Juno News - February 02, 2020
Canada's soft approach to the coronavirus
Episode Stats
Words per minute
186.52675
Summary
The coronavirus outbreak in China continues to grow, and so does the number of confirmed cases, raising concerns about the politicization of public health officials and their handling of this global health crisis. Why are we so worried about it? And why are we banning flights from China?
Transcript
00:00:00.000
We're at a very interesting time right now when it comes to the coverage and conversation around
00:00:09.120
the coronavirus. As we speak the numbers of infected cases in Wuhan and the Hubei province
00:00:14.920
and all across China are increasing. Tragically so is the death toll. Now the number of cases in
00:00:20.880
other countries in western countries is increasing but ever so slightly and the Canadian increase is
00:00:26.580
very small. The number of suspected cases is actually decreasing. Most of the tested cases
00:00:32.960
roll over and end up being negative that the people they thought may have it actually just
00:00:36.800
end up having the regular flu or or something else. So that's good news I guess from that perspective
00:00:42.300
but there's still a lot of alarm after the World Health Organization called this a global health
00:00:47.740
crisis that Canada is perhaps not doing enough and doing things a little differently than other
00:00:54.680
countries and you got to step back and you've got to wonder why. There are some concerns about the
00:01:00.480
politicization of public health officials. I remember I first thought this back about eight
00:01:05.220
years or so ago when there were public health officials in cities all across Canada and also
00:01:09.740
in the United States who all jumped on this bandwagon advocating for a pop ban, a soda ban or some sort of
00:01:15.480
tax. There are different variations in different cities but you get the idea and I thought hold on a
00:01:20.660
second. Even if you think these bans are a good idea why are top-notch public health officials who
00:01:26.380
we should be trusting to say nothing but advocating to you know keep our water and beaches clean and all
00:01:31.800
that kind of stuff and talking about immunization they're basically advocating for public policy in a
00:01:38.360
way that it can become a partisan battle. This is not good to see them in this political realm.
00:01:42.800
Likewise it was not too comforting to see Toronto's chief medical officer Dr. Eileen Davila
00:01:49.100
attending a press conference alongside Toronto Mayor John Tory where he was not talking about the
00:01:54.440
nuts and bolts and basic facts of the coronavirus but condemning hate and racism and misinformation
00:02:00.540
and discrimination that was all happening. Now when he made that press conference that was
00:02:05.200
back on Wednesday that stuff just wasn't really happening and when one of my colleagues asked him to
00:02:11.180
give an example of these racist incidents and to back up his claim that people were calling for the
00:02:17.140
Chinese Canadian community to be quarantined. I mean that is quite something to say he refused to answer
00:02:23.480
the question. I don't know what was going on at this press conference. It seemed to be some sort of
00:02:27.820
well let's get in front of racism in case it happens or I don't know were they talking about the fact that
00:02:32.680
two or three idiots on Twitter were saying racist things as two or three idiots on Twitter will always
00:02:37.560
do. I just don't know. I think it was some sort of political correctness well just in case there is
00:02:43.280
intolerance let's sort of preemptively denounce it kind of thing. Politicians like to do that sort of
00:02:49.020
stuff. Public health officials though should not be doing that stuff. They should not be doing the
00:02:54.540
sorts of things that politicians like to do. They should be just the facts man keeping it plain
00:03:00.080
straightforward. We didn't see that and I think that troublingly compromised the integrity of Canada's
00:03:05.600
public health officials at the very time when we need to trust them the most. Now there is another
00:03:11.060
politicized angle going on here or it could be a politicized angle. Conversations about bringing
00:03:16.880
Canadians back from Wuhan on different chartered planes because of course flights are restricted
00:03:22.120
but different countries can say we want to get our citizens out. Now there are about 250 or so
00:03:27.860
Canadians in Wuhan and 180, 190 of them or so have said okay we want to come back to Canada. Now there
00:03:34.880
are a number of other countries who are doing this and they are quarantining their people for two weeks.
00:03:40.200
That seems to be the protocol that other sort of developed nations like-minded countries to Canada
00:03:46.300
is undertaking but at the time of me recording this right now and I know this stuff changes pretty
00:03:51.200
much every hour all the facts and figures and so forth. Canada was saying no we are not actually
00:03:57.080
going to be quarantining it and and public health minister Patty Hadji just said if they show symptoms
00:04:02.420
we'll quarantine them. Why are we so out of step with other countries? And then there is the banning of the
00:04:09.880
flights. There are other countries that the country itself, the federal government has been banning
00:04:15.480
flights from Wuhan or from China entirely. Here in Canada we've had Air Canada and I guess now other
00:04:21.400
carriers, they have made the choice to pull back their flights but not the government and I wonder why.
00:04:28.300
Now we know Canada has a lot of problems with China right now that put at risk various trade measures and of course
00:04:33.800
put at risk the lives and safety of people like Michael Kovorg and Michael Spavor. Could we perhaps
00:04:39.560
be soft on our response to China and the coronavirus because of this? Because of our other relationship
00:04:46.220
with China? That would be very worrisome to see. That would be the further politicization of this
00:04:50.660
incredible health issue. But I'm left wondering why is it that we are so out of step with what other
00:04:56.980
countries are doing, so reticent to do it? And why are we haranguing and hectoring our citizens about
00:05:01.900
misinformation and disinformation and so forth without evidence? I don't know what they mean.
00:05:07.200
Are there people online and various online accounts that are saying completely ridiculous things that
00:05:11.980
we should not follow? Yes. But there are also epidemiologists and health experts from other
00:05:16.640
countries who are advising things be done differently than Canada is doing them. So do we trust those health
00:05:23.480
officials? We're told trust the experts. But then there are experts advocating for things
00:05:28.020
differently than Canadian health officials are asking to be done. Which is the misinformation
00:05:33.920
and the disinformation? There's a lot of confusion out there right now and I think that's only natural
00:05:40.300
given how there are so many moving parts and variables. And I just think Canadian politicians and
00:05:45.640
public health officials could be conducting themselves a little bit better right now to sort of calm the
00:05:51.180
uncertainty and to get everybody on the same page.