00:06:00.760and he suffered internal bleeding. This isn't a game. It's not a LARP. It's not an augmented
00:06:06.200reality game and ARG or any of that stuff. No, it's not any of that. And so what have we learned?
00:06:12.240What we've learned now is that the left realizes that if we can go through this crucible,
00:06:20.280if we can go through this fight right now of getting the worst out, they're going to throw
00:06:24.980everything they can. All the TikTok pages are running. Oh, what about this? And oh, what about
00:06:29.400this? And oh, what about this? And Joe Rogan's up there crying. Oh, I can't believe they had to
00:06:34.040use an officer to arrest somebody. I don't know why they're doing it. Joe Rogan's crying,
00:06:39.080crying, crying all over Spotify. If we do this once, we'll never have to do it again.
00:06:46.360If we do a thorough job, if we do a serious job, but only if we see the job through to the end.
00:06:53.340And the left realizes this. This is the end of the line for the leftist experiment at mass migration and illegal immigration into our country to change our demographics, to change our voting, to change our economics.
00:07:07.420We're done with it. We're going to have a home again, boys. We're going to have a home again.
00:07:14.700Right back. Jack Possova, Human Events Daily.
00:07:16.420and in our way and our golden age has just begun this is human events with jack
00:07:25.560now it's time for everyone to understand what america first truly means welcome to the second
00:12:56.460Yeah, maybe because he got hit by a car six months ago and sustained serious injuries to both of his arms where, I mean, you've got very serious arteries and veins there where he needed a lot of hospital hospitalization for it.
00:13:10.720And so, yes, obviously, he's doesn't want to be hit by a car because it's four thousand pounds of metal with a combustion engine.
00:13:19.020I believe that. Yeah. Honda Pilot. Oh, not very green combustion engine there, by the way.
00:13:23.980Yeah. Well, you know, I don't begrudge, you know, people for having a lot of pilots.
00:13:28.100I begrudge them driving it. Ice officers. Yeah.1.00
00:13:31.920So this is I mean, it's not actually that surprising.
00:13:34.900I mean, once you saw the video that this officer took with his cell phone, you saw that clearly the partner of the driver, this this woman, Becca Good, committed a number of crimes just on on tape.
00:13:48.860She she revealed the existence of a conspiracy to obstruct law enforcement in that video when she talked about how she was going to be there all day.
00:13:55.540um and then she obstructed federal law enforcement in that she because she intimidated1.00
00:14:02.720through force or the threat of force the officer that's also a federal felony then
00:14:07.820she urged her uh partner to flee arrest another felony and then also urged her partner but to
00:14:15.000flee by driving which is urging her partner to commit an aggravated assault with a deadly weapon
00:14:18.960against a law enforcement officer the most serious felony of the bunch so you know in one video of
00:14:23.740the minute, you've got, you know, evidence for four distinct federal crimes. And it was sort of
00:14:29.860obvious that this woman should be charged, that she is one of the primary reasons that this entire
00:14:34.480thing happened and that Renee Good took this foolish course of action, threatened the life
00:14:39.180of an ICE officer and passed away. So she needs to be held accountable for her crimes. That was1.00
00:14:44.920obvious back then. Back on, you know, five days ago, I tweeted, quote, it is extremely important
00:14:50.400the DOJ prosecute all of Renee Good's co-conspirators. Everyone needs to understand
00:14:54.600that the only crimes committed were those by Good, her wife, at the time I thought it was her wife,
00:14:58.500her partner, and all those who aid and abetted their obstruction of law enforcement. Because
00:15:02.760that's the real story here. I mean, I think that law can serve a teaching function as well. There's
00:15:09.140a teaching function that needs to happen here, whereby we and the Trump administration teaches
00:15:15.340the general public and the left that if you drive at law enforcement and you urge others to drive
00:15:21.220drive at law enforcement and they shoot you law enforcement's not going to get prosecuted but you
00:15:25.880might and what's what's crazy about all of this is that you get and and we'll have libby evans
00:15:34.080on here in a second is there's that video now as well of becca good the partner popping up and you
00:15:41.140know this is like some weird it's it's basically the it's basically the 2026 or i should say the
00:15:47.620netflix version of thelma and louise because it's like a couple lesbians um who decide to wage war
00:15:53.280on ice officers and she's sitting there going why did you have to have real bullets because he's a
00:16:00.800real ice officer because there's real jeopardy that he's in when he's on these situations and
00:16:06.300because of people like you who keep ramming them with cars that's why yeah yeah what what did you
00:16:15.720think would happen what did you think would happen um i mean these people are in la la land and also
00:16:22.180i mean i i'm willing to give this woman a plea deal if she reveals the extent to which people
00:16:27.480taught her to do these things right like she was part of this ice watch organization and i saw some
00:16:33.180of the documentation coming out of that organization, suggesting that, you know, there's some moderate
00:16:37.960amount of risk or low risk from trying to obstruct ICE officials. What are these people doing? I mean,
00:16:43.740this is all, these people should probably be brought up on racketeering charges because what
00:16:47.560they're trying to do is they're, they're lying to people in order to get them to violate federal law.
00:17:48.320Well, because there's so many people say, oh, they're playing this weird like meta reality game of, you know, we need to be careful about the optics here.0.80
00:17:56.540And there was no, no, no, no. We need to apply the law equally.
00:18:03.660Correct. I mean, optics aside, obviously, you need to prosecute the actual violations of law that occurred.
00:18:09.780You know, I've seen some people like, why isn't there an investigation of the officer?
00:18:12.940Well, because there is no evidence that the officer committed a crime, and the evidence we do have exonerates him.
00:18:18.640So we don't need to do anything further.
00:18:20.460However, there is actually clear evidence of serious criminal activity from Becca Good, so it should be investigated.
00:18:27.200And moreover, I think these people who are worried about optics are thinking about this entirely wrong, even from the perspective of optics.
00:18:34.600the way you ensure that the optics are good is by making clear where the government's stance is
00:18:40.000and making and again this teaching function that prosecution can serve uh you know people like
00:18:45.560joe rogan may look at that and think that the potential liability or piers morgan might look
00:18:49.520at that and think the potential criminal liability lies with the officer they must be instructed
00:18:54.420they must be taught that in fact the officer did nothing wrong and the liability sorry go
00:18:59.600but the liability lies with Ms. Gooden.
00:19:02.260The reason you have laws is to set those boundaries0.99
00:19:26.760All right, folks, Jack Posobiec, we're back live here,
00:19:29.060Human Events Daily. We're talking about all of this stuff going on in Minneapolis. The criminal
00:19:33.440investigation now into the partner of the agitator who rammed her car at a police officer, excuse me,
00:19:41.040an ICE officer there in Minneapolis. Will, also, one of the things that I asked about with Andrew
00:19:46.360Branca, talked with you about off air, is this question of the felony murder rule. And, you know,
00:19:53.040So the basic concept of the felony murder rule is is that if I have this correctly, you know, I'll try to, you know, explain in English for the folks listening, is that when you are committing a crime, if and you are engaged in partners with a crime, that if a death occurs in the commission of that crime during the commission of that crime, that you are liable for that death, even if you didn't directly cause that death.
00:20:20.760So, for example, if your partner is shot and killed by police, you can be held liable under the felony murder rule.
00:20:29.380That's sort of the general idea of it.
00:20:31.600Now, when we dug into Minneapolis and the state of Minnesota, we found that Tim Walz actually defanged the state felony murder rule a couple of years ago in 2023 because most states have this.
00:20:45.140However, because this was a federal officer, that means that the federal felony murder rule would apply.
00:20:54.120And when you go to the federal statute, it actually says that murder is the unlawful killing of a human being with malice of forethought.
00:21:01.000Every murder perpetuated by a person lying in wait or listen to this committed in the perpetration of or attempt to perpetrate any arson, escape, murder, kidnapping, treason, espionage, sabotage,
00:21:14.440aggravated sexual abuse or sexual abuse, child abuse, burglary, robbery, et cetera,
00:21:19.280perpetuated as part of a pattern, a lot about children all the way, where the effect of the
00:21:27.000death of any human being other than him who was killed is murder in the first degree. So
00:21:30.720escape is actually mentioned as one of the crimes that can trigger felony murder under the federal
00:21:38.480statute. Now, Will, when she says drive, baby, drive, is that not exactly what she is she is
00:21:45.120doing? I think, yeah, she's definitely fleeing a lawful arrest. And I'm literally sitting here
00:21:50.020thinking to myself, OK, does is does the federal escape statute apply to merely fleeing a lawful
00:21:56.520arrest? Because it obviously applies to people who are like convicted criminals escaping from prison
00:22:00.880or convicted criminals escaping escaping the custody of a prison warden during a transfer
00:22:06.280or something. So, but there's an interesting question that I'm trying to figure out the
00:22:09.580answer to, and maybe I'll have it by the end of the segment of whether or not escape under the
00:22:14.340federal, you know, the federal escape statute includes, uh, fleeing from an arrest or if that's
00:22:19.860just, if that's just a different distinct crime, which is just resisting arrest or fleeing arrest.
00:22:26.540Yeah. And, and, and, and you're right. I'm sure they, they have a separate separations there,
00:22:30.820but I mean, point being though, is we're pretty close. We're very close to triggering this.
00:22:36.120isn't she she's right up on the line of it yeah we're not we're we're definitely uh looking at
00:22:42.420that now now i just asked grok this question grok i mean grok is not flawless on this but
00:22:46.360grok doesn't think so grok thinks that uh custody under the escape statute requires you to already
00:22:52.020be in confinement um so you know that that probably means that pre-arrest you're not in
00:22:58.080custody and so try it's it's a distinct crime and probably not therefore triggering the felony
00:23:01.720murder statute but i might be wrong right like this is that's just that's just ai coming at you
00:23:07.500on a specific question i don't know i think regard you know the funny thing is the felony
00:23:12.100murder thing matters but one of the things that's that's totally missing in this discussion it was
00:23:16.200totally missing on peers yesterday too and i did it too is there there was this bizarre attempt to
00:23:19.880create an equivalence between the potential mis-policy mistakes that the officer made which
00:23:25.040i don't even think he did but just even assuming for the sake of discussion it was a mistake for
00:23:29.120him to be in front of the car that police policy says he shouldn't and they're saying well well he
00:23:33.980made mistakes and so did so did she it's like no one of whom might have not adhered to a best
00:23:40.260policing practice and the other one committed multiple federal felonies there's a difference
00:23:44.860that really is is actually essential here you know if you're blaming the police officer you're
00:23:50.140blaming him for not being in the best possible position that he could be and honestly it's kind
00:23:55.200of a hard thing to blame it for because it's a bizarre situation normally when you pull people
00:23:58.440over. They aren't parked across the middle of the road, and they aren't obstructing a law
00:24:03.220enforcement investigation going on a few houses down. And what happened here? You had an aggravated
00:24:09.360assault with a deadly weapon by this woman. Oh, it's a mistake. A small act of defiance,0.75
00:24:13.960as John Stewart would put it. No, no. It's a serious felony. Aggravated assault on a law
00:24:19.520enforcement officer can land you 20 years in prison. That's no joke. That's not a small act
00:24:23.920of defiance. And, you know, I think, I mean, obviously it's a tragedy that this woman died,
00:24:29.560just like it's a tragedy that any woman dies. John Stewart said, yeah, John Stewart. Yeah.
00:24:33.820Yeah. Right. But I think it would have been another reason it would have been good for
00:24:39.400this woman to survive is so that she could have been put on trial for the serious crimes she1.00
00:24:43.200committed and put in jail. Let me, let me ask you about that because, because the point of a trial1.00
00:24:47.660here as well, and, and to be fair, look in, in that area, I think there's a real question of
00:24:53.240whether or not you could get a jury that does not commit jury nullification like we've seen in
00:24:57.380Washington, D.C. This is the same area, of course, where Derek Chauvin was charged. And that jury
00:25:03.320process was a complete joke, as we've talked about for years. And that being said, though,
00:25:07.920that being said, the fact that there should be a trial, the fact that she should be put on trial,
00:25:13.940what does what message you said that prosecution sends a message to society as a teaching moment
00:25:19.320To me, I say to the Trump administration, to everyone else out there, this is the moment you do, pun, perhaps pun intended, you do floor the gas in a legal sense, right?
00:25:34.240You say we are going to go and actually enforce all of these laws.
00:25:38.620And you certainly see Stephen Miller saying that to all federal law enforcement.
00:25:42.920Remember, you have federal immunity while in the conduct of your duties.
00:25:48.300The administration is backing them fully, and I believe they should prosecute every single person.
00:25:53.980What is it? 18 U.S.C. 111, where they're just they're in obstruction of justice.
00:25:57.680It's constant obstruction of justice everywhere. Arrest them all.
00:26:01.140Yeah, I think it's a very, very important teaching function for two respects.
00:26:04.860It teaches ICE officers that the administration has their back, that they don't have to be afraid of enforcing federal law as long as their conduct is lawful.
00:26:12.020And then the second thing is it teaches the general public and it teaches would-be obstructors of justice.
00:26:19.740Like, you know, the idea here being you act like this and you get yourself killed by failing to comply with police orders.
00:26:29.180We're not going to prosecute the ICE officer who killed him.
00:26:32.640We're not even going to investigate him because he didn't do anything wrong.
00:26:34.980but we will prosecute your co-conspirators even if it's your romantic partner who's more not only
00:26:40.800does your romantic will your romantic partner have to mourn your death if you pull a stunt like this
00:26:44.320she'll also have to fend off a federal criminal prosecution and probably go to jail for it
00:26:48.420and i think that's a really good lesson for everybody to learn will chamberlain where can
00:26:53.260people get your coordinates at will chamberlain on x and follow the article three project a3paction.com
00:26:59.080all right check them out folks right back libby emmons with a hot new op-ed about all of this
00:27:04.020human events daily jack where's jack where is he jack i want to see you
00:27:15.860great job jack thank you what a job you do you know we have an incredible thing we're always
00:27:23.320talking about the fake news and the bad but we have guys and these are the guys should be getting
00:27:28.280All right, Jack Sobek back live. Real America's Voice, Human Events Daily. And I'm just going to
00:27:34.700say it. I'm going to say it again. You people need to stop crying about the government enforcing the
00:27:41.460laws of the United States of America. We had a giant election about this. 2024, the popular vote.
00:27:49.420What signs are we holding up? Mass deportations now. What did you think mass deportations meant?
00:27:55.120vibes, essays. No, no. It meant mass deportations. The American people voted for this. And Donald
00:28:03.960Trump, when he was on that campaign trail, he talked about mass deportations every single
00:28:09.280possible chance he was given. Any interview, any stop, even when he was sitting at Waffle House or
00:28:15.440McDonald's, we're going to have mass deportations. We're going to have mass deportations. He would
00:28:19.600say it over and over and over. We need to do it. We need to do it. And they asked him, remember
00:28:24.080when they asked him what the cost was? They said, what's the cost, Mr. President? What's the cost?
00:28:28.040He said, he said, there's no cost that's too high. There's no cost that's too high because it's about
00:28:33.320keeping our country. That's why on this issue, above all other issues, we're not pumping the
00:28:40.780brakes. We're not pausing. We're not going to back down because some podcaster on Spotify is
00:28:45.140all crying about it up there. No, no, no, no, no, no. The only way out is through. We have the
00:28:51.640initiative. We are going to press the initiative. We are going to continue. The American people
00:28:57.460want this and the laws on the books of the United States of America are wanted. And by the way,
00:29:02.780by the way, if the left wants to go and abolish ICE, then by all means, by all means, introduce
00:29:08.720the legislation, go to every single state, go to every single state legislature, every single
00:29:13.460state capital, go to the federal government, introduce your abolish ICE legislation. I dare
00:29:18.540you. I dare you right now, introduce the legislation and let's see how it goes. Let's
00:29:23.620play the game. You want to play? Let's play. I'm willing to roll the dice. Are you? Libby Emmons
00:29:28.600joins us now. Libby, you've got a great op-ed up at humanevents.com all about LARPing and the goods
00:29:39.020who, by the way, Julie Kelly tells us are not legally married in any true sense. There was
00:29:46.580actually a name change certificate, but not a marriage certificate that they've been able to
00:29:50.200find in any of these states. What is LARPing and why did LARPing go wrong so badly wrong in this
00:30:00.980case? Yeah. So for all the gamers out there, they know what LARPing means. It's live action role
00:30:06.280playing. It's a word I learned from my son who is, you know, 15. But basically my supposition
00:30:12.700here is that these two women, along with many other activists, were out there playing at0.63
00:30:16.960activism. You have Becca Good, the partner of Renee Good, after the shots were fired, saying
00:30:23.740to ICE agents, why did you have real bullets? They didn't think that law enforcement was actually
00:30:29.060out there being law enforcement. They thought law enforcement was out there to, you know,
00:30:33.420larp around with these activists. And it doesn't make any sense that this is what they should be
00:30:37.760doing. But they're encouraged to do this by Democrat politicians, by celebrities who go out
00:30:42.700there wearing their pins and buttons and donate to the ACLU and then pretend that that makes them
00:30:47.520good people. And there's no reason for Americans to go out into the streets and protest law
00:30:53.620enforcement that's out there doing their jobs. And furthermore, I think it's really important to note
00:30:58.600that ICE wouldn't have to be out in the communities going door to door looking for people
00:31:03.320if the state of Minnesota wasn't LARPing as well, believing that they are not accountable
00:31:07.380to federal law. The state of Minnesota says that local law enforcement officers cannot comply with
00:31:12.760federal law enforcement actions. And that's absolutely crazy. If local cops were turning
00:31:17.460over illegal alien criminals to ICE, then ICE wouldn't be out there in the first place doing
00:31:22.700this kind of stuff. So Libby, when we talk about LARPing, the scene, I guess, or the video that's
00:31:30.560come out of this that really strikes to me on this is when Becca Good, the partner of Renee Good,
00:31:36.300is there on the street. And this has gone viral. It, it was something that came out during the
00:31:41.640wake of this, but people were so focused on the, the car ramming that they, they kind of missed
00:31:47.060this. She says, she has, she said, it was my fault. I told her to be here, but then she also
00:31:52.740added, why did it have to be real bullets? Why did it have to be real bullets? Libby,
00:31:58.540did they not ever stop to think about the consequences of their actions or are they just
00:32:05.300so wrapped up in the idea that they're fighting this quote unquote revolutionary charge and filming
00:32:12.980content for their tick tocks that they never actually stopped to think about what could
00:32:18.980happen to them because they're breaking laws and in this case committing violence
00:32:24.340yeah i don't think they didn't think about the consequences and i certainly know when my son was
00:32:28.340a newborn and there were protests and i was interested in going check it out in new york
00:32:32.260City. It was when it was Occupy Wall Street was happening. I did not go. And I did not go because
00:32:37.380I had much greater responsibilities than going to see what the idiots were doing downtown taking1.00
00:32:42.660over Zuccotti Park. So I don't think they were thinking about the consequences of their actions.1.00
00:32:47.640I don't think they thought there were consequences to their actions. I think they thought, as you said,
00:32:52.100that they could go out there, shoot some TikToks, you know, get that all set up and still get home
00:32:56.940in time for the school bus to drop the little boy off, who now, of course, is an orphan, which is
00:33:01.800terrible. And you have to think about the consequences of these things. They didn't
00:33:05.720realize perhaps that ICE is actually a law enforcement organization that is going out
00:33:10.780there doing a job, doing the job that they are mandated and required to do. They thought it was
00:33:16.680just, you know, some kind of joke. And what's interesting too is I was checking out what Joy
00:33:21.460Reed had to say about it because I always find her perspective pretty interesting. And what she said
00:33:26.880is that activists believe that these white women would be protected by their white privilege,0.98
00:33:32.340assuming that all ICE agents are just horribly racist and would shoot a black person on sight,0.96
00:33:37.660but would not shoot these white women. And so that was, I think, part of their understanding,0.97
00:33:42.260too. I think they're so indoctrinated with the bogus anti-racism narrative that they believe
00:33:48.740that their white skin would protect them from the consequences of interfering directly with
00:33:54.880law enforcement actions. So they actually believe that that's, that's such an interesting because
00:34:01.300Libby, you come from this sort of world of the left. You, you, you, they believe, right. Because
00:34:06.500in, in canonical wokeness, that if you are white, then police will let you do whatever you want,0.56
00:34:13.880because that is what they believe. And so as, as that would then follow that their whiteness would
00:34:19.500be a shield to them from any police activity. But it turns out that it's never been a shield
00:34:24.820against police activity and the same way that it turns out that skin color has never been the
00:34:30.120predicate of police behavior. It's always been the behavior of the individual predicates what
00:34:36.940a policeman's or a policeman or policewoman's behavior is going to be. And to the same point,
00:34:41.240Libby, have you seen a single one of these videos where, you know, I see it across acts all the time
00:34:48.320where someone will say, oh my gosh, there's this terrible video. There's a 17 year old in a target.
00:34:52.500There's a woman who's being drugged from a car. There's this, there's that. And then you watch
00:34:56.200the video and they're either not complying, they're obstructing, they're blocking the road,
00:35:00.680they're getting in the face of officers, they're taking swings at officers. They're always doing
00:35:05.300something and the people just lie about it. Yes, they are always doing something and the people
00:35:10.580just lie about it. And it's important to know, yes, we do have First Amendment rights. We can
00:35:15.080go out there and protest our government. We can petition our government for a redress of grievances
00:35:21.800But if you are out there and you are dallying with these lines and you are told to do something by police officers, just comply with police.
00:40:15.980And unfortunately for them, however, recent polling shows that it has become a 70-30 issue, even amongst Democrats and independents, where people do not want their daughters and the women in their lives to be put in danger with men and boys, not just in their sports and taking their spaces on athletic teams, but in their locker rooms where there are unsafe conditions for those young women.
00:40:42.780So America First Policy Institute, as you mentioned, as well as many others.
00:40:46.460And we're talking about gays, lesbians, Republicans, Democrats, all together.
00:40:51.920You saw it yesterday at the rally coming together against this and asking the Supreme Court to uphold the original intention of Title IX.
00:41:00.940Paula, talk to me now about so the one of the pieces and I'm reading some of the transcripts that are coming out of the court that they're talking about is,
00:41:10.520would this disturb laws and policies in other states that require schools to allow trans students
00:41:16.360to compete on teams that, quote, align with their gender identity? And certainly now now the DOJ is
00:41:23.560trying to say that, you know, that this wouldn't affect that, that these bans wouldn't necessarily
00:41:28.280affect those. But Paula, look, you are in Pennsylvania, which which was allowing this
00:41:34.200and is not one of the states where that is that has a ban on it. Josh Shapiro, the governor there
00:41:39.480certainly isn't going to be passing that anytime soon talk to me about what it was like to be
00:41:44.040on a team and forced to share a locker room with a biological male you know it's as horrible as
00:41:52.700people imagine it is it's not just competitively unfair to be on a team with a man who's obviously
00:41:57.640much larger I mean this was a six foot four tall individual that we're talking about but the locker
00:42:02.560room was something a lot of people didn't consider even my own parents I don't think properly
00:42:06.300understood the fact that this guy was undressing in front of us, fully intact male, had done
00:42:11.280nothing to become a woman at all, undressing in front of us, not once or twice, but 18 times per
00:42:17.260week, we were fully undressing in front of this man. And we were told that if we objected to it
00:42:21.120or had any problems with it, that we were the problem. And they told us to go seek psychological
00:42:25.580services. I mean, that's what girls across the country are being forced when this is going on.1.00
00:42:30.140And that's why the Supreme Court case is so important, not just for athletes and competitive
00:42:33.800of fairness, but also for the safety and privacy of young girls in this whole country. And that's
00:42:38.720really what is riding on this case. And that's, and that's, so that's would be my response to
00:42:43.980the blue state argument. And, and Erica, to bring you back in here, wasn't that the entire point of
00:42:49.160title nine to begin with this basic idea that, that women should have their rights protected?0.93
00:42:55.760Yes, it is common sense that women need their own sports categories in order to compete at all,0.86
00:43:01.900Because taken to the extreme, allowing young men to compete on the women's team will eventually eliminate women from competition, completely taking away their scholarships, their opportunities, their trophies, as has already happened.0.93
00:43:18.240It's the reason why women fought so hard for Title IX to ensure opportunities for our young women.
00:43:23.300As a former only high school athlete, Paula, obviously an incredible college athlete, and I just commend her for her bravery, her courage to stand up to this mob.
00:43:37.100We show that actually young athletes, young women athletes become CEOs, become leaders in business, and taking that away from them is absolutely not the intention of the law.
00:43:49.500Paula, switching back to you here, when you look at these arguments, and I know that you've been looking at the case, it does look like the Supreme Court is going to come down here.
00:44:00.540Amy Coney Barrett, Clarence Thomas getting in there.
00:44:04.720Do you think that those people supporting the trans students, did they even make their case?
00:44:12.540you know watching the arguments yesterday i felt like i felt genuinely embarrassed i mean there's
00:44:20.200no other way to explain what's going on here they even said though that they aren't prepared
00:44:25.420to define sex if we can't define sex then how are we sex discriminated should we just have an open
00:44:31.160category why do we even have women's sports if nobody knows what a woman is and the other side0.99
00:44:35.960was not able to present that in their case and so the bottom line is man is man woman is woman
00:44:40.820There's a lot of complexities going on in this case they want to bring up, but that's really what this boils down to.
00:44:45.600And if we agree that men are men and women are women, case closed, shut, women's sports are for women, let's move on.
00:44:51.560But for some reason, we have to talk in circles and pretend like nobody knows what a woman is.
00:44:57.160Well, and we really saw this as well, because in so many of the instances, they weren't really talking about athletes.
00:45:03.380They were actually getting into these biological questions.
00:45:05.820They were getting into these deep questions.
00:45:07.540Erica, why is it that the left is so beholden to this issue?
00:45:13.380Well, they are beholden to the radical side of their party, unfortunately, but they like to turn the conversation into individual circumstances.
00:45:21.360And we all have compassion for people who are confused about their gender and they feel excluded.
00:45:27.240But we cannot make laws around one individual's person or a man's feelings or a young boy's feelings.
00:45:34.380We have to make laws that are fair and equitable for everyone. And frankly, that protect the safety, sanctity and rights of our young women and girls. That's the way the law should go. That's the way I think the Supreme Court will rule on these. It will uphold states' rights to separate the sexes when it comes to athletics. But we need to go even further and ensure a clear definition of Title IX when it comes to biological sex, how someone was born, that is where they should compete.
00:46:02.400And it makes makes perfect sense to me. It seems like common sense. Paula, I wanted to know if you had thought it was interesting at all that Judge Kavanaugh, some of his comments, giving the fact that with his background, he himself was a coach of a girls basketball team.0.78
00:46:19.920you know i think it's so interesting uh when people were trying to bring that stuff up but
00:46:26.700i will say it doesn't matter who's coaching teams i've had male coaches i've had female coaches
00:46:31.220women's teams are for women men's teams are for boys it's it's such a silly argument that we're
00:46:37.840even having this conversation and the entire case hearing yesterday the one thing going through my
00:46:42.320mind the entire time was i cannot believe supreme court justices again are sitting here listening0.64
00:46:47.760to something so silly studying to become lawyers going through clerkships to sit there for a few0.93
00:46:52.340hours listening to some whiny person complain about how they don't know what a boy or a girl is0.94
00:46:56.380yeah and it's it's just amazing because they'll say well what when what background do you have
00:47:01.660and he said well he literally was the coach of a girls sports team he's like and he's now on the
00:47:06.640supreme court it's it's so uh so amazing and and just like us on this panel by the way we've got
00:47:11.260we've got poso and i'm i'm outnumbered here on my own show i i have to i have to talk to the
00:47:16.380producers about who booked this panel. I'll check that out next time. Paula Scanlon, where can
00:47:20.440people go to get access to you and your coordinates? I'm pretty big on X, so make sure to follow me
00:47:26.460there, Paula Y Scanlon. Keep up with what I'm up to. Of course, Erica Donalds. Yes, at Erica
00:47:32.820Donalds, Erica with a K and ericadonalds.com. All right, make sure you're following them both
00:47:38.680to absolute champions for their cause, which is the cause of reality and the cause of common
00:47:44.960sense. Ladies and gentlemen, as always, you have my permission to lay short.