country?

00:33:55.320 And why is she bringing up hypotheticals when he himself was talking about something that Barack Obama actually did while in office?

00:34:04.520 Well, because she's an activist judge. 1.00

00:34:07.160 Welcome to my world.

00:34:08.240 These are the judges I've been listening to for three years in Washington, D.C.

00:34:12.820 This is the same level of thoughtfulness, hypotheticals, hyperbole, obviously political lectures from the bench that I've been listening to for three years in J6 cases. 1.00

00:34:25.880 Florence Pan, not only is she not very bright, recall that she, of course, was appointed by Joe Biden.

00:34:33.140 Her husband, Max Steyer, is a longtime Democratic Party activist in Washington who was one of Brett Kavanaugh's chief antagonists.

00:34:43.140 He was just in a movie at Sundance Film Festival where he was interviewed and claimed the FBI did not properly investigate Brett Kavanaugh and especially his accusations, what he said that he saw Brett Kavanaugh do as a freshman at Yale.

00:34:56.380 So clearly she had her marching orders.

00:34:59.600 What a preposterous, outlandish hypothetical.

00:35:03.880 And furthermore, if that did happen, the proper course, as Trump's lawyer indicated, is impeachment and conviction.

00:35:13.700 Does Judge Pan think that the attorney general from the president who used Team 6 to kill a political opponent is going to what?

00:35:21.600 Arrest him and charge him?

00:35:22.880 We know that that's not how this goes.

00:35:26.080 So it was just silly.

00:35:27.460 But of course, it resulted in what her marching orders were to get the headlines we're already seeing by corporate media and legal analysts like Andrew Weissman. 0.97

00:35:38.940 Donald Trump's lawyer says if a president used SEAL Team 6 to kill a political rival, he could not be prosecuted, which, of course, is not what he said.

00:35:48.460 And this is what they do, by the way.

00:35:51.440 But this is what they do in political campaigns where someone will say, well, ask a hypothetical question.

00:35:57.480 Chris Matthews famously did this to Trump in 2016 on the abortion question where you ask these wild hypotheticals to get them to answer you, which have nothing to do.

00:36:08.460 It's a classic political trick.

00:36:10.760 Anyone who's been in the business knows about these.

00:36:13.060 When I go to politics, when I'm advising or in my in my previous career, when I would advise a politician and say, don't answer hypotheticals.

00:36:19.780 Do not play the game.

00:36:21.120 Right.

00:36:21.300 Never play the game.

00:36:22.160 And the lawyer here, which is tough because you can't say that to a lawyer necessarily because that's a federal judge.

00:36:28.320 Now you're not answering the question.

00:36:30.420 So it's a disgrace when it comes to our actual system, because she's talking about something that doesn't exist in reality and then forcing him to answer the question.

00:36:41.680 And, you know, shame on her. 1.00

00:36:43.960 We they are deciding.

00:36:45.400 We heard this today.

00:36:46.620 Judge Pan, Judge Michelle Childs, also a Biden appointee and Karen Henderson appointed by George W. Bush.

00:36:55.460 But we heard the two Biden appointees jump on Trump's lawyer from the get go.

00:37:01.280 He could barely even finish his opening statement before they were already badgering him.

00:37:06.840 Hypotheticals are fine when they are presented in court, but not when you're talking about an unprecedented ruling from Judge Chutkin denying Donald Trump's presidential immunity in this criminal prosecution.

00:37:19.680 This is not fun and games.

00:37:21.120 This will be a decision that will have long term permanent consequences on the country, which is what Trump's lawyer brought up today.

00:37:28.460 This is republic crushing decision and it will perpetuate a cycle where an incoming president will immediately open a criminal investigation with his DOJ into his predecessor.

00:37:39.900 Could be, you know, you know, of the opposite party, we're assuming.

00:37:44.100 And that's all that that would happen time and time again.

00:37:47.840 So this isn't time for jokes.

00:37:49.960 This isn't time for preening before the media.

00:37:52.380 This is a serious discussion for this country.

00:37:54.880 And to have Judge Pan, this lightweight, you know, make a joke or or go to the biggest extreme she could possibly think of to produce headlines that she knew were going to happen.

00:38:06.960 This is but this is what's happening in D.C., Jack.

00:38:09.580 This is why we should not have a federal courthouse in Washington, D.C.

00:38:13.580 We should not have a federal prosecutor, Matthew Graves.

00:38:16.820 We should not have a Washington FBI field office.

00:38:19.900 That's the triumvirate of evil.

00:38:22.860 That is the cabal that has been using our tax money, their unchecked powers to not fight crime, but to go after Donald Trump, his family, his cabinet members and now his voters.

00:38:34.560 And this is what we're ending up with, happening to listen to adults like Florence Pan and Michelle Childs try to trick a constitutional lawyer, trip him up with stupid hypotheticals.

00:38:46.500 It's really, really a dismal situation.

00:38:49.900 And it is ridiculous because, of course, he's talking about the history of the Constitution.

00:38:55.160 He's talking from the context of this is what the Constitution lays out in terms of when the president commits and, again, commits one of these offenses.

00:39:06.180 That's the impeachment process.

00:39:08.640 And so he simply clarifies that and he clarifies it over and over.

00:39:12.860 Then they start going in with these crazy hypotheticals.

00:39:16.480 And here's what's going to happen.

00:39:17.300 And Florence Pan is going to go to the next high society dinner in Washington, D.C.

00:39:23.020 And she's going to be surrounded by people from the bar, from the D.C. bar, not just the not just the wet bar, but she'll be there, too.

00:39:30.840 And she'll be there, go.

00:39:32.280 And they'll say, oh, that was wonderful.

00:39:33.820 Seal Team six.

00:39:35.060 That was so.

00:39:35.840 And the adulation and the love bombing that she's going to receive from them are wonderful.

00:39:40.680 And so you and I and I and I'm so glad that we have this audio, by the way.

00:39:45.260 It's actually very useful for us because, you know, we can go out to, you know, the federal FEMA districts where the actual citizens live and say, look, the subjects of the regime and say, look at how they talk within the Capitol.

00:39:58.980 Look at how they talk about you.

00:40:00.580 Look at how they treat these decisions.

00:40:02.060 And I remember the Tea Party days and I was part of it.

00:40:04.380 And we upheld the Constitution and we talked about we had great debates about that.

00:40:08.480 They're not having debates about the Constitution up there.

00:40:11.040 They're not talking about the founders and the framers and Madison and the history.

00:40:15.700 No, they're they're making ridiculous hypotheticals.

00:40:18.420 And but here's what's not ridiculous.

00:40:19.400 And just one minute to the break, Julie, what's not ridiculous is what they're talking about is their own power, isn't it?

00:40:26.600 It is. And at one point, Florence Pan, in this weird little riff, said that Donald Trump's interests as president were not aligned with the interests of the executive branch, the institution.

00:40:43.940 He is the executive branch, Florence Pan.

00:40:46.960 This is this is a huge.

00:40:48.920 I'm sorry, this is a huge important point.

00:40:50.740 The institution's interests are Donald Trump's president's interests.

00:40:54.840 It was obviously is someone's under a constitution.

00:40:58.980 Quick, quick break.

00:41:00.040 Julie Kelly, we've got another segment.

00:41:02.100 We've got another segment.

00:41:03.100 We've got a lot to say.

00:41:04.100 Julie Kelly's always got a lot to say.

00:41:05.880 We are going to make sure that she's able to say all the way.

00:41:08.720 Long hours.

00:41:12.620 I'm always listening to Human Events with Jack Posobiec.

00:41:16.760 Jack Posobiec back.

00:41:17.660 Human Events Daily.

00:41:18.400 We're breaking down everything that happened.

00:41:20.660 This bombshell shots fired really within Washington, D.C.

00:41:26.060 And no, I don't mean over in Anacostia at the gas station.

00:41:29.180 I mean legal shots and political shots fired.

00:41:32.420 Republic shattering decisions that were in where this judge, Judge Pan at one point, who was a total dyed in the wool Marxist apparatchik diversity hire, actually says at one point that Trump was interested in election integrity.

00:41:47.980 And that's not in the interest of the executive branch and the institution.

00:41:53.260 Julie Kelly, what is going on that would make a judge say something like that?

00:41:57.760 Because, of course, the president of the United States is the executive branch.

00:42:01.580 And then number two, who is this judge?

00:42:05.700 So I think she was doing it.

00:42:07.420 A lot of the controversy, of course, of all of this is was President Trump's conduct within the confines of his official duties or was it outside of that, that he was acting on his own, that he was acting in political interest?

00:42:22.100 So that could sort of explain this muddled whatever thing that she said about election integrity and Donald Trump not aligning with the priorities of the institution of the executive branch.

00:42:33.880 If that's not an admittance as to the priorities of these judges protecting the institutions that their friends, that their husbands, that their children, their neighbors all populate and run.

00:42:46.600 Boy, that was a really telling moment.

00:42:48.300 But Judge Pan, interesting figure, and I was going to say, she said the quiet part out loud.

00:42:54.140 She said the quiet part out loud because this is someone who lives in the bubble.

00:42:58.080 This is someone who's surrounded by the deep state.

00:43:01.100 She's a part of the deep state.

00:43:02.600 She's saying the quiet part out loud.

00:43:04.280 They're like, no, Florence, shut up.

00:43:06.340 Don't say it.

00:43:07.600 That she's saying she's telling you right there.

00:43:09.660 The executive branch wants him out.

00:43:11.980 What does she mean by that?

00:43:13.180 This is the interagency.

00:43:14.580 Remember, folks, the interagency, as we have to say it here on the show.

00:43:17.840 All of the institutions and the agencies in D.C. want him gone.

00:43:22.720 And she's saying that Trump's interest in election integrity doesn't align with theirs because the deep state is not interested in election integrity.

00:43:31.820 Well, I mean, look, she both of those judges, Michelle Childs and Florence Pan, appointed by Joe Biden, gave Trump's lawyers a lot of fodder to take this to the Supreme Court.

00:43:43.660 This line of thinking, the hypothetical, as we as we noted, and then, of course, this admittance that Donald Trump was working against the institution of the executive branch.

00:43:54.380 So lots of fodder there for his attorneys to to, you know, seek a petition before the Supreme Court.

00:44:00.900 But look, this is not the only reason why Judge Pan is dangerous.

00:44:05.380 As I put on Twitter, panels at the Supreme at the appellate court, the circuit court, are supposed to be randomly assigned.

00:44:13.300 So strange that Judge Pan just happens to turn up on these three judge panels of all these consequential politically charged decisions.

00:44:22.180 She upheld Beryl Howell, allowing the search warrant, the subpoena for Donald Trump's Twitter files and the nondisclosure order preventing Twitter from telling Trump about it and the $350,000 fine that Beryl Howell, an Obama appointee brazen partisan as well, levied against the company.

00:44:43.900 She upheld that decision.

00:44:45.180 Judge Pan, also on the three panel, three judge panel, that upheld another ruling by Beryl Howell, piercing attorney-client privilege between Evan Corcoran and Donald Trump in the classified documents case.

00:45:00.500 By the way, an investigation of proceedings that never should have happened in Washington, all should have been handled in Southern Florida.

00:45:06.340 Nonetheless, Judge Pan is on that panel, upholding Howell, piercing attorney-client privilege, and forcing Evan Corcoran to turn over all of his records to Jack Smith.

00:45:17.620 She also was on both of the three judge panels that barely upheld DOJ's use of obstruction of an official proceeding 1512C2, barely upheld it in two cases.

00:45:30.280 And, of course, in one of those that now is pending before the Supreme Court, represents half of Jack Smith's criminal indictment against Donald Trump.

00:45:38.480 Now that you hear her in action, I've listened to her at other appellate hearings.

00:45:42.160 The fact that she ends up on all these panels and writes, in some cases, the 1512C2, the deciding opinion represents the deciding opinion.

00:45:51.500 As I said, these are long-term, permanent decisions made by someone of the political and intelligent nature of Judge Florence Pan.

00:46:03.200 And this, but the one that I wanted to ask about is, so she's married to this guy, Max Steyer.

00:46:09.840 Max Steyer is the CEO of the Partnership for Public Service.

00:46:14.980 You know, when I hear a name like that, I say, wow, that's got to be, sounds like the Open Society Foundation.

00:46:19.820 There's these wonderful names.

00:46:21.580 What is, who is Max Steyer, and what does he do?

00:46:24.680 So, of course, he is, as I said, a Democratic Party activist.

00:46:28.160 He got involved in the character assassination attempt against Brett Kavanaugh.

00:46:33.480 He was a classmate of Brett Kavanaugh's at Yale, and he claimed that he saw Brett Kavanaugh engage in some lewd behavior with another girl at a party.

00:46:45.200 He took that information to the FBI, to Democratic senators.

00:46:49.060 It was all over the news.

00:46:51.360 He claimed that the FBI did not investigate his claims.

00:46:55.420 But he has continued to perpetuate that and was just in this film, released at Sundance, where he's interviewed and, again, claimed that the FBI did not properly vet all of these sexual misconduct allegations about Brett Kavanaugh.

00:47:10.780 Now, think, now, game this out with me, though, Jack.

00:47:13.760 Brett Kavanaugh is going to be a Supreme Court justice considering these appellate decisions by Max Steyer's wife.

00:47:22.500 So that could give him a little opportunity for some revenge.

00:47:27.760 Not sure that Brett Kavanaugh is capable of it.

00:47:30.340 But it would certainly be deliciously ironic if he is the deciding vote.

00:47:34.600 Well, but at the same time, we have a minute left here, but at the same time, it can also be used from the Democrats and from the left to call for him to recuse himself in this by saying, oh, you've got a conflict of interest because your accuser happens to be the husband of the appellate judge in the decision.

00:47:54.740 That's what I think is going to happen here.

00:47:56.020 Could be.

00:47:57.620 Not so sure that that works in the Democrats' favor, that they want to bring attention to the fact that Florence Pan is married to Max Steyer, but who knows?

00:48:04.820 You know, they are.

00:48:05.540 Well, at the end of the day, it's all power.

00:48:07.200 Julie, just one minute left on this. 0.98

00:48:09.940 Where can people go?

00:48:10.640 Because I know you have so much more.

00:48:11.900 I wish we had more time with you.

00:48:12.960 Unfortunately, the constraints of time are what they are.

00:48:16.080 Yes.

00:48:16.440 So declassified with Julie Kelly at Substack.

00:48:18.600 And, as you know, breaking news coverage, Julie underscore Kelly, too, on Twitter, X.

00:48:23.900 Look, folks, you just need to be following Julie Kelly.

00:48:27.220 You need to be reading everything she puts out, the missives, everything on her substack.

00:48:31.040 She's got a great show. 0.96

00:48:32.040 If you want to go into this, you want to find out how we got to this bombshell of a showdown in Washington, D.C., Trump actually there.

00:48:42.180 Politically aligned lawyers, folks, you got to understand, the diversity hires of the gay Soviet Union are ruling the roost. 1.00

00:48:51.580 When your show trial comes, they'll find out just how gay you're willing to be.

00:48:57.740 Ladies and gentlemen, as always, you have my permission to lay it short.

Human Events Daily with Jack Posobiec - January 09, 2024

EPISODE 644： BIDEN JUDGE POISED TO STRIP TRUMP OF PRESIDENTIAL IMMUNITY, RAY EPPS SWEETHEART DEAL

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript