Juno News - November 19, 2025


Carney calls Toronto “genius” for immigrant majority


Episode Stats

Length

14 minutes

Words per Minute

173.26593

Word Count

2,468

Sentence Count

120

Hate Speech Sentences

4


Summary

Isaac Lamoureux and Alex Zoltan discuss Prime Minister Mark Carney's comments praising Toronto's growing immigrant population, and what they suggest about his vision for Canada's immigration policy. They discuss the tension between what Carney says and what he does, and the reality on the ground.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Prime Minister Mark Carney applauded Toronto's immigrant population now surpassing its native-born
00:00:10.040 population, saying it's a model for the rest of Canada. Alberta is lifting some of the restrictions
00:00:15.040 on Canada's quote, universal healthcare system by introducing a hybrid model, allowing the private
00:00:20.680 sector to alleviate some of the backlog faced in the province. Two NDP MPs were the difference
00:00:26.020 between Canada being thrown into a Christmas election as they abstain from voting on Carney's
00:00:30.540 2025 federal budget. Hello Canada, it's Wednesday, November 19th, and this is the True North Daily
00:00:35.820 Brief. I'm Isaac Lamoureux. I'm Alex Zoltam. We've got you covered with all the news you need to know.
00:00:41.500 Let's discuss the top stories of the day and the True North exclusives you won't hear anywhere else.
00:00:48.920 Prime Minister Mark Carney is applauding Toronto's growing immigrant population,
00:00:52.800 calling the city a model for Canada's future. In an interview published Thursday by Toronto Life,
00:00:58.260 Carney highlighted that more than half of the Greater Toronto Area's residents were born outside of
00:01:02.860 Canada. Virtually half of the people in the Greater GTA were born outside this country. You wouldn't
00:01:10.460 know. You wouldn't know because they quickly become Canadian, were enriched by them. And that's true of
00:01:16.500 our country as a whole. It's always been true of our country. And of course, you know, Toronto is centre
00:01:20.880 of finance, of culture, of business, huge entrepreneurship here. So there's so many
00:01:28.860 things that make Toronto unique, relatively unique, the sum of them all being together in one place,
00:01:36.880 I guess. But the nature of it and the genius of Toronto is the genius of Canada.
00:01:42.360 According to the 2021 census, 46.6% of Toronto's population was foreign born. Government labour
00:01:50.980 data from the same year showed immigrants accounted for 49% of the city's employed residents.
00:01:56.660 Carney framed the demographic shift as a strength, arguing that immigration continues to benefit
00:02:01.240 Canada socially and economically. The comments come as the federal government maintains high
00:02:06.000 immigration targets, a policy that has sparked debate amid rising concerns over housing affordability
00:02:10.840 and infrastructure pressure in major cities. Carney was slammed by Conservative leader Pierre
00:02:15.360 Pallievre during the lead-up to April's federal election for appointing Mark Wiseman, a mass immigration
00:02:20.680 advocate and co-founder of the Century Initiative, to his Canada-US Relations Council. So Alex,
00:02:26.400 what do these comments tell us about Carney's vision for Canada and how does it compare against
00:02:30.540 former Liberal Prime Minister Justin Trudeau?
00:02:32.820 Oh wow, there's a lot to unpack here. First of all, I just think that right off the top,
00:02:38.800 it's necessary to point out how illogical it is to say that Toronto represents the best of Canada
00:02:44.240 because half of the city is not Canadian. There's something kind of absurd about that on its face.
00:02:50.160 And in regards to your question, I think it speaks to the fact that Carney's vision for Canada is very
00:02:55.200 much the same post-national, I would say exuberantly pro-immigration policy as we had with Justin Trudeau.
00:03:02.320 What makes Carney's position, though, a little bit, I would say, more difficult to stomach is the fact that it's so far removed from his actual policies.
00:03:11.120 The rhetoric and the policies just simply don't match up. And we see this a lot with Mark Carney.
00:03:15.320 For instance, you know, Carney publicly launched Toronto's immigrant majority as a Canadian success story,
00:03:20.080 but he is also saying that he wants to cap temporary residents at 5%, down from 7.3% under Justin Trudeau.
00:03:27.940 This suggests to me, anyway, that Mark Carney is trying to thread a very narrow political needle on this issue.
00:03:35.620 Specifically, he's appealing to immigrant communities, which he needs as a voting bloc,
00:03:39.960 while at the same time reassuring the broader public that he's going to reduce immigration,
00:03:43.880 because as we can all tell, the infrastructure is just simply not keeping up with the level of demand
00:03:50.060 due to all of the immigration and immigrants coming into the country.
00:03:53.780 The tension between what he says and what he does becomes, in my opinion, even more sharp
00:03:58.980 when you look at it through the growing extortion crisis that's affecting many parts of Canada,
00:04:03.540 particularly in BC and also in parts of Ontario, including the greater Toronto area.
00:04:08.240 Carney is saying that you can hardly tell that more than 50% of Toronto, or close to 50% anyway,
00:04:13.660 is an immigrant community, but you certainly can tell when you're dealing with an extortion crisis
00:04:18.200 that is affecting almost exclusively people in the immigrant diaspora,
00:04:22.860 specifically the South Asian diaspora.
00:04:24.840 And I don't want to racialize the issue, but that's simply the reality on the ground.
00:04:28.760 So in short, I would say Carney may be using this pro-immigration rhetoric to shore up support
00:04:32.740 with that voting bloc that he needs, but his policy record and his muted response
00:04:36.980 on safeguarding those communities from the actual threats that they're facing
00:04:40.320 belied the fact that he continues to think that immigration is this incredible success story.
00:04:45.980 I find the comments both disingenuous and not in keeping with his own policy proposals.
00:04:53.920 Alberta is poised to revolutionize healthcare with a new model that would allow doctors to work
00:04:58.080 in both the public and private systems concurrently, according to a leaked draft legislation.
00:05:02.920 This groundbreaking shift, a first in Canada, directly addresses the crisis of long wait times
00:05:07.640 and poor access by finally opening the door to private sector solutions.
00:05:11.380 The Globe and Mail first reported that draft amendments dated November 5th would create three
00:05:15.440 categories of physicians, including a new class of, quote, flexibly participating doctors
00:05:20.480 allowed to bill privately while working in the publicly funded system.
00:05:24.120 The draft also outlines new disclosure requirements for private billing
00:05:27.240 and establishes government authority to restrict which services may be offered outside the public stream.
00:05:32.380 The, quote, flexibly participating physician would reportedly not be required
00:05:36.060 to notify the government which specific service they intend to offer publicly versus privately.
00:05:40.240 The Globe and Mail also reported that the draft creates distinct streams of fully public physicians,
00:05:45.540 fully private physicians, and a new category of doctors who may choose on a case-by-case basis
00:05:50.040 whether to bill the public system or charge patients privately.
00:05:53.200 The potential legislation would also require doctors providing privately billed care
00:05:56.880 to give patients written disclosure of costs, confirm the service may be available
00:06:01.100 at no charge in the public system, and to obtain written consent before proceeding.
00:06:05.360 The documents come as pressure for systemic reform in the healthcare industry grows nationwide.
00:06:10.260 Recent polling and research from Canadian think tanks show rising interest in private healthcare
00:06:14.600 options, especially amongst younger Canadians.
00:06:17.340 So, Isaac, other countries with universal healthcare systems, which often rank higher than Canada
00:06:21.600 in various comparisons, do integrate the private sector into their system.
00:06:25.880 What are some of these countries?
00:06:27.460 What are they doing differently from Canada?
00:06:29.380 And how does it work or not work?
00:06:31.000 Yeah, Alex.
00:06:32.080 So, countries that outrank Canada when it comes to healthcare but still have universal coverage
00:06:37.380 tend to do two things differently.
00:06:39.940 First, they separate who pays from who provides, and they give patients real choice backed by competition.
00:06:45.560 Let's start with Switzerland, which is a recent example that think tanks have been exploring.
00:06:50.140 There, everyone has to buy basic health insurance, but it's delivered through dozens of tightly regulated
00:06:55.380 private insurers rather than a single government payer.
00:06:58.320 Those insurers all have to cover the same generous basket of medically necessary services, but they
00:07:03.700 compete on service, networks, and efficiency.
00:07:06.520 On the delivery side, most Swiss hospitals are actually private, either for-profit or not-for-profit,
00:07:12.240 but they're funded on equal footing with public facilities through an activity-based model.
00:07:16.660 In practice, money follows the patient, not the bureaucracy.
00:07:20.020 If a private hospital can treat you faster and at the same price, it gets the contract.
00:07:24.140 That mix has led to more doctors per capita, more hospital beds, and far shorter wait times
00:07:29.460 than Canadians see, even though Switzerland spends almost the exact same share of GDP on
00:07:34.280 healthcare as we do.
00:07:35.720 You see similar patterns in places like the Netherlands, France, the UK, and Sweden, all
00:07:40.660 ranking ahead of Canada.
00:07:41.880 They keep a tax-funded or social insurance guarantee, that meaning no one is turned away
00:07:46.600 for lack of money, but they don't try to run everything through a single government monopoly.
00:07:51.220 In the UK and Sweden, for example, a relatively small share of people carry private insurance
00:07:56.280 or pay out-of-pocket to use independent hospitals and clinics alongside the public system.
00:08:01.640 Those parallel options are still working under national rules, but they add capacity and
00:08:05.880 give patients an escape hatch when public queues get too long.
00:08:09.600 That extra pressure forces the public side to up its game instead of taking patients for
00:08:13.980 granted.
00:08:16.140 Continental systems like the Dutch or French models take it a step further.
00:08:19.480 They rely almost entirely on independent providers paid by multiple insurers, and governments
00:08:24.360 set the rules, subsidize premiums, and protect low-income patients, but day-to-day care is
00:08:29.060 delivered in a more competitive environment.
00:08:31.300 If you're unhappy with delays or service, you can change insurer or provider, something
00:08:35.240 Canadians simply can't do within our single-payer model.
00:08:39.040 By contrast, Canada largely bans people from using private insurance for core medically necessary
00:08:44.140 services, and provinces fund hospitals through big budgets rather than paying for treatment.
00:08:50.000 That tends to cap capacity and ration care through wait times instead of price.
00:08:54.120 It also means fresh investment and innovation from the private sector has a hard time getting
00:08:58.200 into the system at all, even when Canadians are clearly willing to explore alternatives.
00:09:02.560 So the key difference isn't that other universal systems are more American, it's that they treat
00:09:07.780 universal coverage as a goal, everybody gets care, but use private insurers and private hospitals
00:09:13.900 and patient choice as tools to reach that goal.
00:09:16.340 Canada has clung to a rigid single-payer monopoly, and the result is what we're seeing now.
00:09:21.380 Some of the highest spending in the developed world, some of the longest waits, and growing
00:09:25.200 pressure to copy the mixed public-private models that have been working better almost everywhere
00:09:29.620 else.
00:09:33.880 Mark Carney's Liberals managed to push through their 2025 budget in the House of Commons late
00:09:38.380 on Monday thanks to some MPs who abstained from the final 170-168 vote.
00:09:43.560 For example, two NDP MPs abstained from voting, however, even if they voted no, it would not
00:09:48.120 have likely resulted in a different outcome, as a tie would have been subject to a tiebreaker
00:09:52.260 from the Liberal Speaker of the House.
00:09:54.220 Two Conservatives also abstained, while the rest voted against.
00:09:58.160 Conservative MP Matt Genereau, who had previously announced his impending resignation next spring,
00:10:02.420 was not present, nor did he cast a vote.
00:10:04.840 Conservative MP Shannon Stubbs did not vote, who was on approved medical leave after surgery.
00:10:10.340 So in final, the Liberal budget passed, surviving the final hurdle after two earlier confidence
00:10:15.080 motions on the budget bill.
00:10:16.420 Prime Minister Mark Carney said in a post to X, quote, tonight, the House of Commons has
00:10:20.680 voted to pass Budget 2025.
00:10:22.940 It's time to work together to deliver on this plan, to protect our communities, empower
00:10:27.160 Canadians with new opportunities, and build Canada strong.
00:10:30.620 While two NDP MPs, Gord Johns and Laurie Idlut, abstained, the other five did vote against the
00:10:35.900 budget.
00:10:36.900 NDP interim leader Don Davies told reporters after the vote, quote, we have decided to put
00:10:41.860 the interests of our country first, to vote against the budget, but to help prevent an
00:10:46.520 election.
00:10:47.520 All Bloc Québécois MPs voted nay.
00:10:50.200 However, Green Party leader Elizabeth May voted in favour, following her pledge earlier
00:10:55.440 in the day to support the Carney government's budget to prevent an election, citing climate
00:10:59.420 promises.
00:11:00.600 So Alex, we've been talking about this budget for a while now, but aside from the $78.3 billion
00:11:05.960 deficit, what are some of the key criticisms against it?
00:11:08.860 Well, Isaac, there are very few things that are guaranteed in life, and one of them is
00:11:13.160 not being able to please everyone.
00:11:15.520 But what makes this budget sort of exceptional is the fact that it has managed to displease
00:11:20.260 virtually everyone.
00:11:22.580 It has been criticized across the board by every opposition party, by most of Canada's
00:11:28.020 major stakeholders, including actually even members of Mark Carney's own Liberal Party.
00:11:33.460 Notably, Nathaniel Erskine-Smith called it fiscally irresponsible.
00:11:38.300 The Conservatives, of course, called it fiscally over-responsible, citing overspending.
00:11:42.040 The NDP were concerned over job cuts to the public sector.
00:11:45.120 I believe that the job cuts are quite substantive.
00:11:47.680 They're 15% in some cases.
00:11:50.820 The Bloc Québécois said that there was underspending on key areas.
00:11:54.680 Environmentalists said that there was insufficient green transitioning focus.
00:11:59.300 Public polls also showed that there were split views with the muddled messaging in the budget,
00:12:04.360 and economists were probably the most critical, and that includes the Parliamentary Budget
00:12:08.340 Office itself.
00:12:10.100 Their biggest concern, and I think it's a valid one, is that Canada's debt burden is not necessarily
00:12:15.960 being reported on as honestly as it could be.
00:12:18.820 Let's just put it that way.
00:12:20.100 The PBO's report accused the government of overinflating capital investments by approximately
00:12:24.880 $94 billion through an overly expansive definition that reclassifies operating expenses as capital
00:12:30.980 spending.
00:12:31.420 This goes against what we consider to be standard accounting practices throughout the rest of
00:12:37.280 the world, specifically in developed countries.
00:12:40.380 countries.
00:12:41.380 Also, there isn't a lot of action in terms of bold strategies to produce productivity, specifically
00:12:47.760 when it comes to innovation or competitiveness.
00:12:50.480 That's especially concerning given that Canada's economic growth is so anemic as to almost be
00:12:55.200 non-existent.
00:12:56.200 It's currently at a modest 1.1%, which is one of the weakest growth rates in the G20.
00:13:01.940 And it is also seen as feeling short on ambitions with band-aid solutions and extra bureaucracy
00:13:06.380 instead of reforms to unleash industry.
00:13:09.380 A good example might be the housing accelerator plan, which has resulted in very few new housing
00:13:14.480 projects.
00:13:15.480 Housing builds in Canada are actually down.
00:13:17.820 And this goes back to our first conversation that we were having, Isaac, about immigration
00:13:22.320 levels.
00:13:23.320 Mark Carney, I don't believe that his budget provides what Canada needs in order to have its infrastructure
00:13:31.700 keep up with the increasing demand that is present in Canada due to these massive immigration
00:13:38.540 numbers.
00:13:39.540 And so I would say, yeah, again, across the board, virtually everybody is opposed to this
00:13:43.640 budget.
00:13:44.640 And I'm not surprised that it passed through the House of Commons, which is such a slim
00:13:47.940 vote.
00:13:49.740 That's it for today, folks.
00:13:50.740 Thanks for tuning in.
00:13:52.740 You can stay on top of new episodes every weekday by subscribing to The Daily Brief on iTunes and
00:13:57.840 Spotify.
00:13:58.840 Also, while you're at it, make sure to hit us with a 5-star rating and please leave a review.
00:14:03.840 Hopefully, thanks to everybody.
00:14:12.080 Thank you for joining us
00:14:13.680 today.