ManoWhisper
Home
Shows
About
Search
Juno News
- December 17, 2021
Canadians should ignore government's "non-essential" travel advisory
Episode Stats
Length
36 minutes
Words per Minute
169.40588
Word Count
6,102
Sentence Count
223
Misogynist Sentences
2
Hate Speech Sentences
3
Summary
Summaries are generated with
gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ
.
Transcript
Transcript is generated with
Whisper
(
turbo
).
Misogyny classification is done with
MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny
.
Hate speech classification is done with
facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target
.
00:00:00.000
Welcome to Canada's Most Irreverent Talk Show.
00:00:06.540
This is the Andrew Lawton Show, brought to you by True North.
00:00:12.680
Coming up, Canadians narrowly avoid new travel restrictions,
00:00:16.120
some courage from a Conservative MP,
00:00:18.260
and Shelley Glover on her legal challenge against the Manitoba PC leadership race.
00:00:24.640
The Andrew Lawton Show starts right now.
00:00:30.000
Welcome to the Andrew Lawton Show.
00:00:33.100
This is Canada's Most Irreverent Talk Show here on True North.
00:00:36.740
Thursday, December 16th, 2021, just nine days away from Christmas.
00:00:41.820
I know you are all so excited.
00:00:43.420
I can hear it, or at least I can hear you throwing chairs through the window
00:00:47.160
as you realize all the stuff you have to get done in nine days.
00:00:50.340
And to make matters worse, you don't even really have nine days to do it
00:00:52.620
because you can't get anything done on Christmas Eve or on Christmas Day.
00:00:56.060
So you've really just got a week.
00:00:57.500
And I realize, as I'm saying, that I may be motivating you
00:01:00.960
to just stop listening to the show and run out to the mall.
00:01:03.580
So you can just plug your earphones in, listen on the podcast,
00:01:07.040
and enjoy as you Christmas shop.
00:01:09.640
You can only listen to All I Want for Christmas Is You so many times
00:01:13.220
before you want the dulcet tones of the Andrew Lawton Show,
00:01:16.600
or at least so I choose to believe.
00:01:18.820
Maybe I, just depending on how the show goes and how many eggnogs I have,
00:01:22.140
maybe I should do All I Want for Christmas Is You.
00:01:24.500
That'll surely boost the numbers, not.
00:01:27.160
In any case, going to be talking later on in the program with Shelley Glover,
00:01:31.800
the runner-up in the Manitoba PC leadership race,
00:01:35.020
but who has taken a claim to court that suggests she was actually the winner of the race.
00:01:39.720
We'll talk about that court challenge with her later on.
00:01:43.060
But I want to first talk about the announcement that wasn't.
00:01:47.240
I mean, remember T.S. Eliot's The World Ends With a Whimper, Not a Bang?
00:01:51.040
This was kind of like the whimper of press conferences,
00:01:54.300
and I'm not dissatisfied with that,
00:01:56.500
because I was expecting the federal government this week
00:01:59.040
would come out with a wave of travel restrictions.
00:02:02.060
Brian Lilly had a report from government sources
00:02:04.580
talking about how the Trudeau government
00:02:06.260
was considering putting in quarantine again,
00:02:10.020
even for fully vaccinated travelers,
00:02:11.960
so that if you leave the country and come back,
00:02:14.460
you've got to do the whole two-week quarantine thing.
00:02:17.080
We had reports that the government was considering putting a ban on non-essential travel again,
00:02:23.340
which could conceivably force the United States
00:02:26.100
or encourage the United States to reimpose its ban
00:02:29.800
on Canadians traveling for non-essential reasons.
00:02:32.640
So all of these things were cooking around,
00:02:34.860
and it sounds like if I piece together all of these different stories
00:02:38.420
that are all quoting their own unnamed sources,
00:02:41.000
like the Trudeau government was prepared to go there
00:02:43.760
and then ultimately decided not to,
00:02:47.100
in part because of pushback from premiers.
00:02:49.840
Trudeau on Tuesday night had a call
00:02:52.060
that was apparently quite vibrant,
00:02:54.840
one might say,
00:02:55.660
with the premiers of the various provinces,
00:02:57.420
and it sounds like there was a lot of pushback
00:02:59.740
from plunging Canada right back into March 2020 travel restrictions.
00:03:04.500
So all of this is to say what the government kind of came out with
00:03:08.220
was just like a you better not travel with the finger.
00:03:12.920
You have to do it with the finger.
00:03:13.960
Otherwise, it's not really an admonition.
00:03:16.060
So they've come out with an advisory against non-essential travel.
00:03:20.800
Now, this is something that can be summarily ignored.
00:03:23.620
The government says it's going to watch things for the next four weeks,
00:03:26.840
so there's not going to be like a winter travel ban yet.
00:03:30.040
Although, believe me when I say I am not in the least holding my breath,
00:03:34.080
that such a thing won't be imposed later on.
00:03:38.140
So why this is worth noting here is that I'm going away.
00:03:42.240
I'm literally leaving the country on the weekend,
00:03:45.640
and no matter what the government,
00:03:46.920
I mean, I don't think any restriction would have stopped me from doing it.
00:03:50.660
I think even with quarantine, I would have said,
00:03:52.320
you know what, I'm going,
00:03:53.340
and when I came back, I would have just done what I wanted.
00:03:55.520
But I can confess to that now that there isn't the quarantine or anything.
00:03:59.540
But nothing would have stopped,
00:04:01.740
because at this point, the pandemic is over.
00:04:03.400
Like, the pandemic is absolutely over.
00:04:05.720
I've had it with the Omicron fear-mongering
00:04:08.040
that just does not align with the data that we are seeing
00:04:11.240
about Omicron and what it's doing.
00:04:13.500
I'm done with all these restrictions that are yo-yoing.
00:04:16.140
I'm done with all of these public health advisors
00:04:18.160
that model just the most terrifying scenarios that never come to pass,
00:04:22.640
yet still get to continually define the direction that we take
00:04:27.140
in our pandemic response.
00:04:28.980
And I think most Canadians are in the same boat.
00:04:32.020
And this is not political.
00:04:33.960
It used to be just like the fire-breathing libertarian types like me
00:04:37.160
that were done with this.
00:04:38.100
Now everyone is.
00:04:39.040
I'm hearing from people left, right, apolitical, political, doesn't matter.
00:04:42.880
People that are saying, yeah, I'm done with this.
00:04:45.800
Especially, especially when it comes to kids in schools.
00:04:49.400
So just starting with universities for a moment,
00:04:52.680
a number of schools in Ontario, like Queen's and Western,
00:04:56.200
University of Victoria out in BC,
00:04:58.460
other institutions have abandoned their in-person exams.
00:05:03.120
And they've said, okay, we're just going to do online exams.
00:05:05.280
At the drop of a hat, they flip over.
00:05:07.220
Some schools are already going further.
00:05:09.200
York University in Toronto has said that it's going to return
00:05:12.740
to online classes for at least the first few weeks of January.
00:05:17.240
So you already have some universities that are talking about
00:05:20.940
just writing off the return to in-person classes,
00:05:23.900
which I think is supposed to happen in like the first week of January.
00:05:26.360
There's not a huge delay there.
00:05:28.200
And now you've got in Ontario as well,
00:05:30.960
school boards that are telling students,
00:05:33.860
bring home all of your stuff.
00:05:36.300
Like elementary and secondary schools,
00:05:37.880
bring home all your stuff for Christmas
00:05:39.340
because you might not be coming back.
00:05:43.280
This is the kind of thing that should make people very nervous
00:05:46.920
because what all of these people are doing
00:05:48.960
is poising themselves for a return to March 2020.
00:05:52.080
We have the Omicron variant.
00:05:53.980
They're all pretending this is new.
00:05:56.340
They're all pretending that we are exactly where we were
00:05:58.940
nearly two years ago,
00:06:00.100
looking at footage out of Wuhan and being like,
00:06:02.440
oh, well, we don't know what we're dealing with.
00:06:03.980
So we got to shut down the border.
00:06:05.240
We've got to throw in a quarantine.
00:06:06.720
We've got to shut down schools.
00:06:08.060
We got to shut down offices.
00:06:09.340
And it just doesn't match with the facts.
00:06:13.100
It just does not match with the facts.
00:06:15.300
But there are people that are just so high on lockdown
00:06:18.980
that don't want to reopen.
00:06:22.020
They don't want to get back to normal.
00:06:24.520
They don't want life to go back to the old normal
00:06:27.180
because they have a lot more purpose.
00:06:29.120
I get all of these like lockdown happy science table directors
00:06:33.000
that are driving public policy,
00:06:36.180
that are telling people we need travel restrictions
00:06:38.220
and lockdowns and closed schools and all of that.
00:06:40.140
All of these people have more purpose during the pandemic
00:06:42.980
than they've ever had in their life.
00:06:45.320
And they're merchants of doom.
00:06:47.280
That's what they are.
00:06:48.680
They're merchants of doom.
00:06:50.040
And that's working for them
00:06:51.360
because they're selling what a lot of people
00:06:54.040
in the media and in government are buying.
00:06:56.020
They're buying the doom.
00:06:57.360
There's a good market for doom.
00:06:58.720
You know what?
00:06:59.040
I wish I bought stocks in doom
00:07:00.360
because doom is about the best asset you can have right now
00:07:03.440
in your portfolio
00:07:04.600
because it just keeps coming and coming and coming.
00:07:08.260
So these merchants of doom,
00:07:10.600
profits of doom too,
00:07:11.640
but I think merchants kind of effectively characterizes it
00:07:15.800
because they are profiting off of it
00:07:17.520
in fame and notoriety and money.
00:07:19.380
What they're doing
00:07:20.320
is keeping the rest of us indefinitely locked down
00:07:24.140
for their own purpose.
00:07:26.240
And a lot of people I've said have kind of internalized this.
00:07:30.060
They've developed Stockholm syndrome.
00:07:31.680
They enjoy it.
00:07:32.980
They look to these people and say,
00:07:34.680
oh, dear leaders,
00:07:35.700
are you going to give us more lockdown?
00:07:37.580
I don't want the freedom.
00:07:38.740
I want the vaccine passport.
00:07:40.080
I want the shutdown.
00:07:40.980
I want the restrictions.
00:07:42.160
But that's even that is,
00:07:43.860
I'm slightly hopeful.
00:07:45.960
I say slightly starting to change.
00:07:49.480
People seem to be resisting this now
00:07:52.840
a lot more than they were even a few weeks ago.
00:07:56.520
And to be honest,
00:07:57.360
I think the linchpin of all of this
00:07:59.500
is the effect on kids in schools.
00:08:03.260
Because parents are,
00:08:04.240
I mean, adults can withstand a lot
00:08:06.040
and will withstand a lot.
00:08:07.820
Same as vaccine mandates.
00:08:09.140
A lot of adults that don't want to get
00:08:10.420
the COVID vaccines themselves
00:08:11.720
will get it if it means that
00:08:13.440
that's what they have to do
00:08:14.660
to go to a restaurant or to do whatever.
00:08:16.840
But the line in the sand is kids.
00:08:18.520
They're not getting their kids vaccinated.
00:08:20.100
Adults are very protective of their children.
00:08:21.940
So when there's talk about kids
00:08:24.820
not being able to go back to school,
00:08:26.860
kids being robbed of yet another school year,
00:08:29.640
a lot of parents are saying,
00:08:30.860
no, this is the last straw.
00:08:32.020
I'm just not going along with this.
00:08:33.860
I'm not playing ball.
00:08:36.200
And that's going to be something
00:08:37.480
that's very important to watch.
00:08:39.040
But I maintain that people
00:08:40.760
are finally starting to push back.
00:08:42.740
Again, not hugely.
00:08:44.060
We're not talking about mass protests
00:08:46.360
of normal apolitical people,
00:08:48.240
although we have seen some of that.
00:08:50.100
I'm talking about just people
00:08:51.560
that are kind of just on the cusp.
00:08:54.780
They're on the cusp.
00:08:55.780
And if government comes out
00:08:56.800
with another very draconian measure,
00:08:59.000
like the federal travel restrictions
00:09:00.840
could have been,
00:09:01.880
and it sounds like nearly were,
00:09:03.520
that would, I suspect at this point,
00:09:05.780
be enough to put people over the edge.
00:09:08.280
I think if Canadian families
00:09:10.220
are robbed of another Christmas,
00:09:12.480
that's going to push a lot of people
00:09:14.120
over the edge.
00:09:14.720
I think if a lot of students
00:09:16.360
are robbed of the ability
00:09:17.680
to go back to school in January,
00:09:18.940
that is going to push
00:09:20.120
a lot of people over the edge.
00:09:21.620
And it's just teetering.
00:09:23.240
It's just teetering.
00:09:24.320
It's almost there.
00:09:25.120
It's not there entirely.
00:09:26.420
And the moment could pass.
00:09:28.100
The moment could pass.
00:09:29.100
But right now,
00:09:30.060
I think governing officials
00:09:31.200
have to be very, very careful
00:09:33.740
about how they navigate
00:09:36.020
the next few weeks,
00:09:37.980
given where people are right now.
00:09:39.940
And this is something,
00:09:40.700
and again, it's entirely anecdotal.
00:09:42.820
I don't have data to back this up.
00:09:44.540
I'm just talking about this
00:09:45.920
based on what I've seen
00:09:46.980
and heard from people
00:09:47.780
in my orbits and my circles.
00:09:49.640
And do email me,
00:09:50.500
andrew at andrewlaughton.ca.
00:09:52.320
I'm curious if the same thing
00:09:54.220
is something that you're witnessing
00:09:55.420
in your own circles.
00:09:57.100
Do you find that people
00:09:58.080
that previously were okay with this
00:09:59.740
or were okay to go along with it,
00:10:01.200
at least,
00:10:01.800
are finally feeling
00:10:03.540
like they've had enough?
00:10:05.260
Or perhaps am I in
00:10:06.380
a little bit of an echo chamber?
00:10:07.620
I don't know.
00:10:08.500
I'm not making this claim
00:10:09.820
in a way that I would put,
00:10:11.120
you know,
00:10:11.360
10,000 bucks on it
00:10:12.560
and say I'm right.
00:10:13.780
It's just something
00:10:14.560
that I'm noticing
00:10:15.260
and I'm slightly hopeful about.
00:10:18.040
But I'm qualifying that
00:10:19.340
by putting the emphasis
00:10:20.900
on the slightly.
00:10:22.520
One thing I will say on this too,
00:10:24.460
because again,
00:10:24.920
the federal government's position
00:10:26.400
right now is just
00:10:27.860
you better not travel
00:10:29.320
if it's not essential.
00:10:30.440
But I mean,
00:10:31.080
ultimately,
00:10:31.380
you get to decide for yourself.
00:10:32.780
Like I may think of Hawaii.
00:10:33.980
I'm not going to Hawaii.
00:10:35.000
Actually,
00:10:35.220
I should go to Hawaii.
00:10:36.020
That's not essential
00:10:36.960
to a lot of people.
00:10:37.820
But if I decide I want to go,
00:10:39.520
you better believe
00:10:40.160
it's going to be essential
00:10:41.200
if the government is saying
00:10:42.500
that all non-essential travel
00:10:44.200
should be ceased.
00:10:46.160
But what is going to happen here
00:10:48.140
is the government
00:10:49.340
is going to find
00:10:50.020
that people are not going
00:10:50.840
to cancel their vacations
00:10:52.140
based on just the finger wagging.
00:10:53.980
You better not go anywhere.
00:10:55.260
So that is potentially
00:10:56.700
going to cause them
00:10:57.720
to ramp things up.
00:10:59.360
But again,
00:11:00.040
if the government
00:11:00.580
is looking at a political climate
00:11:01.920
that's shifting,
00:11:02.580
that may,
00:11:03.680
may cause them
00:11:04.600
to take a step back.
00:11:05.340
I don't have a lot of hope on this,
00:11:06.980
but something to watch.
00:11:09.240
Now,
00:11:09.460
interestingly enough,
00:11:10.220
I got to give a credit
00:11:11.080
where it's due here
00:11:11.780
because I found
00:11:12.860
that the conservatives
00:11:13.820
have just been completely
00:11:15.320
and utterly silent
00:11:16.560
on a lot of the big issues,
00:11:18.820
the issues that really matter,
00:11:20.520
like vaccine mandates,
00:11:22.120
like vaccine passports,
00:11:23.540
like travel restrictions.
00:11:24.560
They've been,
00:11:25.200
they've been kind of just opposing
00:11:26.560
for the sake of opposing.
00:11:28.160
And in some cases,
00:11:29.240
not even.
00:11:30.380
I mean,
00:11:30.780
Aaron O'Toole has,
00:11:32.260
was taking pride
00:11:33.240
in the fact
00:11:33.720
that his view
00:11:34.480
on Bill 21,
00:11:36.340
which is the horrifically
00:11:37.820
anti-religious freedom bill
00:11:39.280
in Quebec,
00:11:40.140
his position is the same
00:11:41.340
as the prime minister's.
00:11:42.160
That was his defense.
00:11:43.380
Yeah, yeah,
00:11:43.760
I think the same as Trudeau.
00:11:45.040
I'm not taking a stand
00:11:46.000
for religious liberty on this
00:11:47.740
because again,
00:11:48.340
Quebec can do no wrong
00:11:49.700
in the eyes
00:11:50.780
of the political class.
00:11:52.920
And I talked about
00:11:53.860
earlier on in the show,
00:11:55.100
I think it was
00:11:55.480
about three,
00:11:56.260
four weeks back,
00:11:57.280
that all of the conservatives
00:11:58.920
that were in a position
00:12:00.280
to speak out
00:12:00.840
against vaccine mandates
00:12:01.800
were conveniently sidelined.
00:12:03.940
You may remember
00:12:04.640
I talked about
00:12:05.340
the sheer volume
00:12:06.640
of MPs
00:12:07.340
in the conservative caucus
00:12:08.360
who were given
00:12:08.860
shadow cabinet roles,
00:12:10.460
deputy shadow cabinet roles,
00:12:12.020
leadership positions.
00:12:12.880
And it was just
00:12:13.780
a small subset,
00:12:15.780
a small subset
00:12:16.820
who were not,
00:12:17.500
I think it was about
00:12:17.980
a third
00:12:18.480
that were denied
00:12:19.780
some portfolio.
00:12:21.460
And of those,
00:12:22.780
of the unaligned,
00:12:24.220
the unaffiliated,
00:12:25.420
one of them gave
00:12:26.480
a very passionate defense
00:12:28.220
of individual choice,
00:12:30.220
of people that are
00:12:31.100
losing their jobs
00:12:31.920
because of vaccine mandates.
00:12:33.100
That was Jeremy Patser,
00:12:34.500
a backbench conservative MP.
00:12:36.860
And you can see him,
00:12:37.420
you can see in the video
00:12:38.220
I'm about to show you,
00:12:39.320
they shove him like
00:12:40.240
to the way,
00:12:40.880
way, way back.
00:12:41.660
Like he's right up
00:12:42.300
against the wall.
00:12:43.020
I don't even think
00:12:43.500
he can lean back
00:12:44.220
in his chair
00:12:45.120
without hitting the wall.
00:12:46.440
That's how little
00:12:47.160
the conservatives
00:12:47.720
want to hear
00:12:48.440
what this guy has to say.
00:12:49.820
But he took a stand.
00:12:51.020
He took a stand
00:12:51.760
in a statement given
00:12:52.800
in the House of Commons.
00:12:53.960
Take a look.
00:12:54.720
Mr. Speaker,
00:12:55.420
I rise in the House today
00:12:56.380
on behalf of thousands
00:12:57.340
of workers across Canada,
00:12:58.740
from members of our military
00:13:00.180
to first responders,
00:13:01.640
nurses,
00:13:02.220
to educators,
00:13:03.360
to janitorial staff
00:13:04.480
who have or are facing
00:13:05.880
the loss of their jobs
00:13:06.900
as a result of vaccine mandates.
00:13:09.080
These are our neighbors,
00:13:10.360
our colleagues,
00:13:11.020
our fellow citizens,
00:13:12.100
many who have sacrificed
00:13:13.160
and given so much
00:13:14.180
to build up our country
00:13:15.220
and many who have served us
00:13:16.640
throughout the worst
00:13:17.260
of this pandemic.
00:13:18.580
Yet now,
00:13:19.040
in the blink of an eye,
00:13:20.080
these same individuals
00:13:21.020
that we once praised
00:13:21.960
as heroes
00:13:22.560
are being treated
00:13:23.760
as second-class citizens
00:13:25.300
for a decision
00:13:26.040
that every Canadian
00:13:27.160
should have the freedom
00:13:28.320
to make for themselves.
00:13:29.500
And to add insult to injury,
00:13:31.900
this government
00:13:32.560
is denying them EI,
00:13:34.100
money that they have
00:13:34.820
long contributed to
00:13:35.900
and is rightfully theirs.
00:13:37.820
Mr. Speaker,
00:13:38.880
it's a disgrace
00:13:39.700
to see how this Liberal government
00:13:41.220
is intent on stripping
00:13:42.600
Canadians of their dignity
00:13:43.780
and sending a rift of division
00:13:45.540
from coast to coast.
00:13:47.600
To all the Canadians
00:13:48.380
who have lost their jobs
00:13:49.580
and to all the constituents
00:13:50.740
who have written out,
00:13:52.040
I hear you
00:13:52.780
and I will continue
00:13:53.720
to stand for you
00:13:54.560
and for this country,
00:13:55.980
the true north,
00:13:57.160
strong and free.
00:13:59.500
The Honourable Member
00:14:01.560
for New Market,
00:14:02.900
Aurora.
00:14:03.400
And I don't know if you noted,
00:14:04.280
Jeremy Patzer
00:14:05.160
got two standing ovations
00:14:06.600
from the MPs
00:14:07.640
on either side of him,
00:14:08.760
also on the
00:14:10.280
no-portfolio list
00:14:12.220
that I've put together
00:14:13.100
of Conservative MPs.
00:14:14.480
One of them,
00:14:14.840
Chris Workington,
00:14:15.620
who has been fairly vocal
00:14:17.140
in speaking up
00:14:18.400
against the leadership issues
00:14:19.720
in the Conservative caucus.
00:14:21.400
But he took a stand.
00:14:22.840
And you know what?
00:14:23.420
Good on Jeremy Patzer.
00:14:24.540
I don't know how long
00:14:25.300
he's going to be
00:14:25.880
kicking around
00:14:26.500
in the Conservative caucus.
00:14:27.740
If he starts talking
00:14:29.040
about things like freedom
00:14:30.060
and civil liberties,
00:14:30.980
he might not have a place
00:14:31.880
in the Conservative caucus
00:14:33.440
at this point.
00:14:34.140
I certainly hope
00:14:35.020
I'm wrong about that,
00:14:36.000
but good on him
00:14:36.660
for taking a stand.
00:14:38.800
Again,
00:14:39.180
all of the people
00:14:39.860
that we were supposed
00:14:41.260
to bang our pots and pans
00:14:43.000
and clang our household
00:14:44.540
implements to support,
00:14:46.120
all of a sudden,
00:14:47.140
they are the people
00:14:47.940
we're supposed to
00:14:48.540
shove out to the curb
00:14:49.260
if they don't want
00:14:49.780
to get vaccinated
00:14:50.380
against COVID
00:14:51.040
for whatever reason.
00:14:52.200
It doesn't matter
00:14:52.660
what that reason is.
00:14:53.640
We just do not allow people
00:14:54.900
to make their own choices now.
00:14:57.360
A lot of good feedback
00:14:58.240
to my interview
00:14:59.240
earlier this week
00:15:00.100
with Julie Panessi
00:15:01.020
about that very idea.
00:15:02.500
She said,
00:15:02.860
no, I'm not anti-vax,
00:15:04.000
I'm anti-vaccine mandate.
00:15:05.900
And we have a political climate
00:15:07.260
and culture
00:15:07.760
that assists on
00:15:08.600
conflating those two.
00:15:10.020
So when there is
00:15:10.780
the rare voice
00:15:11.820
in a political party
00:15:13.100
speaking up against
00:15:14.160
that narrative,
00:15:15.240
I think they deserve
00:15:15.880
to be commended.
00:15:16.700
So well done,
00:15:17.840
Jeremy Patzer.
00:15:18.700
We've got to take a break here.
00:15:20.700
When we come back,
00:15:21.640
more of the Andrew Lawton Show
00:15:22.720
here on True North.
00:15:23.600
You're tuned in
00:15:27.800
to the Andrew Lawton Show.
00:15:32.060
Welcome back
00:15:32.860
to the Andrew Lawton Show
00:15:34.280
here on True North.
00:15:35.540
Going to take a little bit
00:15:36.700
of a jaunt
00:15:37.120
one province west
00:15:38.300
of my current locale
00:15:39.460
to Manitoba.
00:15:41.180
Interestingly enough,
00:15:42.100
maybe it's not interesting
00:15:43.300
to you,
00:15:43.980
but it's interesting to me.
00:15:45.800
Barely, actually.
00:15:46.720
I don't know why I'm sharing it,
00:15:47.580
but now I have to
00:15:48.220
because I've started
00:15:48.780
down this road.
00:15:50.160
Manitoba is the only province
00:15:52.080
in Confederation
00:15:53.260
I've not visited.
00:15:54.640
Now, I haven't done
00:15:55.420
two of the three territories.
00:15:57.020
I've not done
00:15:57.500
Nunavut or Northwest Territories,
00:15:58.720
but I've been to
00:15:59.120
every single province
00:16:00.120
except Manitoba.
00:16:02.240
And one of my friends
00:16:03.040
said on principle,
00:16:04.340
I should just avoid
00:16:05.260
going to Manitoba
00:16:06.120
and just like leave that
00:16:07.100
as like the whole
00:16:07.720
in Central Canada
00:16:08.560
that I've never been to.
00:16:10.060
I don't know.
00:16:10.640
I mean, if I am going
00:16:11.500
to go to Manitoba,
00:16:12.160
I don't want it to be right now,
00:16:13.380
but I'll happily talk
00:16:14.220
to someone from Manitoba.
00:16:16.160
The PC party of Manitoba
00:16:18.580
had a leadership race
00:16:19.900
culminating on October 30th
00:16:22.400
at which Heather Stephenson,
00:16:24.420
a longtime MLA,
00:16:25.880
was crowned not just
00:16:27.440
the leader of the PCs,
00:16:28.480
but also the premier
00:16:29.540
of Manitoba,
00:16:31.000
replacing Brian Pallister,
00:16:32.740
who had stepped down earlier.
00:16:35.300
The race was fraught
00:16:37.000
with allegations
00:16:37.860
of irregularities.
00:16:38.980
You had members
00:16:39.540
not receiving their ballots
00:16:40.640
by mail.
00:16:41.300
You had discrepancies
00:16:42.080
about the count.
00:16:42.860
You had all of these things
00:16:44.580
that ultimately led
00:16:45.740
to Shelley Glover,
00:16:47.000
who was the runner-up
00:16:48.200
by a very small march
00:16:49.720
and saying that
00:16:50.680
she was basically robbed
00:16:52.540
out of a victory
00:16:53.800
that was hers.
00:16:54.860
She brought a claim to court
00:16:56.180
that was heard
00:16:57.160
by a judge last week
00:16:58.860
with a decision
00:16:59.460
expected any day now.
00:17:01.360
Shelley Glover,
00:17:02.000
the former Conservative
00:17:02.980
Member of Parliament
00:17:03.780
and former PC leadership
00:17:05.120
candidate,
00:17:05.720
joins me now.
00:17:06.760
Shelley, good to talk to you.
00:17:07.720
Thanks for coming on today.
00:17:09.680
Yeah, I'm happy to be here.
00:17:10.940
Thank you for calling.
00:17:11.760
So I want to go back
00:17:13.260
to the basics here.
00:17:14.340
Obviously,
00:17:15.120
when you are seeking
00:17:16.540
the leadership
00:17:17.260
of a governing party,
00:17:18.960
the stakes are a lot higher
00:17:20.140
than they are
00:17:20.780
in normal leadership races
00:17:22.500
because you aren't just
00:17:23.260
going to the top of the party,
00:17:24.700
but you're going to
00:17:25.600
directly into the premier seat
00:17:27.160
if you win.
00:17:28.380
Why did you want to get
00:17:29.680
in this race
00:17:30.260
in the first place?
00:17:32.620
Okay, well,
00:17:33.620
Andrew,
00:17:34.920
the race originally
00:17:37.500
started off
00:17:40.020
with an appearance
00:17:42.560
as if some people
00:17:44.740
in the party
00:17:45.400
were wanting
00:17:46.980
to keep everyone out.
00:17:48.640
Okay, so
00:17:49.180
I got a phone call
00:17:51.180
from one of the people
00:17:53.720
who was actually involved
00:17:54.940
in that ploy
00:17:57.820
and he told me
00:18:01.280
that this plan
00:18:02.700
had been underway
00:18:03.560
for some time.
00:18:05.640
Of course,
00:18:05.960
I was shocked
00:18:06.780
and thought,
00:18:07.660
you know,
00:18:08.200
this could never happen
00:18:09.480
in my party,
00:18:10.280
but unfortunately,
00:18:12.680
he suggested
00:18:13.860
I watch
00:18:14.620
for a,
00:18:15.740
an announcement
00:18:18.720
by one of the MLAs
00:18:21.080
and it would include
00:18:22.540
mostly all of the other MLAs
00:18:25.300
endorsing that person.
00:18:27.560
So, of course,
00:18:28.660
I did see that happen
00:18:30.240
and I did see
00:18:32.780
the rules come out
00:18:33.660
shortly thereafter,
00:18:34.860
which were orchestrated
00:18:36.420
and manipulated
00:18:37.480
by the MLAs
00:18:39.040
and executive council
00:18:41.180
so that they increased
00:18:43.000
the entry fee
00:18:43.860
to $25,000
00:18:45.560
and only $5,000
00:18:46.640
refundable
00:18:47.320
and shortened the race
00:18:49.240
to a 60-day race
00:18:51.000
from what's normally
00:18:51.740
a six-month race
00:18:52.780
and that was an attempt,
00:18:55.040
an obvious attempt
00:18:55.800
to keep everybody
00:18:56.580
out of the race
00:18:57.160
and I don't believe in that.
00:18:58.640
I believe our party
00:18:59.380
needed a race.
00:19:00.820
I believe we were
00:19:02.220
very much in need
00:19:03.460
of new members,
00:19:04.680
new money,
00:19:05.740
excitement for the party
00:19:07.020
because we were
00:19:07.840
really down in the polls
00:19:09.420
given some of the things
00:19:11.880
that Manitobans
00:19:13.260
disliked about
00:19:14.160
our former Premier
00:19:15.780
Brian Pallister.
00:19:17.360
So, this was an opportunity
00:19:18.640
in my mind
00:19:19.400
to get the party
00:19:21.660
back to a place
00:19:22.800
where we were judged
00:19:23.840
in a new way
00:19:25.400
and unfortunately
00:19:26.800
a coronation
00:19:28.540
was underway
00:19:29.360
and I decided
00:19:31.020
to run with many others
00:19:32.340
that I had encouraged
00:19:33.240
to run
00:19:33.720
in an effort
00:19:35.080
to stop
00:19:36.200
the coronation
00:19:37.020
and make sure
00:19:37.860
that our party
00:19:38.400
benefited from
00:19:39.200
the advantages
00:19:39.800
of having this race.
00:19:41.420
And then we fast forward
00:19:42.740
to the day
00:19:43.640
the results were announced
00:19:44.820
on October 30th
00:19:46.280
so just about
00:19:46.780
six weeks ago
00:19:47.700
and out of 16,000
00:19:49.440
some odd ballots cast
00:19:50.700
the official tally
00:19:51.900
had MLA Heather Stephenson
00:19:53.760
now the Premier
00:19:54.640
of Manitoba
00:19:55.420
with a lead
00:19:56.960
above you
00:19:57.460
by 363 votes.
00:19:59.700
Now, I want to bring us
00:20:01.020
up to speed here
00:20:01.840
because you obviously
00:20:02.700
were in court
00:20:03.840
your lawyer was arguing
00:20:04.900
that there were
00:20:05.840
a number of irregularities
00:20:07.000
that the count
00:20:07.620
basically was not valid
00:20:09.260
so just in the interest
00:20:10.420
of clarity
00:20:10.860
your position
00:20:11.460
is that you should
00:20:12.540
be the Premier
00:20:13.060
right now, correct?
00:20:15.120
Well, of course
00:20:15.740
I was not sworn in
00:20:18.300
as Premier
00:20:18.720
but I believe
00:20:19.660
I was the Premier
00:20:20.640
designate
00:20:21.300
I believe I won
00:20:22.340
that election
00:20:23.000
and it's based
00:20:24.560
on a number of things
00:20:25.840
and just remember
00:20:27.820
that, you know
00:20:28.880
the ploy
00:20:30.220
to keep everyone
00:20:31.040
out of this race
00:20:32.020
continued right
00:20:33.580
through to the end
00:20:34.580
in fact
00:20:36.200
I was sitting there
00:20:41.220
listening to the results
00:20:42.340
knowing that my magic number
00:20:44.520
which we all know
00:20:45.260
is however many ballots
00:20:47.620
were to be counted
00:20:48.680
half of that
00:20:50.360
plus one
00:20:51.340
is the magic number
00:20:52.620
that any candidate
00:20:53.520
looks at
00:20:54.440
before hearing
00:20:56.420
the results
00:20:57.160
because
00:20:57.660
you know
00:20:59.060
what number
00:20:59.640
you need
00:21:00.580
to win
00:21:01.100
in doing that math
00:21:02.920
so my magic number
00:21:04.460
was in fact
00:21:07.100
8,023
00:21:09.820
and so
00:21:11.420
when they announced
00:21:13.360
8,042
00:21:15.000
I thought I had won
00:21:17.100
and then all of a sudden
00:21:19.520
they announced
00:21:21.080
Heather Stephenson
00:21:21.920
as having
00:21:22.500
8,405
00:21:23.920
and I couldn't
00:21:25.380
understand
00:21:26.080
where these extra
00:21:27.080
500 votes
00:21:27.800
came from
00:21:28.260
so that's why
00:21:29.280
we ended up
00:21:29.820
in court
00:21:30.320
not only that
00:21:32.400
I mean ballots
00:21:33.160
didn't get out
00:21:33.740
to people
00:21:34.280
mainly my
00:21:35.260
voters
00:21:36.320
there were a number
00:21:38.480
of irregularities
00:21:39.540
including taking
00:21:40.340
the ballot boxes
00:21:41.300
out of the room
00:21:42.300
unsealed
00:21:43.140
even though
00:21:43.680
our
00:21:44.160
scrutineers
00:21:46.800
demanded
00:21:47.300
that they be
00:21:47.960
sealed
00:21:48.340
and you know
00:21:50.240
continuity
00:21:50.740
wasn't maintained
00:21:51.600
because our
00:21:52.020
scrutineers
00:21:52.460
weren't allowed
00:21:52.900
to follow
00:21:53.400
the ballots
00:21:53.940
out of the room
00:21:54.660
it was just
00:21:56.000
it was a mess
00:21:56.940
so I'm waiting
00:21:58.660
for a court
00:21:59.480
decision on Friday
00:22:00.680
and hopefully
00:22:01.980
we will see
00:22:03.060
this fixed
00:22:04.200
now your magic
00:22:06.360
number
00:22:06.880
so you
00:22:07.640
you reach this
00:22:08.440
by 50%
00:22:09.440
plus one
00:22:10.160
of the ballots
00:22:11.000
cast presumably
00:22:11.800
how did you get
00:22:12.600
that ballot
00:22:13.620
cast
00:22:14.120
ballots cast number
00:22:15.120
because that seems
00:22:15.840
to be a key
00:22:16.660
discrepancy here
00:22:17.840
between your case
00:22:19.280
and the PC
00:22:19.960
party's case
00:22:20.660
how many ballots
00:22:21.320
were actually cast
00:22:22.280
and the source
00:22:23.120
of that number
00:22:23.760
well you know
00:22:25.240
we received
00:22:27.500
at
00:22:27.900
it was
00:22:29.160
12 27
00:22:30.320
a.m
00:22:31.180
the day of the vote
00:22:32.260
so October 30th
00:22:33.320
we received
00:22:34.180
the final
00:22:35.300
voting list
00:22:36.460
and that's what
00:22:37.300
it was called
00:22:37.940
the final voting
00:22:39.200
list
00:22:39.560
from
00:22:40.900
the PC
00:22:42.360
party
00:22:42.780
from Stu
00:22:43.920
Charles
00:22:44.400
when you
00:22:45.920
when you look
00:22:46.380
when you look
00:22:46.400
at that final
00:22:47.020
list
00:22:47.340
16,045
00:22:48.860
is the number
00:22:49.900
of voters
00:22:50.740
who cast
00:22:51.760
ballots
00:22:52.440
and so
00:22:54.500
and then
00:22:55.100
at 1 54
00:22:57.340
a.m
00:22:58.160
same day
00:22:59.240
we even got
00:23:00.140
a breakdown
00:23:01.220
from a PC
00:23:02.780
party
00:23:03.180
member
00:23:04.200
that's Jason
00:23:04.800
Hamlin
00:23:05.340
a breakdown
00:23:06.640
of every day
00:23:07.860
that
00:23:08.300
our scrutineers
00:23:10.060
had attended
00:23:10.700
to
00:23:11.480
Scarrow and
00:23:12.920
Donald
00:23:13.140
which is
00:23:13.820
our
00:23:14.720
the party's
00:23:16.980
accounting firm
00:23:18.020
for over 20
00:23:18.920
years
00:23:19.300
and
00:23:20.720
that
00:23:22.300
that seemed
00:23:23.280
to suggest
00:23:23.740
as well
00:23:24.180
that
00:23:24.480
we were
00:23:25.240
nowhere near
00:23:26.240
that number
00:23:27.440
that was
00:23:28.220
presented
00:23:28.720
as the final
00:23:29.720
results
00:23:30.280
the night
00:23:31.020
of the counting
00:23:31.600
and
00:23:31.980
I can tell
00:23:32.940
you
00:23:33.300
my
00:23:34.980
co-campaign
00:23:35.960
manager
00:23:36.520
Lawrence
00:23:37.240
had been
00:23:37.820
at every
00:23:38.300
one of
00:23:38.700
those
00:23:39.060
meetings
00:23:40.000
to verify
00:23:40.580
votes
00:23:41.000
etc
00:23:41.340
except
00:23:41.640
for two
00:23:42.240
and Dale
00:23:42.860
smelts
00:23:43.560
from my
00:23:43.960
team
00:23:44.300
was there
00:23:44.620
those two
00:23:45.080
days
00:23:45.340
and our
00:23:45.840
numbers
00:23:46.180
all added
00:23:46.700
up
00:23:46.940
very similarly
00:23:48.020
to
00:23:48.620
Jason
00:23:49.540
Hamlin
00:23:50.060
so
00:23:50.420
we actually
00:23:52.460
had numbers
00:23:53.580
all over the
00:23:54.120
place
00:23:54.400
I mean
00:23:54.700
we had
00:23:55.120
Jason
00:23:55.420
Hamlin
00:23:55.900
we had
00:23:56.540
what the
00:23:57.460
party said
00:23:57.980
was the
00:23:58.300
number
00:23:58.600
we had
00:23:59.800
the final
00:24:00.920
voting list
00:24:01.740
number
00:24:02.220
we had
00:24:03.100
the results
00:24:04.020
in the
00:24:04.580
room
00:24:04.980
from our
00:24:05.880
lead
00:24:06.300
scrutineer
00:24:06.820
who had
00:24:07.060
gone to
00:24:07.380
every
00:24:07.580
table
00:24:07.900
and added
00:24:08.360
all of
00:24:08.700
those
00:24:08.840
up
00:24:09.100
that was
00:24:10.160
another
00:24:10.460
number
00:24:10.860
and
00:24:11.200
even
00:24:12.440
in the
00:24:12.900
room
00:24:13.200
even
00:24:13.960
Heather's
00:24:14.780
own
00:24:15.160
scrutineers
00:24:15.900
added up
00:24:16.760
all the
00:24:17.140
numbers
00:24:17.540
from the
00:24:18.160
ballots
00:24:19.460
that had
00:24:20.140
been
00:24:20.440
counted
00:24:21.240
because we
00:24:21.780
had tally
00:24:22.180
sheets
00:24:22.480
at every
00:24:22.820
table
00:24:23.180
and
00:24:23.980
they
00:24:24.540
were
00:24:24.760
upset
00:24:25.180
because
00:24:25.600
they
00:24:25.880
realized
00:24:26.640
that
00:24:27.520
she
00:24:27.720
had
00:24:27.900
lost
00:24:28.340
so
00:24:29.140
I
00:24:29.680
was
00:24:29.880
actually
00:24:30.180
the
00:24:30.340
winner
00:24:30.540
in
00:24:30.740
that
00:24:30.940
room
00:24:31.260
for
00:24:31.600
two
00:24:31.820
hours
00:24:32.180
while
00:24:32.380
they
00:24:32.540
locked
00:24:32.800
them
00:24:32.960
in
00:24:33.120
there
00:24:33.340
so
00:24:34.020
this
00:24:34.920
is
00:24:35.200
highly
00:24:35.960
unusual
00:24:36.480
and
00:24:36.860
irregular
00:24:37.300
and
00:24:37.920
this
00:24:38.160
is
00:24:38.320
why
00:24:38.680
it
00:24:39.160
led
00:24:39.360
to
00:24:39.580
this
00:24:39.820
court
00:24:40.080
case
00:24:40.360
that
00:24:40.560
we
00:24:40.720
are
00:24:40.880
now
00:24:41.160
waiting
00:24:41.460
for
00:24:41.660
decision
00:24:42.080
on
00:24:42.320
now
00:24:43.300
the
00:24:43.480
party's
00:24:44.000
defense
00:24:44.580
of the
00:24:45.300
discrepancy
00:24:46.000
on the
00:24:46.340
membership
00:24:46.740
list
00:24:47.200
was basically
00:24:48.160
incompetence
00:24:49.020
they just
00:24:49.360
said oh
00:24:49.700
no we
00:24:50.080
released a
00:24:51.040
list that
00:24:51.480
was full
00:24:52.120
of mistakes
00:24:52.800
here
00:24:53.040
now
00:24:53.260
I mean
00:24:53.800
generally
00:24:54.160
speaking
00:24:54.540
when you
00:24:54.820
have
00:24:55.020
something
00:24:55.260
like this
00:24:55.680
you're
00:24:55.980
talking
00:24:56.320
about
00:24:56.640
malice
00:24:57.140
or
00:24:57.360
incompetence
00:24:58.280
you
00:24:58.460
don't
00:24:58.720
buy
00:24:59.100
that
00:24:59.760
it
00:24:59.880
was
00:25:00.100
just
00:25:00.460
the
00:25:00.740
latter
00:25:01.120
in
00:25:01.320
this
00:25:01.480
case
00:25:01.860
I
00:25:03.300
don't
00:25:03.480
buy
00:25:03.720
it
00:25:03.960
and
00:25:04.240
here's
00:25:04.480
why
00:25:04.760
Andrew
00:25:05.100
so
00:25:06.200
from
00:25:06.700
day
00:25:06.920
one
00:25:07.300
we
00:25:08.120
tried
00:25:08.940
to
00:25:09.100
follow
00:25:09.320
every
00:25:09.580
rule
00:25:09.760
you know
00:25:10.040
I'm
00:25:10.220
a law
00:25:10.500
and order
00:25:10.840
person
00:25:11.240
having
00:25:11.620
served
00:25:12.360
28 years
00:25:12.980
with the
00:25:13.320
Winnipeg
00:25:13.700
police
00:25:13.980
service
00:25:14.400
that is
00:25:15.920
my
00:25:16.180
character
00:25:16.600
I
00:25:17.020
stand up
00:25:18.640
for
00:25:18.820
injustice
00:25:19.240
I
00:25:19.860
call out
00:25:20.500
people who
00:25:20.880
are not
00:25:21.180
following
00:25:21.540
the
00:25:21.720
rules
00:25:21.960
and I
00:25:22.240
can
00:25:22.380
tell
00:25:22.600
you
00:25:22.880
we
00:25:23.500
tried
00:25:23.880
to
00:25:24.040
follow
00:25:24.260
every
00:25:24.620
rule
00:25:24.980
although
00:25:25.440
my
00:25:29.540
opposition
00:25:30.620
didn't
00:25:31.880
follow
00:25:32.120
all the
00:25:32.460
rules
00:25:32.760
so
00:25:33.460
you know
00:25:34.400
it was
00:25:34.980
really
00:25:35.500
important
00:25:36.500
to me
00:25:36.960
that
00:25:37.220
we
00:25:37.900
cross
00:25:39.420
our
00:25:39.860
T's
00:25:40.260
and
00:25:40.500
dot
00:25:40.780
our
00:25:41.000
I's
00:25:41.580
and
00:25:42.580
when
00:25:43.180
it
00:25:43.320
comes
00:25:43.680
to
00:25:44.120
all
00:25:44.680
of
00:25:44.860
the
00:25:45.020
irregularities
00:25:45.940
all
00:25:46.280
these
00:25:46.620
mistakes
00:25:47.540
that
00:25:47.780
you're
00:25:47.940
talking
00:25:48.300
about
00:25:48.720
this
00:25:49.700
claim
00:25:50.860
that
00:25:51.080
it
00:25:51.300
was
00:25:51.440
incompetency
00:25:52.400
and
00:25:53.000
there
00:25:53.720
was
00:25:54.000
no
00:25:54.200
malice
00:25:54.620
well
00:25:55.380
I
00:25:55.600
called
00:25:55.960
for
00:25:56.220
an
00:25:56.340
extension
00:25:56.840
a
00:25:57.920
couple
00:25:58.100
weeks
00:25:58.380
before
00:25:59.000
the
00:26:00.600
count
00:26:01.240
happened
00:26:01.740
and
00:26:02.640
every
00:26:03.180
single
00:26:03.560
person
00:26:04.060
that
00:26:05.140
they
00:26:05.300
talked
00:26:05.640
to
00:26:05.940
from
00:26:06.540
the
00:26:06.760
PC
00:26:07.100
party
00:26:07.580
from
00:26:08.660
the
00:26:09.040
MLAs
00:26:09.860
and
00:26:10.680
even
00:26:10.940
Premier
00:26:11.400
Gertsen
00:26:11.920
at the
00:26:12.240
time
00:26:12.560
they
00:26:13.620
all
00:26:13.860
said
00:26:14.120
well
00:26:14.320
the
00:26:14.480
party
00:26:14.760
has
00:26:14.980
said
00:26:15.160
they're
00:26:15.300
going
00:26:15.400
to
00:26:15.460
get
00:26:15.620
their
00:26:15.920
ducks
00:26:16.720
in
00:26:16.860
a
00:26:16.980
row
00:26:17.160
and
00:26:17.320
it's
00:26:17.500
going
00:26:17.640
to
00:26:17.700
be
00:26:17.960
a
00:26:18.480
fair
00:26:18.960
and
00:26:19.480
and
00:26:20.000
a
00:26:21.040
fit
00:26:21.400
race
00:26:22.040
they
00:26:22.540
will
00:26:22.700
have
00:26:23.000
everything
00:26:23.500
tightened
00:26:25.200
up
00:26:25.520
by the
00:26:25.880
time
00:26:26.200
the
00:26:26.360
count
00:26:26.560
happens
00:26:27.020
well
00:26:27.260
I knew
00:26:27.600
that
00:26:27.740
was
00:26:27.900
impossible
00:26:28.480
because
00:26:29.020
we
00:26:29.280
had
00:26:29.480
thousands
00:26:30.080
of
00:26:30.400
people
00:26:30.680
in
00:26:30.860
the
00:26:30.980
rural
00:26:31.180
communities
00:26:31.700
who
00:26:32.280
had
00:26:32.420
come
00:26:32.720
to
00:26:32.940
the
00:26:33.140
city
00:26:33.480
two
00:26:34.040
or
00:26:34.200
three
00:26:34.360
times
00:26:34.960
trying to
00:26:36.120
get
00:26:36.260
ballots
00:26:36.820
they
00:26:37.900
they
00:26:37.920
were
00:26:38.060
calling
00:26:38.440
constantly
00:26:39.180
weren't
00:26:39.800
getting
00:26:40.040
answers
00:26:40.500
so
00:26:40.940
if
00:26:41.600
this
00:26:41.920
was
00:26:42.680
not
00:26:43.360
malice
00:26:44.340
why
00:26:45.080
on
00:26:45.340
earth
00:26:45.820
did
00:26:46.320
they
00:26:46.480
not
00:26:46.860
postpone
00:26:47.700
and
00:26:48.060
get
00:26:48.400
an
00:26:48.560
extension
00:26:48.960
so
00:26:49.240
that
00:26:49.400
all
00:26:49.720
members
00:26:50.100
rights
00:26:50.440
were
00:26:50.660
observed
00:26:51.100
had
00:26:52.300
they
00:26:52.480
done
00:26:52.760
that
00:26:53.020
we
00:26:53.180
wouldn't
00:26:53.340
be
00:26:53.500
in
00:26:53.700
court
00:26:53.880
today
00:26:54.220
now
00:26:55.860
do
00:26:56.080
you
00:26:56.220
think
00:26:56.460
that
00:26:56.840
Heather
00:26:57.340
Stephenson
00:26:58.040
was
00:26:58.780
involved
00:26:59.520
in
00:27:00.080
the
00:27:00.300
behavior
00:27:00.700
that
00:27:00.960
you're
00:27:01.140
alleging
00:27:01.520
here
00:27:01.720
do
00:27:01.860
you
00:27:01.920
think
00:27:02.040
she
00:27:02.180
was
00:27:02.340
simply
00:27:02.600
the
00:27:02.880
beneficiary
00:27:03.560
of
00:27:03.780
it
00:27:03.960
you
00:27:05.240
know
00:27:05.400
I
00:27:05.740
I
00:27:06.340
don't
00:27:06.620
know
00:27:06.920
I
00:27:07.420
don't
00:27:07.700
know
00:27:08.060
and
00:27:10.180
at
00:27:10.280
this
00:27:10.460
point
00:27:10.660
it
00:27:10.800
doesn't
00:27:11.020
matter
00:27:11.340
it
00:27:11.960
doesn't
00:27:12.160
matter
00:27:12.380
who
00:27:12.600
is
00:27:12.760
involved
00:27:13.100
in
00:27:13.320
it
00:27:13.500
we
00:27:13.880
need
00:27:14.040
to
00:27:14.180
fix
00:27:14.420
it
00:27:14.660
and
00:27:15.180
this
00:27:15.380
is
00:27:15.520
all
00:27:15.680
about
00:27:15.900
democracy
00:27:16.440
it's
00:27:16.700
not
00:27:16.860
about
00:27:17.080
blame
00:27:17.540
it's
00:27:18.440
about
00:27:18.760
democracy
00:27:19.500
and
00:27:19.720
making
00:27:20.000
sure
00:27:20.440
that
00:27:20.940
all
00:27:21.380
of
00:27:21.520
our
00:27:21.640
members
00:27:22.060
have
00:27:22.440
a
00:27:22.600
right
00:27:22.820
to
00:27:23.040
vote
00:27:23.400
which
00:27:23.920
was
00:27:24.120
not
00:27:24.480
afforded
00:27:24.980
to
00:27:25.120
thousands
00:27:25.800
of
00:27:26.200
them
00:27:26.420
it's
00:27:27.500
about
00:27:27.820
making
00:27:28.180
sure
00:27:28.460
that
00:27:28.660
when
00:27:28.840
we
00:27:29.240
say
00:27:29.760
to
00:27:30.000
members
00:27:30.400
and
00:27:30.580
Manitobans
00:27:31.540
because
00:27:31.900
this
00:27:32.560
was
00:27:32.780
the
00:27:33.360
most
00:27:33.600
important
00:27:34.160
election
00:27:34.620
that
00:27:34.980
our
00:27:35.320
party
00:27:35.660
has
00:27:36.360
ever
00:27:36.820
run
00:27:37.200
in
00:27:38.320
60
00:27:38.700
years
00:27:39.000
we've
00:27:39.240
never
00:27:39.420
seen
00:27:39.680
this
00:27:39.940
right
00:27:40.200
so
00:27:40.780
this
00:27:40.940
was
00:27:41.060
the
00:27:41.220
most
00:27:41.480
important
00:27:42.120
election
00:27:42.540
that
00:27:42.700
we
00:27:42.820
were
00:27:42.960
ever
00:27:43.260
to
00:27:43.520
run
00:27:43.820
and
00:27:44.380
it
00:27:44.460
was
00:27:44.600
such
00:27:44.940
a
00:27:45.100
failure
00:27:45.560
whether
00:27:45.900
it
00:27:46.080
be
00:27:46.180
incompetence
00:27:46.940
or
00:27:47.080
other
00:27:47.460
that
00:27:48.720
we
00:27:48.960
needed
00:27:49.420
to
00:27:49.760
make
00:27:50.380
sure
00:27:50.680
that
00:27:50.920
members
00:27:51.380
and
00:27:51.600
Manitobans
00:27:52.380
had
00:27:52.620
faith
00:27:53.100
in
00:27:53.800
the
00:27:54.040
process
00:27:54.680
and
00:27:55.320
of course
00:27:55.740
faith
00:27:56.340
in
00:27:56.720
the
00:27:56.880
result
00:27:57.320
which
00:27:58.100
we
00:27:58.260
have
00:28:00.580
which
00:28:01.200
is
00:28:01.340
why
00:28:01.640
I'm
00:28:01.880
in
00:28:02.040
court
00:28:02.280
now
00:28:02.560
and
00:28:03.120
so
00:28:03.280
democracy
00:28:03.780
is
00:28:04.140
what
00:28:04.300
I'm
00:28:04.480
defending
00:28:04.920
I
00:28:05.920
don't
00:28:06.140
care
00:28:06.380
who
00:28:06.600
is
00:28:06.780
involved
00:28:07.240
but
00:28:08.440
this
00:28:08.800
was
00:28:09.260
not
00:28:09.780
a
00:28:10.280
fair
00:28:10.680
race
00:28:11.140
it
00:28:11.820
was
00:28:11.980
not
00:28:12.200
an
00:28:12.340
accountable
00:28:12.820
race
00:28:13.420
it
00:28:14.340
did
00:28:14.540
not
00:28:14.720
follow
00:28:15.040
the
00:28:15.260
standards
00:28:15.840
that
00:28:16.260
elections
00:28:16.780
Manitoba
00:28:17.560
sets
00:28:18.660
for
00:28:19.140
all
00:28:19.440
elections
00:28:19.980
now
00:28:20.660
the
00:28:21.060
party
00:28:21.300
will
00:28:21.500
say
00:28:21.720
well
00:28:22.000
the
00:28:22.220
leadership
00:28:22.620
election
00:28:23.500
doesn't
00:28:23.940
have to
00:28:24.240
follow
00:28:24.580
those
00:28:24.880
rules
00:28:25.120
well
00:28:25.380
it
00:28:25.680
is
00:28:25.920
in
00:28:26.200
fact
00:28:26.640
the
00:28:27.840
standard
00:28:28.340
even
00:28:28.880
indicated
00:28:29.460
in
00:28:29.680
our
00:28:29.840
constitution
00:28:30.560
that
00:28:31.300
we
00:28:31.480
should
00:28:31.840
be
00:28:32.260
complying
00:28:33.260
with
00:28:33.520
so
00:28:33.720
when
00:28:33.880
the
00:28:34.000
party
00:28:34.220
says
00:28:34.500
well
00:28:34.860
there
00:28:35.380
was
00:28:35.540
no
00:28:35.780
rule
00:28:36.160
to
00:28:36.380
say
00:28:37.640
that
00:28:37.880
the
00:28:38.120
boxes
00:28:38.600
had
00:28:38.880
to
00:28:39.000
be
00:28:39.160
sealed
00:28:39.440
when
00:28:39.660
they
00:28:39.780
left
00:28:39.980
there
00:28:40.140
was
00:28:40.300
no
00:28:40.560
rule
00:28:41.060
that
00:28:41.720
said
00:28:41.920
all
00:28:42.100
members
00:28:42.520
have
00:28:42.940
to
00:28:43.080
get
00:28:43.200
a
00:28:43.320
vote
00:28:43.460
there's
00:28:43.700
no
00:28:43.900
rule
00:28:44.400
that
00:28:45.260
says
00:28:45.520
this
00:28:45.860
and
00:28:46.080
that
00:28:46.280
every
00:28:46.780
irregularity
00:28:48.160
that
00:28:48.360
we
00:28:48.480
presented
00:28:48.940
in
00:28:49.220
court
00:28:49.640
the
00:28:51.420
party
00:28:51.720
just
00:28:51.980
dismissed
00:28:52.440
with
00:28:52.680
well
00:28:53.000
you
00:28:53.920
know
00:28:54.080
we
00:28:54.640
didn't
00:28:54.820
have
00:28:55.040
rules
00:28:55.380
about
00:28:55.620
that
00:28:55.920
well
00:28:56.600
what
00:28:56.880
were
00:28:57.100
the
00:28:57.280
rules
00:28:57.620
and
00:28:57.900
in
00:28:58.060
fact
00:28:58.240
they
00:28:58.460
tried
00:28:59.160
to
00:28:59.360
dismiss
00:28:59.880
part
00:29:00.400
of
00:29:00.480
the
00:29:00.600
rules
00:29:00.820
that
00:29:00.980
went
00:29:01.160
to
00:29:01.300
my
00:29:01.480
campaign
00:29:01.860
manager
00:29:02.400
that
00:29:03.760
touched
00:29:04.460
on
00:29:04.740
how
00:29:04.960
the
00:29:05.160
count
00:29:05.420
would
00:29:05.620
be
00:29:05.940
done
00:29:07.540
and
00:29:08.000
to
00:29:08.320
hear
00:29:08.540
their
00:29:08.760
lawyer
00:29:09.160
in
00:29:09.440
court
00:29:09.940
say
00:29:11.000
oh
00:29:11.700
that
00:29:11.960
first
00:29:12.480
sheet
00:29:12.940
looks
00:29:13.240
like
00:29:13.440
it
00:29:13.520
was
00:29:13.640
just
00:29:13.820
a
00:29:14.060
letter
00:29:14.360
that
00:29:14.660
was
00:29:14.780
to
00:29:14.920
go
00:29:15.060
to
00:29:15.240
someone
00:29:15.540
obviously
00:29:16.100
it
00:29:16.320
was
00:29:16.540
not
00:29:16.920
rules
00:29:17.920
and
00:29:18.880
and
00:29:19.320
the
00:29:19.560
face
00:29:20.480
sheet
00:29:20.720
that
00:29:20.860
he
00:29:20.940
was
00:29:21.080
talking
00:29:21.500
about
00:29:21.940
had
00:29:23.100
the
00:29:23.320
form
00:29:23.720
a
00:29:24.260
that
00:29:25.140
we
00:29:25.600
use
00:29:26.780
which
00:29:27.280
has
00:29:27.700
every
00:29:28.080
member's
00:29:28.580
name
00:29:28.920
address
00:29:29.420
postal
00:29:30.360
code
00:29:30.640
on
00:29:30.860
it
00:29:31.060
and
00:29:31.640
their
00:29:31.860
code
00:29:32.360
so
00:29:32.580
that
00:29:32.700
we
00:29:32.800
can
00:29:32.980
match
00:29:33.340
them
00:29:33.560
up
00:29:33.900
to
00:29:34.320
indicate
00:29:34.640
that
00:29:34.920
they
00:29:35.160
have
00:29:35.480
in
00:29:35.660
fact
00:29:35.920
voted
00:29:36.660
so
00:29:37.140
to
00:29:37.600
try
00:29:38.040
to
00:29:38.240
dismiss
00:29:38.740
that
00:29:39.200
as
00:29:39.600
if
00:29:39.740
it's
00:29:39.920
a
00:29:40.240
letter
00:29:40.520
going
00:29:40.980
to
00:29:41.340
some
00:29:41.860
arbitrary
00:29:43.300
person
00:29:44.020
that's
00:29:46.100
inexcusable
00:29:46.940
inexcusable
00:29:47.880
that
00:29:48.080
is
00:29:48.500
blatantly
00:29:50.620
false
00:29:51.280
what
00:29:51.540
he
00:29:51.700
was
00:29:52.420
suggesting
00:29:52.960
and
00:29:54.080
shameful
00:29:55.200
actually
00:29:55.720
because
00:29:56.140
to
00:29:57.680
try to
00:29:58.020
make
00:29:58.240
out
00:29:58.500
the
00:29:59.000
rules
00:29:59.380
to
00:29:59.620
be
00:29:59.780
something
00:30:00.200
completely
00:30:01.440
out
00:30:02.420
of
00:30:02.660
line
00:30:03.220
and
00:30:03.480
not
00:30:04.120
even
00:30:04.360
related
00:30:04.860
to
00:30:05.100
the
00:30:05.260
election
00:30:05.600
was
00:30:06.220
mind
00:30:06.760
boggling
00:30:07.220
so
00:30:07.620
I do
00:30:09.600
expect
00:30:10.240
the
00:30:10.500
judge
00:30:10.720
to
00:30:11.040
make
00:30:11.400
a
00:30:11.520
decision
00:30:11.920
but
00:30:12.220
sadly
00:30:13.100
I
00:30:13.280
don't
00:30:13.480
think
00:30:13.720
it's
00:30:13.860
going
00:30:13.960
to
00:30:14.000
be
00:30:14.100
the
00:30:14.280
decision
00:30:14.740
that
00:30:15.820
many
00:30:16.140
members
00:30:16.740
are
00:30:16.960
thinking
00:30:17.280
it's
00:30:17.560
going
00:30:17.760
to
00:30:17.940
be
00:30:18.140
no
00:30:19.820
and
00:30:20.000
I
00:30:20.260
know
00:30:20.460
that
00:30:20.660
any
00:30:21.020
battle
00:30:22.540
like
00:30:22.840
this
00:30:23.080
in
00:30:23.220
the
00:30:23.340
courts
00:30:23.600
is
00:30:23.940
going
00:30:24.120
to
00:30:24.220
be
00:30:24.300
an
00:30:24.400
uphill
00:30:24.640
battle
00:30:25.000
for
00:30:25.280
two
00:30:25.660
reasons
00:30:26.040
number
00:30:26.300
one
00:30:26.580
we're
00:30:26.740
talking
00:30:27.100
about
00:30:27.480
the
00:30:28.100
premier
00:30:28.460
of
00:30:28.780
the
00:30:28.940
province
00:30:29.340
which
00:30:29.760
a
00:30:30.080
judge
00:30:30.560
is
00:30:30.720
not
00:30:30.920
going
00:30:31.140
to
00:30:31.300
want
00:30:31.440
to
00:30:31.540
single
00:30:31.760
handedly
00:30:32.200
determine
00:30:32.720
themselves
00:30:33.220
and
00:30:33.420
also
00:30:33.680
judges
00:30:34.320
generally
00:30:34.940
speaking
00:30:35.400
have
00:30:36.100
tried
00:30:36.380
to
00:30:36.540
avoid
00:30:36.840
intervening
00:30:37.400
in
00:30:37.580
political
00:30:38.000
party
00:30:38.400
affairs
00:30:38.760
so
00:30:39.020
in
00:30:39.140
a
00:30:39.380
lot
00:30:39.520
of
00:30:39.640
cases
00:30:39.900
there
00:30:40.100
may
00:30:40.300
be
00:30:40.460
more
00:30:40.700
of
00:30:40.840
a
00:30:47.760
if
00:30:48.320
you
00:30:48.460
had
00:30:48.720
the
00:30:48.860
establishment
00:30:49.400
stacked
00:30:49.900
against
00:30:50.240
you
00:30:50.440
you
00:30:50.580
had
00:30:50.880
all
00:30:51.180
of
00:30:51.320
the
00:30:51.540
MLAs
00:30:52.220
that
00:30:52.380
you
00:30:52.500
would
00:30:52.640
have
00:30:52.740
been
00:30:53.000
leading
00:30:53.460
in
00:30:53.680
caucus
00:30:54.100
endorsing
00:30:55.180
your
00:30:55.440
opponent
00:30:56.060
Heather
00:30:56.380
Stephenson
00:30:56.900
why do
00:30:57.700
you
00:30:57.780
even
00:30:57.960
want
00:30:58.220
to
00:30:58.300
be
00:30:58.420
involved
00:30:58.760
in
00:30:58.940
a
00:30:59.080
party
00:30:59.300
that
00:30:59.480
would
00:30:59.620
treat
00:30:59.860
you
00:31:00.020
the
00:31:00.160
way
00:31:00.340
you're
00:31:00.660
saying
00:31:00.980
you
00:31:01.120
were
00:31:01.260
treated
00:31:01.580
so
00:31:03.820
once
00:31:04.540
again
00:31:04.940
I
00:31:06.180
have
00:31:06.840
stood
00:31:07.680
up
00:31:07.920
against
00:31:08.340
injustice
00:31:08.820
my
00:31:09.100
entire
00:31:09.600
career
00:31:10.260
even
00:31:11.400
in
00:31:11.600
politics
00:31:12.040
I
00:31:12.680
am
00:31:13.100
seen
00:31:13.520
as
00:31:13.720
someone
00:31:14.020
who
00:31:14.600
may
00:31:15.660
be
00:31:15.820
argumentative
00:31:17.760
because I
00:31:18.140
stand up
00:31:18.620
for
00:31:18.740
what's
00:31:18.980
right
00:31:19.240
I
00:31:19.580
believe
00:31:20.240
that
00:31:20.700
I
00:31:21.060
am
00:31:21.400
someone
00:31:21.780
with
00:31:22.140
the
00:31:22.400
heart
00:31:22.660
of
00:31:22.900
a
00:31:23.060
servant
00:31:23.460
and
00:31:24.660
a
00:31:24.800
public
00:31:25.060
servant
00:31:25.500
is
00:31:26.380
where
00:31:26.860
I
00:31:27.180
have
00:31:27.480
remained
00:31:27.920
in
00:31:28.160
my
00:31:28.360
career
00:31:28.740
and
00:31:30.020
then
00:31:30.480
after
00:31:30.900
my
00:31:31.200
career
00:31:31.540
so
00:31:32.860
I
00:31:33.660
am
00:31:33.940
standing
00:31:34.240
up
00:31:34.480
for
00:31:34.740
all
00:31:35.500
of
00:31:35.680
our
00:31:35.820
members
00:31:36.240
who
00:31:37.220
believe
00:31:37.900
their
00:31:38.120
rights
00:31:38.360
were
00:31:38.540
violated
00:31:39.040
it
00:31:40.040
wasn't
00:31:40.500
about
00:31:40.820
me
00:31:41.020
I
00:31:41.180
didn't
00:31:41.360
even
00:31:41.620
go
00:31:42.220
into
00:31:42.480
this
00:31:42.720
as
00:31:42.880
I
00:31:43.020
said
00:31:43.300
originally
00:31:43.880
Andrew
00:31:44.220
I
00:31:44.400
didn't
00:31:44.620
go
00:31:44.820
into
00:31:45.100
this
00:31:45.500
thinking
00:31:46.400
I
00:31:47.760
the
00:31:47.920
last
00:31:48.260
woman
00:31:48.560
standing
00:31:49.100
in
00:31:50.160
a
00:31:50.320
one-on-one
00:31:50.780
race
00:31:51.180
with
00:31:51.560
Heather
00:31:51.840
I
00:31:52.900
honestly
00:31:53.400
believed
00:31:54.040
that
00:31:55.140
the
00:31:55.920
other
00:31:56.100
people
00:31:56.380
that
00:31:56.560
had
00:31:56.740
said
00:31:56.980
they
00:31:57.140
were
00:31:57.240
going
00:31:57.480
to
00:31:57.680
run
00:31:57.960
would
00:31:59.240
outpace
00:32:01.020
me
00:32:01.340
and
00:32:01.900
be
00:32:02.220
the
00:32:03.140
last
00:32:03.440
one
00:32:03.680
standing
00:32:04.160
I
00:32:05.180
had
00:32:05.720
no
00:32:05.940
intention
00:32:06.440
in the
00:32:07.100
beginning
00:32:07.420
of
00:32:07.720
doing
00:32:07.940
anything
00:32:08.300
but
00:32:08.640
fighting
00:32:10.000
that
00:32:11.280
coronation
00:32:11.880
and
00:32:13.300
making
00:32:13.680
sure
00:32:13.980
that
00:32:14.140
there
00:32:14.280
was
00:32:14.440
a
00:32:14.560
race
00:32:14.860
but
00:32:15.500
after
00:32:15.780
the
00:32:15.980
rules
00:32:16.460
everyone
00:32:17.540
else
00:32:17.780
dropped
00:32:18.060
out
00:32:18.480
and
00:32:19.700
it
00:32:20.260
just
00:32:20.520
motivated
00:32:21.080
me
00:32:21.340
more
00:32:21.600
and
00:32:21.740
empowered
00:32:22.140
me
00:32:22.360
to
00:32:22.520
say
00:32:22.680
this
00:32:23.000
is
00:32:23.300
wrong
00:32:23.700
this
00:32:24.160
is
00:32:24.380
so
00:32:24.760
wrong
00:32:25.180
this
00:32:25.660
is
00:32:25.820
not
00:32:26.160
our
00:32:26.400
party
00:32:26.740
these
00:32:27.160
are
00:32:27.280
not
00:32:27.520
the
00:32:27.700
values
00:32:28.080
that
00:32:28.260
our
00:32:28.400
party
00:32:28.680
has
00:32:29.180
and
00:32:29.840
we
00:32:30.000
need
00:32:30.260
a
00:32:30.400
race
00:32:30.620
so
00:32:30.780
that
00:32:30.880
our
00:32:31.020
party
00:32:31.280
can
00:32:31.560
be
00:32:31.760
lifted
00:32:32.120
out
00:32:32.360
of
00:32:32.500
the
00:32:32.660
doldrums
00:32:33.380
we
00:32:33.500
were
00:32:33.640
in
00:32:34.000
given
00:32:34.800
the
00:32:35.200
history
00:32:35.760
that
00:32:36.000
we
00:32:36.200
just
00:32:36.720
finished
00:32:38.360
having
00:32:39.760
so
00:32:40.060
all
00:32:41.640
I
00:32:41.800
can
00:32:41.940
say
00:32:42.200
is
00:32:42.480
I
00:32:43.240
love
00:32:43.720
this
00:32:43.980
party
00:32:44.400
I
00:32:47.540
their
00:32:47.920
policies
00:32:48.660
I
00:32:50.340
love
00:32:50.640
that
00:32:50.800
we
00:32:50.960
fight
00:32:51.480
for
00:32:52.000
members
00:32:52.920
rights
00:32:53.320
and
00:32:53.820
those
00:32:54.640
were
00:32:54.800
all
00:32:55.080
being
00:32:55.500
trashed
00:32:56.700
and
00:32:57.020
discarded
00:32:57.960
so
00:32:58.480
that
00:32:58.680
we
00:32:59.100
would
00:32:59.460
not
00:32:59.660
have
00:32:59.860
a
00:32:59.980
race
00:33:00.240
and
00:33:00.380
would
00:33:00.500
not
00:33:00.680
have
00:33:00.880
an
00:33:01.000
election
00:33:01.340
so
00:33:01.660
it's
00:33:02.500
not
00:33:02.700
about
00:33:02.960
for
00:33:03.780
me
00:33:03.900
it's
00:33:04.040
not
00:33:04.160
about
00:33:04.380
how
00:33:04.640
the
00:33:04.780
party
00:33:05.040
treated
00:33:05.400
me
00:33:05.640
or
00:33:05.920
how
00:33:06.440
this
00:33:06.720
one
00:33:06.980
campaign
00:33:07.440
treated
00:33:07.760
me
00:33:08.120
I'm
00:33:09.520
standing
00:33:09.780
up
00:33:09.980
for
00:33:10.140
those
00:33:10.500
thousands
00:33:11.000
and
00:33:11.320
thousands
00:33:11.640
of
00:33:11.920
conservatives
00:33:12.360
who
00:33:12.900
believe
00:33:13.560
in
00:33:14.080
conservative
00:33:15.000
policies
00:33:15.560
and
00:33:15.820
values
00:33:16.300
and
00:33:17.020
I'll
00:33:17.180
always
00:33:17.420
stand
00:33:17.660
up
00:33:17.800
for
00:33:17.920
them
00:33:18.160
if
00:33:19.080
the
00:33:19.340
decision
00:33:19.920
doesn't
00:33:20.420
go
00:33:20.640
your
00:33:20.960
way
00:33:21.380
is
00:33:21.580
this
00:33:21.740
still
00:33:21.960
a
00:33:22.220
party
00:33:22.500
you'll
00:33:22.720
support
00:33:23.040
in
00:33:23.200
the
00:33:23.280
next
00:33:23.480
election
00:33:23.920
well
00:33:25.540
we'll
00:33:25.740
have
00:33:25.920
to
00:33:26.080
see
00:33:26.480
if
00:33:27.640
the
00:33:27.960
party
00:33:28.300
has
00:33:28.900
repaired
00:33:29.500
many
00:33:30.100
of
00:33:30.260
the
00:33:30.380
things
00:33:30.780
that
00:33:31.320
were
00:33:31.660
wrong
00:33:32.020
and
00:33:32.200
I'll
00:33:32.320
give
00:33:32.480
you
00:33:32.540
an
00:33:32.640
example
00:33:33.080
I
00:33:33.480
started
00:33:34.680
out
00:33:35.000
in
00:33:35.260
this
00:33:36.140
when
00:33:36.540
the
00:33:37.140
rules
00:33:37.380
came
00:33:37.640
out
00:33:37.900
and
00:33:38.220
it
00:33:38.420
took
00:33:38.700
four
00:33:39.220
days
00:33:39.700
to
00:33:40.560
get
00:33:40.920
the
00:33:41.400
package
00:33:42.040
the
00:33:43.080
application
00:33:43.600
package
00:33:44.080
that
00:33:44.440
the
00:33:44.760
party
00:33:45.000
said
00:33:45.320
was
00:33:45.520
available
00:33:45.980
they
00:33:46.820
said
00:33:47.020
they
00:33:47.140
were
00:33:47.260
still
00:33:47.460
working
00:33:47.740
on
00:33:47.940
it
00:33:48.040
so
00:33:48.280
and
00:33:48.780
the
00:33:48.880
application
00:33:49.200
package
00:33:50.780
had
00:33:51.060
many
00:33:51.540
many
00:33:51.780
errors
00:33:52.160
in
00:33:52.320
it
00:33:52.420
for
00:33:52.580
example
00:33:52.880
you
00:33:53.080
had
00:33:53.200
to
00:33:53.360
sign
00:33:53.580
a
00:33:53.740
form
00:33:54.000
that
00:33:54.200
said
00:33:54.480
I
00:33:55.600
will
00:33:56.100
or
00:33:57.020
I
00:33:57.280
agree
00:33:57.560
to
00:33:57.760
all
00:33:57.940
the
00:33:58.120
policies
00:33:58.600
of
00:33:58.940
the
00:33:59.140
PC
00:34:00.080
party
00:34:00.740
of
00:34:00.900
Manitoba
00:34:01.460
and
00:34:02.440
so
00:34:02.620
when
00:34:02.760
I
00:34:02.920
phoned
00:34:03.240
to
00:34:03.420
say
00:34:03.560
well
00:34:03.700
where's
00:34:04.220
the
00:34:04.340
book
00:34:04.540
of
00:34:04.700
policies
00:34:05.160
that
00:34:05.460
we
00:34:05.600
used
00:34:05.840
to
00:34:06.000
have
00:34:06.260
because
00:34:06.440
I
00:34:06.580
sat
00:34:06.800
on
00:34:06.920
the
00:34:07.040
communications
00:34:07.560
team
00:34:08.000
some
00:34:08.280
25
00:34:08.720
years
00:34:09.080
ago
00:34:09.360
and
00:34:10.740
got
00:34:10.960
they
00:34:11.300
got
00:34:11.460
back
00:34:11.700
to
00:34:11.820
me
00:34:11.980
saying
00:34:12.280
oh
00:34:12.700
we
00:34:12.860
don't
00:34:13.020
have
00:34:13.260
any
00:34:13.420
policy
00:34:13.820
book
00:34:14.120
so
00:34:14.540
just
00:34:15.020
cross
00:34:15.420
that
00:34:15.640
out
00:34:15.960
and
00:34:16.400
put
00:34:16.860
I've
00:34:17.280
read
00:34:17.420
all
00:34:17.580
the
00:34:17.720
rules
00:34:18.100
of
00:34:18.500
the
00:34:18.800
leadership
00:34:19.580
I
00:34:19.780
mean
00:34:19.900
it
00:34:20.100
was
00:34:20.280
so
00:34:21.760
poorly
00:34:22.400
run
00:34:22.840
from
00:34:23.260
day
00:34:23.580
one
00:34:23.780
it
00:34:23.880
was
00:34:24.020
obvious
00:34:24.640
they
00:34:25.120
had
00:34:25.260
no
00:34:25.540
intention
00:34:25.960
of
00:34:26.180
holding
00:34:26.400
a
00:34:26.560
race
00:34:26.840
they
00:34:27.360
were
00:34:27.520
just
00:34:27.720
going
00:34:27.940
to
00:34:28.100
coronate
00:34:28.480
someone
00:34:28.800
and
00:34:29.260
so
00:34:29.920
they've
00:34:30.140
got
00:34:30.240
to
00:34:30.340
repair
00:34:30.580
a
00:34:30.780
lot
00:34:30.940
of
00:34:31.080
things
00:34:31.420
in
00:34:32.280
order
00:34:32.440
for
00:34:32.620
me
00:34:32.740
to
00:34:32.900
stand
00:34:33.180
up
00:34:33.360
and
00:34:33.520
say
00:34:33.700
you
00:34:33.920
are
00:34:34.180
conservative
00:34:35.000
you
00:34:36.360
are
00:34:36.620
following
00:34:37.580
conservative
00:34:38.160
values
00:34:38.840
and
00:34:39.200
following
00:34:39.740
policies
00:34:41.020
that
00:34:41.360
I
00:34:41.540
actually
00:34:42.000
agree
00:34:42.740
with
00:34:43.000
without
00:34:43.220
a
00:34:43.420
policy
00:34:43.800
book
00:34:44.040
it's
00:34:44.240
hard
00:34:44.380
to
00:34:44.540
tell
00:34:44.760
whether
00:34:45.000
they're
00:34:45.240
a
00:34:45.380
conservative
00:34:45.840
a
00:34:46.140
liberal
00:34:46.380
or
00:34:46.600
an
00:34:46.720
NDP
00:34:47.040
and
00:34:48.180
that's
00:34:48.420
not
00:34:48.600
acceptable
00:34:49.040
it's
00:34:49.500
unacceptable
00:34:50.080
for a
00:34:50.740
party
00:34:50.960
not
00:34:51.180
to
00:34:51.320
have
00:34:51.500
a
00:34:51.620
policy
00:34:51.960
book
00:34:52.300
Shelley
00:34:53.820
Glover
00:34:54.140
thank
00:34:54.400
you
00:34:54.500
very
00:34:54.680
much
00:34:55.000
you're
00:34:55.760
very
00:34:56.020
welcome
00:34:56.380
and
00:34:56.860
you
00:34:56.980
have
00:34:57.120
a
00:34:57.240
Merry
00:34:57.400
Christmas
00:34:57.800
Andrew
00:34:58.180
That
00:35:01.820
was
00:35:02.020
former
00:35:02.500
Manitoba
00:35:03.160
PC
00:35:03.480
leadership
00:35:03.900
candidate
00:35:04.420
Shelley
00:35:04.740
Glover
00:35:05.100
as she
00:35:05.400
said
00:35:05.640
at the
00:35:05.960
beginning
00:35:06.160
of the
00:35:06.400
interview
00:35:06.680
she
00:35:06.900
believes
00:35:07.240
she
00:35:07.460
is
00:35:07.720
the
00:35:07.860
premier
00:35:08.140
of
00:35:10.240
Alberta
00:35:10.520
that
00:35:10.760
honor
00:35:11.020
is
00:35:11.240
officially
00:35:11.680
bestowed
00:35:12.200
on
00:35:12.520
Heather
00:35:12.760
Stephenson
00:35:13.240
though
00:35:13.660
obviously
00:35:14.020
we'll
00:35:14.220
see
00:35:14.440
what
00:35:15.040
the
00:35:15.180
judge
00:35:15.400
has
00:35:15.640
to
00:35:15.780
say
00:35:15.920
this
00:35:16.120
week
00:35:16.320
and
00:35:16.460
I'm
00:35:16.720
glad
00:35:16.940
Shelley
00:35:17.220
has
00:35:17.540
realistic
00:35:18.120
expectations
00:35:18.760
of
00:35:18.980
this
00:35:19.140
courts
00:35:19.440
do
00:35:20.020
not
00:35:20.320
they
00:35:20.500
want
00:35:20.740
to
00:35:20.840
just
00:35:21.060
avoid
00:35:21.540
political
00:35:22.020
parties
00:35:22.540
as
00:35:22.880
much
00:35:23.240
as
00:35:23.400
they
00:35:23.580
can
00:35:24.000
because
00:35:24.560
no
00:35:25.160
I
00:35:25.340
whatever
00:35:26.440
esteem
00:35:27.060
you
00:35:27.240
hold
00:35:27.520
judges
00:35:27.920
in
00:35:28.140
and
00:35:28.260
in
00:35:28.420
a lot
00:35:28.700
of
00:35:28.820
cases
00:35:29.120
it's
00:35:29.380
very
00:35:29.600
low
00:35:29.880
for
00:35:30.080
me
00:35:30.260
but
00:35:30.840
they
00:35:31.060
don't
00:35:31.360
want
00:35:31.600
to
00:35:31.740
be
00:35:31.920
seen
00:35:32.560
as
00:35:33.700
trying
00:35:33.960
to
00:35:34.120
just
00:35:34.300
play
00:35:34.560
kingmaker
00:35:35.200
when
00:35:35.880
it
00:35:36.000
comes
00:35:36.240
to
00:35:36.380
the
00:35:36.500
political
00:35:36.760
process
00:35:37.280
especially
00:35:37.960
internally
00:35:38.580
in
00:35:38.820
political
00:35:39.100
parties
00:35:39.480
so
00:35:39.680
that's
00:35:40.320
the
00:35:40.440
challenge
00:35:40.720
but
00:35:40.880
obviously
00:35:41.180
we'll
00:35:41.380
keep
00:35:41.520
an
00:35:41.640
eye
00:35:41.760
out
00:35:41.900
for
00:35:42.020
that
00:35:42.240
in
00:35:42.620
the
00:35:42.700
meantime
00:35:42.920
we've
00:35:43.240
got
00:35:43.420
to
00:35:43.620
end
00:35:43.900
things
00:35:44.200
there
00:35:44.500
my
00:35:44.680
thanks
00:35:44.940
to
00:35:45.080
all
00:35:45.280
of
00:35:45.420
you
00:35:45.560
for
00:35:45.820
tuning
00:35:46.080
into
00:35:46.300
the
00:35:46.440
show
00:35:46.580
today
00:35:46.800
we'll
00:35:46.960
talk
00:35:47.160
to
00:35:47.240
you
00:35:47.340
soon
00:35:47.580
with
00:35:48.020
more
00:35:48.260
of
00:35:48.520
Canada's
00:35:49.020
most
00:35:49.440
irreverent
00:35:49.920
talk
00:35:50.160
show
00:35:50.360
here
00:35:50.600
on
00:35:50.780
True
00:35:50.940
North
00:35:51.180
thank
00:35:51.720
you
00:35:51.880
God
00:35:52.140
bless
00:35:52.460
and
00:35:52.620
good
00:35:52.780
day
00:35:53.020
thanks
00:35:54.100
for
00:35:54.240
listening
00:35:54.540
to
00:35:54.720
the
00:35:54.860
Andrew
00:35:55.140
Lawton
00:35:55.440
show
00:35:55.740
support
00:35:56.320
the
00:35:56.480
program
00:35:56.800
by
00:35:57.000
donating
00:35:57.360
to
00:35:57.580
True
00:35:57.760
North
00:35:58.020
at
00:35:58.280
www.tnc.news
Link copied!