Juno News - December 29, 2025


Carney's 'Green' Agenda still lurking?


Episode Stats

Length

25 minutes

Words per Minute

184.0918

Word Count

4,733

Sentence Count

356

Misogynist Sentences

5

Hate Speech Sentences

8


Summary

Chris Sims talks with Dr. John Robson about carbon taxes and why they are bad for the economy and the planet. Chris Sims is the Alberta Director of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation and host of the show The Fighter with Chris Sims.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Welcome to The Fighter with Chris Sims. I am Chris Sims. I'm the Alberta Director for the
00:00:10.560 Canadian Taxpayers Federation. Thank you for making us a part of your week. This is, of course,
00:00:16.140 a very special time of year where folks are celebrating Christmas and Hanukkah and hopefully
00:00:21.220 getting together with their loved ones and reflecting on the year. We have a very nice
00:00:26.220 show for you coming up, speaking with one of my longtime dear friends, Dr. John Robson. If you
00:00:32.660 have not heard Dr. Robson talk about Charles Dickens, you're missing out. Go find that stuff
00:00:38.060 on YouTube. We are going to be speaking with Dr. Robson about things like carbon taxes. Where
00:00:43.860 exactly are they? How much are we paying? Yes, the consumer carbon tax is gone, but boy, oh boy,
00:00:50.380 Prime Minister Mark Carney seems really happy with his industrial carbon tax. Alberta seems to be the
00:00:57.100 first test kid. So who's going to be next with a six times higher industrial carbon tax? And why are
00:01:04.620 we doing all this anyway? And you have to stick around for this. I can't believe I'm saying this
00:01:09.820 out loud, but Hollywood made a movie about George Orwell's animal farm, but the capitalists are the
00:01:18.600 bad guys. I kid you not. I have to ask Dr. Robson about that because he has an amazingly funny take
00:01:24.460 on it. But first, let's do a quick check in with our sponsor. Look, folks, it's time to modernize
00:01:30.040 Canada's rules on nicotine. Alternatives to cigarettes like heated tobacco vaping products
00:01:34.020 and oral smokeless products don't burn tobacco or produce smoke. They aren't risk-free, but the
00:01:39.320 growing body of scientific evidence shows that they have the potential to be substantially less harmful
00:01:43.760 than smoking. Despite this, Canadians are banned access to critical information and even some
00:01:48.400 products. Nicotine pouches remain banned in convenience stores and current laws ban communication
00:01:53.440 about the risks of these products compared to cigarettes. It's unbelievable. The evidence is
00:01:58.140 here. The tools exist. Canadians should have the freedom to know. You can learn more by visiting
00:02:02.240 unsmoke.ca. Okay. As promised, joining me now is Dr. John Robson. He is with the Climate Discussion
00:02:11.120 Nexus, and he is the kind of guy that is able to do a deep dive, a historical deep dive.
00:02:18.000 On all sorts of topics. If you have not watched his documentary on the Magna Carta,
00:02:23.640 that is a banger. You have to watch that over Christmas. Thank you so much for joining us
00:02:28.580 today. Always a pleasure. All right. First off, before we get through our fun with George Orwell's
00:02:34.620 story being mangled by Hollywood, I had to get down to brass tacks when it comes to carbon taxes.
00:02:40.660 I was very happy, frankly, to see the consumer carbon tax gone. I don't know what the price of gas is
00:02:46.920 out your way in Ottawa, but it's around 20 cents cheaper per liter here than it was this time last
00:02:52.360 year. That's because the consumer carbon tax came. But this industrial carbon tax looks like it's
00:02:58.740 gearing up to be a monster. What's your take on this right now?
00:03:03.700 It's a peculiar situation because the federal government has realized that a lot of its climate
00:03:09.400 policies are really bad for growth. And it's realized that Canada has a productivity crisis.
00:03:14.060 I think they genuinely do know both these things. But the way their minds work, you know,
00:03:19.140 the Davos man, what you do is you find some elaborate polysyllables and you play this glass
00:03:23.700 bead game where you create climate competitiveness. So you have the same policies you always had with
00:03:29.560 the same ill effects, but suddenly it's good instead. And the world just can't wait to buy
00:03:34.840 our products because we're climate competitive. And if you look at things like our actual greenhouse
00:03:40.060 gas emissions, we haven't accomplished much of anything. As Stéphane Guilbault congratulated
00:03:46.040 himself on historic measures as though he'd achieved something historic or indeed anything
00:03:50.760 at all. But what we have done is we've driven up the price of energy. And, you know, people have this
00:03:57.600 terrible tendency to treat the economy as though it's a machine. I'm not a big fan of mathematical
00:04:01.780 economics for this reason. You can tally up numbers about employment and productivity per hour.
00:04:07.560 People don't realize that Canada's oil and gas industry is fantastically more productive per
00:04:13.100 labor hour than almost any other part of the economy. But what you need to do is you need to
00:04:18.000 look out the window and ask yourself, what would my life be like if I was out there instead of in here?
00:04:23.320 Or you think you mentioned Dickens, so Bob Cratchit, right? Bob Cratchit doesn't have a coat.
00:04:27.400 He can't afford a coat because Scrooge is such a miser. His house is not well insulated.
00:04:31.880 They can't afford coal. He freezes at the office. He freezes at home. No wonder his kid is sick.
00:04:37.000 And then you look around and the lights are on. The heat is on. You have technology or you
00:04:42.700 wouldn't be watching this program. You have clothes, all of this stuff. The food that you
00:04:47.340 have was grown and transported with hydrocarbon energy. Everything you have, you owe to what
00:04:53.280 Michael Binion calls a modern miracle. And the government systematically makes it harder to get
00:04:58.260 and that you must sacrifice more to have it. And then wonders why our living standards are
00:05:03.440 are sinking. And then they bring in, you know, more and more people. We can't build houses for
00:05:08.460 us if that would fix it because it does things to the numerical calculations of GDP.
00:05:13.640 But our lives are built on affordable, reliable energy. Otherwise, we really would be starving in
00:05:19.480 the dark. We would have terrible diseases because we'd be cold and hungry. And when you're cold and
00:05:23.800 hungry, you get sick and you die. Yep.
00:05:25.840 So you need to think about it in terms of this isn't a sector of the economy. It's the foundation
00:05:32.500 of the economy. It's not about exports. It's about us having food and shelter and warmth and clothing
00:05:38.460 and good things. And the government is deliberately trying to make it harder for us to have all those
00:05:43.740 things and telling us it's making us better off and happier. And it's just such a horrendous mistake.
00:05:49.340 I mean, you could get into other things. You know, William Nordhaus wrote about carbon taxes,
00:05:54.020 Nobel Prize winner. And he said they're the best way to punish people for having energy,
00:05:58.940 provided you get rid of all the regulations and just go with a clear, even on everything carbon
00:06:05.700 tax. And that, of course, the consumer tax they got rid of because it was unpopular and they are
00:06:09.420 unprincipled as well as devious. But at the same time, underneath their unprincipledness,
00:06:13.760 they're principled. They really think they're going to get rid of oil and gas and coal and that we're
00:06:18.620 somehow going to live on windmills and unicorn power. And so they're going to do it in the back
00:06:22.860 door in inefficient ways. And then they're going to call it carbon competitiveness or climate
00:06:28.600 competitiveness as if that made it all not hurt. But it doesn't. These are terrible policies. We
00:06:34.660 could have higher living standards, better prospects for young people, more dynamic housing
00:06:39.640 industry, cheaper food. I mean, also that would have supply management. You could have all this stuff
00:06:44.540 if you just embrace the miracle of hydrocarbons. But then the problem is they think plant food is
00:06:49.840 poison. They go on talking about carbon pollution as though smokestacks were billowing black yuck that
00:06:55.780 was laying waste to the wheat and the corn and the trees instead of causing them to grow bigger and
00:07:01.140 stronger and happier. So, you know, there's no good way to do a bad thing. And they've picked a bad way
00:07:07.480 to do it. And then you look again, you look at those productivity numbers, income per capita,
00:07:12.220 you compare us against the United States, which is not like the land of good policy these days,
00:07:17.240 especially. But we're still falling behind. Europe is destroying itself. And all over the notion
00:07:23.460 that carbon dioxide kills plants and animals, which, you know, greenhouse owners, this is well
00:07:29.500 known, they pump it in in large amounts. It's just bizarre. The earth is in a carbon famine. CO2 levels
00:07:36.280 in the atmosphere are at prehistoric lows, right? They're way below where they used to be in the age of the
00:07:42.080 dinosaurs. And you look at the age of the dinosaurs. Was there runaway heating? Was the landscape on
00:07:47.060 fire? Or were there plants and animals everywhere? Fantastic perfusion of large and dynamic life
00:07:52.800 forms. So that's where we are with carbon taxes, a bad idea implemented in a bad way, and then
00:07:58.840 excused with bad rhetoric. Now I'm wondering what triceratops steak would taste like. Sorry,
00:08:06.100 if it would taste like alligator. And since it's the holiday season, let me give you a fascinating
00:08:11.480 fact about triceratops and all the horned dinosaurs. They appeared at the same time as
00:08:15.640 flowering plants. It's kind of a symbiosis where the plants are growing and advertising their
00:08:20.640 presence and the dinosaurs are rushing over, gobbling them up and then dunging out the seeds
00:08:24.780 and everybody wins. Like that's what I call nature happiness. But if you got to those levels of
00:08:31.720 carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, according to the Mark Carney's of this world, supposed sages,
00:08:35.740 we'd all be dead. I mean, it just, it has nothing to do with the actual history of the earth. That's
00:08:41.360 one of the things they know nothing about history. They do not understand that in warm periods,
00:08:46.080 species proliferate. And in cold periods, life shrivels and huddles. Look at the last glacial
00:08:51.020 maximum. You know, CO2 got down to 180 parts per million. That's 30 parts per million above the
00:08:57.140 death of all C3 plants. And, you know, vast quantities of the earth, apparently so many plants died that the
00:09:03.320 planet got so dusty that it started to absorb heat again. Like that's your dream world. And your
00:09:08.660 nightmare world is the Eocene. It's, it's astonishingly ignorant.
00:09:14.180 You mentioned Prime Minister Mark Carney. I'm old enough to actually, when I was in high school,
00:09:19.480 when junior high school, our program was to survive the coming ice age. And they all meant it. Like it
00:09:25.340 was an earnest thing everybody was worried about. My project got an A. But I wanted to get back to
00:09:30.560 Prime Minister Mark Carney. I haven't actually asked you about this. So I actually don't know
00:09:34.920 what you're going to say. What was your take on this memorandum of understanding that was signed
00:09:40.980 between Alberta Premier Daniel Smith, who I know wants to build pipelines, wants to get rid of the
00:09:47.380 production cap, wants to get rid of the green energy regulations. Like she wants this so much. And then I
00:09:53.620 saw Carney fly in, sign an agreement, and then gloat to the media that, hey, your carbon tax is going to
00:09:59.520 be six times higher now. Like, where do you think this is going?
00:10:04.720 I don't really think it's going anywhere. Again, this is the Davos man thing, right?
00:10:09.460 They have this memorandum of understanding. That's a plan to have a plan for a plan to plan.
00:10:15.880 There's no understanding there. There's no path forward. Nobody knows how they're going to overcome
00:10:21.460 Aboriginal opposition. Nobody knows how they're going to overcome provincial opposition. And Carney's
00:10:27.200 good at this polysyllabic evasions that makes it feel as though it's all okay. And you kind of
00:10:31.880 doze off. And Danielle Smith, you know, she's such a good radio host. But the trouble with her as a
00:10:38.240 politician is that she just doesn't have much spine. I mean, I've had this discussion with her over the
00:10:43.800 years. I said, you can't fight the policy on climate unless you fight the science. And she's,
00:10:47.860 oh, John, we lost that debate. So no, you didn't. You never had it. You never had the nerve to say
00:10:53.900 they're wrong about there being a manmade crisis. They're wrong about the runaway effects. The models
00:11:00.040 take a small warming effect from CO2, and they amplify it through these alleged feedback mechanisms
00:11:05.100 that haven't been substantiated experimentally and empirically seem not to exist. But you never
00:11:11.400 were willing to stand up and take the heat for saying no, there is no 97% consensus. There's a great
00:11:19.200 deal of debate and discussion here. But it's clear that we don't have a climate crisis. And therefore,
00:11:23.560 we don't need emergency measures to fight it. And then she tries to rally around the white flag.
00:11:27.820 And this is what you get. Fortunately, with Carney, what you get is vapor. It's not even congealed fog.
00:11:35.380 And therefore, you know, sort of nothing will happen. But that means no pipelines will happen
00:11:39.000 either. There's no way they're going to build a pipeline. Nobody wants to build one. Who in their
00:11:43.180 right mind would invest in this country when it takes one Aboriginal band possibly conjured up by an
00:11:49.040 American foundation in a major city rather than actually being something that exists in reality
00:11:54.680 out there. And you're paralyzed. And Mark Carney's not going to run over these people because he just
00:11:59.740 bloviates. But you look at Mark Carney's career. What has he ever actually really done? He was a
00:12:06.900 lousy governor of the Bank of England. As governor of Bank of Canada, he bailed early and took credit for
00:12:11.260 things he didn't do. His G fans has collapsed. His austerity and investment budget produced neither
00:12:17.040 austerity nor investment. He's just sly and evasive and very, very pleased with himself. He has the kind
00:12:24.780 of skills that get you somewhere in Davos world. But in the practical world of governing, he's a hopeless
00:12:29.900 case. What has he ever actually done?
00:12:33.640 In the premier's defense, she did dig her heels in with the Alberta Teachers Union, which was no
00:12:39.640 small task. Told them to get back to work, refused to hand over two billion extra dollars and no signing
00:12:45.080 bonus. She's also standing up for serious family issues here in Alberta, which is not my wheelhouse.
00:12:51.120 But on this issue of the MOU and industrial carbon taxes, we just had a poll out like today that shows
00:12:58.680 the vast majority of Canadians believe that an industrial carbon tax on businesses, surprise,
00:13:05.180 is going to trickle down to us. It's going to cost regular Canadians more money. To me, that seems like
00:13:10.980 a no-brainer because, of course, businesses can't eat that cost. If they continue to do business in
00:13:16.480 Canada, they will simply pass that cost on down to us. And here we are back to Bob Cratchit not being
00:13:22.160 able to afford heat for his home. I wanted to shift federally. So we've got this dance going on
00:13:29.060 right now with Premier Smith, wanting all this stuff like pipelines and getting rid of the energy
00:13:34.140 cap and believing the prime minister, I think, when it comes to things like pipelines. I'm much more
00:13:40.300 cynical. I don't see that happening. I hope I'm wrong. I really hope I'm wrong. But like, I've read
00:13:47.280 this book many times. And Mark Carney seemed pretty darn serious when he was writing about how much he
00:13:53.340 loves carbon taxes, and how he views things like natural gas power plants as stranded assets in his
00:14:00.600 envisioned future. What happens? Yeah, exactly. Go ahead, John. Well, he knows how to string these
00:14:07.100 words together. I call it the glass bead game by the Herman Hesse. And it all glitters and it
00:14:12.700 impresses the kind of people he was making a career with. But none of it connects with reality.
00:14:17.660 And this is how he thinks, right? Again, I frequently insist it's not about plots and hoaxes.
00:14:22.200 What you see is what you get. If you want to know Mark Carney's mindset, you read that book.
00:14:26.720 So yeah, he's really into carbon taxes, but he also thinks they'll make us rich.
00:14:30.660 And if he's wrong about that, there's no plan B.
00:14:36.160 There is no plan B. What does this do to Pierre Paulyov as leader of the opposition? I saw some polls the
00:14:42.040 other day. It looks like his numbers are still staying steady and strong. In my opinion, that's
00:14:47.080 because the world is not more affordable. Suddenly, we aren't being able to afford food and houses and
00:14:52.660 things like heat for our homes. People are worried about all this stuff still, even though the person
00:14:57.600 has changed as the prime minister. What does this current issue do to Pierre Paulyov's message?
00:15:04.120 So for example, I think Carney came to Alberta, and he's using us as the first test kit. We're the first
00:15:10.540 guinea pig of his huge cranked up industrial carbon tax. He's going to set his sights probably
00:15:15.260 on Saskatchewan next. What does this do to Pierre's messaging about things like no carbon taxes?
00:15:21.780 I think it helps him. I mean, I think there's a lot to admire about Pierre Paulyov, but I also,
00:15:27.260 I wish he would grow up because there is this sort of snide juvenile campus activist air about him
00:15:35.640 that's holding him back, right? His best friend in the world is Mark Carney and his worst enemy is
00:15:39.900 Pierre Paulyov. He needs to combine the slogans with a capacity to talk like an adult. He's got
00:15:48.180 to show some gravitas if he's got some, and if he doesn't, well, he better try and find some
00:15:52.580 somewhere, which is easier said than done, I realize. But the thing is that people, Jay Budziszewski
00:15:59.500 once said about slippery slopes, he was like, oh, you know, people aren't that logical. And Budziszewski
00:16:04.020 said they are, they're just logical slowly. And it can be very frustrating sometimes. But in the end,
00:16:09.800 if the government says it's going to fix the cost of living and it doesn't fix the cost of living,
00:16:14.280 people will stop believing it and they will start voting for somebody else. And again, sometimes you
00:16:19.060 get situations where the incumbents are terrible and the alternative is terrible and people vote for
00:16:24.140 a terrible alternative because no one will give them a sensible alternative. But if Pierre Paulyov
00:16:29.020 could combine his political skills, again, with a certain capacity to be the adult in the room,
00:16:36.280 because really, no, but Carney's big pitches, he's the adult in the room, unlike that silly Justin Trudeau.
00:16:41.100 And the thing is that Carney, still a lot of people feel that he must be an adult because he has this
00:16:46.920 ponderous demeanor and those nice suits and he doesn't flash socks at us. But in many ways, he's not a
00:16:54.060 responsible person, just a chancer. But Pierre Paulyov doesn't feel responsible. And that's
00:17:00.440 where he's got to change. I remember to sidetrack or apparently sidetrack, Jordan Peterson, you know,
00:17:05.000 the mystery of Jordan Peterson is this. He was saying things that a lot of other people had said
00:17:10.220 and had said quite well. And yet Peterson connected in a way that left many of us gaping with admiration
00:17:19.800 and struggling to oppress envy. And one of the reasons why I think is that Jordan Peterson was
00:17:25.040 obviously serious. He had acquired his knowledge the old fashioned way with blood, toil, sweat and
00:17:32.760 tears. The suffering was etched on his face. And there was nothing flip about Jordan Peterson,
00:17:39.060 even when he was being clever properly, you know, dealing with an argument by demolishing it deftly.
00:17:45.220 You always felt that this man had paid for his knowledge. And Pierre Paulyov does not feel like
00:17:51.720 he's paid his dues. And I think that's a big PR problem because it's a substantive problem.
00:17:57.100 You know, I remember John Peppel saying it was very strange. People were outraged at Donald Trump
00:18:01.980 because he was unfit for office. But when Justin Trudeau came along and was obviously unfit for office
00:18:06.600 and Peppel called him, he was obviously vain and silly. And this is true. He was vain and silly.
00:18:12.100 And eventually caught up with him because people are logical slowly. But Paulyov gives the impression
00:18:17.500 to some extent of being the same, that those slogans come out so readily because that's what's in his
00:18:22.520 brain. And for a guy who supposedly cut his teeth on Friedman and Hayek, he ought to be able to talk to
00:18:27.820 us more like Jordan Peterson. And I think that he needs to do that because we need adults. One of the
00:18:32.520 things when you look at Canadian public policy and all the goofy stuff that's going on, even just,
00:18:36.980 you know, Blacklock's recently asked for details on those alleged bodies at the Kamloops school and
00:18:42.780 the department just sealed everything up. And it's like, that's such a juvenile thing to do. But we
00:18:47.240 live in a very juvenile world. And I think that creates an opportunity for adult leadership. And
00:18:52.820 it doesn't mean you have to be boring. It doesn't mean you have to lose the clever slogans. Adults can
00:18:56.940 have good slogans. But you've got to feel like they arose organically from serious, comprehensive and
00:19:04.480 reliable thinking about things. And that's, that's what Polyev has to bring us. And again, he should say
00:19:10.100 there's no climate crisis, because you either have a climate crisis, and you deal with it, or else you
00:19:14.560 haven't got a climate crisis, and you don't. Will he challenge the science? Will he come out and say, there's
00:19:19.780 no man-made climate crisis? I don't believe that thing exists.
00:19:23.480 I wanted to leave on a fun note, or a sad note, depending on how you want to put it. I think you and I
00:19:29.260 first met many years ago, when I had Atlas Shrugged on my desk. And we had a nice big conversation about
00:19:36.580 things like Atlas Shrugged, The Fountainhead, and then we moved on to George Orwell, 1984, Animal Farm.
00:19:44.060 For folks who don't know, and we have some young people watching, Animal Farm was a parable. It was a
00:19:49.400 very short novel that was a very clear repudiation of Stalinist Soviet Russia. It was taking aim at
00:19:56.880 communism very clearly, all through the book. And it's only, I think, goodness, is it what, even 200
00:20:02.820 pages? It's a short book. The message here was that collectivism and having mass government control
00:20:11.000 was bad, okay? And he just put it in the setting of a farmyard. So there's, you know, basically puppets
00:20:19.440 of pigs and horses and sheep talking to each other. What blew my mind, John, and we're going to play a
00:20:24.940 clip of it here in a second, is that Hollywood has come out with an animated movie actually meant
00:20:31.020 for adults. It says so, that it's, you know, over 16 or whatever. And guess what? It's the capitalists
00:20:37.260 that are the bad ones. Watch this.
00:20:41.340 I want that farm. We should move into the farmhouse. So the humans know we're in charge.
00:20:48.060 You are about to become my new best friend. Pigs and humans working together. I like the optics.
00:20:56.720 Oh, we love the optics. What are optics? I think it's a kind of seafood.
00:21:00.500 Okay. So that tall, angular looking woman with the gray hair, she looks like the bad wife from
00:21:07.540 Rocky IV. But she was a Soviet. In this one, she's a big, bad corporate capitalist person.
00:21:14.380 What's your take on this? Is this just one of those things we should let go and quit fixating on?
00:21:19.740 Oh, absolutely not. I mean, for one thing, you know, the go woke, go broke, right? Hollywood can't
00:21:24.660 make stories anymore because they have bought into this absolutely sterile worldview. But,
00:21:33.620 and again, speaking of gravitas, because Orwell had been a communist. He fought in the Spanish
00:21:37.640 civil war on the side of the communists. He came by his knowledge, honestly, and the pain. He
00:21:44.300 understood these betrayed dreams. And there's, I wanted to quote a line from GK Chesterton. He said,
00:21:51.480 the truth is that all feeble spirits naturally live in the future because it is featureless. It
00:21:56.080 is a soft job. You can make it what you like. The next age is blank and I can paint it freely with my
00:22:01.200 favorite color. It requires real courage to face the past because the past is full of facts which
00:22:06.860 cannot be got over, of men certainly wiser than we and of things done which we could not do. And so
00:22:13.740 they take a masterpiece like Animal Farm in which the animals stage a revolution against the evil
00:22:18.640 oppressors and create basically the Soviet Union. And then it turns out to be even more oppressive,
00:22:24.060 a betrayal of all their hopes, a very stratified society that famous all animals are equal, but
00:22:28.960 some are more equal than others. And in Hollywood, they can't even understand what was being said,
00:22:33.960 let alone why. And this thing will be a money loser. They cannot make the classics anymore.
00:22:39.500 They cannot come up with new stories because they're determined that their feebleness shall be the
00:22:45.320 standard of all things. Instead of going back and making great works in homage to the creative
00:22:52.600 genius. Again, you look what they did with the Lord of the Rings running off with this woke franchise.
00:22:57.740 And of course, who wants to watch that? The reason we like Tolkien's world is because it is deep.
00:23:03.340 It is wide. It is metaphysically grounded. It is deeply spiritual. And it is grounded in traditional
00:23:10.080 Catholic thinking. And this creates magnificence. What they create, it's so trite. It's so obvious.
00:23:17.900 Like, oh, today I write this. Boring. And you see this all the time. They just, they can't leave
00:23:22.740 things alone. Even in the movies of the Lord of the Rings, the more they change the script,
00:23:27.500 especially in the Two Towers, the worse things got. They cheapened all the characters. The Ents were
00:23:33.960 turned into something selfish and frivolous from the magnificence of their decision
00:23:38.340 to attack Isengard knowing they won't be coming back to ducking the war and then blowing their
00:23:44.680 stacks. The last thing a Ent would ever do. And it's this extraordinary unwillingness to recognize
00:23:50.520 the greatness of the past and to realize that we need to live up to it. It doesn't need to live up
00:23:56.780 to us. And so, yeah, the one consolation is this thing will be a bomb. But if they made the real one
00:24:02.740 the right way, it would be a commercial hit. And they need to get back to doing that. And I'd be
00:24:08.380 happy to help them, especially if they pay me generously to write them a script, which will be
00:24:12.040 the actual original. It won't be changed. They could pay me a lot not to change things because they need
00:24:18.780 it. Yeah, they absolutely need it. Dr. John Robson, thank you so much for your time today. I was looking
00:24:25.000 forward to speaking with you all week. It's really a pleasure to be able to even to spend some time
00:24:29.880 virtually with you over subspace during the Christmas season. Thank you so much for your
00:24:33.680 time. Indeed. And Merry Christmas to you, to all of yours and to all your viewers. Likewise. Merry
00:24:39.260 Christmas. Once again, that is Dr. John Robson. You can go check out his work on YouTube. Go look up
00:24:46.200 the Climate Discussion Nexus. He has all sorts of really important topics there, including things like
00:24:52.460 carbon taxes, how much they truly cost us, not just monetarily immediately in your wallet,
00:24:59.240 but how much it's costing us in the ability to enjoy our lives, to heat our homes, to grow
00:25:05.940 nutritious food. He really is able to dive deep into history and apply it as a lesson for today.
00:25:13.840 And turns out that's what his degree is in, is in history. So go check out Dr. John Robson's work,
00:25:19.880 The Climate Discussion Nexus on YouTube. And hey, if you have not done so yet, please like this video
00:25:25.680 on YouTube, subscribe to the channel on YouTube. And if you can, head on over to Juno News and support
00:25:33.380 Juno News, because this is where you will find independent journalism. Merry Christmas and happy
00:25:40.700 holidays to you and your loved ones.