00:00:00.000Albertans who favor independence will have two hurdles to climb now first they'll have to vote
00:00:10.200in favor of holding a referendum and if that succeeds they'll get a chance to vote for
00:00:16.060independence. Premier Danielle Smith has announced she'll be adding the question to
00:00:21.420the upcoming fall referendum scheduled for October the 19th. The additional question will be
00:00:28.160Should Alberta remain a province of Canada? Or should the government of Alberta commence the legal process required under the Canadian Constitution to hold a binding provincial referendum on whether or not Alberta should separate from Canada?
00:00:43.400Now, Smith says she favors Alberta remaining part of Canada, but disagrees with a court decision that quashed a citizen-led independence referendum.
00:00:52.480Now, I want to be clear. I support Alberta remaining in Canada. That is how I would vote on separation in a provincial referendum. It is also the position of my government and my caucus. However, despite my personal support for remaining in Canada, I am deeply troubled by an erroneous court decision that interferes with the democratic rights of hundreds of thousands of Albertans. Alberta's future will be decided by Albertans, not the courts.
00:01:21.200Well, some separatists are not buying it now and are targeting the leadership of Daniel
00:01:26.260Smith, whom they see as standing in the way of independence.
00:01:30.920Prime Minister Carney may have a caucus rebellion to deal with.
00:01:34.760After backsliding on the government's climate goals, 14 liberal MPs have come out in opposition
00:01:41.640to the government, easing its environmental position on Alberta pipeline construction.
00:01:47.040CBC obtained a copy of the letter, but is not releasing the names to protect the signatories.
00:01:53.480It reads, we remain deeply concerned the government's credibility will be seriously compromised.
00:02:01.640Our guest today is pro-independence lawyer Keith Wilson.
00:06:44.580they're not repealed one example the tanker ban still there i could keep going so um i think she
00:06:54.260is now set very high expectations for herself as to what she can achieve with fixing canada
00:07:03.700Yeah, I mean, they did come up with another deal, I suppose, that postponed the level of carbon tax, the industrial carbon tax, I guess, $130 a ton to 2040.
00:07:21.700I think that that was the time, but apparently the industry is still not happy.
00:07:29.480There's still aspects of this that do not please the industry whatsoever.
00:07:34.800And so that is also a factor here, isn't it?
00:07:38.000The fact that if you're going to attract investment into the sector, you've got to make it, you've got to create an environment where money is going to, you know, make a profit.
00:07:51.540Well, and, you know, there's always the delta between political rhetoric and aspirational words from politicians and reality.
00:08:02.500And I'm not seeing any indication that the industry, the people who need to make the investment decisions, agree with the rosy description of affairs.
00:08:16.900you know the the no more pipelines law we talk about bill c69 which was the changes from the
00:08:23.860canadian environment assessment act and they made it into the impact assessment act they put such
00:08:29.420incredibly difficult approval conditions in that legislation it's still there all they did was they
00:08:37.760created this national interest projects office or whatever he calls it where you have to go before
00:08:43.640king carny you know bend a knee bring a gift and say please may i get on the list sir right and
00:08:50.560right now there's like five projects most of which were already approved anyway you know the reality
00:08:55.240from my perspective is that if you and i are going to create a business that's going to create a
00:09:00.160hundred jobs or a business is going to create a thousand jobs or ten thousand jobs you shouldn't
00:09:06.840have to plead to get on a list the government should be encouraging every job creator to create
00:09:12.120the job every investor to be confident to invest and none of those fundamentals have changed we've
00:09:17.080created these new add-on processes of technocratic control controlled by carney his central banker
00:09:23.080mentality i guess the wording of the question suggests to me that there may be some confusion
00:09:30.760when people see it written out in front of them they're going to think that they're voting for a
00:09:35.240a referendum, because the first part talks about, you know, for those who support Alberta being part
00:09:42.060of Canada, and then it goes on, and if you don't, you know, there's the referendum, but there's,
00:09:48.920I suspect, a lot of Albertans who maybe are on the fence about independence, maybe want some time
00:09:57.120to think about it. There might even be some people who lean towards federalism, but yet still want a
00:10:03.940referendum because they want the question put forth and for the people to
00:10:08.620decide. Do you have any issues around that? I mean,
00:10:11.460do you think that some people might be confused by the wording of the question?
00:10:17.440What they should have done when they ruled this out was they should have showed
00:10:20.760the answer choices. Cause obviously you can't say yes or no to this, you know,
00:10:24.880would you like coffee or tea? Yes. Okay. Which one? Right.
00:10:29.260So that looks that way. So what's missing and will appear
00:10:33.180is you'll see the question on the ballot and then it'll go, A, stay in Canada, B,
00:10:40.260commence independence referendum, right? So you'll be very clear where your coffee or tea,
00:10:47.380you say coffee. So that's point number one. But here's, think about this, and I can say this
00:10:53.080quite concisely, and I think it'll be illuminating. Imagine two scenarios. We know as a starting
00:11:00.480point, we know right now that if the referendum were held today, it would not pass. And there's
00:11:06.64030 to 40% of Albertans that would vote yes, but there's 60 or more percent that are strongly
00:11:12.660opposed to independence. But within that 60%, there's a large group that are very angry at
00:11:19.020Ottawa and have very serious concerns about the direction of Canada and how Alberta is being
00:11:24.500treated in the future for their kids and their grandkids. So if you give that person in that
00:11:29.140category that is strongly opposed to independence, but it's really concerned about the direction of
00:11:34.940the country and what Ottawa is doing. If you give them scenario A, where all they can decide is stay
00:11:40.280or leave, then you give them scenario B, where it's stay or commence the process for a referendum.
00:11:48.520A lot of those people will vote, commence a process for a referendum because it'll give,
00:11:54.220they'll see it as building additional pressure on ottawa to change they'll see and they won't
00:12:01.180feel you see what i'm saying it's not a harsh as harsh of a choice uh so i think this could
00:12:07.100actually play to the advantage of those of us in the independence movement if we play our cards
00:12:11.100right that um will it'll become a bridge to us to reach those folks who are very concerned about
00:12:20.380canada and alberta's place in it but not ready to say i want to leave so it gives us a chance to
00:12:27.500to warm them up i have a lot of friends of mine who are absolutely stay right now but
00:12:35.100they are so concerned about what's ottawa's doing in the future for kids and grandkids and so on
00:12:39.900uh i i pulled some of them today and i said i gave them scenario b scenario a they would vote to
00:12:45.580stay i said what about this one they said i definitely vote for the referendum because it