TRUMP ASSASSIN ATTEMPED TO OBTAIN ANTI-AIRCRAFT MISSILES FROM UKRAINE TO SHOOT DOWN TRUMP FORCE ONE
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
167.68195
Summary
On today's show, Jack Posobiec talks about a new piece of evidence in the case of the September 15th, 2024 assassination attempt on President Donald J. Trump, and what we now know about the man behind it.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
I want to take a second to remind you to sign up for the Poso Daily Brief.
00:00:06.760
It'll be one email that's sent to you every day.
00:00:08.660
You can stop the endless scrolling, trying to find out what's going on in your world.
00:00:11.720
We will have this delivered directly to you totally for free.
00:00:30.000
This is what happens when the fourth turning meets fifth generation warfare.
00:00:39.760
A commentator, international social media sensation, and former Navy intelligence veteran.
00:00:46.380
This is Human Events with your host, Jack Posobiec.
00:00:50.500
There's a major meeting going on between us and Iran, and that'll take place on Saturday,
00:00:58.220
And if diplomacy fails, is the United States under your leadership ready to take military
00:01:03.840
action to destroy the Iranian nuclear program and remove this threat?
00:01:08.640
I think if the talks aren't successful with Iran, I think Iran is going to be in great danger.
00:01:17.800
And I hate to say it, great danger, because they can't have a nuclear weapon.
00:01:22.400
U.S. stock futures are looking much better this morning, following yesterday's close,
00:01:28.800
And global markets appear to be seeing a rebound today.
00:01:31.600
And China is pushing back against President Trump's threat to impose 50 percent tariffs.
00:01:38.220
The foreign ministry spokesperson said today, quote,
00:01:40.760
resorting to pressure, threats, and blackmail is not the right way to engage with China.
00:01:45.940
U.S. Supreme Court has handed President Trump a victory, letting him and his administration
00:01:51.060
use the 1798 law that historically has been employed only in wartime to swiftly deport alleged Venezuelan
00:01:58.680
gang members as part of the Republican president's hardline approach to immigration.
00:02:02.860
This is a landmark victory for the rule of law.
00:02:06.360
And this is what we've been arguing on behalf of President Trump from day one.
00:02:10.560
These are enemies of our state, of our country, and they should be deported.
00:02:16.060
I think there was this concern among some folks that Donald Trump would come in for a second term
00:02:26.520
Well, ladies and gentlemen, welcome aboard today's edition of Human Events Daily here live,
00:02:34.480
In a filing last night in court down in the Federal District of Florida,
00:02:39.560
Ryan Wesley Ralph, the individual who was involved in the second assassination attempt
00:02:45.300
on President Trump, was given a huge new piece of information.
00:02:51.260
We've got now more evidence on his background, his dealings, and what exactly he was up to
00:02:56.640
down there in the weeks and days prior to the assassination attempt on President Trump.
00:03:01.840
Now, remember, this is the September 15th assassination attempt,
00:03:05.460
not the Butler, Pennsylvania assassination attempt.
00:03:11.580
Tried to kill Trump on his golf course, but he was stopped.
00:03:18.920
They missed or perhaps were deflected by this rudimentary body armor that he had built up
00:03:24.140
And then he vanishes only later to be apprehended.
00:03:28.800
What we do know about him was that he extensive ties and travel within the country of Ukraine
00:03:34.060
and, in fact, participated in the Ukrainian International Volunteer Force.
00:03:40.880
He was attempting to recruit individuals potentially from Afghanistan and other parts of the world,
00:03:46.960
even Taiwan at one point he talked about, to bring them to the battlefield in Ukraine.
00:03:50.920
We now know, and this is the biggest bombshell, that he attempted to contact a member of the
00:03:58.620
Ukrainian military or someone associated with the Ukrainian military to purchase rocket-propelled grenades,
00:04:06.380
RPGs, or Stinger missiles known as an anti-aircraft missile.
00:04:14.420
Well, this time frame was back in August of 2024.
00:04:18.740
What else did we hear going on in the fall, late summer and fall of 2024?
00:04:24.780
We also heard those scares about President Trump's aircraft, Trump Force One.
00:04:30.300
Members of Trump's campaign team were even using decoy planes during the campaign because
00:04:35.820
they were worried about what anti-aircraft missiles.
00:04:40.400
All of this leads to more questions as to who exactly was it that Ralph was talking to?
00:04:47.460
Who exactly was it that either didn't report this or put it back forward?
00:04:52.380
And what did the U.S. government know prior to the assassination attempt on September 15th,
00:05:01.300
if this information was out there as early as August?
00:05:09.260
And we'll be right back here on Real America's Voice.
00:05:25.980
All right, Jack Posobiec, here we are back live.
00:05:32.520
I also want to bring in the third hour of the Charlie Kirk program on the Salem Radio Network.
00:05:40.560
Folks, did you know that over 80% of the U.S. meat industry is controlled by just four companies,
00:05:45.840
but that China controls the largest portion of the U.S. meat industry?
00:05:49.580
Americans want to know where their food comes from.
00:05:51.700
And we don't want to be reliant on any foreign country for the food that we put on our family's table.
00:05:56.760
That's exactly what Trump's tariff policy is all about,
00:05:59.580
bringing businesses back to Americans and American farms all across the country.
00:06:04.040
So that's why Human Events has partnered with Moink.
00:06:08.700
Moink's meat comes from animals raised outdoors,
00:06:12.920
You pick the meat you want, and it's delivered right to your door.
00:06:16.820
Moink's farmers are given an honest day's pay for an honest day's work.
00:06:20.760
And they deliver exactly what you want at prices you can actually afford.
00:06:24.300
Born, raised, and harvested right here in the United States of America.
00:06:28.280
Support American Family Farms and join the Moink movement today at moinkbox.com slash poso right now.
00:06:36.900
These are the best wings you will ever taste for free, but for a limited time.
00:06:48.120
Want to invite on now, we're very excited to have on the program,
00:06:52.620
Oren Kass, the chief economist at American Compass.
00:07:01.320
Now, you've been going viral lately, but you're on The Daily Show.
00:07:07.000
This tariff policy that's been rolled out by President Trump, it's been something that
00:07:10.840
has a lot of people sort of in a tailspin because I don't really think that people are
00:07:15.420
understanding it from the perspective of the economy.
00:07:21.220
He's fighting on behalf of workers, but perhaps he's misguided.
00:07:26.320
What is your response and what has your view been of the policy as it's rolled out?
00:07:30.420
Well, I start with the definition of the problem because I think one of the most important things
00:07:37.140
that President Trump has brought to all sorts of areas in American politics is focusing on
00:07:42.400
things that are really wrong in this country that have gone unaddressed for so much time.
00:07:49.280
For the last 30 years, we've had economists and politicians saying,
00:07:54.800
We just need to embrace China and promising that that was going to create more good American
00:07:58.980
jobs, promising that was going to be good for American industry.
00:08:14.200
And I think President Trump has done an incredible service in saying, this cannot go on.
00:08:19.060
We really need to change how the international economic system works.
00:08:23.360
We need to make sure it actually works for the United States.
00:08:26.520
And as importantly, something most politicians won't do, he's saying, look, this and this
00:08:32.720
It is going to require some sacrifice in the short run to dig out of this hole.
00:08:39.000
And so I think having an administration willing to push in that direction is incredibly important.
00:08:47.800
And I think, you know, I have some concerns about some of the details.
00:08:50.500
We can talk about, you know, what is exactly the right way to go after this.
00:08:54.220
But it is just incredibly important that we finally are going after it.
00:08:58.460
And so, right, the idea being that is there's a lot of people who have been saying that the
00:09:05.180
status quo, that the concerns of so much of America, it doesn't really matter, that everything's
00:09:09.860
certainly fine, that people are just, you know, everything is sunshine and roses.
00:09:13.460
But in reality, the status quo does have these massive structural issues to it.
00:09:18.220
And like it or lump it, what President Trump is at least attempting to do is address these
00:09:24.260
types of problems that have been going on for far too long.
00:09:27.180
Again, the hollowing out of middle America, this massive overspending, monetary policy where
00:09:32.240
it's, you know, it's been go to the Fed whenever there's an issue, inject that liquidity into
00:09:37.000
And at some point, this was always going to come to a halt.
00:09:40.560
At some point, this debt was going to have to be paid.
00:09:42.640
And this is the way that President Trump and his team have decided to come together and
00:09:49.100
Whereas the previous administration, of course, were, you know, sitting there and lying to
00:09:52.820
you blue in the face, telling you that nothing was wrong.
00:09:57.380
And you see that in these sort of fights, you know, certainly among economists, there are
00:10:01.920
so many people who will just say, well, look at, you know, look at gross domestic product,
00:10:15.120
They really do think that the sort of definition of flourishing is just how much stuff you have.
00:10:22.600
I don't think we should be living in log cabins in the woods.
00:10:25.260
But I do think we have to think a lot harder about some of these trade-offs and recognize
00:10:29.340
that there's more to life than just as much cheap stuff as you can get from China.
00:10:34.500
Whether or not there are good jobs in communities across the country that allow people to support
00:10:39.180
families, whether or not we can make the things we need in this country to defend ourselves,
00:10:44.060
to be resilient in the case of some sort of global crisis.
00:10:50.700
And thank goodness we, you know, we will hopefully start to get some of it back.
00:10:56.820
And so this is something where, oh, by the way, I'm told that we actually have the clip.
00:11:03.280
Guys, let's play for the audience the clip of you explaining this to Jon Stewart on The Daily Show.
00:11:10.600
If we think this sort of liberal world order system, first of all, even if it was serving the U.S. well at one point,
00:11:20.400
Second of all, to some extent, may just be going away anyway.
00:11:25.840
The U.S. cannot be a unipolar hegemon like it was when the Cold War ended.
00:11:31.200
So if we accept that things are going to change, we should have a perspective on what we want to follow.
00:11:35.840
And, you know, something that I've been writing about a lot is trying to interpret and decipher what that might look like.
00:11:44.600
They have not been as clear about it as we should want them to be.
00:11:47.780
What I think we should want and what, like I said, folks in the administration like a Marco Rubio or a Scott Besant,
00:11:55.280
who I think do write and speak thoughtfully about it, have pointed toward,
00:11:59.440
is the idea that we absolutely want a strong economic and security alliance.
00:12:04.500
It's not going to be the whole world because China is going to have its own sphere as well.
00:12:09.600
But what we want to have within our sphere is a few things that in the past the U.S. didn't necessarily ask for.
00:12:15.120
We're going to want balanced trade, where in the past we were happy to let the manufacturing go elsewhere.
00:12:20.860
We're going to want others to essentially own their own defense burdens.
00:12:25.020
That doesn't mean we're not partnering and working together,
00:12:27.640
but that everybody takes primary responsibility for their own defense.
00:12:31.960
And these are, again, just some of the things that you've been talking about here on the program,
00:12:38.320
laying it out, this idea that it feels to me almost like it's sort of like those old studies that you read
00:12:44.420
about imperial overstretch of the Roman Empire or something like that,
00:12:49.220
whereas to say we're paying for the defense of so many areas that are far beyond the core of our heartland
00:12:55.460
that it's actually the heartland itself that is paying the price as we overextend ourselves.
00:13:01.300
Does that kind of get to what you're talking about?
00:13:04.100
Yeah, that's a great way of putting it because this is the sort of imperial plan that the U.S. has pursued.
00:13:10.880
You know, after the end of World War II and then even more so after the end of the Cold War,
00:13:17.880
I mean, you know, in the 1990s, it was the U.S.'s world.
00:13:23.060
And the calculation that we made was we benefited from that.
00:13:27.540
And that if we had to pay more for other people's defense,
00:13:30.880
but it meant that we were the only incredibly powerful military, that was a good trade.
00:13:35.880
If we had to let manufacturing go to other countries, but as a result, they were friendlier to us,
00:13:42.500
as a result, they sort of kept peace and a friendly economic environment, then that was a good trade.
00:13:49.800
And it's an interesting question whether it was even a good trade back then.
00:13:54.680
But the reality is that it is certainly not a good trade now,
00:13:58.340
that the costs have really built up for the United States, the benefits have really gone down,
00:14:03.020
and that as China rises in the world, even if we liked that world, we just can't have it anymore.
00:14:11.200
And sometimes it takes some policies that cause disruption to move in response to that,
00:14:18.340
to not just wait until you're overtaken by events,
00:14:21.120
but to actually take the initiative in moving toward the new system that would benefit our country.
00:14:27.360
That would actually benefit the people who live here, perhaps at the expense,
00:14:31.620
or at least at the deference of those who can maybe shoulder their own burden.
00:14:37.640
We're discussing these issues with him, the tariffs.
00:14:40.080
He is the chief economist over at American Compass.
00:14:43.700
We'll be right back for more on his new column that's just out today.
00:14:48.380
You guys got to go read it and go follow Oren at OrenKass at X.com.
00:15:22.400
This is Human Events Daily, welcoming back in the Salem Radio Network,
00:15:25.720
Hour 3 of the Charlie Kirk Program, as well as Real America's Voice.
00:15:29.120
We're talking with Oren Kass, chief economist at American Compass,
00:15:33.120
as well as the writer of the newsletter, Understanding America.
00:15:36.520
He is out today with a brand new column that says,
00:15:43.920
And so, Oren, in the piece that you go through, you know,
00:15:47.400
walk us through it a little bit, because I think what's interesting is
00:15:50.160
you describe Liberation Day almost like D-Day in the sense that you get the
00:15:54.800
shock and awe, but also the understanding that D-Day was merely day one of a
00:16:01.840
Yeah, we've really been talking, you know, so far about the idea here.
00:16:06.560
You know, what's really wrong, why we need to change course,
00:16:09.400
and the importance of having an administration and a president that are actually,
00:16:14.440
you know, see the problem and are prepared to do something about it.
00:16:17.920
I think that being said, there's a lot of fair criticism of some of the details of
00:16:22.100
what they're doing, particularly because if you're going to do this kind of move that,
00:16:28.280
you know, does have a lot of costs before you get the benefits,
00:16:32.040
it's really important to try to keep those costs as low as possible
00:16:35.400
and make sure you get those benefits as high as possible.
00:16:38.900
And so what I talk about in the piece is just a few places where I think there's
00:16:45.420
One of the most important is just the idea of phasing in some of these tariffs.
00:16:50.620
We have, especially with all these countries that we have been trading,
00:16:54.300
you know, in ways that really support their manufacturing,
00:16:57.640
that's what we've been doing for the last 50 years.
00:16:59.520
And it's entirely fair to say, hey, we actually would like to make a change.
00:17:05.320
I think it's a lot harder to just say, and you face a very large tariff starting today.
00:17:14.420
That creates a lot of cost, a lot faster than they could possibly do anything.
00:17:19.580
So one thing that I suggest is, look, especially all the countries that have clearly come forward
00:17:23.540
and say, yes, we understand things need to change.
00:17:28.040
It would make a lot more sense to say, okay, we have a six month period here to negotiate.
00:17:32.940
If we are not happy with the offers on the table,
00:17:35.700
then these tariffs start to go into effect six months from now.
00:17:39.180
And if over the six months after that, you don't get where you need to be,
00:17:45.120
And that would both give a chance to make progress without cost.
00:17:48.660
And it would give all of the businesses that have built up these supply chains,
00:17:56.400
We want them to start investing in America and we want them to start today.
00:18:00.140
But starting an investment in America today doesn't mean your factory starts running today.
00:18:04.440
We do need to account, I think, for the fact that there is going to be a transition period here.
00:18:11.540
Now, I wanted to key in as well on your section on China,
00:18:14.520
because you have an interesting idea, sort of a three step plan for the tariffs on China,
00:18:20.520
but ultimately would culminate in just a real disentanglement of the U.S. and Chinese economies.
00:18:27.920
And ultimately, with the revocation of China's permanent national,
00:18:33.020
permanent normal trade relations status and even most favored nation,
00:18:36.460
which is something that it's really the backbone of all of globalism.
00:18:42.060
I think this is one of the most achievable things.
00:18:45.720
You know, the original sin in a sense of globalization was when we granted China PNTR status in 2000, 2001 time.
00:18:54.500
That's what allowed them to join the WTO and opened up the floodgates of offshoring.
00:19:01.940
We should recognize that China is an adversary.
00:19:04.540
It is not a market economy and we should not have free trade with it.
00:19:08.520
And this is a surprisingly, you know, really an idea that has a surprising consensus.
00:19:13.700
It is a bipartisan recommendation of the House Committee on the Communist Party of China.
00:19:19.720
It is a bipartisan recommendation of the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission.
00:19:25.300
And there is already bipartisan legislation in Congress to do this.
00:19:30.160
And by the way, one of the co-sponsors of it was Marco Rubio, who is now the Secretary of State.
00:19:35.180
So if you were to embrace that approach, first of all, you could go through Congress, which would make it permanent, right?
00:19:41.620
If we actually change this stuff in the law, everyone will know we mean it.
00:19:47.520
Whereas I think one challenge with just doing it with action from the president is people are always going to wonder,
00:19:52.960
well, you know, what if he changes his mind tomorrow?
00:19:56.900
And then the second thing I think is that legislation that they have has this very thoughtful sort of phased-in approach where they say,
00:20:04.060
look, we want to get, you know, really all the way up to 100% tariff.
00:20:07.580
What Trump is now threatening for China basically is in the legislation.
00:20:11.980
We want to be at 100% for what we consider critical goods.
00:20:16.460
And that would effectively cut off imports of those goods.
00:20:20.940
But what it does is it has a schedule of how to go there over five years.
00:20:25.540
And if we were to pass that law, there is no question that those tariffs would, in fact, be going into effect.
00:20:37.420
Oren, where can people go to follow you and get more access to your writings?
00:21:22.240
We're always talking about the fake news and the bad.
00:21:26.300
And these are the guys who should be getting Pulisic.
00:21:33.240
Folks, did you know that scammers can literally steal your home right out from under you?
00:21:41.000
And it's a growing real estate scam which targets American homeowners.
00:21:45.800
Criminals forge your signature on one document and then use a fake notary stamp,
00:21:50.440
pay a small fee, and file with your local recorder's office.
00:21:54.100
And just like that, your home title has been transferred out of your name.
00:21:57.760
Then they can take out loans using your equity as collateral or even sell the property back behind you.
00:22:04.380
And you won't even know what's happening until you start getting collection or foreclosure notices.
00:22:10.560
When was the last time you checked your home title?
00:22:13.980
If you're not like me, the answer is, uh, never.
00:22:16.460
And that's exactly what scammers are counting on.
00:22:21.640
Their million-dollar triple lock protection helps keep your home and your equity safe.
00:22:32.880
And if fraud should happen, their U.S.-based restoration team will spend up to $1 million
00:22:37.980
to fix the fraud and restore your title at no additional cost.
00:22:44.380
I've teamed up with Home Title Lock to give you a free title history report
00:22:48.140
so you can find out if you're already a victim and access your personal title expert.
00:22:56.040
So go to HomeTitleLock.com and use my promo code POSO250
00:23:05.740
to get protection and peace of mind that you reserve.
00:23:09.380
All right, there's been a lot of stuff going on over at the Supreme Court.
00:23:12.720
Got to bring in Mike Davis' Article 3 project to walk us through all of it.
00:23:21.040
I think that the Supreme Court, the Chief Justice,
00:23:23.660
is finally starting to get his judicial house in order
00:23:27.860
after this unprecedented lawfare by these activist judges.
00:23:35.200
to cut government waste, fraud, and abuse to secure our border,
00:23:39.080
to deport illegal immigrants, especially terrorists.
00:23:42.760
And these activist parties have been going to these activist judges
00:23:46.700
and sabotaging President Trump exercising core Article II powers
00:23:51.440
with these unprecedented injunctions and TROs that aren't TROs,
00:23:57.000
temporary restraining orders that aren't temporary.
00:23:59.460
I think the Supreme Court, Justice Amy Coney Barrett in particular,
00:24:03.900
learned her lesson on the fact that just because an activist judge
00:24:08.420
calls something a temporary restraining order, it's not temporary.
00:24:13.100
And so therefore, you can immediately appeal it.
00:24:15.360
And so we can't sabotage the president exercising his Article II powers.
00:24:22.240
We saw that with Judge Boseberg getting slapped down by the Supreme Court
00:24:26.500
when he exposed and sabotaged an ongoing military operation four Saturdays ago,
00:24:32.220
putting American and allied lives in grave danger
00:24:35.560
so he can save his terrorist buddies from deportation to El Salvador.
00:24:46.440
that should help get these activist judges in line.
00:24:52.440
And so when you're looking at all of this, are there any specifics to this?
00:24:56.660
So, for example, we were chatting a little bit in the break,
00:25:04.140
and upheld by the Supreme Court is absolutely fantastic.
00:25:10.080
was that there's going to be a hearing process now.
00:25:14.600
Well, that's been the case law for a long time,
00:25:20.080
It's not the same due process that American citizens get in the courts.
00:25:24.960
It's just a minimal process on these illegal immigrants
00:25:39.020
That's your due process under the Alien Enemies Act of 1798.
00:27:04.600
because he, or at least he's an air traffic controller
00:27:16.520
I bet you they're not these Harvard law school nerds.
00:27:19.420
I bet you he has Green Berets as his law clerks.
00:27:21.460
And so let's send Judge Boesberg and his Green Beret law clerks
00:27:26.600
and he could be the jailhouse judge down in El Salvador.
00:27:36.160
and, you know, thick enough sheets and comforters
00:27:39.800
for their beds while they're down in El Salvador.
00:27:41.560
I mean, I think that's a really good use for Judge Boesberg.
00:27:44.680
Now that he's not persecuting American citizens
00:28:02.860
that I could think of that really ought to be sent down
00:28:10.280
I mean, we've got, I mean, last time I checked,
00:28:11.980
the United States government has plenty of aircraft
00:28:24.320
And again, they could be handling their due process law.
00:28:29.380
All of it would be done with the utmost standards
00:28:37.140
But so, Davis, when we're looking at this, though,
00:28:39.640
do you really think that what the court's doing here is,
00:28:43.100
hey, they're trying to get the Judicial House in order,
00:28:44.940
one of the big things that we were talking about
00:28:48.560
really was this question in a number of these cases.
00:28:51.380
It gets into the Separation of Powers Act, I think,
00:29:01.080
you know, got like 500 of them around the country,
00:29:11.360
And this obviously isn't the system that we were told
00:29:14.080
that we were building, that our founders intended on.
00:29:17.220
They wanted one president to be able to deal with,
00:29:33.840
because, look, under Article III of the Constitution,
00:29:45.320
of the parties before the court with redressable claims.
00:29:51.460
whether it's the parties who are suing or class actions.
00:29:55.420
You can certify class actions with multiple parties,
00:30:00.600
And this idea that federal judges can issue relief
00:30:11.120
which they clearly do not have legislative power.
00:30:13.800
The legislative power belongs to our elected members
00:30:40.080
Their job is to protect the rights of minorities.
00:30:43.560
It's not to have majoritarian legislative power.
00:30:58.200
because that kind of gets into the jurisdictional nature
00:31:07.080
that's supposed to actually be setting the norms,
00:31:16.260
man, I could go down this rabbit hole for a while,
00:31:42.200
They can't take away the Supreme Court's judicial power,
00:31:45.640
but they can certainly eliminate these lower courts.