Human Events Daily with Jack Posobiec - April 13, 2024


THOUGHTCRIME Ep. 39 — Tucker vs. Israel? Abortion and 2024? Who Broke Marriage?


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 10 minutes

Words per Minute

188.30177

Word Count

13,284

Sentence Count

16

Misogynist Sentences

24

Hate Speech Sentences

23


Summary

In the wake of the Supreme Court ruling in favor of abortion rights in Arizonas, the question is, who wants to walk on Arizonans? Will abortion be legalized in the state of Arizona? Will it be abortion in any other swing state?


Transcript

00:00:00.000 from the age of big brother if they want to get you they'll get you dnsa specifically
00:00:10.340 targets the communications of everyone they're collecting your communications
00:00:15.000 okay it is thought crime time everybody in the studio we only have one person producer andrew
00:00:27.740 hey only only me well just only one person remote is blake blake uh you're blocking the eclipse
00:00:35.740 yes my the eclipse is over it was great i know you just think it was a bunch of clouds it was
00:00:42.420 like a dark object it went dark for a bit it gets dark every night but it was actually pretty fun
00:00:47.980 i have to say it was a quasi-spiritual experience some people say jack did what'd you do for the
00:00:53.120 eclipse i um i made sure to look directly at it for as long as possible to gain the supernatural
00:01:01.600 powers for the 2024 election now i didn't travel like blake did uh people don't realize this but
00:01:09.180 blake is actually part of a group of uh eclipse worshipers and uh they travel to every single
00:01:14.640 eclipse around the world it's a you know kind of a reddit thing that they do and um you know when
00:01:21.160 they're not when they're not in their prayer circles praying to dr fauci they go and pray to
00:01:25.480 the eclipses well speaking of supernatural powers we might need it uh after the latest supreme court
00:01:31.700 decision in arizona who wants to walk on arizona what's uh what's that uh something significant uh
00:01:38.920 who wants to walk us through it a blake or andrew andrew you want to take it you know i uh i think
00:01:43.680 you know we we we have a good rundown here and let me just make sure i i pull it up but yeah i mean
00:01:48.680 basically we have a okay so there was a 15-week law that was the law of the land in arizona
00:01:56.140 that was predicated on the fact that roe v wade was also the law of the land but then roe v wade gets
00:02:04.440 overturned by the supreme court which basically nullifies this 15-week ban that was in arizona
00:02:11.120 uh doug ducey's uh abortion law and what that did is it sent it back to a civil war era law when
00:02:18.600 arizona was still a territory and that law basically uh outlaws all abortion in the state of arizona
00:02:25.280 this obviously has massive political implications for a lot of reasons arizona was polling in such
00:02:31.820 a way that we were hearing rumors that biden and the democrats were not putting much hope in arizona at
00:02:37.580 all right is one of the key swing states you would have expected the opposite but their polling
00:02:41.700 and their internals and the work that turning point action is doing was all leading to a uh a
00:02:46.660 predicament for them where they were not investing in arizona as you might expect well i think all that
00:02:51.960 changed yesterday um one thing that i think is important to to understand so this is the this is the
00:02:59.020 logic of the left they think if abortion now becomes the issue that that will drive low propensity
00:03:06.040 democrat abortion loving people to the polls and therefore whatever deficit that joe biden was
00:03:12.760 experiencing is now going to be made up by these low prop pro they're going all in on it and they're
00:03:17.040 going all in on it right so what people need to understand is that there already was an abortion
00:03:22.000 uh uh the issue was going to be on the ballot via referendum in arizona so there was already going
00:03:29.680 to be an abortion uh issue on the on the ballot and the only other swing state where that's true
00:03:35.500 is nevada which actually is very interesting to me charlie with everything everything that we've
00:03:40.900 been talking about with nebraska and forcing joe biden to play in the sunbelt well nevada and arizona
00:03:47.960 have abortion on the on the ballot so it's been a very chaotic uh last 24 hours last 48 hours because
00:03:55.640 uh there there seems to be a predisposition by conservatives to basically toss the the life
00:04:03.260 issue out right so trump preempts this on monday right or is that on tuesday maybe it was on tuesday
00:04:08.660 i apologize it was monday monday day of the eclipse yeah so trump preempts it issues his his statement
00:04:13.720 throwing it back to the states and incredibly the next day this arizona supreme court ruling comes out
00:04:20.020 um and basically says that the law the land is still this civil war era law so everybody's confused
00:04:26.380 what it means charlie you've got some interesting ideas i think we need to get into uh and then and
00:04:31.000 then in the legislative session out of arizona all hell's breaking loose the the democrats are yelling
00:04:36.200 shame and there's blood on your hands inside of the uh legislation inside the house here in arizona i
00:04:43.040 mean it's it's it's a very wild scenario and a very live ball this is look the the democrats have
00:04:49.160 one maybe two attack vectors the only other attack vector they have is taking donald trump off the
00:04:53.440 ballot and that didn't happen and number two was roe v wade and abortion and our side is currently
00:04:59.240 very disorganized on this not unified and i mean i'll tell you i'm getting it from both sides right
00:05:05.100 now and i i've been i'm not me because actually people respect my opinions on this i i've gotten a
00:05:11.540 little bit of ridicule and condemnation but by both sides let me explain i have pastor group chats
00:05:16.920 of people that are incensed that the republican party is not saying the arizona ban is not the
00:05:22.100 best thing ever that's number one saying that cary lake and trump should come out and say this is the
00:05:27.800 best thing ever we should make it the law of the land then i have other people on the other side that
00:05:31.420 are patriots donors and activists alike that say we need to make this a non-issue or else we're going
00:05:35.880 to get obliterated in november and so you kind of have these two factions and they're all one sec
00:05:42.540 jack they're all calling each other's names they're all calling you know all pointing fingers
00:05:46.620 at one another and my position was love the ruling i want abortion to not be the law of the land
00:05:52.300 bad timing why it's not even a close fit to the will of the people and if you have something that
00:05:58.320 is not in the fit the will of the people it's not sustainable and it also creates massive political
00:06:03.840 backlash so that's my position as i said try to get something on the ballot that is a pro-life win
00:06:09.440 which would be a heartbeat bill and i think that we have the best most prudent reasonable solution
00:06:14.160 that's been proposed but i i am not afraid i don't care how much this gets clipped by the media
00:06:19.120 to state this is a problem it's a problem and acting as if it doesn't exist is is foolish jack
00:06:27.260 please sorry i had to get that all out no no and and we should of course bring up our positions but
00:06:33.680 before we get to that uh on this and and i'll even say you know i i said first and foremost
00:06:39.280 because this is such a problem uh right now that we should lead the show with this and we're not
00:06:44.540 even planning to talk about it this week but here's something that and i say this as a non-arizonian that
00:06:49.600 that is confusing to me that in the ruling from the state supreme court if i have this correct
00:06:55.080 so doug ducey passes this 15-week bill back in 2022 so even under dobbs or even under roe v wade i guess
00:07:04.700 it was at the time i think um it dobbs hadn't been finalized yet that hadn't been issued yet and so
00:07:10.840 wouldn't this 2022 law supersede the 1854 law and i guess the state supreme court if i if i have this
00:07:20.240 correct and you know correct me if i'm wrong but i was talking to you know someone who's one of those
00:07:24.220 law talking guys and said well essentially the 2022 bill doesn't include language that says that
00:07:30.460 supersedes it and essentially the state supreme court said look we essentially say that it's a
00:07:36.860 situation where both laws are now in effect at the same time because of the 2022 law not including that
00:07:42.880 language the court didn't want to interpret things into it that were not there and then basically
00:07:48.400 punts it back to the legislature and says look you guys pass this stuff you go fix it is is that the
00:07:54.500 situation because i still don't quite understand why the 2022 law doesn't itself just supersede the
00:08:00.720 original law blake you would have an answer on that i mean i literally have the law open right now and
00:08:07.660 i'm checking it but my guess frankly is this was the thing that you saw with pro-life activists in many
00:08:15.020 states which is obviously pro-life activists want to ban abortion but they also were aware for 50 years
00:08:22.500 that the supreme court has restricted their ability to do that and so there was always the pro-life push
00:08:28.920 of pass the most pro-life law that will survive a court challenge try to gradually undermine it by
00:08:34.880 getting the supreme court to allow further and further bans so what you would get in states i know when i was
00:08:41.600 growing up in south dakota they would have things like this is they would have laws that essentially are
00:08:47.480 this is the law because of the current supreme court situation if the supreme court's ruling were
00:08:53.500 to change completely if roe were to go away we would have a new law come into play sometimes they
00:08:58.660 would call these trigger laws as in so if they pull the trigger and get rid of roe a stricter law
00:09:03.600 comes into play and that's actually why several other states do have strict abortion laws going right
00:09:08.720 now and so i suspect that the way the arizona 15-week ban was constructed is pro-lifers didn't want to
00:09:18.160 repeal the stricter law they had if that suddenly became and i suspect that's what came into play here
00:09:26.440 that made this happen yeah so that what i what i don't appreciate is some of the conversations i've
00:09:34.000 had around this is punting andrew and you were you were you know some of these conversations people
00:09:39.380 say oh don't worry about it we'll just kind of figure it out i i think that's foolish i think
00:09:43.300 it's short-sighted and i think the democrats are salivating at the one lane they have to overachieve
00:09:50.900 a dismal record coming into november yeah if you act like this doesn't exist then you're essentially
00:09:56.180 creating a vacuum that democrats are going to fill so you've got it you've got to come out with
00:10:00.200 something that that at least offers an alternative and there's a couple reasons why charlie you you
00:10:06.900 know i think that the republicans can be guilty of taking the pro-life vote for granted and what you
00:10:12.200 want is you want something that will inspire the pro-life vote that will get the activists out and
00:10:17.960 get them on board i think i think to your recommendation of a heartbeat bill you know these
00:10:22.660 this is about the strictest laws that are getting passed it plays offense on the top plays offense and
00:10:27.140 actually i mean you know it what's ironic about the psychology of this is because if nothing gets
00:10:33.940 done yeah in theory you could get the 1864 law right but that's not going to happen like this if
00:10:40.600 you do if you do not have something else on the ballot guess what's going to happen you're going
00:10:44.600 to have unlimited late-term abortion because that's the referendum that's already on the ballot in
00:10:48.660 november right that's going to pass if you don't do anything you're going to have late-term abortions
00:10:53.140 so the heartbeat bill is about as aggressive as a precedent that we've seen set in the country
00:10:58.460 we've seen it in arizona uh texas has something similar blake uh jack you probably know the other
00:11:03.980 states but this is acts actually an opportunity to go on the offense to get excited about it get
00:11:09.640 inspired by it and actually you know sort of take some of the the wind out of the other side's sails
00:11:14.360 and here's the other thing and jack i'd specifically love your instincts on this but
00:11:19.000 the fact that trump came out the day before and preempted that is either really just good politics
00:11:26.780 or it just happened to be a stroke of luck whether they plan this or not uh knowing what i know about
00:11:32.200 uh politics i i tend to think it was probably lucky but you know does that give us an opportunity from a
00:11:40.340 messaging standpoint to sort of decouple top of ticket from down ballot issues for example can can
00:11:46.660 enough voters in the state of arizona separate the fact that trump is saying hey i want to give it to
00:11:53.040 the states let the will of the votes the voters uh prevail in the state but i'm still going to pull
00:11:58.480 the pull the lever for trump how many in a state like arizona do you see people voting for maybe a
00:12:05.120 pro-abortion stance but also pulling the trigger for trump 20 to 30 well to answer your question yeah i
00:12:10.900 think there's a percentage but let's also point out that it's so even with donald trump kind of
00:12:16.760 putting out his statement which is you know it is not as saying it should be at the states it should
00:12:22.240 be at the state level and saying that he doesn't want to get behind a federal ban then uh you know
00:12:26.700 people you've got people on the pro-life side saying this is this is essentially pro-choice you've
00:12:31.820 got other people saying no it's pro-life just not at the federal level um but i would also point out
00:12:36.800 that donald trump isn't the only candidate on the ballot because they're definitely going to be two
00:12:41.380 or potentially more than two candidates that are pro-choice so you've got joe biden who's pro-choice
00:12:47.760 then you're going to have rfk who is a who's polling at uh i'd have to pull up the latest arizona
00:12:53.660 poll to see but he's pulling a 12 13 percent in a lot of these swing states and then you're also
00:12:58.160 going to have jill stein you're going to have cornell west so there's also so it's it's not just a
00:13:01.920 possibility of trump pulling over some of that vote but also how much of that vote is going to
00:13:07.640 be split across these presidential candidates is something we're gonna have to look at yeah and
00:13:12.280 look i i was texting with some pastors about this and i can read a room really well and i've been
00:13:17.600 saying this i've been warning people about this if i go and speak and i talk about the reversal of
00:13:21.500 roe versus wade i get golf claps at churches if i say that we need to ban transgender care
00:13:27.520 enthusiastic you know response if i say that we need to deport illegals cheering but there is a
00:13:33.640 huge discomfort with rank-and-file christians with the ideal of banning abortion they just it's just
00:13:40.540 too radical for many christians or it's it's not i think yeah go ahead go ahead like i just think that's
00:13:45.980 a colossal failure on the part of of christian leaders of course it is like i think certainly
00:13:52.380 within the catholic church it's well known that there's a big split where you have some priests
00:13:56.840 who are very adamant on it and you have some who are terrified to ever talk about it and morally
00:14:03.080 i think that's completely unacceptable and i think it has to be regarded as unacceptable
00:14:06.660 in the in protestant churches as well if you know if a pastor is going to be brave enough to defy
00:14:14.240 a covid ban if they're going to be brave enough to oppose child mutilation why can't they be brave
00:14:19.300 enough to say yeah if you're a christian you have to regard abortion as extremely wrong and extremely
00:14:24.540 people and something that we need to get rid of that's just less than you have to say it all the
00:14:28.840 time because otherwise people don't hear it and it's less than five percent right it's less than
00:14:33.180 five percent of pastors that would be saying that well yeah and and i think you had a conversation
00:14:38.120 with matt walsh that was really really good on this and i encourage people to go back on the podcast
00:14:41.800 and listen to it but you know we are constantly hounded as conservatives to retreat on these issues
00:14:48.760 we don't have a choice right now we have to we have to we have to go on offense yeah no we have to
00:14:54.260 but here's the thing they told us they told us the same on immigration yeah they told us we had to give
00:14:59.860 amnesty to win the votes we had to go give amnesty trump proved everybody wrong now i understand that
00:15:05.420 abortion is a different issue than than immigration and you know the trans issue is different guns are
00:15:12.040 different but at the same time i do believe that that if the conservative movement loses its moral
00:15:18.960 clarity on the issue of abortion we will pay for it tenfold that being said this is why i like your
00:15:25.760 idea so much if we put together an alternative a heartbeat bill not only are you going to uh give
00:15:34.440 the base something to get excited about you still might lose in the polls and if you lose the polls then
00:15:39.100 we have an opportunity to say guess what we have more convincing to do more persuading to do we know
00:15:44.280 we have but hopefully hopefully that could if we're going to lose a little bit on abortion maybe we're
00:15:49.640 going to make it up a little bit by just offering an alternative and to jack's point i think looking at
00:15:53.940 the polls jack rfk is polling at an average of 10.4 percent in arizona right now the numbers are
00:16:00.680 according to the hill uh election hq 42.5 percent average for trump 36.6 percent average for biden and 10.4
00:16:08.760 average for rfk and i completely believe that with our ballot chase in arizona which we're we're we're
00:16:17.280 we're trying to get like hundreds of thousands of votes in this ballot chase we're hiring like crazy
00:16:22.440 right now so this is a big operation if you couple that with rfk you offer an alternative you give
00:16:28.900 something people to get cited excited about this i mean there is do not press panic yet there is an
00:16:35.540 urgency but we can win arizona there needs to be and i don't think the legislature's into this what
00:16:39.560 i think the arizona legislature is likely to do based on just public reporting is i bet they're
00:16:44.260 likely to capitulate and put something on katie hobb's desk as some sort of bargain like a 26 week
00:16:49.700 limit that would be a mistake or a 15 week limit to reinstitute what do see had do see and only have
00:16:56.180 the term go status quo yeah what about what about just a compromise to say they're gonna and and
00:17:02.800 again i'm going to come back to this because the heartbeat bill that's a ton of work and a lot of
00:17:06.780 time that we frankly don't don't have i'm not against it but i'm saying that is that what about
00:17:11.400 the compromise to just say we're we're gonna we want the 2022 law to go in because that's the one
00:17:16.480 we all voted for at the time well yeah the 2022 law will the democrats will probably block that though
00:17:22.220 that's the point is that some of the republicans are not gonna the the this is what and i would
00:17:27.420 love to see polling i blake america's actually becoming more pro-abortion and this is not a big
00:17:34.160 surprise this is something i think if there's a big failure of the pro-life movement i think it was
00:17:38.680 failing to anticipate this but it's understandable because it happens a lot it happens so often in
00:17:44.320 fact that this is something that like political scholars wrote about in the past they called it the
00:17:49.820 hollow hope which is generally people like activist groups see a supreme court win as this uh
00:17:57.320 culmination that will like burst you know once they get their win at the supreme court they'll get
00:18:01.600 everything else they want to but controversial supreme court rulings usually create backlash if you
00:18:07.060 want past examples when you got like those pro-crime rulings from the supreme court in the 60s miranda
00:18:13.660 versus arizona the backlash was we got tough on crime laws that massively increase criminal penalties
00:18:20.340 you know how long people went to jail and so what you see after dobbs is you know it's not a total
00:18:26.880 wipeout but you're seeing maybe like a 10 shift in terms of who identifies as pro-choice who wants
00:18:34.760 abortion to be legal in all or almost all circumstances you basically i'd say you'd see like a 10 to 15
00:18:41.720 percent of people who in the past were signaling they were somewhat pro-life as like a tribal affiliation
00:18:48.020 and then now that it's a live political issue they're going actually just kidding just kidding please
00:18:53.780 don't change things if i get my girlfriend pregnant i want to make it go away and that just seems to be
00:19:00.940 the situation as it is right now but i do agree i don't i certainly as someone who like you guys cares a lot
00:19:08.220 about the pro-life movement there's several things in play first of all it's a very powerful moral
00:19:14.500 issue and it's one that is kind of abstract you know the unborn are kind of difficult to see for
00:19:21.920 the most part uh it does require a certain sort of abstract moral reasoning and as a result it's
00:19:27.480 very dependent on people getting really really fired up about it and so it's a difficult thing to
00:19:32.360 handle because the only way we're ever going to get wins on it is to really whip people up to care
00:19:39.360 a lot about it and the inevitable side effect of that is we're going to have people who care a lot
00:19:45.680 about it who are absolutists on the issue who reject all compromise on the issue and if you want
00:19:51.640 a good comparison look at the abolitionist movement in the 1800s you would have you know people
00:19:57.380 abolitionists would attack abraham lincoln because he was not a true enough believer on abolition uh
00:20:03.460 william garrison the founder of the liberator he would say we need to throw out the constitution
00:20:08.120 we should the north should secede from the union because the union has legal slavery you'd have you
00:20:14.060 know you'd have john brown who would try to you know kill people and start slave uprisings you would
00:20:19.020 have radicals on the far end of the issue because that's how passionate it made people and
00:20:27.080 it is going to be like i don't want to i think the big hazard right now is there are fast forces
00:20:34.720 within the republican party that want the pro-life issue to go away they've never cared about it
00:20:40.160 they find these holy rollers annoying they think they're the ones holding the party back from
00:20:46.040 getting everything they want on taxes or whatever and they want to get rid of them and they think they
00:20:50.520 can and this has happened in other countries so as someone who cares a lot about that issue
00:20:55.020 i do think we have to be aware that the big hazard right now is we lose this election they blame it
00:21:01.400 all on the pro-lifers and we never ever get a pro-life bill introduced at the federal level or in any
00:21:07.820 well hold on you know non-super-red state again but blake the first part is actually a bigger hazard
00:21:12.700 which is the loss right and we still have time to make sure we don't lose on the political issue
00:21:19.180 so blake in your in your wisdom politically what can be done if anything to make sure we're not
00:21:25.920 catastrophically you know obliterated on this issue and somehow 2024 becomes a referendum again on
00:21:33.560 abortion as the country is collapsing blake what what what do you think we could do i think i think
00:21:39.400 president trump's statement on monday was a very good start where he manages to say
00:21:44.160 i am pro-life i like the ruling that we did with dobbs but all at the same time i am not going to
00:21:53.900 come in and impose a law that is massively opposed by a large majority of americans that's essentially
00:22:00.380 what he's saying when he says i'm leaving it to the states he's saying i am not going to come in
00:22:05.160 and impose something only 30 or 20 or 15 of the public will back and i think at the federal level
00:22:15.860 you just have to say that anytime they bring up abortion you say you know an abortion ban is not
00:22:21.060 on the ballot for president because president trump says it's not on the ballot and so the only thing you
00:22:26.420 can do is then if you want to have you know the moral counter-attack you say the only person who's
00:22:31.380 making abortion a huge federal issue is joe biden and he wants it legal until birth with taxpayer
00:22:37.220 funding all of that like the most extreme possible one the other way and he wants to get rid of all
00:22:43.540 choice on the issue and i think that's how you can counter-attack to it you say there is no abortion ban
00:22:48.940 on the ballot for president uh at the state level i think that's a tougher one because it goes by
00:22:58.420 by state the arizona situation is going to be complicated like you charlie i i like the law
00:23:03.760 uh i don't know that i don't really know whether you know introducing some other vote as an alternative
00:23:12.420 is the best strategy because you're really just you're tripling down on oh there's all this abortion
00:23:18.220 stuff on the ballot and then there's going to be reporting comparing you know the law with this
00:23:23.520 middle thing but what the pro-abortionists want and it's already going to be on the ballot well i
00:23:28.760 was gonna say it's already on the ballot and this ruling just made it 10 times bigger it made it 10
00:23:34.020 times so now every single young woman in arizona will 100 vote democrat out of fear because they're
00:23:40.600 told to because there's an 1864 law that's going to put your best friend it's easy to blame young
00:23:47.080 women but truthfully i feel what really drives the problem is there's a lot of okay conservative
00:23:54.260 leaning middle-aged women you know people who live in the suburbs women in general those women who go
00:23:59.860 to well i don't even think it's actually it's not overall in the polling on the issue the split
00:24:04.880 between men and women is not dramatic but it's probably if you're looking for women who would
00:24:09.740 vote republican and then have decided to switch their votes just this election over abortion i would say
00:24:16.900 the person you're looking for is like a upper middle class suburban woman so let me just kind
00:24:23.360 of swing voters in general it's very simple that the abortion referendum as it is right now in arizona
00:24:27.860 will pass and will probably pass by 10 points therefore if you want donald trump to become president
00:24:32.640 you need people that want to vote for no restrictions on abortion to also vote for trump period period there
00:24:39.860 is no other path yeah the abortion referendum will pass based on polling they have so much
00:24:46.840 money they have paid circulators and this supreme court decision will make it like way more likely
00:24:51.700 to pass um yeah like way more like they're thrilled and so the question is yes so so so let me ask you
00:24:58.880 that question right you know you you're you guys are arizona um i'm from the other part of the country
00:25:04.600 so are there people enough people like who blake is describing who might be for this initiative
00:25:13.220 but also decide that they i mean i mean think about it right you you say you this is the ballot
00:25:19.600 initiative you can i'm for the ballot initiative because of x y and z but on issues like the economy
00:25:25.640 immigration inflation which is crazy right now i think president trump should be president so
00:25:31.000 basically i guess what i'm saying is are president trump's statements this week and his big statements
00:25:35.700 earlier this week enough to separate himself from that issue we don't know but that's where
00:25:41.580 that's going to be the question joe biden's going to try to run as well as the ballot referendum
00:25:46.020 yeah that's the point just to you know point out there are states where we lost votes related to
00:25:54.320 abortion where we still won other offices in the 2022 and that's even at this direct state state level
00:26:01.160 so i think if you just insist on you know trump's statement you just repeat trump's statement every time
00:26:08.060 it comes up at the federal level you say this is what trump said there is not like the arizona
00:26:12.880 referendum whatever way you feel about it will have no difference on what the president does after
00:26:20.120 this election and i think if you're very adamant on that point you have the added advantage that you
00:26:25.520 can still call out the really radical stuff that democrats want because again democrats want federal
00:26:32.280 funding for all of this they want to make it illegal for doctors to like not perform abortions or not be
00:26:38.340 you know not have to learn how to do abortions they want all of this insane deranged stuff and it is good
00:26:44.440 to have the impulse to hit back on that uh but i do think the most straightforward way is every election
00:26:51.660 that has the presidency on it heavily revolves around that presidential vote and so if you're able to say
00:26:56.860 the presidential vote is not a referendum on abortion say it over and over again the presidential vote is
00:27:02.040 not a referendum on abortion because president trump is not going to do this thing then you
00:27:06.920 actually even spread that out to other offices because how people vote on president is by far the
00:27:11.480 most important yes term of how they vote on every and there is a lot of evidence and data to show
00:27:16.280 that in states like arizona people will split their tickets and they will have nuanced voting patterns
00:27:21.360 down the ballot right well yeah and i and i agree that to the extent that his messaging that
00:27:26.780 were able to decouple this from a referendum on abortion state by state by state including arizona
00:27:32.480 so that people split tickets a good indicator of just how politically savvy even if the pro-life
00:27:39.420 groups were grumbling of how savvy his messaging was on this on on eclipse day on rapture day was that
00:27:47.240 they were really quiet about it the biggest critique of trump's statement on abortion was he's lying
00:27:54.120 we don't believe him right that was the biggest critique he's lying so they knew that he did not
00:28:00.560 the best part is that won't work like a big part one of the best advantages we have is not just
00:28:06.640 that they want to run against abortion but that democrats want to say trump is a theocrat a christian
00:28:13.580 nationalist thing and our best advantage is nobody is going to believe that because charlie the idea
00:28:20.600 that donald trump is a theocrat is absurd charlie are we going to lose any of the pro-life votes we
00:28:26.800 could but i mean the question is how big a number and are they really going to go what are they going
00:28:32.060 to do vote for kennedy go third party i mean that's what's so insane about all i'll read you a text
00:28:37.360 from a pastor and it's just the way it is i think they'll calm down but he says um in good faith i
00:28:42.800 cannot get me or my congress this is a battleground state pastor me i can good faith i can i will not or
00:28:47.080 might get my congregation to vote for trump as long as he continues to say that uh arizona and
00:28:52.400 these other states need to change their abortion laws full ban on abortion zero compromise end of
00:28:57.120 story yeah you know it's almost yeah go ahead jack i was gonna say what's what's interesting about
00:29:04.340 this and and blake you hit on the same thing i was thinking about was that this really is and this
00:29:09.900 what this law does is it provides a kind of the the original law so the pre-civil war law that just
00:29:16.640 kicked in in arizona if this is like the joy reed version of what she says the republican party today
00:29:22.480 represents and what the conservative movement today represents this is the christian nationalism thing
00:29:28.440 right because if you watch joy reed she claims as though and and this is something it's amazing that
00:29:32.800 the left always does this and it goes back to like their version of marxism is that you know they
00:29:37.460 always claim that the the right is totally in power that you know it isn't that the left has been
00:29:42.140 in power since the 1960s no no no it's the right is in power and they're going to impose the uh what's
00:29:47.660 that show the handmaiden's tale is going to be imposed if we don't fight harder and that it's it's
00:29:52.920 just behind every corner it's right around every tree and normally it's just kind of silly because
00:29:57.720 it never gains any traction because anyone in the real world can see that you know trump is just isn't
00:30:02.460 like that he's not a theocrat but what this law does is it gives them something to point at
00:30:09.080 tangibly in the real world that actually feeds into their conspiracy theory about the christian
00:30:17.280 theocracy that is waiting in the wings to take over the country that's exactly why they love this
00:30:23.260 thing so much and why they're satiating over it okay let's get to one of our partners here
00:30:27.980 let's go to the wellness company uh when it comes to staying healthy on the go you can never be too
00:30:33.780 prepared whether you're a frequent traveler a remote worker an avid outdoorsman or literally anyone
00:30:38.280 with a pulse the wellness company's travel emergency kit is here to be your new best friend
00:30:42.660 uh if you don't have a pulse by the way you have bigger problems the wellness company's travel
00:30:46.660 emergency kit contains six prescription medications over-the-counter meds a comprehensive guidebook
00:30:51.620 and crucial medical supplies all carefully curated so you get to enjoy every moment of your trip
00:30:57.120 with a team of renowned medical professionals including dr peter mccullough and dr drew pinsky
00:31:02.480 he's great standing behind every kit you know that you're in trusted hands no matter where life
00:31:07.480 takes you don't leave anything to chance and head on over to twc.health.cj and order your travel
00:31:13.120 emergency food uh not food kit but your kit today that's twc.health.cj and use promo code cj for an
00:31:19.360 exclusive 10 off at checkout uh check it out your health and your journey matter travel safe travel
00:31:26.260 prepared kits are only available in america it is for a health conscious traveler um and you want to
00:31:32.120 make sure look traveling is amazing but also comes with challenges so check it out right now uh twc.health.cj
00:31:37.760 you get all the different medications that you might possibly need so check it out right now okay on next
00:31:45.120 topic guys next topic is uh so this is a video that's been seen uh last i checked about 13 million
00:31:53.040 times it's uh tucker carlson responding he's uh has a new video out about the uh the war in gaza
00:32:00.760 where he interviews a lutheran pastor i guess they have those in palestine uh but he interviews a
00:32:09.220 lutheran pastor about the situation for christians in the holy land uh to get a sense of the tone
00:32:16.280 how about we play uh number 94 in october a greek orthodox church in the gaza strip was hit by an
00:32:22.860 airstrike we're showing the video now the church is in ruins at least 17 people were killed that day
00:32:28.360 again that was hardly the first time that fighting in that region killed christians you'll remember
00:32:32.760 the church of the nativity in bethlehem almost 20 years ago where a clergyman was killed in the
00:32:39.160 church with american weapons and christian clergy in our country said nothing and you may be asking
00:32:45.160 yourself well wait a second if christian leaders won't stand up for the lives of christians why
00:32:49.060 have them in the first place and that's probably a good question so you would think that in congress
00:32:54.380 there where there are many self-professed christians somebody might be piping up on behalf
00:32:58.860 of uh their brethren in the holy land but no just the opposite in fact for example at a town hall event
00:33:06.280 last month michigan congressman tim walberg a former evangelical pastor said he would like to see
00:33:12.380 the region treated like hiroshima was treated watch this we shouldn't be spending a dime on the
00:33:17.100 mediterranean hybrid it should be like nakasagi and irishima get over quick the same the same should
00:33:27.180 be in ukraine if you watch this whole video it's about 42 minutes long but the tone of the video from
00:33:34.140 tucker who's been you know probably the most popular voice on the right for you know the pundit voice on the
00:33:40.380 right for five years now five six seven years now is it's very very critical of the israeli government
00:33:48.360 and essentially very sympathetic to the palestinian side he asks a lot of questions where you know his
00:33:55.560 you can just tell by tucker's tenor and such that he's very critical of you know the way christian
00:34:02.140 lawmakers in the united states uh support israel and you know their approach to the entire thing
00:34:08.180 so it obviously plays into what we've been discussing over the last few months that
00:34:12.140 there is this very clear shift happening on the right on how on the unity of the right support of
00:34:18.520 israel and and how they feel about it in in general and i guess it stood out to me as uh
00:34:24.100 a little bit jarring it's hard to imagine that we got to this point compared to just you know
00:34:29.440 three four years ago with all the discussion of them moving the embassy to jerusalem and all of that
00:34:34.380 and we have more clips from the interview yeah do we let's play another clip i haven't watched the
00:34:40.460 whole thing yet okay uh let's do uh 90. how free are christians to practice christianity in israel
00:34:50.120 we cannot deny that there are many freedoms in in in the state of israel yes uh but it's not
00:34:58.560 uh as free as people think do you know that evangelicals as churches are not officially
00:35:04.900 recognized in israel not recognized by the government by the way by the government of israel
00:35:11.800 evangelism is illegal in israel and uh wait i'm sorry i'm asking you to stop there what does that
00:35:18.580 mean evangelism is illegal in israel it's it's against the law to evangelize in israel yeah i i don't
00:35:25.840 really know what he means by that i mean i've been to churches in israel feel like i've evangelized
00:35:30.460 in israel yeah it's a complicated thing so this is what it caused a lot of obviously uh that's a very
00:35:37.100 that's a very broad statement i it is a very broad statement so what did it you will sometimes see it
00:35:42.800 said uh by people of a certain persuasion they will say christian missionary activity in israel
00:35:48.880 is illegal and this is not true you are allowed to convert to christianity in israel you are allowed to
00:35:55.500 promote christianity in israel now what is also true is uh one israel obviously unlike us has control
00:36:03.940 of its borders and there is a history of them being like they don't like to let in people that they
00:36:11.560 think are just going to be proselytizing in israel they find it annoying for people to do that and
00:36:18.120 a lot of you know a lot of activist groups in israel dislike it a few years ago there was a push
00:36:24.440 to uh ban christian missionary work in israel that law was retracted it got a lot of attention in the
00:36:31.180 united states so it didn't pass but that had that was introduced uh when he says that they're not
00:36:36.220 recognized i look into this and this is true in a technical sense israel sort of has denominations
00:36:42.520 that it officially recognizes uh as churches this matters a lot because for example marriages in israel
00:36:49.880 are handled through religious bodies they don't have civil marriage in israel so they recognize 10
00:36:56.700 christian churches in israel like catholic church greek orthodox armenian orthodox armenian catholic
00:37:02.760 a few others and they don't have an evangelical church that they recognize like that said there are
00:37:10.400 you are allowed to be an evangelical in israel and you are allowed to practice it in whatever manner
00:37:17.700 you wish but there he is it is true that it is not recognized the same way that other faith groups
00:37:24.080 are in israel and that's kind of what stands out in this interview is there's a mix of stuff that is
00:37:29.800 true with stuff that is exaggerated and i think can be maliciously reframed and often is by people who
00:37:37.540 dislike israel for a million other reasons yeah i mean but i i've been to evangelical churches yeah me
00:37:43.700 too israel it's the jerusalem church jerusalem baptist church uh not to mention you know the
00:37:48.540 church of the holy sepulcher so well and let's let's be honest israel knows who their allies are
00:37:52.740 in the states well well but let's just also what i don't like about that clip of i don't know that guy
00:37:58.080 that was saying if you're a 20 year old serious christian you've never been to israel watching that
00:38:02.460 clip you think israel is hostile to christians my personal experience is the opposite i got like they
00:38:08.140 embrace convoys and like well they know really well they know they know who their allies are in the
00:38:12.980 states they know that evangelicals are their number one what blake has said is also true though
00:38:17.020 is that there is a fear yeah that too much proselytizing well that there could be a major
00:38:22.180 come to jesus movement well they're jewish state they see themselves as a jewish state so they see
00:38:27.620 that as a threat and but you know torah observant bible believing jews old testament are some of the
00:38:33.480 easiest converts to christianity um and there is and i don't know you have to fact check me on this
00:38:39.820 but there is something called the forbidden verse which is isaiah 53 which is i don't know
00:38:45.400 if it's illegal but it's really not you're not supposed to share it very much which is like the
00:38:49.940 gateway yeah um to christianity because it is the most accurate what does it say it's uh you're by
00:38:55.000 his stress whoa whoa charlie come on you gotta you can't just leave us hanging man you were pierced by
00:39:00.140 your transgressions out of a root a root out of dry ground you came um it basically tells the entire
00:39:07.480 from incarnation to the passion to the ministry he grew up before the uh before him like a tender
00:39:13.500 shoot and like a root out of dry ground he had no beauty or majesty to attract us to him nothing in
00:39:18.840 his appearance that we should desire him he was despised and rejected by mankind a man of suffering
00:39:24.400 and familiar with pain like one whom people hide their faces he was despised and we held him in low
00:39:31.680 esteem surely he took up our pain and bore our sufferings yet we considered him punished by god
00:39:37.100 stricken by him and afflicted but he was pierced for our transgressions and he was crushed for our
00:39:42.200 iniquities the punishment that brought us peace was on him and by his wounds we are healed
00:39:47.120 and uh yeah let's go let's go let's go and it says there's a website called one israel.org
00:39:55.120 one for israel uh israel 53 the forbidden chapter in fact there's a youtube channel that i used to watch
00:40:01.060 of messianic jews that would walk around the streets of israel and approach jews and ask them
00:40:07.880 do you know about isaiah 53 and it's a very successful way to spread the gospel that you know
00:40:13.520 they they know this for sure no of course and so what what what blake is saying is true but it's also
00:40:18.220 this this guy that went on tucker's show it's a complete misrepresentation of the reality of israel
00:40:23.700 jack well well i'll just throw out two one one is a is a point and then a question for charlie um you
00:40:30.440 know and just in case there's anyone listening to us that that isn't aware of this um which i always
00:40:35.880 try to think of like the guy in the back who has no idea what about the subject material isaiah is not
00:40:40.620 part of what you would consider the christian bible isaiah is part of the old testament what christians
00:40:47.180 consider the new testament or the old testament it's all the christian bible but yeah i know you're
00:40:51.620 right old testament versus new testament but it's part of what jews would consider the christian
00:40:56.780 bible correct yeah correct is what i'm saying so but charlie this is what i wanted to ask you though
00:41:00.780 when you say you know torah believing jews are the most uh are some of the are most most likely
00:41:07.220 why is that right well it's why is that well it's because jesus is a fulfillment of all the old
00:41:12.880 testament prophecy and they're waiting for the messiah and many bible believing torah observant
00:41:18.280 tanakh understanding jews don't have actually have never read the new testament scriptures
00:41:22.700 and when they do i've i've actually been able the holy spirit led him to jesus but i've seen a jew
00:41:29.700 become a messianic christian i don't know if you ever have andrew it's an amazing thing i know i know
00:41:34.600 uh and when a bunch of messianic when they when they tell you the story when they first read
00:41:39.180 matthew or john which are the two best gospels right they start crying well i can't say best i know best
00:41:45.880 gospels for jews oh i see i see i was like i like them all but matthew is the jewish gospel
00:41:50.580 100 you're 100 right mark is not that um but guys this this whole this whole 53 it just keeps
00:41:57.600 going like pretty good like look at all of look at all these prophecies that it tucked it touched
00:42:02.580 he you know uh he was oppressed and afflicted yet he did not open his mouth like that's a prophecy
00:42:09.240 right there this was written like 1500 years before jesus yeah he was led by the lamb before the
00:42:14.420 slaughter um you know yet who of his generation protested um oh he was assigned a grave with the
00:42:22.860 wicked and with the rich in his death right uh was it nicodemus yeah i mean like there's so much
00:42:29.700 stuff here um and yet it was the lord's will to crush him and cause him to suffer and though the
00:42:35.440 lord makes his life an offering for sin uh there you go offering for sin exactly so isaiah 53 is like
00:42:42.420 the nuclear bomb chapter uh-huh yeah there's wounds we are healed is is literally i mean i don't know if
00:42:50.660 you could find any phrase that better sums up christianity the the actual uh miracle of the
00:42:57.040 resurrection the miracle of the atonement the miracle of calc all of it right that sentence right
00:43:01.840 there and it's found in isaiah people need to understand that so if i if i would have had this
00:43:06.620 guy on my show i would have asked him whatever his name is i would have said hey like you why
00:43:12.880 didn't you mention that bethlehem is largely controlled by the palestinian authority so this
00:43:18.720 was this was brought up a lot and i don't think it's the own a lot of people did because at least
00:43:24.780 in the interview with tucker he's not saying like oh we face a lot of oppression in our day-to-day
00:43:30.420 religious life in bethlehem with the implication that israel's behind that what he does talk about
00:43:36.300 is uh he talks about the difficulty in going to christian holy sites because obviously israel
00:43:43.260 again they control their borders so they control you know they have the barrier with west bank
00:43:47.640 there's not a lot of free movement across that barrier you need an individual permit to do it
00:43:53.220 uh so there's a lot of complaints about that that they can't go to east jerusalem easily because
00:43:57.920 israel's uh basically annexed that part of it um so he talks about stuff like that he talks about the
00:44:04.280 impact of the war he talks about yeah financial support for israel by christian churches and you
00:44:10.620 know the comparative in his view like lack of support for christian sites uh tucker actually
00:44:16.260 complains i don't think we have that as a clip but tucker complains in the interview about seeing i think
00:44:21.680 the church of the holy sepulcher and how shabby it is that he thinks a lot of the churches christian
00:44:26.660 churches in israel kind of look like dumps and that you know he's upset that christians don't seem
00:44:32.320 to fret about that in comparison to other things that they financially holy sepulcher is from the
00:44:38.500 300 a.d it's about a thousand years old but there's also it's 1700 years old but there's the current
00:44:46.880 building is about it and has nothing to do necessarily direct because of the government it's
00:44:52.920 actually because it's and i know this constant it used to be the temple of venus and he and so
00:44:58.380 the current building is about a thousand there's been a church there it's quite old but the issue
00:45:02.700 there the issue there is it's because it's joint it's basically joint controlled by a variety of
00:45:09.300 churches so the orthodox the roman catholics um it's and so so it shifts it shifts who's in control
00:45:15.280 of a certain time so basically and this is an issue with a number of the holy sites where yes it's under
00:45:20.960 um the israeli government but it's actually has more to do with an issue between the churches
00:45:26.620 people arguing over how it should be uh you know done who should pay for it all sorts of different
00:45:34.300 things you know not to mention the the various arguments between uh you know the catholics and
00:45:38.940 orthodox believe me you want you know you want to get into that but so it it really is a management
00:45:43.880 issue because it's shared jointly between uh these these organizations that have so much differences of
00:45:49.920 opinion i specifically asked that question when i was there it's not like no i agree like i wish that
00:45:55.100 it was in in better upkeep for sure i certainly agree with that but i don't know that you can lay
00:46:00.480 the blame for that specifically on like just the israeli government there's a whole ton of issues there
00:46:06.200 let me just say just because go ahead just because we said his name and uh we have the name of the guy
00:46:12.360 that tucker interviews is month or isaac and so i just wanted to get that out there because we have
00:46:16.820 we've always said we don't know his name but his month or isaac he's an evangelical lutheran pastor
00:46:21.940 so i think he grew up orthodox there's not really a lot of lutherans native to palestine
00:46:28.320 yeah i would have said how's religious liberty in jordan for christians like not great okay it's
00:46:35.880 fine i bet jordan's better there's always there's always this element this is what gets voted about it
00:46:41.280 you know christians in egypt there are millions of christians in egypt and the coptics they're not
00:46:46.600 treated well a harder time and more danger than christians do in israel they do not treat they're
00:46:51.460 not true so i want to just say this i had a lot of people text me about this really upset about
00:46:56.300 this interview really fired up about it a lot of pro-israel you know folks and my response is the
00:47:00.820 same is look you know where i like israel i've had a great time there but you guys have to understand
00:47:06.100 you're losing the american people right andrew and like i i'm trying to tell but i'm not getting
00:47:11.720 through to people when i say that and the israel strategy is kind of like we're white knuckling we
00:47:16.340 don't care i guess and it's using a lot of like coercive force is i think the way it feels like right
00:47:23.220 like the adl up to its own tricks and but now they you know they they feel like the conservatives
00:47:29.020 and the liberal jews are kind of bound together after october 7th but yeah i i agree i mean there's no
00:47:34.900 there's no getting around the fact that as you go from older to younger the support for israel
00:47:40.860 wanes right um i personally watched some of these clips i did not watch the full thing didn't have
00:47:47.380 time but i've watched a number of the clips now just before the show and a lot of the issues i bring
00:47:53.060 up i actually have a lot of sympathy for israel's perspective right if i was not a christian and
00:47:58.080 there was all these christians that wanted to come visit my whole the holy sites that were in my
00:48:01.960 land and i was the one jewish nation on planet earth i i'd keep a live eye on if they were trying
00:48:07.860 to convert everybody now as a christian i think it's pretty great like i hope a bunch of jews
00:48:12.360 become christians i think that'd be great but i i certainly understand their position of being
00:48:15.420 watchful of it um even the this this lutheran evangelical lutheran pastor you have to assume
00:48:22.620 everybody on that side of the border wants you dead that's that's on them and so yeah if you could
00:48:28.780 just fake being a christian and then you get you get through like imagine how many uh christians
00:48:33.900 would all of a sudden uh appear out of thin air on the jordan side right in the west bank so so i have
00:48:39.240 a lot of sympathy for uh for israel even as i'm i'm hearing this but charlie you're totally right
00:48:44.920 in general this is a larger cultural movement and um it makes me sad to your point blake i think a lot
00:48:53.800 of people are using other grievances they have against israel and they're attaching it to some of this
00:48:57.620 stuff whether or not it's you you could have a really reasonable conversation and understand where
00:49:01.580 israel's coming from they're attaching other grievances they're reading into it um what they
00:49:06.360 already what they already think about israel and i think it's more endemic of of the drift that we've
00:49:11.120 seen even on on some conservative in some conservative circles jack really quick then i gotta talk about
00:49:15.360 coffee jack really quick yeah yeah no i'll just throw out there that you know this this has been
00:49:20.040 one of those things where i think i think so in the social media era people are getting more
00:49:26.060 information and direct information from battlefields and from places that you know a lot of a lot of times
00:49:32.800 in the past they thought had been kind of settled but then all of a sudden you'll get something like
00:49:37.220 you know a guy like a congressman former congressman justin amash right so he's palestinian but he's i
00:49:44.280 believe coptic uh his foe so his family's christian and his family as far as i know was associated with
00:49:51.220 one of these churches that was hit in a strike that was caught in the crossfire and one of these
00:49:56.840 things he had someone who's like in his extended family was killed in this and so the power of that
00:50:01.660 kind of thing going out on social media is 10 times more powerful than anything anyone has ever
00:50:07.640 considered before from this area because usually they just hear like oh you know israel good
00:50:12.000 palestinians bad and so i think the impact of that to what you guys are saying is something that
00:50:17.920 completely hasn't been addressed and there's so many blanket you know throwing out labels there
00:50:22.900 of oh you're anti-semitic if you criticize this oh you're anti-semitic if you bring this up and it's
00:50:27.460 like well wait you know people didn't even know that there were christians in gaza to begin with and
00:50:32.780 i think that's where the issue comes it's been so detrimental i will say a lot of the overreaction
00:50:37.940 like you know charlie you've been called anti-semitic in this which is which if you know charlie
00:50:43.800 i've been called everything for seven i've been working with charlie for i guess seven years now
00:50:47.800 i you are the most you send 150 kids to israel every year like i honor the shabbat yeah i read
00:50:54.440 the torah in hebrew you send out like all our campus uh campuses through turning point usa have
00:50:59.860 activism kids that are anyways the crazy thing is the fact that they would dare serious people
00:51:05.940 on the internet or at least formally considered serious people let me go even further there was
00:51:09.680 an article the washington times that said i must be displaced as ceo of turning point usa yeah i'm
00:51:14.740 not kidding i remember i'm a threat to jury around the world the damage that this this has done now i
00:51:23.820 i want to at least extend an olive branch that october 7th is extremely uh disruptive i've been
00:51:31.240 resolutely pro-israel despite the names they're calling me but some of the weird overreaction and
00:51:36.100 stuff that we've all observed if you're not jewish i i think we we have to you know try our best to
00:51:42.720 say listen what they went through was existential to them and so there are going to be reactions that
00:51:46.940 don't necessarily make logical sense they're only emotional so i'm trying to give room for that but
00:51:52.580 what the fact that somebody like charlie kirk could be called an anti-semite it it jack to your point
00:51:59.000 i'm just saying like this has been so detrimental to their ability to consolidate support in
00:52:06.160 traditional places where they've had it i've said this story publicly and and and andrew you've you
00:52:11.020 just kind of mentioned and um you know it was when you talk about you know sending kids to israel
00:52:18.300 um charlie came to me a couple years back and said hey we're doing this israel trip um you know do you
00:52:24.380 want to go and i said you know i'd love to but as a matter of fact charlie i would love if i could get
00:52:29.180 my family to come along charlie said don't even worry about it they'll all be taken care of and
00:52:33.980 sent my entire family to go and visit the holy land it was it was the trip of our lives my family
00:52:39.520 still talks about it and you know it was something where he didn't even ask for anything in in return
00:52:45.060 well thank you that touches me jack and that i mean to send people to holy land is one of the
00:52:50.220 greatest things i believe we can do i just want to read this quote uh in addition to that this guy
00:52:54.760 jeffrey shapiro writes mr kirk should resign or be removed as head of turning point usa or the right
00:53:02.100 will and should suffer the consequences of its inaction jeffrey scott shapiro is a former washington
00:53:08.100 prosecutor who served on the board of advisors and he literally was a former doj prosecutor and he's
00:53:13.780 like pseudo threatening me in this washington times piece remember the remember the reason for
00:53:19.020 them calling you an anti-semi charlie it's because you asked why the intelligence failed
00:53:24.160 in the first place you can't do that but like that's it that's it and this is i made an astute
00:53:29.200 observation we still don't have an answer to that no remember they ended up firing somebody
00:53:33.100 two weeks we have like tons of articles that show that they did have like a name for the potential
00:53:38.700 breaking of the wall they didn't take it seriously we're not we're not ascribing new york times
00:53:42.780 there was an analyst there was an analyst we're not ascribing motivations or intentions we're
00:53:47.320 analyzing a fact pattern that doesn't click yeah yeah if you're upset at the u.s government for
00:53:54.120 letting 9-11 happen does that make you anti-american do you know who's you know who said he loved what
00:53:59.040 i said dennis prager he said you he said charlie you were spot on with what you said yeah well loved
00:54:04.380 i think my best line the best line from this washington times piece i just found it some might
00:54:09.980 say mr kirk's comments demonstrate ignorance but he may just lack a conscience or
00:54:15.980 yes it's so ridiculous like in retrospect but i when when pro-israel people say why are we losing
00:54:25.540 the debate i'm like because jeffrey scott shapiro went out and attacked i mean correct me if i'm wrong
00:54:32.380 jack out of all the major conservative christian social media influencers i think i'm one of the
00:54:38.060 largest pro-israel voices out there that's non-jewish yeah let's here's another ben dominich
00:54:42.980 tweeted if charlie kirk remains the head of tp usa the right has an anti-semite problem that will
00:54:51.600 follow them into the coming elections what a dumb person what a an absolute idiot he's either paid
00:55:01.300 or he's mentally like unfit to drive a automobile like that's how like insanely dumb that person who
00:55:09.760 you just mentioned is like i i am so viscerally annoyed by that person all right oh so we have
00:55:16.280 two options here we could approach this we have the um only fans influencer going christian or we have
00:55:23.260 who's responsible for breaking marriage in response to your discussion i kind of asked me
00:55:27.680 all righty all righty so i'll set the stage on this last week you charlie kirk the anti-semite
00:55:35.740 who's going to destroy us all in the elections had some comments on marriage women contacting you
00:55:42.240 wanting to find husbands and you say you know like uh you might have waited too long yeah can we
00:55:50.140 clarify something one of the things that bothered me about this story was charlie's the direct quote
00:55:55.260 and sorry if you at the audience maybe you need to be caught up jack fill in the gaps where i missed
00:55:59.880 this you're good at that but charlie was talking at a church and he asked about this and he said
00:56:05.580 the direct quote was if you wait to get married until you're in your 30s if to the females you are
00:56:12.840 quote less attractive in the dating pool you did not say they were less attractive there's many many
00:56:19.240 women in their 30s that are absolutely beautiful okay that's not what you were saying you're saying
00:56:23.500 there there is a smaller pool there's less options there it they're they're also for men that want to
00:56:31.500 have kids you know that kind of thing i mean i'm not saying it was the most delicate framing of the
00:56:37.120 that sentence but just just to be you know very precise about that you were not calling people ugly
00:56:43.020 okay no i wasn't no i was saying that again what you said it fine so i don't need to yeah go ahead
00:56:47.380 all right go ahead blake i just had to yeah this of course i'm fired up still from the last thing
00:56:52.600 this started you know charlie's you know once a month instance of being like the number one
00:56:56.760 conversation driver in america and then this uh this provoked a response an article that i read and
00:57:03.060 then we had a bit of discussion uh before the show uh so there's a writer scott greer we've talked
00:57:08.860 about the greer head pledge before like should we not watch rap or get or listen to rap or get
00:57:13.960 tattoos or watch the nfl all of that uh but he had an article where he titled it stop blaming men
00:57:20.240 for the marriage crisis uh and i'm gonna read a quote from it which i think you guys can put on
00:57:25.120 screen he says charlie kirk upset a lot of women last week in a discussion on unmarried women
00:57:30.620 preferring democrats he said ladies in their 30s are this is greer's wording past their prime and
00:57:36.540 struggle to find a husband this is obviously true but impolite to say her statement naturally inspired
00:57:43.400 outrage among liberals as well as among conservatives that shouldn't surprise anyone
00:57:48.040 kirk's opinion runs counter to the prevailing conservative narrative about the decline of
00:57:53.540 marriage conservatives say that it's men's fault and we need to do more to shame males into stepping
00:57:59.880 up but this male focused answer isn't correct i won't read the whole article but what he gets into
00:58:05.780 is he argues he cites uh senator josh holly who we've talked to quite a bit where you know you have this
00:58:11.560 very male focused thing that men need to uh get better jobs stop doing you know stop playing video
00:58:18.340 games stop watching porn stop doing all these destructive things get improve and then marry women
00:58:24.840 have families and what he argues is the reason marriage is in decline is mostly women driven that
00:58:31.360 they are encouraged to focus on their careers to delay looking for a husband and then they're fed a
00:58:39.320 bunch of excuses afterwards that like you know it's the entire world that's wrong you didn't screw up
00:58:43.720 if you wait too long and you're in your 30s and you're not able to get married and so our debate
00:58:48.960 which we're going to have here is who broke marriage men or women it has to be all one or all the other
00:58:54.620 it can't be that both of them have some responsibility i mean think it's both i think what greer is
00:59:00.140 pinpointing what i was saying is that men get all the blame and you're not even allowed to mention
00:59:05.440 anything that women could do differently and i think that's totally fair is that are there decisions
00:59:10.560 and cultural norms and habits that women specifically women in their 20s are doing that
00:59:16.000 make marriage rates go down and you know make it less likely to for families to be well i think that
00:59:21.820 was evident in the reaction to that clip which you know it was was how was the reaction andrew i don't
00:59:28.880 it was basically i mean actually i will say plenty of people a ton of people i would actually say what
00:59:35.740 i was looking at more people uh were defending it but there was a couple of loud voices that were
00:59:40.780 getting upset about it plus there was the whole birth control piece of it which i think is like you
00:59:45.940 know it's like a sacred cow for for especially nothing i said was incorrect unfactual no i mean there's
00:59:51.580 and there's a ton of there's a ton of uh evidence behind that i think a lot of people just think that
00:59:56.360 women should be the one that are talking about and it's like well you know how do you expect us
01:00:01.000 a to know that that's the rule and b uh why can't we be supportive i have a platform i'm talking about
01:00:07.520 a topic anything where they say only men or only women can talk about it is like yes ridiculous
01:00:13.040 unless it's like a sensory phenomenon like what does it feel like to give birth okay men shouldn't
01:00:18.120 weigh in on i of course yeah that i agree any moral issue any societal issue like everyone so i i've
01:00:24.540 not really read too much of scott greer's stuff um i did read this before the before the show i i like
01:00:31.420 you know i first of all let me say i actually endorse senator holly like i think men respond well
01:00:38.740 to being called up um i think you have to call men up called out and called out called but but like
01:00:45.120 called higher right um and to to be better i know that the the biggest leaps and improvements i've made
01:00:50.880 in my life is when i encounter somebody that challenges me to do more to be better to be
01:00:55.840 stronger um and so i think that's just a part of the male uh experience but i do think it is weird
01:01:05.580 and he did call this out that that it's basically we've created a culture especially on the right
01:01:10.320 where it's okay to call men out we could belittle men all we want and and uh but you can't do that
01:01:15.080 with women and i think that part of that might just be because women receive criticism differently
01:01:21.240 they're emotionally there's a different process that they tend to go through but it's a fair critique
01:01:27.000 of the whole thing because what we're essentially doing if you look at pop culture and hollywood jack i
01:01:31.400 i know you will agree with me on this a lot of people pointed out that like fathers in hollywood
01:01:37.640 over the years have become dumber and like basically just shallow uh uh husks of the previous great
01:01:46.940 fathers from the 50s and 60s right now we have homer simpson right so what the conservative movement
01:01:51.680 essentially doing is we're just mimicking our uh the larger culture that we're trying to impact or at
01:01:57.100 least ostensibly trying to impact and we're just putting all the blame at the at the men and i think
01:02:02.840 that's ultimately why that clip you know created a conversation is because you broke that rule you
01:02:09.080 you you you put some of the blame at yes at women and and saying you should prioritize marriage more
01:02:16.020 than your career and don't take birth control if it's going to delay those really really important
01:02:21.120 life decisions and your future happiness go ahead sorry jack no no i actually so like i agree and
01:02:27.420 disagree with you right in and not that i disagree with anything that you say i just mean in terms of
01:02:32.460 yes it's true that women do need to uphold their fair share of this and they need to take their fair
01:02:40.600 share of lumps the same way that men have taken their fair share of lumps and how many shows have we
01:02:45.320 done talking about the decline of masculinity in america i think it's probably if you went through
01:02:50.320 like thought crime topics it's probably our our our number one or at least top five but those don't go
01:02:56.260 viral jack why don't they go viral yeah funny enough but the minute you but here's what i will say
01:03:01.700 though the other piece of this is that the reason and this kind of answers charlie's question the
01:03:06.300 reason that you got so much flack for those comments specifically charlie even though there are lots of
01:03:12.380 women who agree 100 with what you said is that what you're really seeing is a power play you're seeing
01:03:19.360 a power play whereby in these comments are valid if women make them if these are choices that women
01:03:27.340 make because women are the ones that are allowed to make decisions men are only allowed to affirm the
01:03:36.120 decisions of the women that have been made this is where that is society this is where people missed
01:03:41.160 even greater who i was talking to parents i was saying parents do not allow your daughters
01:03:47.820 to get on this so i'm not allowed to give advice to parents yeah i mean that's specifically christian
01:03:53.580 parents in which by the way or you know speaking as a catholic um not exactly a radical position to
01:04:00.060 take for you know not at all christians to be against birth control it's a pretty no pretty standard
01:04:04.800 topic and i would say that most people that are on birth control they don't know all the risks they
01:04:08.920 don't know all of the costs associated so yeah i mean it's it's on both but the the way the dating
01:04:14.440 conversation is presented especially when i talk to young women i say are you happy with the pool of
01:04:21.140 young men out there oh no they're terrible they're self-interested they have no ambition
01:04:25.660 i say are you guys doing everything perfectly they say well we have our act together and you know
01:04:29.720 we're not to blame for this there's an incredible amount of pride you know that young ladies have
01:04:34.140 well i'm surprised that they're that that's been your experience i have never asked that question
01:04:38.780 so i i'm going off of your your take i find that i mean that's a general it's just but i
01:04:43.500 where maybe i'm wrong there's a major manosphere self-improvement
01:04:49.580 oh man it's a whole industry is there a female sphere self-improvement industry about it i just
01:04:55.320 don't think it's as developed yet i don't think it's nascent it exists and some of it's really
01:04:59.940 weird like you can find sort of like you know there's like a subreddit kind of yeah there's a
01:05:05.600 subreddit called female dating strategy and it's extremely mentally ill if you read it so i would
01:05:11.040 i would not recommend checking it out and it has to mature strategy but it's an interesting
01:05:16.860 question you know like one thing the article i mentioned earlier highlights is another article
01:05:22.400 uh by brad wilcox and it's title from the institute for family studies and it's titled where have all
01:05:28.820 the good men gone and that's kind of that's often the framing that is popular if people want to blame
01:05:35.660 men for the decline in marriage that men are in decline good men are not available and
01:05:41.020 i there's some merit to this you know if you go to a college campus most of the students at most
01:05:49.620 campuses now are women most of the people who finish are going to be women the number of men the
01:05:55.320 number of people who are falling into like disastrous lives where they're not really fit to
01:06:00.740 marry anyone that's going to be more men than women they're the ones who live at home don't have
01:06:06.940 any job aren't an education or are doing nothing with their lives are just addicted to games or porn
01:06:12.980 or or nothing in particular and i do think that fixing that problem i lean towards it being a male
01:06:19.960 thing just in that i think women naturally do follow men and look towards men and so if men are a disaster
01:06:26.580 a lot of things flow out of that and if you are making men a higher quality group of people across the
01:06:32.980 board that will spread throughout society but i could be wrong in that i agree easily flip it the
01:06:40.320 other way if i believe i'm sorry sorry but go ahead if women were more you know if you had a social
01:06:46.280 change of women more concertedly encouraging like traditional morality don't sleep with men as often
01:06:53.440 and you know kind of shun people who do it too easily then that would also encourage marriage that
01:06:59.440 would encourage commitment what you very much have is you have the consequence of high individualism
01:07:04.940 and basically anarchy in terms of personal decision making and so no one has held to account for bad
01:07:11.820 behavior basically and that's going to encourage lots of bad behavior and i i agree with you i believe
01:07:19.000 that the most direct route from fixing this solution is to create higher quality men i do i actually do
01:07:24.920 because in in in some respects the whole debate that was sparked was a tacit tacit acknowledgement
01:07:32.380 that men hold it a an amount an immense immense amount of sway yeah so because it was all sort of
01:07:39.080 like why are the men hijacking this to conversate well okay well because it was an acknowledgement that
01:07:44.100 that power exists so i do believe that if men became become high quality become worth following
01:07:50.500 endeavor to be men worthy of leading uh a family and uh being uh in a marriage relationship obviously
01:07:58.960 that that women will will follow suit and then you know but i also do think as somebody who's married
01:08:04.620 to a woman that is a conservative woman and she celebrates my masculinity that's an important part
01:08:10.320 of this discussion women need to obviously need to give space for men to be men and it and i don't
01:08:17.040 think i don't think that uh exists in enough measure in our current culture i've won yeah go
01:08:23.280 ahead super quick super super quick point um men have to be able to say no men have to be able to be
01:08:29.540 in a relationship with a woman and say no uh whoever came up with that phrase happy wife happy life
01:08:34.520 is um an idiot and men need to stop believing that that is the only thing and the most masculine word
01:08:39.960 in the english language is the word no uh men being able to say no to women may be the one thing that
01:08:45.600 saves western society i mean happy wife happy it i i agree with you but it's totally it's totally
01:08:52.960 fine to like use that as a little bit of a thing it's okay jack are you saying it's really unhappy
01:09:00.300 wife happy wife unhappy wife happy life yeah that's that that would be the character i i don't think i can
01:09:10.040 agree with that as a married man here but because the reason no the reason is because people take that to
01:09:14.220 to mean do whatever your wife says at all times never push back never stand up for yourself always
01:09:19.160 be a pushover for whatever she wants to say yes to which is wrong and so on its face completely
01:09:24.780 sayings but this is the issue yeah that it makes men like oh whatever you want honey bear yeah i agree
01:09:30.540 with you on that i do i do all right everybody gotta run thanks so much email us freedom at charliekirk.com
01:09:35.660 talk to you soon
01:10:02.800 Thank you.