00:00:54.380Netflix said it is declining to raise its offer for the purchase of Warner Bros. Studios and HBO
00:01:01.540following the Warner Bros. Discovery board's determination that Paramount has submitted
00:01:06.380a superior offer, according to Warner Bros. Discovery's board.
00:01:10.920A third victim has died following that deadly shooting at a youth hockey game in Rhode Island.
00:01:16.120Gerald Dorgan was in critical condition for more than a week. His daughter Rhonda,
00:01:20.280who was the ex-wife of the shooter, and their son, Aiden, were also killed in the shooting.
00:01:24.880The shooter was identified as Robert Dorgan, who also went by the names Roberta Esposito and Roberta Dorgano.
00:01:31.520This is a U.S. Embassy Jerusalem Post.
00:01:34.480It reads, on February 27, 2026, the Department of State authorized the departure of non-emergency U.S. government personnel
00:01:41.380and family members of U.S. government personnel from Mission Israel due to safety risks.
00:01:47.600The U.S. Embassy in Israel says the State Department has authorized non-essential personnel and their families to leave the country because of, quote, safety risks.
00:01:57.200And with the looming possibility of a strike on Iran, the staff that want to leave are encouraged to go while commercial flights are still available.
00:02:04.620Republicans have now set a new precedent, which is to bring in presidents and former presidents to testify.
00:02:11.260So we're once again going to make that call that we did yesterday.
00:02:14.640We are now asking and demanding that President Trump officially come in and testify in front of the Oversight Committee.
00:02:24.060To hear from the 42nd president to publicly address his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein,
00:02:29.080all as Hillary Clinton denies any knowledge of Epstein's crimes after her meeting with Republicans.
00:02:34.180I answered every one of their questions as fully as I could based on what I knew.
00:02:43.440And what I knew is what I said in my statement this morning.
00:02:48.120I never met Jeffrey Epstein, never had any connection or communication with him.
00:02:55.800I knew Ghislaine Maxwell casually as an acquaintance.
00:03:00.880Today, former President Bill Clinton takes the hot seat as House lawmakers probe for answers about the nature of his ties to late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
00:03:12.580Ladies and gentlemen, welcome aboard today's edition of Human Events Daily.
00:03:16.120We're here live, Real America's Voice.
00:09:07.180Alright, I want to get Will Chamberlain
00:09:09.200on here article three project and it's been a minute since we've had him on so i want to get
00:09:14.340him back will how's it going man always gonna be with you jack so will you know this week uh tyler
00:09:21.060robinson had yet another hearing um i don't know if you uh caught the hearing in full but the big
00:09:27.120news that came out of that was that the this motion that tyler robinson's lawyers had made
00:09:32.340the defense team regarding the striking down the prosecutor and who and and in fact they were
00:09:38.680actually trying to strike down the entire prosecutorial team in Utah County for because
00:09:44.320of the fact that his daughter, one of the prosecutor's daughters, not the main the main
00:09:48.600attorney, but one of the prosecutor's daughters had been in attendance at Utah Valley University
00:09:54.320when when when Charlie was shot and killed.
00:09:57.940And they were trying to say that this creates a conflict of interest and therefore that
00:10:02.680it biased the the prosecutors and that they should be should be removed from the case.
00:10:08.680And the judge ruled against that. And there was a statement, Will, that he made. And I was wondering if you could unpack that for us, where he said he was talking about bias and he was talking about conflicts of interest.
00:10:20.440And he was saying that a conflict of interest isn't really appropriate here. I'm paraphrasing because there's no the interest is in protecting the public here.
00:10:29.640This isn't a conflict where, you know, someone who had a financial relationship or someone worked with someone or something like that.
00:10:35.540So protecting, you know, and this isn't a material witness or victim in this case, so there's no direct connection there.
00:10:43.200And so the conflict of interest doesn't really hold up because that's not what conflict of interest means.
00:10:47.760But he also pointed out that the bias of the prosecutor should always be protection of the public because this is the entire point of the doing of justice, of upholding justice and seeking justice, the role of the prosecutor.
00:11:01.400And the judge said, and I just I it blew me away because, you know, in this day and age, we don't hear this kind of talk very much.
00:11:08.380He said the point of the prosecutor that if the prosecutor believes that an individual has committed a crime and rightfully believes that this person has committed a heinous crime, then he has a duty and, in fact, an obligation to seek the maximum and fullest penalty for that individual.
00:11:27.460So, Will, I want to know if you could unpack that a little bit for us, just kind of in this woke social justice era.
00:11:33.060You don't usually hear people talking like this.
00:11:38.340I mean, on the conflict of interest front, I mean, a conflict of interest is always when there is a interest of the prosecutor that is distinct from the broader interests of the public.
00:11:50.980So, you know, in a case where if the if the prosecutor would personally benefit in a unique way or personally suffer in a unique way, if the decision came out in a particular manner, that's where a conflict of interest lies.
00:12:02.860And that's where always where a conflict of interest lies. Like, you know, we that's it's self-dealing and there's not going to be any self-dealing here.
00:12:09.280I mean, what is even in a world where there was some, you know, the prosecutor was uniquely outraged by Tyler Robinson's conduct as a result of that her daughter is here.
00:12:19.600Well, then again, it wouldn't it wouldn't mean that his his interest was unique or distinct from that of the public.
00:12:25.880It's completely aligned or that his interest wouldn't be distinct from that of the prosecutor to seek and do justice.
00:12:32.100That would be aligned. So it doesn't make sense.
00:12:35.740And it's good to see people understand that, you know, in a world of criminal justice reform and all this talk about the rights of criminals,
00:12:41.960people forget that the purpose of the prosecutor and the role of the state is to do justice.
00:12:46.420and sometimes justice for serious crimes is serious punishment and to seek the maximum
00:12:51.540punishment under the law. So it's good to see a judge understand that.
00:12:55.760No, it really was. And look, he treated, I think, the motion fairly. He held hearings on this. He
00:13:02.380called witnesses. He had people testify. I mean, he certainly gave it as the cliche goes. It had
00:13:08.680its day in court. And he came down and said, look, there's no, I like how you put that,
00:13:14.220there's no deferring interest here. The interest of the public and the interest of the prosecutor
00:13:18.240are in complete alignment here. So there's no different because, you know, and, and, and of
00:13:22.900course I was listening to another, uh, commentator talk about this and she pointed out that Andrew
00:13:28.020Burkhart, and she said that, um, that, you know, if you're in a small town, it's, it's kind of hard
00:13:34.900to, you know, if there's a court case and someone happens to be walking by, you know, you know,
00:13:40.280in there, they witness it and they might be related to somebody in an incidental way,
00:13:45.120then that doesn't create a conflict of interest. That's just living in a small town. You still
00:13:49.420have to, you have to have the case. You have to be able to do all of this. The town might only
00:13:52.860have, what, three, four defense lawyers, depending on where you are, and potentially a small bench
00:13:58.620as well. And so, you know, the idea is, as you say, that the interest of justice and the interest
00:14:04.580of the public aren't, it's not that they shouldn't be aligned. It's that they are supposed to be
00:14:08.700aligned. That's the whole system. Yes, correct. That's what the, you know, the public does better
00:14:13.600when there is justice done. That's the entire purpose of our legal system. So it's why, you0.92
00:14:18.020know, why, you know, the idea is that everybody gets a chance to vote on representatives who
00:14:21.560then write the laws. The, the enforcement of those laws is in the public interest.
00:14:27.920The idea that there was a conflict here was always ridiculous.
00:14:32.180Well, and we'll, so to go back to that then is, and you and I have greatly said, and I know that,
00:14:37.040you know, credit to you as well, because this always just seemed like a very desperate delay
00:14:42.240tactic. And if this early in the case, we're already hearing and seeing these delay tactics
00:14:48.280is, is the reason for that, that Tyler Robinson side just doesn't have very strong of a case.
00:14:54.520Oh, of course they don't. I mean, there's, there's a huge amount of physical evidence,
00:14:58.820video evidence that points to Tyler Robinson. I mean, I think you posted about it, but there's
00:15:04.140dna everywhere and and the dna is robinson's showing up on the gun showing up on the on the
00:15:10.140roof showing up any number of you know in the places where that the figure the in glasses
00:15:16.540carrying the gun was and and by the way that figure in the glasses looks a lot like tyler
00:15:21.420robinson he's walking around just like you would walk around if you had a long uh long-range rifle
00:15:26.200and you were trying to carry it discreetly in your pants i mean you can only be so discreet you have
00:15:30.280to walk the way Robinson was walking. But the physical evidence is overwhelming. The motive is
00:15:36.300there. It's on the bullets. It's on everything. And so, you know, the idea that they're like,
00:15:44.700I mean, there's some really good case that they're going to, you know, they're going to pull out some
00:15:47.920witness who's going to be like, actually, I saw the real killer. It's not Robinson. It's laughable.
00:15:52.480There's way, way, way too much. So you have to sort of figure out a way to delay things. You
00:15:58.820have to figure out, you know, do what I mean, and I don't blame the defense lawyers, their job is to
00:16:02.980be a zealous advocate for their client, not gonna blame them for filing any motion that's non
00:16:07.040frivolous. And I don't think this motion was frivolous. It's like, colorable, it's just not
00:16:13.320going to win. There's a difference between a frivolous argument and argument that's never
00:16:16.380going to win. And so what I what I threw out here, yeah, you're referring to this post that I made,
00:16:23.000and, you know, about it just walking through the trigger, the bolt handle everywhere that you
00:16:27.820would expect him to touch if you were working the action, the towel he used as a cheek rest,
00:16:32.440the screwdriver, which he left behind, even inside the spent casing. And so all of that,
00:16:39.700you know, all of that needs to come up in court. And so you've got him on the roof. You've got him
00:16:46.800with the what you've got. So he's on the roof. You were able to place him there. Then you have
00:16:50.560to place him with place the gun in his hands, which they do through the when you're reading
00:16:54.820these affidavits, they're walking you through the elements of the case. So we can identify
00:17:00.180this individual. Well, let me get to that in a second. But this individual is identified
00:17:04.500on the location. He's then identified with the weapon in his hands. So he is there.
00:17:08.560He does have the means motive and opportunity to be able to commit the crime. And then the
00:17:14.640piece I wanted to throw out is it gets into the fact that these statements which are made
00:17:19.820an affidavit. Well, just for people to understand, they need to be backed up in court. What we're
00:17:25.640seeing in the affidavit, of course, this is the charging document, but all of this has to be
00:17:30.480backed up. And so just simple question, well, would a prosecutor submit something like that
00:17:36.320if they knew that it could be easily just laughed out of court if it didn't hold up based on their
00:17:42.460own ballistics reporting, genetics recording, et cetera, et cetera? No, they wouldn't be
00:17:46.780introducing it themselves, they'd be hoping that the other side ignores it if it were not coming
00:17:50.560out the way that they expected it to. If anything, they might have started investigating other
00:17:54.680potential defendants if they couldn't find Robinson's DNA on places where they expected
00:17:59.200it. And they found a variety of other people's DNA. But clearly that's not. And I mean, if they
00:18:03.960were all lying, I mean, one lie here would then undermine the entire credibility of the prosecution
00:18:10.080because then what else are they lying about? So say they put in a piece of evidence and made all
00:18:14.920these claims about robinson's dna being on it and they the robinson's team was able to put up an
00:18:19.760expert explaining persuasively that it's all bs well then that's not just the lack you don't just
00:18:25.300lose this one piece of evidence you lose your credibility across the evidence you're putting
00:18:29.000forward in the entire case i mean you're gonna that's gonna be reasonable doubt right there
00:18:32.500because the jury will reasonably think they can't believe you so prosecutors don't do stuff like
00:18:37.840that unless they're completely and utterly incompetent and the they wouldn't the utah county
00:18:42.180attorney attorney's office the district attorney's office knows that the focus of the country is
00:18:47.980going to be on this trial they're going to put their most experienced prosecutors on it people
00:18:50.940who've done murder trials before or people who've done other serious crimes people who don't make
00:18:55.240mistakes like this that's that's been my read on this from the start jack posovic will chamberlain
00:19:00.340we're talking about the tyler robinson case the murder of charlie kirk right back
00:19:04.260talk about influences these are influences and uh they're friends of mine jack you're so like
00:19:13.900where's jack jack he's got a great job
00:19:17.520all right jack was so big here we are human events daily real america's voice i want to go
00:19:26.880back now to we're talking about tyler robinson we're talking about this case
00:19:30.700and I want to go back to the affidavit.
00:19:34.820So we went through, of course, the forensic evidence.
00:19:37.680Now I want to get into the identification.
00:19:40.340And this is where the chain really begins
00:22:31.380Just knowing that whatever life you had, whatever hopes and dreams you had for your child,
00:22:38.540it's it's all going to be gone after you pick up that call you pick up that phone it's all gone
00:22:43.340i still hope i could you know you you don't know that you would until you get there but you hope
00:22:47.140that you could because it is it is a it's a fundamentally pro-civilizational thing it's
00:22:51.940it's what differs us from uh really deeply tribal and clannish civilizations where they would try to
00:22:57.400help their children get away first world behavior first world behavior yes of the highest order
00:23:03.200the highest order first world behavior yeah and credit to his parents for doing that honestly
00:23:08.380Like, credit to them. That must have been an extremely hard thing for them to do. And they still, they did the right thing and ensured that he is now in custody and will face a trial and justice.
00:23:20.740And we know that, you know, I saw some reporting from Brian Netton over at News Nation that, you know, that his parents have accompanied or not accompanied, but have appeared in in court for the in-person hearings that Tyler has had.
00:23:36.620He reported that the mother was just just sobbing, you know, pretty much the entire time during the proceedings.
00:23:42.940Father, you know, looking pretty stoic.
00:23:45.700And, you know, and I've seen in this, this comes up online, you know, every time I seem to tweet about this, that they say, well, what if, you know, what if they were coerced?
00:23:55.220What if they were, you know, what if they did it for some other reason?
00:23:58.900And I just keep thinking, well, if they thought he was innocent, why not, you know, if for some reason, let's, okay, devil's advocate, you know, let's say they decided they wanted to recant, I mean, they'd be able to amend their statements, right?
00:24:14.200Oh, sure. Yeah, maybe if they felt coerced, gosh, that would be the story of the century.
00:24:18.720And they'd immediately get a lot of protection if there were some good faith basis on which they could explain why they were being coerced and who coerced them.
00:24:26.240uh but moreover like what what parent would allow themselves and to be coerced into giving up their
00:24:31.400own child uh that's insane uh a parent would i every you know i can speak from i know for my
00:24:39.100there's no world in which i would be could be coerced to hand over my daughter to something
00:24:45.540unjust like i couldn't you couldn't i would die i would i would sooner and you see this by the way
00:24:51.060you, you, and you see, you do tend to see parents who, you know, even try to turn themselves in
00:24:56.480and, you know, claim, you know, claim the blame over and over. I could see myself doing something
00:25:01.480like that. Um, I just, out of loyalty to the child and out of love for them and, and, you know,
00:25:07.240that irrational love that parents have for their children, which we, you need to have if you want
00:25:11.840your society to continue. Um, but it's, you know, the idea to me, to me, the part where this,
00:25:18.600you know, this question just falls apart is that the parents are right there. They are right there.
00:25:26.100And the media is right there every day as well, you know, fully free to be able to take any
00:25:31.740statement. The court is right there. And I would say that to anyone, to anyone who thinks that
00:25:38.080they have, you know, oh, I've got it. I've got the evidence. I've got the one piece that,
00:25:43.100you know, proves Tyler Robinson is innocent. Well, guess what? There's a court case going
00:25:48.080on right now. And in this trial, as it turns out, that's the very question that we are trying to
00:25:54.400determine. And feel free, feel free to submit anything you have in writing to the court.
00:26:01.240And I would encourage anyone to do so. I certainly, you know, I certainly think I would say now is the
00:26:06.800time to do that, right? Yeah. And here's the thing I would say, I mean, not that his parents have
00:26:11.360spoken up publicly, but I guarantee you that with, you know, this random idea that you found some
00:26:16.020unique piece of evidence that exonerates tyler i guarantee his parents don't agree with you
00:26:20.460i guarantee his parents would think you're a lunatic like they know their conduct demonstrates
00:26:25.460they know exactly what happened here um and i mean that's not gonna be like the way it's gonna
00:26:29.440work but they know i just i feel like their conduct is is it's while it's honorable and
00:26:35.180it's tragic it it's also and it's because it's so tragic that's how you know it confirms
00:28:33.760We're getting new information that's coming out of the Clinton deposition on Jeffrey Epstein.
00:28:40.700Per Representative Comer, President Clinton testified under oath that that President Trump has never said anything to me to make me think he was involved with Epstein.
00:28:55.440Even Bill Clinton himself is saying that Trump was not involved with Epstein.
00:29:02.080So Bill Clinton himself, who has every reason to try to throw Trump under the bus, to try to bring him up, to try to to muddy the waters, to try to get the stink off of him, get the heat off of him.
00:29:15.380Bill Clinton is in there, according to this report, saying that Donald Trump wasn't involved with Epstein.
00:29:24.920I don't know what else you need, folks.
00:29:26.800I don't know what else you need on this.
00:29:31.600We've got every single one. But even when pushed, even when pushed back against the wall, Bill Clinton did not.
00:29:41.060And remember, by the way, Bill Clinton is no stranger to committing perjury under depositions.
00:29:46.280All right. We certainly are well and sure aware that he has done so in the past.
00:29:53.220Remember, I did not have sexual relations with that woman.
00:29:55.980OK, that was perjury. You obviously had sexual relations with Monica Lewinsky.
00:30:00.300But the point is that he lied under oath about that.
00:30:03.260But even still, he is coming up and saying that Donald Trump not involved with Jeffrey Epstein.
00:30:11.800Wanted to shift gears a little bit because, as we've seen over the evening, a lot more has gone on.
00:30:18.480Israel, Iran, the United States, this deployment, forces deployed.
00:30:22.680And a really interesting kind of new wrinkle that's been added to all of this is the wrinkle of Chinese imagery and Chinese commercial imagery that's coming out publicly from what it's called Mizar Vision.
00:30:40.000And I want to throw some of these images up for folks to see that what China is now doing is collecting commercial real-time imagery of U.S. F-22s sitting there parked right on the runway in Israel, right there on these sites.
00:30:59.280Now, this is imagery at a level, you know, that's really just at a level.
00:32:04.820And the Ford, of course, arrived to Israel just off the coast of Haifa, which is the port of Jerusalem, the port of Tel Aviv, just a few hours ago.
00:32:17.520So USS Ford, they're providing that defensive framework along with the Iron Dome as we potentially are waiting to see whether or not these operations, combat operations, are set to kick off.
00:32:31.620I wanted to get in now. Darren Selnick is joining us. He's a former deputy chief of staff, the secretary of war, Pete Hegseth. Darren, how are you?
00:32:42.980Well, thanks for joining us. Well, look, I was just going through and you as well as I, I'm sure, you know, coming from this background, we're not used to seeing this type of imagery public, are we?
00:32:52.500no that's why they have skiffs in the pentagon but uh uh yeah that tells you something when1.00
00:33:00.360you're seeing public not good not good yeah it's it's it's really just a uh you know the chinese0.94
00:33:06.260certainly using their showing off showcasing their capabilities this is another example of0.94
00:33:11.020information warfare that the chinese communist party are going to bring to bear uh you know i0.89
00:33:15.040noticed that the chinese haven't been doing this for the russians and in any of their ukraine
00:33:18.920operations, but certainly something that going forward, this is just the world we live in now.0.90
00:33:25.220It is. That's why, you know, China is a top threat that we have to contend with and that0.96
00:33:30.460we are, you know, when I was at DOW, that we were focusing on. And it's ultimately,0.99
00:33:38.300my personal opinion, China is going to be our greatest threat. And we have to deal with it.1.00
00:33:43.180There's no question about that. And I completely concur with you there. No, looking at the force
00:33:47.920laydown, the forces aligned that President Trump has deployed out to the Gulf, out to CENTCOM.
00:33:54.540What is your read in what we may see? We're hearing that potentially strikes could
00:34:00.000occur as early as this weekend. Yeah, I'm hearing some of the same stuff.
00:34:08.140I think one of the things that was accurately reported by the media that I saw today,
00:34:13.100they said the president said he hasn't made a final decision. And I think that's correct.0.91
00:34:17.040When I was in the White House and Trump won and we worked on things, my experience with the president is that he talked to all all relevant people to talk to that had information, got all sides and would not make a decision until the very last second because facts on the ground change.
00:34:38.020So when he makes a decision, that decision is final, but he doesn't preordain those decisions because things can change.
00:35:11.640I'm sure they have presented a number of options to the president.
00:35:14.620The president will pick the option that will do the, you know, my guess, the least amount of, you know, strength that they need.
00:35:24.420Use the appropriate force that you need to get the appropriate outcome.
00:35:27.820So I think that's what the president will pick.
00:35:29.600He will make the estimate. Remember, he has the intelligence and the other that has facts on the ground that we don't have, that Congress doesn't have.
00:35:36.520So he will pick the military option that he believes is the right option to get Iran to take this seriously and do what they need to do.0.74
00:35:43.620He won't do more than necessary. He won't do less than necessary. He will pick the option that is what is necessary to get the desired result.0.73
00:35:51.420He did Iran before. He did Gaza. He's got a lot of experience.0.93
00:35:56.380I have total faith and trust that he will pick the option needed.
00:36:00.100And I would take his gut reaction and what he believes over anyone else.
00:36:06.220And I think that we actually have a new statement from the president on this just just moments ago.
00:37:00.520President Trump employing, I believe they call that strategic ambiguity.
00:37:05.140Well, it is strategic ambiguity, but it's also he's going to continue to get reports in from the military side, from his diplomatic team.
00:37:15.020You know, Marco Rubio is going to be weighing in.
00:37:17.480The diplomatic team is going to be weighing in.
00:37:19.360And at some point, he's going to just make a decision that, hey, you know, I don't either that they have went ahead and made a breakthrough or not.
00:39:35.060If President Trump is going to conduct limited strikes and take out a specific piece of the nuclear program, something that had to be, you know, something along the lines of Operation Midnight Hammer, that's one thing.
00:39:51.540But ultimately, this idea that we're going to go in and knock off the Ayatollah and the mullahs and just get the best government we want, I just I think it's folly.
00:40:01.840We did the entire podcast series, Tales of Regime Change, just a couple of weeks ago.0.69