00:00:00.000Hi, it's John and welcome to the channel. Great to have you here today, Thursday, July
00:00:07.520the 2nd, 444 AM with the Big Blue Mug of Coffee. I appreciate your time. By the way, if you
00:00:14.180were to click on subscribe right now, you would help me get to 53,000 subscribers. Thank
00:00:19.980you very much. I'm not going to take too much time on this today. I say that often. I think
00:00:25.600I accomplish that most of the time. I know your time is very important to you. It's valuable.
00:00:30.000I've got lots to do this morning. And honestly, this topic kind of makes me mad. It infuriates
00:00:37.780me, actually. I'm going to talk about something that's happening today quickly. I'm going to
00:00:42.860talk quickly about something that happened the other day. And we're going to actually discuss
00:00:46.600today something that Mark Carney is accomplishing that's actually apparently going to happen.
00:00:53.360The only thing I think he's accomplished in a year. We'll wrap it up with that at the end.
00:00:58.260I call Carney the performative prime minister. And we're going to talk about that today in a
00:01:03.320number of different ways, I think. So this is an article that I read just yesterday. Okay. So
00:01:10.780here's, here's Danielle Smith, premier of Alberta with Mark Carney, prime minister of the country.
00:01:14.940This takes us back to November 27th when they signed the memorandum of understanding to get
00:01:20.180a pipeline. So Danielle Smith today in Canada, in Alberta, as a matter of fact, 26 kilometers from
00:01:27.600where I live, Danielle Smith is going to make a submission of a pipeline project to Mark Carney's
00:01:35.140major projects office. So this is the way things work in Canada now. It used to be politicians
00:01:43.260would walk out at calling a news conference. They're going to walk out and they'd say,
00:01:47.260we're building something, but we don't do that in Canada now. You know what we do? We come out and
00:01:52.400make an announcement about something we might build because there is no pipeline. There is no
00:01:58.920investment in the pipeline from what I understand. Now, if she comes out today and says she has an
00:02:03.460investor, I'm going to take that with a grain of salt because at this point, the people on the
00:02:09.640screen here, Danielle Smith and Mark Carney would say pretty much anything to make you believe
00:02:14.640there's a pipeline happening because Alberta is going to have a vote on independence on October
00:02:20.32019th, or at least to get a vote on independence on October 19th. They will say anything at this
00:02:25.920point because Daniel Smith has got to save face and Mark Carney's got to look like he's actually
00:02:31.040accomplishing something, but he isn't. There is no pipeline. They're going to announce a possible,
00:02:36.580maybe perhaps, pipeline today. So let's move on to the next story. And this really inspired
00:02:42.940today's video. And this really infuriates me. Carney did a video the other day talking about
00:02:51.040energy in Canada, how important it is. And he really spoke mostly about his national
00:02:57.000electricity program, which I've discussed here before, and said that it's basically a clean
00:03:02.480energy program. It's all about sustainable energy. He throws in a little mix of gas,
00:03:07.540but it's windmills and solar panels because this is who Mark Carney is. This is in his nature. So
00:03:13.380it's the last four words of this headline you have to read and kind of take in. Okay. Carney's pivot
00:03:20.100on climate change, the right move, but is it real? Listen, it was only about a year ago that he was
00:03:28.020the UN envoy to climate change. And he was the head of the Glasgow financial alliance for net
00:03:34.560Zero, which tried to discourage companies from investing in oil and gas. Okay, so let's just
00:03:42.300read a little bit of this article, link in the description. So the first paragraph is infuriating
00:03:48.620because this is how much their climate change plans have cost you as a Canadian. Prime Minister
00:03:54.020Mark Carney's pre-Canada Day pivot away from Justin Trudeau's failed $200 billion plus climate
00:04:00.900strategy after supporting it up to late last year is a classic example of what makes the public
00:04:06.820cynical about politics. The timing was strategic after Parliament had adjourned for the summer
00:04:12.340and the day before Canada Day. I might add it was strategic because Danielle Smith is going to roll0.99
00:04:17.580out this perhaps possible maybe pipeline today. When Canadians were thinking about barbecues and
00:04:23.000fireworks, not industrial greenhouse gas emission targets, on one level it's the right decision.
00:04:28.540assuming Carney can be trusted, which is open to question, given that prior to entering politics,
00:04:34.440he was the UN Special Envoy for Climate Change, as I just said, and the chair of GFANS, the Glasgow
00:04:40.240Financial Alliance for Net Zero, and the leading global corporate advocate for higher carbon taxes.
00:04:45.880Folks, this was just last year that he was still talking about this stuff. Just a year before that,
00:04:52.040he was these things. This was his shtick. And now he's turning back on it. Can you believe him?
00:04:57.640Now he says Trudeau's plan, while well-intentioned and suited for the time it was created, would in today's world reduce Canada's economic growth and increase Western alienation.
00:05:08.120And as you can see, I put that last little bit in red here because it reduced Canada's economic growth in the past too by a lot.
00:07:01.820The changes we have made will mean that our emissions will be higher in the next few years than they were projected to be under the previous government's plan.
00:07:10.440But in my judgment, that plan was not sustainable over the long term.
00:07:15.140It would have been too expensive for Canadians, Canadians who are already struggling with affordability.
00:07:22.920It would have let down our partners who need new sources of energy,
00:07:26.820and it would do so right at the time when we need them to help us become more independent of the United States.
00:07:35.460And it would have been too divisive for our country.
00:07:39.440In the current environment, the old plan was an open opportunity for those people who wish to pull Canada apart, both at home and from abroad.
00:07:49.360He talks about how Trudeau's policies today would harm you because of affordability issues, because you can't afford things today.
00:07:58.000That's exactly what they did for 10 years, and he was all in favor of that.