MAY 06 2022 — TRUMP’S COVERT PLAN TO BOMB THE CARTELS
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
162.31757
Summary
A new book is out claiming that President Trump wanted to launch a missile strike at cartels in New Mexico to destroy the fentanyl drug labs. Next, the FDA has restricted use of Johnson and Johnson's COVID-19 vaccine over blood clot risks. Third, conservative app Public Square is announcing a fundraiser for pro-life pregnancy centers. And finally, a gaming journalist has decided to ask the question, "Should people kill Supreme Court justices who may have returned Roe v. Wade?" All this and more on today's Human Events Daily!
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Ladies and gentlemen, welcome aboard today's edition of Human Events Daily, powered by
00:00:05.660
Turning Point USA. Today's May 6, 2022, and in a domine. Today's top headlines, a new book
00:00:11.180
is out claiming that President Trump wanted to launch a missile strike at cartels in New Mexico
00:00:16.880
to destroy the fentanyl drug labs. Amazing. Next, the FDA has restricted use of Johnson
00:00:24.020
and Johnson's COVID-19 vaccine over blood clot risks. Oh, that's interesting. Third,
00:00:29.420
conservative app Public Square announcing fundraiser for pro-life pregnancy centers.
00:00:35.380
Fantastic. And finally, a gaming journalist has decided to ask the question, just pose the question
00:00:41.520
of whether or not people should kill Supreme Court justices who may have returned Roe v. Wade.
00:00:59.420
You've all been seeing it, reading it, hearing it, border security. Every nation has not only the
00:01:06.540
right, but the absolute duty to protect its borders and its citizens. A nation without borders is a
00:01:14.360
nation not at all. Without borders, we have the reign of chaos, crime, cartels, and believe it or
00:01:22.320
not coyotes. So President Trump, we know, obviously no fan of the drug cartels. I don't know, by the
00:01:29.980
way, if President Trump has ever watched Breaking Bad. It does occur to me that I should probably ask
00:01:35.280
about that because I feel like that would be something that he's into. I know he's a diehard
00:01:38.760
fan. I know he's a Pulp Fiction fan, but I don't know if he's ever seen Breaking Bad or Sicario or any of
00:01:46.080
these movies that are specifically in TV shows that are about this border crisis and dig into
00:01:51.400
the cartel issue. But a new book that's come out, and the New York Times has a story, Maggie Haberman
00:01:57.020
and its Secretary of Defense, former Secretary of Defense Esper, talking about this incident. He
00:02:03.120
calls it an incident. He's very, very shocked. And of course, the New York Times is very, very shocked
00:02:06.880
that President Trump suggested using a missile strike and potentially a covert missile strike.
00:02:13.620
I'm not really sure how you would do a covert missile strike because I don't know who else
00:02:17.700
you'd be using missiles here in our hemisphere, but it's what he was asking about, to go after
00:02:23.080
the fentanyl drug labs on the other side of the border and actually start taking it to the cartels.
00:02:29.000
So apparently, his idea was, why don't we just bomb the cartels? Remember, there's the same
00:02:35.240
president who suggested that why don't we just nuke the hurricanes at one point, which I still think
00:02:40.000
is an option that we should keep on the table, right? But in all seriousness, in all seriousness,
00:02:45.440
let's actually think about this for a minute. The New York Times lost their mind that President
00:02:51.940
Trump would suggest conducting a missile strike, whether it be a drone strike or whatever type of
00:02:57.540
missiles, you know, probably drones, to go after organizations that are actually killing
00:03:04.180
tens of thousands of Americans that are responsible for the highest level of drug overdoses this country
00:03:14.980
has ever seen in the entire existence of the United States of America. To use the military to actually
00:03:23.120
defend the American people. Esper lost his mind. Esper couldn't believe it. He said, no, no, no, no,
00:03:28.680
right? I guess Esper and the DOD and the Pentagon and the New York Times think it's only it's only
00:03:35.620
acceptable to conduct drone strikes on weddings in Pakistan and funerals in Yemen to go after and
00:03:45.100
we're getting all these reports now that the US military and the US intelligence community is giving
00:03:50.640
targeting data to the Ukrainians that they're using against Russian warships and potentially even
00:03:56.660
Russian, Russian, what we would call HVTs, high value targets. So generals and VIPs and that sort of
00:04:02.180
thing. And then they're saying, oh, we didn't even know that was happening. So you can use that when
00:04:07.640
it comes to a nuclear power that you're trying to wag the dog into World War Three over. But when one
00:04:15.820
guy comes along, one president and says, why don't we, why don't we bomb these people that are actually
00:04:20.700
killing Americans? Oh, no, can't possibly do that. Yeah, this is the commander in chief. He's elected,
00:04:28.600
not Esper, not the New York Times, not anyone else in the chain of command of the military is elected
00:04:36.200
to office other than the president of the United States. And there's a reason for that. He's the
00:04:41.660
commander in chief. None of you. I remember when the last guy, when President Obama was in office
00:04:46.940
and he handed over five war criminals, Taliban generals from Guantanamo Bay, who were there when
00:04:54.140
I was there, handed them over for a traitor named Bo Bergdahl. And we were sold, oh, well, it's what
00:05:01.200
the commander in chief wants. So we got to do it. This is one of the biggest scandals. Not so not only
00:05:08.180
number one, obviously, it would be a good policy to use military action against the cartels and protect
00:05:14.360
our border. Clearly, obviously. And by the way, this is something that you could probably do in
00:05:20.300
conjunction with the government of Mexico, because they don't like the cartels either. But we've
00:05:25.720
gotten to a point with these cartels and the cartel wars that are going on in that area of North
00:05:30.560
Mexico and Sonora, where they're controlling vast swaths of territory that the government of Mexico
00:05:35.980
can't even exert full control over because that's cartel land.
00:05:40.220
You can't use the military for that. You can't use the IC for that. No, no, no, no, no.
00:05:46.260
Right. Go watch Narcos. Pablo Escobar. Right. But when it comes to Ukraine, when it comes to Russia,
00:05:54.100
when it comes to Yemen, Pakistan, all of these places all around the world, Somalia, that's
00:05:58.740
perfectly fine for the U.S. military. That's the job of the U.S. military. Conducting the agenda
00:06:04.760
of the World Economic Forum in Davos, I guess, but not actually defending the American people.
00:06:14.400
So I came home from the gym the other day and put in my workout, get home. Tanya's got dinner
00:06:21.180
ready. I said, what's for dinner, sweetheart? She says, it's good ranchers. I'm like, did we still
00:06:26.440
have good ranchers left? Because I feel like we've had the same case and we've been working through it,
00:06:31.540
even with the boys. For over a month at this point, she said, sweetheart, darling, we still have good
00:06:38.620
ranchers left. And I thawed some out. I made it for dinner tonight. We've had it sitting. Now we
00:06:43.580
cooked it up, made it with some veggies, made the steak. It was delicious. It was the bomb.com.
00:06:49.720
It was fantastic. But don't go to bomb.com. Go to good ranchers.com backslash poso, of course,
00:06:55.780
to get this. Look, guys, this is amazing what they pack, the amount of stuff they pack into just one
00:07:03.600
of these cases. So it's your beef, your chicken, your seafood. It's incredible. 100% American meat,
00:07:09.380
local American farms, prime, upper choice, high X quality, ribeyes, T-bones, New York States,
00:07:15.400
strips, signature steaks, wagyu burgers, pre-trimmed, pre-marinated chicken breasts.
00:07:20.380
This is steakhouse quality right in the poso home. That's what good ranchers has. The guesswork
00:07:26.680
is out. The meat is in. So what do you do? You go to good ranchers.com slash poso, good ranchers.com
00:07:33.160
slash poso. You get 30% off and free express shipping. You're going to want that express
00:07:38.360
shipping because these, these cases are not small. They're really not. So the free express shipping,
00:07:42.500
it really takes the price down for you. So go to good ranchers.com and make sure you're using
00:07:47.840
slash poso to get it. Good ranchers. They are Christ followers and genuine Americans. Good
00:07:54.320
ranchers, American meat delivered. I would definitely take the Johnson and Johnson vaccine.
00:08:01.900
This is a vaccine that works and it only requires one dose. The Johnson and Johnson vaccine uses a
00:08:08.380
particular, what we call vaccine platform and you inject it into the body. The body sees that protein
00:08:14.280
makes it a good immune response against the entire virus. It's 72% effective in preventing you from
00:08:21.140
getting moderate to severe disease, but virtually a hundred percent protective against hospitalizations
00:08:27.560
and death as proven by this trial that was done. So I've got this headline. I want to be very careful
00:08:33.640
about this. Not, you know, mincing any words. I'm not making up anything. I'm not speaking out of turn.
00:08:40.060
This is from Fox business. The FDA has put new limits on the Johnson and Johnson vaccine due to a rare
00:08:49.040
blood clotting condition. Health officials have detected cases of the blood clotting condition,
00:08:56.760
TTS, nine of which have been fatal. Okay. That means someone died. Nine people specifically died.
00:09:08.540
The FDA has revised its emergency authorization to sharply limit the use of Johnson and Johnson's COVID-19
00:09:17.200
vaccine to a rare, but potentially fatal blood clotting condition called thrombosis, also known as TTS.
00:09:27.000
Only individuals who are 18 years of age and older who would otherwise not receive a COVID-19 vaccine
00:09:34.880
due to availability or their choice should now, uh, take the J and J one shot regimen, which means they
00:09:41.260
are restricting it to people who are under 18. The FDA center for biologics evaluation and research,
00:09:49.740
uh, put out a statement on Thursday, our actions reflect our updated analysis of the risk of TTS blood
00:09:57.860
clotting following administration of this vaccine and limits the use of this vaccine to certain
00:10:04.520
individuals. They state, we've been closely monitoring, uh, the Janssen COVID-19 vaccine and
00:10:11.240
occurrence of TTS following its administration. And I've used updated information from our safety
00:10:15.360
surveillance systems to revise the EU way. That's the emergency use also authorization.
00:10:19.800
So people died from blood clotting and the CD and the FDA working with the CDC advisory committee have now put
00:10:29.320
out new guidelines to restrict that to people under 18. So that's children. And here's my issue with that,
00:10:36.540
right? I'm not a doctor. I'm not, I'm not a scientist. I know scientists. I know microbiologists.
00:10:42.240
There's one microbiologist I know very, very well, but when it comes to this stuff, we can look at the
00:10:50.400
data ourselves. We can go to research gate. We can go online. We can find this stuff. We can look at
00:10:56.060
studies. We can look at cause and effect and we can link things. But prior to this day, if you tried to
00:11:05.440
talk about this on this program, if I tried to talk about this on Twitter, on Facebook, on Instagram, you would be
00:11:14.200
taken down. You'd be censored. You'd be put in the penalty box. You might even have your account taken away for
00:11:22.460
suggesting something that is now the official statement of the government. So we just supposed to memory hole all the
00:11:32.600
things and all of the issues that came up over the past 18 months, right? Before the government told us
00:11:42.320
that there was a problem with this particular vaccine for these particular people. And we're very clear
00:11:47.520
about that. But we weren't even allowed to ask the question. And isn't that the bigger issue that you've
00:11:54.520
got the government coming in here and you've got cities like Washington, DC, where I'm at right now,
00:11:59.680
where there are still places today that you can't go without a negative COVID-19 test or without a proof
00:12:05.820
of vaccination because it was mandated because it was mandated to live in the city to participate in
00:12:13.860
city life, right? Without having this vaccine. There are people I know that are applying for jobs
00:12:20.360
that can't even get the job if they don't have the vaccine. But now the government says, oh, by the way,
00:12:27.900
there might be an issue with this vaccine, but only if you're under 18. That does not spark
00:12:33.460
confidence. And what it also does is show us that potentially some of the people that are identifying
00:12:41.680
this issues who had been written off and silenced and attacked, perhaps were onto something.
00:12:49.420
And maybe, just maybe, there is a massive financial incentive to keep these instances
00:13:01.420
You know, we've had plenty of those moments. We received all the threats in the book. We've had
00:13:05.380
the angry Twitter journalists. But at the end of the day, it's all been fuel for us to continue
00:13:09.300
giving power back to the people, pushing against oppression in all of its forms, pushing against this
00:13:14.180
corporate oligarchy that's in bed with big government that frames this messaging in order
00:13:19.240
to hurt the average Americans that do not share their values.
00:13:22.420
So all the craziness that we're seeing lately, coming out with this Roe v. Wade, not only the
00:13:27.860
decision, but the leak, everything that led to it, these threats against the justices in their lives.
00:13:34.540
But now we're also seeing companies that are coming forward. And this, to me, like if you're
00:13:40.440
someone who's on the pro-life side, like I am, to see companies like Amazon saying that they will
00:13:45.620
pay their employees to have abortions, that they will give you money, something like $4,000
00:13:52.240
to travel if you live in a red state, to travel to another state to have an abortion procedure
00:13:57.360
conducted, right? It's insane. And by the way, we know what this is about, right? It's not about
00:14:04.060
women's rights. Amazon didn't care about that. It's about Amazon's corporate interests. Why?
00:14:08.740
Because if you have to go on maternity leave, if you have a baby, then they still have to pay for
00:14:14.080
you to go on that maternity leave. But if you don't go on leave, number one, they don't have to
00:14:19.160
pay. And number two, you're still working on the line. You're still working in the warehouse.
00:14:24.180
You're still driving the little vans around making your deliveries like you should. They want you to
00:14:29.400
make sure that you're going to work. It's not about your rights, quote unquote. It's about their
00:14:35.840
interests. It's about what's good for Amazon and their bottom line. That's what they care about.
00:14:41.880
But there is a company that is fighting back. And full disclosure, this is a company that we do work
00:14:47.060
with here at Human Events Daily that we are in partnership with. But Michael Siefert, and we just
00:14:52.420
played his quote there, he did not reach out to us. We decided to do this story because we saw this
00:14:57.500
huge announcement. Public Square, the app, has announced a fundraiser for pro-life pregnancy
00:15:04.680
centers. Corporate America has shifted away from the values that tens of millions of Americans hold
00:15:09.920
dear, remarked Public Square's CEO. In response to this statement and the potential overturn of Roe v.
00:15:15.040
Wade, Public Square will be hosting a day for life on Wednesday, May 11th, at participating Public
00:15:20.860
Square businesses throughout the country. So they're starting with places called The Coffee Co.,
00:15:24.780
The Village SD, Nini's Deli, dozens of other businesses around the country will be donating
00:15:29.360
a portion of their proceeds to local pregnancy centers. And then it says, if you are a Public
00:15:35.500
Square business and would like to participate, please email PR at PublicSquare.com. So what is
00:15:42.000
Public Square? Public Square is a company that allows a listing of other companies, right? So
00:15:48.160
they're a directory service. It's an app you download. It's super easy to use. I'm not going to give
00:15:52.980
you the full pitch, but that's the way it works, right? You download it and you say, hey, I want
00:15:56.500
to find a restaurant that only uses locally sourced food, or I want to find a coffee shop that stood up
00:16:03.080
to the mandates, that type of thing, or a bank that isn't going to cancel somebody because they have
00:16:07.440
different political beliefs or whichever situation it is that you're looking for, whatever kind of
00:16:11.980
business. But now they're actually taking a stand. They're going to say, look, if there are companies
00:16:16.180
out there and corporations that are going to be super woke or that are going to be pro-abortion,
00:16:20.400
like Amazon is clearly being here. This is pro-abortion. This isn't about pro-choice,
00:16:24.280
right? You don't get the money if you choose to keep your kid, right? Their choice is you get the
00:16:28.360
money if you want to go have an abortion. So make sure that's very clear. I'm going to say that again,
00:16:34.020
right? Amazon gives you up to $4,000 to have an abortion, but they're not giving you $4,000 to keep
00:16:43.520
your baby. So understand, it's not about pro-choice. It's about pro-abortion. Yeah, fact check me on
00:16:51.880
that. But what Public Square is doing, Public Square is saying it doesn't have to be this way.
00:16:58.600
We can have families and still have companies. We can have companies that support people having
00:17:05.120
families. And we want to do that. And so what a pro-life pregnancy center is, it's idea that we know
00:17:11.360
that life is crazy and the world is a messed up place. That's just the way it is. And sometimes
00:17:19.420
there are people who get pregnant, right? Women, obviously, who get pregnant. I want to do that
00:17:24.080
whole pregnancy people thing. There are women who get pregnant though, and it might be unplanned.
00:17:29.280
They might be at risk. There might be a million reasons to want to come to a pregnancy center,
00:17:33.500
but it's a place where women can come to get the help they need, to get the medical services they need,
00:17:40.400
free of charge, and no questions asked. There's no judgment. There's just help. That's the point of a
00:17:48.520
pro-life pregnancy center, is the idea that women can come in, get the services they need, and you're
00:17:54.960
supporting them, and you're supporting the children. So it's not just a law restricting abortion. It's
00:18:00.880
actually proactively helping women, helping their kids, and helping families.
00:18:09.000
You guys spent some time yesterday talking about what you think are the extreme wings of the
00:18:14.580
Republican Party. Do you think the progressive activists that are now planning protests outside
00:18:20.340
some of the justices' houses are extreme? Peaceful protest? No. Peaceful protest is not extreme.
00:18:28.700
Some of these justices have young kids, but their neighbors are not all public figures. So would the
00:18:34.060
president think about waving off activists that want to go into residential neighborhoods in Virginia
00:18:39.440
and Maryland? Peter, look, I think our view here is that peaceful protest, there's a long history in
00:18:45.280
the United States and the country of that. And we certainly encourage people to keep it peaceful and
00:18:50.900
not resort to any level of violence. So amid all the insanity, in terms of the response to the
00:18:57.360
potential, really likely, I think at this point, likely overturning Roe v. Wade, a gaming journalist
00:19:03.900
on Twitter named Simon Gwynn, British guy, by the way, is questioning whether you would kill
00:19:12.560
Supreme Court justices, or whether you should kill Supreme Court justices Clarence Thomas and Sam
00:19:17.500
Alito, given the chance. And I'm going to read you and be very clear what I'm doing right here. I want
00:19:22.060
to read you his tweet. I want to read you what he said. He said, an interesting real life trolley
00:19:28.440
problem in America now. If you had the chance to kill Clarence Thomas and Sam Alito, the two oldest
00:19:35.860
right wing Supreme Court justices, should you do it while Biden can get his nominees to replace them
00:19:42.320
confirmed? The end followed up with, it's an interesting abstract question, but becomes a
00:19:49.720
real conundrum if, say, you're terminally ill and have little to lose yourself, but know that it
00:19:56.160
could save many women's lives in the future. He doesn't explain how killing Supreme Court justices
00:20:03.060
would save lives of women in some sort of twisted logic that he's using there. But he posts this stuff.
00:20:11.380
He then took it down and said, oh, it's just a thought experiment. Twitter is no problem with
00:20:15.640
that. Calling for someone to directly rise up and assassinate two Supreme Court justices and then
00:20:25.740
arguing, oh, no, no, no, just a just a thought experiment. It was just kidding around. You silly
00:20:33.460
guys, what are you thinking? This is the problem right here. Blue checked, lib journalist, Ukraine
00:20:41.440
flag flying proudly in his, you know, his profile there on Twitter. No problem with saying, kill your
00:20:48.960
political opponents. And isn't that the problem right there? Isn't that the exact problem that we've
00:20:55.880
been dealing with? 2020, the summer of rage that we don't even talk about. The largest mass riots
00:21:02.360
in US history, city after city after city, the killing fields of our own major cities with the
00:21:10.200
homicide rates completely out of control in this country. Naughty peep about it. Not a single doesn't
00:21:15.380
trend on Twitter. Nightly News doesn't talk about it on the mainstream media. No, they want to talk
00:21:21.080
about stuff that's going on 5000 miles away. They don't talk about what's going on in your backyard
00:21:25.820
or in your neighborhood. And you got guys like this, that pop off and say, well, maybe we should
00:21:32.940
just kill our political opponents. I'm just kidding. It's it's it's just a thought experiment. Look,
00:21:38.380
taking a stand against political violence means taking a stand against all political violence,
00:21:44.280
from assassinations, to punching, to war, to any type of political violence. If you say
00:21:51.020
you're against it, you have to be against all of it. And the minute you open that door,
00:21:56.180
the minute you say, well, it's okay, because they're a bad person. That's when you've taken
00:22:02.840
the discussion to a place that it should never be. We can discuss things, we can talk about things,
00:22:08.700
we can argue, we can debate. And that's the point of having freedom of speech.
00:22:13.360
All right. And that's it for us human events daily for today and ends this really banner week for us.
00:22:22.120
Thank you so much for watching. Thank you so much for giving us your time. We really,
00:22:25.680
really appreciate it now more than ever. Remember, of course, our promise, our oath,
00:22:30.040
our solemn vow to all of you is to be good, be brief, be gone. Your homework for us. Leave us one,
00:22:36.080
just one of your five star reviews on Apple, Spotify, any one of your podcast apps, and share
00:22:42.340
this out with a normie friend. What do we talk about today? Former Defense Secretary Esper claiming
00:22:47.520
that Trump wanted to launch missile strikes at cartels in New Mexico to destroy the drug labs.
00:22:53.540
Next, the FDA restricting the use of Johnson and Johnson's COVID-19 vaccine over blood clot risks.
00:23:00.560
Third, conservative app Public Square announcing a fund. This is so special. Announcing a
00:23:05.960
fundraiser for pro-life pregnancy centers. And finally, pro-apportion groups calling for protests
00:23:12.620
outside Supreme Court justices' homes. And you had that crazy journalist down in the UK calling for
00:23:21.580
killing, killing the justices if you didn't like their maneuvers. All of this is going on. It's going
00:23:28.580
to come to a head next week. But before we go, it's time for today's history break. Today, May 6,
00:23:35.440
1941, was the day that Joseph Stalin appointed himself premier of the Soviet Union, specifically
00:23:44.700
his first government and where he became the chairman of the Council of the People's Commissars. Now,
00:23:51.220
World War II had already begun with the joint invasion of Poland by the Nazis and the Soviets.
00:23:57.720
That was 1939. But this, just one month before the outbreak of Operation Barbarossa, when the brutal,
00:24:05.840
murderous, communist regime was facing off against the Wehrmacht. Remember, we have to understand what
00:24:13.640
was going on in this world, in those bloodlands of Eurasia. Ladies and gentlemen, as always,