Mark Carney - Problematic Tax Shelters and Judicial Investigations - Slimy⧸Unethical⧸Liberal
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
175.20638
Summary
On Wednesday, a story broke about Mark Carney and a Bermuda tax shelter for Brookfield, and I have a different perspective on this from a conservative point of view, and why this should not have happened. I also discuss a report from the Centre for International Corporate Tax Accountability (CICAA) that alleges that Brookfield engaged in a "pattern of aggressive tax avoidance" across its operations across the globe.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Hi, it's John and welcome to the channel. Great to have you along today. It is still Wednesday,
00:00:04.860
March the 26th. It's 3.42 p.m. with my big blue mug of coffee. I'm recording this early because
00:00:10.680
I want to get a bit of a sleep in on Thursday morning. So you're watching this on Thursday
00:00:14.700
morning. So on Wednesday, the story broke about Mark Carney and a Bermuda tax shelter for
00:00:22.160
Brookfield. And I think I have a different perspective on this from a conservative point
00:00:27.080
of view and the way Paulyev should play this or should have played this. And I have a question
00:00:33.160
regarding Mark Carney and whether he should be having different accommodations right now. We'll
00:00:38.540
get to that in just a moment. So the story is here on the National Post. Carney defends Brookfield's
00:00:44.540
use of Bermuda tax shelters, says structure help pensioners. If we go down here, Carney told
00:00:51.680
reporters at a campaign stop in Windsor, Ontario, that the funds were registered in Bermuda to
00:00:56.940
avoid double taxation. Quote, the important thing is that the flow through of the funds
00:01:02.240
go to Canadian entities who then pay the taxes appropriately, as opposed to taxes being paid
00:01:09.060
multiple times before they get there, unquote, said Carney. So let's, let's watch that video.
00:01:15.360
Could I just follow up on that? Could you explain in that, in the case of those Brookfield funds,
00:01:19.280
like what was the argument for registering the funds in Bermuda? Is it ethical to do that? And is
00:01:25.580
it something as prime minister that you'd have to crack down on? I'm not sure if it's a problem,
00:01:29.500
but is that something that you'd have to crack down? I think the important thing, Tom, is that
00:01:33.500
the flow through of the funds go to the, go to Canadian entities who then pay the, pay the taxes
00:01:41.380
appropriately, as opposed to taxes being paid multiple times before they get there. So that's
00:01:47.300
how we have the structure. That's the structure that all of our pension funds, by example.
00:01:53.000
So there's a couple things there. There's one thing he says, I'll translate what he says there to the
00:01:58.140
best of my ability. And there's another thing that he avoids there. So the first thing is,
00:02:03.260
he says, if it benefits Canadians down the road, it's okay for Brookfield to avoid taxes in Canada
00:02:10.560
and find a tax shelter in Bermuda because the people down the road are paying the taxes. So that's a
00:02:15.440
great bit of information to know if you're a business. And this is not illegal from what I
00:02:23.280
understand. This is right above board, but you have to properly report to the Canada Revenue Agency.
00:02:29.480
So I would be looking into that. He says, everything's above board, but do you trust this
00:02:35.000
guy? Because I don't trust this guy as far as I can throw him. Now, the other thing he doesn't say
00:02:39.680
in there, he's asked right off the top, is this ethical? He didn't answer that question because I
00:02:44.820
don't think this is ethical at all. I've got some, I've got a different perspective on this from the
00:02:52.380
conservative standpoint. I mentioned that off the top. So stay tuned for that. But the other thing
00:02:55.980
in this story, let's go back to the National Post story. The stuff in yellow here is really a concern
00:03:02.300
to me. People are thinking about the Bermuda tax shelter, but it's this line right here in this
00:03:06.560
National Post story that really concerns me. And remember, I just said, I don't trust this guy as far
00:03:11.820
as I can throw him. The funds were geared toward investments in green energy and infrastructure
00:03:16.160
holding combined assets of $25 billion. Brookfield invested in green energy and infrastructure
00:03:22.280
and they did that in Canada. Who was the economic advisor of Justin Trudeau while he was at Brookfield?
00:03:31.160
That would be Mark Carney. I want to know how he personally benefited from influencing the
00:03:38.820
government of Canada to invest in green energy and infrastructure to the tune of $25 billion.
00:03:45.700
We don't know this because he hasn't divulged all his information. He says everything's fine.
00:03:51.340
Do you trust him? Go back to me. I can trust him as far as I can throw him. I'm really concerned
00:03:58.800
about that part of this. I mean, this guy is as slimy as it get, folks. I mean, look at this article
00:04:04.500
right here. This is from 2023. International tax watchdog questions asset management giant Brookfield's
00:04:11.340
tax transparency. I'll just read a little bit of this to you. The Center for International Corporate
00:04:16.480
Tax Accountability and Research, SICTAR, I'm going to call it that, released the report Tuesday which
00:04:21.380
alleges the firm engages in tax avoidance and challenges the company on its claim to be a
00:04:26.640
responsible and sustainable investor. Brookfield's track record of alleged tax dodging has received
00:04:32.920
some attention in Australia and Canada where it may claim the title of Canada's top tax dodger,
00:04:38.620
the report reads, and there is an apparent pattern of aggressive tax avoidance consistent across its
00:04:44.200
global operations. Brookfield disputes the claim saying in an email to the Star, and this is in
00:04:49.520
the Toronto Star. If we go down here to the bottom, despite Brookfield's assertion, SICTAR's report
00:04:56.180
concludes with a demand Brookfield Corp adopt more transparent practices. Brookfield has opposed the
00:05:02.860
resolution. SICTAR says, quoting a response from Brookfield saying it doesn't believe the company
00:05:08.000
has any tax-related negative impacts on human rights, the economy, or environment, among other
00:05:14.360
concerns. If that's the case, SICTAR argues, there should be nothing to fear with providing greater
00:05:20.340
transparency. Again, this guy is as slimy as he gets because you go over here, here's an article,
00:05:27.820
Mark Carney's G-Fans, that's the Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero, remember he's Mr. Net Zero,
00:05:33.540
targeted in bombshell climate cartel report by the U.S. Judiciary Committee. This is from June 25th,
00:05:39.980
2024. This is an ongoing investigation. Go down here, issued by the U.S. House Judiciary Subcommittee
00:05:46.980
on the administrative state, regulatory reform and antitrust, the climate control report targets
00:05:52.480
groups like Mark Carney's G-Fans and Climate Action 100, among others. The report claims that the
00:05:59.920
climate cartel imposes these radical policies by weaponizing ever-escalating pressure tactics on
00:06:06.420
corporations. One of the tactics is forcing companies to make immaterial disclosure of carbon
00:06:12.080
emissions, a tactic being pushed in the U.S. and Canada. Mark Carney has been involved in pressuring
00:06:18.780
financial organizations to divest from the oil and gas industry. That is under investigation right
00:06:25.200
now with this organization called G-Fans. And here's Mark Carney on record saying what happens
00:06:30.980
to companies who don't follow along with his rules when it comes to net zero.
00:06:35.540
Society is putting tremendous value on achieving net zero. So the companies and those who invest in
00:06:43.180
them and lend to them who are part of the solution will be rewarded. But those who are lagging behind
00:06:48.820
and are still part of the problem will be punished.
00:06:51.560
The guy's about as slimy as you can get. People are going to vote for this guy. He reminds me of
00:06:57.320
Mr. Burns from The Simpsons, right? But here's the thing. He's admitted to doing both of these
00:07:04.500
things. You've seen clips. He's admitted that, yeah, he was putting pressure on companies or you get
00:07:09.980
punished. And yeah, we were putting money in Bermuda to avoid taxes, but the money was going to somebody
00:07:15.980
else and they paid the taxes. But he's admitted to these things. I was talking about different
00:07:19.800
accommodations. I'm talking about a jail cell. If this isn't about board, you should send the guy
00:07:25.260
to jail. Tax avoidance. But I think that the conservatives maybe should look at this in a
00:07:31.520
different way. And here's where I'm thinking differently here. And I wrote it down. I put
00:07:35.380
it down. I typed it into my computer so I wouldn't forget my train of thought here. So let me read it
00:07:39.520
to you. What I wrote. I think a good play for Polyev would be Mr. Carney and Brookfield. Good call.
00:07:47.060
Great business decision. Just like moving Brookfield to New York. I mentioned earlier it was a great
00:07:51.940
business decision to move to New York. You avoid the awful taxation of Canada, the horrendous economy
00:07:58.100
and the stifling regulations of the government of Canada. A liberal government, I might add.
00:08:03.520
The Bermuda tax haven might be illegal if you haven't filed with the Canada Revenue Agency.
00:08:09.620
It's highly questionable and definitely unethical, particularly for somebody running as prime
00:08:15.240
minister. But from a business standpoint, a lot of people might do the same to get around
00:08:20.040
the awful business environment caused by the liberal government you advised for years.
00:08:24.740
Wouldn't that be great if Polyev came out and said that? Listen, we're very few days into
00:08:31.440
this election campaign. And I mentioned the net zero thing here. His environmental record is an
00:08:37.000
absolute nightmare. And that's what scares the hell out of me, should he be elected and the liberals get
00:08:42.160
back in. And that's going to come to light. If not very soon, Polyev should get into it on the election
00:08:48.600
trail, but it should be brought up during the debate. And he needs to hammer him on that because
00:08:54.380
this guy is a climate zealot. But what do you think about this video? Please let me know.
00:08:59.700
Leave a comment. Give me a thumbs up. We're getting towards 18,000 people on the channel,
00:09:05.120
so subscribe to the channel. And ring the bell for notifications, and I'll see you in the next one.