Juno News - November 17, 2022


Canada's new assisted death rules are giving up on the vulnerable


Episode Stats


Length

36 minutes

Words per minute

176.58421

Word count

6,399

Sentence count

4

Harmful content

Misogyny

1

sentences flagged

Toxicity

1

sentences flagged

Hate speech

1

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

In this episode of The Andrew Lawton Show, host Andrew Lawton talks about the latest in the CPSOM hearings on the Public Order Emergency Commission hearings, and the proposed changes to Canada's assisted dying laws, including expanded eligibility for assisted suicide for people with mental illnesses.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 welcome to canada's most irreverent talk show this is the andrew lawton show brought to you by true north
00:00:08.680 hello everyone and welcome to you all this is canada's most irreverent talk show here on
00:00:19.500 true north tuesday november 15th just after 4 0 4 p.m eastern time if you are keeping track
00:00:26.840 i thank you very much for tuning in today i'm going to be talking a little bit later on about
00:00:32.400 the latest in the public order emergency commission hearings some pretty big evidence coming out this
00:00:38.240 week notably the confirmation that the rcmp commissioner brenda lucky did not in fact ask
00:00:44.720 for the emergencies act and even a day before the federal government invoked it advised the federal
00:00:50.640 government she didn't need it and the big one is the declaration by the cesus director david vigneault
00:00:58.500 that cesus did not see a threat to the security of canada and you may say well what's the big deal
00:01:04.520 it's cesus you know why what do they have to do with it well the cesus act is what defines the
00:01:10.400 emergencies act when it comes to setting out what a threat to the security of canada is so if the
00:01:16.260 cesus folks are saying there's no threat that seems like a pretty big issue we'll talk about
00:01:21.600 that a little bit later on with mark joseph who was supposed to be on the show last week and we had
00:01:27.400 some technical difficulties but we'll be sure to get john mark on this time we have like double triple
00:01:32.760 quadruple checked it so that'll be coming up very shortly i want to start though on a topic that is
00:01:39.620 a fair bit more personal to me but at the same time still a significant topic and one that i hope
00:01:46.240 you'll indulge in because this is a
00:01:49.020 this is bigger than partisanship and it's one of these things that i hope people on the left
00:02:00.100 on the right people that don't even care about politics will pay attention to back in march of
00:02:07.120 2021 the liberal government passed bill c7 now c7 contained a very radical set of reforms
00:02:15.260 to canada's assisted dying laws now assisted suicide has been legal in canada since 2016
00:02:21.540 it was legalized after a supreme court of canada ruling and the threshold set out in those initial
00:02:28.220 laws involved that someone had to have a grievous and irremediable medical condition they had to be
00:02:35.060 in profound suffering and they had to be facing a natural death that was reasonably foreseeable
00:02:41.640 which is to say the assisted suicide regime in canada was meant to be for people that
00:02:47.060 had a terminal condition that was killing them they knew the direction it was going to go and the
00:02:52.420 person was suffering you fast forward to 2021 bill c7 expands it dramatically by taking out that section
00:03:03.160 that says a death must be reasonably foreseeable in other words someone who is facing a condition that is
00:03:10.520 causing suffering but is not killing them will now be eligible for an assisted suicide and you may think
00:03:18.400 that is an insignificant change until you consider that it also involves expanding eligibility to include
00:03:24.080 people with mental illnesses this is for me incredibly personal some of you may know this some of you may
00:03:32.940 not i've written about it in the past but it doesn't come up every day in 2010 i nearly succeeded
00:03:38.300 at killing myself i had been battling depression for years very serious i had been in the system so to
00:03:45.460 speak i had been trying to get better i had been seeing a psychiatrist until not long before the
00:03:51.180 suicide attempt which as i said in a column i wrote yesterday was hardly a ringing endorsement of him
00:03:56.140 i had been on antidepressants i had seen therapists i was convinced that there was no hope i was convinced
00:04:04.020 that life could not get better and i was convinced that i'd be better off dead i was suffering to use
00:04:10.660 the language of bill c7 or canada's assisted suicide laws i felt what i was going through was grievous and
00:04:17.420 irremediable i didn't have a reasonably foreseeable natural death but that part doesn't matter thanks
00:04:23.180 to bill c7 now i sounded the alarm about this as did other mental health advocates and organizations
00:04:29.320 in 2021 and the government said just trust us they put in a little two-year sunset clause where
00:04:35.900 they determined that well we'll just pass the bill as it is and we'll give it two years for people to
00:04:42.300 come up with regulations alternatives we'll do a review and of course there's been a little bit of a
00:04:47.040 report on it some parliamentarians have gotten together but so far nothing has changed and as of march
00:04:53.640 2023 someone with severe depression someone with schizophrenia someone with some other mental
00:05:01.380 illness will be able to for reasons of their mental suffering alone get an assisted suicide
00:05:08.960 whereas it used to be the government devoted its resources and the health care system devoted its
00:05:14.000 resources to stopping suicide now they will sanction it and i did write about this yesterday
00:05:21.200 and i've been wanting to say it for a while and i was trying to find the right time i was trying to
00:05:26.580 find the right words because it is difficult it's difficult to dig back into a time of my life that
00:05:31.600 was so unrecognizable to the life i live now and i think that is part and parcel of why this is such a
00:05:38.200 problem because i got better and the life i'm living is proof that it's possible to get better
00:05:46.660 but instead the government is willing to give up on the vulnerable and willing to capitulate to a
00:05:55.080 feeling that is very much coming from a disordered place that suicide is an answer it's not it never
00:06:01.380 is not when you're talking about mental health and mental illness be it depression as it was in my
00:06:07.920 experience or something else and there's i get angry about this at just the ghoulishness of people that say
00:06:19.040 this is okay and you know me i am about as libertarian as it comes i believe people should have the right
00:06:24.720 to do what they want up until the point it infringes on the rights of others i don't support the criminalization of
00:06:30.020 suicide but there are caveats in that even the most ironclad libertarians will say that the government
00:06:37.920 has a role in protecting the vulnerable and when you're talking about people with mental illness
00:06:43.080 you're not talking people that have decided based on a complete assessment of all the options available
00:06:49.020 to them that this is what they want to do you're talking about people for whom the desire to die
00:06:54.000 is a symptom of what it is that's wrong with them and it's sickening to me when i think of the
00:07:01.920 health care workers the health care workers who slaved tirelessly who were dedicated to saving my
00:07:10.400 life in 2010 because it i very nearly was not here today i very nearly didn't make it my family was by
00:07:20.300 my side at the hospital they were praying people around the country that knew me were praying
00:07:24.720 and it was through those prayers that i was saved and i think god works through health care
00:07:32.900 practitioners so it was through the health care practitioners as well that i was saved but the
00:07:37.620 reason i tell this story is because i want you to understand the juxtaposition of those same health
00:07:43.480 care practitioners the same health care system in 2010 working to save my life
00:07:48.420 in contrast with 2023 when the health care system is facilitating people who want to end their lives
00:07:57.360 when the same health care system is there to help people so under the current rules if someone goes
00:08:05.300 to a doctor and says i'm thinking of ending my life the doctor actually has a duty to protect them
00:08:09.440 and there's a reason for that because we understand this is not a normal thing to want this is not a
00:08:16.580 rational thing to want so the government is able to intervene the government is able to keep people
00:08:23.280 in a hospital against their will again i don't support imprisoning people who have done nothing wrong
00:08:29.560 but we're talking about measures that are there to protect people who are about to commit harm to
00:08:34.620 themselves or to others in 2023 if someone in the situation i was in in 2020 2010 were to go to their
00:08:43.760 doctor and say i'm thinking of ending my life the doctor could say well let me give you a referral
00:08:48.060 dr smith does that here you go that is not health care and that is a complete rejection
00:08:56.580 of the line that was given to people when assisted suicide was first coming into canada that this was
00:09:02.200 something that was intended to provide death with dignity that was the line death with dignity
00:09:08.380 it was so that people dealing with degenerative conditions like multiple sclerosis and als who
00:09:14.960 are in excruciating pain who are declining in their capacity in their physical and mental capacity so
00:09:20.540 that these people could have death when they were still a recognizable forms of themselves we can
00:09:25.860 debate that and we can discuss that but that is very different from what c7 has brought into place
00:09:32.040 that is very different from the situation that the canadian public is now finding itself in now
00:09:37.980 where someone who's suffering is purely mental very real but not physical someone dealing with an
00:09:47.520 affliction that is not going to end their life that is not degenerative and that in many cases there
00:09:54.320 could be hope on the horizon for even if in the moment it doesn't feel like it
00:10:00.100 this troubles me greatly and it should trouble all of you and this isn't a left-right issue as i said
00:10:07.360 this isn't about liberal versus conservative it was quite shameful when the liberal government
00:10:11.860 didn't listen to a growing chorus of people from all aspects of civil society and the opposition
00:10:17.320 parties and remember if you go back to 2021 the senate of canada tried to put a bunch of reforms in
00:10:25.100 that would deal with this they tried to do a specific carve out for people with mental illness now
00:10:29.760 in my view that wouldn't have saved all the problems with the bill but it would have at least
00:10:34.060 saved the big glaring one that trips my radar and the federal government said no the federal government
00:10:41.580 wouldn't do it and the senate eventually caved the predominantly liberal senators or liberal appointed
00:10:46.840 senators eventually gave in and just said okay we'll pass the bill the way the liberal government
00:10:52.560 wants it the way justin trudeau wants it i don't often put out calls to action like the one that i'm
00:11:00.140 about to do but you need to call your members of parliament about this one if you believe in life
00:11:07.000 if you believe in human dignity if you believe that there is hope for people struggling with mental
00:11:12.500 illness you need to call your liberal members of parliament this is going to kick in in march of
00:11:18.900 2023 that gives four months until people in my situation in 2010 could just walk up to a doctor's
00:11:26.900 office and say i would like you to sign off on my assisted death there's a review period you need
00:11:31.940 multiple visits you need another doctor to sign off as well it's not like suicide is just dispensed
00:11:36.920 with no notice in the storefront like a tim hortons coffee but there are people that will do it
00:11:42.900 and one example of this a quite shameful example uh just a couple of months ago there was a man who
00:11:49.460 applied for assisted suicide because he was unable to get access to affordable housing
00:11:55.000 and he didn't want to die he didn't want an assisted death but he said well you know what it's
00:11:59.540 better than the life i'm living now there was a woman in april or may earlier this year i can't remember
00:12:06.040 the exact month but she was dealing with chemical sensitivity she was in affordable housing she wanted
00:12:12.780 to find alternative housing and she couldn't and she succeeded at getting an assisted death now her issue
00:12:20.120 was not that she wanted to die she preferred alternatives which were not available to her
00:12:26.580 so assisted suicide was treated as an expedient option not as a last resort
00:12:33.520 and that's what i fear will happen with struggling with mental illnesses to put a fine point on this
00:12:40.520 i am convinced that if the laws that will be around starting in march were there in 2010
00:12:47.380 i would be dead right now and again twitter discourse being what it is i'm i'm ready i'm
00:12:55.000 hesitant to ask the question would would the world be better off if that were the case but i i hope most
00:12:59.580 people could have the humanity to say no it wouldn't regardless of whatever things we may agree or disagree
00:13:04.160 on but that's the exact type of thing that someone in my situation would have pursued
00:13:09.140 because the message the government is sending with this the message the state is sending
00:13:14.400 is that life is not always worth living
00:13:17.340 the message they're sending is that suicide is not something should be that should be stopped
00:13:22.820 but something that should be perhaps even celebrated it's just a choice
00:13:27.920 and i know there are people out there that have struggled or are struggling with mental illness
00:13:32.740 and i know it's difficult and i know you don't always want the message of hope
00:13:36.080 i know i didn't i i sure as heck didn't if someone were to say oh it's going to get better
00:13:40.080 i would have been like oh come on screw you i've been down this road before but you know what 0.93
00:13:43.500 eventually it did you have to learn for yourself but it did for me 0.98
00:13:46.960 and i know there are people whose family members are struggling and suffering
00:13:51.880 and for those people one thing you should know about this is that if someone goes through the
00:13:58.460 process of medical assistance and dying there is no consultation with family family doesn't even
00:14:04.400 have a right to know about it let alone to intervene so someone could quietly and secretly
00:14:11.340 go through this process and you don't know about it until they're dead
00:14:16.760 so absolutely i'm mad about this and absolutely i think this is a shameful rejection of what health
00:14:25.080 care is supposed to be of what compassion is supposed to be and just take the politics out of it
00:14:29.360 of what human dignity is supposed to be and i don't want anyone to think this is about me trying
00:14:37.140 to impose my values or views on others it's not about that i'm not even arguing that we roll back
00:14:44.160 the protections that exist for medical assistance and dying from 2016 i'm talking about people who do
00:14:51.740 not have the capacity to consent to their own death if anyone does people with serious mental illnesses
00:14:58.700 because their desire to end their life is a symptom so since when do you appease that symptom by giving
00:15:06.840 them what they want and ending their life call your members of parliament that's all i can tell you to
00:15:16.640 do right now they're the ones that made this mess they are the ones who have to fix it i promise i i
00:15:22.080 always this is the problem i normally i have such a cheery disposition and i could have just done i
00:15:27.060 guess like five minutes of suicide jokes knowing that i have lived experience so i'm allowed to but
00:15:31.480 i didn't come up with any good ones so uh we're uh we're gonna just to get all the lighter stuff into
00:15:35.980 the second end of the show here because i do want to talk about what's been happening in the public
00:15:40.840 order emergency commission it's been a bit of a bigger week this week and i want to talk about this
00:15:46.260 in two particular contexts here because there was the cesus memo that came about yesterday and there
00:15:52.700 was also rcmp commissioner brenda lucky's testimony today but before we get into it i want to play a
00:15:58.440 clip for you here in which rob stewart who is formerly the deputy public safety minister
00:16:05.000 acknowledged that cesus found there was no threat to the security of canada in law take a look
00:16:11.280 well david vigno he stated that at no point of the service being cesus assessed the protests in ottawa or
00:16:18.540 elsewhere those referred to as the freedom convoy and related protests and blockades in january and
00:16:23.440 february 2022 constituted a threat to the security of canada as defined in section 2 of the cesus act
00:16:29.280 and that cesus cannot investigate activities constituting lawful protests and i take it uh you were
00:16:36.400 advised of this correct correct all right and can we scroll down then to uh page seven
00:16:43.020 and go to the heading foreign interference
00:16:50.580 so director vigno explained that the use of the term foreign influence under section 2 of the cesus act
00:16:58.980 refers to a foreign state interference as the term is used within the national security community just
00:17:04.080 slow down right uh cesus assessed there was no indication of foreign state interference occurring in
00:17:10.820 the course of the protest cesus did not assess that any foreign state supported the protest through
00:17:17.140 funding that foreign states deployed covert or over disinformation techniques or that any foreign state
00:17:24.100 actors attempted to enter into canada to support the protest and i take it that you were advised of
00:17:29.780 that by cesus and director venue is that correct that is correct all right and if we can go down to page number
00:17:38.020 8 and the heading recommendation to cabinet
00:17:45.380 their director venue states that he learned that the ea referenced the threat definition set out in
00:17:51.860 section 2 of the cc at cesus act once the federal government began to seriously consider invoking the
00:17:57.940 ea between february 10th and 13th he requested that the service prepare a threat assessment on the risks
00:18:04.180 associated with the invocation of the ea he felt an obligation to clearly convey the service's
00:18:09.620 position that there did not exist a threat to the security of canada as defined by the service's legal
00:18:15.860 mandate the threat assessment prepared by the service was that the invocation of the emergencies
00:18:21.620 legislation risked further inflaming imv rhetoric and individuals holding accelerationist or anti-government
00:18:29.220 views you were told that is that correct that is correct all right that was from freedom convoy
00:18:37.620 organizers lawyer brendan miller and his cross-examination of former deputy minister of public
00:18:43.540 safety rob stewart but again i want to just contextualize this the cc act is what defines threats to the
00:18:51.220 security of canada it is that definition that is at the basis of the emergencies act when it comes to
00:18:57.620 public order emergencies so if cesus is advising you know what our intelligence is that this doesn't
00:19:02.820 exist where on earth is the government getting its vastly superior intelligence from joining me now
00:19:09.060 is mark joseph who is a litigator with the democracy fund which has been uh if you've been following the
00:19:15.140 commission hearings closely uh putting a lot of tough questions to the witnesses mark it's good to
00:19:19.860 talk to you thanks for coming on today thanks for having me on andrew now i mean let me just
00:19:25.140 ask a slightly facetious question but i think there's a serious undertone to it why did the
00:19:29.380 commission even reconvene today after that i mean when when the cc intelligence is putting evidence
00:19:34.900 forward the cc director that there was no threat that should just like end the whole thing everyone
00:19:39.620 go home yeah i mean look they got it they got to go through their mandate uh so the commission is
00:19:46.020 going to be here for i think six weeks until november 25th um and they gotta leave no stone unturned but
00:19:52.660 yeah yesterday's uh evidence was fairly damning i think for the reasons you outlined explain to me
00:20:00.020 where things are going from here because obviously we're getting more into the federal story right
00:20:04.740 now we had the federal bureaucrats yesterday today we had brenda lucky with the rcmp eventually we're 1.00
00:20:11.620 going to be hearing from federal cabinet ministers and justin trudeau like what is it that the federal
00:20:17.380 government needs to do to save its case at this point if it even can that's a great question and
00:20:23.460 i'm sure the government lawyers will be asking that uh when they caucus look i'm not i'm not sure i mean
00:20:30.100 we we heard um the national security and intelligence and pfizer uh mentioned and i to be honest i hadn't
00:20:40.580 heard of this department uh before but i assume they're something like the equivalent of the the
00:20:46.660 nsa uh for the united states um and they're going to be uh giving evidence i think in camera so you're
00:20:55.380 right there's a problem for the government because the the evidence for uh violence serious violence as
00:21:01.060 defined under section 2 the csesis act has been thin on the ground um so it's it hasn't come from rcmp
00:21:08.420 it hasn't come from opp ops windsor police um and then we've heard about the the um you know the
00:21:17.060 document that was put to the witnesses with respect to no evidence of uh national security threat so
00:21:24.500 what we have left i guess is the this nsia that may have evidence about serious violence or imves as
00:21:33.620 they're calling it it ideologically motivated violent extremists um but we don't know because
00:21:38.980 we haven't heard any of that yet um and we may not hear it if it's in camera so i just don't know
00:21:44.020 what what's left for the government that i think that's actually an important point because we we know
00:21:49.060 that the cses panel the director and deputy director are going to be testifying in camera as well
00:21:54.580 so there's going to be some evidence that's put before the commission and as i understand it because
00:22:00.500 it's in camera even the other party's lawyers are not there so there's no cross-examination do i
00:22:05.380 understand that correctly that's right we won't know about it um it's just the government of canada
00:22:12.820 the commission lawyers i believe and commissioner rouleau i think so that we're not going to hear
00:22:19.460 about it and we don't have a chance to cross-examine which is uh i i think um professor alford i believe
00:22:25.700 i had an article in the national post uh that suggested it it it will undermine the confidence
00:22:32.900 in the process i believe um if we're not allowed to test the evidence or hear it yeah and and again
00:22:40.820 and i'm not suspect i'm not accusing the commissioner or the commission itself of any wrongdoing here and
00:22:47.140 and i mean even the commissioner as i understand it doesn't know what the evidence is so so he could
00:22:51.860 make a finding after he's heard it that this is something that can be disclosed but it's very
00:22:56.500 difficult for a canadian who's already fairly skeptical of the government's approach here to
00:23:01.940 have faith and confidence because the government has up until this point i'd say not had a very
00:23:07.780 convincing case because all of these agencies from the opp ottawa police windsor police rcmp and cesis are
00:23:14.580 saying the emergencies act wasn't necessary and if the one witness that we don't get to hear from is
00:23:19.780 somehow giving the magic evidence that it is that's going to be a tough pill to swallow for a lot of
00:23:25.460 people yeah i agree and i i think i think most reasonable people can see that i mean justice has
00:23:30.340 to be done it has to be seen to be done uh and the lack of transparency i think will will affect the
00:23:35.300 confidence in the outcome not to say that justice commissioner relo um you know wouldn't wouldn't make a
00:23:41.620 proper finding it's just that you know we don't have a look into uh the basis for his finding with
00:23:48.900 respect to that evidence um so i think it's a bit of a problem but again we don't as you say commissioner
00:23:54.180 relo could um could you know dismiss or consider the evidence um you know as he sees fit so one interesting
00:24:03.300 aspect of this is that you have a lot of groups that have come out that are not supportive of the
00:24:09.860 emergencies act even though they're not supportive of the convoy either i mean one notable example is
00:24:14.740 the coalition of ottawa residents and businesses their their lawyer is paul champ paul champ has uh
00:24:20.580 has been critical publicly of the emergencies act his clients have not taken a position on it even
00:24:26.260 though they're not obviously friends of the convoy plus you've got civil liberties groups that like
00:24:30.580 the canadian civil liberties association not only in group by any stretch that have come forward and
00:24:35.700 their line of questioning has really been focused on i think the money and that the bank account
00:24:40.260 freezes so the democracy fund i know is a big supporter of civil liberties but but what is it
00:24:45.380 that just from your perspective you'd like to get out of this i mean what is what is the tdf's
00:24:50.820 what is a win for you as the democracy funds lawyer well look i mean we want all the evidence to be
00:24:57.780 heard i mean we're i think most of the lawyers want to be fair to the witnesses and give them a chance to give
00:25:04.820 uh to recount their experiences uh as they went through the process um but tdf is concerned that
00:25:14.820 this the emergency act wasn't properly declared and we really want to test that because it's an
00:25:21.300 important uh it's an important situation i mean you can't just arbitrarily or unreasonably declare an
00:25:29.380 emergency to overcome political opposition that's why we got rid of the uh the war measurements act
00:25:35.540 uh that preceded the emergencies act it was just too broad it was too sweeping i believe one of the
00:25:40.340 politicians said you just wanted to move a bicycle and you got a moving van that's what the the powers
00:25:46.660 gave you um and so it was the emergencies act is is not supposed to be invoked except in i would suggest
00:25:54.660 the most existential of crises um and tdf is concerned that that might not have been the case
00:26:01.060 i think the view here is that it probably wasn't um so what do we do from here i mean we're looking to
00:26:08.100 commissioner lodik to provide some policy solutions hopefully um if he agrees that it wasn't uh reasonably
00:26:15.220 invoked but we just don't know so yeah we're going to be holding the government to account that's that's
00:26:19.940 our mandate i i don't want to get too far ahead of things here because i know there is still uh
00:26:24.980 testimony remaining and there could be new witnesses even that that weren't on that initial
00:26:29.380 list that was published but i i've heard very conflicting things about what is going to be in
00:26:35.140 the commissioner's final report and as i understand it and please correct me if i'm wrong there doesn't
00:26:40.180 need to be based on the terms of reference or based on the emergencies act itself a definitive
00:26:46.580 ruling on it was justified or unjustified it could just be a series of observations a statement of
00:26:52.820 facts do am i understanding that properly yeah i believe so i mean he he is uh his mandate is to
00:27:00.020 examine the conditions that led to the declaration of the emergency so uh he doesn't have to make any
00:27:06.180 definitive uh statement either way that it was legitimate or illegitimate but you know i don't think
00:27:11.780 it's going to be a series of desultory statements about you know what happened i think it's going to
00:27:19.140 be uh purposive right it's it's going to be relevant to the mandate he was given so i expect to
00:27:26.740 see some definitive statements about some aspect of the declaration um but you're right i he's not
00:27:33.860 boxed in about you know saying yeah or nay well and to be fair i mean even if he came out with the
00:27:39.540 most scathing indictment of the emergencies act it's you know the justin trudeau could say okay
00:27:44.100 so what you know just like come out and say yeah we're sorry we didn't mean to and carry on like it
00:27:48.820 doesn't take away from i think the need for there to be political accountability in it but i i think
00:27:53.780 it would obviously be a lot more helpful to have this this report in hand if you're an opposition
00:27:58.740 party if you're a canadian voter if you're uh someone in media and and so on so let me just ask it
00:28:05.300 in a similar context here if we're talking about all of the different battles that are underway right
00:28:10.820 now we've got the parliamentary report we've got the public order emergency commission we've got
00:28:16.420 charter challenges that have been filed here like where do you think the most where where do
00:28:21.300 you think kind of the weak the weak link in the chain is for the emergencies act of all of these
00:28:25.460 different challenges that's a good question um i i just i don't know i mean we've been focused
00:28:34.660 obsessively on the emergencies act so our minds are turned to the deficiencies in the evidence but
00:28:43.300 look there's been a lot of uh legal challenges to aspects um problematic aspects of the covet 19
00:28:51.700 pandemic and and the dissolution of charter rights uh that that we're focused on i mean just the
00:28:57.860 quarantine act tickets themselves um we've you know we're challenging those the the mischief charges
00:29:03.940 arising out of the protests we've you know representing 23 or so clients um in that case uh that that we
00:29:12.260 don't think should be convicted of anything um you know there's a whole bunch a bunch of of areas where
00:29:20.180 charter rights are just being tossed out of out of the window and and you know we'd like to fight
00:29:25.460 them all but we got to pick our battles i mean we're we're um you know suing western university for
00:29:30.420 or the imposition of a booster mandate uh you know should should be required to be boosted umpteen
00:29:37.380 times to go to to get an education i mean you know we're picking that battle we're fighting that fight
00:29:42.900 in the court of appeal soon uh so i don't know where to you know where to begin andrew it's just there's
00:29:48.020 so many areas that are problematic with respect to to your charter rights now when it comes to the
00:29:55.540 public order emergency commission sometimes the questions are are more illuminating than the
00:30:00.340 answers specifically who's asking what like like obviously when peter slowly's lawyer is cross
00:30:05.540 examining like you can tell that he's interested in uh basically protecting the interest of his
00:30:09.780 client and so on same as the city of ottawa ottawa police the commissioner's questions have been
00:30:14.580 interesting because he hasn't been asking a lot of them generally but when he has intervened one
00:30:19.860 theme that i've noticed that he asked a few of the protesters and a few of the police
00:30:25.940 was whether there was ever an alternative arrangement offered to them can you go and protest here
00:30:31.620 instead and the sense that i got in the answers was that that was never the case that no one was
00:30:36.500 ever actually given an alternative to have a peaceful lawful protest when the emergencies that came up
00:30:42.740 and i think that was very interesting as well because publicly the line that we got got from
00:30:47.620 justin trudeau was that your civil liberties are intact your charter rights are intact but on the
00:30:51.780 ground that did not strike me as how it came out yeah i look it's hard to read the tea leaves when
00:30:58.500 you're when you're looking at the the questions the commissioner um is asking so you know and i i
00:31:03.620 can't i can't do it um but yeah that might be the case uh he was concerned the commissioner was
00:31:10.260 concerned about alternatives to protest um we heard some interesting evidence i think from one of the
00:31:15.700 windsor uh police um authorities who said no no we gave we gave him a chance to move to the sidewalk
00:31:22.340 and then once they were on the sidewalk we left them alone then he was pressed on and he's he was
00:31:26.340 shown an arrest of a person who was on the sidewalk and he said no no well that they were still in the red
00:31:31.700 zone yeah um so it wasn't clear that they actually people actually had an opportunity to remain on the
00:31:38.740 sidewalk and protest peacefully but yeah i think there's a conflict i mean that the government said well
00:31:42.740 you still have your charter rights to peacefully protest and assemble but then you know clear out
00:31:46.980 sort of thing so that's that's i think obvious to people that they didn't you know they had to leave
00:31:54.180 um and there there wasn't much of an alternative yeah and i mean i also think there's been a lot to
00:32:00.500 a lot of deference by the government to the fact that the emergencies act says it needs to comply with
00:32:06.100 the charter because saying it doesn't mean it actually does and and the government was using that as
00:32:10.660 like a defense of like no we're not trampling on your charter rights it says right there we have
00:32:14.340 to respect them well okay sure but that doesn't mean you're doing that right yeah i i think there's
00:32:21.620 a conflict there um they rounded people up uh i mean we heard some some testimony about snatching grabs
00:32:29.300 um you know you got you got put in a paddy wagon and then driven out um to you know the boonies and
00:32:35.700 then they let you off and then you had to make a phone call to get someone to pick you up so to
00:32:40.260 don't come back into ottawa um no i don't know how much of that happened but we heard we did hear
00:32:45.460 evidence that that happened so you know i don't know like you say i don't know how much uh practically
00:32:51.060 speaking people had their right to freedom uh freely assemble and protest after the declaration was in
00:32:58.660 place probably not um but you know it's hard it's hard to say very well said mark joseph with the
00:33:06.500 democracy fund i know you got a few weeks left to go in the marathon so uh keep up the good work and
00:33:10.500 thanks for taking some time out to join me thanks for having me andrew all right thank you let's uh do
00:33:15.780 another clip that came out today now this was of brendan miller again the lawyer for the freedom
00:33:21.140 convoy organizers in his cross-examination of the rcmp commissioner and commissioner uh confirming once again
00:33:28.420 that the rcmp was also aware that there didn't seem to be a national security threat afoot
00:33:36.180 commissioner lucky you were present for both the february 13th irg as well as the february 14th
00:33:43.060 cabinet meeting yes i think there was the cabinet meeting was on the 13th and well yeah yeah and so the
00:33:55.620 irg meeting they according to the text messages and the messages that uh we've reviewed they never
00:34:01.300 even asked you to speak um not on the definitely not at the cabinet meeting and i don't i what i did
00:34:10.900 do i don't think i spoke at either um i i thought i did because i had speaking notes but i did brief the
00:34:17.300 minister before that meeting right and the minister never asked you what your opinion was with respect to
00:34:22.420 whether or not there was a section two csis act security threat is that correct in respect to
00:34:28.420 whether or not there was a threat under section two as defined in the csis act if there was a threat to
00:34:33.700 the security of canada no he would have to ask csis right and csis you're aware told him that there
00:34:38.980 wasn't that's what i've been told so thank you those are my questions that's what you just like just
00:34:46.980 try to slip them under the wire as you're out of time but uh you know it's like the oscars the music's
00:34:51.300 playing the microphone's lowering and eventually they're about to just pull you off stage and
00:34:55.300 send john wayne in there or something but that was an obscure reference uh john never mind uh thank you
00:35:01.940 thank you to those who got it anyway but the reason i think that's important is because the government
00:35:07.380 to go back to what mark joseph and i were talking about a few moments ago had access to all of this
00:35:12.180 information and they were supposed to be bringing all these stakeholders together and if you look at
00:35:15.940 the cabinet meeting minutes that have been tabled in evidence you see on the list a bunch of non-cabinet
00:35:21.540 ministers you see oh yes csis director oh yes we have uh brenda lucky oh yes we have the deputy public
00:35:28.180 safety all of these people so how is it that all of these people were together they were all putting
00:35:35.460 their evidence forward supposedly in one place yet no one has heard the evidence that justifies
00:35:42.420 the emergencies act who presented that and in what meeting and why is it not in any of the
00:35:47.060 minutes that is the key question and the one we're going to be following in the remaining weeks of
00:35:51.700 testimony and policy analysis that does it for us for today we'll talk to you tomorrow
00:35:56.580 with more of canada's most irreverent talk show here on true north thank you god bless and good day to
00:36:01.540 you all thanks for listening to the andrew lawton show support the program by donating to true north
00:36:06.820 at www.tnc.news