Andrew Scheer on leadership, social conservatism, and future of the Conservatives
Episode Stats
Words per minute
205.23112
Harmful content
Hate speech
2
sentences flagged
Summary
In this episode of The Andrew Lawton Show, the former opposition leader of Her Majesty's Loyal Opposition and the outgoing leader of the Conservative Party of Canada, the Honorable Andrew Scheindler, talks about his time as opposition leader, the opioid pandemic, and the role of the opposition in Canada.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
welcome to canada's most irreverent talk show this is the andrew lawton show brought to you by true
00:00:09.800
north the andrew lawton show starts right now i'm sitting down with the outgoing leader of her
00:00:24.040
majesty's loyal opposition and of the conservative party of canada the honorable andrew sheer it's
00:00:29.360
good to talk to you again in person thank you very much for taking the time absolutely andrew it's
00:00:33.160
it's great that we can do this again and uh thanks very much for uh all your work and covering public
00:00:38.320
affairs here in canada well thank you i appreciate that you have had as far as what anyone could
00:00:43.220
expect in their final few months in your role probably the most eventful few months and not
00:00:48.980
just in terms of the political season in canada being kind of busy but also the importance of
00:00:54.320
having an opposition being strengthened how was that for you compared to when you first stepped
00:00:59.080
down to what really ended up dominating the last few months of your tenure well uh you're right you
00:01:05.100
know when when the covid pandemic hit it really changed everything it changed everything for a lot
00:01:08.860
of canadians unfortunately many people have suffered either with their health or with their businesses or
00:01:14.480
with their jobs and so it really did change the dynamic when we were planning kind of in january about
00:01:19.800
how best to leave the party and and and you know visits with some of the regions and some of the
00:01:26.040
people who have helped in the past uh that all changed when the pandemic hit and uh i never thought
00:01:32.100
i'd have to fight to get parliament to sit you know that that we take that so often for granted
00:01:37.740
as canadians that parliament will sit the house of commons will will function and yet here we were
00:01:43.480
thrust into this crisis because as early as april the the liberals were clearly signaling that they
00:01:49.020
wanted to govern this country through a pandemic without parliamentary oversight and we had to
00:01:52.940
work very very hard to fight to get what we did in terms of some kind of house of commons operation
00:01:58.460
to provide that oversight and uh i was proud of our team and proud of our efforts to make sure that
00:02:03.320
that the value of our parliamentary institutions were were defended during this pandemic anytime
00:02:09.580
parliamentarians have gone on a summer break or a winter break the narrative is always that
00:02:14.220
you know if an emergency happens they can all come back and we were in that emergency situation
00:02:18.880
and you're right there was this resistance to coming back and we saw that the government really
00:02:23.480
tried to circumvent the parliamentary process and the opposition pushed for that and even as the
00:02:28.960
pandemic has continued and as various government spending programs and such have come out the
00:02:33.280
opposition has been there at the same time i'm curious if you think there needs to be a re-evaluation
00:02:38.620
of the role of the opposition in canada because certainly anytime the opposition has held the
00:02:44.600
government to account we've then gotten from the government criticisms of polarization and of
00:02:48.860
violating what you had termed early on a so-called team canada approach well yeah you're right to
00:02:54.740
point that out uh back in late march early april the the liberals were saying hey let's all have a
00:03:00.600
team canada approach let's sit down and and and and meet and and develop programs to respond to the
00:03:06.360
pandemic we took them at their word we we started proposing concrete solutions act you know substantive
00:03:12.060
amendments to their programs we were aware of people falling through the gaps and we took them
00:03:17.140
at their word too when they said that if we if we pass the legislation quickly they would fix it after
00:03:22.800
the fact we agreed with them that said in order to get help out the door let's get the programs up and
00:03:27.540
running get help out to as many people as we can and then we'll make fixes as we go it's august and
00:03:33.320
they still haven't made the changes to the wage subsidy to the the uh small business loan programs
00:03:38.720
uh the serb people are still falling through crack here we are in august so um i don't know if we need
1.00
00:03:44.560
to rethink the role of the opposition but i think uh the opposition needs to find ways uh and and as
00:03:51.420
parliamentarians we all need to find ways to ensure that the part of the opposition voices are heard
00:03:56.240
and that their proposals are actually taken into account uh when when we're being criticized of
00:04:03.120
of being partisan when we're pointing out you know objective problems with their with their programs
00:04:08.340
it makes it more difficult for us to do a job and then that makes it more difficult for canes to get
00:04:12.760
better programs and you add to the general checks and balance checks and balances of the government
00:04:18.920
and their policies and you take the we scandal and throw that into the mix and now it's not just about
00:04:23.760
making sure that this program is working and that program is working but but a true accountability
00:04:28.900
issue and a transparency issue and i'm curious for you if this was something that kind of frustrated
00:04:36.200
you not just as a canadian and as a conservative but as someone who is running against this party and
00:04:40.860
this prime minister in the last election to really have a lot of what the conservatives have been saying
00:04:45.320
about justin trudeau vindicated after the election with them re-elected yeah well you know uh during
00:04:50.400
the the the english language debate the only debate in english that justin trudeau showed up for
00:04:56.020
i told him that he was a phony and a fraud he didn't deserve to govern this country and that may
0.63
00:05:02.280
have been the truest statement i ever made in my political career and for him to use the pandemic as
00:05:08.540
cover to reward his friends you know it's it's it's normal for liberals to to to aspire to power to
00:05:16.040
reward their friends that's that's their it's really the raison d'etre if you look at their
00:05:19.940
entire history that's kind of what they do uh just drew to promise to be better he promised to do
00:05:25.140
things differently he said sunlight was the best disinfectant and then we see the hypocrisy of using
00:05:30.520
the cover of the pandemic to help his friends who were in trouble an organization that was in
00:05:34.700
financial trouble he used canadian taxpayers dollars to reward to bail out an organization that
00:05:40.460
provided provided him a massive political uh uh platform and uh i found that just just disgusting
00:05:46.560
you know uh we have disagreements on policy issues you know they think option a would work better than
00:05:51.060
our proposal when you're using your office the power that you canes have entrusted in you in a
00:05:58.220
moment like this that was just absolutely disgusting when you were putting that message to canadians in
00:06:03.840
the election and canadians still despite the conservatives getting more votes than the liberals under our
00:06:08.340
system of government in our system of elections they elected the liberals again what does that say
00:06:13.000
the canadians were willing to reward with all that had happened up until october keeping in mind they
00:06:17.920
didn't know what was going to happen since but but with a lot of what you had put forward and what people
00:06:21.820
knew prior to then what do you think it says that he got this mandate well look uh i think we have to
00:06:27.200
kind of take a step back and look at where we were in 2015 and after the 2015 election the the
00:06:33.600
conventional media narrative was that justin trudeau is going to win the next two or three elections
00:06:38.040
no problem you know majority governments for a decade was what we were facing with we had gone
00:06:42.600
from majority government to opposition they went from third to first we were wiped out in atlantic
00:06:47.160
canada so i i view the last election we fell short of our goals but major accomplishments major gains in
00:06:54.920
atlantic canada major gains in british columbia on the whole up in ontario it was tough to lose some
00:07:01.320
of the seats that we had in ontario but on the whole we were we were net positive virtually sweeping
00:07:06.700
the prairies i i when you look at a first-term majority government it's very rare in canadian
00:07:12.060
history that a first-term majority government would would lose government so bringing them to
00:07:15.900
a minority seeing several high-profile cabinet ministers lose their seat uh seeing us regain
00:07:21.500
our foothold in lantic canada there is a tremendous amount to build on there and i'm very very encouraged
00:07:25.900
by the results of the last election and every confidence that our next leader whoever that may be
00:07:31.020
is going to be able to build on that foundation and finish the job i was there in regina the night
00:07:36.140
of the election when you gave what sounded in many cases like a victory speech you talked about some
00:07:40.140
of the themes that you just brought up now i was also there the next morning when you indicated you
00:07:44.620
were staying on as leader and talked about wanting to make some more of these gains how do you feel
00:07:49.500
that it's not you that's going to build on that well um i recognize that this party has never been about
00:07:57.260
one person you know we're conservatives aren't about the cult of personality we don't look for
00:08:02.220
a promised one uh like the liberals do and make it all about their leader we are a movement that's
00:08:08.140
built on principles values freedom individual liberty free market economics uh democratic reform
00:08:16.540
those principles are bigger than any one person and at the end of the day i just want to see canada
00:08:21.500
be the best country it can be so if it's not me but i can play a role in helping someone else finish
00:08:26.380
that job i will be thrilled uh on election night in the next election if we're able to be successful
00:08:31.740
and uh i'm happy to contribute any way i can it's been an honor to serve as leader and uh and i am
00:08:38.300
really grateful for that opportunity it's uh but you know i've never let this be about me it's about
00:08:44.300
what we're trying to accomplish i'm going to do everything i can to make sure that the next leader of
00:08:48.060
the party becomes prime minister but at first you did think it was going to be you seeing it through
00:08:52.700
not just as a an opposition leader but as a future prime minister or someone that would be heading
00:08:57.980
into another election as conservative leader i know that there were some dynamics in the party
00:09:02.460
that we'll we'll talk about uh soon but but what changed in your mind at what point did it become
00:09:07.660
apparent to you that you were not the one that could stay on and complete that mission well you
00:09:13.740
know in the early days keeping in mind that we always knew when i when i ran for leader in 2016 2017
00:09:20.940
we knew that often in game politics it it takes more than one crack at it you know you you you
00:09:27.500
make gains you build on those gains it's very very common for opposition leaders at the provincial or
00:09:32.220
federal level to uh to have a two-step process we think back to 2004 2006 with the previous conservative
00:09:39.500
leader with many examples at the provincial level uh so that that was my intention to say okay we
00:09:45.500
understand that we have to find out what we can do better and make some improvements but by and
00:09:49.900
large there was a a great deal to be optimistic about what happened in the next few weeks was
00:09:54.540
really just the realization of of what that would mean on my family side and when i ran for leader
00:10:00.860
my wife and i you know talked about how we would manage that how we would uh balance both the the demands
00:10:07.580
of being a father and being leader and uh but you can't really plan for it until you start doing it
00:10:12.860
and i just it was just uh becoming more and more apparent to me that with the way my family had
00:10:20.940
had had developed and and you know going you know getting older for those three years having a couple
00:10:25.980
of teenagers now and and uh all the things i had missed and looking at the next few months uh that that
00:10:32.860
laid ahead of me i just didn't see how i could keep that balance uh going and uh i i made a commitment to
00:10:40.620
jill when i proposed to her that i would always put her first and put my family first no matter what
00:10:45.100
and it just got to that point where i realized that it was best for the party if i if i if i took
00:10:50.700
that step back because if i couldn't give the party a hundred percent i had to hold something back
00:10:55.100
because i had to make sure that my family was okay and it wasn't fair to my caucus colleagues and
00:11:00.140
the rest of the party that i would not give them that hundred percent so i'm very much at peace with
00:11:04.380
that decision because i i know it was the right decision to make and that's really it's really
00:11:09.500
came down to you know i had a couple conversations with my kids i had one with my son kind of late
00:11:13.740
at night we were both getting snacks at the same time we ended up chatting for almost an hour and in
00:11:18.780
that conversation i just realized how much he had grown up in the past three years and i was finding
00:11:22.860
things out about him that i didn't know just in that conversation i just thought you know i've missed
00:11:26.780
a lot and i don't know if i can ask them if i can put them through that again and so i'm very much at peace
00:11:33.180
with that decision did you feel like you were able to be the andrew shear you wanted to be during
00:11:39.500
the election because it seems to me and to a lot of people that i've heard from that there was a
00:11:43.740
market shift in pre-election andrew shear to election share and then also post-election share
00:11:50.220
and it seems like you were a lot more restrained and i don't mean that in a way that you're bombastic
00:11:55.500
or radical or anything outside of the election but you were a lot more restrained and a lot of people
00:12:00.140
didn't feel like your personality sean is that something that you would view as a fair assessment
00:12:04.460
i think there's definitely something to that uh it's it's a normal human beings don't communicate
00:12:10.220
the way politicians do you know like you know normally you want to say something pick up the
00:12:14.140
phone you help with your friend we have to communicate through different filters you know we
00:12:17.980
have to speak to journalists we have to do interviews we have to put content on social media and
00:12:23.500
and so there i think over time you know you are trying to refine a message you are trying to
00:12:30.620
simplify a message stay focused on a message and sometimes over time you can it suddenly becomes well
00:12:36.060
this isn't really how you would put it or this isn't how what you act what your actual take on something
00:12:41.020
is and i i do think you know in retrospect if i look back uh uh i just you know i think of some of
00:12:47.260
the things that i've said or done after i announced i was stepping down when the pressure's off a
00:12:51.900
little bit nothing to lose yeah you know yes let andrew be andrew you know and and uh sometimes i
00:12:56.860
kind of feel yeah geez i wonder if we could have done more of that you know that there's you know
00:13:01.260
you do want to you know polish a message and and and and make sure that there's a clear contrast between
00:13:07.580
your party and the other guys so there's a need for that but sometimes i did think that uh in looking
00:13:12.940
back that maybe i wasn't always able to connect in a in an authentic way that and let my my own
00:13:18.940
personality come through because i think that's what canadians i think all voters are looking for
00:13:22.540
that and that's one of the things you know challenged myself and did i always was i always
00:13:27.180
able to do that and you know i i think there's something to be said for sometimes just throwing
00:13:32.220
away the notes and and uh and just you know saying saying what comes in your head i know you've been
00:13:38.220
deliberately neutral throughout the conservative leadership race and i won't ask you to betray that
00:13:42.460
tempting as it is but in a more general sense what is it that you feel the next conservative
00:13:47.180
leader needs to embody or what's something that you think they need to learn or could learn from
00:13:51.820
your experience and your time as leader well there's there's a few things there i think
00:13:55.900
first and foremost uh the new leader has to has to not take party unity for granted you know we are
00:14:03.420
a party that has a long history of breaking apart coming together reforming you know different
00:14:09.260
iterations of the conservative party have existed throughout our history so it takes an effort we can't
00:14:14.220
take any part of our of our party for granted uh we have to have a leader that always shows respect
00:14:19.900
to the different kinds of conservatives that help our candidates get elected that believe in our party
00:14:24.140
that keep it going strong so making it a conscious effort to make sure every member of our party and
00:14:29.580
by member i mean card holder and member front feels valued and respected and has a has an opportunity
00:14:34.940
to voice their concerns that's that's going to be essential secondly they're going to have to find a way to
00:14:41.020
connect in some of the areas that that we weren't successful in in the last election so whether
00:14:44.460
that's a a regional message or just a different way to to reach out to you know gta uh residents
00:14:51.180
versus where we've had success uh that's certainly going to be a focus but perhaps even larger than
00:14:57.100
that i think there's a big problem facing the world and the next leader conservative party here is going
00:15:03.100
to have to find a way to do in canada what i think every conservative has to do around the world and that is
00:15:08.860
re-win the battle that we've won in the past uh we won the argument in the 80s for small government
00:15:15.020
for free markets for uh you know lower taxes free trade free trade yes yes yes free trade we we won
00:15:23.020
the argument i believe we won the argument in large part we had great ambassadors like reagan and thatcher
00:15:29.420
great ambassadors for the cause but we also had the world's biggest living laboratory experiment
00:15:36.460
we had eastern europe and the soviet bloc countries where we could point to and say do you want to see
00:15:41.660
where government intervention the economy leads you you know where are their bread lines are their bread
00:15:45.500
lines in moscow or paris you know their bread lines in london or in krakow and how many people got shot
00:15:52.940
trying to get over the wall into east berlin nobody uh so we were able to you know we were able to convince
00:15:59.660
people here that free trade free markets uh limited government low taxes that is the recipe for
00:16:05.180
prosperity that's what lifts people out of poverty that's what increases the quality of life in a
00:16:10.140
country the problem was when we won we went home and the left didn't you know they they they changed
00:16:17.500
the names of their policies they they found different leaders to advocate for them and now we see the
00:16:23.420
same arguments creeping back in that government knows best that the only way to come out of this
00:16:27.740
recovery is for more government intervention and more government programs and government control
00:16:32.860
so we need to we need to kind of go back to basics i know that there are young canadians who have
00:16:37.580
never heard the free market arguments that won the day a generation ago so we have to
00:16:43.740
we have to recommit ourselves and and win that argument again otherwise we're going to see
00:16:47.660
a sharp turn to the left in a lot of areas one of the narratives that has emerged through the
00:16:53.020
leadership race now is that your personal social conservatism cost the conservatives the election
00:16:59.500
in 2019 and i'm almost hesitant to ask about it because this was the only thing that the media has
00:17:04.540
wanted to ask you about at certain points but i hope you'll indulge me if i i frame it in a different
00:17:08.940
way because what happened to you through the election i i think would be to most people fairly chilling
00:17:15.180
for anyone of any faith whoever wants to seek political office that all of a sudden personal
00:17:20.380
religious beliefs that are shared by millions of canadians across different religions would be
00:17:25.340
really deemed something that is inherently disqualifying and we even heard this from some
00:17:29.900
people in the conservatives that's you know the famous quote that social conservative was an albatross
00:17:34.540
or a stinking albatross so how do you reconcile that now well i i firmly believe that uh as you point
00:17:42.060
out this was a media obsession uh i've always been very clear when i ran for parliament 2004 throughout my
00:17:48.780
career when i started running for leadership of the party to the my final day as leader i said i have
00:17:55.340
personal views on a variety of of social issues as do millions of canadians it's very normal in
00:18:00.620
in canadian life to know people who have a difference of opinion on any number of social
00:18:04.220
issues uh and that's part of what makes this country great is that we can hold those views and
00:18:08.940
we can believe what we choose to believe uh and uh but my commitment was i wasn't going to reopen
00:18:14.540
those divisive uh issues that have divided our party in the past and there was clearly no consensus
00:18:19.820
in canadian in the canadian public for us i made that commitment that as prime minister
00:18:24.540
we would not reopen these issues and and and and the status quo would not change uh for for those
00:18:29.500
things clear concise easy to understand message throughout the campaign of course the many members
00:18:36.220
of the media tried to uh make it an issue and it was always frustrating uh you know to see i would
00:18:42.380
the only people that were asking it were were members of the media and then they would write
00:18:46.860
the articles like sheer was questioned again today i said well yeah because you did you know it's not
00:18:51.660
that not that people were bringing up at the doors or my candidates weren't telling me that it was it was
00:18:56.220
literally just a thousand different ways to to ask the question and um but i do but but i do believe
00:19:02.780
if you go back and look uh look at the look at the message that liberals were putting forward in the last
00:19:07.900
couple weeks of the campaign that that i think canadians were were okay that that that a leader
00:19:13.740
might have a different view on something i think they wanted to hear that commitment that some of
00:19:17.020
these issues wouldn't be reopened and i believe i did so it's important the next leader recognizes that
00:19:22.620
social conservatives not only have a place in our party but uh you know that they're a valuable part
00:19:28.380
of it and i think back to some of the work we did in the previous concerto government
00:19:31.660
um for example uh when we raised the age of consent from 14 to 16 that that came primarily
00:19:38.540
from the social conservative part of our caucus but it was quickly embraced by everybody because
00:19:43.980
you know of course of course we need to protect young children and it became an issue that that
00:19:49.180
everybody could agree on and it was a it was one of those issues that that everybody in the party
00:19:54.540
could rally around so that's my message to the next leaders find those opportunities to to to make
00:19:59.420
sure that every part of our member is is part of the conversation and feels valued and it is
00:20:03.980
interesting when you talk about the media's role in that that the people who claim that conservatives
00:20:09.260
won't get off of those issues are often the ones that bring it up the most and even in the last
00:20:13.260
few months we have a bill before parliament bill c8 from the liberals seeking to ban conversion
00:20:18.940
therapy which if you accept that terminology people will conjure an image in their mind of what that
00:20:23.660
is and the interesting thing is that the letter of the law that they're proposing has nothing to
00:20:28.540
do with really the stated purpose of it and i know that some of the socially conservative members of
00:20:33.500
the conservative caucus have done a lot of work on trying to push back against this and shine a light
00:20:38.380
on on why they're really going after in many cases just private faith-based counseling or even family
00:20:45.900
conversations what's your response to that as a conservative leader who has socially conservative views when
00:20:52.300
the liberals are putting what seems like a wedge bill forward mm-hmm well uh you know i will agree
00:20:58.860
with the the point you made that often it's the conservatives have a clear position on something and
00:21:03.660
it's the media that that uh that that tries to you know re-litigate it or analyze it from a thousand
00:21:09.820
different ways on this particular issue let me first and foremost say that uh the conservatives are opposed
00:21:15.500
to any so-called practice that would uh belittle dehumanize bully uh someone in to coerce someone
00:21:23.100
in to try to change their their sexual orientation we've been very clear about that many members of our
00:21:29.100
of our of our caucus i've heard a lot of feedback uh from many canadians about this are concerned with
00:21:34.140
the way the liberals drafted the legislation so we can agree with the goal you know we we know but
00:21:39.180
we we're all opposed to uh scenarios of young people being subjected to belittling bullying type
00:21:47.260
of uh treatment but the way the liberals have have drafted the legislation is the definition of that
00:21:52.540
is very vague and so what i don't want to see is you know conversations being criminalized or legitimate
00:21:58.620
conversations that parents might have with uh with children that people might want to have with their
00:22:02.220
friends you know or seek any kind of guidance or counseling for any reason we don't want to see
00:22:07.500
those types of legitimate conversations being criminalized the way the liberals have drafted
00:22:13.180
the bill so there's an effort underway uh to fix the definition of that legislation so that we make
00:22:18.460
a clear distinction between dehumanizing unacceptable behavior and legitimate conversations that people
00:22:23.900
may want to have in a free society and i know that it'll be a free vote it's very important for our
00:22:29.180
part our party we have free votes on these types of matters it's something our members guard very
00:22:34.380
jealous jealously so i i will be supporting efforts to to fix that definition have the liberals been
00:22:39.500
receptive to that no and you know it's it's this frustrating thing that they you know they explain
00:22:46.460
on the justice department website what they mean to do with the bill and so we said great put that in
00:22:52.140
the bill you know why put that up on a website why not have that incorporated into the language it's a
00:22:57.740
little bit like what they do with the firearms yeah regulations you know the letter of the regulations
00:23:02.620
have made a whole bunch of types of uh hunting shotguns illegal well the minister says no no that's
00:23:08.300
not what we mean what we mean by that so we say well great put that in the regulations and and we see
00:23:14.220
this before we've seen this time and time again with the liberals where they they word things either
00:23:19.340
clumsily or purposefully to be vague and ambiguous and there is a lack of clarity and then people do find
00:23:26.300
themselves running afoul of the law with with with no intention of doing so uh so uh that's why we're
00:23:35.580
there are many of us that are focused on trying to clarify that definition so that we're we're not
00:23:41.100
criminalizing types of things that nobody ever conceived of or or meant to criminalize you mentioned
00:23:46.140
earlier the importance of winning the argument and and this is something that for me as a conservative
00:23:50.780
that's working in a media environment is an important thing what do you think you've done
00:23:55.900
throughout your tenure as leader to advance small c conservatism well uh i think back to the first issue
00:24:02.380
that i really had to deal with as leader was when the liberals were raising taxes on small businesses
00:24:07.260
and you go back and look at the language they were using it was pure envy politics you know it was
00:24:13.100
tearing people down it was uh you know anybody was this the famous tax yeah yeah exactly yeah you know
00:24:19.980
calling small business owners tax you not paying their fair share yes and we were able to show
00:24:25.340
canadians during that time it said like one of the most positive messages about the concert of free
00:24:30.700
market economics is that prosperity spreads it's contagious we all do well it's it's it's rising tide
00:24:38.620
economics you know and it's it's when when i worked for a small business the small business owner
00:24:45.420
made money but i had a job thanks to their hard work investment and taking a risk and
00:24:49.900
and all of that so we need to cultivate a society that that wants to replicate that we don't want to
00:24:55.740
punish that and make people feel like their tax sheet so we were able at the time the liberals were
00:24:59.820
using very divisive language really trying to pit one canadian against another and a different class
00:25:05.340
of canadians and we were able to say like yes everybody should pay their fair share absolutely but
00:25:10.700
let's not take away legitimate tools that small businesses have used to grow and expand and create
00:25:16.540
more opportunities not not because not not because we were only worried about the business owner but
00:25:21.660
because the workers will suffer and we were able to make that link that i had a job as a waiter because
00:25:27.020
somebody else owned a restaurant i had a job in an insurance office because somebody else owned that
00:25:31.020
that that that office and we were able to to make that connection that more low-income canadians would be
00:25:38.140
harmed by these policies than there would be help so i think back to that that was a you know we're very
00:25:44.460
successful there i think i believe the the markers that we put down as a party on foreign policy
00:25:50.460
when we talk about the conservative party's position on china we're the only voice standing
00:25:55.100
calling for canada stand up for itself and recognize the threat that this current communist
00:26:00.140
regime poses a very principled foreign policy and our platform was uh was full of
00:26:07.740
free market ideas and ways to encourage uh private sector growth so i believe we we accomplished a
00:26:13.260
lot we certainly uh have more work to do to form government but i'm going to do whatever i can to
00:26:18.620
help the next leader accomplish that so you've served as a member of parliament as speaker of the
00:26:23.420
house as leader of the official opposition how do you see your role in public service if there is a
00:26:29.500
role in public service moving forward i know you've talked about supporting the next conservative
00:26:33.900
leader but what does that look like well honestly that's up to the next leader fair enough
00:26:38.140
yeah uh i i want to do whatever i can to help um i love my riding in saskatchewan regina capella is
00:26:45.020
a mixed urban rural riding i've got the northeast corner of regina and then a lot of
00:26:51.500
rural communities around it lots of issues that i'm very passionate about we've seen our energy sector
00:26:56.380
devastated by this liberal government our agriculture sector we had a harvest from hell
00:27:00.700
in the fall it was a wet harvest and many farmers didn't get their crop off to the spring that's caused a
00:27:05.500
cash flow crunch that this government's not paying any attention to so being a loud voice and a strong
00:27:11.340
advocate for my own constituents is is my primary goal apart from that i've got a lot of interest
00:27:17.100
in policy i i think that a lot more attention needs to be paid to things like our monetary policy in
00:27:24.540
this country the bank of canada is printing five billion dollars a week of new money out of thin air
00:27:30.620
well they're not even printing it because they're creating it digitally well that's going to have
00:27:34.620
consequences over time and that's not getting a lot of attention so you know finding some policy
00:27:39.100
issues i can sink my teeth into uh would be very rewarding but honestly whatever the next leader
00:27:44.380
would like me to do i'm happy to play any part i can so is your goal to stay on as member of parliament
00:27:49.820
and run again in the next election absolutely i i as i said i love my riding i'm honored to have
00:27:56.220
received their trust in the last few elections and uh hopefully i can uh regain that trust in the next
00:28:01.660
election you'll re-earn that trust uh in the next election and i i will absolutely run in the next
00:28:06.060
election what would you like your legacy to be as party leader because i mean this has been three
00:28:11.260
years of your life it's been a very pivotal three years in the the landscape of canadian politics and
00:28:16.700
also people forget that the conservative party of canada in its current iteration is a young party
00:28:21.100
you're the the second elected leader the third overall if we include your former colleague rana
00:28:26.060
ambrose what would you like to see your contribution to that story as being honestly the the the biggest
00:28:32.060
validation for my time as leader of the party will be if we're successful in the next election
00:28:37.100
uh because then i can i can look and say you know i got us inside the 20 and uh somebody else
00:28:43.020
carried the ball over the goal line that's fine in a team sport it doesn't matter who who crosses
00:28:47.900
the line it's it's about the w at the end of the game and if uh if we win the next election that
00:28:52.060
i believe will be a uh strong reflection on the my time as you say you know it's i'm only the
00:28:57.820
third leader of the party it's not a guaranteed for the conservative party of canada to a stay united
00:29:02.300
it's not a guarantee for the conservative party of canada to win 10 seats in quebec it's not a
00:29:05.980
guarantee for us to to do as well as we did in brisk only even in western canada when justin
00:29:10.780
trudeau won seats in calgary and edmonton that that conservatives have never had rarely lost before
00:29:15.420
so regaining those back are are never something that we can take for granted so there's a very strong
00:29:20.380
foundation there for the next leader to build on and you'd be comfortable serving under any of the
00:29:25.340
four candidates leadership i i i'm going to run the next election i will support the next leader
00:29:30.060
whoever he or she may be this is a party that belongs to our members it's not we are not a
00:29:35.100
party run by the laurentian elite we don't have a small group of people who decide who should or
00:29:39.980
shouldn't be leader that's the job of our members that's their right as members and i respect that so
00:29:45.980
i will respect their choice thank you for your time and thank you for your service thank you very
00:29:50.460
much andrew thanks for listening to the andrew lawton show support the program by donating to true