Andrew Lawton and Joe Oliver on Justin Trudeau’s broken balanced budget promise
Episode Stats
Words per minute
144.8621
Harmful content
Hate speech
1
sentences flagged
Summary
In this episode, former Finance Minister Joe Oliver joins me to talk about the challenges facing Canada's economy and the need for a balanced budget. We discuss the challenges of balancing the books, the effects of high interest rates, and the role of the federal government in stimulating the economy.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
And very pleased to be joined by the former Minister of Finance for Canada, the Honourable
00:00:14.080
So one of the big themes, and you're talking about this at the Manning Conference this
00:00:16.920
year, the idea of really this fiscal situation we find ourselves in in Canada.
00:00:22.560
We had a budget that is probably not surprising in an election year, just giving out money
00:00:30.460
But one question that I think has come up a lot in political discussions, are the minute
00:00:36.720
details that matter to you as a former finance minister, that matter to policy wonks, are
00:00:41.000
these things that actually resonate with Canadians, that fiscal health of the country when it
00:00:46.400
Well, this is, of course, one of the challenges.
00:00:52.360
The problem is, of course, we don't want to be in a crisis, and you have to prevent
00:00:57.480
a crisis by being prudent over the longer term.
00:01:02.160
And unfortunately, that's not what's happening.
00:01:05.640
As you recall, I was, if you're old enough to remember and nostalgic enough to care, I
00:01:13.520
was the first one to present a balanced budget in some period of time, and the Liberal government
00:01:24.480
coming in made sure that that year's budget turned into a deficit budget.
00:01:31.020
The first 11 months were all in surplus, and it totaled about $7.5 billion, and so in the
00:01:37.020
last month they put in well over $9 billion to substantiate their pretense that they were
00:01:51.840
As you recall, the Liberals said in their platform they would start with a modest $10 billion budget,
00:02:00.480
they would never go above that, and then by 2019 they'd be in surplus.
00:02:06.520
Of course, right now there have been a series of large, much larger deficits, and there
00:02:16.920
The consequences of that can be particularly dire if we encounter a downturn, which of course
00:02:24.040
is inevitable and most economists think will happen in the next year or two.
00:02:28.920
When that occurs, automatic stabilizers go into operation, which means costs go up, revenue
00:02:37.580
is already down because it's a downturn, and then there's a political tendency to stimulate
00:02:43.740
even more so that a $20 billion deficit, which is what the current budget envisages, could easily
00:02:57.040
So that's when you get into severe problems, and at that point the public will become aware
00:03:03.840
In the meantime, the challenge is to tell them what the problems are ongoing.
00:03:09.500
And one of the consequences of deficit financing is that your interest payments continue to increase.
00:03:23.600
If you combine federal, provincial, and municipal debt, the total interest payment per capita
00:03:35.520
That means the average person is paying over $1,700 a year just for interest.
00:03:41.380
They're getting nothing for it, but of course it's an obligation.
00:03:45.000
So you start $1,700 behind, and of course those who are in the middle class or upper middle
00:03:57.700
In addition to that, when you have more government spending, you crowd out the private sector,
00:04:04.320
and you inhibit growth, because to the extent you have to pay tens of billions or hundreds
00:04:12.180
of billions of dollars in debt, then of course that eats away at growth, which at the end
00:04:19.840
of the day reduces revenue to the government, so there's sort of a vicious cycle that comes
00:04:30.140
The challenge is to communicate that in a convincing way to the public, which is difficult to do,
00:04:42.020
because in a lot of cases they think this is kind of an arcane sort of subject, so you
00:04:46.300
somehow have to get it down to a level where they can see how it impacts them, and it's
00:04:57.120
Yes, and I think that when you talk about the forecasting here, obviously just last week
00:05:04.240
You had a forecasted recession that was impacting and putting a lot of pessimism there, and I
00:05:09.880
know that when it comes to stimulating the economy, which is sometimes controversial because
00:05:15.060
spending and investing look differently to some people and look the same to others, but
00:05:19.780
does the money that Justin Trudeau is pumping into Canada, in his view, through this budget,
00:05:27.460
I mean, with what you're seeing in this budget, does this actually stimulate anything?
00:05:33.600
They started by saying, you know, we're in a period of slower growth, we've got to stimulate
00:05:41.460
Well, you can't indefinitely spend more than you earn and expect that to continually raise
00:05:50.040
up the growth rate because the more you do it, the more interest you pay and the more
00:06:01.320
They also said, well, it's a period of low interest rates, we need critical infrastructure,
00:06:07.680
let's spend it on infrastructure because that has a long-term value.
00:06:12.080
The problem is they haven't really been spending it on this kind of infrastructure that would
00:06:16.800
have a long-term value, and a lot of it has gone to social spending, however, you know,
00:06:24.080
And that creates a problem because it's really a current expenditure, which becomes entrenched.
00:06:30.300
So then you have a structural deficit built into your fiscal framework, and it's extraordinarily
00:06:49.340
The so-called multiplier effect that they claim they would get out of government spending
00:06:56.300
that, you know, if they put in a dollar, it'll generate more, is economically unsound, and
00:07:01.060
the Bank of Canada has said that a smaller economy with a floating currency and open trade doesn't
00:07:14.340
really benefit from the multiplier effect that the liberal government claims to be in place.
00:07:24.900
So I mean, part of it is where they've chosen to spend the money, and part of it is, of course,
00:07:30.360
the total amount that they've chosen to spend, and in both cases, they've created longer-term problems.
00:07:36.600
And then, of course, there's a moral issue, which is that no family would want to saddle
0.98
00:07:43.360
their children with debt for expenses they've incurred for their own enjoyment, and no country
00:07:51.800
Yeah, and that actually ties into, I think, the very valid point you made at the beginning
00:07:56.540
of this, which is that people need to understand that relationship between how the government's
00:08:01.700
managing its finances and how a household manages theirs, and no household could be afloat if
00:08:09.380
And I guess that's where I get very pessimistic on this, because we went from Justin Trudeau
00:08:14.760
saying there's going to be that little tiny deficit that I know the former Prime Minister
00:08:17.820
Stephen Harper made fun of, I think, very effectively, and then this has become, okay, you know,
00:08:23.680
And now it's not even like they're kicking the can to a particular point.
00:08:29.560
And one thing we've seen from, I think, Justin Trudeau and Bill Morneau is this idea that
00:08:34.020
when the economy's going well, we can afford to spend, and when the economy's not going
00:08:40.240
And I'm waiting for the scenario where no spending is required.
00:08:43.380
When you don't, you know, and if it's just moving along, that's a, you know, the Keynesian,
00:08:51.000
I mean, Keynes would be rolling in his grave, because, you know, he felt that expenditures
00:08:55.200
should be undertaken when there's a downturn, not when you're in a period of growth.
00:09:01.480
And let's face it, it's not only Conservatives that have sometimes missed the message.
00:09:07.300
In Alberta, when oil was at $100 a barrel, they were spending more than they were earning,
00:09:19.880
But on that question, though, of Alberta, I mean, do you think we as a country have
00:09:25.680
to move beyond being resource dependent, or do you think we already have from an economic
00:09:31.160
Well, from an economic perspective, the bulk, I mean, the oil and gas industry is very
00:09:40.840
I mean, oil and gas represents 10% of the GDP, so we're pretty diversified.
00:09:45.960
But the tragedy, of course, is that, you know, we're landlocked, and we have no access to
00:09:53.640
We're paying an immense discount to the international price when we export our oil and gas to the
00:10:05.080
It reached a high of about $40 billion on an annualized basis.
00:10:09.640
And there's, I don't know, 150,000 people in Alberta who were formerly employed in the
00:10:23.200
There's national security implications and so on.
00:10:26.500
And, you know, it's all because we haven't been able to build a pipeline that would transport
00:10:32.840
our oil and gas to Tidewater in the east and the west.
00:10:36.320
That's one of the structural impediments to more robust growth.
00:10:43.680
So, you know, no one is saying that we shouldn't be focusing on technology and manufacturing and
00:10:54.720
We've been enormously blessed with the third largest proven oil reserves in the entire world.
00:11:01.240
And we are the fourth biggest producer of natural gas in the world.
00:11:08.260
You know, we've got 171 billion barrels of proven oil.
00:11:13.300
And I think it's 415 trillion cubic feet of natural gas.
00:11:22.560
It's because government policy, government regulation and opposition to the development
00:11:29.240
of our resources has put an industry on its back, an industry that should be flourishing
00:11:34.900
for the benefit not only of Alberta, but the entire country.
00:11:39.160
And it's forgotten how much Alberta contributes.
00:11:49.480
And, you know, and Quebec is the inverse of that.
00:11:59.520
You're killing the goose that laid the golden egg.
00:12:05.180
And it's hurting people first in Alberta, but right across the country.
00:12:10.760
It's hurting blue-collar workers and the economically disadvantaged.
00:12:16.820
And that's why I think it's profoundly immoral.
00:12:20.780
One last question then, Joe, and that is on trade.
00:12:23.920
I know that it was a point of pride for the government in which you were a part,
00:12:29.940
And even ones that weren't as high profile, that were very significant.
00:12:33.600
And when you look at, ultimately, the biggest trade deal of Justin Trudeau's premiership,
00:12:39.120
which is the replacement to NAFTA, the USMCA, or we're supposed to call it the CMUSA,
00:12:44.580
or whatever it is, this deal, is it one that you think will deal with the issues that were in NAFTA?
00:12:52.580
Well, first of all, it hasn't been signed in the United States.
00:13:07.820
They don't want to give a victory to President Trump,
00:13:11.760
but they've got other things that they care about more.
00:13:17.980
In the meantime, of course, there's still tariffs on steel and aluminum.
00:13:23.420
I think, you know, it wasn't a great deal, but it was better than no deal.
00:13:39.180
And, you know, one is that we're going to need permission from the United States
00:13:45.420
to enter into a deal with a non-market economy.
00:13:50.620
Now, I'm certainly not one to argue that we need to have or should have a free trade deal with China.
00:14:01.280
And, of course, the best thing we could possibly do is get the pipelines built
00:14:14.740
Just get it to market because there is a strategic complementarity between Canada and China on this issue.
00:14:25.560
They want to diversify their sources of supply.
00:14:29.160
So it's, you know, and I was there and I spoke actually directly to the President of China, Xi Jinping,
00:14:40.540
But after a while, you know, they're not interested anymore because we simply can't deliver.
00:14:47.860
I think the trade deal is our right, but we should focus right now as much as we can on trade diversification.
00:15:00.620
We don't want to be dependent, quite as dependent.
00:15:05.260
But, you know, since Justin Trudeau's father talked about a third way, and, you know, what happened?
00:15:14.020
Well, there's been more and more focus on the U.S. market.
00:15:19.440
Now, I think 76% of our trade goes to the United States, and it's highly asymmetrical, as we know.