Juno News - May 13, 2025


Alberta's first official separation referendum question

Topics
Mentioned
Preston Manning: Mark Carney will be Canada’s LAST Prime Minister CBC ATTACKS the Conservatives for… wanting to protect election integrity?

Episode Stats


Length

14 minutes

Words per minute

147.29

Word count

2,071

Sentence count

101


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

The Alberta Prosperity Project has announced the official separation referendum it hopes to pose to citizens. Alberta Premier Daniel Smith unveiled a freeze to the industrial carbon tax. The BC NDP government is prohibiting non-indigenous people from accessing the Joffrey Lakes Provincial Park.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
Hosts, guests, and mentioned names generated with spaCy (en_core_web_sm), reconciled against Wikidata.
00:00:00.000 The Alberta Prosperity Project has announced the official separation referendum question
00:00:09.900 it hopes to pose to citizens. Alberta Premier Daniel Smith unveiled a freeze to the industrial
00:00:16.000 carbon tax. The BC NDP government is prohibiting non-indigenous people from accessing the Joffrey
00:00:23.040 Lakes Provincial Park. Hello Canada, it's Tuesday, May 13th and this is the True North Daily Brief.
00:00:29.460 I'm Cosmin Georgia. And I'm Jeff Knight. We've got you covered with all the news you need to know.
00:00:35.760 Let's discuss the top stories of the day and the True North exclusives you won't hear anywhere else.
00:00:44.680 The Alberta Prosperity Project has unveiled the question it plans to put to Albertans
00:00:50.280 if a citizen-initiated referendum on separation from Canada proceeds. Constitutional lawyer and
00:00:57.500 general counsel with the Alberta Prosperity Project, Geoffrey Rath, announced the proposed
00:01:02.880 referendum question on Monday. The question reads, quote, do you agree that the province of Alberta
00:01:08.840 shall become a sovereign country and cease to be a province of Canada? The group is currently
00:01:14.900 collecting signatures as part of a pre-registration effort required to submit a formal referendum
00:01:21.360 petition with Elections Alberta. Due to technical issues, live updates on the signature count have
00:01:28.280 been suspended. However, as of Monday, the Alberta Prosperity Project has secured at least 240,000
00:01:35.360 signatures. While the province has proposed legislation to lower the legal referendum signatures
00:01:41.700 threshold from 600,000 to 177,000, the bill has yet to pass. Therefore, the Alberta Prosperity Project
00:01:50.480 still has its targets set on the 600,000 goal, although it will likely be reduced to 177,000 shortly.
00:01:59.340 The organization, a non-partisan group, outlined a roadmap to sovereignty. First, the group aims to
00:02:06.040 educate Albertans on the significance of sovereignty and the process for accomplishing it. Next, it plans
00:02:12.340 to collect 600,000 signatures within 90 days. Again, this is based on previous legislation and will likely
00:02:19.960 soon change to 177,000 signatures within 120 days. While progressing towards the referendum, the project
00:02:28.600 said it would support political leaders who align with the goal of sovereignty. The key initiatives
00:02:34.680 proposed by the group are establishing an Alberta pension plan and a provincial police force. The project
00:02:41.560 also calls for the province to have greater authority over immigration management, tax collection,
00:02:47.640 and employment insurance. Jeff, since the election of Mark Carney as Prime Minister at the federal level,
00:02:56.280 there has been an explosion in interest in Alberta separation and sovereignty. And there are quite a few
00:03:03.160 groups, if I'm not mistaken, that have emerged or were pre-existing before this happened. So Jeff,
00:03:10.360 could you just enlighten our listeners? What are some of the other groups attempting to introduce a
00:03:15.960 separation referendum or approaching Alberta sovereignty politically? Yeah, Cosman, the Alberta Prosperity
00:03:23.240 Project's referendum push isn't the only effort in Alberta challenging the province's ties to Canada.
00:03:28.040 There's several groups that are pushing separation or greater sovereignty through various means.
00:03:32.600 The Independent Party of Alberta, a registered political party, advocates for Alberta's full
00:03:37.480 independence through electoral politics, focusing on negotiating with Ottawa for control over taxation,
00:03:42.600 pensions, and immigration, as outlined on their website in March 2024. They ran candidates in the 2023
00:03:48.680 provincial election, but didn't secure seats. Similarly, the Wild Rose Independence Party, active
00:03:54.280 since 2020, pushes for outright independence, with their 2023 platform calling for withdrawing from the
00:04:00.440 Canada pension plan and creating an Alberta revenue agency, capturing 2.3% of the vote in that election.
00:04:06.600 Other groups take a broader approach to sovereignty within Confederation. Alberta First focuses on
00:04:11.560 grassroots advocacy, urging Alberta to assert autonomy by opting out of federal programs like the Canada
00:04:17.240 Health Act and drafting a provincial constitution. They've held town halls with 5,000 attendees in 2023.
00:04:22.920 The Freedom Conservative Party of Alberta, though smaller, has supported a sovereignty referendum since
00:04:27.880 2019, advocating for a sovereignty act to nullify federal laws, a concept echoed in Premier Daniel
00:04:34.360 Smith's Alberta sovereignty within a United Canada Act, passed in December 2022. These groups
00:04:39.640 collectively highlight a range of strategies, political, grassroots and legislative, aiming to
00:04:44.280 either separate from Canada or secure greater provincial autonomy.
00:04:51.480 The Alberta government is freezing its industrial carbon tax at $95 per ton of emissions to protect
00:04:57.160 businesses from growing uncertainty caused by the ongoing tariff war. The province argues it can reduce
00:05:02.440 emissions through technological innovation, not unrealistically high taxes as required by the federal
00:05:08.040 government. Alberta Premier Daniel Smith and Environment Minister Rebecca Schultz announced the freeze Monday,
00:05:13.800 halting a planned increase to $110 per ton in 2026 and a further rise to $170 per ton by 2030,
00:05:21.800 under the province's Technology Innovation and Emissions Reduction Regulation.
00:05:25.960 Smith said she heard the concerns of business and industry leaders who were warning that further tax
00:05:30.440 hikes would harm Alberta's competitiveness and be detrimental to their businesses.
00:05:34.040 Smith said, quote, Alberta remains committed to reducing emissions through the development and
00:05:39.880 implementation of new technologies, not unrealistically high taxes, while responsibly powering the world
00:05:46.200 for decades to come. Since 2007, Alberta has reduced emissions from the oil sands by over 22%,
00:05:53.080 while simultaneously increasing oil production by 90%. Meanwhile, the province's overall emissions have
00:05:58.840 decreased by about 7.2%. Smith said, quote, if industry told us that any increase past $100 per
00:06:05.960 ton would be harmful, you can imagine what $170 per ton industrial carbon tax would do to our industry.
00:06:11.640 That would be devastating to Alberta's economy. This is yet another example of Ottawa overstepping
00:06:16.840 into our provincial jurisdiction with reckless policies that damage our industry. The Premier explained
00:06:22.360 that the tax freeze would help not just the energy industry, but also agriculture, forestry, petrochemicals,
00:06:28.200 and more. Schultz said energy demand is soaring globally, and the world wants Alberta's resources,
00:06:33.800 but Ottawa's climate agenda has made investment more difficult. Smith pointed to Quebec's lower
00:06:38.760 carbon price as further evidence of unequal treatment under Ottawa's climate framework,
00:06:43.000 and urged the federal government to abandon its ideological approach.
00:06:46.600 So, Cosmin, how has Prime Minister Mark Carney advertised the industrial carbon tax?
00:06:50.840 Has he acknowledged the cost to industries?
00:06:52.600 So, yeah, Jeff, we all recall back during the federal election when Carney suddenly turned around
00:07:00.760 and joined the so-called axe the tax crowd by axing the consumer carbon tax. Or rather,
00:07:08.360 he didn't actually axe it because the legislation is still in effect. That's why we're talking about
00:07:14.120 an industrial carbon tax today. But he reduced the consumer carbon tax to zero,
00:07:20.680 making a big show of it as one of his election promises. But now we see that the problem of the
00:07:29.560 carbon tax has not actually gone away. Because the industrial carbon tax, it essentially affects
00:07:37.240 everything we consume, we purchase at the store, anything that travels using fossil fuels,
00:07:45.080 on a truck, on an airplane, on a vessel, etc. And essentially, Mark Carney has spoken out of both
00:07:54.120 sides of his mouth when it comes to the carbon tax. In an attempt to take some of the popularity or
00:08:01.800 rather the wind out of his conservative opponent during the election, he wanted to position himself
00:08:08.520 as somebody who opposed the carbon tax or at least the consumer carbon tax. But as I just mentioned,
00:08:15.800 the industrial carbon tax is a consumer carbon tax as well because we pay for it at the end of the day.
00:08:22.440 Industries are going to pass on that cost to consumers. But in terms of the way he has essentially advertised
00:08:30.200 it, he's said several things which don't actually stand up to scrutiny. For example, he's called it
00:08:36.200 a competitive edge for industries. When we have business and industry leaders across the country,
00:08:43.800 not only in Alberta, saying that the industrial carbon tax reduces competitiveness, it doesn't
00:08:50.760 actually promote it. And additionally, the industrial carbon tax is set to increase. The federal government
00:08:57.960 has not paused increases on the industrial carbon tax. So in many ways, Carney has attempted to
00:09:04.760 gain favor from the electorate. But now, after the election, after everything is all said and done,
00:09:11.880 we are still left with this industrial carbon tax. It is raising the prices of things. There was a
00:09:18.120 temporary reprieve from that consumer carbon tax reduction, but the prices continue to escalate as the
00:09:26.360 industrial carbon tax also goes up. The British Columbia NDP government has banned non-indigenous
00:09:35.880 Canadians from accessing a provincial park until the end of the week. Joffrey Lakes Provincial Park has
00:09:42.280 been off limits to visitors since April 26th, so local First Nations can, quote, connect with the park,
00:09:48.680 despite it being crown land. Located approximately 35 kilometers east of Pemberton along Highway 99,
00:09:55.960 Joffrey Lakes Provincial Parks is known for its awe-inspiring landscapes and serene ambience. However,
00:10:02.200 BC Park says the park will remain off-limits to recreational visitors until at least May 17th.
00:10:09.560 In a statement released by BC Parks, the agency said the closure aims to, quote,
00:10:14.040 recognize the importance of the Joffrey Lakes Park area to the two indigenous communities
00:10:19.480 and to provide them with dedicated time, quote, to connect with the land. Former BC United candidate
00:10:26.520 Caroline Elliott raised concerns about broader implications in an ex-post on Friday, suggesting
00:10:32.520 the decision to close the park on the basis of, quote, traditional territory could signal a lurch away
00:10:38.760 from the basic principle of Western property rights. Day use access to the park will resume on Saturday,
00:10:45.480 at which point visitors age 12 and up will again be required to book a free day use pass in advance.
00:10:52.600 The decision to restrict non-indigenous access to the park follows the BC government's decision
00:10:58.280 to recognize the Haida Nation's Aboriginal title to all of Haida Gwaii. The agreement signed in April
00:11:05.240 2024 and reconfirmed by the federal government in February, affirms Haida indigenous ownership over
00:11:12.200 the archipelago, including lands, freshwater bodies, and foreshore to the low tide mark.
00:11:19.240 Critics have raised concerns that the decision ignores the property rights of non-indigenous landowners
00:11:25.240 who were not consulted on the land title change. So for those who are not from BC or are not aware of this,
00:11:32.280 essentially the BC government has entered into agreement with the Haida Gwaii First Nations to
00:11:40.120 give them title over the entirety of a massive piece of land. It's a huge piece of land today known as
00:11:48.040 Haida Gwaii and not only the land but the surrounding waters. Now, there has been quite a bit of legal
00:11:56.680 criticism. There hasn't been that many outspoken activists against it because of the sensitivity
00:12:03.160 of the conversation. But there are quite a few legal criticisms, Jeff. And if you could just go through
00:12:09.800 some of the available criticisms to the Haida Gwaii land title claim. Yeah, the BC NDP's closure of
00:12:17.400 Joffrey Lakes Provincial Park to non-indigenous visitors mirrors the controversial Haida Gwaii land title
00:12:23.400 agreement. And the criticisms of that deal shed light on similar tensions. The Haida Nation's
00:12:27.880 Aboriginal title to Haida Gwaii, recognized by the BC government in April 2024 and reaffirmed by
00:12:33.400 the federal government in February, has faced significant pushback. The provincial opposition
00:12:37.560 BC Conservative Party criticized the agreement, arguing it puts private landowners at the mercy
00:12:42.840 of Haida and future Haida indigenous law. They contend that the deal undermines non-indigenous
00:12:47.880 property rights by potentially subjecting the landowners to new governance structures without
00:12:52.600 their input, raising fears of diminished control over their own land. Further criticism centers on
00:12:57.480 the lack of consultation and clarity. While the agreement states existing private
00:13:02.040 while the agreement states existing private property interests will be honored,
00:13:05.320 it still creates uncertainty for non-indigenous residents as the transition process for land and
00:13:10.280 resource management remains undefined. Lawyer Jeffrey Rath, who has also been involved with the Alberta
00:13:14.920 Prosperity Project, echoed this in a Western Standard piece from May 1, arguing that the
00:13:19.960 agreement prioritizes indigenous title over established Western property law principles,
00:13:24.520 potentially setting a precedent for other regions like Joffrey Lakes. Critics, including former BC
00:13:29.720 United candidate Caroline Elliott, fear this reflects a broader trend, where public access and
00:13:34.440 non-indigenous rights are sidelined under the guise of reconciliation, without significant
00:13:38.760 transparency or consideration for all stakeholders. These concerns highlight a tension between indigenous
00:13:43.640 recognition and the perceived erosion of non-indigenous property rights.
00:13:50.360 That's it for today, folks. Thanks for tuning in. You can stay on top of new episodes every weekday
00:13:55.160 by subscribing to The Daily Brief on iTunes and Spotify. Also, while you're at it,
00:14:00.280 make sure to hit us with a five-star rating and please leave a review.