Human Events Daily with Jack Posobiec - January 31, 2024


EPISODE 660： POSO VS THE WORLD - GLOBAL MELTDOWN AS DEM BALLOT OP EXPOSED


Episode Stats


Length

48 minutes

Words per minute

178.66635

Word count

8,716

Sentence count

630

Harmful content

Misogyny

10

sentences flagged

Toxicity

10

sentences flagged

Hate speech

15

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

Jack Posobiec breaks down a new conspiracy theory about Taylor Swift and the NFL and the Democratic Party being in cahoots to get President Joe Biden re-elected in 2020. Plus, a man in Mississippi is facing a hate crime charge for allegedly destroying a satanic statue in the state capitol.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 I want to take a second to remind you to sign up for the Poso Daily Brief.
00:00:05.420 It is completely free.
00:00:06.760 It'll be one email that's sent to you every day.
00:00:08.640 You can stop the endless scrolling, trying to find out what's going on in your world.
00:00:11.720 We will have this delivered directly to you totally for free.
00:00:14.960 Go to humanevents.com slash Poso.
00:00:17.240 Sign up today.
00:00:18.460 It's called the Poso Daily Brief.
00:00:19.860 Read what I read for show prep.
00:00:21.780 You will not regret it.
00:00:23.420 humanevents.com slash Poso.
00:00:25.060 Totally free.
00:00:25.820 The Poso Daily Brief.
00:00:30.000 This is what happens when the fourth turning meets fifth generation warfare.
00:00:40.140 A commentator, international social media sensation, and former Navy intelligence veteran.
00:00:46.780 This is Human Events with your host, Jack Posobiec.
00:00:49.720 Deliver us from evil.
00:00:51.320 We were told two days ago by Biden officials that this president does not consult polls
00:00:56.480 or what's popular when he is making policy decisions.
00:01:00.380 But it's tough to understand what else could be motivating this trip after a year almost
00:01:06.880 of ignoring resident requests to come by in East Palestine.
00:01:11.200 The state of Texas is banning Biden's border agents from Shelby Park.
00:01:15.440 The city of Eagle Pass.
00:01:16.540 Former President Trump's name will probably be on the Illinois primary ballot,
00:01:20.380 even though voters had challenged his eligibility to run.
00:01:23.180 An election board in the state unanimously ruling they don't have the authority to keep
00:01:27.980 Trump off the state's primary ballot.
00:01:30.480 Pope County prosecutors are upping charges against a Mississippi man who police say admitted
00:01:35.000 to destroying a satanic statue at the state capitol.
00:01:38.960 Prosecutors originally charged Cassidy with criminal mischief.
00:01:42.720 According to the Des Moines Register, prosecutors now added a hate crime charge this week.
00:01:47.540 President Biden says he's decided how America will respond to Iran and its proxy forces after
00:01:53.600 three U.S. soldiers were killed in a drone attack.
00:01:56.340 For years now, all the big celebrities, Bruce Springsteen, Beyonce, Jay-Z, have all thrown
00:02:01.240 their support behind Democrats election after election, while MAGA is stuck with people like
00:02:06.300 Vanilla Ice and one of the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles.
00:02:09.160 Does it even matter which one?
00:02:10.780 Just listen to what alt-right activist Jack Posobiec said about it today.
00:02:15.420 We don't have a Taylor Swift on our side, but you know who we have?
00:02:18.540 We have Kid Rock, we have Ted Nugent, we have influencers.
00:02:22.020 With the Kansas City Chiefs headed to the Super Bowl, influential MAGA media personalities,
00:02:27.120 they're pushing this conspiracy theory about Taylor Swift, her superstar boyfriend Travis
00:02:32.520 Kelsey, the NFL, the Democratic Party being in cahoots, all woven together here trying to
00:02:39.200 get President Biden re-elected.
00:02:40.560 Far-right conspiracy theorist Jack Posobiec claimed that the Democratic Party and other
00:02:45.700 powers are, quote, gearing up for an operation to use Taylor Swift in the election against
00:02:51.300 Donald Trump.
00:02:52.760 Well, ladies and gentlemen, welcome aboard today's edition of Human Events Daily, live from Washington,
00:02:58.760 D.C.
00:02:59.100 Today is January 31st, 2024, Anno Domini.
00:03:03.440 Boys, I gotta say, today it's Poso versus the world.
00:03:08.000 Poso versus the world because I had the temerity, the alacrity, the audacity to call out poor Taylor
00:03:17.380 Swift and to say the Democrats are clearly planning to use her later on in the year as a ballot
00:03:24.140 harvesting operation.
00:03:25.280 Folks, we got the New York Times, CNN, The Guardian, Newsweek, TMZ, Yahoo, The Huffington
00:03:33.240 Post, MSNBC, Joy Ann Weave, shout out to Carly Bonet, and even the Hindustan Times are coming
00:03:41.780 after Poso, as well as a bunch of conservative Swifties out there, and you know who you are,
00:03:47.440 conservative Swifties, all so, so, so upset.
00:03:51.200 Let me explain, let me lay this out for you, I'm going to break it down Barney style, here
00:03:54.700 we go.
00:03:55.660 It's only a three-step thought process, but that's a lot for some people.
00:04:00.900 So here's step one, recognize that this is a PR-driven celebrity relationship.
00:04:06.640 A lot of people can't get past that.
00:04:08.180 All right, that's step one.
00:04:09.080 It's not real.
00:04:10.120 It is PR-driven.
00:04:11.560 Number two, the NFL will exploit that for profit and brand equity.
00:04:17.580 It's already happening.
00:04:19.880 I think everyone can see that.
00:04:22.140 American Airlines even changed their flight number from Kansas City to Las Vegas to American
00:04:27.700 Airlines flight 1989 to coincide with the year she was born, because she's not young, and
00:04:34.720 her tour, her albums, everything.
00:04:38.040 Step three.
00:04:38.560 Democrats already have the data that their highest percentage of demographic support is
00:04:44.500 white, liberal, unmarried women, and that overlaps directly with Taylor's audience, which 1.00
00:04:51.460 is now multi-generational.
00:04:53.560 Ergo, converting low propensity Swifties is a critical ballot harvesting strategy for the 0.99
00:04:59.340 Democrat operation in swing states.
00:05:01.520 That's why I flew out to Nevada yesterday to talk about this.
00:05:05.900 And yes, we are going to be running targeted ballot harvesting operations in those swing
00:05:11.380 states.
00:05:11.780 We might call it ballot chase.
00:05:12.960 We might call it ballot call-up, whatever it is, ballot turnout in those early voting
00:05:17.720 states, whichever the legal process required by that state is.
00:05:22.160 We're not going to play the game.
00:05:23.780 We're going to win the game.
00:05:25.260 And so we can see what the Democrats are doing.
00:05:27.340 I can see what the Democrats are doing.
00:05:28.940 And I'm going to call it out long before, long before the election, long before, because
00:05:34.940 folks, sunlight is the best disinfectant.
00:05:38.620 And we're going to have Mike Benz on here in a minute.
00:05:40.480 We're going to go through even more how the Democrats and the regime have used Taylor Swift
00:05:46.520 many times in the past and are gearing up to again in 2024.
00:05:52.320 And by the way, who else came out to support Taylor Swift today?
00:05:57.060 None other than the head of the January 6th committee for two years, Liz Cheney, coming
00:06:02.780 out and saying, Taylor Swift is a national treasure, national treasure or national asset.
00:06:08.460 Mike Benz joins us next.
00:06:09.720 Ladies and gentlemen, one of the best ways that you can support us here at Human Events and
00:06:17.840 the work that we do is subscribing to us on our Rumble channel.
00:06:22.460 Make sure you're subscribed.
00:06:23.660 You hit the notifications so you'll never miss a clip.
00:06:26.580 You'll never miss a new live episode.
00:06:28.940 And we're putting them out every single day of the week.
00:06:32.220 Taylor Swift is not a PSYOP.
00:06:33.600 Taylor Swift is not a PSYOP.
00:06:47.320 This is extremely dangerous to our democracy.
00:06:54.320 This is extremely dangerous to our democracy.
00:06:56.520 Jack Posobiec back live, Human Events Daily.
00:07:00.640 Massive shout out to my friend, Benny Johnson, for compiling that incredible clip for us about
00:07:05.860 reminding us, of course, that Taylor Swift is not a PSYOP.
00:07:08.900 By the way, I'd like to take this time to issue a special announcement to the Human Events
00:07:13.680 audience and to the world.
00:07:15.080 Yes, I will be hosting the POSO special Super Bowl halftime show hosted by myself featuring
00:07:24.140 an A.I.
00:07:25.940 Taylor Swift.
00:07:26.880 Yes, the entire halftime will be filled, myself and A.I.
00:07:30.480 Taylor Swift.
00:07:31.320 And I can't wait for you all to join me.
00:07:33.640 But right now, who joins me is not, unfortunately, A.I.
00:07:36.620 Taylor Swift, but someone who's just as good looking.
00:07:38.980 It's Mike Benz of the Foundation for Freedom Online.
00:07:42.000 Benz, what have we caught ourselves into?
00:07:45.020 Because you and I have been sort of tweeting about this Taylor Swift thing.
00:07:48.500 I've been focused on the ballot operations, which is clearly coming later on in the fall.
00:07:53.880 I've said, you know, sunlight is the best disinfectant.
00:07:56.600 See the op, call the op in real time.
00:07:59.140 Let's get ahead of this and disfuse it before it gains critical mass.
00:08:04.420 You've been tweeting some stuff that you've uncovered on it.
00:08:06.760 And now the entire regime has decided to turn their cannons on us.
00:08:11.140 Why?
00:08:11.620 Why are they protecting her so much?
00:08:14.620 You know, it's amazing because they spent months before this telling us that Taylor Swift was the secret weapon for the Biden administration and that she could swing the election and that she was such a critical asset in terms of the fate of the 2024 election.
00:08:30.580 And then basically a bunch of us said, yeah, she kind of is and she's being used for this purpose.
00:08:37.040 And basically because the receipts were so damning, they went apoplectic and said, wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute, you can't repeat back to us the words that we ourselves said.
00:08:49.040 And that's misinformation.
00:08:50.840 And, you know, the surround sound on this is just unbelievable.
00:08:54.500 That Benny Johnson clip you played is absolutely classic because it's CNN, MSNBC, Variety, Forbes, Salon.
00:09:01.880 It's it's it's Wall Street Journal.
00:09:04.940 It's New York Times.
00:09:05.980 It's Washington.
00:09:06.580 It's everybody has joined forces to protect this this pop star who already has probably the biggest PR shop on the planet.
00:09:16.940 And, you know, what's what's amazing to me is is that this appears to go above and beyond the typical partisan politics of jockeying for influencers and cultural figures.
00:09:30.640 You know, to me, I consider it to be fair play for the Democrats to to try to instrumentalize folks who support them and for Republicans to try to instrumentalize, you know, country music stars or this new Snoop Dogg endorsement for Trump that just broke.
00:09:45.040 So that's normal, you know, a hard, by the way, they're losing their minds on me say me suggesting that yesterday.
00:09:51.180 I said, yeah, we should instrumentalize some people.
00:09:53.060 I rattled off some country stars.
00:09:54.320 That's like Kid Rock is out there.
00:09:56.100 What other other influencers we can.
00:09:58.120 And by the way, you know, I would go not just obviously Trump is already doing this with UFC, but go in, you know, get the pro wrestling guys if you can pick up some of that audience, NASCAR, whatever you can find, whatever you can find again, because we're talking about margin just on the political side of it, which is where my laser focus is.
00:10:14.200 You know, this is Moneyball.
00:10:15.480 We're talking about a 10,000 vote Delta in many of these swing states in Pennsylvania, my home state, your home state, also Taylor Swift's home state, by the way.
00:10:24.300 So it's all of like the Pennsylvania alumni, apparently, and Joe Biden's home state, by the way, where, you know, we're fighting over the 2024 election.
00:10:32.820 It comes down to all of us, funny enough.
00:10:34.320 And the Delta, there was only about 60,000 votes.
00:10:36.700 So, again, we're talking about marginal votes.
00:10:39.160 I'm not sitting here saying like, oh, the entire election will be decided.
00:10:43.100 No, no, of course not.
00:10:44.140 We're talking about these, the ballot harvesting operations, which will obviously be run because, and are so important now because, oh, by the way, they changed our system of elections in 2020.
00:10:53.440 Yeah, well, what's also amazing, just to dovetail on what you just said, is the amount of empirical polling work that has gone into the potential magnitude of a Taylor Swift get out the vote campaign and a Taylor Swift endorsement.
00:11:06.220 It just came out three days ago that there was this large scale study that appeared to show that a full 20 percent of Taylor Swift fans, which is basically every girl between the age of, you know, 11 and 25 in this country, would vote however Taylor Swift tells them to vote.
00:11:26.640 I mean, there was a full poll done on this, and, you know, that is a huge amount in the aggregate.
00:11:33.980 That's far larger than the margin that you just articulated around the state of Pennsylvania.
00:11:38.480 You know, but the other thing that really concerns me here is that it's not, it seems to go above and beyond simple partisan politics.
00:11:45.080 And we can sort of get into the sort of Liz Cheney Republican angle of this.
00:11:48.800 But what really started to set off my alarm was, you know, the fact that you had these NATO psychological operations panels and you had Pentagon contractors proposing that Taylor Swift could be, quote, trained to recite messaging, to spread, just to spread messaging, that she could be basically a trained instrument to recite.
00:12:10.940 Like chat GPT, like an LLM.
00:12:14.660 Right.
00:12:15.140 And we know that there's a history of this for all in all sorts of ways.
00:12:19.420 In India, there was a big farmers protest where it came out in leaked documents that Rihanna and Greta Thunberg were handed basically tweets to tweet out that they tweeted identically.
00:12:31.780 And this was a NATO psychological operations panel in 2019 that said, listen.
00:12:37.840 Wait, wait, wait.
00:12:38.520 By the way, didn't I, just on that real quick.
00:12:40.620 What didn't actually come out that, I forget which one it was.
00:12:43.360 It was either Rihanna or Greta.
00:12:44.680 It was because they tweeted out the actual instructions as well as the drafted tweet without the action.
00:12:51.760 It's so funny.
00:12:52.600 I remember that.
00:12:53.420 God bless the internet.
00:12:54.560 You know, it's like.
00:12:55.220 God bless them.
00:12:55.800 God bless them.
00:12:56.760 It's like all they need to do.
00:12:57.880 They think we're not going to be out there catching receipts.
00:13:01.300 No, and these things live forever.
00:13:02.880 It's just amazing.
00:13:03.760 And so to me, though, the Taylor Swift operation appears to go above and beyond simple partisan politics because you have institutions who are not supposed to be political who are hopping on board on this.
00:13:17.040 And not only that, you have apparently, you know, military institutions.
00:13:22.060 The fact is, you know, the woman who presented that at that NATO PSYOPs conference in 2019 worked for Graphica, which got seven million dollars from the Pentagon to for psychological operations work.
00:13:34.440 Essentially, they started the Graphica as as part of the Pentagon's Minerva Initiative, which is the psychological warfare research center of the Pentagon.
00:13:43.260 And they she's proposing to NATO that Taylor Swift can be instrumentalized to basically echo NATO talking points.
00:13:51.720 And not only that, as part of a get out the vote effort, a EU wide get out the vote effort to stop the rise of right wing populist parties who are NATO skeptical.
00:14:00.840 So you have you basically have a kind of military junta plotting in broad daylight the weaponization of the world's largest pop star in order to swing elections all across NATO countries to stop the rise of domestic political groups who might vote for a different war policy.
00:14:19.360 To me, that is the military taking control not just of the media, but of our of our civilian run government, which is frankly pretty terrifying.
00:14:27.120 And so the idea that and just to walk people through this again, right, it's it's it's very obvious that there's a lot of SEO that's been poured and a lot of equity that's been poured into us.
00:14:39.480 And people have come to me saying, well, it's it's just because they want ratings for the NFL.
00:14:43.800 Of course, they want ratings for the NFL.
00:14:45.200 Well, but when you talk about the NFL as a vehicle, the NFL has been a vehicle for left wing propaganda and left wing instrumentalization since the days of Obamacare, which, oh, by the way, was the Baltimore Ravens who were just playing Travis Kelsey.
00:15:00.500 And of course, it was it was Taylor Swift was at the Ravens Stadium.
00:15:04.340 They call it M&T Bank Stadium now when all of this went down.
00:15:08.460 It was also even before the the latest the George Floyd iteration of BLM, the Colin Kaepernick.
00:15:14.840 Right. Everybody forgets the Colin Kaepernick episode of BLM, which was the kneeling for the flag.
00:15:20.640 So when Colin Kaepernick was doing it, that was that was an exercise where it seemed like he was in the wrong at first.
00:15:26.960 A lot of America was against him. Donald Trump famously came out against him.
00:15:30.320 But who was one of the first major white players to come out on the side of Colin Kaepernick?
00:15:37.700 Oh, it was Travis Kelsey, his teammate for the Kansas City Chiefs, the same guy who's pushing the vaccination, the same guy and all of the NFL and ESPN were pushing the vaccination.
00:15:47.820 And so when I talk about the NFL and by the way, and maybe you can talk about a little bit about two minutes to the break here,
00:15:54.280 because the mainstream media has lost its grip on moving the needle in America.
00:16:00.380 That's why the regime and corporate corporate America has moved more into the sports world, the celebrity world for their political messaging.
00:16:08.820 Yeah, that's absolutely right. And the NFL has a long history with the Pentagon as well.
00:16:13.720 And, you know, I think one of the things that's been shocking for a lot of people to watch on this is seeing how woke both mainstream media and sports have become
00:16:23.760 and how demonized, you know, many of the typical sort of imagery that that that is mostly associated with 1950s sort of, you know,
00:16:35.660 white heteronormative sort of, you know, pinup classic Hollywood couples has suddenly been blessed really for the first time publicly with this Travis Kelsey Taylor Swift relationship.
00:16:49.740 I think it's jarring for a lot of people to see the media promote and a couple like that is especially in the football world and in the sort of pop culture world combined.
00:17:00.660 And you have this sort of interplay between the NFL and the Pentagon and the Pentagon's existential hysteria right now over the loss of their ability to recruit military made age men into the Pentagon.
00:17:15.820 And especially the white recruits who have dropped off after the purge of the Pentagon's basically right wing, you know, mostly white MAGA constituency after January 6th and the hysteria around wiping counterintelligence sort of patriot group associated military members.
00:17:36.780 And it's almost like, you know, you could see an interest in the Pentagon above and beyond the get out of the boat stuff with infusing the NFL with this sort of it's all about going for that that middle America market that's been totally turned off by wokeness. 0.87
00:17:53.660 And I called this out when they started running it through Yellowstone, I called it Yellowstoning because they're going for middle America again, again, the same part of America that was totally that was totally finally sold sold to and fully totally finally reached out to by the MAGA movement and by Donald Trump.
00:18:11.480 More on the Taylor Swift ballot.
00:18:14.220 Siam coming up, Mike Benz.
00:18:23.660 The Matrix is a system, Neil.
00:18:30.200 That system is our enemy.
00:18:32.500 When you're inside, you look around.
00:18:34.500 What do you see?
00:18:35.060 Businessmen, teachers, lawyers, carpenters, the very minds of the people we are trying to save.
00:18:41.900 But until we do, these people are still a part of that system and that makes them our enemy.
00:18:47.640 You have to understand, most of these people are not ready to be unplugged.
00:18:51.900 And many of them are so inured, so hopelessly dependent on the system that they will fight to protect it.
00:19:00.940 Were you listening to me, Neil?
00:19:02.980 Or were you looking at the woman in the red dress?
00:19:05.380 I was.
00:19:05.960 Look again.
00:19:06.380 Are you listening to me, Neil?
00:19:10.960 Or are you looking at the woman in the red dress?
00:19:14.800 The training video.
00:19:16.100 So we talk about the red pill.
00:19:17.100 We talk about the blue pill.
00:19:17.960 The training cycle from the Matrix.
00:19:20.800 How was Taylor Swift like the woman in the red dress in the Matrix?
00:19:26.300 And this is exactly how I've outlined it, where Neo is trying to pay attention, yet he's distracted.
00:19:33.380 He's distracted by what the simulation is presenting him.
00:19:36.940 He's distracted.
00:19:37.980 He's following along.
00:19:39.040 And then, boom, Agent Smith comes up, gun in the face, bends.
00:19:43.880 What exactly is the symbolism here?
00:19:46.060 And how are they trying to?
00:19:47.360 And how is this connected?
00:19:48.760 Well, I mean, it's kind of perfect, really, because Taylor Swift sits at that perfect dead center between the razor's edge, between conservatism and liberalism for young people.
00:20:02.340 Taylor Swift has all the traditional iconography and symbology of the sort of the Republican traditional values type woman.
00:20:12.900 You know, she has that sort of classic blonde with bright red lipstick look. 1.00
00:20:18.120 She's got, you know, wholesome country music songs and songs about, you know, young love to boys who got away or who broke her heart.
00:20:28.320 None of the swearing or even the instrumental is these sort of typical sounds of lines that tend to be more associated with left wing cultural music.
00:20:39.920 And so she has a huge amount of a fan base which listens to her from the Republican conservative side.
00:20:46.840 And if she can be used essentially to swing those young conservatives towards a towards a Democrat voting predilection or to and to be able to sort of mobilize and increase the turnout of the Democrat youth vote, then, you know, she she really is.
00:21:05.740 When you when you when you when you consider her reach in the hundreds of millions, that sort of bombshell secret weapon that that could be used to tilt an election. 0.99
00:21:15.600 If if if audiences were to fixate on her as the bright, shiny object that that that matrix clip sort of illustrates and Ben's talk about a little bit about this, this this this target, because I do see a lot of these people.
00:21:30.500 And there's yes, there's the conservative Swifties out there and the conservative Swifties NGMI.
00:21:35.040 But there's there's another group of people who are saying, well, hold on, wait a minute.
00:21:38.460 They don't particularly seem to be woke.
00:21:41.020 As you say, their aesthetics seem to be the aesthetics of middle America.
00:21:44.980 They seem to, you know, sort of embody these.
00:21:47.260 I think Michael Knowles said temperamentally conservative values.
00:21:50.700 And I think he's, you know, essentially talking about this the same type of concept.
00:21:53.880 And, you know, I've I've, of course, pointed out that they, you know, they support vaccinations and the double income, no kids, you know, unmarried, childless, you know, go go into your 30s with a series of relationships and no fruition.
00:22:07.720 And yet, you know, oh, you're going to find your six foot five Chad champion at the end of all of that.
00:22:12.060 But, you know, girl boss, feminist supremacy kind of kind of attitude. 1.00
00:22:16.020 But this really is all about kind of eschewing wokeness and going back to targeting that group of middle America.
00:22:24.860 This is what I called Yellowstoning when they started using Kevin Costner to promote these Antifa storylines in that show Yellowstone.
00:22:32.060 Then they did it with Harrison Ford in one of the I guess like the spinoffs of Yellowstone and Taylor Sheridan, who wrote, you know, the best, you know, I think unwitting Trump ad of all of 2015 was the movie Sicario.
00:22:44.800 You know, talking about the border and the cartels and Sicario, too.
00:22:47.960 And then he goes and it's like, well, you know, I've got to play the game in Hollywood.
00:22:50.880 So I'm going to throw in all this stuff and talk about how America was founded on, you know, killing the natives, et cetera. 0.95
00:22:55.880 But what they're doing, I think, is targeting this part of America that they realize that the woke or the LGBT type of messaging just doesn't reach.
00:23:06.280 Right. And what they're doing is, is they're sort of providing a soft landing for people who are aligned in terms of values in a more traditional way, in an anti-woke way,
00:23:17.740 and allowing them to essentially join the, you know, the sort of Democrat liberal axis while not fundamentally changing their core beliefs in the sense that some, you know, these there's millions of people who are anti-woke in that way or are more traditional
00:23:33.700 and who might enjoy the sort of social settings of popular music and all the cultural affinities that are associated with that.
00:23:42.600 But to be able to give them a way to essentially tell themselves that they're Democrats, because Taylor Swift is just like them, she has the same sort of, you know, goals of what kind of, you know,
00:23:56.520 she wants to date the high school, popular high school quarterback, and she wants to be able to sing and express herself and live that sort of fairytale life.
00:24:04.720 And she's just like you, except she's she's a Democrat. 1.00
00:24:07.560 So you can be too. And it sort of provides this kind of soft exit where a lot of people might say, well, you know what, actually, you know, I, I can't identify with that politically because it's so against these other strongly held values I have.
00:24:21.440 But seeing a role model like Taylor essentially look like them, talk like them, dress like them, and have those same sort of aspirations, but then simply be on the other side of the line is a very powerful tool, I think, to be able to net those people into that, into that political grouping.
00:24:38.540 But I also am not convinced.
00:24:40.860 Oh, go ahead. Go ahead. Go ahead. Finish that. 0.58
00:24:42.440 Yeah, I was just going to say, I'm also not convinced that Taylor Swift or Travis Kelsey are true believers in what they talk about when they get, of course, activated for political purposes.
00:24:53.360 You know, I mean, Travis Kelsey made more on his Pfizer contract than he did on his NFL contract.
00:24:58.240 I mean, that's that's money talking.
00:25:00.580 You know, the fact that Taylor and to your point, to your point, this is this is what I'd like to say.
00:25:05.480 And I just put this and let's let's show up this tweet from 2020 talking about the mailboxes and the mail in ballots.
00:25:10.700 And I said this yesterday in Vegas.
00:25:12.600 I'll say it again here.
00:25:13.660 This is about the machine.
00:25:15.280 This I do not care.
00:25:16.620 Right.
00:25:16.840 I literally don't care who she's dating, not dating.
00:25:19.320 What it has nothing to do with that.
00:25:21.000 This is about the ballot machine that is currently being built around her. 0.97
00:25:25.200 And oh, by the way, they used it in 2020.
00:25:28.020 Look at this.
00:25:28.860 And the fact that she's parroting this this complete hoax that Trump was going to shut down the mail system.
00:25:34.120 Do you remember this from 2020?
00:25:35.480 They said that Trump was going to shut down the mailboxes.
00:25:38.140 This was this crazy far left conspiracy hoax, yet somehow makes it to Taylor Swift's Twitter account with over 600000 likes on it, saying, Jack, I can't believe we do not want him as president.
00:25:52.780 He's going to cheat.
00:25:53.980 We must request a ballot vote early.
00:25:56.340 I mean, it's all right there.
00:25:58.040 It's all right there.
00:25:59.080 I can't believe you just pulled this up because I had this up on my own screen because I was going to read this out loud.
00:26:04.040 I'm just viewers, audience members.
00:26:08.380 I want you in your own head to now attempt to read this bottom tweet in Taylor Swift's voice.
00:26:14.820 So imagine that Taylor Swift like wrote this for a second.
00:26:18.340 Try to try to imagine Taylor Swift saying these words.
00:26:22.040 I mean, that is not how Taylor Swift talks.
00:26:39.700 That is a press release.
00:26:42.060 The perfect King's English, ineffective leadership, gravely worsened the crisis.
00:26:46.920 Can you imagine Taylor Swift ever using that language in any context?
00:26:51.200 That, to me, is language that was handed to her press release style just one month before the or I'm sorry, just three months before the 2020 election.
00:27:01.100 During that, which coincided with right when the early vote registration opened.
00:27:07.200 Yes.
00:27:07.900 So so is I.
00:27:08.840 Oh, that's a great point, actually.
00:27:10.060 Right.
00:27:10.300 Because it was the vote early.
00:27:12.000 But to me, this is an example of if she does believe it, that it's strong beliefs loosely held.
00:27:17.900 And you could imagine if there was a competing machine with more political clout or more money to throw or more favors to do for her her music distribution around the globe, that she would be 180 degrees the opposite way. 1.00
00:27:30.900 To me, this is that if somebody truly held those beliefs, they wouldn't save it for, as you said, right when right when the ballots open, they would be infused throughout the inflections of that person's career, which they are evidently not.
00:27:45.440 Which leads, you know, leads very in a straight line to the conclusion that she's basically turned on by the machine when she needs to be used.
00:27:53.040 By the way, the you know, the New York Times was actually trying to retcon this at one point and really got the Swifties upset about it.
00:27:59.000 And they were specifically focusing on her, I guess, allyship of the LGBT community.
00:28:03.760 And they were trying to say that.
00:28:05.520 And again, this is the New York Times.
00:28:07.040 OK, do not put this on post.
00:28:08.640 So when Ben's and I'm saying that what they were trying to do was to say she's always actually been a secret leftist.
00:28:14.740 And they were sort of equating supporting the left with with being LGBT, not just supporting it.
00:28:20.500 But the New York Times wrote this op-ed saying that Taylor Swift was secretly, I guess, gay or bi and that she was putting coded messages into her songs all throughout.
00:28:31.720 And this is why she couldn't get with.
00:28:33.100 This is the classic example of a retcon that you're like straight out of 1984 where they're trying to say, no, no, she's always been this way.
00:28:42.980 And here's the proof.
00:28:43.940 There's secret messages in Taylor Swift's song where that one was even too far for the Swifties.
00:28:48.380 And they were like, no, we're not doing this.
00:28:50.380 And even for left wing media, left wing media did not want that that narrative being amplified because her whole utility is being this shining example of sort of, you know, white heteronormative normativity, still having a home in the Democrat Party.
00:29:07.500 You know, I mean, there was just one of the which is the main demo that has collapsed in the past decade because of woke politics.
00:29:14.400 So they want to keep her clean and pristine in terms of her sort of heteronormative image, because that's the that's the kind of dangle bait to bring that demo back into the Democrat Party. 1.00
00:29:24.780 Right. So they were, yeah, they were kind of kind of going off the reservation, free freelancing there a little bit.
00:29:30.500 Ben, what do you got coming up with what are you working on last minute?
00:29:35.440 Yes. So, I mean, a million things right now.
00:29:37.740 So, you know, one of the things that we're continuing to track down is NATO's role in the media and over civilian run media, the sort of the complex interplay between the censorship industry, the national security state and both social media and traditional media.
00:29:53.760 So we have we have a ton of publications that we just published on my foundation's website, foundationfreedomonline.com, the censorship industry's entry into the Hispanic speaking market to censor conservative Hispanic influencers because of a fear that they're losing the Hispanic vote.
00:30:12.300 Very big stuff. Make sure you go follow Mike Benz over at Mike Benz Cyber. Go follow his rumbles. Go follow his movie watch alongs, by the way. They're really, really cool. Really interesting. Understand how our world works.
00:30:29.000 And we're going to be talking about the world and geopolitics next. Lieutenant Colonel Tony Schaefer.
00:30:33.020 Jack, where is Jack? Where is Jack? Where is he? Jack, I want to see you. Great job, Jack. Thank you. What a job you do. You know, we have an incredible thing. We're always talking about the fake news and the bad, but we have guys. And these are the guys should be getting Pulisic.
00:30:56.780 All right. Jack Posobiec here back live human events daily and folks got news for you. Traditional media crumbling. Why? Because they're hiding something and something big. People are realizing that being lied to by left and right, even by institutions they thought they could trust. But you, you've known the truth all along.
00:31:16.160 You also know that the time to prepare for what's coming right now. Get started by going to mypatriotsupply.com today. There you'll save $200 on an essential three month emergency food kit from my Patriot Supply. Over the years, my Patriot Supply has helped millions of American families prepare for emergencies. Yours should be next. Sealed inside their ultra durable packaging. Their delicious meals last after 25 years in storage and provide over 2000 calories per day. Eat right when things go wrong with these three month emergency food.
00:31:46.140 kits from my Patriot kits from my Patriot Supply. With $200 in savings, you can get enough for each family member. They deserve your protection. Go to mypatriotsupply.com and order by 3 p.m. for free same day shipping. Mypatriotsupply.com.
00:31:58.140 Well, folks, we've talked domestic 2024 politics, but I'm still not over the fact that we lost three soldiers in the Middle East earlier this week. They were the victims of an Iranian made drone by one of these Shia militias. 0.91
00:32:16.140 And the fact that this thing was able to defeat our air defense on this base, killing three of our soldiers should be a wake up call. Lieutenant Colonel Tony Schaefer joins us now. Tony, number one, why were we there? And then number two, and this is a big question.
00:32:32.980 Does the fact that these militia groups and the Houthis and everybody else now can defeat our air defense with these with these cheaply made kamikaze drones? What does that mean for our forced laydown in the region? 0.90
00:32:45.940 So they're an artifact, Jack, of the buy, with and through strategy that was successful in defeating ISIS. Remember, Obama left the door open. Remember the junior varsity? Well, it became apparent that they weren't the junior varsity. They took over huge swaths of land. And oh, by the way, we armed them. This was armed. ISIS was armed because of, you know, remember Benghazi? Weapons from Benghazi were being shipped by us.
00:33:12.820 Operation Timbor Sycamore.
00:33:15.820 There you go. So so we had to go back and win. So when Trump came in, he told Joe Dunford, chairman, the Joint Chiefs Joe Dunford, go beat ISIS. I was the guy who delivered the message, by the way, to the chairman.
00:33:26.760 I was in the meeting with the chairman when Mike Flynn texted me and said, hey, tell Joe to tell us what he needs to go and beat ISIS. OK, so we did. And we documented it. The series called Chain of Command. It's over my shoulder. It's on Nat Geo. It was very effective.
00:33:42.540 But the problem is this, Jack. Once we won, once we were done, we had troops in Syria. And there's all sorts of rationale of why they were there.
00:33:52.760 But smarter minds than me said it's time to leave. And President Trump decided and directed those troops should leave because they didn't need to be there.
00:34:01.440 We had won. We were able to help restore some level of stability to the region through returning governance.
00:34:09.820 Ungoverned space is the petri dish for terrorists. So we were able to do that. And the Kurds were our allies. 1.00
00:34:16.380 So Trump said time to leave. Well, Dunford, General Dunford steps down as chairman.
00:34:21.220 Mark Milley comes in. And Mark, amongst other things, refused to follow these orders.
00:34:26.080 Mark Esper, Secretary of Defense and Milley refused to follow directives from President Trump to pull them out.
00:34:33.440 Why was that? Well, I believe that they're still there now.
00:34:36.880 That's why we have them there is because there's ultimately a neocon imperative that they eventually want to return to going after and destabilizing Syria and trying to remove the Assad government.
00:34:50.640 That's why they're there. They're just kind of waiting and biding their time.
00:34:55.660 I was told by a senior Pentagon official, once you put army guys somewhere, they start looking for things to do.
00:35:01.380 And it's of course. So, yes, of course. So. So that's why they're there now.
00:35:06.780 And by the way, the fact that we're still there. I mean, they say that we're there for ISIS. But guess what?
00:35:11.660 So then they said they were there for ISIS, which which, as you've outlined, was propped up and really mobilized and supercharged by our funding and our arms that were supposed to be going to these these.
00:35:22.400 You remember the moderate jihadists? Yeah, no, it was moderate, moderate, moderate Islamic extremists.
00:35:27.260 Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Started started setting up their own shop and flying the black flag all over the border region.
00:35:32.220 So then we send our guys over to fight them and you have all these proxy forces.
00:35:35.880 But then we say, OK, we'll use the proxy forces to fight ISIS, then really staff up and really number up our deployment numbers in Syria and Jordan.
00:35:44.920 We've got about three thousand still there to this day, not just in this border region, but also up in the in the northeast with the Kurds.
00:35:52.240 Now you've got the situation where essentially what we're doing is that the war against ISIS has been over since twenty seventeen.
00:35:57.600 And essentially what you have is the United States forced deployment.
00:36:02.640 They're defending these proxy groups who lost in their war against Assad, not against ISIS.
00:36:09.920 And to your point, based on this false this false hope that maybe someday they can go after Assad again.
00:36:17.020 And I'm sorry, boys and girls, it just ain't happening.
00:36:19.280 But then let's get to the second. Let's get to the second point of this.
00:36:23.480 Yeah. But let's get to my second point of this, because, you know, that was all well and good.
00:36:28.820 And if you're sending reservists over there from Georgia and we're also hearing Arizona had a lot of these guys over reserve and National Guard,
00:36:35.940 because we thought that we had the air defense, that these bases were essentially impenetrable.
00:36:40.220 You remember what it was like when you were in the sandbox.
00:36:42.640 People would call you a fobbit because there was this idea that if you were on base, you were perfectly safe.
00:36:46.800 And it was only going outside the wire. You were never perfectly safe.
00:36:50.640 No. Yeah. And here's the we had periodic.
00:36:54.060 Here's the sure. But but I guess my point is these those missiles were an order of magnitude less powerful than the kamikaze drones that they have now. 0.84
00:37:04.440 So let's go through that. Yeah. So what happened?
00:37:06.660 Colonel John Mills and I were talking about this yesterday, another another another network.
00:37:10.560 But John correctly pointed out that the Iranians were able to take down one of our most sophisticated drones in Afghanistan.
00:37:16.700 They studied it. They figured out how to interfere with the signal and it brought it down and they captured it.
00:37:21.200 So they took that technology, Jack, and they developed a series of drones, to your point, that are now very effective in defeating some of our countermeasures.
00:37:28.640 Now, this this attack wasn't simply overwhelming.
00:37:32.740 They did do what we would call an over an overwhelm countermeasure attack against Assad Air Base a few weeks ago.
00:37:39.080 That one did overwhelm the defenses and were able to get in.
00:37:42.300 Several folks were injured, to include aviators, who are some of which are still here in North Carolina in hospitals because they were very nearly killed.
00:37:49.340 So that's one method being very effective, overwhelming our defenses.
00:37:53.200 They're learning from that. And secondly, in this case, the one that was used here, they were studying our local procedures.
00:37:59.180 Jack, you understand IFF, you know, indications friend or foe.
00:38:03.140 Another thing is is is is friendly lines of passage. 0.99
00:38:06.640 Basically, these drones, our drones use essentially the same static ingress, egress, egress, ingress routes and back and forth, which is stupid. 0.96
00:38:16.720 You should always change them. But people get lazy. 0.96
00:38:19.380 And so the Iranian militia studied these patterns and recognized that we always had the same drone coming back at the same time every night.
00:38:27.100 And so at some point they were able to insert their drone in there, a big one to come in instead of our drone.
00:38:33.180 And that's why you had the barracks hit in the middle of the night, because the I said it was basically piggybacking.
00:38:38.660 Absolutely. Absolutely. So that's what happened.
00:38:41.320 So, again, this isn't this isn't rocket science, Jack.
00:38:45.360 The things you and I are talking about are things that that our forces should routinely be studying to maintain an effective defense posture.
00:38:53.660 This was a failure at multiple levels, diplomatic, operational and tactical.
00:38:59.320 There's no doubt here that this could have been prevented. It should never have happened.
00:39:03.180 Well, I completely agree that this is and this is something, you know, I've been speaking to other people about it, you know, who don't have a military background and they, you know, they're they're not as familiar with the tactics.
00:39:13.640 But I guess what I what I mean to say is it's it's guys look, look at it this way. Right.
00:39:18.300 When you hear drone strike in the Middle East, the first thing you're thinking of is, oh, the Americans drone strike some group over there that were fighting.
00:39:25.620 But now all of a sudden the narrative has flipped and it's Americans who are getting drone striked in the Middle East.
00:39:32.880 That's a sea change. And that's why I said on this program the other day, the 20th century is over and the United States government needs to wake up to this fact.
00:39:41.160 Last minute. I do. And we'll go to the next. Well, no, that's the thing.
00:39:43.820 And it's like we have not prepared defensively. We use these things offensively for a long time with impunity, not recognizing that people were studying us.
00:39:51.900 People were learning. And obviously, we did not maintain our countermeasures at the same pace as our offensive capability was developing.
00:39:59.660 And now we're paying the price for it. So it's something that the Pentagon needs to go look at.
00:40:03.640 Again, Jack, some of us were critical of this. We were kind of rushing into this without understanding the full ramifications and scope of what we were doing.
00:40:11.660 And now, unfortunately, three three three three soldiers have died. I don't think this is the end of it, unfortunately.
00:40:18.280 No, I don't think so either. And we'll talk more in the next segment.
00:40:21.060 But I really do believe that they've studied our tactics. They've studied our drone launches.
00:40:25.700 They've understand they've understood this this friendly passage.
00:40:29.120 They've understood exactly how there are drones are getting on and off base.
00:40:32.300 I hope that that's going to be changing soon. But at the end of the day, our troops right now are sitting ducks.
00:40:37.780 And I don't think that a change in tactics is going to change that very quickly.
00:40:41.280 I think instead what you're going to see is overwhelming of these air defenses.
00:40:46.100 And unfortunately, that resulting in more dead soldiers while we're still there.
00:40:50.820 Lieutenant Colonel Tony Schaefer continues next.
00:40:55.660 Long hours. I'm always listening to Human Events with Jack Posobiec.
00:41:00.620 All right, Jack Posobiec back live. Human Events Daily.
00:41:02.920 2024, folks, could become one of the most chaotic and stressful years in history.
00:41:07.160 And that's why staying healthy is so important.
00:41:09.020 It's why I partnered with Strong Cell, a revolutionary NADH supplement packed with all the highest quality ingredients,
00:41:14.040 all geared towards boosting your body's cellular function.
00:41:17.320 I know this might sound confusing, but it's actually pretty simple.
00:41:19.520 If your cells are weak, everything is weak.
00:41:22.100 Think of NADH like fuel for your cells.
00:41:24.720 When your cells are healthy, every aspect of your body will be stronger and work better.
00:41:28.640 That's what Strong Cell does. 1.00
00:41:30.440 Look, I learned about this product from my buddy, Charlie Kirk.
00:41:33.300 And now Strong Cell, we know, has taken the nation by storm.
00:41:36.220 And by the way, Tanya Tay loves it too.
00:41:38.060 So I take it every day.
00:41:39.080 It helps clear out the brain fog, gives me natural energy.
00:41:41.900 And now I'm just healthier overall.
00:41:44.100 Go to strongcell.com or call and discover this life-changing product.
00:41:47.280 Right now, get 20% off your first month's order with promo code BOZO at checkout.
00:41:50.980 You're one month away from a healthier, stronger life.
00:41:53.740 Go to strongcell.com or order by phone.
00:41:56.280 Don't forget, promo code POZO, 20% off.
00:41:58.640 Strongcell.com, promo code POZO.
00:42:01.720 Let's head to girl and Tony Schafer.
00:42:03.080 We're told by the Biden administration that they are preparing a potential series of retaliatory strikes.
00:42:08.760 Tell us, in your expertise, what do you think that'll look like and what kind of repercussions could we see from it?
00:42:15.700 Look, John Kirby was asked this directly two days ago in a press conference.
00:42:19.820 What are they going to do?
00:42:20.920 What is the policy?
00:42:21.980 What are you going to do?
00:42:22.900 And he said, we're going to degrade them.
00:42:25.040 Okay.
00:42:26.000 That's worked real well so far.
00:42:27.540 And, you know, John Kirby's use of soft language tells me, Jack, that there's no serious effort to actually think this through like a chess game.
00:42:34.200 It's just like they'll continue to throw things in the direction of the bad guys.
00:42:39.940 And I'm understanding right now they're using old targeting packages.
00:42:43.680 That is to say they're basically taking and dusting things off that they know nothing's there, but they're making a good show of it.
00:42:49.960 It's kind of the equivalent, the woke equivalent of a warning shot from a police officer over somebody's head.
00:42:55.900 And John also said there's a tiered response system.
00:42:59.940 I don't even want to get into that because it would take too long to try to explain it.
00:43:03.000 In the end, it means nothing.
00:43:04.560 So what we're going to see is more completely ineffective use of massive force, expensive force, by the way, Jack.
00:43:11.460 You know, the weapon systems we have cost millions of dollars.
00:43:14.980 And yet we're going to see no response.
00:43:16.120 Which is part of their strategy.
00:43:17.640 It's part of their strategy.
00:43:18.940 They want to degrade our tomahawks.
00:43:20.820 They want to degrade our cruise missiles.
00:43:22.480 We are being degraded while we think we are degrading them.
00:43:25.940 This is the exact same thing that happened in Ukraine, by the way, when they said, oh, we're degrading Russia.
00:43:29.820 We're degrading Russia. 0.53
00:43:30.680 We're degrading Russia. 0.53
00:43:31.760 Yeah.
00:43:32.120 Who was it that was sending equipment, artillery shells, operational equipment to Ukraine?
00:43:37.300 It was all of NATO, right?
00:43:38.840 So, you know, they said that Putin had said he was going to demilitarize Ukraine.
00:43:43.920 Yeah, he demilitarized Ukraine.
00:43:45.000 Then he started demilitarizing everyone else in NATO because we were sending all of our surplus equipment over there.
00:43:50.180 Then our surplus Soviet equipment.
00:43:52.100 Then our own literal surplus active equipment and artillery shells over there.
00:43:57.100 We can't replace those things that easily.
00:43:59.100 These drones, on the other hand, they're easily replaceable.
00:44:02.200 That's by the point.
00:44:02.940 Just watch what happens when China starts doing them.
00:44:05.940 You know, the guys with the biggest manufacturing capacity on planet Earth start making massive drone swarms and surround the island of Taiwan.
00:44:13.360 Go see how fun that is and drive your aircraft carrier right up to it.
00:44:16.380 I keep I keep talking about this.
00:44:17.960 They've already bottled up the entire the entire Red Sea by doing this.
00:44:21.640 They could do the same thing to Black Sea.
00:44:22.900 They have no need to right now because there's not shipping. 0.99
00:44:25.620 But the the idea that the idea that we are going to degrade them, it's so foolish. 1.00
00:44:31.220 It's so absolutely foolish. 0.99
00:44:33.140 And by the way, it goes back to what Biden actually kind of admitted himself when he said, 0.98
00:44:37.760 are the strikes against the Houthis effective?
00:44:40.280 No, but we're going to keep doing them anyway.
00:44:43.220 Exactly.
00:44:43.620 Yeah, that is the policy on tap.
00:44:45.800 It's not effective.
00:44:46.540 We're going to do it.
00:44:47.120 Yeah.
00:44:47.700 No, to your point, Jack, we have to actually all U.S. policy, by the way.
00:44:51.880 Yeah, no, it is.
00:44:53.080 No, we have to recognize warfare is changing and the Pentagon is typical.
00:44:57.560 The generals and admirals you and I both know are trying to fight the last war.
00:45:00.880 It always happens.
00:45:01.460 All fighting the last war.
00:45:02.420 Every time.
00:45:03.480 They're always fine.
00:45:04.200 And here we are again, deja vu all over again, to quote a famous baseball coach.
00:45:08.360 So what do you what do you think is the way forward?
00:45:11.920 What should so let's say, you know, let's say Trump gets in tomorrow or you get in tomorrow.
00:45:16.540 What what what do we do with our force lay down?
00:45:19.820 What do we do to actually send a message to these guys?
00:45:23.000 Four years ago to this month, Trump had a contractor killed in Iraq by an Iranian,
00:45:29.520 and he instantly ordered the assassination of Soleimani, General Soleimani, the director
00:45:34.660 of the Quds Force of the IRGC that shut down the Iranians for years until we as a nation
00:45:41.640 decide it is a policy point to stop and cut off the hand of Iran. 0.99
00:45:47.100 And that's what the Pentagon said.
00:45:49.820 Sabrina Singh said last week as a matter of policy.
00:45:52.660 We know the United States knows that the hand of Iran is behind all these attacks. 1.00
00:45:56.000 Cut off the hand and these things will drop off.
00:45:59.340 They're not willing to do that, Jack, because they're trying to get the Iranians to sign some 1.00
00:46:02.620 bogus deal that will simply harden the path to a nuclear weapon, not prevent it.
00:46:07.160 But that's the the wackadoodle policies of this administration.
00:46:11.800 Look, and to your point, by the way, it wasn't just that President Trump was using military
00:46:17.540 responses.
00:46:18.520 And when he did, it was quite effective.
00:46:20.060 But it was also singularly targeted against individuals.
00:46:22.660 It wasn't these, you know, these widespread targeting packages that were that were going
00:46:27.920 around around the world that was directly targeted to one individual who was a key and a key leader
00:46:31.920 and a key facilitator.
00:46:33.260 That being said, he was also used at working economic packages by cutting off the funding,
00:46:38.420 which we of course know that Biden reversed right when they came back into office.
00:46:41.980 And then thirdly, it was the diplomatic package of going to the Gulf states, the Arab states.
00:46:47.340 You and I used to do interviews about this all the time, talking about how he was trying
00:46:51.080 to set up this Gulf initiative as a counter to neutralize the region.
00:46:56.400 Right.
00:46:57.060 So, yeah, the Gulf and Red Sea Accords.
00:46:59.000 I mean, we were working on that behind the scenes, you know, Jack.
00:47:01.460 One of the notable things is the economic issue.
00:47:04.020 Biden opened up the spigot.
00:47:06.040 Now, I was speaking to a former assistant secretary of defense from the Trump administration
00:47:09.920 on this yesterday.
00:47:10.380 His estimate is that we freed up or given the Iranians $100 billion to play with right now. 0.75
00:47:15.460 Think about that.
00:47:16.000 $100 billion.
00:47:16.800 We gave Ukraine $113 billion.
00:47:19.260 So, look at that.
00:47:21.620 So, we've literally funded both sides of the conflict against us regarding the Iranians,
00:47:26.860 literally.
00:47:27.680 And the first thing they should do besides go and take out some of the leaders facilitating
00:47:31.300 this, Iranian leaders in the region, which the Israelis are already doing, by the way,
00:47:35.020 they should basically restrict and stop all the funding to go to Iran.
00:47:39.660 Iran cannot act as the global terror exporter of terror if they don't have the juice to do 1.00
00:47:46.200 it.
00:47:46.480 And obviously, cut off the funding.
00:47:48.440 Trump would do that.
00:47:49.400 Go after Iranian leaders who are outside of Iran.
00:47:52.200 I'm not trying to get us into war with Iran.
00:47:53.900 I'm not saying I'm not a neocon.
00:47:55.960 I'm not trying to say we need to go bomb Iran.
00:47:57.620 I'm saying you can be as effective using very precise use of force against leaders,
00:48:03.560 making them pay a price. 1.00
00:48:05.520 Jack, these guys are cowards. 0.99
00:48:06.680 These guys are—they don't want to be the ones who are targeted. 0.99
00:48:08.860 The moment you start targeting them, the moment things start settling down, Trump figured
00:48:13.060 it out.
00:48:13.520 He understood it.
00:48:14.320 And I think that would be the way to go.
00:48:16.580 Lieutenant Colonel Tony Schaefer, where can people go to follow you, get more information
00:48:19.580 and support your work?
00:48:21.900 ProjectSentinel.com or .net.
00:48:23.600 And obviously, TSpooky on Twitter.
00:48:25.780 We follow each other.
00:48:26.600 We always interact.
00:48:27.400 And it's always great to join you.
00:48:28.500 Thanks for being here, Jack.
00:48:29.360 And having me on.
00:48:30.180 Appreciate it, Tony.
00:48:31.560 All right, folks.
00:48:32.420 We got ops upon ops upon ops.
00:48:35.360 And we here at Human Events Daily, your humble narrators, are walking you through the ops
00:48:40.320 like a safari guide through the darkest jungle.
00:48:44.460 Ladies and gentlemen, as always, you have my permission to lay it short.