Juno News - September 20, 2026


Carney pushes Canada closer to European Union

Canada’s global ranking in education falls to record lows

Episode Stats


Length

16 minutes

Words per minute

170.39

Word count

2,866

Sentence count

111

People

Also mentioned:

Harmful content

Hate speech

9

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 Well, after initially denying it, Prime Minister Kearney now says Canada is, in fact, moving
00:00:10.540 towards associate member status with the EU. Our guest today is Professor Ian Lee at the Sprott
00:00:18.060 School for Business at Carleton University. Welcome, sir.
00:00:22.880 Thank you for inviting me, Mark.
00:00:24.720 Okay, so do you have any idea what this means, what it means for Canada, what it means for
00:00:29.620 Canadians, especially on the economic front. I think that's probably the biggest concern and
00:00:34.660 the sovereignty front. Right. You're absolutely right. I think this is still very, very pie in
00:00:43.580 the sky. It hasn't been fleshed out. I certainly know what the full status membership means in the
00:00:50.520 european union um it's a pretty uh pretty uh rigid structure um it's uh compared to other systems
00:01:00.280 point one uh point two there the and more to your point of the economics i've been studying the
00:01:07.480 european union for years and years i in fact had a european union passport courtesy of my late
00:01:12.860 father who was a brit um and i was automatically entitled and obtained a british slash uk passport
00:01:19.060 which I had for many years is a sort of a curiosity piece not that I ever used it
00:01:23.480 and then of course until UK pulled out and then it no longer was valid in the EU
00:01:28.580 I've also traveled by my own calculation over the last 40 years to Europe
00:01:33.960 over 80 times teaching in Central East Europe after the wall came down in 1991
00:01:38.620 that's a third of a century ago now so I'm very familiar with Europe and I'm
00:01:42.220 certainly not I want to make it clear to listeners I am not anti Europe I love
00:01:45.400 Europe I love the old castles and the cathedrals and the cobblestone streets
00:01:48.800 That's not what we're talking about
00:01:50.700 And many Canadians have very warm, friendly feelings
00:01:53.640 Towards the European Union
00:01:55.140 Because many of them have parents or grandparents 0.94
00:01:57.260 That came from there, as I did
00:01:58.840 The issue is the economic decline of the European Union
00:02:04.440 And right away, somebody listening may say
00:02:06.440 Well, that's not fair, that's not true
00:02:08.380 Then they should immediately go to Mario Draghi's report
00:02:11.080 At the European Commission
00:02:12.780 Mario Draghi is the former governor of the European Central Bank
00:02:16.880 And then the Premier of Italy
00:02:18.100 a PhD in economics, who wrote a devastating critique of the decline of European competitiveness.
00:02:24.180 He documented it, very high levels of regulation, declining innovativeness, high levels of taxation.
00:02:33.480 They've got many, many problems. And the one that wasn't mentioned yesterday or today,
00:02:41.300 my Mr. Carney, is, I think, the biggest crisis of all facing Europe. And it's what is called
00:02:46.320 China Shock 2.0. Anybody listening or watching this, you and I talk, can Google that phrase
00:02:53.900 because in the last 12 months, there have been some excellent papers and op-eds written by
00:02:59.620 very serious people, including the Federal Reserve Bank and the United States published a paper on
00:03:04.560 it. Some of the European think tanks have published on it. And I'll just be right to the
00:03:09.380 point. China Shock 2.0 is China very publicly deciding that they're going to go way up the 0.72
00:03:16.100 the value-added chain into advanced manufacturing. They already are the largest single manufacturer in
00:03:21.460 the world. They have 35% of the world market share in manufacturing. They are a powerhouse
00:03:27.860 like no other. And there is grave fear in Europe that they are going to hollow out German and 0.99
00:03:36.220 French and Italian manufacturing. That's the core of the European economy. I mean, the German
00:03:42.520 automotive industry is world famous and the fear is they're going to get hollowed out and they're
00:03:48.780 going to lose millions of jobs if hundreds of thousands or millions of jobs and and china shock
00:03:54.240 1.0 we knew about that took place in the early part of the uh century of this century when it
00:04:00.000 hollowed out the rut and created the rust belt of the united states you know ohio and and and those
00:04:05.720 states that led to guess what the election of donald trump so where i'm going with this and
00:04:12.300 And I mean, I hope they can turn it around, but they have a large number of serious problems.
00:04:17.440 Productivity is going down.
00:04:19.800 The OECD says that their social programs are unsustainable. 1.00
00:04:24.100 They have very serious problems with illegal immigration.
00:04:27.940 And on the legal immigration side, and I'm being, this is not in Mario Draghi's book.
00:04:32.820 I'm just saying it from my own experience, going to Europe many, many times.
00:04:35.880 They have done a very poor job of integrating legal immigration, not to pat Canada on the
00:04:41.580 or the U.S., but U.S. and Canada has done a much, much, much better job of integrating 0.98
00:04:48.440 immigrants, whereas in Europe, they have put them into these immigrant ghettos, the
00:04:52.400 banlieue, as the French call them, and they're not integrated as they are in North America. 0.88
00:04:58.640 So they've got taxation that's very high. They have regulatory barriers that are getting
00:05:03.320 worse and worse. Innovation is declining. Productivity is declining. Mario Draghi showed
00:05:09.260 that Europe, the European economies, have lost 50% of their exports in the world. In the last 30
00:05:18.600 years, their share of world exports has declined by 50%. The Chinese are eating their lunch. 1.00
00:05:27.040 And so they've got an incredible number of problems. Let's be real. Crime is up. Repeat 1.00
00:05:33.060 offenders are released on bail. Police responses are slower than ever. And in many places,
00:05:38.760 law abiding citizens are expected to just hope nothing bad happens. That's not good enough. And
00:05:44.420 that's why I'm very pleased today to be telling you about Berna. And I'm so pleased to have this
00:05:48.480 partnership with Juno News because I actually own one myself. I bought one before we ever had this
00:05:53.200 deal with Berna. So what is Berna? It is a non-lethal self-defense launcher that gives you
00:05:59.260 real protection without carrying a firearm. It looks like a firearm. It kind of feels like a
00:06:04.140 firearm, but it's not. It's non-lethal. So Berna launchers look and feel like a real handgun,
00:06:08.960 but they don't use bullets. Instead, they fire powerful kinetic rounds designed to stop a threat
00:06:13.900 from a distance up to 60 feet without lethal force. Here's why it matters. You don't need a
00:06:19.760 firearms license. You don't need a background check. There's no waiting period. There's no
00:06:24.460 permanent life-altering consequences if you're forced into the situation where you have to
00:06:29.840 defend yourself. Use the link in the description or visit junomarketplace.com slash Berna for
00:06:34.540 special offers. Make sure that you're prepared. It's better to be safe than sorry. Yeah, I want
00:06:40.260 to ask you further to what you just said, having referenced the Mario Draghi report, and it's clear
00:06:47.680 by the numbers, which you've just stated, that Europe is in a state of decline and has been for
00:06:52.000 decades, perhaps. Given all that, and also given Carney's long-standing ties to the European elites,
00:06:58.300 is this move intended to inject new life in the alliance
00:07:02.480 more so than it is in helping Canada?
00:07:04.400 In other words, does Carney have divided loyalties
00:07:07.520 or even loyalties that really are directed more
00:07:11.140 at saving the EU than it is at saving Canada?
00:07:13.900 What do you think?
00:07:15.120 I'll be honest, I don't know what goes on in his mind
00:07:18.400 or I'm not a psychologist,
00:07:20.180 but I can say it slightly differently
00:07:22.800 to address your question in a different way.
00:07:24.600 I think that, and this is just my view, studying all these numbers for years and years and reading
00:07:30.840 incredible numbers of studies, including the Draghi report, I think that Europe needs Canada
00:07:36.220 a lot more than Canada needs Europe. Now, having said that, yes, of course, we want to diversify.
00:07:42.280 We want to become less dependent, not eliminate our relationship with the states, in my judgment,
00:07:47.420 but we want to diversify by exporting resources to Asia Pacific and, of course, to Europe,
00:07:53.640 because they do need our resources.
00:07:55.640 Even if they're in decline, they have no natural gas.
00:07:58.720 You know, Putin, they cut off Putin understandably improperly because of his invasion.
00:08:03.780 They don't have natural resources of any of any major magnitude.
00:08:08.320 So they need us.
00:08:10.720 The benefits that Mr. Carney spelled out this morning in his speech, which I did watch,
00:08:17.060 I thought I was sitting here watching that saying, well, we can get those benefits now
00:08:22.440 through the free trade agreement where's the value added the incremental advantage by this
00:08:29.340 unstated unclear ambiguous uh associate member status and uh what cost do we have to give up
00:08:39.120 do we have to give up and give them some form of taxation some revenue share uh sharing some of
00:08:45.580 their costs i mean this is why we need a lot more information i think we can achieve what we want
00:08:52.420 through straight old-fashioned trade agreements,
00:08:55.620 you know, such as the CETA,
00:08:57.760 the Canada-European Trade Agreement.
00:09:00.200 I've supported every free trade agreement
00:09:02.000 Canada has negotiated since 1988.
00:09:04.760 Free trade removes tariffs.
00:09:06.160 They don't put them on.
00:09:07.420 They facilitate and enhance trade.
00:09:09.500 And so the list he gave of industries
00:09:11.860 that can benefit from this new proposal
00:09:15.840 can be benefited,
00:09:18.000 can achieve advantages through the CETA
00:09:21.320 if europe good this is a very good point for everyone 10 of the 28 countries of europe have
00:09:28.120 not even signed off on the existing european canadian trade agreement which was negotiated
00:09:34.920 roughly 10 years ago and that is less controversial than associate member status so i'm not sure i
00:09:42.280 mean this is fraught with economic issues it's brought with methodological issues sovereignty
00:09:47.720 issues are we going to have to give up any sovereignty to achieve this so there's he's
00:09:52.680 going to the prime minister is going to have to come up with a lot more information for the
00:09:56.840 canadian people before anybody can say oh yeah this is this is going to be a great deal i am
00:10:01.880 skeptical a couple of questions before we wrap things up in light of this sudden pivot towards
00:10:08.360 europe it doesn't lend credence to the idea that americans have put out about what happened to the
00:10:13.880 trade deal. Did Canada intentionally blow that agreement up at the last minute, as has been
00:10:19.720 suggested by people like Scott Besson, for instance, and Jameson Greer, using that as a pretext for
00:10:25.320 delivering Canada to the EU? Was that the intention all along? And I take your point
00:10:31.160 about not being able to read Carney's mind, but would that make sense to you?
00:10:36.200 Well, my interpretation was similar, but not the same. It wasn't completely contradictory,
00:10:41.240 but it wasn't that different i i think what happened and again analyzing the data that is on
00:10:47.160 the record three i believe three premiers came out in the five days before the uh the agreement was
00:10:53.480 before canada walked away and said premier manitoba i really don't like this deal at all
00:10:58.840 premier quebec said that and then how many of the other seven premiers privately communicated that
00:11:03.800 to mr carney we don't know nobody said behind publicly what they did i think what happened was
00:11:11.240 that as the Prime Minister briefed the premiers, debriefed the premiers on the contents of that
00:11:17.180 agreement that they had that morning, on that Friday morning, enough premiers said to him,
00:11:22.140 you know, we're not going to support you on this. And so I think Mr. Carney realized he didn't have
00:11:27.060 enough political support in his mind to take it to the game people. And so he walked away. And so
00:11:33.760 instead of saying, well, I walked away because I have a deal that my own premiers don't agree with,
00:11:39.280 he instead blamed it on the americans uh for the reasons that he provided so i'm not sure it was
00:11:46.840 connected it was related to the european his plan for europe because i think he's too he has too
00:11:53.000 much experience and knowledge as an economist he's very aware of the deep problems of europe
00:11:58.180 mario draghi if i'm not mistaken is a is a friend of mark carney and mario draghi is a very
00:12:03.880 distinguished economist and he just laid it out in that report you just you can't argue with the
00:12:09.180 is empirical, massive analysis of the deep structural problems in Europe. And I'm certain
00:12:15.220 that the Prime Minister of Canada knows that. So I think that today, this is more political optics
00:12:20.320 to say to the Canadian people, look, I'm fighting for you, I'm working on behalf of you to find
00:12:25.000 alternatives to the US. So I think it's much more of a symbolic and political document than it is
00:12:32.420 an economic document that can become a reality. That being the case, though, Professor,
00:12:38.240 we're already seeing some backlash from the americans from the trump administration i mean
00:12:43.000 overall what would this do what would entering into this into a formal agreement with the eu
00:12:50.320 as associate member even though we don't really know what that means what would that do to our
00:12:54.760 relationship our trade relationship um and otherwise with the united states i'm gonna
00:13:00.260 again i don't i don't agree with anything mr trump does i don't agree with tariffs i'm not
00:13:05.780 here to defend trump whatsoever at all but i can study the data on the record uh trump already said
00:13:11.740 that this could be lead to very serious blowback uh with increased terrorists okay we know his
00:13:17.460 position already i found it very instructive that the republican senator from from maine
00:13:23.100 who is a very mainstream republican she's been the senator there for i think 30 odd years
00:13:29.640 and i watched senator collins and i watched her on cnn and she said i am completely against the
00:13:37.380 trump tariffs he's a republican i'm against the trump tariffs i'm against what's how canada is
00:13:41.780 being treated but this is not helpful she said last night the the the uh outreach to by canada
00:13:50.240 to europe and and senator collins is a mainstream reasonable a thoughtful republican she's not a
00:13:58.940 a flamethrower an extremist and so when the mainstream are saying that this is not helpful
00:14:05.820 and that you know in the in terms of the relationship of the united states i'm going
00:14:09.580 to listen to her because i think she has a lot of uh credibility and and so that's what really got
00:14:15.580 my attention when senator collins is talking like that there's going to be other senators in the u.s
00:14:20.940 senate who are thinking what she is saying out loud there she's gone her own way on on other
00:14:26.620 issues as well. She's known as a not, well, I wouldn't say an anti-Trump entirely, but this is
00:14:34.200 a person who is very independent in her thinking, and she's trying to win in the midterms. But
00:14:39.540 would this be the end of our ongoing friendship and relationship with the United States,
00:14:44.960 or maybe the start of something new? How is this going to play out with the Americans?
00:14:49.040 well you've asked i think the the 66 billion dollar question what will this do a to the
00:14:56.660 negotiations which are not occurring right now mexico's at the table we're not and secondly
00:15:01.680 even more more catastrophic or potentially catastrophic what's this going to do with
00:15:07.320 kuzma is this going to be the next step to the we're going to see a tweet one morning or an
00:15:12.300 announcement one morning from the trump white house that they have decided to exercise the
00:15:17.000 uh the uh the six month um trigger clause and abrogate cancel uh kuzma i mean this could be
00:15:24.020 dead this would be devastating to us i believe it would see we'd see it crash the canadian dollar
00:15:28.340 um and you would see capital flight to the states as i've said before so um i don't i can't see us
00:15:34.980 returning to the table in the final two years of the trump administration if we did proceed given
00:15:40.800 what he has said and what some other senators have said some senators have said in the u.s senate so
00:15:46.560 it looks like the next two years are going to be very tough times for canada but if i hear you
00:15:52.280 correctly this could be the final nail in the coffin for kuzma if we do this with the eu is
00:15:58.600 that right could it could i'm not predicting it but he is uh he was so forceful in his opposition
00:16:04.700 to this agreement and we know that we are not at the table mexico is and we know that kuzma has to
00:16:12.320 we have to address it. And so this is introducing greater risk surrounding that, and it's going to 0.87
00:16:21.960 make it much more difficult to go forward in terms of negotiations on trade with this
00:16:27.960 administration in the next two years. Professor Lee, thank you so much for coming on the show.
00:16:32.200 We appreciate it as always. Thanks very much, Mayor. Thank you.
00:16:36.340 If you enjoyed the show and appreciate independent journalism, please consider becoming a premier
00:16:41.220 member of Juno News by going to junonews.com backslash straight up. It helps us do what we
00:16:46.740 do here. Thank you so much for tuning in. We'll see you next time.