Juno News - March 19, 2023


Canadians deserve more information on Chinese interference allegations

Topics
Mentioned
Arrested for protesting drag queen story hour (Ft. Pastor Derek Reimer) Dutch Farmers SHOCK THE WORLD! Bad news for Trudeau

Episode Stats


Length

2 minutes

Words per minute

190.53

Word count

530

Sentence count

28


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

In this episode, I talk about what a maximal disclosure policy would look like, and why politicians need to get on board with it. I also talk about why a public inquiry into election interference by the Chinese regime is a bad idea.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
Hosts, guests, and mentioned names generated with spaCy (en_core_web_sm), reconciled against Wikidata.
00:00:00.000 When it comes to all the reports that the Beijing Communist regime has attempted to
00:00:04.300 interfere in Canada's elections on multiple levels now, it's pretty clear that most Canadians want
00:00:10.040 more information, more disclosure, not less, despite the fact that Prime Minister Justin
00:00:15.740 Trudeau is saying no, we will not have a public inquiry into this, despite all the demands for
00:00:20.700 such an inquiry. But what would a policy of maximal disclosure look like? What does it mean
00:00:26.400 to seek more information? Where do we get it from? Well, I think one great example of a politician
00:00:31.380 who's being pretty responsible on this file is British Columbia NDP Premier David Eby. He recently
00:00:37.580 said that he's very concerned, troubled by the issue, and what he wants is a full briefing from
00:00:43.360 CSIS on the matter, and to talk about what issues the BC legislature could potentially do to close
00:00:49.340 any gaps of concern. He acknowledges that election interference is primarily a federal concern, but
00:00:54.400 wants to know, is there anything I should be doing or could be doing on this file? I found Eby's
00:00:59.540 response very refreshing, because a lot of politicians, they just want to use this as a spin
00:01:04.640 opportunity. Now, we've got Conservative leader Pierre Pagliav being very strong on this file,
00:01:08.980 asking for more information to be disclosed. He's in opposition. Eby, though, is in government,
00:01:13.820 and potentially, because we have seen election interference spans now all levels of government,
00:01:18.380 municipal, provincial, federal, it's going coast to coast, we're talking about the GTA,
00:01:22.140 we're talking about Vancouver. Potentially, things could get difficult for Eby and for
00:01:27.260 the British Columbia NDP. I have no evidence to that fact. I'm just saying, because of how
00:01:31.140 wide-spanning it is, maybe they would see themselves slightly ensnared in all of this.
00:01:35.340 But Eby says, maximal disclosure, I want a briefing from CSIS. And there we go. I think that's a good
00:01:41.660 position for every politician to have. Just say, give me all the information. Tell me everything
00:01:47.540 you've got. I want to learn more. And I wish every politician all across Canada had that perspective
00:01:54.060 right now. There are some people who are saying the allegations against them are over the top,
00:01:59.100 they're not accurate, and then they're saying these are insinuations, they're against them. Okay,
00:02:03.420 well, just whatever it is, put all the information on the table, and then you can give us your response
00:02:07.980 as to why you feel what's being reported in CSIS documents is inaccurate, and we figure it out that
00:02:13.720 way. But this idea of, no, let's not have the inquiry, or let's shut things down, let's just
00:02:18.280 call these insinuations and call them false. No, we need more information, and the more information
00:02:23.440 we get, the more we can separate what's actually going on, what's the truth, what's misleading,
00:02:28.740 and get to the bottom of it. Because that's what people want right now. We're hearing former
00:02:33.400 diplomats, senior academics, people from all different political parties, non-partisan individuals,
00:02:39.040 they're just saying, let's get more information, let's get to the bottom of it. And that is the
00:02:44.660 path that we should be using to proceed.