Pres. John McCain's 2020 campaign has hit rock bottom, and now it's time to figure out who s going to replace him as the next president of the United States. Former Vice President Joe Biden, who was the one calling the shots in the vice presidential debate, tells CNN's Jake Tapper why he s running against Donald Trump for president in 2020, and why he thinks he can beat him.
00:01:04.520I can tell you with certainty that as recently as last Friday and Saturday after the debate, there were quite a few people who felt like it was just an off night.
00:01:13.840As of today, the ship has sailed, and there is basically almost no support remaining for him as the candidate, not against him personally, but because nobody thinks he can beat Trump.
00:01:58.640I got several questions, eight of them, and the four that were chosen were the ones that I approved.
00:02:03.340This is what the victory rally for the new French government looked like, and as you can see in that footage, there are far more Palestinian flags being waved than French flags.
00:02:12.300In fact, there are hardly any French flags at all.
00:02:14.980It comes as Marine Le Pen's National Rally Party was defeated in the second round of the French parliamentary elections, and the country's left-wing alliance, the new Popular Front, looks set to win after exit polling indicated it would win the most seats.
00:02:44.980Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to today's edition of Human Events Daily Live, Washington, D.C.
00:02:51.320Today is July 8th, 2024, and I know with Dominic.
00:02:55.700So I spent all weekend seeing what's going on, following the news, time with family here and there, emailing back and forth with Stephen K. Ben.
00:03:06.160And one of the big questions that I have is, how is it that we are living through a national security crisis, crisis right now, with the commander-in-chief of our military, which is engaged in a proxy war on the bloody eastern battlefields of Ukraine,
00:03:29.880with the Russian state, where he's publicly come out and stated that he's approved attacks on the Russian mainland, and yet we have no investigations, we have no calls for hearings, we have no subpoenas, we have no letters out from the House GOP demanding an answer to any of this.
00:03:55.000Lloyd Austin, what did you know and when did you know it?
00:03:59.880Secretary Mayorkas, what did you know and when did you know it?
00:04:03.600Now, we know Jen Psaki is going to be coming up soon.
00:04:25.800I believe that the Republicans still have control of the House.
00:04:28.860And if Republicans have control of the House, they have control of the oversight committees, which means they have oversight control of subpoena power.
00:04:36.660So if you control subpoena power, then guess what?
00:04:39.400We get, by the way, the Afghan withdrawal.
00:05:13.440Because we keep hearing these stories that Jill Biden and the senior leaders of the aides and Steve Reschetti and Ron Klain and all these people are putting these layers in between Biden and his actual administration.
00:05:25.680And so if that's the case, who is actually running the security of our country?
00:05:52.720Two million impressions over the weekend.
00:05:54.260Go in and post all my clips now with your own side admitting that your commander, our commander in chief, has no active brain cells right now.
00:06:08.300Human Events, got a lot of work to do today.
00:06:09.680Ladies and gentlemen, one of the best ways that you can support us here at Human Events and the work that we do is subscribing to us on our Rumble channel.
00:08:11.240Tell us, what are the updates and what's going on?
00:08:14.500Well, again, this is about fighting to protect Missouri's sovereign interest and participating in a national presidential election on equal footing with other states.
00:08:22.840We can't let a rogue progressive prosecutor and collusive judiciary in the state of New York upend the presidential election.
00:08:30.400This is the heat of a campaign in the most consequential presidential election in this nation's history.
00:08:35.600And Missourians need to have access to and to be able to hear from a presidential candidate, President Donald Trump.
00:08:42.280The founders contemplated that there would be disputes amongst the states, and they codified a method by which those grievances could be redressed.
00:08:51.880It's called the original action docket.
00:08:53.820And so the case has been filed by the Supreme Court, Missouri v. New York.
00:08:56.880We are waiting for the court to issue orders.
00:08:58.720What's likely to happen is that the court will issue an order to New York to provide some responsive briefing.
00:09:04.460And then the case will move forward from there.
00:09:06.300You know, everyone keeps saying, well, the Supreme Court's out of session.
00:09:08.420Well, that's because their appellate term ended.
00:09:10.600But they are always in session when it comes to original actions.
00:09:14.320So this case will be placed on the original action docket and will receive the review necessary in order to redress Missouri's grievances.
00:09:21.880We've got to fight back against this lawfare that's injecting poison into our democratic process.
00:09:26.900And this is the tool I have at my disposal to fight back.
00:09:29.000And what's interesting, though, is that we also, by the way, we also saw a filing from President Trump's own legal team against his case in New York.
00:09:41.020Potentially it would overturn his conviction because we have this new Supreme Court ruling that came down on immunity, which, of course, one of the functions of that was that evidence that was collected that had to do pertaining to official acts of the president cannot be used in criminal and civil proceedings.
00:09:57.100In fact, that ruling, by the way, I think is actually a little bit more sweeping than a lot of people realize, isn't it?
00:10:03.680It grants the president broad legal immunity for acts he performs in his official capacity.
00:10:09.280They're the core functions of the president.
00:10:10.900Certainly there's a fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine about evidence that would have been collected that, you know, would have been generated by one of his official acts.
00:10:18.380It's then used kind of in an ex post facto way to look back in time and to try to convict him of a crime from before he was president.
00:10:25.000And so, yeah, I think that, first of all, all of these cases should be dismissed.
00:10:29.460There should not be any criminal prosecution of President Trump because it's not supported by the facts or the law.
00:10:35.540These are all illicit witch hunt prosecutions.
00:10:37.520And the fact that the Supreme Court even had to weigh in demonstrates how desperate the left is to try to pin something on President Trump.
00:10:43.660But it was never intended to, you know, gain a legally valid conviction.
00:10:48.220These illicit witch hunt prosecutions are only intended to take him off the campaign trail.
00:10:52.020And that's why Missourians are harmed because they put a gag order on him where we can't hear from him.
00:10:56.260And we have a First Amendment right to hear from a political candidate as well as a right to participate in an election by accessing, physically being present with that presidential candidate.
00:11:05.860And if he's tied up in a New York courtroom or sentenced to house arrest or probation or, God forbid, prison, then Missourians' rights are violated.
00:11:12.940And that's why we're fighting so hard.
00:11:14.220Why, again, you know, I've asked you this before, but why is it that it seems that there's a tendency in the Republican Party, not just among the attorneys general, but Republicans writ large, when they get elected, to not take these kind of steps that you're fighting.
00:11:31.500To not actually go down this road, chop the wood, step up to the plate and take swings because, you know, it's, it's, you know, like you were talking before about being in the military and how we both served.
00:11:42.400It's that, you know, if our, if our military is engaged in a conflict, if we don't ever actually take the initiative, you can't actually win that conflict.
00:11:59.720So your only option is assault through the ambush.
00:12:01.860And that's what's guided my, my legal strategy throughout my career as an attorney and certainly as Missouri's attorney general.
00:12:07.560And so, yeah, if we don't have warriors that are willing to fight back and take the fight to the enemies of freedom, safety and prosperity, we're going to lose those things.
00:12:14.580And again, this lawfare is injecting poison into the democratic process and it goes beyond just the state of New York.
00:12:20.920So I would encourage, you know, my colleagues in any office to stand up and fight back and let your voice be heard and find weapons in your arsenal that you can use to engage the enemy of freedom.
00:12:31.060And this is key, by the way, because so the, you know, it's funny, the Biden campaign has a clip of me talking about my new book.
00:12:39.320We're talking about this very same situation and I had this phrase where I said, you have to, you can't just have principles.
00:12:47.020And so, of course, they click, they clip that without any of the context where I said, you also can't wield power without principles at the same time.
00:12:55.820But I've often looked at the problem is that the Republicans seem to be addicted to rules and say, well, if, you know, if my principles are the best, then I should just win automatically.
00:13:04.420And that's not actually how it works, because if you're not up there actually looking at tools, and this is, it's so key to what you just said, tools clearly within the legal process, within the legal framework, within the constitutional framework, we're not even talking about, you know, twisting the bounds of what's legal and constitutional that we see Bragg and Letitia James and Merrick Garland do every single day.
00:13:27.520It's simply looking at the framework that exists.
00:13:30.380And that's what you've done in this case.
00:13:31.780Look, you're demanding communications between the DOJ, between Alvin Bragg, AG Letitia James, and Fulton County Fannie Willis.
00:13:39.840And so we know, we know that these have been going on from the start.
00:13:44.920We can see, by the way, that they've been to the White House.
00:13:47.480We can see that they've been appointing people to various points of it.
00:13:49.880So the question is, you know, are there any communications?
00:13:52.240I think that's a fairly obvious thing to look at.
00:13:55.420And yet some people are saying, oh, this is reciprocity.
00:13:59.560It's beyond me to understand that there are conservatives who don't see this as a fight.
00:14:05.840Yeah, look, we know that there have been communications in the past, right?
00:14:09.320Think about 2016 with Lisa Page and Peter Strzok.
00:14:12.160I mean, how many text messages went back and forth in the deep state about how they were going to, you know, serve to undermine President Trump's administration?
00:14:19.180I mean, they were already after him before he had taken office.
00:14:21.540So you're telling me there aren't communications now?
00:14:50.960The people are owed transparency and accountability.
00:14:53.580And so my lawsuit against the DOJ is about exposing that level of collusion and, again, laying bare that incurable impropriety so the people can see it for what it is.
00:15:02.300And that, again, allows the Trump team to ask for dismissal of the case because of the incurable impropriety.
00:15:51.940The circumstances alone are enough to, again, impute the impropriety into the process that should justify dismissal of the charges at a minimum, certainly disqualification of those prosecutors, and certainly reversible errors.
00:16:05.620So our lawsuit is to obtain any and all communications between the state-level prosecutors and Biden's crooked Department of Justice.
00:16:12.160When he deployed Matthew Colangelo, the former DNC consultant and third-ranking official at his Department of Justice to assist Alvin Bragg, again, there was enough of an impropriety alone with Alvin Bragg.
00:16:22.800But that just doubles down because you've got a political opponent of President Trump doing President Biden's bidding in a New York state courtroom at that point.
00:16:30.820And this is the issue, and of course, this came up.
00:16:35.420I saw J.D. Vance, by the way, was getting questioned about this on NBC, and they were saying, oh, how can you allege this?
00:16:42.420He said it's the number three, the number three at the DOJ moving over to the Manhattan prosecutor's office.
00:16:49.800And he put the question on Christian Welker and said, how many times has this happened?
00:17:17.700People in Missouri want action, and that's what these lawsuits are all about.
00:17:21.040Both the lawsuit against the DOJ to force their transparency and accountability and in lawfare, the collusive relationship in the lawfare between the DOJ and the state prosecutors, but also against the state of New York, to allow President Trump to take to the campaign trail and speak with the full might of his voice and court the electorate and allow Missouri electors to have access to their chosen presidential candidate.
00:17:41.880Folks, this is showing how an attorney general can actually do their job.
00:17:47.840So if you're in a red state right now, you should be asking, why isn't my attorney general taking these steps, doing these things?
00:17:55.880Andrew, let's hold you over for a second because I want to drill down on some more.
00:17:59.340By the way, folks, 1776 at humanevents.com, 1776 at humanevents.com.
00:18:21.560In the hood, I rolled with bloods, and them boys had a saying.
00:18:26.220You can't be listening to all that slappy whack, trimatazolitzabam ship, nippy bam bam, like Human Events with Jack Posobiec.
00:18:35.020All right, Jack Posobiec back, Live Human Events Daily.
00:18:37.760Folks, I want to tell you about today's episode sponsor, Chalk.
00:18:40.540Chalk offers a whole lineup of products formulated to increase your energy, focus, balance, your hormones, detoxify your body, boost your testosterone.
00:18:48.600Their products are organic and all natural.
00:18:50.440It's isn't overpriced vegetable pills or powder.
00:18:52.860They, and you will feel the difference, they have the clinical studies to back it up all over the site.
00:18:57.280For a limited time, get 35% off any Chalk subscription for life.
00:19:00.740Just go to Chalk.com, spelled C-H-O-Q, and use promo code POSO.
00:19:04.240Chalk was created as a way to combat the contaminated food supply that has been depleting you of essential nutrients and draining men of energy and testosterone.
00:19:12.640It's time to make America great again, and to do that, we need to make men's vitality great again.
00:19:49.580You represent the people and obviously the state of Missouri.
00:19:53.340But these are cases between Donald Trump and the city of New York, cases between the Department of Justice.
00:19:59.840How is it that you have standing to go up against these various entities in your current position?
00:20:05.860Well, it's because Missourians' rights to participate on equal footing in the democratic process, in the national presidential election, in the heat of the campaign, in the most consequential presidential election in this nation's history, those rights are being violated.
00:20:19.060Again, if you look at the normal criminal appeal process, it's unique to an individual.
00:20:24.760So the individual defendant has an appeal.
00:20:27.460It can take 18 to 24 months to adjudicate that appeal.
00:20:30.380But that process is inadequate to redress Missouri's grievances because of the defendant here.
00:20:35.860It's a presidential candidate in the heat of the campaign.
00:20:38.640And so the gag order is one of the most pernicious elements of this lawfare in the sense that President Trump has a First Amendment right to speech.
00:20:46.660But Missourians also have a First Amendment right to hear President Trump's political speech.
00:20:51.100The First Amendment covers speakers and listeners.
00:20:53.740So our rights as listeners are being violated during this campaign.
00:20:57.040Also, his physical presence, he's being tethered to a Manhattan courtroom for weeks at a time, potentially sentenced to prison at a minimum, you know, probation, house arrest, community service.
00:21:05.860Those things will take him off the campaign trail and deny Missourians of access to a presidential candidate.
00:21:11.720And by statute, under the caucus system in Missouri, we have electors that have been selected to go cast votes for a presidential candidate at a convention.
00:21:20.000And if they can't hear from and access that presidential candidate, then their rights are violated.
00:21:24.760Finally, there's a doctrine in law called the Purcell Doctrine.
00:21:27.340It essentially stands for the proposition that courts should not meddle in elections and those considerations become heightened the closer you get to an election.
00:21:37.440And the court is really afraid of people, you know, a judge through a judicial decision injecting confusion into the election process.
00:21:55.260Is he going to be able to be the president if he's sentenced to prison?
00:21:58.100And so, again, this the the the judiciary in New York's actions are violating and running up against and running afoul of that Purcell doctrine.
00:22:06.600And there you go, folks, it's that simple.
00:22:11.400The rights of your citizens are being violated.
00:22:15.340And if those constitutional rights are being violated, that gives you standing.
00:22:20.140So to anyone out there, I got an email in here from Joe in South Carolina asking about Alan Wilson.
00:22:28.620You can show them that segment right here where A.G.
00:22:31.460Bailey just explained it to everyone that this is how you lay the framework for it.
00:22:36.300And so I wanted to ask you and this obviously stepping out of your lane from as you're as an attorney general.
00:22:42.500But I want to go back to your lane as a as a combat veteran and ask you this question, because it's something I was talking about recently as well.
00:22:50.420That's we have this NATO summit coming up tomorrow.
00:22:53.040Joe Biden hosting the NATO summit, bringing all the NATO members here, as well as Japan, South Korea.
00:22:58.840And, of course, Zelensky from Ukraine are all coming to Washington, D.C.
00:23:04.080Biden is going to be running this thing.
00:23:05.520But at the same time, we're also being told that Biden hasn't been the one running his administration.
00:23:12.420We're being told that his senior aides and political staffers are keeping him separated from the rest of his cabinet, separated from making the decision process.
00:23:21.720Because this goes completely against our chain of command.
00:23:26.900It's a violation of the chain of command.
00:23:28.460No commanding officer in a unit, no divo in a unit, division officer in a unit would be able to run things this way.
00:23:35.600So shouldn't there be investigations and why aren't there investigations into who is actually making these orders, who is actually calling the shots?
00:23:43.940Because when I hear stuff like this, and I've been calling for the House Republicans quite strongly to ask Jen Psaki, bring up General Milley and all these others, particularly as pertains to the Afghanistan withdrawal and what we saw in Kabul.
00:23:55.580Who was calling the shots, who was putting those orders out, because if that wasn't actually Joe Biden, then there's a real question as to whether or not those were legal and lawful orders delivered by the commander chief.
00:24:07.520Walk people through the process of how it is supposed to work and how it could work if, as they tell us, as the media tells us, that this guy might not actually be running things.
00:24:17.620Yeah, I mean, it's a frightening day when you've got a president who lacks the mental faculties to, you know, basically execute the core functions of his office.
00:24:26.540But it is especially true in a military situation where you've got this linear chain of command all the way up through the Department of Defense with the ultimate and the only civilian able to issue orders to the military being the commander in chief at the very top, the apex of that chain of command.
00:24:44.740And so, yeah, if his staff has cloistered him and are making decisions and communicating those decisions as if they're coming from him, attributing those decisions to him, when in fact they're not, then those decisions and those orders would lack the legal authority and the imprimatur of the chain of command.
00:24:58.800And again, this is frightening, and especially so when you look at the disastrous withdrawal in Afghanistan where innocent Americans were killed.
00:25:05.400And certainly we left our honor on the battlefield in a full retreat because Biden couldn't be bothered to do his job and to do it well, and the generals still haven't been held accountable.
00:25:15.720I think it's high time that there be congressional inquiry into these matters.
00:25:18.660I think that you need look no further than the fact that the Department of Justice declined to prosecute President Biden for a much more egregious case of mishandling classified documents than they have to drum up charges against President Trump.
00:25:32.120And the excuse from the DOJ as well, President Biden's an enfeebled old man, and no one's going to believe he had the requisite mental state to take these documents and to know what he was taking.
00:25:41.060Well, then he shouldn't be running the country, and there's a constitutional mechanism by which the cabinet can remove him.
00:25:46.040And so they should absolutely be exploring those options, and if they're not going to do it, then Congress needs to investigate why they're not using the mechanisms at their disposal to ensure the safety of this country.
00:25:57.500This is the guy with the nuclear codes.
00:25:59.320This is a guy who's calling into MSNBC, screaming at Joe and Mika and melting down, challenge me, fight me, face me on all this, and he seems like he's acting more and more desperate and deranged.
00:26:14.440But there's a serious question, a national security question.
00:26:18.420We're told that he only works from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m., and David Steinberg, who's a follower of the show, just commented,
00:26:25.020well, if that's true, then who is the commander-in-chief from 4 p.m. to 10 a.m.?
00:26:52.060And to your point, this is exactly what Herr said, that you couldn't criminally prosecute him for this because of his mental state.
00:26:59.400That being said, how does it not trigger the 25th Amendment?
00:27:05.240I think it has to trigger the 25th Amendment.
00:27:07.380I think that, you know, the drafters and ratifiers of the 25th Amendment contemplated that there would be situations where a president would be incapacitated and unable to perform the functions of the job.
00:27:17.080And so the cabinet, it's up to them to get around a table, discuss the matter, cast a vote, and then transmit those findings to the appropriate leadership in Congress.
00:27:24.900And if they're not going to do it, then they should have to answer to Congress.
00:27:28.460At the end of the day, again, this is going to require bold action on somebody's part to hold the wrongdoers accountable.
00:28:56.860He was duly voted for by the members of your party.
00:29:01.040He's legally the nominee or at least the presumptive nominee.
00:29:04.900He'll be legally the nominee at Chicago.
00:29:07.580And so the question is, are they just openly admitting?
00:29:10.800I'll give this to you for the last minute.
00:29:12.240Are they openly admitting that this isn't it's not just the party?
00:29:16.020It's an administration in a national security.
00:29:19.060Well, maybe not a crisis, but an admission, a grave admission that we are not actually controlled by the chain of command as is formally constituted.
00:29:30.780You know, a failure to act, an omission in activity when the situation requires activity is, you know, misfeasance, malfeasance, nonfeasance.
00:29:40.360You know, this is clearly a legal problem.
00:29:43.200You have a lack of legal authority for the orders that are being issued from the White House.
00:29:48.160If they're not coming from the commander in chief, you've got, you know, a group, a slate of administrative officials, cabinet leaders who are failing and refusing to discharge their constitutional obligations under the 25th Amendment.
00:30:00.520At some point, this becomes what it is, a constitutional crisis.
00:31:30.320Come right on the show and explain to us what the game plan is to get to the bottom of the national security crisis that the United States is currently in.
00:31:39.020You've got this guy going to NATO tomorrow, literally tomorrow, right down the street in the D.C. Convention Center, and he's going to be addressing them at a time when he's a cadaver.
00:32:07.920My question is, do we have a president?
00:32:10.480And if we don't have a president, who is in charge of NATO?
00:32:13.580And if we don't know who's in charge, then what?
00:32:15.320So everybody wants to know, who is Donald Trump's VP pick?
00:32:19.240And we talked about this the other day.
00:32:21.560I would like to go through it as well.
00:32:23.120So sending your questions, comments on this one is, in addition, we'll get to it in a second, because I want to give some time people to get it in.
00:32:30.4801776Humanevents.com, who should Donald Trump's VP be?
00:32:35.100You listen to the media, you hear Burgum, J.D. Vance, and Marco Rubio.
00:32:40.940Those are the top three that we currently hear.
00:32:43.380We also know that President Trump is going to be holding events coming up in the following week.
00:32:48.820So typically, all right, let me walk back for a second.
00:32:50.700Typically, the vice president is announced prior to the convention, because the convention is a time and will be there.
00:33:36.760Doug Burgum is someone who, as we said before, he has a lot of ties to the energy industry, American energy dominance,
00:33:44.260someone who could definitely lead the way on that.
00:33:46.340But at the same time, as we've highlighted, a lot of these ties to Bill Gates, to Microsoft, to selling out the farmland to Bill Gates of North Dakota.
00:34:00.080He's also a little bit older there, at least compared to the other two.
00:34:04.540So Rubio's in his 50s, and J.D. Vance, of course, is in his 30s.
00:34:08.940And so he would be someone who may be able to run again in 2028, but not necessarily someone who would be really talking about for going forward.
00:34:21.520So Rubio would be able to, now Rubio, of course, ties directly into the neocon side of things.
00:34:28.500Obviously, he's been in D.C. a lot longer.
00:34:30.620And on Rubio's section, there's a huge issue, two huge issues.
00:34:34.500Number one, the fact that he's been associated with amnesty so much in the past, has been totally associated with amnesty.
00:34:42.560And it's just, for a lot of Republicans, it's going to be a non-starter on that very issue.
00:34:46.740In addition to his support for neoconservatism and, you know, all of these various wars of adventure.
00:34:53.280People say he's gotten better over the years.
00:39:37.460And as it turns out, I'm actually from Pennsylvania.
00:39:39.900We've got a message here from Susan says, J.D. Vance or Vivek Ramaswamy.
00:39:45.560Now, Vivek is an interesting, is a very interesting, we've got a lot of emails coming in here late.
00:39:49.480So I'm going to pull those up in the next segment because we're running up on a break.
00:39:53.460Vivek is an interesting case because, again, like J.D. Vance, newcomer to politics, comes from that business background, also has a biotech background.
00:40:01.680But in terms of track record, isn't a senator, hasn't been a governor, hasn't been a congressman.
00:40:07.460And so the question is, how would he play?
00:40:10.060I think Vivek has all the makings of a cabinet member, a solid cabinet member, because I think he's someone who would be easily confirmable.
00:40:19.720I saw some people, by the way, talking about John Ratcliffe or attorney general.
00:40:23.980Vivek Ramaswamy, what cabinet, send this in, send this in, 1776humanevents.com.
00:40:28.860What cabinet position would you see for Vivek Ramaswamy?
00:40:34.020Homeland Security? DOJ? Probably not DOJ.
00:40:38.020But no, that's an interesting question.
00:40:40.960UN ambassador? By the way, cards on the table.
00:40:43.840I would love to see, here's one for UN ambassador, Tulsi Gabbard.
00:40:48.620Someone who would absolutely drive the globalists insane.
00:40:52.760We're going to talk about the globalists a little bit coming up next here.
00:40:58.860The boring people at your office. I'm trying to listen to the new human events with Jack Posobiec.
00:41:06.200All right, Jack Posobiec, we're back here live. Human events daily. Final segment here.
00:41:09.920We're talking about where are the Republicans?
00:41:12.660Is Donald Trump the only Republican in America?
00:41:15.200Is Donald Trump the only one carrying the entire Republican Party on its back?
00:41:20.340So, you know, the question, of course, is like, what's the deal?
00:41:26.280I've got a couple more emails. This is great from Don.
00:41:29.400Don says, Jack, there are three reasons why Republicans don't fight back.
00:41:33.500Number one, corrupted. Number two, compromised. Number three, coercion.
00:41:36.680They are too connected and controlled by their paymasters slash donors.
00:41:40.560Here's Jeff in Florida, willing to see if any of our Republican leaders are willing to fight for this country.
00:41:45.900This is the greatest experiment into the human condition, the USA, to see if the broken condition will choose fighting for right or choose greed, power and control.
00:41:55.920One path saves the country. The other destroys it.
00:41:59.120Will human beings let this great experiment called the United States collapse without a shot fired?
00:42:04.040I believe this is going to be the course before us.
00:42:07.240Or if Republicans don't want to fight for this country, then let the ones who want it have it the most.
00:42:12.160At this point, there's no turning back the wheels that drive the bus called the Republican Party.
00:42:16.100And by the way, you know, because, of course, people are talking about Project 2025 and bloodless revolution.
00:42:21.260We don't want there to be shots fired.
00:42:23.540That's the point. That's what we're all saying.
00:42:25.420We want this to be solved politically.
00:42:27.020And we just want our leaders to actually step up and do the work.
00:45:57.500The chaos is coming from the ruling class, and they are unleashing their hordes.
00:46:00.980They're unleashing their Antifa militias.
00:46:04.120They're going to be unleashing migrants, by the way, on the UK and France.
00:46:07.740And by the way, so for everybody who thinks that it's all sunshine and roses because Biden's in a state of collapse,
00:46:13.280you think for a second that the ruling class in this country won't make a deal with the devil here in the United States to stop Donald Trump from being elected?
00:46:22.240Do you think that they're just going to allow him to have a landslide?
00:46:26.160Do you think that these people, do you think that these people are going to just let you save your country?
00:46:33.960They're just going to let you have your country back?