00:03:36.200I've spoken to a few scrutineers already who said they've never seen anything like it.
00:03:39.040and it's unreal what happened in there so i i i i need i need to i need to i need to do a full
00:03:45.840i need to do a full debrief with the team uh i mean i wasn't in the room i was shaking hands and
00:03:52.040they said they've never seen anything like it there were at one table it was 50 of the people
00:03:59.940that had id issues uh saying they'd lost driver's license they just moved in the area so look i
00:04:04.840I don't know. It's unfair for me to specifically speculate. I got no idea.
00:04:08.880I would like to hear from every single person that was in that room on our team to understand what took place and what their feeling is and if there is a legitimate reason to challenge.
00:04:19.700Obviously, given everything we've seen in the race to date and some frustrations along the way with disallowing members and then we see scrutineers in that room articulate concerns.
00:04:31.220i i honestly i have to do a full full debrief with them before i decide next steps before i decide if
00:04:37.220if i really consider the outcome fair there you go suspicious goings on he's never seen anything
00:04:42.500like it steven half the people had id issues some just moved to the area what do you make of this
00:04:48.580well there's two uh two focal points on it it's what the the losing canada say canada said mark
00:04:55.780and he said that he has strong suspicions of voting irregularities fine he's losing candidates
00:05:05.460i think it looks like sour grapes if he has evidence he should shut up until he has that
00:05:11.140evidence and then bring it forward but not just throw ask you know ideas out there and say oh i
00:05:17.380i've been told by my people that there were irregularities i was also told that his chief
00:05:22.180scrutineer the person who was there to make sure there were no irregularities had signed off on
00:05:27.220the process so there's a number of uh issues to be uh resolved however in the meantime uh that
00:05:36.340candidate does not he's not putting his best foot forward because it just sounds like he's uh you
00:05:40.740know he lost no one likes to lose uh but unless you have some evidence you just shut up and take
00:05:45.620the verdict the other aspect i want to bring up to you though mark is this is the provincial
00:05:52.020liberal party that lost the last election that uh you and i and others know that the officers of the
00:06:02.100party leadership of the party they couldn't organize a christmas parade in december i mean
00:06:09.460they really are not built for prime time one writing one writing we dealt with this weekend
00:06:17.460and they knew that someone running for the nomination wanted to run for leader you'd think
00:06:22.500that they would have really smart people in there and really good processes to make sure
00:06:28.500that there were no allegations of voters irregularity or that you know all kinds of
00:06:33.060people were not were voting who shouldn't have been voting no no see this is not run by the
00:06:37.700candidates this is run by the liberal party of ontario and the liberal party of ontario
00:06:42.740I'm pulled by many, many people, as I said, couldn't organize a Christmas parade in December.
00:06:49.940It just is incompetent. And that shows. My understanding, you would know better than
00:06:56.340I, is that Erskine Smith is not well-liked in the Liberal Party. Some are suggesting that
00:07:01.880they manipulated things, that the party itself did not want Erskine Smith in there. Others say
00:07:07.800that the opposite is true in terms of being competitive with Ford
00:07:12.360and that maybe Doug Ford, the premier, currently is the real winner here
00:07:16.500as a result of what took place because they saw Erskine Smith
00:10:42.480And recently, when there's been some cuck-ups about party nominations, some well-intentioned but poorly thought-out people will say, oh, we need to have the government make rules for party nominations.
00:12:00.300and so now you have what appears to be
00:12:03.820a liberal who is the victim of some of that
00:12:07.920immigration policy that the liberals have pushed just bring in you know millions of people into
00:12:13.900the country uh give them every chance to stay you know is this a situation where they're kind of the
00:12:23.120victim of their own policies around immigration and quote-unquote diversity well i would i
00:12:29.440certainly agree with you but i would put it differently mark i say they're victims of their0.99
00:12:34.280own stupidity uh because people across the country i've been scratching their heads for years about0.99
00:12:40.680what trudeau and mark miller who's minister of immigration who is still in carney's cabinet uh1.00
00:12:47.320is an incompetent uh why they were doing that where they thought they got the mandate from
00:12:52.280whether it's a post-industrial state where they're trying to destroy the canadian uh society i don't
00:12:57.240know what their intention was but i know what the result was which is that they certainly have
00:13:01.400weakened canadian society yes diversity you we you know 30 years ago you came to this country
00:13:09.480and you want to become a canadian so everybody was going to be part of society and most people
00:13:15.560did that and we built a stronger society because of it now under the last 12 years of liberal
00:13:21.720government uh come to this country and be like you were in the other country wherever you came from
00:13:29.240And so start your tribal wars, fight it out here.0.97
00:13:32.380We can burn churches down, you can burn synagogues down.0.99
00:13:35.540Just come on in here and just destroy us.
00:13:38.260So maybe this candidate, this federal candidate who was supporting those policies
00:13:42.400in the federal government for the last few years has got his come up.
00:13:47.240Oh, maybe we weren't that smart after all,
00:13:50.520because most people in the country think or know that they weren't that smart.
00:13:54.240And now maybe we have the evidence of that, Mark.
00:13:56.340Is there a possibility, Stephen, that there will be a civil war, a rupture, in the words of Mark Carney, at the heart of the Liberal Party between the old guard that expected Erskine Smith to win and those who are all in on making new Canadians and even non-Canadians representatives of their parties?
00:14:18.700Well, I don't think that'd be a wise course for anybody to pursue. I think that the fact of the matter is that Erskine Smith did not feel comfortable in the federal Liberal Party, or he did not see an opportunity to reward his ambition.
00:14:38.620So he clearly was jumping to the provincial party.
00:14:42.240And he must think that Ford is vulnerable.
00:16:04.960I have signed affidavits from 50 people that they saw or that they were underage and that they voted.
00:16:14.060If he comes up with solid, uncomfortable evidence that this writing meeting was jeopardized, was run dishonestly, was run incompetently, then there's another day for him to fight.
00:16:28.940Because he can go on and say privately to the party, you better do something about this.
00:16:33.560or two uh he can go public it's not gonna look good if it goes public but three if he does make
00:16:41.820right i mean why does the liberal party tolerate this
00:16:50.320why does the liberal party tolerate this i mean we've seen instances where foreign students are
00:16:57.820voting i mean i did do they not understand that this is undermining the credibility of the party
00:17:07.260clearly not until you pointed it out mark they didn't do anything about it
00:17:13.900but that's why i said i mean the the machinery at the provincial level is uh before the last
00:17:20.460election i would hear stories from people and uh they say that you know these people
00:17:25.980in the mission the liberal party office just don't know what they're doing i think we saw the
00:17:30.060evidence of this weekend so you know as to the to the future of irsman smith he i think he has to
00:17:38.300have to come up with some evidence or just uh you know stuff it in his pocket and walk away
00:17:44.620and say i'll fight another day but i'm not going to be leader why would you want to be leader of
00:17:49.420of that party. All right. Stephen LaDrew, host of the three-minute interview. Thank you so much for
00:17:57.260coming on the show. Appreciate it. Thank you for inviting me. It's always a pleasure to chat with
00:18:01.440you, Mark. See you later. If you enjoyed this show, consider supporting great independent
00:18:06.340journalism by becoming a premier member of Juno News. Please go to junonews.com backslash straight
00:18:12.560up. You can find a link below. It helps us do what we do here. Thank you so much. We'll see you next