A Brooklyn subway shooting leaves a woman in critical condition, a federal judge denies a request to throw out a criminal charge against Fannie Willis, a judge orders a delay in her case, and a judge strikes down a key piece of evidence in the Trump administration.
00:18:57.180I like knowing exactly where my food comes from.
00:19:00.540And with our sponsor for today's episode, Moink Box, that is from the family farms all across this country.
00:19:08.860You can help save those family farms and get access to the highest quality meat on earth when you join the Moink movement today.
00:19:14.960Moink runs their business from a town of 97 people in Newark, Missouri.
00:19:18.800And they're helping save our tradition, our values, and helping save rural America with every order.
00:19:23.240Moink delivers grass-fed, grass-finished beef and lamb, pastured pork and chicken, sustainable wild-caught Alaskan salmon straight to your door.
00:19:31.160You choose the meat delivered in every box, like ribeyes, chicken breast, pork chops, salmon fillets, and the best bacon.
00:20:21.320This was the Stormy Daniels case up there.
00:20:23.920Alvin Bragg, the very first one, the very first indictment.
00:20:26.800But then all of a sudden, and because the Fannie Willis news has been so deafening that people are really overlooking the fact that Alvin Bragg, all of a sudden, just requested a delay in his own case.
00:20:43.400You were the one who brought the case, Alvin.
00:20:45.320Why are you all of a sudden, at the very last minute, slamming on the brakes and saying that we need to have a delay?
00:20:52.620What's going on? Why is Alvin Bragg so freaked out right now?
00:20:56.800So remember, the Democrats' lawfare includes four criminal indictments.
00:21:01.660There is the Jack Smith case in Mar-a-Lago for his presidential records, Trump's allowed to have under the Presidential Records Act.
00:21:09.240There's Jack Smith's January 6th case in D.C. that's up at the Supreme Court right now on presidential immunity.
00:21:18.380There's the Georgia case that Fannie Willis completely screwed up.
00:21:21.900And then there's the Alvin Bragg case.
00:21:24.080There's George Soros-funded Manhattan DA who charged Trump for the non-crime of settling a nuisance claim and tried to take those what are bookkeeping violations and trying to transform them into felony counts against President Trump.
00:21:40.080They used a bogus legal theory to do this, a bogus legal theory that was passed over by the prior Manhattan DA, Cy Vance.
00:21:47.920The prior Manhattan U.S. Attorney, the Federal Election Commission, and then Alvin Bragg himself until Matthew Colangelo got sent from the Biden Justice Department, a top political appointee in the Biden Justice Department, to bring this zombie case.
00:22:03.100This Alvin Bragg case is the weakest, dumbest case of the four.
00:22:08.940It's like during the Kavanaugh confirmation when Michael Avenatti and Julie Swetnick bursted onto the scene and ruined the Democrats' lawfare with their just utterly absurd allegations against Kavanaugh.
00:22:20.140Now, Alvin Bragg's case is a similar case where it's just utterly stupid.
00:22:27.220So the fact that Alvin Bragg is saying, oh, we requested tens of thousands of documents from the Biden Justice Department over a year ago, magically they just turned over these documents, and we need to go through these documents, so we need to delay this case.
00:22:43.000I think they are trying to torpedo their own case here because I don't think that they want to start this Democrat lawfare and election interference with this utterly stupid case by Alvin Bragg.
00:22:54.060Well, and so there's a huge angle on this as well where, I mean, take even Stormy Daniels and Michael Cohen aside for a second.
00:23:04.840This, and it probably is pertaining to them, though, this was the investigation, these 73,000 documents, not all of which have been turned over.
00:23:13.120I think only about half of them or just under half of them, 31,000, have been turned over now.
00:23:17.480With the 73,000 total that are coming out, this pertains to the investigation that the Southern District of New York and that U.S. attorney for the SDNY, who is normally, by the way, this is a guy who's going after, like, James O'Keefe.
00:23:30.260This is the guy who goes after everybody if you've got, you know, an R next to your name.
00:23:34.220Even they said this case was a clunker and they passed on it before Alvin Bragg got in.
00:23:41.160So it stands to reason that something in these 73,000 pages is either a poison pill for the case or, as you say, it just speaks to the fact that there's no real chance that anybody in this case is going to get it across the finish line.
00:23:58.480So something in there has got Alvin Bragg scared about bringing this case to trial.
00:24:05.500I don't think Alvin Bragg ever wanted to bring this case to trial.
00:24:09.680He declined to bring this case to trial before.
00:24:13.080I think he was forced to bring this case to trial by President Biden and the Biden White House and the Biden Justice Department,
00:24:19.840because that's why Matthew Colangelo got sent to Alvin Bragg's office to resurrect this zombie case that the prior Manhattan DA, the U.S. attorney, the Federal Election Commission, and Alvin Bragg himself declined to prosecute.
00:24:34.940This is part of Biden's lawfare against President Trump.
00:24:39.280Biden has his fingerprints on every single one of these four criminal prosecutions, whether it's Matthew Colangelo with Bragg, whether it's Jonathan Su,
00:24:49.520President Biden's deputy White House counsel who waived Trump's claim of executive privilege on behalf of Biden,
00:24:55.680which led to the Mar-a-Lago raid for presidential records Trump's allowed to have under the Presidential Records Act,
00:25:01.240which led to Jack Smith's indictment for that, which led to Jack Smith's indictment for January 6th, which is not a crime.
00:25:09.460It's not a crime to object to a presidential election.
00:25:11.860It's allowed by the Electoral Count Act of 1887.
00:25:42.880Now, you mentioned the documents case, the Presidential Records Act.
00:25:46.220We did get the ruling in that as it came out.
00:25:49.400Now, my understanding of it was essentially that President Trump's team was trying to get the case completely thrown out under the Presidential Records Act.
00:25:57.060However, it seems like Judge Cannon wants to put that question before the jury rather than making the decision herself.
00:26:02.620Is that the best way to look at it or is there something else there?
00:26:39.080Well, and of course, you know, you're also dealing with someone who we are told, by the way, in a judge or in any judge who is supposed to give the defendant the benefit of the doubt.
00:26:53.000Because the last time I checked, the burden is supposed to be on the state.
00:26:56.560The burden is supposed to be on the Jack Smiths and the Alvin Braggs and the Fannie Willis's.
00:27:02.220And so when it comes down to any defendant, they have the right under our system to question all of these things.
00:27:08.140A little thing that the founders used to call, what was that phrase again?
00:28:04.800I'll change my question up a little bit.
00:28:06.740Which case do you think would, if any at this point, have the best chance of going to trial before the election?
00:28:13.380Well, Alvin Bragg's case clearly had the best trial.
00:28:16.920It's the worst case for the Democrats.
00:28:20.740But that case should have gone to trial.
00:28:22.420And actually, frankly, I think that would have propelled Trump back into the White House by several points because it's such a laughably stupid case.
00:28:32.060The Democrats know it's a laughably stupid case because now they're trying to delay that trial, right?
00:28:37.400So that's the case that could have gone to trial.
00:28:39.660Fannie Willis' case could have gone to trial, but it got gummed up with Fannie Willis' misconduct with her boyfriend down in Georgia with her illegal financial stake in this case.
00:28:50.840I think that you might see Fannie Willis trying to put the pedal to the metal on her used, broken car to try to get that case to trial before the election.
00:29:00.120But that case may not even get to trial before the election.
00:29:02.640I don't think any of these cases will get to trial before the election.
00:29:08.940This is something I just want to go back.
00:29:11.080I have to keep saying this, that we were told for a year, Mike, and a full year that these cases would destroy Trump's candidacy, that he was done, he was DOA, that we needed to find a new standard bearer.
00:29:23.880And now they're all completely falling apart.
00:29:26.620I mean, just walk me through what the sense was in D.C. about a year ago.
00:29:30.640Oh, I remember two years ago, Jack, when I was one of the only lawyers in America who would come on your show and other shows defending Trump after the Mar-a-Longer.
00:29:41.860Yeah, I mean, it was, it was, but you know what, it was the Article III project and over 3,000 media hits we've done supporting and defending Trump.
00:29:50.020The constant opinion pieces, the constant social media, back and forth.
00:29:54.400We have defended Trump since day one, and we've been pretty successful in changing public perception on this Democrat lawfare and election interference.
00:30:04.320And now the Democrats' house of cards is falling apart.
00:30:08.100Now they're going to have to try to win the election the old-fashioned way by convincing American people on November 5th that their candidate's the best.
00:30:16.020Instead of having Democrat prosecutors and Democrat attorneys and Democrat judges and Democrat juries and Democrat hellholes like New York, D.C., and Atlanta decide the election for the American people.
00:30:29.340This is why everybody needs to support the Article III project.
00:30:34.100You've got to get involved with these guys.
00:30:36.060They are the ones who stand tall when it matters.
00:31:40.100You took so much incoming for standing up for President Trump on day one to say that these charges were an absolute joke, and they are an absolute joke.
00:31:48.860Now I've got to ask you, though, because you've been giving us the foreshadowing on how all of this is broken out and how all of this has played out.
00:31:58.820Now, Trump is not just asking for presidential immunity in January 6th.
00:32:04.320They're also bringing, or I guess I would say invoking, presidential immunity as it pertains to the Alvin Bragg case.
00:32:12.820Walk me through how presidential immunity affects these cases and what you think the Supreme Court does next, as you know better than anybody else.
00:32:22.600So, members of Congress are immune from criminal and civil prosecution for their official acts.
00:32:32.700Right now, the President of the United States is only immune from civil prosecution based upon the Nixon case from 40 years ago
00:32:40.440because we've never had a former President criminally charged.
00:32:44.620And so now the Supreme Court is going to have to decide whether the President of the United States is immune from criminal prosecution for his official acts,
00:32:53.440not his personal acts, his official acts, just like members of Congress and just like federal judges.
00:33:02.700The Supreme Court is going to hear this case at the end of April.
00:33:05.880They'll probably have a decision by the end of June.
00:33:08.940And where I think the Supreme Court is going to hold, and this should not shock people,
00:33:14.660that yes, the President of the United States, any President of the United States,
00:33:18.920is immune from criminal prosecution for his official acts, just like judges, just like members of Congress.
00:33:24.560I think the Supreme Court will remand this case back down to D.C. Obama Judge Tanya Shutkin
00:33:30.800to hold an evidentiary hearing to figure out what Jack Smith in D.C. or Alvin Bragg in New York or Fannie Willis in Georgia,
00:33:39.980what they've alleged in their factual predicates for what are presidential acts.
00:33:45.280For example, Jack Smith alleged that Trump was contemplating firing his acting attorney general after the election.
00:33:53.320Well, that's clearly a presidential act.
00:33:55.240He would clearly be immune from that versus what's in his personal capacity.
00:34:00.980And so once that's decided, this will get remanded.
00:34:04.780I think there's going to be an evidentiary hearing.
00:34:06.620And then a lot of this case is going to be kicked against Trump on the January 6th case in D.C.
00:34:12.960And then we'll see what's left for trial.
00:34:15.960But the bottom line is I don't think these cases are going to get to trial before the presidential election.
00:34:20.620And then after the election, after President Trump wins, his acting attorney general will almost certainly dismiss these cases with prejudice in these federal cases and make them go away.
00:34:33.000And then Governor Kemp down in Georgia is going to have to decide whether he's going to allow this Fannie Willis criminal prosecution to proceed against the sitting president of the United States.
00:34:42.380Yeah, a lot of questions for Governor Kemp and a lot of questions for AG Carr down there because they could have done this to begin with.
00:34:55.300As far as the ruling on presidential immunity, one of the things that I've heard is that essentially the you know, one of the takes I've heard is that the court will not necessarily the Supreme Court now will not necessarily rule one way or the other on the merits of this case specifically,
00:35:11.460but instead come up with a kind of test for what is or isn't a presidential act and then send it back to the trial court.
00:35:19.440Do you think that's the case or because of this 9-0 ruling that we had recently, do you think that we might see another sweeping kind of ruling like that?
00:35:28.760I think that you're absolutely right that the Supreme Court is just going to establish that the president of the United States, like members of Congress, like federal judges, is immune from criminal prosecution for his official acts, period.
00:35:41.420That's it. Then they remand it down to Obama judge Shudkin for the evidentiary hearing, and she's going to have to take the first crack at what did President Trump allegedly do that was in his personal capacity?
00:35:52.700What did President Trump allegedly do as president of the United States in his official capacity?
00:35:57.220And then then once she makes a decision there, that's appealable to the D.C. Circuit.
00:36:02.020That's appealable to the Supreme Court.
00:36:03.660Once they shake out what's personal versus presidential, then they can get to a trial, but that's probably not going to happen unless President Trump loses election on November 5th, 2024, because this case is going to go away if President Trump is reelected.
00:36:21.020And this is why the process is so important.
00:36:23.560And that's why, thanks again, you know, for the extra time on the show today, because for people to look at this and say, oh, well, it's clearly a conflict of interest with Fannie Wois.
00:36:30.860Oh, it's clearly presidential meeting for President Trump.
00:36:37.880It matters what you can prove in court.
00:36:40.180And that's why the devil is in the details.
00:36:43.220Just like with this Chad GPT thing where people are saying, hey, we, or, uh, TikTok.
00:36:47.660This TikTok thing where people are saying, oh, you know, I want to get rid of TikTok.
00:36:50.640But, you know, we have to be very careful about what's in the fine print of all there.
00:36:54.840When it comes to these cases, the devil is in the details because people were saying, oh, there's no way Trump could get past this because, hey, you look at a jury in Atlanta, you know, Fulton County, they're going to be predominantly Democrat.
00:37:07.880A jury in D.C., predominantly Democrat.
00:37:09.680A jury in New York, predominantly Democrat.
00:37:11.500Florida, you know, the Miami district.
00:37:13.360Okay, maybe you got a chance there if you get some, you get some, some Cubans on board.
00:37:16.840But if there is a process that takes longer, right, that takes longer than the court trial to start that exceeds beyond the election calendar, now you have the ability, as you say, to push this whole thing to the right of the election.
00:38:08.060Democrats do not trust the American people.
00:38:11.200And that's very obvious because they do not want the American people to decide the president on November 5th, 2024.
00:38:17.860They want their Democrat judges and prosecutors and juries and these Democrat hellholes like New York, D.C. and Atlanta to decide the election.
00:38:26.120And that is backfiring on the Democrats.
00:38:28.120It's propelling President Trump back into the White House, just as we predicted and helped make happen at the Article 3 projects.
00:38:35.200And that is something that I'm just going to have to go back to.
00:38:40.480To all of those people who told me that picked up the phone and called Jack Posobiec and called Mike Davis and said,
00:38:50.360That's why we have to stroke all these checks for this candidate and that candidate.
00:38:54.260And we've got to have this huge drawn out, you know, primary, which I think all in, we're going to be told this thing came to about $250 million that was vaporized.
00:39:05.180That was absolutely vaporized, all predicated on these cases.
00:39:21.580And the question isn't necessarily will it die, but when it dies at this point.
00:39:27.320And so to all those guys, whether it's the managerial class in the South or the managerial class in D.C., really just the managerial class across the entire country, you lost.
00:41:03.920Sometimes you've got to try something a little different to get back to normal, and that is why Donald J. Trump will win come this November.
00:41:12.640And we're going to be doing a very special event on Tuesday night at Mar-a-Lago with our next guest coming up after the break.
00:41:46.440Tim Ballard, General Flynn, Michael Knowles, so many great speakers.
00:41:52.440And, of course, it's all being put together by our guest, John Yeff.
00:41:56.040John, tell us about the event, why it's so important to have this, and why it seems like the people don't want us to have an event where we're praying for President Trump.
00:42:25.560Because we have, in this country, a situation where it's such a clear choice, right?
00:42:32.040You have one system, which is atheistic communism, represented by President Biden or whoever the Democrats throw up there against President Trump and Democrat Republic, okay?
00:42:43.540And we should be hearing from the mouths of so many clergy and church leaders and Catholic leaders around the country that there is only one choice.
00:42:53.100And if that voice is not clear, then we need to pick up the slack, get out there, get behind President Trump, and make the case.
00:43:01.320He is the one, and there are human rights issues at stake, and we're going to show that in Mar-a-Lago on Tuesday, March 19th.
00:43:07.680And it's so clear, because we must pray that he is successful in this animating contest against neo-Bolshevism, neo-Marxism.
00:43:21.360This is communism that we are up against.
00:43:24.120It is communism of a different flavor.
00:43:26.180It's actually cultural Marxism, but the end will always be the same.
00:43:35.800What they want is revenge, and they want the ability to tear down cities and to burn cities and to tear down and arrest and lock up and do away with the people who are successful and the people who are peaceful and, oh, by the way, the peaceful who are religious.
00:43:51.200What do these groups always come for first?
00:43:53.260It's the religious and particularly the Catholics in the churches.
00:43:56.480That's why we need to make a stand right now.
00:44:00.740They do always come after—their targets are always the same, you know, whether it's a new recycled form of communism, the targets are the same.
00:44:08.360The family, the kids, the right to religion.
00:44:11.320So we're going to lay out those cases very specifically, the way we see that.
00:44:14.920You know, the weaponization of government.
00:44:16.660We cannot forget the DOJ coming after specifically Catholics, right?
00:44:23.420We're going to have Steve Friend, FBI whistleblower, elaborate on that.
00:44:27.880We're going to see the way that they've really come at hard on the abortion issue to the extreme where now we have 10 states which are trying to enshrine the right to kill whatever stage that unborn child in the womb.
00:45:36.180I hear we have an incredible person who's going to lead us off that night.
00:45:39.760His name is Jack Posobiec who's going to just lay out the case for how we've seen communism advance in the world and how it's coming into today.
00:46:38.340This is why Catholics for Catholics is so important because it's about getting out of the churches and getting into the world.
00:46:45.400And there's a lot of people that have, you know, kind of this like, they get very scared.
00:46:49.600They get very worried when you actually start doing things to call for positive change in our world today.
00:46:56.340And I also have to say, just to remind everybody and let everyone actually announce, that Real America's Voice will be covering the prayer rally.
00:47:05.360I'm not sure if it's going to be live or not yet, but that we will be able to broadcast this out so that people will be able to see what's going on.
00:47:12.460And so if you can't make it in person in Palm Beach, that, of course, you'll be able to follow along and pray along online.
00:47:18.300Absolutely. And we're getting the, you know, the hit pieces are coming already, which is a great sign that the B-17 is over the target.
00:47:27.060And we're going to keep dropping those bombs because we have to.
00:47:29.100We have an obligation for the gift that we have received in this country.
00:47:33.240And we have to be bold and clear on where we stand.
00:47:36.600And Catholics are behind President Trump.
00:47:41.420Where can people go if they want to get in, if they want to get a ticket?
00:47:44.880I understand you have a couple of the tickets left.
00:47:46.660As you say, you're expanding the event.
00:48:46.640And on Tuesday night, we will be there at Mar-a-Lago praying for the sword of St. Michael to come down and lead us into this political battle.
00:48:58.320The sword of St. Michael will be there for all of us.