Juno News - April 23, 2025


CBC has LOST CONTROL of the election – and the country (ft. Ezra Levant)


Episode Stats


Length

34 minutes

Words per minute

194.94171

Word count

6,639

Sentence count

464

Harmful content

Misogyny

4

sentences flagged

Hate speech

7

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

In the final stretch of the campaign, Ezra Levant joins Candice to talk about the impact of the debates, and why the media is losing its grip on the narrative and influence in the election. Ezra also discusses the recent Supreme Court ruling that struck down the government's ban on the CBC and True North News.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 I'm Candace Malcolm and this is The Candace Malcolm Show. We have a great episode for you
00:00:10.380 today. We are really in the final stretch of the campaign less than a week before what I think is
00:00:15.820 the most consequential election of my lifetime. And one of the most interesting developments
00:00:20.440 of this election so far has been to see the media, specifically the CBC, and their reaction.
00:00:26.600 I believe they're losing control of their hold over the country. For decades, they have been the
00:00:33.260 arbiters of truth, the self-appointed arbiters of what is news and what isn't. And basically from that
00:00:40.080 debate that happened last week onwards, I think they're starting to realize that they don't have
00:00:45.700 that grip anymore. They're losing control over the country, over their place as being the ones who
00:00:50.900 gets to determine what is news and what isn't. And they no longer get to shape the narrative of
00:00:56.380 the campaign. They've lost control of the narrative. And it is social media and influencers
00:01:02.600 and content creators and independent journalists who are stepping up and having a bigger and bigger
00:01:08.180 influence. I hope this will be the last election campaign that the CBC has any type of influence
00:01:13.980 and control. I hope that they get defunded after this campaign. And I really think that they're
00:01:18.580 starting to realize that they might not have a future in this country. And that is why they are
00:01:23.740 behaving in such an unhinged way. So to talk about this a little bit more in depth, I'm very pleased
00:01:29.580 today to be joined by one of my favorite people, one of my favorite people in the independent media
00:01:33.420 space. And that is Ezra Levant. He's a founder of The Rebel. He's sort of the godfather of this
00:01:38.520 entire movement of independent online media. Ezra, thank you so much for joining the show. It's great
00:01:43.180 to have you. Wow, thank you for this super friendly introduction. I'm normally referred to
00:01:47.760 like a pebble in someone's shoe. So this is a change of pace for me. Thank you.
00:01:52.540 Well, okay, so it's been a week now since those debates. And I just think they were so consequential.
00:01:58.120 And I think that look, Pierre Polyev did a great job. Mark Carney did a terrible job. I think that
00:02:02.820 Mark Carney lost the election on Wednesday night at the French debate, or if not Wednesday night,
00:02:08.500 then Thursday night. His flat responses, his tone deafness, even just that question that he asked
00:02:14.280 to Pierre Polyev asking him why he doesn't have a security clearance and giving Polyev the stage
00:02:19.780 to debunk the entire conspiracy theory behind it. I think that he could have been heading towards a
00:02:25.780 government, majority government. And I don't know if he's lost the entire election, but I don't think
00:02:30.380 that he's going to get a majority government. The polls are starting to reflect that. So I want to
00:02:34.120 get your reaction to the debates themselves. But I think something more interesting or equally as
00:02:39.820 interesting happened in the debates. And that is really watching the CBC and all of the media
00:02:46.160 realize that they don't have control anymore, that the independent press is here to stay.
00:02:52.780 We do have influence over the country. We represent millions, dare I say tens of millions of Canadians
00:02:59.340 are more interested in the questions that we're asking and the way that we present the news
00:03:04.000 than the old guard. They're starting to realize that. So what are your reflections on both those issues,
00:03:09.320 Ezra? I think the debates were good. I think they were illuminating. And I think it was the first
00:03:15.440 time Canadians had seen Mark Carney, really. And I think he underperformed a bit. That said, I don't
00:03:21.460 think there was any particular disasters for him. So I don't think it was quite, I would say it wasn't
00:03:26.100 quite as bad as how you've described it. But you're right, the Mark Carney balloon has started to
00:03:31.420 deflate a bit. And perhaps over the next few days, if that trend continues, it's a possibility you might
00:03:37.240 have a conservative minority. Right now, I still think it's a liberal minority. But you're right,
00:03:42.580 to me, much more interesting was what was happening behind the scenes at the debates. As you know,
00:03:49.400 in 2019, both True North and Rebel News were banned. We both went to court and it was an amazing
00:03:57.420 ruling by the federal court that it was unconstitutional. It violated our charter rights
00:04:02.920 for the government agency called the Debates Commission to keep us out. See, Justin Trudeau
00:04:07.740 nationalized the debates. He turned them into a government agency so he could control them. He
00:04:12.360 even put one of the Kielburgers on the board. It was really weird. But by making a national 0.96
00:04:17.000 government agency, he made it subject to the Charter of Rights. They tried again to keep us out in 2021.
00:04:23.700 Again, we went to court and again, the court ordered them to accredit us. Actually, back then,
00:04:28.320 the court ordered them to accredit 11 different rebel journalists. So here we are in 2025. And
00:04:34.440 we reached out in advance to the Debates Commission and basically said, do you want to do this again?
00:04:39.640 Or do you want to grow up a bit? So they accredited five rebel news journalists. And I know that Juneau
00:04:45.420 had a team there. I was really pleased to see your team there. They were, first of all, it felt great
00:04:50.460 to have friends and allies. And not just you guys, but Western Standard was there. There were other
00:04:56.080 reporters. I don't want to try and list them all. But it felt like there was a growing cohort,
00:05:00.160 whereas it was quite lonely five years ago. Now there's a growing group of, you know, I don't
00:05:05.040 even know everybody, which is a pleasure when you don't, when the movement grows so much that you
00:05:08.600 don't know everyone. And here's the interesting thing. You guys had some really good questions
00:05:14.880 that I would say were a little bit edgy, which is, I think, what a journalist should be towards a
00:05:18.580 politician. The politicians didn't mind. Mark Carney answered you guys, your questions. I thought he
00:05:24.920 actually answered them fairly well. He wasn't shocked by them. He didn't reject them. He answered
00:05:29.900 them. He's a grownup. Like, he's not afraid to answer the questions. If he proposes to engage
00:05:37.160 with Trump and Putin, I think he can handle Juneau news. Same thing with rebel news. Like, Jagmeet Singh
00:05:43.240 doesn't talk to us any time. He's a bit of a powder that way. So no big deal. But the Bloc Quebecois
00:05:49.260 leader answered our questions. And Pier Polly have answered our questions. Here's my point
00:05:53.520 that I'm making, Candace. All of the party leaders were fine with us being there. I did
00:05:58.580 not hear a single complaint from any of the parties that we were allowed in. The complaints
00:06:03.780 came from rival journalists. They came especially from the CBC, which basically launched a campaign
00:06:10.340 to discredit and eject us. There was one moment, I don't know if you know this, Candace, the CBC
00:06:16.180 complained privately to the commission and demanded that I be ejected because I had the temerity
00:06:21.980 to ask a CBC journalist during a commercial break if I would have a chance to rebut his
00:06:26.720 cascade of lies against us. The CBC thought I was so impertinent they tried to get me kicked
00:06:32.220 out. Like, they literally asked and demanded that we be ejected. None of the politicians felt
00:06:39.220 that way. One last thing. I don't know if you have this clip, but Adrienne Arsenault, who's
00:06:43.120 a very senior reporter for the CBC, she was talking about Rebel News and you guys in particular.
00:06:48.920 And in particular, the question by Alex Zoltan, if I've got the name correctly, who asked about
00:06:54.660 how many genders there are. And that's not a trick question. That goes to transgender 0.86
00:06:58.560 policy. The UK Supreme Court just ruled that only biological men are men. This is a very
00:07:04.500 live issue in the United States. It's absolutely relevant in Canada.
00:07:08.120 Well, they asked Pierre Polyev about it like two months ago. And there was no complaints
00:07:11.800 after that question was asked. Yeah. So you guys asked that question. It was well put. And
00:07:16.920 by the way, I think he answered it okay, Mark Carney. Well, he answered it, I mean.
00:07:20.580 Yeah. Yeah. The rage from the other, Adrienne Arsenault said, people might think, what country
00:07:27.200 are we in? And she also said, these debate, these questions did not conform to what was
00:07:35.060 talked about in the debates. And I'm thinking, you're giving it away. You're saying the quiet
00:07:39.580 part out loud. Adrienne Arsenault, Rosemary Barton, and David Cochran, the CBC triumvirate,
00:07:45.200 had ruled that Rebel News and Juneau News, our questions were not the right ones. It was clearly
00:07:51.700 a content disagreement. It was, I mean, and all the questions we asked were asked very
00:07:56.580 politely. So it's not like we were even disruptive. Hey, quick point on that. We have a reporter
00:08:01.420 named Drea Humphrey. And if I was a lefty, I would also say she's a woman of color who is 1.00
00:08:06.720 indigenous. In fact, she was the only black woman in the room, let me put it that way. 1.00
00:08:11.200 She asked a question about residential schools that was off the official narrative. She asked
00:08:16.360 Jagmeet Singh about that, and about the wave of Christian churches being torched. And not 0.63
00:08:23.520 only did Jagmeet Singh ignore her, but here's the thing, Candace, and I don't know if this
00:08:27.200 would have been heard by people at home, because I don't think it was picked up by the microphone.
00:08:30.380 When Drea Humphrey, a dignified black journalist, asked this question of Jagmeet Singh, all these 1.00
00:08:36.100 white liberal male feminists in the press room started heckling her. I swear to God, they were 1.00
00:08:42.540 trying to disrupt her. They were trying to shout her down. You can't quite pick it up
00:08:45.980 on the microphone. It was shocking. Same thing when Alexa LaVoie asked her question
00:08:51.140 en français. I have never seen, it was demonic, the way they were hollering at her. And they
00:08:57.640 say independent journalists are the disruptors and chaotic. It's so clear that this is their
00:09:03.540 little club, and they hate the fact that we're eating their lunch. But you are right, Candace,
00:09:08.380 they are losing their grip and their control. And I'm delighted to see it.
00:09:12.840 Well, I want to pick up on a couple of points that you made there, because
00:09:15.940 I could kind of hear a little bit of the heckling that was going on. And it did made me think
00:09:20.600 that, you know, this isn't just about, you know, who gets to the line first to ask the
00:09:25.920 question, because it really is, you know, it's open to everyone. And so the fact that they
00:09:29.560 were very upset that Juno News got two questions to Mark Carney, it's literally just because
00:09:33.960 our guys got up 10 minutes before the debate ended and stood in line, right? That's it.
00:09:38.480 That's all it took. The fact that Rebel had four, well, the CBC also had four. You talked
00:09:44.480 about the panel. And I do want to show it because I don't have the bit where Adrienne
00:09:49.660 Arsenault is saying that she had to check if she was still in Canada. I played it on the
00:09:52.760 show last week. I think that parts of creative music. But I want to show this bit of the three
00:09:57.500 of them, Adrienne Arsenault, Rosemary Barton, and David Cochran. And just the way that they're
00:10:03.040 talking about it, to me, this clip just perfectly illuminates the point that we're trying to
00:10:07.720 make here, which is that these people are losing their control over the country. So let's play
00:10:11.740 that clip, please.
00:10:13.300 Just watching it, having watched the debate, David, you know, it's the debate was one type
00:10:18.720 of conversation. This feels very different.
00:10:21.340 I think the debate commission is going to need to be accountable for what's kind of
00:10:26.860 happening here. They moved the time of the debate the day before. They kicked the greens
00:10:30.980 out the morning of. And they've opened up the scrums and the press access to a bunch of
00:10:35.620 groups who sometimes are registered charities or have been defined by their owner as not actually
00:10:40.240 a journalistic organization or have been ruled by the federal court to not be a journalistic
00:10:44.720 organization. And there are substantive follow-ups on these things for these leaders. They only
00:10:51.100 get 10 minutes, and it's being monopolized by people who are asking on issues that are
00:10:56.460 not central to the campaign, and certainly were not central to this debate.
00:10:59.800 And we have about 30 seconds left. Anything of substance that you heard there, policy-wise,
00:11:04.400 or that you've heard tonight that you hadn't heard before?
00:11:07.100 Not in any of these scrums, because they are being taken over by other agendas, right? And not,
00:11:13.480 I think, necessarily helping a broad swath of voters. Some people maybe do want to hear some
00:11:18.540 of these questions and answers. But broadly, I don't think they represent sort of what the
00:11:23.420 ballot box question is about. We can talk more, yeah.
00:11:26.120 Okay, so just a couple of things as well that I want to point out about that exchange there.
00:11:29.980 So you're right, Adrian Arsenal's talking about how these weren't the points from the debate. So
00:11:35.280 clearly, they believe that the establishment media gets to set the agenda for the entire election,
00:11:41.620 and that that's what you have to talk about. So the scrums have to be dominated by the exact same
00:11:46.180 questions that were already covered in the debate, which, to me, doesn't make much sense.
00:11:50.580 And then you have David and Cochrane kind of try to explain to everyone what we were even doing
00:11:54.820 there. And he totally gets his facts wrong, right? He's like, one of them is a registered charity. So
00:11:58.820 I guess that's talking about True North. And then he also says, a federal judge has determined that
00:12:04.020 they're not journalists. Well, that's the opposite of the truth. Actually, the federal judge was the one,
00:12:08.260 as you mentioned, in 2019, that ruled that we were journalists, and therefore we had to get let in.
00:12:13.220 And then you have like a very somber Rosemary Barton come in, kind of again, repeat the point
00:12:18.420 that this isn't what the campaign is supposed to be about. And this is my favorite part. She says,
00:12:24.100 other agendas have taken over. So she's kind of implying there that, you know, we have our agenda,
00:12:29.780 the legacy media, the CBC agenda. And these are, this is another agenda taken over to just ask
00:12:35.700 questions that millions of Canadians would like to know. From my perspective, you have the debate,
00:12:39.620 they missed a whole bunch of issues, right? They really want to talk about divisive social issues
00:12:44.180 that hurt Pierre Polyev. So they spent 10 minutes of the campaign, of the debate, Ezra, talking about
00:12:48.260 abortion. This is a French debate. The last 10 minutes were on abortion, even though all of the
00:12:51.860 candidates agree. I wish they didn't, but all of the candidates agree on that issue. So that's,
00:12:57.060 that's the type of social issue you're allowed to talk about, the ones that they've decided for the
00:13:00.820 last 25 years to use as an attack against conservatives. You know, the entire craze over radical gender 0.95
00:13:07.620 ideology, that's not allowed. The question about residential schools, I wish someone had asked
00:13:12.340 that question to Mark Carney, right? During the English debate, he said to Jagmeet Singh,
00:13:18.180 no, I don't believe that Israel is committing genocide against the Palestinians. I don't think
00:13:22.340 we should use that word. I would like to know whether he believes that Canada committed genocide,
00:13:26.580 because his predecessor, Justin Trudeau, said not only that Canada did commit genocide, but he said that
00:13:31.860 Canada is committing genocide, like present tense, right? So why don't we ask the leader of the
00:13:38.100 Liberal Party whether he maintains that same view, right? They don't want to talk about the social
00:13:42.260 issues that could harm the Liberals. And you also, just one final point, David Cochran there was
00:13:48.020 complaining about the leaders' debate commission. He doesn't like anything about them, so they're kind
00:13:53.940 of lobbying. We saw there was an interview right before the English debate where he had the debates
00:13:58.980 commissioner on grilling him. How come you let these journalists in? You know, how did you let this
00:14:04.500 happen? And there he's complaining that the Green Party didn't get let in. Okay, the Green Party didn't meet
00:14:09.060 the requirements, right? The requirements have been set in stone for the last two election cycles. They
00:14:13.940 objectively didn't meet those. Why does David Cochran want the Green Party in so much? I'll tell
00:14:19.220 you why I think, because it helps Mark Carney. The more people on stage, the less Mark Carney has to talk, the
00:14:25.620 less chance there is that he'll stick his foot in his mouth. The entire strategy of the Liberals and
00:14:30.020 the CBC is run out the clock, right? They created a narrative. The narrative is Trump bad, coming
00:14:35.860 against Canada, only Mark Carney can save us. And so all their entire agenda is just to help Mark
00:14:41.700 Carney run out the clock. And I think they just, it's just so obvious. They've exposed themselves. And
00:14:46.260 and I mean, now we're at this point where we're seeing them sort of grasp their last grasp of power
00:14:52.020 before they get put out. What do you think of all that? Yeah, I mean, let me give you an example. I
00:14:55.940 was thinking about this the other day. In the last two election cycles, the Conservative Party
00:15:00.420 was the focus of the media rage over the carbon tax. Why won't you support the carbon tax? How dare
00:15:06.580 you do this to the planet? And Andrew Scheer and Erin O'Toole answered, I don't think their answers were
00:15:12.660 great, but it was such a central focus of the debates. As soon as Mark Carney says, oh, yikes,
00:15:18.660 I'd better shuck off. I'd better jettison the carbon tax if I'm going to win. All of a sudden,
00:15:25.060 the media that was saying this is the death of the climate, the death of our future, suddenly they
00:15:30.500 show no interest in the subject whatsoever. Really? I mean, could you be more transparent in how
00:15:37.620 partisan you are? That whole thing was just a way to get the Conservatives. And now that Mark Carney
00:15:42.740 has flipped on the subject, they're not interested in it anymore. Being in that room, Candice, was
00:15:50.420 amazing. I should say that about half the journalists in there were just regular folks
00:15:54.820 doing their job. I sat next to a photographer from the Montreal Gazette. He couldn't care less. He was
00:15:59.540 just there to take photos. I mean, there are some really normal people in journalism, but some of them
00:16:03.860 are Antifa activists with a laptop. There was some nut bar from the Hill Times who started screaming,
00:16:09.780 first at Kean Bextie and then at us and some other kook at Ricochet. And, you know, they were so 0.98
00:16:16.420 disruptive. And I thought the word demonic came to mind. The way they went after Drea was demonic.
00:16:22.020 And then I just thought, what is it? And here's my guess of what happened. First of all,
00:16:27.860 I think some of them, like I say, are radical activists. And it was, this was their January 6th
00:16:32.580 moment. Oh my God, independent journalists are storming in. I think second of all, they've been
00:16:37.140 radicalized. They've been convinced by the BS on the CBC that we are all the things they falsely
00:16:43.860 accuse us of. So, so if we were in the room and a bunch of Klansmen came in with hoods,
00:16:48.660 we would freak out and say, what the heck are you guys doing in here? That's how they've been trained
00:16:53.460 and taught and brainwashed into thinking anyone right of center is. And finally, there's the fact
00:17:00.100 that they know we get more views often than they do. I mean, I stopped counting how many views Rebel
00:17:06.820 News got when we hit two billion. I mean, I like it when a video goes viral, but I don't even count
00:17:12.660 anymore. I'm sure you're the same way. And I remember when we started Rebel News a decade ago,
00:17:17.940 I had an inferiority complex. I said, oh, are we really even doing journalism? And we don't have the
00:17:22.580 fancy sets, and we don't have the reach, but we do. And these guys are some artificial last refuge,
00:17:34.180 and they're only there because they're propped up by the government. And that's why they're in panic
00:17:37.940 mode. They know that we run circles around them. They know that we have the love of Canadians. We
00:17:43.220 have to, we don't get government bailouts. And they know that if this election goes the wrong way for
00:17:47.460 them, a lot of the people in that room may be unemployed because for them, their hobby and
00:17:52.260 their politics are being subsidized. Juno, Counter Signal, Western Standard, Rebel News, we live based
00:18:00.020 on the support of our people. And the CBC can't say the same. And I think it's all these things
00:18:06.340 combining. And we were in their safe place. And let me just throw one last thing. I know we're,
00:18:12.820 we don't have too much time, but there was this moment where Michelle Cormier, the head of the
00:18:16.900 debates commission was doing, doing the touring, getting beat up by all the regime journalists
00:18:21.540 for letting us in. And it was in one interview, he said, there's only so much I can do to limit
00:18:27.380 the free press. He literally said that out loud. Other journalists were saying, why do you let the
00:18:32.820 Rebel News in? He said, I agree with you. I didn't want to, but the court says I have to, shouldn't,
00:18:39.140 I have to follow the law. Like he was apologizing. He was apologizing for allowing free speech.
00:18:45.700 I don't know. These guys can't lose hard enough. I, I, I, I mean, from our perspective,
00:18:52.260 Ezra, it's like, it's just like good versus evil. It's so black and white. Like there's no gray here.
00:18:57.060 It's like these people hate free speech in a free press. And yet they say it. Imagine putting a guy
00:19:03.540 in charge of a debates who says publicly, I wish I could do more to limit free speech. He said that.
00:19:10.020 He really said that that was his excuse. When Radio Canada, the French CBC was saying,
00:19:14.740 why didn't you ban these guys? He said, guys, I tried.
00:19:19.060 Okay. I want to get to just one other thing. I know we don't have you for much longer.
00:19:23.060 I'm going to do this one. And then, and then I want to quickly talk about the news and the two
00:19:26.900 campaigns. But this was probably one of the most satisfying, delicious things that happened.
00:19:31.620 So first I'll show you, uh, after the French debate, Rosemary Barton accused your journalist,
00:19:37.700 Drea Humphries of trafficking in misinformation. And she fact checked her live on television, 0.99
00:19:43.380 claiming that yes, there have been remains of indigenous children found in various places
00:19:47.540 across the country. Let's play that clip.
00:19:49.140 I have to sort of address the elephant in the room. How are these people chosen to answer these
00:19:55.620 questions? And I don't know if either one of you have an answer for that, but I think there will
00:19:58.820 be people at home saying some of these seem like odd questions. Some of them aren't getting answered.
00:20:03.460 How come we've heard so often from this one particular outlet? Any idea what's going on there?
00:20:07.780 There's, there's three, uh, right wing, um, very right wing, uh, media. We can call them media websites
00:20:14.340 that are present, uh, in there. They get in line to ask a question like anybody else. Their accreditation
00:20:19.780 has been approved by the commission of debates. And so they get the right to stand in line and ask a
00:20:25.060 question, uh, that they choose to ask. In this case, you saw Mr. Singh, and this has been his position
00:20:30.580 for some time to refuse to answer questions, rebel news in particular, traffics and misinformation,
00:20:36.580 facts, uh, lack of facts. And, uh, as you heard in that question, which was, uh, woven with some truth
00:20:43.060 and some things that weren't true. Yes, there have been, uh, burnings of Christian Catholic churches.
00:20:48.660 Uh, yes, there have been remains of indigenous children found in various places around the
00:20:54.020 country, which she misrepresented. We'll see if Mr. Poiliev gets any questions from right wing
00:20:58.500 organizations. I would suspect no. As an aside, I love that they refuse to call us journalists.
00:21:03.060 So they call us media websites, very far, right. Okay. So to get to the good part, uh, when she said
00:21:09.060 that I was actually, I was going to fact check it, but then we got carried away with other things because
00:21:13.060 we track this stuff pretty closely, Ezra. And every time they've done an excavation, which
00:21:18.020 haven't, there haven't been very many, right? Most of the time, you know, the, the industries behind
00:21:22.660 the first nations, unmarked gravesting, they really want to drum up the accusation. And then when it
00:21:27.140 comes to the actual report, they bury it. They don't want it done. They don't want to excavate.
00:21:30.740 They've never excavated in cantaloupes where the initial 215, um, soil disturbances were found.
00:21:37.540 And so when Rosemary Barton said that, I thought, you know, she actually believes the propaganda.
00:21:42.340 She believes lies. Cause I think that she was in good faith trying to fact check because she
00:21:46.420 believes that she knows the truth. And the reality is that she's not very well informed
00:21:50.180 Ezra because yes, there have been some excavations. They have never found remains. They have never
00:21:54.980 found remains. And so even the CBC, this is, I'll give someone at the organization credit for this,
00:21:59.860 this fact check popped up April 17th. So here, let me read it. This is what it says,
00:22:03.780 buried at the bottom of a CBC news story, right? Rosemary Barton didn't have to apologize,
00:22:08.100 but they did have to issue a correction for what she just said here. It says on April 16th,
00:22:12.420 during a live broadcast following the French language federal election leaders debate on
00:22:15.860 CBC news network, chief political correspondent Rosemary Barton said, quote, yes, there have
00:22:20.420 been remains of indigenous children found in various places across the country. Unquote.
00:22:24.340 As CBC news has reported on multiple occasions, what several indigenous communities across Canada
00:22:29.220 have discovered on sites of some former residential schools are potential barrier sites or unmarked rape.
00:22:36.100 So no, I mean, even, even in their, even in their correction, Ezra, they twist it and manipulate it.
00:22:41.620 They don't come right out and say it. Fact check, Rosemary Barton, they've never found any remains.
00:22:47.300 They've never found any remains. And they're trying, they're desperately trying. So at least,
00:22:52.020 you know, the CBC has admitted it. And I think Ezra, this goes to show what a great question it was
00:22:56.660 from Drea. And I wish that it was asked to Mark Carney as well, hopefully we'll have that opportunity in
00:23:00.900 the future. Yeah. By the way, Drea Humphrey went to Kamloops and she was puttering around. She actually
00:23:06.740 bumped into the chief and put questions to her. I am certain Rosemary Barton hasn't gone to any
00:23:11.300 lengths to find the truth. And for her to presume to be the arbiter of the truth is a bit much.
00:23:17.220 Listen, one man's misinformation is another man's argument. These are unresolved issues. And this
00:23:24.740 whole industry of fact checking and misinformation is a way of saying you're not allowed to have a
00:23:30.820 different opinion. Everything should be challengeable. I mean, we just came through the COVID-19,
00:23:36.580 everything from where did the virus originate, to do the vaccines work, to do vaccine mandates work,
00:23:44.420 to should we violate civil liberties of people with the Emergencies Act, all of those things are
00:23:49.460 controversies. And we allow controversies, let truth and falsehood grapple. But for them to say,
00:23:55.860 rebel news, traffics and misinformation, they shouldn't be allowed in at all. Well, they get things 1.00
00:24:00.900 wrong literally every day. Sometimes I think you're right. This was misinformation, a mistake by Rosemary
00:24:06.740 Barton. But in other cases, it's very much disinformation, deliberate spin in service of their
00:24:12.820 master, Mark Carney. I'm not calling for the CBC to be banned from anything. And I wish they wouldn't call
00:24:18.980 for me or you to be banned either. I think it shows how brittle their ideas are. They, if they had their
00:24:26.020 way, they would ban us and they would shut down independent websites through things like Bill C63.
00:24:33.460 And I'm quite worried that if Mark Carney wins again, I'm worried he will bring in those censorship laws
00:24:38.740 and he is intimated as much. So there's a lot at stake. You said this was the most consequential election
00:24:44.100 of your lifetime. I believe that's true as well. And I'm a little bit worried. Well, and this just goes
00:24:48.740 to, again, the need for more independent questions. Because why hasn't this been asked of Mark Carney? Why don't
00:24:54.580 we know what his position on Trudeau government censorship laws are? We don't even know basic
00:24:59.220 things as are like, if he loses the election, will he stay on?
00:25:02.660 Yeah. We don't know basic biographical things. When did he move back to Canada? Last year,
00:25:07.780 he told the U.S. Congress, he was interrogated by the U.S. Congress for sort of price fixing and extortion
00:25:13.300 of a carbon company. He was interrogated under oath by congressional lawyers. And he told them he lived
00:25:20.180 in the United Kingdom. This was just a few months ago. When did he move back to Canada? Has he moved
00:25:25.060 back to Canada? Where did he file his personal taxes? His health care card? Is it an Ontario card?
00:25:30.420 Or is it the NHS in the UK? Why have his wife and children not returned back to Canada? Why did he
00:25:36.020 get three passports? Is he really going to give them up? I mean, those may sound like detailed questions,
00:25:42.420 but I think we have the right to know the man who was selected as our prime minister in a botched election,
00:25:49.060 400,000 people registered to vote in the liberal leadership contest. 250,000 of those were disqualified.
00:25:57.220 Only 150,000 out of 400,000 were allowed to vote. What's with that? And the results were statistically
00:26:03.300 so improbable. And no one looked into it. And we're not allowed to ask questions. I assure you that the
00:26:11.300 Chinese Communist Party took a great interest in his leadership vote. I know that because every week
00:26:17.140 there's another emergency announcement by the Canadian intelligence services that China's
00:26:22.020 meddling in our campaign. Well, I mean, imagine instead of just meddling with 11 individual MPs,
00:26:28.180 imagine putting a Manchurian candidate right in the PMO. And I don't know the facts about it because
00:26:33.540 he won't answer the facts. When was the last time Mark Carney spoke to the Chinese embassy or a Chinese
00:26:39.300 diplomat? Do we know the answer to that? I think it's a valid question, considering he literally met with
00:26:43.540 Xi Jinping himself. Why did he take a quarter billion dollar loan from China? Is China the world
00:26:49.140 leader in finance? What were the terms there? What ongoing ties does he have to China? Those aren't
00:26:54.820 conspiracy questions. Those are genuine fact-finding accountability questions that you vet someone
00:27:00.820 before you put them in charge of the country. This guy just popped up here after a decade away.
00:27:05.300 We don't know so many basic details about him. And the CBC will do anything to keep it that way.
00:27:10.500 Well, what an utter, absolute failure of media. The fact that you could just,
00:27:14.260 both of us could just come up with a dozen questions that we would easily want to know
00:27:17.620 and ask the prime minister. Millions, and I think tens of millions of Canadians would agree that those
00:27:22.580 are important issues that should have been featured in this campaign. What a total abdication of
00:27:26.420 responsibility by the media. I hope Pierre Polyev wins this election just so that he can blow up the
00:27:32.020 status quo and have a shakeup, allow for different ideas and different opinions to be coming in.
00:27:37.220 Just a final point I want to make about this election and ask you about Ezra is we've now
00:27:42.100 seen that the primary emotion driving liberal voters is fear. The primary emotion driving
00:27:48.020 conservative voters is hope, hope for the future, optimism for change. That's kind of a flip of how
00:27:52.900 the election usually is, or at least the media try to pretend and accuse the conservatives of running
00:27:58.100 on hate and division and using dog whistle, all this nonsense. Whereas this time is actually the case.
00:28:04.340 But I think the liberal attitude around the campaign shows that they're losing. You know,
00:28:09.540 the fact that Terry Gilliam assaulted your reporter outside the Debates Commission last week. I mean,
00:28:14.900 this is a campaign that is like flailing out of control, spiraling in negativity. The viral image
00:28:20.820 of the Bramford boomer, I think, an actual liberal campaign worker with the double middle finger at an
00:28:28.420 independent journalist for daring to just be at a Mark Carney event. And she's not the only one with
00:28:37.300 having that experience. You know, there were multiple images of older, angry liberal supporters
00:28:42.660 or staffers. You know, they're really kind of angry and deranged. And then you contrast that with
00:28:49.300 Pierre Polyev, who, you know, he's been getting big union endorsements, the former liberal premier of
00:28:55.220 British Columbia. Gordon Campbell just came out and endorsed him. Moses Simner, the Canadian
00:28:59.860 Association of Retired Persons. Like he's building this sort of optimistic coalition. I think that
00:29:07.140 they have the momentum going into the final stretch. They've closed the gap right at one point earlier
00:29:11.220 in the campaign, the liberals and Mark Carney were up by 10, 12 points. Now, by most accurate, honest
00:29:17.780 pollsters, it's neck and neck, like a tie. Maybe I think that that Carney has lost this election. It's just a
00:29:24.100 matter of who's going to get the minority. Is it going to be liberal? Is it going to be conservative? Mostly,
00:29:28.340 how is that vote going to be distributed? Final thing is early voting. My husband and I went out
00:29:34.500 and took part in the advanced poll voting and Record Elections Canada say a record 7.3 million Canadians
00:29:44.740 voted in the advanced polling, which means that we might get the most, we might set a new record,
00:29:50.180 Ezra, for the highest voter turnout ever. So I think Canadians agree this is an incredibly
00:29:54.580 important election and really it's like which path we're going down? Fear and anger and the double
00:30:01.060 middle finger towards others or this campaign of optimism and hope for the future and sort of
00:30:07.860 restoring the Canadian promise? What do you think? David Coletto is one of my favorite pollsters. He's
00:30:13.220 with a polling company called Abacus and he had a tweet the other day that I thought was fascinating.
00:30:17.620 He said, is it true that the Liberals have lost a 12 or 15 point lead in a month? To believe that,
00:30:25.380 you have to believe that they ran a horrible campaign or that the conservatives ran a terrific
00:30:29.620 campaign. Or, he posited, is this response bias to pollsters? Let me translate into plain English.
00:30:35.620 David Coletto, a pollster, is saying that people were not telling the truth to pollsters. And I had to
00:30:41.540 Google response bias because I didn't really know what it meant. It means things like you want to tell the
00:30:46.740 pollster what you think is socially acceptable. Or there's a peer pressure going on so you'll say
00:30:51.700 one thing on the phone but you'll mark it at X on a ballot differently. I thought that was a very
00:30:58.180 interesting thing for a pollster himself to say because I think he was trying to say how did this
00:31:02.100 swing so much? And I think it's so being, there's a drumbeat, you've got to support Carney, you must hate
00:31:09.620 Trump. It's just fascinating to me. I wonder if the large turnout is people saying, whoa, this is
00:31:18.740 being, there's some hoodwinking going on here. I don't know. I am nervous about it, but I know that
00:31:24.740 the Liberals are dark. Let me tell you a super quick story. Remember Button Gate? About two weeks ago,
00:31:30.820 the Liberals were caught handing out fake Trump-like political buttons at a conservative end to sort of
00:31:38.100 plant them on Pierre Polyev as if Polyev was saying Trump-like slogans like stop the steal
00:31:44.260 or lock him up. This was part of the Liberal messaging strategy that Pierre Polyev is a mini
00:31:49.460 Trump. You can't trust him to deal with Trump. He's just like Trump. So this was a total campaign effort
00:31:54.580 to smear Polyev as being in Trump's pocket. So the dirty tricks part was planting these buttons
00:32:01.140 at a conservative function. It was only because their election staff were loudly boasting about it in a bar.
00:32:07.780 They were overheard by actually a CBC reporter. I don't know if you know this, Candace, but I actually
00:32:12.420 own the trademark to one of the buttons that was used, Make Canada Great Again, if you can believe it.
00:32:16.900 I trademarked that a few years ago. So they stole my property as part of their campaign dirty tricks.
00:32:22.740 So I'm suing the Liberal Party for trademark violations, suing the Liberal Party and John Doe's one and John Doe two.
00:32:29.620 I want to know who did it. I want to know, did this go to the top? I suspect it did, Candace, because this was a total
00:32:35.780 campaign strategy, and Mark Carney said he didn't fire the malefactors. He called it, quote,
00:32:42.020 totally unacceptable, but then he said he, quote, reassigned them. Really? So my lawsuit obviously
00:32:48.420 will not be heard before the election, but I intend to pursue it. First of all, I want to enforce my
00:32:53.460 property rights. You can't steal, Make Canada Great Again. We trademarked that. We're selling hats, etc.
00:32:58.340 But I want to know who did it. And I think that they're lying about it. I think Mark Carney
00:33:05.620 pretends to be an ethical, gentlemanly guy. But I think he will do anything to win. And the Liberals
00:33:12.580 around him will do anything to win. Gerald Butts, Katie Telford. It's Justin Trudeau's old crew. All of it.
00:33:18.660 So I just wanted to tell you that little story. They are dirty tricksters. They accuse conservatives of
00:33:24.180 being rough. They're the dirty tricksters, the Liberals themselves. Wow, Ezra. Well, that's
00:33:28.580 interesting. We're going to have to follow up with you on that lawsuit. Good for you for filing it.
00:33:33.540 And hey, we really appreciate your time and your insights, Ezra. And thank you. You've really charted
00:33:37.620 the way for independent media. I really mean it. We wouldn't be here at Juneau News or at True North
00:33:42.500 without your leadership in this field. So keep up the great work and good luck with the lawsuit.
00:33:48.260 Thanks for those very kind words. You keep up the fight. All right. Thank you so much. This is Ezra Levant,
00:33:53.060 founder and leader of The Rebel. Well, folks, this is all the time we have for today. We'll be back
00:33:57.700 again tomorrow with all the news. I'm Candice Malcolm. This is The Candice Malcolm Show. Thank you and God
00:34:01.380 bless you.