Britain versus Tommy Robinson： Day 1
Episode Stats
Words per minute
167.35762
Summary
In the first day of Tommy Robinson's new trial, the defense and prosecution argue that he was doing what any concerned citizen journalist would do: reporting on a critical issue facing the community of Huddersfield, England. And in reporting on that issue, he was subject to a reporting restriction.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
I'm outside the Old Bailey in downtown London, England, my third time coming to
00:00:12.900
this country for the very same reason to cover the ordeal that the legal system
00:00:16.980
in Britain is putting Tommy Robinson through. It stems back to a contempt of
00:00:22.440
court allegation against him for which he was convicted, jailed, then that was
00:00:27.600
overturned on appeal but then the Attorney General ordered a new trial on
00:00:31.920
it which brings us to what's happening this week. A two-day trial prosecuted by
00:00:36.240
a lawyer for the Attorney General basically that could put Tommy Robinson
00:00:41.040
back to jail again. What we saw emerge today in the first day of the trial was
00:00:45.780
the theme unfolding about the defense strategy and also the crown strategy in
00:00:50.700
prosecution. Tommy Robinson is saying two main things chief among them that he was
00:00:56.460
reporting. He was doing what any concerned citizen journalist would do,
00:01:00.000
bringing attention to a critical issue facing the community of Huddersfield and
00:01:04.380
that was the gang rape, the sex grooming gangs that existed in there that were
00:01:09.000
targeting young girls. And in reporting on this he was outside the courtroom hosting
00:01:13.860
that infamous live stream in which he filmed defendants who are now convicts
00:01:19.320
heading into the court. He said look I'm reporting but more importantly I wasn't
00:01:23.400
reporting on anything that wasn't in the public interest. His argument,
00:01:26.940
his lawyer's argument is that the public interest, the public domain, these things
00:01:32.280
are exempt from the contempt of court and the reporting restrictions that the
00:01:36.840
government is trying to claim here. So he was reporting on something in the
00:01:39.840
public domain, reporting in the public interest, but moreover Tommy said that he
00:01:43.940
has out of an abundance of caution gone through a number of what were called
00:01:47.900
checks, verifications to ensure that there wasn't a reporting restriction that
00:01:53.000
would impact him. And we heard a few key ways where he said he did this. Number one,
00:01:57.920
he went in and asked a security guard, this is not in dispute. Number two, he looked at
00:02:02.900
the court website, it did not say there was a reporting restriction. And number three,
00:02:07.340
he had a colleague of his go in and actually look at the courtroom door and
00:02:11.360
the monitors in the courtroom and those did not have the indication of a
00:02:15.500
reporting restriction. Now the British judicial policy is that a reporting
00:02:19.740
restriction is published in all of those places. And what happened? The Crown's
00:02:25.100
star witness, a woman by the name of Michelle Dunderdale, testified and her
00:02:29.360
word is that the court failed. That's what she said, the court failed at doing this.
00:02:34.260
The process has failed, the internal process has failed, and she says that this is
00:02:39.020
something they've had to come up with another way around, a new process, they've
00:02:42.720
needed to change it up. But there's an admission from the government that this
00:02:46.800
reporting restriction was not notified. Now a couple of things happened to
00:02:51.220
combat this. The Attorney General's lawyer said, number one, that it doesn't matter
00:02:56.280
anyway because, you know, the reporting restriction exists whether you are
00:02:59.960
negligent or not, whether you're ignorant or not. But also, and this is the most
00:03:04.100
important thing, he accused Tommy Robinson of making it up. He said to Tommy, I
00:03:08.580
believe you've created these stories about going through these checks after the
00:03:12.660
fact. Tommy said that's incorrect. And what did the lawyer for the Attorney
00:03:15.940
General say? I will quote exactly, oh well. So this is what's happening here. You have
00:03:21.000
the government of the United Kingdom, the Attorney General of this country, of
00:03:24.980
England and Wales, saying to Tommy Robinson, we believe you've made it up, you
00:03:29.000
didn't go through these checks, even though the government admits, the
00:03:32.820
government's witness admits that these things did not happen, these things that
00:03:37.580
were supposed to happen. Now there are obviously going to be a lot of
00:03:40.320
arguments about the law itself, not the facts of the case, but the law. And we're
00:03:44.540
expected to hear more of those when day two of the trial kicks off. I'll be in
00:03:48.520
the courtroom again if you want to follow my tweets starting from about 4.30 a.m.
00:03:52.700
Eastern Time. If you're an early riser, you can do so. My Twitter name is
00:03:56.200
across the bottom there, at Andrew Lawton. Back in court tomorrow for day two of the
00:04:01.340
trial of Tommy Robinson. For True North, I'm Andrew Lawton.