ManoWhisper
Home
Shows
About
Search
Juno News
- March 17, 2021
Are all lockdown restrictions "science-based?"
Episode Stats
Length
3 minutes
Words per Minute
189.07172
Word Count
609
Sentence Count
37
Summary
Summaries are generated with
gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ
.
Transcript
Transcript is generated with
Whisper
(
turbo
).
00:00:00.000
All of these restrictions on our daily lives, they're based on the science, right? That's what
00:00:10.640
they keep telling us. All of these very particular rules about how many people can be in which
00:00:15.940
location at a particular time and which activities can be allowed and which ones can't. I mean,
00:00:20.420
there's a very granular science behind this. I don't know what it is. I think it's like
00:00:24.320
calculations, intense math or something like that. Or maybe they put on the white lab coats
00:00:29.000
because, you know, when you're wearing that, it gives greater authenticity. You put on the white
00:00:32.120
lab coats and you bring out those Bunsen burners and you're sort of putting chemicals together,
00:00:36.180
something like that. Something totally above my pay grade is what determines all of this. That is
00:00:40.040
what I've been led to assume. Am I correct? Well, I don't know because there's an interesting little
00:00:45.120
situation that unfolded in Ontario that's leading me to actually doubt that all of this is 100%
00:00:51.200
science-based. Cardinal Collins, he is the Archbishop for the Diocese of Toronto, and he started this
00:00:58.080
petition calling on the Ford government in Ontario to change the rules around religious service
00:01:04.440
attendance, how many people can go into places of worship. It was set at 10. He said, this makes no
00:01:10.740
sense. It's an arbitrary number. And he recommended it be placed at a percentage of allowable capacity.
00:01:17.280
And I guess he referenced one place of worship that he had that had 1,500 seating capacity. So he said
00:01:23.700
only 10 people in a place of 1,500, but then there's another place that can only fit 100 people,
00:01:28.760
but they can still have 10 people. He said, it makes no sense. And he got this petition going and
00:01:33.820
he sent it out to his own religious community, but also encouraged other faiths, synagogues,
00:01:38.780
mosques, and so forth to get involved. And this is a person who's really well respected in his community.
00:01:43.640
He has a voice. And guess what? The rules changed. And they moved to exactly what Cardinal Collins
00:01:50.700
was calling for away from that arbitrary, that was his word, arbitrary rules about 10 persons only to
00:01:57.340
a percentage of capacity, 15%. So he got a victory there. He accomplished something. Is Cardinal Collins
00:02:03.940
on the side? Is he also an epidemiologist? Is he like a part-time public health official? Did he put
00:02:10.080
on the lab coat and did he, you know, do all the fancy science experiments? No, he's a man who has been
00:02:15.660
thinking logically about all of this and he cares passionately about his community and what he does.
00:02:19.740
And he made his voice heard and he rallied other voices. And guess what? I assume that there was
00:02:26.700
quite a lot of people who took him up on that petition offer and the government felt the pressure
00:02:31.200
and then they changed this policy that Cardinal Collins was correct, made no sense. A bit of a teachable
00:02:38.040
moment there for everyone in Ontario who's frustrated this restriction or that restriction. And they do go,
00:02:43.640
what's ever going to make these people change their minds? Maybe they just need a different Bunsen burner.
00:02:48.420
Maybe something is off with the science calculations and so forth. Or maybe, just maybe, it is a lesson
00:02:55.000
that make your voice heard, get like-minded people to join you, get those petitions going, whatever it
00:03:00.920
is, lobby the government. I know it can seem futile, but this is an example. Cardinal Collins did it.
00:03:06.380
It works. Some of these decisions? Arbitrary? I think so. And in this case, there was a victory
00:03:12.180
for common sense.
Link copied!