Human Events Daily with Jack Posobiec - SUNDAY SPECIAL： JANUARY 6TH RETROSPECTIVE WITH DARREN BEATTIE

00:00:00.000 Ladies and gentlemen, welcome aboard to this edition of Human Events Sunday Special.

00:00:05.600 January 6th has been in the news because there's new footage finally at long last released to us.

00:00:12.840 We are going to go through all of that.

00:00:14.900 And who better to bring on than Mr. Darren Beattie himself.

00:00:18.920 But first, I want to go back and remind everybody what the media, what the establishment,

00:00:24.540 or as Darren would say, the globalist American empire, told us about January 6th all along.

00:00:30.400 I want to take a second to remind you to sign up for the Poso Daily Brief.

00:00:33.880 It is completely free.

00:00:35.220 It'll be one email that's sent to you every day.

00:00:37.100 You can stop the endless scrolling, trying to find out what's going on in your world.

00:00:40.180 We will have this delivered directly to you totally for free.

00:00:43.320 Go to humanevents.com slash Poso.

00:00:45.620 Sign up today.

00:00:46.940 It's called the Poso Daily Brief.

00:00:48.620 Read what I read for show prep.

00:00:50.220 You will not regret it.

00:00:51.860 Humanevents.com slash Poso.

00:00:53.520 Totally free.

00:00:54.040 The Poso Daily Brief.

00:01:04.720 At this hour, our democracy is under unprecedented assault.

00:01:11.360 Unlike anything we've seen in modern times.

00:01:15.200 An assault on the citadel of liberty.

00:01:19.720 The capital itself.

00:01:21.560 An assault on the people's representatives and the Capitol Hill police sworn to protect them.

00:01:30.240 And the public servants who work at the heart of our republic.

00:01:38.920 An assault on the rule of law like a few times we've ever seen it.

00:01:46.320 An assault on most sacred of American undertakings.

00:01:50.920 The doing of the people's business.

00:01:54.280 Let me be very clear.

00:01:57.660 The scenes of chaos at the Capitol do not reflect a true America.

00:02:04.960 Do not represent who we are.

00:02:08.020 What we're seeing are.

00:02:10.020 What we're seeing are a small number of extremists dedicated to lawlessness.

00:02:16.980 This is not dissent.

00:02:18.500 It's disorder.

00:02:19.500 It's disorder.

00:02:20.140 It's chaos.

00:02:22.140 It borders on sedition.

00:02:25.180 So I hide behind my door.

00:02:27.040 Like this.

00:02:29.040 Like I'm here.

00:02:30.040 Like I'm here.

00:02:31.040 And the bathroom door starts going like this.

00:02:33.420 Like the bathroom door is behind me.

00:02:35.720 Or rather in front of me.

00:02:36.920 And I'm like this.

00:02:37.620 And the door hinges right here.

00:02:39.000 And I just hear, where is she?

00:02:42.220 Where is she?

00:02:43.480 And this was the moment where I thought everything was over.

00:02:54.480 Here's where things stand.

00:02:57.380 That Trump mob that attacked the citadel of our democracy, our capital, they're being rounded

00:03:03.620 up and charged.

00:03:05.540 It's happening.

00:03:06.540 We're learning more about who they are.

00:03:09.500 They're not getting a pass, at least not yet.

00:03:12.280 As for who started it, feds say they're looking into Trump himself.

00:03:17.700 Now, as a matter of fact, this is obvious.

00:03:22.580 Trump whipped up these special people that he loves with lie after lie.

00:03:29.360 The January 6th insurrection shook our republic to the core.

00:03:34.140 For many in the Congress and across our country, the physical, psychological and emotional scars

00:03:39.660 are still raw.

00:03:41.640 But from the unspeakable horror sprang extraordinary heroism, law enforcement heroes confronted the insurrectionists to protect the

00:03:50.980 capital, the Congress and our Constitution.

00:03:55.200 They militarized our capital.

00:03:58.160 They occupied Washington, D.C.

00:04:01.760 Not like the Occupy Wall Street movement.

00:04:04.060 No, no, no.

00:04:05.200 Occupied with military force.

00:04:07.460 I remember I was there.

00:04:08.220 I couldn't park my car at work when I was working for another network at the time.

00:04:12.760 I had to show I.D. to get through a military checkpoint just to go to work every day.

00:04:18.540 This lasted for months.

00:04:21.140 When Joe Biden was inaugurated, there was a crowd of no one.

00:04:26.400 There were no cheering fans.

00:04:28.560 There was no audience.

00:04:30.320 Remember, we used to have all those arguments and debates and Sean Spicer used to get into it.

00:04:34.540 What was Trump's inauguration size?

00:04:36.960 What was Obama's inauguration size?

00:04:38.560 Well, you know what?

00:04:39.700 It's a lot better than Joe Biden's.

00:04:41.860 Joe Biden's didn't exist.

00:04:44.520 And all of this was done to usher in a regime.

00:04:49.100 Well, someone who's done more work on that than I think anybody and more work specifically on January 6th now joins us, the editor of Revolver News, Darren Beattie.

00:04:57.060 Darren, thank you so much for joining us.

00:04:58.960 Great to be with you, Jack.

00:05:01.180 Now, let me ask you, what is your take on and I'll say this, I'll put it this way.

00:05:06.580 The footage that we've seen thus far from Tucker Carlson and how does it relate to the yeoman's work that you have done at Revolver?

00:05:18.680 Well, I think Tucker was the perfect choice to be the custodian of this footage, at least for now.

00:05:26.360 I hope eventually it's made public and generally available.

00:05:31.200 But I think Tucker's done a great job in covering comprehensively the January 6th lie and choosing his footage examples to cover every dimension, sub-dimension of that lie.

00:05:46.140 So on Monday night, he showed footage reinforcing our understanding that this wasn't, generally speaking, a violent mob.

00:05:57.880 Overwhelmingly, most people who even went into the Capitol were respectful, obedient, even in many cases, reverential.

00:06:07.140 They were simply in awe of the Capitol.

00:06:11.100 They found it interesting.

00:06:12.500 They took pictures.

00:06:14.140 They left.

00:06:15.020 And that was the end of it.

00:06:16.440 There were a handful of people vandalizing and Tucker called them out, as I have.

00:06:21.320 But the overwhelming weight of the story is, look, most people, even inside the Capitol, were just moseying about taking pictures, not being destructive.

00:06:32.720 So that was one element of it.

00:06:34.340 The second element of it was he had footage of now deceased Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick.

00:06:43.940 The reason that this is important is it draws attention to the initial, maybe the original sin of the Fed's erection, the prelude to the larger lie of the Fed's erection.

00:06:55.440 And that was the circumstances surrounding this officer's death.

00:06:59.080 And people may not remember it now, but the very first piece that Revolver.News ever did on January 6th wasn't about Ray Epps, wasn't about Pipe Bomb, wasn't about any of those things.

00:07:11.760 It was about the death of Officer Sicknick.

00:07:15.020 The title of the piece was deliberately provocative, MAGA Blood Libel.

00:07:21.000 And indeed, that's what it was, because the whole narrative, everyone, every corridor in the regime media, you heard the refrain, it was bludgeoned to death with a fire extinguisher.

00:07:35.440 The frothing, rabid, MAGA mob, bludgeoned and murdered this Capitol Police officer.

00:07:44.660 Now, Revolver News did very extensive reporting on this, saying, look, there's no way he was bludgeoned to death.

00:07:50.920 That's simply false.

00:07:52.260 And it's a lie.

00:07:53.800 And it's a knowing, you know, it's a deliberate lie on the part of the regime media.

00:07:58.640 So, finally, they switched the story.

00:08:02.340 They said, OK, maybe he was a bludgeoned to death with a fire extinguisher, like we've been telling you from every media mouthpiece ad infinitum for the past month or so.

00:08:12.100 He actually died as a result of bear spray.

00:08:15.900 Some MAGA people sprayed him with bear spray and he died as a result of that.

00:08:20.140 Well, Revolver News jumped on that, specifically a New York Times story that provided all these images suggesting he was sprayed by these particular people.

00:08:30.400 Well, we did a very detailed comparative image analysis and concluded that he wasn't even sprayed by, you know, the people that.

00:08:38.740 If I if I remember correctly, you actually if I remember correctly, you actually did a spectral analysis of the images themselves to find where I remember this because I was I said, of course, Darren is going to go to this level because that's what we need.

00:08:53.700 Is you did a spectral analysis of the images themselves to determine the direction of the spray as as relates to where the the specific position of Sicknick and where he was standing was essentially perpendicular.

00:09:10.300 So aside from the direction that the spray was directed, thereby in saying that he could not have been hit by it.

00:09:17.460 Exactly. And if you'll permit a brief detour, this is this is interesting on a number.

00:09:21.880 This is interesting on a number of levels.

00:09:24.280 So there were two people that basically bore the brunt of the false media narrative because narrative was, oh, he died as a result of bear spray.

00:09:32.500 Who did the bear spray? Well, the guys out of West Virginia, right?

00:09:35.900 Exactly. Tanios and Cater.

00:09:38.700 These like a short order cook. 0.72

00:09:41.340 Yeah, they're, you know, they're, you know, hapless individuals.

00:09:45.820 They weren't up to any kind of mastermind issue.

00:09:48.240 But one really interesting thing here is that as part of the charges and they were hit with very serious charges, I think, with a maximum prison sentence of like 50 years, something like that.

00:09:59.860 And Ken, they couldn't said they didn't charge with attempted murder, which was interesting.

00:10:04.800 But the charge level is very high.

00:10:07.120 They're facing 50 years.

00:10:08.180 And as part of the alleged conspiracy, the government said, look, they had an exchange in which one of the individuals asked the other, is it time for the bear spray?

00:10:21.080 Can I get the bear spray?

00:10:22.520 And then the other individual said, no, no, not yet.

00:10:27.600 Simply the word yet was interpreted as meaning, oh, there was a plan to do something bad with the bear spray in the future.

00:10:35.920 And this constituted a conspiracy.

00:10:38.720 And they were hit with very serious conspiracy charges.

00:10:41.440 Now, fast forward, there's some, I'm going somewhere with this, and that is an underreported and underappreciated exchange between Ray Epps and another individual known to researchers as Maroon Proud Boy.

00:10:58.420 This is right by that initial breach site, just moments before the breach.

00:11:05.280 This is all on tape.

00:11:06.940 You can go to revolver.news, the Meet Ray Epps Part 2 series and watch this.

00:11:11.440 Fascinating exchange.

00:11:12.880 Maroon Proud Boy, who ended up going in the capital and being one of the very, you know, aggressive vandals, by the way.

00:11:19.520 He's a very interesting and suspicious character in his own right.

00:11:23.240 But this Maroon Proud Boy had bear spray in his hands, of all things, bear spray.

00:11:27.880 And Ray Epps tells him, when we go in, leave this here.

00:11:35.000 When we go in, leave this here.

00:11:37.920 We don't want to get shot.

00:11:41.440 So by the very same theory of conspiracy by which the government charged Tanios and Cater with very serious charges, long-term prison sentences, they could have easily, by that standard, charged Epps for saying, when we go in, leave this here.

00:12:00.860 Especially because the guy he was talking to, ended up going in and causing a lot of destruction.

00:12:07.020 And yet nothing.

00:12:08.800 And amazingly, it came out in the January 6th committee transcript of their interrogation of Epps, which was a total farce and disgrace.

00:12:18.680 Principally because Adam Kinzinger appointed himself as Ray Epps' lead counsel, effectively.

00:12:26.800 He was defending him more aggressively and creatively than Epps' own lawyer, who happened, incidentally, to be a nine-year veteran of the Phoenix FBI field office.

00:12:36.040 But amazingly, someone else, there are other committee members who are unnamed in this exchange who seem to be extremely puzzled by the whole Epps situation.

00:12:46.760 They're obedient enough dogs that they understand, okay, we understand we're supposed to be pro-Epps, but this is weird.

00:12:54.540 And, in fact, one of them even brought up that specific video that I mentioned of Epps saying, when we go in, because Epps told them, he told the committee, originally, I thought it would be legal to go into the Capitol.

00:13:09.280 What?

00:13:09.960 Mr. Epps, you were saying, I'm probably going to get arrested for this.

00:13:14.180 I'm probably going to go to jail for this.

00:13:16.540 Oh, that's just, that was just a poor choice of words.

00:13:19.480 Yeah, that was just a poor choice of words.

00:13:21.840 But when we got to the bike racks on the west side of the Capitol, I abandoned all notion of going in or having anyone else go in.

00:13:30.440 Well, the video that I just mentioned, that verbal exchange, completely contradicts that.

00:13:35.680 And amazingly, someone from the committee actually brought it up, and Epps was saying, oh, yeah, that was, I don't know about that.

00:13:43.600 I mean, it's ridiculous.

00:13:44.460 I've said in other contexts, it's like, Ray Epps is the shaggy of January 6th, because it's like, it wasn't me. 0.87

00:13:52.380 Oh, they caught you on camera here.

00:13:53.760 It wasn't me.

00:13:54.440 Oh, they caught you by the bike rack.

00:13:56.180 It wasn't me.

00:13:57.020 They caught you in the BLM on you.

00:13:59.920 It wasn't me.

00:14:01.400 It was like, that's...

00:14:02.460 I'm going to ask my producers to do a, we're going to have to do the auto-tune of you with...

00:14:06.300 Yeah, no, it's like, it's perfect.

00:14:07.800 It wasn't me.

00:14:09.020 Like, that's, that's the level of chutzpah and just, like, detachment of reality.

00:14:12.520 We caught you on Freedom Plaza.

00:14:14.560 In this, in this exchange.

00:14:17.820 But yes, this is, you know...

00:14:21.820 And by the way, this, this goes to Tucker, because Tucker caught him on the stairs.

00:14:26.500 We caught you on the stairs.

00:14:27.920 Exactly.

00:14:28.220 Literally.

00:14:29.540 This was, he had said that he had testified under oath, which, which is yet another lie.

00:14:36.280 And you can argue, was it the biggest lie?

00:14:38.080 But it's, it's the fact that he's never actually told the truth, right?

00:14:41.380 So he, he testifies, which you'd imagine that his lawyer would have at least asked to see the

00:14:45.980 tapes at some point or just going through, because this was outdoors.

00:14:48.980 It wasn't even indoors.

00:14:49.880 But you can see that at the point that he testified that he had already left,

00:14:54.200 he was still climbing the stairs to the Capitol.

00:14:57.340 Absolutely.

00:14:57.700 So many lies.

00:14:59.360 So where am I getting backtracked to the, to Tucker's segment on Monday?

00:15:04.140 He touches every single important dimension.

00:15:07.140 One dimension, they were mostly, you know, just kind of hanging out.

00:15:11.340 They weren't destructive.

00:15:12.520 Even the people in the Capitol, they were just taking pictures.

00:15:15.160 So he covered that with the footage.

00:15:16.800 He covered the Brian Sicknick thing, which I think a lot of people must have forgotten about

00:15:20.880 this.

00:15:21.180 But this was the original sin, the original big lie, the original blood lie.

00:15:27.320 Darren, why?

00:15:27.980 And thirdly, he covered the kind of most explosive and provocative dimension of it,

00:15:38.020 for which Revolver News is reporting is best known.

00:15:41.480 And that is the Fed element by exposing Ray Epps and yet another provable lie that he gave

00:15:48.660 to the committee.

00:15:49.360 And the committee didn't care at all.

00:15:51.360 Just further reinforcing our understanding that Ray Epps enjoys an absolutely insane degree

00:16:00.140 of protection on the government from the self-appointed J6 witch hunters to a degree that simply defies 1.00

00:16:07.700 any innocent explanation. 0.66

00:16:09.280 It's very clear Ray Epps is the smoking gun of the Fed's erection.

00:16:13.140 And Tucker's segment confirms that if we, if there was any remaining doubt.

00:16:19.340 Darren, why was this blood libel Brian Sicknick?

00:16:26.120 And by the way, you're exactly right that I can go to just about anybody out on the street

00:16:31.740 here in DC.

00:16:32.900 You could probably go in any major city and say, Hey, what happened on January 6th?

00:16:36.680 They said, Oh, they, they killed a bunch of cops.

00:16:38.600 They would say Trump supporters killed a bunch of cops, right? 0.89

00:16:41.380 They attacked the Capitol, killed a bunch of cops.

00:16:44.040 And, and it's just not true.

00:16:45.360 And it's never been true.

00:16:46.240 But why, why did it need to be true?

00:16:49.580 Why was this pushed so hard from the highest levels?

00:16:53.640 Why has it always been stated?

00:16:55.040 Why was it that the April 2nd, I mean, we already know the reason, but you know, the April 2nd

00:16:59.460 actual murder of a Capitol police officer named Billy Evans, just a few, just three months

00:17:05.560 after January 6th and it's never even spoken up when he was killed by a nation of Islam member 0.94

00:17:13.200 who drove his car into the Capitol.

00:17:15.420 This is after the military and the national guard had left and the barricades had come

00:17:18.720 down.

00:17:19.320 Nobody talks about Billy Evans, the only Capitol police officer murdered on the job in 20 years.

00:17:26.120 Why was the Brian Sicknick story so important for the regime, Darren?

00:17:32.460 One word deadly.

00:17:35.140 The death of Brian Sicknick and the false narrative behind it is what enabled the press to put deadly

00:17:43.240 insurrection on all of their headlines and therefore reinforce what they wanted out of this lie to

00:17:48.720 begin with, to frame all Trump supporters as potential terrorists, as domestic terrorists. 1.00

00:17:56.800 You need a death. 1.00

00:17:58.400 You need a body. 0.69

00:17:59.260 And, you know, for obvious reasons, they weren't going to go with Ashley Babbitt's body here

00:18:03.700 because that's, you know, that's what really makes it deadly, but that doesn't really fit

00:18:07.700 their narrative.

00:18:08.180 So they needed some pretext to call it deadly.

00:18:11.160 And the death of Brian Sicknick saying, oh, they bludgeoned him to death.

00:18:16.200 They bear sprayed him.

00:18:17.340 He died from that.

00:18:18.420 That enabled them to say the dead, the murderous mob, the deadly insurrection.

00:18:25.380 You know, it reminds me, it reminds me a little bit of something that happened in a place called

00:18:31.280 Ukraine in 2014 and the Maidan protest, which then became the Maidan massacre, the deadly

00:18:40.980 Maidan massacre, which is, of course, if you listen to any corporate media, which was conducted

00:18:47.020 by the president of Ukraine himself, he ordered his his secret police to open fire on the crowd.

00:18:54.800 He was behind the deadly Maidan massacre, and that was used to throw him out of office.

00:19:01.060 But, Darren, that was a color revolution.

00:19:04.060 We'd never see anything like that here in the United States within our own shores, would

00:19:07.080 we?

00:19:08.380 Right.

00:19:08.820 Well, that's a that's a very interesting point, especially because one of the principal U.S.

00:19:14.420 figures associated with that Maidan is none other than Victoria Newland, who is presently

00:19:21.900 a very senior official in Biden's State Department and who is basically named in the controversial

00:19:28.760 and unsubstantiated, but potentially at least partially true account given by Seymour

00:19:34.300 Hirsch of the US plan to destroy Nord Stream.

00:19:38.100 She's been she's been in this game for a long time and she's one of the principal players

00:19:43.060 now in foreign policy, shaping our disastrous involvement and escalation and prolongation of

00:19:52.700 this this conflict in Ukraine.

00:19:56.500 But way back in the Obama administration, you know, even back before that, she was one of

00:20:03.260 these principal architects of color revolution.

00:20:05.840 She was there in Ukraine, you know, ginning up these these protests.

00:20:12.780 And, you know, it's funny that this comes up because, you know, before January six.

00:20:18.980 Revolver News is probably best known for we did a pretty impactful series covering the

00:20:24.220 color revolution.

00:20:25.060 And the principal thesis there was not just that the method, the color revolution methodologies

00:20:32.900 that we would typically deploy in, you know, Eastern Europe and not just Eastern Europe.

00:20:38.880 You see it a lot of places these days, but they're principally associated with Eastern Europe.

00:20:44.520 For instance, the Orange Revolution is basically where the whole idea of the color revolution 0.72

00:20:50.160 comes from, but that we were that U.S. officials, in particular, a specific sub-faction of the

00:20:59.200 national security state, this Atlantis faction, was deploying the same methodology domestically

00:21:05.820 in order to cripple Trump in the lead up to the presidential election.

00:21:10.320 And that wasn't just the same methodology.

00:21:13.160 It was the same people.

00:21:14.840 And that was the principal thesis of the color revolution theory, the series that Revolver.News

00:21:19.760 did.

00:21:20.760 And we covered people like George Kent, who was a major figure who's associated with Trump's

00:21:26.120 impeachment.

00:21:27.120 He was also a senior State Department official who was a color revolution architect.

00:21:32.560 The most famous one that we drew attention to is this individual called Norm Eisen, who literally

00:21:38.260 wrote a book called The Playbook, which is like an instruction manual for how to conduct color

00:21:44.960 revolutions.

00:21:45.960 And you could see him following each prescription to the T, not only in his role in foreign affairs

00:21:54.620 context, but principally in a domestic context in order to go after Trump.

00:21:58.820 He is the most decorated legal hatchet man against Trump.

00:22:04.360 A lawfare architect against Trump.

00:22:08.360 And it turns out his fingerprints, incidentally, are all over January 6.

00:22:12.720 We did a big piece on that, that the January 6 impeachment traces all the way back to lawfare

00:22:21.360 efforts that Norm Eisen was doing with his lawfare companion, Joseph Sellers.

00:22:27.360 The two collaborated very early on.

00:22:30.360 You'll remember they were trying to get Trump for violations of the emoluments clause.

00:22:34.360 This goes back very early.

00:22:36.360 And that collaborative effort also germinated what emerged into Benny Thompson's lawsuit against

00:22:45.360 Trump for January 6, in which he laid out the same theory of the case, that Trump was responsible

00:22:51.360 for criminal incitement and so forth.

00:22:54.360 Why somebody who had a personal lawsuit like that, with a theory of the case already laid

00:23:00.360 out, would be appointed to head an ostensibly neutral fact-finding body for January 6?

00:23:08.360 Well, if we weren't a banana republic at this point, that would have been called a conflict

00:23:13.360 of interest.

00:23:14.360 But that was really Benny Thompson's selling point, I think, from the standpoint of the regime.

00:23:20.360 This goes back a long way.

00:23:22.360 I would also...

00:23:23.360 Yeah.

00:23:24.360 Oh, just, no, just to add to your incredible reporting, because you're, I think you're

00:23:27.360 the person that made Norm Eisen famous.

00:23:29.360 Yeah.

00:23:30.360 But folks remember that Time Magazine article.

00:23:35.360 I pulled it up here.

00:23:37.360 The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign that Saved 2020 by Molly Ball, February 4, 2021.

00:23:44.360 Because, you know, the killer always comes back to the scene of the crime.

00:23:48.360 The killer always has to make sure that, you know, writes the letter to the police to say,

00:23:53.360 I just want to let you know that you couldn't get me.

00:23:56.360 Well, Darren, who's one of the very first people mentioned in that article, the secret

00:24:02.360 history of the shadow campaign to fortify the election of 2020 is Norm Eisen himself, a prominent,

00:24:11.360 this is how they describe him, a prominent lawyer and former Obama official who recruited

00:24:17.360 both Republicans and Democrats to the board of what he called the Voter Protection Program.

00:24:25.360 Right.

00:24:26.360 Voter Protection Program.

00:24:29.360 So intimately involved with the details of what we saw here in 20.

00:24:34.360 Remember, this was the same article that stated that they weren't sure if they needed riots

00:24:42.360 and mobs and attacks and violence in the wake of the 2020 election.

00:24:47.360 But if so needed, they could be called upon that literally stated right there in Time magazine saying

00:24:54.360 basically, and I'm just going to cut to the chase that this is a color revolution.

00:24:58.360 We are the architects of it.

00:25:00.360 We have created it.

00:25:01.360 Norm Eisen is taking credit for it.

00:25:03.360 He obviously wants credit for it.

00:25:05.360 Right.

00:25:06.360 Which is a very human, a human endeavor to want credit.

00:25:10.360 You want, you know, want recognition for what you've done.

00:25:13.360 And they're basically saying that this is why all of these things happens because it was

00:25:18.360 happened.

00:25:19.360 It happened at our design.

00:25:20.360 We saw it all within a 12 month span.

00:25:22.360 George Floyd, Wuhan, the CCP, the Hunter Biden laptop and the squelching of that.

00:25:29.360 Um, and then it of course culminates in January six.

00:25:33.360 And then one month after January six, this article comes out in time magazine and, and

00:25:38.360 Darren, my argument, and I made this earlier in the week is that the reason that January

00:25:43.360 six as the culmination of everything that happened in 2020 must stand up and why this

00:25:51.360 narrative must be protected.

00:25:52.360 And you notice, by the way, it's protected by people on both sides of the aisle.

00:25:56.360 The unit parties absolutely circled the wagons on this thing, right?

00:26:00.360 Because it is the justification, right?

00:26:02.360 So it creates the mental and emotional resonance for a justification for all the insanity of

00:26:09.360 2020, why all the, the norms, the rules for elections, why you had to stay in your home,

00:26:16.360 but these people could go out and riot.

00:26:18.360 Why militants could take over a 12 square block radius of downtown Seattle, why the Portland

00:26:23.360 could be attacked for 59 nights straight and not a single person arrested or, or anything

00:26:27.360 meaningful done.

00:26:28.360 Why was all of this done because of January six.

00:26:31.360 And even though we know that chronologically it makes no sense, but they say, we were trying

00:26:37.360 to protect you from something like this happening.

00:26:40.360 And now that it has happened, this to your point, a deadly insurrection was what we were

00:26:46.360 trying to protect you from all along.

00:26:50.360 Yes.

00:26:51.360 I think there could absolutely be an element like that of, of retro, of retrofitting.

00:26:57.360 Um, and yes, uh, it's, it's, there's the response to January six has certainly been

00:27:06.360 far more profound than whatever trivial response there was to, you know, the Antifa, the BLM,

00:27:13.360 and, and so forth.

00:27:14.360 And, you know, as we've, we've learned now we were critical at the time, but now it's

00:27:18.360 basically public record that, you know, Barr didn't want to do anything about any of that,

00:27:24.360 which is kind of a sad state of affairs.

00:27:27.360 You know, this was all going on, you know, under Trump's presidency and his own attorney

00:27:34.360 general refused to do anything about it when people were burning down streets, rioting and

00:27:40.360 so forth.

00:27:41.360 And, you know, there was even an attack on the white house, uh, that, you know, people

00:27:47.360 don't really talk about anymore.

00:27:48.360 There was even an attack on the white house and really no, no, no, no, no, no, no.

00:27:53.360 Because, because general Milley did, did talk about it because he apologized for appearing

00:27:58.360 in a, in a, a walking line with the president, uh, after they cleared out the rioters who were setting

00:28:07.360 fire to secret service encampments, the secret service facilities that extend beyond the grounds

00:28:13.360 of directly the white house.

00:28:14.360 So that's, there's Lafayette square, Lafayette park square.

00:28:16.360 That's right there.

00:28:17.360 There's St. John's historic church, which was also set on fire.

00:28:19.360 So yes, it was cleared out.

00:28:21.360 General Milley and president Trump walk out in this very famous moment.

00:28:25.360 He holds the Bible up in front of St.

00:28:27.360 John's basically to say, you know, we are going, we are not going to allow this to happen.

00:28:30.360 Keep in mind, I mean, we are told that, that that wasn't a big deal and it was just a protest.

00:28:37.360 And even though the secret service did by the way, rush the president into the bunker because

00:28:42.360 they weren't sure what was going to go on.

00:28:43.360 They weren't sure if people were going to get inside.

00:28:45.360 So they decided to take precaution.

00:28:47.360 Now compare that to the reaction of January six, where, as we've now seen the videos of people simply stumbling around in some cases, shuffling about in statuary hall and other areas as, as Norm Macdonald famously tweeted at the time, uh, that they were staying within the velvet ropes.

00:29:08.360 These violent terrorists, um, the great Norm Macdonald, late great Norm Macdonald, that we were told that everybody was about to be killed.

00:29:18.360 And by the way, that, that is what justifies the murder of Ashley Babbitt because these, these heinous individuals were about to go in and murder everyone in the Capitol.

00:29:29.360 And it simply wasn't true.

00:29:31.360 Right.

00:29:32.360 No, that's a great point about, uh, Ashley Babbitt.

00:29:35.360 Um, because again, they wanted to use the term deadly, but it's kind of hard to do that.

00:29:40.360 If, you know, the most conspicuous death is the death of Ashley Babbitt, who was unarmed and pretty much shot in cold blood.

00:29:49.360 You could say, uh, they needed something like the death of Sicknick to not just balance that out, but to totally obscure it.

00:29:59.360 And so, yes, um, this was absolutely, as I say, it was the original sin, the original big lie of January 6th.

00:30:06.360 It was the circumstances surrounding the tragic death of Brian Sicknick, but the death, which has now been revealed because, uh, by natural events, natural causes is the, uh, now the story that even the New York times concedes is the accurate description of.

00:30:28.360 How he died.

00:30:31.360 Well, Darren, so, so let me ask you this question because.

00:30:34.360 It feels like the history books are already kind of moving on from this.

00:30:37.360 And I had Heather McDonald on here, uh, a couple of weeks ago on a Sunday special. 0.99

00:30:41.360 And I talked about the fact that I remember not learning about the LA riots or learning anything meaningful about the LA riots until I was almost an adult.

00:30:51.360 Um, even though I was, I was a kid when they happened that these things, and, and you could certainly put Waco Ruby Ridge, other events that happened throughout the 1990s in the same bucket, that there is a very strong.

00:31:04.360 Very strong mainstream narrative on all of these events that will stand and that will sort of become the official version of history.

00:31:13.360 And that if that is not challenged in the moment, then that becomes official history.

00:31:18.360 I mean, Nancy Pelosi at one point was talking about putting, uh, monuments at the United States Capitol to, uh, Brian Sicknick and others, uh, for standing up and defending the Capitol, losing their life to do so.

00:31:30.360 Even though as, as, as you've discussed here, it's, it's, it's simply not an accurate depiction of what happened, right?

00:31:36.360 I mean, what do we do as a movement to prevent these things from happening?

00:31:43.360 That's such an important point.

00:31:45.360 Um, because what the regime counts on is for these things to the false narratives to crystallize to the point that they become sacred before they can be challenged.

00:31:58.360 And that's why it's so critical to challenge these things before the crystal of the full crystallization takes place.

00:32:06.360 And I think that was, you know, the Sicknick narrative was successfully challenged before it became too sacred to be challenged.

00:32:15.360 And that really opened the door to subsequent challenges, including the big feds erection challenge to the official narrative.

00:32:23.360 So I think one important take home point to this is just how critical it is to get in these things, to challenge these narratives before they coalesce, before they become too sacred, because then it becomes very difficult.

00:32:37.360 You might have to wait a long time before you can even revisit it.

00:32:41.360 And, you know, it's interesting in that context, you know, CNN of all places ran this extensive and I have to say, um, excellent high quality investigative long form investigative piece on the death of, of Terrence Yickey, um, uh, associated with the Oklahoma City bombing.

00:33:02.360 Who was Terrence Yickey, Darren is, is, is a, uh, police officer in, um, in Oklahoma City who died under very mysterious circumstances.

00:33:13.360 Um, before, you know, I started talking about him on, on Twitter, like a couple of years ago and Wikipedia revised their whole description of him, but people can go and find, you know, read the CNN report.

00:33:26.360 Um, listen to go to YouTube and there's a, something called Requiem for the suicide.

00:33:33.360 And you can watch the, the episode on Terrence Yickey, but it looks like he was murdered.

00:33:41.360 It looks like he was murdered and it was covered up as a suicide.

00:33:45.360 That's what it's, it, that's what it looks like.

00:33:47.360 And not just murdered, but I mean, uh, brutalized, tortured.

00:33:51.360 Yeah.

00:33:52.360 To the point where it, it seemed like people were trying to get information out of him before he was killed.

00:33:58.360 Uh, yes.

00:34:01.360 And, and there's, there's other mysterious deaths.

00:34:05.360 There's the death of Kenneth Trenadue.

00:34:07.360 That's another thing.

00:34:08.360 That's another thing.

00:34:09.360 He was definitely tortured in, in a, in a jail cell.

00:34:12.360 And then, you know, the biggest researcher on Oklahoma city, uh, was his brother who is a real hero and pioneer in uncovering the truth about Oklahoma city.

00:34:23.360 But the point is when Oklahoma city happened, it was a shocking event and it's, you know, it's a deeply tragic event.

00:34:31.360 You know, there were some, you know, it's tragedy.

00:34:34.360 What happened to Ashley Babbitt, Oklahoma city was on a different level.

00:34:38.360 You know, children died.

00:34:39.360 It's, it was the, it was the most significant domestic terror attack in America's history when it happened.

00:34:46.360 And there were some challenges in the beginning, but it was all in a local level.

00:34:51.360 I would compare it to maybe like the Las Vegas massacre where you had some, you know, local people asking some questions for a while.

00:34:59.360 And that was quickly overwhelmed by federal officials.

00:35:02.360 And then you don't really hear anything more from it.

00:35:05.360 It was more of that situation in Oklahoma city, America Garland of all people was the big coverup guy for Oklahoma.

00:35:11.360 I was just going to ask you that who was the principal associate attorney general that was sent by Janet Reno in 1995 down to Oklahoma city, which by the way, the, in, in, in the X files movie,

00:35:24.360 movie, it actually opens as if Scully and Mulder are the, are working on the, the first movie are working on the Oklahoma city bombing.

00:35:32.360 But the person who was the principal associate attorney general, deputy attorney general that was sent by Janet Reno to Oklahoma city to run the, the entire investigation was none other than Merrick Garland.

00:35:44.360 No, it really is amazing.

00:35:46.360 No, it really is amazing.

00:35:47.360 Current attorney general Merrick Garland and another key figure in, in, in this, what looks to be a coverup.

00:35:53.360 Eric Holder.

00:35:55.360 You know that these, these people, there's not their first rodeo.

00:35:59.360 There's a reason that people are chosen to become attorney general.

00:36:04.360 And it would, in, in this context, it would be interesting to revisit the case of Bill Barr.

00:36:09.360 Why was he allowed to be attorney general?

00:36:11.360 Not saying he was associated with Oklahoma city, but maybe some other things.

00:36:16.360 It, it, it's clearly the kind of position where you have to put in your work.

00:36:20.360 You have to have been vetted thoroughly by, wait, wait, you, you know, his connection though, right?

00:36:25.360 For Bill Barr, right?

00:36:26.360 What's that?

00:36:27.360 You know about Bill Barr's connection to the past, right?

00:36:30.360 Sure.

00:36:31.360 Well, I mean, the, there's the Epstein stuff and a bunch of other stuff, but I'm, I don't.

00:36:36.360 Bill Barr, what, uh, Bill Barr defended the FBI snipers at Ruby Ridge.

00:36:43.360 Interesting.

00:36:44.360 That I didn't know.

00:36:45.360 Interesting.

00:36:46.360 Bill Barr defended them.

00:36:48.360 Uh, I have to, I'd have to look up, I can, I can pull something here.

00:36:52.360 He organized former attorneys general and others to quote, support an FBI sniper in defending

00:36:59.360 against criminal charges.

00:37:00.360 It is back in the 1990s.

00:37:02.360 Um, of course the killing of, of Randy Weaver's wife and her baby in 1992, Bill Barr assisted

00:37:09.360 in framing legal arguments and advanced in the district court and subsequent appeal to

00:37:14.360 the ninth circuit court, a quote charitable work, charitable work that was done by Bill

00:37:21.360 Barr out of the goodness of his heart for the sniper that took out Randy Weaver's family

00:37:25.360 at Ruby Ridge.

00:37:26.360 Uh, it's remarkable, but not surprising.

00:37:29.360 This is the kind of thing you need on your resume to become attorney general.

00:37:34.360 You need to put in this work, need to demonstrate fealty to the regime.

00:37:38.360 In the case of Garland and Holder that has to do with their conduct, um, with respect to

00:37:46.360 Oklahoma city.

00:37:47.360 But this gets to the point about sacred before challenge before I think now the circumstances

00:37:53.360 are actually more open than ever to actually revisit the Oklahoma city case with respect

00:38:01.360 to what really happened.

00:38:02.360 It's a very dark thing.

00:38:03.360 It's still, I think very uncomfortable for a lot of Americans to digest, um, and very controversial

00:38:11.360 for that reason.

00:38:12.360 But I think there's more receptivity to truth on that now than there would have been before

00:38:19.360 the January six issue.

00:38:21.360 I think the coverage on January six that we've done at revolver and you've, and that you've

00:38:26.360 done and, you know, Tucker and a handful of others who have really been stalwarts on

00:38:31.360 January six has not only done the service of presenting the truth about January six, but

00:38:36.360 I think it's presented a broader opportunity, uh, that otherwise would not exist for the American

00:38:43.360 people to revisit some other events with the current understanding of what the government

00:38:49.360 is actually capable of.

00:38:50.360 And you're seeing this, by the way, you're seeing a reinvigoration of people going back

00:38:53.360 and questioning the official narrative on many of the great American scandals of the, of the

00:38:59.360 modern era, the past decade, not only Oklahoma city, Ruby Ridge, Waco, but even prior events like

00:39:05.360 Watergate with Richard Nixon, like the assassination of JFK though, though I admittedly the assassination

00:39:11.360 of JFK has always been questioned by the American people.

00:39:14.360 Uh, the, the fact though, that so many of, because it was so egregious that so many of

00:39:20.360 these other events though, where the, the narrative has solidified, but it's also interesting because

00:39:24.360 in, in each of those events, uh, Waco, Ruby Ridge, and now Oklahoma city, you notice that

00:39:31.360 it, it, the narrative solidified if you were around in the nineties, but for the new generation

00:39:37.360 that wasn't, wasn't around, it wasn't, or, or, or folks like that are my generation, our

00:39:42.360 generation that weren't necessarily paying attention to the news back then.

00:39:46.360 Uh, this same, we, we don't quite have the conditioning on, on this that used to exist

00:39:54.360 in an era where there were only three media networks.

00:39:57.360 There were, you know, two national papers and then, you know, one paper of record for every

00:40:01.360 major city.

00:40:02.360 And that's the way the media worked.

00:40:03.360 And if you control that, if you work with those people, then you would be able to set

00:40:07.360 the mono narrative as the Obama administration used to call it, the mono narrative.

00:40:11.360 Well, the modern narrative doesn't exist anymore because in individual, uh, media, independent

00:40:18.360 media like this operates revolver news post millennial human events.com, et cetera, et cetera.

00:40:23.360 We have so many more outlets now that we have a democratization.

00:40:26.360 This is why Twitter and Elon Musk are so important.

00:40:28.360 And Elon Musk to his credit has again, going back to what you wrote in a, in a revolver about

00:40:35.360 he has taken Twitter and said, I want Twitter to be the source of truth.

00:40:41.360 The greatest source of truth.

00:40:43.360 He didn't say that I want it to be the most profitable.

00:40:45.360 I'm sure he does.

00:40:46.360 Uh, he didn't say that I want Twitter to be the most, uh, the most used.

00:40:51.360 I don't want it.

00:40:52.360 He didn't say I want the most kids, the most celebrities.

00:40:53.360 No, he said, I want it to be the source of truth.

00:40:56.360 Why is that so important, Darren?

00:40:58.360 Well, I mean, it's, it's important because of how powerful the Twitter platform is, how

00:41:07.360 the network affects on Twitter.

00:41:09.360 There's so many people and, uh, you know, it's a, it's a noble and worthy goal to say,

00:41:16.360 okay, uh, I want it to be the source of truth.

00:41:19.360 I, you know, it's who's going to be the arbiter of that.

00:41:24.360 I hope that that doesn't reflect, uh, any tendencies towards sort of, uh, making editorial

00:41:31.360 decisions on.

00:41:32.360 No, no, no, no, no, no.

00:41:33.360 I, I think let me make sure I'm not misquoting him because he was saying it in the context

00:41:38.360 of, I want Twitter to be a free place where people can debate these things and that official

00:41:44.860 narratives can be challenged.

00:41:46.360 Right.

00:41:47.360 And I think on that score, that's a very noble goal.

00:41:50.360 And from a personal perspective, it does seem that Elon Musk has, um, more than entertained

00:41:59.360 serious challenges to official narratives on a wide range of things.

00:42:04.360 Um, just the other day, he was retweeting, um, you know, January six, uh, material and January

00:42:11.360 six material from our perspective in light of, uh, Tucker's segment.

00:42:16.360 Um, he's been, um, perhaps unexpectedly, uh, courageous and based in his defense of, uh,

00:42:27.360 Dilbert and, and Scott Adams.

00:42:30.360 He's, he's been unexpectedly courageous on the COVID question and on a wide range of questions.

00:42:37.360 And of course the simple act of, you know, this hostile takeover of Twitter is a monumental

00:42:43.360 event and he deserves tremendous credit for it.

00:42:46.360 And so one thing that I've actually been, uh, been testing is, um, the use, and I'm sure

00:42:51.360 you've seen them on that.

00:42:52.360 We've been on the program here, creating deep fakes of, uh, of elected officials.

00:42:58.360 Um, one of which the first one that just went completely viral millions of views was of

00:43:05.360 president Biden announcing a national draft, the invocation of the selective service act

00:43:10.360 to deal with military shortfalls.

00:43:12.360 And of course the, the deteriorating conditions in, in the Ukraine war.

00:43:16.360 So it's, it's present.

00:43:18.360 What we're doing is we're not making them outlandish and playing a video game.

00:43:21.360 We're, we're going in and saying, what would happen six months from now?

00:43:26.360 What would happen eight months from now?

00:43:28.360 And then of course we also made one of AOC attacking Jack Posobiec for creating a deep

00:43:33.360 fake of president Biden, and then also attacking Elon Musk for refusing to delete it from the

00:43:38.360 platform.

00:43:40.360 No, that's, that's hilarious and very interesting.

00:43:42.360 I, I saw the, the Joe Biden one on the draft and, um, no, it's, it was, he allowed it to fly.

00:43:49.360 He allowed it to fly.

00:43:50.360 He allowed it to fly.

00:43:51.360 There was a, there was a community note tag, but whatever.

00:43:54.360 Right.

00:43:55.360 But the script was actually very good.

00:43:57.360 The script was realistic.

00:43:58.360 It read like what he might actually say in that context.

00:44:02.360 Um, thank you.

00:44:04.360 It was, it was a, uh, it was a fascinating exercise for sure.

00:44:09.360 And, and I think that the test on our side was okay.

00:44:14.360 You know, is Elon Musk going to take us down?

00:44:16.360 Is he going to allow this to fly?

00:44:17.360 Now, of course we didn't make one of Elon, but the question is, and what was interesting

00:44:21.360 is to us as well is that we actually had, and of course all the hit pieces and fact

00:44:24.360 checks that were written up only served to further the video more.

00:44:28.360 Um, but one, uh, deep fake expert actually came out and said, look, I, I think this is

00:44:35.360 a legitimate use of this technology.

00:44:37.360 What you're doing is political commentary, social commentary.

00:44:40.360 We're talking about a potential world war three situation situation.

00:44:44.360 So sure.

00:44:45.360 Why wouldn't we use the same technology?

00:44:47.360 By the way, it certainly falls under the legal auspices of parody or satire.

00:44:51.360 The same way that when SNL gets a president gets an actor who looks like the president

00:44:55.360 and puts him on stage and has him act and sound like the president.

00:45:00.360 Right.

00:45:01.360 Nobody takes that down from social media.

00:45:03.360 The problem is, is now it's our side doing it.

00:45:06.360 Right.

00:45:07.360 I mean, there's the, everybody, the thing is, is people talk about the deep fake technology,

00:45:12.360 but, um, the regime has had this technology for a long time and they have much more sophisticated

00:45:18.360 versions.

00:45:19.360 So the real concern is that now, now other people get to use it and can use it, uh, in

00:45:28.360 contexts that are not necessarily approved by the regime.

00:45:31.360 So I think it's a fascinating frontier.

00:45:34.360 That's my favorite response, by the way, you'll, you'll like this is, is, as of course,

00:45:38.360 a lot of conservatives were even saying to me, this is so inappropriate.

00:45:41.360 How can you do this?

00:45:42.360 This is terrible.

00:45:43.360 What shouldn't use this technology this way.

00:45:46.360 And, and, and then they said, what do you think?

00:45:49.360 How would you like it?

00:45:50.360 If the media started doing this to you guys?

00:45:52.360 Oh, really?

00:45:53.360 How would I, how would I like it? 0.91

00:45:54.360 If the media started lying about me and my friends and Donald Trump and it's just ridiculous. 0.78

00:45:59.360 Right. 0.67

00:46:00.360 Right.

00:46:01.360 No, I think that's, that's fascinating.

00:46:04.360 You should do, you should do more.

00:46:06.360 Oh, we're going to do more and I'll do one of you next.

00:46:08.360 Probably.

00:46:09.360 We've got your audio here from the praising, praising the FBI and CIA.

00:46:15.360 I was wrong.

00:46:16.360 I was wrong.

00:46:17.360 I was wrong about Ray Epps and he's that he and I actually went out for drinks last

00:46:21.360 night and it turns out he's a good guy.

00:46:23.360 And we slept on some, my pillows, not together, separate rooms, but we had a great, it took

00:46:29.360 me, took me to a cabin up in the woods and now I've seen the light, but that's, I think

00:46:34.360 that's what they'd rather do to, to all of us.

00:46:37.360 All of us now.

00:46:38.360 Um, the Nina Yankovich is the world talking about suing us. 1.00

00:46:42.360 Uh, everyone out there essentially saying, how can we shut these people down?

00:46:46.360 Because all we're doing all we're, we're, we're, we're looking at the same set of facts.

00:46:50.360 We're looking at it as everybody else.

00:46:51.360 And I said, I've seen you at revolver do this as well.

00:46:54.360 All you're doing is you're adding one little piece of critical thinking to the same videos

00:47:00.360 and images that everyone else sees.

00:47:03.360 Right.

00:47:04.360 Right.

00:47:05.360 Now it's all about the context and that's, that's why the media creates reality for better

00:47:12.360 or worse because they provide the context and the framework in which and through which

00:47:17.360 to perceive reality.

00:47:18.360 And that's.

00:47:19.360 And I should say as, as we wind down, congratulations to you because I saw a Rasmussen poll last week.

00:47:25.360 And I mentioned this on, on stage and I gave you credit as well.

00:47:29.360 They're at CPAC 61% now 61% of American voters now believe that January six likely had federal

00:47:40.360 involvement 61%.

00:47:43.360 Now that's, oh, that's got to include Democrats as well.

00:47:47.360 And it was, it was over 50% of Democrats.

00:47:50.360 That's remarkable.

00:47:51.360 Yeah.

00:47:52.360 I saw, uh, Thomas Massey mentioned this.

00:47:55.360 I was wondering where, where did that come from?

00:47:57.360 But now it's, I'm glad to know it's, there's a, there's a whole poll on it.

00:48:01.360 There's I'll, I'll, I'll make sure to send it to you.

00:48:03.360 Darren, we're just about out of time.

00:48:04.360 I want to say thank you again for joining us on the Sunday special.

00:48:07.360 Where can people go to follow you?

00:48:08.360 Are you able to give us any insights into what you're up to next?

00:48:11.360 Revolver dot news.

00:48:13.360 We have some important pieces coming up on, uh, an El Salvador and on a very significant

00:48:22.360 first amendment case that I think we've talked about, uh, Biden's justice department, trying

00:48:27.360 to put a guy in jail for, for me and put them in jail for 10 years.

00:48:31.360 And what this means is the Biden regime.

00:48:34.360 Yeah.

00:48:35.360 Trying to codify the disinformation scam into the criminal code.

00:48:39.360 So it's a very dangerous trend.

00:48:41.360 We have a followup on that coming soon and maybe a little January six stuff as well.

00:48:46.360 So people should stay tuned, go to revolver dot news.

00:48:50.360 I'm at Twitter at Darren J.

00:48:52.360 Beattie and we're at getter at revolver news.

00:48:55.360 All right.

00:48:56.360 Support revolver dot news, support Darren Beattie.

00:48:58.360 Ladies and gentlemen, as always, you have my permission to lay ashore.

00:49:00.360 Michael Berman, run it s your own the whatever that rules.

00:49:01.360 Have a great気 Steve.

00:49:02.360 You host slowly, from location lane lane lane lane lane lane lane lane lane lane lane lane lane

00:49:03.860 You

Human Events Daily with Jack Posobiec - March 12, 2023

SUNDAY SPECIAL： JANUARY 6TH RETROSPECTIVE WITH DARREN BEATTIE

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript