Human Events Daily with Jack Posobiec - Sunday Special： Globalist American Empire, FTX Operations and the CCP Cold War w⧸Darren Beattie

00:00:00.000 ladies and gentlemen welcome aboard to today's special sunday edition of human events daily i'm

00:00:16.760 joined today by darren beattie editor of revolver news for a discussion on where we are what is the

00:00:25.280 state of things and specifically the state of what darren has taken to use but you see this term

00:00:30.880 everywhere you started i believe you coined the phrase but i've seen it all across the internet

00:00:35.500 i've seen people mentioning this even in forums that aren't even remotely associated the gae

00:00:41.960 the globalist american empire so darren what is the globalist american empire and what is the state of

00:00:49.760 it as you see things today well first of all it is one of my uh prouder i would say the proudest

00:00:57.840 coinages that i made the globalist american empire which um uh lends itself to a very convenient

00:01:06.360 acronym and appropriate one and um so what is this indeed so what is the state of the globalist

00:01:16.180 american empire well um i think we've seen a number of blows uh according to which um a lot of the

00:01:26.840 possible alternatives to the power and preeminence of the globalist american empire have been neutralized

00:01:33.560 and um you know i guess we're we're all looking to mar-a-lago today to see you know what trump does

00:01:41.880 and how he does it but i would say it's fair to say that at least to some degree um the trump movement

00:01:49.100 has uh been if not neutralized then diminished or crippled by the collective action of the regime

00:01:57.400 and how trump responds to that remains to be seen and so that's one aspect um there was you know even

00:02:05.420 though kind of ironically trump was very explicitly opposed to cryptocurrencies and calls it a scam and

00:02:13.480 he may end up very well being vindicated by this he's actually yeah he's i remember i remember

00:02:19.540 specifically when he tweeted that out i guess it was a couple of years ago now it was in 2020 when

00:02:24.980 bitcoin was was on its way to the top of the charts everybody was talking about it became the hottest thing

00:02:30.780 during because you know what happened was everybody had had those stimulus checks during the lockdown so

00:02:35.860 bitcoin and and just crypto and the whole what they call the defi community was really taking off and

00:02:40.600 then out of nowhere here comes that you know they were calling him boomer trump with his boomer take

00:02:45.980 about crypto and bitcoin and the old dog just doesn't get it and now here we are two years later and we're

00:02:53.420 seeing the collapse of crypto and then also seeing that these this ftx group which to me looks like an

00:02:59.380 intelligence operation slash money laundering operation is completely falling apart all of

00:03:05.500 these customers left holding the bag and then that tweet has resurfaced and said well maybe he was on to

00:03:12.240 something there no and look i think he would be the first to admit that he doesn't understand it and

00:03:17.220 that's probably why he was rightly skeptical and you know despite all of the sort of caterwalling by the

00:03:25.100 crypto enthusiasts about oh it's not used properly it's a decentralized protocol and such and such and such

00:03:32.820 you need to understand how it uses you know if you don't have your keys you don't have your coins like all those

00:03:37.920 things are probably you know valid as far as i've been able to check but you have to look at sort of the reality of

00:03:45.120 of bitcoin as a kind of semi mass adopted uh product and its use cases in that context beyond you know what

00:03:55.380 people have called like nerd money or beyond the sort of more limited use cases that are confined to its

00:04:01.340 more kind of secure um uh uh use and yeah the ftx may just be the tip of the iceberg and you know we can

00:04:12.660 look at it and say this is a big scam which it obviously is um with it's a it's a big kind of money laundering

00:04:20.380 operation that gets closer to the truth and so can it be a scam and a money laundering operation at the same

00:04:27.660 time and you you really have to look at some of these things and why they're allowed to continue for as long as

00:04:33.640 they are um and you kind of you get to you get to the root of the scam and i think things like ftx and

00:04:42.140 perhaps other other crypto coins uh might be even worse especially the stable coins um we might have

00:04:52.040 just seen the very beginning of the whole kind of crypto scam unraveling in so far as crypto has been

00:04:58.960 but what's interesting is that to to your point though that it seems as though the regime was

00:05:04.500 propping up this specific uh ftx and this this uh coin exchange which has always been a rival to

00:05:10.980 binance binance was was the one that i was always familiar with as large one but they were using this

00:05:15.780 one and then giving the guy the celebrity treatment the elizabeth holmes treatment and it wasn't that he

00:05:22.120 was just um given this celebrity status but also there were exorbitant funds that were banked with

00:05:30.600 him and deposited with him that were given to pass through he's suddenly given out of nowhere this

00:05:36.980 this guy who comes in he's the son of two stanford professors and suddenly he's signing deals with the

00:05:42.840 ukrainian government in the midst of you know these massive payments that are going through i said boy

00:05:49.500 it looks like they found their new hunter biden yeah and i think it's it's very interesting

00:05:55.520 yeah that that you mentioned that and again i think the appropriate framework for this there's

00:06:01.680 an initial temptation to compare it to you know theranos with holmes but i would say theranos and 0.94

00:06:08.640 holmes that's just a straight up scam that's just sort of playing off of these old dumb and decrepit 0.83

00:06:17.800 sort of political figures but she was scamming them exactly who are who are drunk off the prospect of 0.95

00:06:27.900 quote-unquote you know women women in tech and she very um cleverly sort of um engaged uh those kinds 1.00

00:06:39.860 of delusional erogenous zones so to speak and effectively scammed people who are stupid and 1.00

00:06:48.100 it's really you know in some ways we have to give her credit for scamming fools like uh um mad dog 1.00

00:06:56.540 mattis the dog the litter box general um uh mattis but that was a straight up scam as you said she just 1.00

00:07:05.860 scammed them and that's it there was really kind of nothing more to it and so i don't think theranos

00:07:10.980 is really the right kind of framework for ftx i think the appropriate framework for ftx

00:07:16.460 is closer to something like the bcc i bank and for those who don't know what this is the bcc i bank was

00:07:28.240 a bank set up in the 70s and it had tons of scams going on through it was set up by uh allegedly set

00:07:37.920 up by a pakistani but basically newsweek believe it of all places newsweek was actually doing real

00:07:43.740 reporting then and they basically said okay every single hand that this has passed through has been

00:07:48.820 intelligence connected and so long story short there was this bank that was engaging a lot of scams

00:07:54.240 but whether it was set up by intelligence from the beginning or whether intelligence just exploited

00:07:59.400 it it was used as a conduit for iran contra and to fund various other groups and became very useful and

00:08:07.900 therefore the scam was allowed to go on for a lot longer than ordinarily it would have because it was

00:08:14.480 useful to various elements of the power structure to take advantage of that kind of vehicle and i think that

00:08:23.300 bcc i is probably the more um accurate framework to understand not only ftx but a number of other

00:08:31.640 major things that have gone on in the crypto world and the thing that you know about the uh regime and

00:08:39.860 and uh you know they don't reinvent their playbook that much no and if if something existed before and now

00:08:49.220 it doesn't exist you can pretty much bet it does exist in some slightly modified form well my favorite um

00:08:57.600 my favorite sort of take on this is that the the mainstream position on just say let's just take the cia

00:09:05.120 right and it's more than just that but let's say that so we can say well the cia was uh was lying to the

00:09:11.040 american people and spreading propaganda and conducting false operations in the 50s the 60s the 70s the 80s

00:09:18.060 the 90s and the 2000s nobody was ever fired nobody was ever held accountable but they're perfectly fine 0.93

00:09:24.460 now and if you suggest that they might be currently up to something bad then you're a crazy person with

00:09:30.440 tinfoil on your head right right no absolutely and so you can just look to history for these antecedents

00:09:37.820 and you know the bcci especially after all of the hearings sort of aired out the dirty laundry of the

00:09:45.380 intelligence community and the fbi and so forth they needed um trickier ways they couldn't just

00:09:52.080 straight up fund a lot of things because they were worried about another hearing so they needed to set up

00:09:57.840 an infrastructure uh that would sort of take a lot of their activities off the book and could uh serve as

00:10:05.660 kind of a money laundering conduit for various rebel groups and you know other projects that the

00:10:11.280 um intel world was engaged in well the most famous one for you know i think a lot of our listeners i

00:10:18.100 think the most famous one of these would be benghazi and operation zero footprint that was being run

00:10:22.620 through there this manpad operation uh going from the libyan rebels to the syrian rebels and this guy

00:10:29.960 uh the ambassador gets caught up in all of this they you know and then the the the terrorists decide

00:10:35.900 well we don't want you to be running this operation and so they attack but i always point out that

00:10:40.060 the one thing nobody of all the questions and benghazi and the movies and the hearings but the

00:10:44.180 question that nobody ever seems to get to is why was a u.s ambassador at a cia black site in the first

00:10:49.480 place right yeah it's you you run into these kinds of strange uh coincidences and um yeah so so my take

00:11:01.100 on the ftx thing is it's it's i wouldn't say it's so much intelligence in this specific case of ftx but

00:11:09.140 it serves that bcci function for major elements of that sort of clinton dnc type infrastructure it's part

00:11:19.940 of you know it's it it became appropriated as a um as a major sort of money moving vehicle for certain

00:11:30.300 nodes of the clinton dnc overworld infrastructure and uh there are probably other um crypto coins and

00:11:41.980 institutions that serve similar purpose but for other elements of the regime as well

00:11:47.340 well i couldn't agree more and and and you see this apparatus building and rebuilding and remaking

00:11:53.580 itself moving from time to time from place to place and once the clintons go away there's going to be

00:11:58.940 a new node that that essentially takes over it but the players will still remain on the table ladies

00:12:04.240 and gentlemen we're coming up on our first break but stay tuned because i'm joined with darren beady

00:12:09.100 revolver news and we're going through the state of the globalist american empire be right back

00:12:13.200 and we're back here darren beady of revolver news we're talking all things globalist american empire

00:12:20.760 darren you were just telling me about this bank bccci that was being used for intelligence operations

00:12:28.400 but there was more to that bank than just use inside the united states because if i remember

00:12:34.180 correctly weren't there cartels drug cartels in mexico and south america that were also using this bank

00:12:42.040 and our intelligence community was also essentially being involved with these cartels

00:12:48.100 nothing like that would ever happen again right no of course not um but yeah of course we're

00:12:55.080 we have relationships with the cartels and that's one of the reasons that the war on drugs is such a

00:13:02.700 um it's not a foolish prospect it's simply an ill-conceived prospect because it's you know

00:13:09.840 the question is what are you going to war against and you know these cartels have become sort of

00:13:16.860 uh parapolitical military entities unto themselves and kind of just the way we play in alliances with

00:13:24.140 nation states we do the same with cartels and some cartels have a relationship with us and some

00:13:30.260 don't and we're just talking about this great interview um and maybe you can link to where

00:13:36.360 the expert journalist in mexico is talking about how china is making inroads to the cartels

00:13:41.940 um but yeah there's been this long-standing relationship and you know it's a delicate issue

00:13:48.560 and there needs to be some way to you know support these cartels that the government is supporting

00:13:54.800 without being noticed ideally and um laundering money through banks like the bcci um that's one

00:14:02.860 way to do it and in fact you know historically um uh that's basically what happened even though

00:14:09.420 it was taken down largely by an undercover uh dea guy um as as had documented in a very entertaining

00:14:18.800 movie called the infiltrator which you're talking about with the breaking bad guy well and and this

00:14:24.260 is something that people need to understand as well and i can speak to this a little bit from inside

00:14:27.860 the intel community that or if you've ever read the story about barry seal um another great movie by

00:14:33.200 the way um with tom cruise um that 100 true by the way that even within the the intelligence community

00:14:41.420 is not one entity that there are uh there are fiefdoms there's compartments there are secrets

00:14:47.680 within secrets and uh put it to to put a blunt um name on it that the dea does not always know what

00:14:55.240 the cia is up to and the cia does not always know what the dea is up to and the dea might be trying

00:14:59.980 to take down one organization but that organization has the full backing of the central intelligence

00:15:05.460 agency and then they might start fighting back against one another or you've got a pablo escobar

00:15:10.940 situation where uh essentially it's united states special forces that take him out but they're more

00:15:15.840 than happy to let the colombians get the credit for it and so i sort of just walk back into the come

00:15:20.620 on that's nipershot um i've heard it described to me that there's there's definitely a hierarchy within

00:15:28.000 the community and dh dhs is like my impression that's like the ultimate low iq that's that's 1.00

00:15:36.100 just way out there and and that's way out there in fetterman zone dhs is fetterman zone but like

00:15:45.640 certainly when it comes to intel i mean dhs has some decent um hsi their their law enforcement

00:15:52.720 investigative angle and and custom sure they're they're you know they're fine in terms of what

00:15:57.540 they do but in terms of this level of operations no absolutely not right and so it's you know cia

00:16:03.480 naturally kind of at the top and um you know fbi and then dea and it was once described to me that

00:16:11.460 basically the function of the dea is to go after the cartels that have fallen out of favor with the

00:16:18.260 cia that's actually an incredible way to put it because uh not to confirm or deny but let's just

00:16:27.600 say yes absolutely there are times when when things like that have happened and essentially and keep in

00:16:32.940 mind at the same time look go back and look at the the case of the great whitey bulger who uh who was a

00:16:39.980 direct informant under none other than robert mueller himself before he became special counsel before he

00:16:46.420 became the director of the fbi he was up there in boston working for the doj and whitey bulger was

00:16:52.900 this this is a great way to look at it so if people understand that story um uh johnny depp movie by the

00:16:58.520 way black mass is about this where and they get into it a little bit but not into the full piece of it

00:17:04.080 that he was an informant against other gangs but in doing so his gang was given free reign throughout

00:17:13.760 throughout the city of boston united states city this is in the 70s and 80s uh to commit murders to

00:17:19.380 commit drug operations money laundering operations political corruption political bribing his brother

00:17:24.780 by the way was a state senate might still be a state senator now that i checked um all of this going on

00:17:31.680 with the full endorsement of the fbi so not just under their noses he's allowed to do this and given a

00:17:39.800 free reign for all of these other crimes why because he's going after rivals and so you'll you'll hear

00:17:46.100 this phrase within the agency of well if we can't if we can't defeat the cartels perhaps we can control

00:17:53.540 the cartels yep and it's not you know just for the purposes of controlling them to manage the violence

00:18:03.020 at the level of cartels where you know you have basically narco states like in mexico and latin america

00:18:10.920 cartels are very major players if not the absolute predominant players in the political process and so

00:18:18.400 in that sense we're you know again they're they've become sort of political proxies for a sort of

00:18:25.440 grand strategy almost you know now they're cartels that are aligned with us and they're cartels that are

00:18:31.460 aligned with china and you know we want ours to predominate and and so forth and so it's a much

00:18:39.700 more kind of complicated uh perspective than i think a lot of people view it and it involves so many

00:18:48.360 kind of interesting implications uh that you know there's this kind of relationship again with the

00:18:54.340 overworld and and the underworld and there are these fascinating sort of linking figures who serve

00:19:02.580 as the liaison between the overworld and the underworld and um you know it's so kind of my view

00:19:10.060 that the intersection of those um that's where really the interesting things happen that's where

00:19:15.880 the magic happens and that's where um a lot of the things that end up having a big impact on the world

00:19:23.520 uh happen um and that's just sort of a nice little glimpse behind the curtain and uh we don't

00:19:32.360 often get those types of glimpses so it's always interesting to pursue the implications when we do

00:19:37.480 no i agree and i think crypto and the ftx is a big deal that but let's let's tease out this line

00:19:42.720 though of of china being in bed with certain cartels because you do see the rise of the chinese 1.00

00:19:49.720 communist party and their influence throughout the world as a potential rival to the gae they 1.00

00:19:57.160 certainly presented themselves and are increasingly presenting themselves with russia and bricks as

00:20:03.700 kind of a block as an alternative right i think that's what they want to be seen as an alternative

00:20:09.640 to the gae where they're saying look um the americans these westerners they're pushing uh ideologies

00:20:17.520 they're pushing pride flags they're going to make you have pride parades in your in your town in your

00:20:23.300 city in your state capital they're going to make you make you pass all these laws that are based 0.75

00:20:28.020 around moral lines that they're pushing that may not go with your with your country we don't care

00:20:32.900 we'll offer you a line of credit we'll offer you military supplies we'll offer you weapons we'll

00:20:38.300 offer you technology and all we want in return whether you're looking at africa or uh

00:20:43.280 or i should i could say you know the pacific or the indian ocean they're looking for resources

00:20:49.460 resource extraction mineral rights they're looking for basing rights when it comes to a lot of these

00:20:54.780 island nations in the pacific and in the indian ocean obviously sri lanka is a huge deal there

00:20:59.040 with the ports at trincomalee and um and colombo that the chinese are building and so

00:21:04.820 is it possible do they have the ability to actually become a global rival to the gae uh in terms of this

00:21:16.800 or is it something where they're still building it up and they're never going to be able to attain

00:21:22.320 the critical mass that they would require that's a really great question it's a really complicated

00:21:28.640 question it's a really decisive question and you know i can't really claim to know the answer to

00:21:35.100 that i've given it some degree of thought i will say that initially i was more i wouldn't say optimistic

00:21:42.340 but i was i definitely thought that i put more weight into sort of geopolitical multi-polarity as one

00:21:50.760 vector one of the very few vectors that might be open up some opportunities politically and what i mean by

00:21:57.640 that is that some if if you agree that wokeness is sort of inextricably intertwined with uh with gays

00:22:06.880 power and prestige and then um some kind of multi-polarity geopolitically some kind of counterbalance

00:22:15.480 might serve as an infrastructure that could at least incubate something that might challenge the

00:22:21.500 dominant ideology in order ultimately to correct america and set america on the course that it

00:22:27.400 should be on um i'm much more skeptical of that view than i was just looking at what a just

00:22:37.080 disaster you know russia i mean russia was never really going to be a major player it was always

00:22:41.860 going to be a minor partner um but it's really kind of uh lost a lot of global cachet and um it's just

00:22:52.820 hard to see how how russia uh uh manages in the future long story short is china will be a major

00:23:02.660 political player but ultimately it will carve out its sphere of influence and have a defensive posture

00:23:08.040 i don't see china having any kind of ideology or worldview that could seize the attention and admiration of

00:23:15.740 the globe they simply don't have the charisma to compete with the toxic ideology of the globalist

00:23:22.580 american empire well i certainly agree with that i mean there's no there's no grandiose universalism

00:23:28.520 from china there's no innovative uh reach for the stars kind of explore the galaxy kind of charisma there

00:23:37.420 you do see that a little bit with elon musk you see that with uh some of the tech futurism that comes out

00:23:44.500 of you know i i i i hesitate to say silicon valley but i'll say certain areas of the promise of the

00:23:52.860 global tech future but at the same time i don't exactly think those guys are uh are are anyone that

00:23:59.520 we should be putting our chips on but certainly that is something that to your point uh will always

00:24:04.640 give america and the west this edge the real correction might actually be something along the lines of

00:24:11.320 if you look what elon musk is doing at twitter right now and essentially going through racking and

00:24:18.280 stacking every single employee there and if you can't hold your weight if you can't pull your weight

00:24:23.660 then he is decisively sending you to the curb darren beady let's hold it right there because we'll be

00:24:29.500 right back i want to get into more of this as we return here human events daily

00:24:33.060 and we're back here human events sunday special darren beady where we left off we were talking about the

00:24:40.300 fact that the chinese communist party xi jinping for all the power that he has within china he doesn't

00:24:46.060 seem to quite have the ability to expand and eclipse the globalist american empire at least not yet

00:24:55.140 um of course i i have one of my contentions in terms of the you know the great reset or the you

00:25:00.680 know klaus schwab and things we've talked about is that this is sort of their answer to the chinese

00:25:05.680 communist party their uh sharing of best practices from xi jinping and their ability to impose that 0.54

00:25:11.360 and impose their will on the west but at the same time it's a big argument over there there is this

00:25:16.360 huge global system but who's going to be ultimately uh the junior partner and the senior partner in terms

00:25:21.860 of that but to your point should china not actually be able to take over it and um one of the the elements

00:25:30.360 that i think we should discuss there before we turn to elon musk is this idea of telecommunications

00:25:35.180 because you've really seen the united states take this overt approach towards really going to all of

00:25:42.920 the partner nations that kind of fall within the united states sphere uh across europe to to and

00:25:48.680 europe canada australia new zealand the five eyes nations to demand that they do not work certainly not

00:25:56.140 at least at a government level with huawei or anything to do with china and you're absolutely

00:26:01.080 seeing a a falling in line of these countries in terms of that right and you know i very early on i've

00:26:10.020 always resisted the ultimate kind of meaning of this sort of beijing biden epithet because my basic

00:26:20.000 understanding for a while has been that there's essentially a consensus across all factions of the

00:26:26.120 ruling elite in the globalist american empire that we're gearing up for some kind of major cold

00:26:32.380 war situation with china we've seen it most uh pronounced in the telecommunications sphere but

00:26:39.820 we've seen other examples of it as well and um and that's just kind of the new reality shaping the 21st

00:26:49.220 century and the question is what you know what's going to happen with the third world countries you know

00:26:54.820 third world country is a cold war term meaning non-aligned countries countries either the soviet union

00:27:00.920 united states and you know the russia situation is actually you know illus you know illuminating um

00:27:09.280 maybe mostly for just how subservient europe actually is you know europe is basically from

00:27:17.080 geopolitical sense vassal state of the globalist american empire they have no real sovereignty of their

00:27:24.540 own um at least in relation to russia but china might be slightly more complicated because

00:27:31.020 again you're you're going against a lot of strong economic interests and um and basically our posture

00:27:38.760 in relation to certain key elements of chinese telecommunications is you're either with us or

00:27:43.980 you're against us it's you know it's back to george w bush in many ways in the economic sphere

00:27:50.080 and you know china um has kind of gestured toward that posture as well and so you know basically a 1.00

00:27:58.820 lot of companies a lot of countries are going to be forced to choose between china and the united

00:28:03.100 states and that's going to be a very interesting dynamic shaping the geopolitical landscape over the

00:28:09.080 next five ten years my take on the what a part of the huawei debate and this this started by the way

00:28:14.480 under trump but it's continued under under joe biden to your point was that um you know how dare you

00:28:19.720 let huawei into your country with the their 5g networks they're going to start spying on you

00:28:25.280 and the darn don't you know that's that's that's what the nsa is for only we're allowed to do that 0.87

00:28:30.800 you can't let no it's funny you know and along those lines i've said this along those lines i've had 0.97

00:28:38.020 people say oh don't you know if you do this or that you know the chinese are looking at this i say

00:28:42.660 look who would you to who would you rather have your data the chinese government or american

00:28:48.740 journalists exactly right you know yeah that's precisely right i'm not i'm not some you know

00:28:56.020 intelligence official i don't work for the state department i'm more worried about

00:29:00.200 these you know new york times journalists having my data than i am one one rogue employee at uh apple

00:29:08.080 or google or twitter who decides that they hate revolver news and they hate darren beady and

00:29:13.400 jack posobic and human events daily and all the emails suddenly just plop on somebody's hard drive

00:29:19.880 one day and all the text messages and direct messages and everything else and that's all it

00:29:24.160 would take that was all it would take as one person in china probably they probably wouldn't really care

00:29:29.600 they don't give a damn they wouldn't care one way or the other about about you me maybe a little 0.74

00:29:35.000 bit more because i i have been a little more outspoken about them but um you know when i when i look at it

00:29:40.200 though and you by the way one of the one of the key points to to bring up in this is that you do by

00:29:45.260 the way see people like george soros of of all folks come out and speak very aggressively towards

00:29:53.700 xi jinping and i wonder if american conservatives have ever taken notice of this fact to say well hold

00:30:00.380 on a second now here this is the guy who's supposedly our boogeyman he's the person who's behind

00:30:05.380 open borders he's the person behind uh the war zones he's the person behind so many conflicts

00:30:11.240 yet all of a sudden he's in complete lockstep with us in terms of xi jinping in terms of the

00:30:16.940 rise of china and my contention on that is that well sure but we we disagree for different reasons

00:30:22.380 for american conservatives it's because sure you might stand for freedom you stand for liberty you

00:30:27.040 stand for the expansion of that around the world george soros doesn't care about that george soros

00:30:31.440 cares about who's going to be in charge he cares about his power he cares about his money he cares

00:30:36.640 about his bottom line so what you're seeing there is as you were using the phrase the overstate and

00:30:42.120 the the overworld and the underworld that's an overworld fight that you're looking at um it's

00:30:48.200 more of a squabble between elites rather than you know who's going to be in charge who's senior

00:30:52.680 partner who's junior partner versus anything else in terms of it but another one of those very

00:30:58.300 interesting situations point on that yeah go ahead have a minute on soros so this this is not new for

00:31:04.960 soros in fact the in the new york times there were accusations that appeared as far back as the

00:31:12.500 tiananmen issue 1989 that's correct blaming george soros for essentially fomenting a color revolution

00:31:21.240 type scenario in china china's been actually used the term color revolution in diplomatic communications

00:31:28.080 in his public diplomacy very recently they're very aware of um the what the quote-unquote open society

00:31:37.480 as the vector for color revolution type operations and that's why china has been very smart i i say that

00:31:45.120 there's only 2.5 sovereign nations on the planet there's the united states globalist american empire

00:31:51.500 there's china and russia's a 0.5 but maybe now they're demoted to a 0.2 but one thing that really

00:31:58.860 enables china to maintain its sovereignty is its complete emphatic rejection of the open society 0.99

00:32:06.560 and it goes down to a very deep level first of all they reject american big tech you don't have google

00:32:13.260 you don't have youtube you don't have all of these vectors of sort of epistemological subversion

00:32:20.160 that the u.s uses in order or you don't have ngos which are sort of the more um obvious vectors of

00:32:28.000 these things but arguably at an even deeper level you don't even have english the english language itself

00:32:35.060 is such a natural vector for the woke poison that can only be truly communicated in english it probably

00:32:44.060 doesn't even translate into chinese and so they have that linguistic firewall as well and i've never

00:32:50.840 actually thought of that but you know having lived in china for two years being a mandarin linguist

00:32:57.100 i wouldn't even know where to begin to try to train because i always usually think of translating

00:33:03.960 chinese into english it's yeah but how do you translate kendi or first of all in in china um everyone's

00:33:13.620 pronouns are the same it's ta right so your your pronouns are for for a man it's ta and for a female

00:33:21.340 it's ta now the written characters would include an element of gender uh the male ta would have a a male

00:33:28.440 uh sort of uh they call it a side character and then uh the female would have a female side character 1.00

00:33:35.020 but in in the spoken language there is no difference whatsoever this is why if you're if you're ever

00:33:40.740 talking to someone from china that has english as a second language or asia in general you'll notice

00:33:45.880 they sometimes might mix those up a little bit because they're not used to that in spoken language

00:33:50.660 they're not used to these this idea of gendered pronouns um in terms of speech and so

00:33:56.680 even as something as basic as that no it's it's completely not able to be translated right and and it

00:34:03.280 ties into an earlier point i made about their lack of charisma and universal appeal the very same

00:34:11.360 linguistic and epistemological firewall that at least up until now protects them from the open society 0.85

00:34:20.020 and american subversion is the same thing that makes them so clumsy and ridiculous at propaganda

00:34:29.480 appealing to a global audience that's right that's exactly right yes you know and i've seen um 0.67

00:34:35.160 one of one of the the the most obvious vectors of this is through hollywood um and you may have seen

00:34:41.680 there's there's been a slew of hollywood movies where at the end china is the victor because they've gone 0.69

00:34:46.840 in and financed some movie and it and it's always ridiculous it's always completely ridiculous it's

00:34:52.560 way over the top and uh interestingly enough and i i should probably do more reporting on this but

00:34:58.000 it the amount of uh money from the chinese communist party that they've been putting in

00:35:03.560 to finance hollywood movies has actually been going down and it's actually something where i believe

00:35:10.040 that the party has looked at that as a potential failed vector they were thinking they could change

00:35:14.640 hearts and minds when it comes to china um they were trying to act as though china and you'll see

00:35:19.040 these movies where it's set in the future and china and the the ccp is just some uh some uh global 0.88

00:35:24.840 partner that's directly working in concert with the united states through the auspices of the u.n and

00:35:30.480 it's and it's ridiculous the whole thing is complete always completely ridiculous if i were advising

00:35:34.240 them it's very heavy-handed if i were advising them i would say actually there is a lot of upside to that 0.68

00:35:39.940 but they basically need to farm that out to um westerners like they need the they need the hollywood

00:35:47.180 equivalent of those british pilots who are like training the chinese that they were that they were 0.93

00:35:52.780 hiring they need to get westerners to do it because oh yeah the trainers of that you know i thought if

00:35:58.120 you know whoever did crouching tiger hidden dragon that had some cultural cachet in the united states if

00:36:05.060 they kept doing stuff like that maybe they could make some inroads but yeah for the most their hollywood

00:36:10.420 type you know bruckheimer uh blockbusters um really don't have much appeal but i will just want to

00:36:19.040 conclude with a joke and make because people talk about the pressures of china and that's why we have

00:36:23.660 you know hollywood cowtown to china but if it weren't for the uh leverage of the chinese market we would 0.88

00:36:30.620 have a transsexual james bond by now absolutely 100 they're probably keeping idris elba out of the role 0.67

00:36:37.720 as well unfortunately because i think idris elba would be perfectly fine as as as james bond i've

00:36:43.180 always said by the way uh that there's a fan theory out there that i could subscribe to where you say

00:36:47.400 well it's easy you to to explain away these issues but obviously every james bond actor is quite

00:36:52.520 different well all you need to do is just establish that the name james bond itself is an intelligence

00:36:58.360 codename the same way q is the same way m is and now you can have an entire litany of james bonds

00:37:03.960 that'll that'll completely go through but as we're as we're ending out this segment going to break i'll

00:37:07.900 throw out there a piece of trivia for everyone that believe it or not i was in a movie that had the

00:37:13.840 exact same uh martial arts kung fu choreographer as crouching tiger hidden dragon yuen wu ping so i got

00:37:21.700 to meet him and i got to work with him in china very interesting stay tuned come right back darren

00:37:25.180 be okay we're back with our last segment here darren beady now darren we we've been talking

00:37:32.700 about how russia has uh essentially de-sovereignized themselves a little bit in in the course of this

00:37:39.940 war with ukraine they've lost their leverage with europe you and i have discussed that on war room

00:37:44.960 we've been in debates on that where we've said that you know uh russia's leverage is currently lying

00:37:49.760 at the bottom of the baltic sea uh vis-a-vis uh vis-a-vis europe i think that one of the last

00:37:56.000 pieces of this is should you know and and i'm just gonna keep i'm gonna say it and i'm gonna say it

00:38:00.060 again that if if this moves right if we move towards a potential and people have have talked

00:38:05.760 about all the time a world war three type scenario that if if china and the united states if that war ever

00:38:11.540 goes from cold to hot i would much rather i would much rather have russia fighting china than russia 0.54

00:38:19.660 on china's side fighting all of us and i think that rapprochement from the original cold war that kind

00:38:25.800 of mindset yes even though it comes from henry kissinger uh would would actually serve us well

00:38:31.160 in terms of thinking about this should it ever go hot and i'm just gonna leave that there but

00:38:35.520 since we only have a couple of minutes left with you i have to get into uh one of your sites

00:38:40.960 uh most famous readers probably the most famous reader of revolver news mr elon musk uh so he was

00:38:48.600 uh and people were very very upset that he was found in text messages to be uh very very naughty

00:38:54.420 committing a lot of thought crimes by going and reading revolver news reading articles about what

00:38:59.200 would happen if elon took over twitter well it turns out that he did take over twitter and so what

00:39:04.580 you had laid out before was this idea that twitter itself even beyond any midterm election or potentially

00:39:12.400 even presidential election it it really was this center of soft power it was the center of influence

00:39:18.680 because of its power for narrative creation across the west and then along comes mr elon musk

00:39:26.660 and with his power his station he purchases it and says i'm going to set the bird free he then starts

00:39:35.980 firing uh summarily anyone who crosses him anyone who questions him in public he's going through

00:39:42.320 internal message boards and sacking anyone who disagrees with him now of course all the tech companies

00:39:47.340 are going through layoffs right now darren is elon musk right and of course we don't know what'll

00:39:52.940 happen a year from now three years from now four years from now but in your estimation is he actually

00:39:58.800 returning twitter back to that potential sandbox for freedom of speech that's a great question the

00:40:07.580 short answer is it's too early to tell but early signs have been encouraging and um the early signs

00:40:14.840 are there's a lot of activity on twitter there's a massive influx of people on twitter he's firing a lot

00:40:22.540 of people including a lot of the people in the content moderation and so i believe all of them as a matter of fact

00:40:28.980 all of them and so he's taking out the trash and a lot of us on twitter have noticed you know spike in

00:40:37.120 engagement and and we can falsely infer that that has to do with some enduring and underlying

00:40:43.740 change of their content moderation policy that's not the case it's just they have fewer people on

00:40:50.540 the content moderation uh beat and there's a massive influx of people so the combination of those two

00:40:57.660 things creates the impression that um you know the content moderation policy is fundamentally changed so

00:41:04.620 i think those things we should be optimistic about but we need to wait and see what he does with certain key

00:41:11.920 major personnel decisions that will um materialize over the next couple months and see where the sort of

00:41:20.160 more permanent content moderation policy actually equilibrates because he's sort of a b testing a bunch of

00:41:27.200 different things um so that's why i would say we need want to be optimistic but cautiously optimistic

00:41:33.760 praise him when he moves in the right direction and um mock and criticize him when he moves in the wrong

00:41:41.660 direction you know i i remember it actually just occurred to me that one of his one of his text

00:41:47.400 messages and i believe this was the jack dorsey was they were asking who would you put in charge

00:41:52.740 of content moderation and his response very interestingly was to say a blake masters type well um it turns out

00:42:01.900 that blake masters finds himself uh as a free agent right now so that might even be a potential role for

00:42:07.740 him indeed no it could end up being a blessing in disguise i don't know if that's you know ultimately

00:42:14.740 going to happen but i hope that uh you know elon is not overly sensitive to having somebody who is

00:42:22.800 adjacent to the right and i'm totally happy with anyone who's free speech but most people these days

00:42:30.340 who are pro free speech are you you know unless there's some person who's secretly free speech

00:42:36.480 who it publicly seems to be a leftist he's going to take some incoming for senior major personnel

00:42:43.160 decisions he just has to be prepared for that and not going we miss about being associated with

00:42:49.440 the the right well and and and you see that with elon right you do actually see that because

00:42:55.420 elon and and and his his his uh even though he's got great friends like mr mr lex friedman who i know

00:43:02.600 is just one of your all-time favorite podcasters you wake up every morning and see what lex is up to

00:43:08.560 i i i hear that he's thinking about making it a condition of verification procedure that you have

00:43:15.980 to watch at least five episodes of at least five and with a with a test afterwards yeah this has been

00:43:22.820 by the way for those for the folks not listening this is sort of a long-standing uh inside joke

00:43:26.860 between me and darren because it it seems as though the the the youtube algorithm is just force feeding

00:43:32.080 lex friedman every time you go to try to watch something i i think i tweeted the other day i forget

00:43:36.880 if i sent it to you darren but uh um i can't wait for the lex friedman interview with sam bankman free

00:43:42.320 i'm surprised he hasn't even done one i bet he's done i was actually surprised i was surprised that

00:43:49.060 you would think that because he gets the you know and again this goes back to to lex having this um

00:43:54.980 this penchant for bringing on these huge uh controversial figures and sure he'll he'll rake

00:44:01.380 kanye over the coals but then he'll bring on the ceo of pfizer and won't even ask him if the vaccine

00:44:06.800 stops the spread uh and doesn't ask him any serious hard questions he just sort of he does exactly what

00:44:13.200 he says and you're what he's told to do and gets a pat on the head and goes on his way and uh and i i i

00:44:18.980 think elon's been on a few times so that's why i bring it up but you know when you're also looking

00:44:23.740 at at elon and you you mentioned before about how the chinese communist party doesn't have the charisma

00:44:29.540 to sort of uh just just just capture the imaginations of the west well elon musk certainly does

00:44:38.220 and i i would argue that by and large he has and i think that there are a huge swath of people family

00:44:44.540 members i know friends of mine from growing up even who are not interested in politics they're not

00:44:49.040 interested in partisanship but they do follow elon and they follow sort of this joe rogan bit um

00:44:57.740 you know barstool is kind of involved in that a little bit and when you look at those folks

00:45:05.000 following elon and elon says look i'm getting rid of the trash because not because it is woke but

00:45:11.300 because it is getting in the way of efficiency and because this has nothing to do with running

00:45:16.580 the business i mean that sounds to me like a very traditional generation x sort of motif

00:45:23.980 of we're just about business and the other stuff has to fall by the wayside

00:45:28.360 yes i mean i i think that that sort of technocratic approach um can be helpful um in terms of

00:45:42.320 riding or circumnavigating if not transcending certain uh you know political controversies

00:45:50.300 but i think there's there's limited that that has its limits because ultimately if you become

00:45:58.500 a real threat to the system the threat system is going to do everything it can to make you toxic

00:46:04.700 and so it's not like this static situation where for instance you know any sort of um you know barstool

00:46:15.140 type is you know simply you know has broader appeal by the nature of who they are you know once they

00:46:22.420 step outside of barstool talking points and barstool mindset and actually challenge the regime then

00:46:30.160 they become something different and face different types of um attacks and so um it's look at me bro

00:46:38.180 i'm i'm being subversive i'm i've got a fantasy football team i'm betting on sports right of course

00:46:44.860 you know that and and and and i'm not one of those folks who's like i'm gonna attack someone for

00:46:48.660 following sports but just understand that you you are not uh changing anything you're not you're not

00:46:55.200 uh changing anything to do with the system by by just you playing along with these barstool games you're

00:47:01.360 not right right and and so i guess the the point here is yes we notice that there are these groups

00:47:10.040 sort of like intellectual dark web and so forth that seem to have more purchase in sort of elite

00:47:16.940 sectors and there's something to that like the sociology of it um there was something sort of down

00:47:23.200 scale about maga that you know a lot of the elites would scoff at and so branding in this respect

00:47:30.080 makes a difference but i think people can overestimate that and um and ultimately it's the

00:47:37.120 substance that matters and if you're a substantive threat to the regime no matter what kind of superficial

00:47:45.080 um trappings you have um you're going to face what i call the pain box and elon's no exception

00:47:54.500 and his story is is not written yet it remains to be seen just how much of a challenge and threat

00:48:02.180 he is and he's still in this kind of game of footsie just seeing how he's going to position himself

00:48:09.420 and from the regime's side they're probably thinking oh is this you know do we destroy him or do we try

00:48:16.760 to co-opt and right now they're probably still in co-op mode and that's why they're not playing hardball

00:48:22.820 couldn't agree more darren we are just about out of time i want to encourage everyone go and follow

00:48:28.040 revolver.news follow darren everywhere he is listen to every word he says write it down read it before

00:48:34.260 you go to bed just make sure you're following darren thank you so much for joining us thank you so much

00:48:39.040 for being generous with our listeners and with your time darren beattie revolver news thank you very

00:48:43.780 much thank you jack ladies and gentlemen as always you have my permission to lay ashore

00:48:52.820 thanks

Human Events Daily with Jack Posobiec - November 20, 2022

Sunday Special： Globalist American Empire, FTX Operations and the CCP Cold War w⧸Darren Beattie

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript