Juno News - April 06, 2024


Alberta takes firm stance against Trudeau’s gun grab


Episode Stats


Length

8 minutes

Words per minute

186.2283

Word count

1,620

Sentence count

87


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

The Canadian Coalition for Firearms Rights (CCFR) has been fighting the federal government for years to allow more powers to be granted to the provinces regarding firearms licensing and regulation. Now, the CCFR has joined forces with Alberta and Saskatchewan in their fight against the Liberal government. In this episode of the Andrew Lawton Show, we talk to Rod Giltaka, the Executive Director of CCFR, about why provinces are standing up for their citizens.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
00:00:00.000 You're tuned in to the Andrew Lawton Show.
00:00:08.880 Provinces often have taken the view that, oh well, firearms law is criminal, it's federal,
00:00:14.480 but provinces have a fair bit of authority on there, whether it's a loophole or explicit
00:00:20.560 rights you could debate and discuss. But when Alberta said that it would not use police
00:00:25.300 resources to go after firearms, the federal government was kind of screwed because they
00:00:31.020 didn't have another card to play. All they could do was finger wag, and I would say, all right,
00:00:35.400 finger wag all day long. Rod Giltaka is joining us once again. He's the executive director of the
00:00:40.840 Canadian Coalition for Firearm Rights. Yeah, Rod, this must be a bit conflicting for you too,
00:00:46.100 because on one hand, you're a taxpayer paying for this program, but on the other hand,
00:00:49.800 your guns are still safe for now. Well, we're certainly in good company with everyone that's
00:00:54.420 angry about a Rive scam as well, right? So everyone is feeling the taxpayer pinch when it
00:01:01.700 comes to the liberals' incompetence and their corruption. Yeah, it's going to be like ARCAN
00:01:07.860 is the new government app where you have to log your AR-15s and whatnot. But let me talk to you
00:01:14.180 first and foremost about the provincial response here, because oftentimes, I think even firearms
00:01:19.600 advocates have many, it seems like, really just focused on the federal government. And if you get
00:01:25.280 a liberal government like we have now that's very hostile to gun owners, they kind of just say,
00:01:29.080 all right, well, we're in for a rocky ride here. But this has been a relatively recent advent,
00:01:33.380 it seemed like, where provinces are really stepping up their game and saying no to this.
00:01:37.880 Well, they are stepping up their game, at least. Alberta and Saskatchewan have lined up behind the CCFR
00:01:45.100 and the other applicants in our lawsuit. We're in the appeals process right now. And they are stepping
00:01:50.320 up as interveners. So we're really happy to not be going it alone. And those two provinces are really
00:01:58.320 making a statement, I think, for their citizens. And they're saying, you know, what the federal
00:02:03.400 government is doing is unreasonable, not only just in the firearms file, right, but in this case,
00:02:07.700 you know, about guns. And we're not going to stand for it because, you know, we work for you.
00:02:12.540 So I don't know, I like I say, I'm really happy that we're not standing alone. I'm really happy
00:02:18.100 that governments are doing things in the interest of their citizens. And yeah, we're really happy.
00:02:24.460 I've had on the show, Alberta's chief firearms officer, Terry Bryant, who's been like just a
00:02:29.520 tremendous advocate for the sport and a tremendous administrator as well. When I was, you know, waiting
00:02:35.080 like four months for my handgun to clear, Alberta was like processing these things in like in like a
00:02:40.520 week, it seemed like. Now we have in Saskatchewan, a new CFO appointed. I don't know if you've had
00:02:45.660 any dealings with Murray Cowan before. I think we're going to have him on the show next week.
00:02:50.500 But what are your expectations there from what Saskatchewan's doing with that firearms office?
00:02:55.700 Well, my expectations are they're going to continue on doing the great things that they're doing. I had
00:02:59.540 the opportunity to spend a couple of hours with Robert Freeberg, who was their CFO in Saskatchewan,
00:03:08.040 who is now the commissioner of the Saskatchewan Firearms Office. And I tell you, it's just here's
00:03:15.000 a bureaucrat that is thoughtful. And I think the most important thing is he doesn't believe that
00:03:20.820 he's at war with his own citizens and in particular people that would subject themselves to the process
00:03:26.740 of obtaining and maintaining a firearms license. So they've done, I think, in that province,
00:03:33.840 as well as Alberta, focused on the most important aspects of the firearms office or the duties of
00:03:38.800 the CFO, which is to increase compliance with the act and regulations and work towards increased
00:03:46.040 public safety. That's really the mandate, not in enforcement and prosecution of licensed gun owners,
00:03:54.440 which is what the federal government right now is focused on.
00:03:58.220 So, you know, at the end of the day, we think that owning firearms legally is really important
00:04:05.520 and that there's a regulatory framework around that and ensuring the public is safe as a, you know,
00:04:12.040 in light of that, but focusing on where violent crime really comes from, which is gangs.
00:04:17.540 There's a domestic violence aspect to it. And it's a lot of that stuff is fueled.
00:04:21.800 Almost all of it is fueled by smuggling and illegal manufacturing.
00:04:24.540 Now, when we talk about provinces appointing their own CFOs, just to go back to the civics
00:04:29.780 of this for a moment, what is it that a CFO can do differently? Because yes, the core regulations,
00:04:36.180 the core law is federal, but we see wildly different experiences in different provinces
00:04:40.680 depending on their CFO. So what is it that they can really do that is more favorable to people like
00:04:46.420 you and I? Well, in the case of Saskatchewan, they passed their own firearms act and what it did.
00:04:52.860 So I'll give you one example. It's quite complicated. I don't claim to know everything,
00:04:58.620 but I'll give you one example. In the Firearms Act, if you store your firearm in a way that is
00:05:04.780 in contravention with the Firearms Act, it's a criminal offense. It triggers a criminal code
00:05:09.940 charge immediately. So that will basically, for a law-abiding citizen, destroy their lives.
00:05:15.720 Basically, it's a weapons charge. And that might be as, you know, as innocuous as, you know,
00:05:21.220 my guns are in the safe, but I may not have, or in a locked case, but I may not have put a secure
00:05:26.800 locking device on the firearm or I forgot that. Or I left a magazine in a gun, in a gun safe.
00:05:31.560 Like those are, those result in life destroying criminal charges. So Saskatchewan has said,
00:05:36.380 you know what, maybe it's, maybe it's a case of making sure people are in compliance and providing
00:05:42.800 education and some motivation for them to make sure that they're storing their firearms correctly.
00:05:48.180 And in the case of, let's say, handguns, these are, these are registered firearms held by people
00:05:53.480 that get a criminal record check every single day electronically. Right. So this is not, this is not
00:05:58.380 a criminal enterprise. So that's, so what the, what the Firearms Saskatchewan Firearms Act does is it
00:06:03.560 takes that offense that was a federal criminal offense in the criminal code and turns it into
00:06:08.300 a regulatory offense. So they'll face a fine or maybe even seizure of their firearms until they
00:06:12.960 take a course or what have you. So there's, there's reasonable remedial action in incorporated into that
00:06:19.560 and people don't get their lives destroyed for an administrative oversight. So these are some of
00:06:25.260 the things that a, a forward thinking, reasonable chief firearms officer can get going in their own
00:06:31.380 province and, and, you know, reside, reside over a regime that's far more reasonable and proportionate.
00:06:37.380 I would say.
00:06:37.980 You mentioned the lawsuit that the Saskatchewan and Alberta governments have joined as interveners.
00:06:44.580 Now, I should say when you're David going up against Goliath, you know, an organization, which,
00:06:49.380 you know, may be a very robust organization, but you're going up against the government. It's good to
00:06:52.980 know at least you have some governments on your side, at least in some way here. So that's in the appeal.
00:06:57.700 What's the, what's the essence of the argument on this case? Well, probably the most important one
00:07:03.140 is the administrative aspect of our argument. So in the criminal code, it's clearly says that the
00:07:08.900 government can't ban firearms that are appropriate for hunting and sporting use. And it's, it was written
00:07:15.220 in there for a reason. It's not an accident that it's in there. The government decides, well, you know
00:07:19.060 what, we're going to violate that. And we think we had the administrative authority just to override the
00:07:23.860 criminal code using an order in council. We're not even going to, you know, we're not going to need
00:07:27.860 legislation or anything for that kind of stuff. We're just going to do it, especially when it's
00:07:31.700 on the heels of something like the spree shooting in Nova Scotia. That's they thought, well, you know
00:07:36.660 what, nobody's going to, nobody's going to push back against us and we're just going to do this thing.
00:07:41.460 So we sued the government for that reason. The federal court judge in the case said, oh yeah,
00:07:48.020 well, the government can pretty much do whatever it wants, even if it's doesn't have the authority
00:07:52.740 to do what it's supposed to do. We disagree with that ruling or our legal team, which is one of the
00:07:58.660 best in the country said we should have won on this. There's no reason why we should have lost.
00:08:03.540 There are a lot of independent people out there that said you absolutely should have won this.
00:08:07.860 We're appealing it because we might think we might suppose there's all kinds of monkey business
00:08:12.740 going on there. And at least we have the Department of Justice in two Canadian provinces
00:08:17.380 that agree we should have won that administrative aspect. So they're lining up behind us.
00:08:22.180 So, you know, it was the government overstepping its authority. Not the first time we saw this
00:08:27.860 government doing that, but hopefully we get a proper resolution this time.
00:08:31.220 All right. Well, we'll keep our eyes peeled on that as it works its way through the process.
00:08:34.820 Rod Giltaka, always a pleasure, sir. Thanks for coming on.
00:08:37.940 Thank you.