Juno News - CBC journalist HUMILIATED twice in ONE DAY, Carney Liberals SLAMMED in new press freedom report

00:00:00.000 Hi, I'm Candace Malcolm and this is The Candace Malcolm Show. We have a great episode for

00:00:07.200 you today. We are coming off the election and let me just tell you folks, the numbers

00:00:11.240 here at Juno News are spectacular. I want to share a few of them with you because I'm

00:00:15.080 really excited and really proud of what we have built together. I say together because

00:00:18.660 we would not be here without the audience, without viewers like you, without the people

00:00:22.260 who are subscribers to Juno News that pay us $10 a month for all of our news. You're

00:00:26.720 the ones that have propelled this and kept this going. So during the election, during

00:00:30.060 the shortest election that you could possibly have, only five weeks, we published 413 exclusive

00:00:35.880 news stories at Juno News. We had 10 million plus page views across social media, so just

00:00:41.900 X and YouTube. Our videos were viewed 14.2 million times. Our newsletter, which we send out every

00:00:49.040 day, was opened 9.1 million times. It was viewed 9.1 million times. And our premium subscribers

00:00:55.840 grew by 30%, folks. So we are so excited to be part of the movement of independent press

00:01:02.460 and independent journalism in Canada. We are on a mission to replace the CBC and I think

00:01:07.680 we're going to get there. I'm going to ask you just take a quick second and like this

00:01:11.340 video. It really helps us with the YouTube algorithm. But it's not all good news because

00:01:16.400 as I'm going to report today, Canada has fallen in terms of world press freedom. So you know

00:01:22.280 this and I know this, that Canada is not as free as we used to be. We don't have free speech like

00:01:27.860 we used to. And now it's verified, not by a conservative group. This isn't just a right-wing

00:01:31.440 talking point. This is a factual statement based on the World Press Freedom Index. So to talk about

00:01:38.100 this a little more, very pleased to be joined by my friend, Sheila Gunn-Reed. Sheila is a journalist

00:01:42.380 at Rebel News, Rebel Media, and she's the president of the Independent Press Gallery of Canada.

00:01:47.460 Sheila, welcome to the program.

00:01:48.660 Candice, thanks for having me on the show.

00:01:51.400 Okay, well, I saw this on X and it was really disappointing, but not surprising. So can you walk

00:01:56.660 us through this Reporters Without Borders World Press Freedom Index?

00:02:01.160 Sure. Yeah, the Reporters Without Borders, they put out an analysis of press freedom every single

00:02:06.780 year. And it tracks government overreach, arrests of journalists, violence against journalists,

00:02:14.840 and government censorship. And Canada now ranks 21st in the world with a score of 78.75. Now,

00:02:24.300 the reason this is significant is that this is a huge drop from just 2024. In 2024, Canada was at 14th

00:02:34.520 place. And overall, now this is what I think is really significant, is that, you know, how people

00:02:39.580 used to talk about how mean Prime Minister Stephen Harper was to journalists. But journalists had a

00:02:44.000 really good under Prime Minister Stephen Harper because we've dropped 13 places since 2015 when

00:02:51.900 the Liberals took power. And that is post the Liberals dumping a pile of money on the mainstream

00:02:57.720 media, bailout after bailout. This is post the government overreach into journalism. So we have

00:03:04.420 to remember Bill C-11 that handed basic control of the internet over to the CRTC. So that's the

00:03:12.740 broadcasting bureaucracy. This is post C-18. C-18, as you know, forced tech companies to bankroll

00:03:20.060 failing legacy media outlets. And that prompted Meta to block Canadian news outright, right, where a lot

00:03:26.720 of people consumed their news, but also where a lot of independent journalists were seeing their reach

00:03:33.640 grow. And then now we've got Carney threatening to clean up online pollution, he says, is flowing our

00:03:40.000 way from the Americans, which, of course, is a euphemism for purging any sort of dissenting voices.

00:03:45.560 So this is troubling. And this tracks with exactly the time the Liberals took power.

00:03:50.860 Wow, I mean, it is scary. And just for that context, right, like even us at True North,

00:03:55.920 they built a company called True North. And we had a huge audience on Facebook. That was our number one

00:04:01.120 audience in terms of social media. Without warning, they just completely shut it off. We had to migrate

00:04:06.900 over to YouTube. And thankfully, we've been able to build up a large audience on YouTube now. But it

00:04:12.000 took a while, it took a few years of catching up. And, you know, again, thankfully, we have an email

00:04:17.620 list as well. But if you don't, I mean, it's so easy to get cut off from your viewers. And that's the

00:04:22.060 scary thing, right? Like when you have a government as tyrannical and opposed to basic freedoms, as we see

00:04:28.380 with the Liberals, you never know what they're going to cut off next, never know what they're

00:04:31.540 going to do next. I want to read what Mark Carney has to say on Press Freedom Day. So it was on

00:04:36.080 Saturday. And he writes this on X. He says, a strong, independent and free press both defines

00:04:41.220 and defends our values as Canadians. Now more than ever, we need to protect our public forums and

00:04:46.400 defend strong and reliable Canadian voices. So there's so much you can read into that. Sheila,

00:04:51.360 first of all, as we all know, Mark Carney banned independent reporters from any of his events through

00:04:56.840 the campaign starting in Edmonton with his campaign launch. He even had the police get involved to do

00:05:02.220 everything they could to stop independent reporters from asking questions. The only time throughout the

00:05:06.480 entire campaign that independent journalists got to ask questions was at that leaders debate because

00:05:12.060 we had a court order saying that we're journalists and they had to let us in. And now he says, now more

00:05:16.400 than ever, we need to protect our public forums and defend strong, reliable Canadian voices. So all I read

00:05:22.700 from that is he wants more power to shut down his adversarial voices and defend, meaning publicly fund

00:05:31.480 journalism, which is pretty much exactly how we got into this mess. I also want to play from Mark

00:05:38.120 Carney. This was a resurface clip. This came up during the election campaign, April 10th, 2025. And this is a

00:05:44.400 clip of Mark Carney basically saying the threat is from social media platforms. He says that they've become a

00:05:51.960 sea of racism, misogyny, anti-semitism, Islamophobia, and hate. And he says, my government will act. Let's play

00:05:58.020 that clip. Large American online platforms have become seas of racism, misogyny, anti-semitism,

00:06:05.140 Islamophobia, and hate in all its forms. And they're being used by criminals to harm our children.

00:06:12.880 My government will act. So that's terrifying. What do you think of that?

00:06:20.640 Well, I mean, he says large American platforms, but we know who he means. We know that he means X,

00:06:25.980 which is the one place where people can still freely speak their mind. And it's where a lot of

00:06:30.560 journalists are. So he's going to make sure that the journalists see exactly what he wants them to

00:06:36.820 see. But I also think it's interesting, his focus, right? We know that WeChat meddled in at least the

00:06:45.020 last two elections. And according to the site task force, this latest one, they were using it to target

00:06:50.800 conservative candidates. And yet, nary a word about WeChat ever. If you are looking for a social media

00:07:00.640 platform that is meddling in our democracies, targeting democracy voices, targeting Canadians,

00:07:08.560 you would crack down on WeChat. But it's very clear that Mark Carney is insistent on coming down on X.

00:07:15.900 And I'm worried about what that means. Because will that mean X is just going to say Canada is just

00:07:22.880 not worth the hassle and not allow access to Canadians? I wonder. We saw what Meta did. Meta said,

00:07:29.680 I'm not going to pay the shakedown. And so now Canadians are not allowed to post news links there.

00:07:35.600 So I wonder what this means for us. But this is, I think, hinting at a renewed Online Harms Act.

00:07:42.640 Well, it's interesting that they, you know, they talk, what we think about as free speech,

00:07:46.420 what we think about as independent journalism, they think is like a threat to the democracy or like

00:07:50.840 hate speech. And so they're literally, like, I can't imagine Canada, Canadian political discourse

00:07:55.840 without Twitter or X. Like, I actually can't imagine so much of the conversation, so much of the

00:08:00.760 dialogue, so much news is broken there. And it's almost like a collaborative form, right? Like,

00:08:04.960 I scroll through X every morning to figure out what to talk about my show. I see, you know,

00:08:09.440 tweets from you or tweets from other people in the space. And that's kind of how I get up to speed

00:08:14.240 and what, you know, what I want to dig into, what I want to research, what I want to talk about on my

00:08:17.960 show. And the idea that that could just go dark because Mark Carney decides that, you know,

00:08:22.600 it's bad for us is truly, truly terrifying.

00:08:26.400 Well, and again, look at Mark, what Mark Carney's focusing on. Did he say that it was a direct

00:08:31.760 attack on democracy, that the debates cancelled the media scrums? Actually, he never said really

00:08:38.420 anything about that. He never said, you know, that he never had a problem with journalists having to

00:08:45.620 fight the government to get into the debates. He, there's no possible way he is completely unaware

00:08:52.000 that his campaign kept calling the police on journalists over and over and over again. And

00:08:58.700 this isn't just targeting right-wing journalists or conservative journalists. We saw Kareem Assad,

00:09:04.560 who I don't really know where she falls down on the political spectrum. And I kind of like it that

00:09:08.340 way. She was basically persona non grata at Carney campaign events. And I don't think that's going to

00:09:14.740 change. We haven't really seen him be open and accessible to independent journalists. They've had

00:09:22.480 to shout their questions the way Chris Dacey has from the street or Alexa Lavoie last week from the

00:09:28.200 street. I can't imagine that things are going to change for the better.

00:09:32.440 Well, and there's, it's so tightly controlled, like folks might not understand this. Even

00:09:36.940 for the election night, right? We tried to send Sue Ann Levy. Sue Ann is a professional journalist,

00:09:42.300 a retired reporter for the Toronto Sun. I believe she wrote for the paper for some 30

00:09:46.760 plus years, right? She is by every definition, a mainstream media journalist. Now she works for True 0.96

00:09:53.920 North and they wouldn't let her in. They wouldn't let her in. And it really is like, if you're not part

00:10:00.600 of the government funded journalist click, like if you're not part of either the CBC or one of the

00:10:07.960 other outlets that takes money from the government, they literally just won't let you in the building.

00:10:12.680 I mean, it's, it's honestly, it's, it's, it's almost like a communist system, right? They say it's free

00:10:18.600 speech and, and premium of the press, but really it's controlled press because they only let people

00:10:23.720 that they've previously given money to or screened or decided that they're part of the Canadian

00:10:29.820 journalism establishment. They won't let anybody else in. And so it, it skews everything about

00:10:35.260 Canadian politics. Like the entire election campaign, the narrative was set by the reporters

00:10:39.800 in the room who were asking questions day in and day out. And you exclude half the country by

00:10:44.500 excluding independent press and all of the people who get their news from us. And you're not really

00:10:49.320 fighting a fair, fair battle because they're fighting the issues, both conservatives and liberals

00:10:53.380 are fighting an election based on the left-wing issues. The issues that the left-wing media decide

00:10:58.020 are the issues. And they're not talking about the issues that we care about and the things that

00:11:01.740 we want to know about, the things that we're uncovering and digging up. And so it's just

00:11:05.540 fundamentally unfair. And it's, it's, it's funny that they don't even recognize that.

00:11:09.800 Well, I think they, I think they do because I think they know they lose on the issues that normal

00:11:15.140 people care about. Crime, housing, immigration, cost of living, inflation. They know that if they are

00:11:24.400 forced to campaign or argue or defend the liberal positions on those issues, they lose every single

00:11:29.560 time. So what, how do you avoid talking about that? Well, you just make sure that the people who are

00:11:35.520 going to ask those sorts of questions are no longer in the room. And I think we're also missing a really

00:11:40.540 important part of this. And that is that the mainstream media, the taxpayer funded government

00:11:47.160 money contaminated journalists are the enforcers in all of this because the government knows they

00:11:52.840 can't enforce this directly a lot of times because that will result in a charter challenge. But you

00:11:59.200 know who can enforce the exclusivity and the boring questions asked by the mainstream media? Well,

00:12:04.280 that's the parliamentary press gallery. So they, this is this little cabal of journalists who get

00:12:09.700 together and say, we need exclusive access to these politicians. And so we can't let our competitors

00:12:17.080 come in here and expose us for not doing the job that we're paid to do on behalf of Canadians. So they keep

00:12:23.080 journalists like those at Rebel News out of the parliamentary press gallery. We don't get to ask the

00:12:28.380 politicians questions. And the media continues to get worse and worse and worse. It's like watching it slowly

00:12:34.980 circle the drain of a toilet bowl, because it's just they keep doing things that reinforce just how bad they

00:12:41.420 are. And the government keeps giving the money correcting them from getting the, I guess, the market

00:12:48.280 correction they so rightly deserve. So I mean, you have to remember, there's, it's not just the government,

00:12:53.800 there's this cabal of journalists that are acting as enforcers on behalf of the government.

00:12:59.360 Well, it's so the most obvious, the time that this is the most obvious, I think, is watching the CBC. I

00:13:04.500 don't take any joy in watching the CBC. But when clips circulate, I pay attention. And I want to

00:13:09.560 point to this interview that was done with Andrew Scheer, Conservative MP, and CBC's Power and Politics

00:13:14.660 host, David Cochran. This happened late last week, where they're talking about monetary policy, right?

00:13:20.760 And sure, there's two schools of thoughts when it comes to monetary policy. There's sort of like the

00:13:24.920 Keynesian liberal idea. And then there's more like the free market conservative ideals, right? So Andrew

00:13:30.140 Scheer is talking about it from a conservative perspective. And David Cochran is

00:13:33.960 fact checking him with false information. Okay, so this is a bit of a longer clip. It's about a minute

00:13:39.020 long. I'm going to play it. And then I'm going to take a second to just reinforce again why David Cochran

00:13:44.060 is just promoting liberal ideas. He's lying about what's happened. And he's pretending that he's the

00:13:50.320 arbiter of truth. And he's trying to fact check a conservative MP. It's really unbelievable. Let's play that clip.

00:13:54.700 I'm incredibly optimistic about our ability to build off of our gains this time. And I'm optimistic that

00:14:01.100 we'll be able to finish the job in the next slide. Right. But you're part of me not be able to rely

00:14:04.560 on post-COVID inflation crisis that was fueled by, you know, war in the breadbasket of Europe.

00:14:11.200 David, you know this. You know that inflation is caused when governments print money.

00:14:16.160 Well, okay. That's what the liberals did. The liberals flooded the economy with brand new cash.

00:14:20.160 They spent money. They didn't print money. The Bank of Canada did not increase the number of bank

00:14:24.700 notes in circulation in the economy. They used settlement balances. They used settlement balances to buy

00:14:29.720 government bonds to put liquidity. I'm not being dishonest. They created money out of thin air.

00:14:35.960 They massively expanded the money supply. You know this. They did not permanently increase the money

00:14:40.020 supply, Mr. Scheer. But anyway, I don't have an argument on monetary policy. They used settlement

00:14:43.200 balances to buy bonds to lower interest rates to put liquidity into the banking system. And then

00:14:47.360 they removed those settlement balances over time. So are you denying that there are that there is more

00:14:51.980 currency, whether it's digital or real, in the Canadian economy today? Are you denying? I'm saying

00:14:56.200 they use settlement balances and you're calling it money. There may be a small marginal increase,

00:15:00.640 but you know, it was, it is not the, anyway, everybody had, all right. Yeah. Okay. So that

00:15:06.200 sounded like a debate between a liberal MP and a conservative MP over monetary policy, but it

00:15:10.860 wasn't. CBC is actively out there pushing the liberal line. Okay. And it's a distinction without

00:15:15.120 a difference. Anyway, he's saying, oh, it was these settlements. So basically the idea is, yes,

00:15:19.660 the government of Canada pushed a whole bunch of money out, but they have a plan to retreat it and pull

00:15:23.840 it out eventually. So it's not the same as printing money, even though it has the same effect as

00:15:28.800 printing money. And that is exactly what has caused inflation. That is what we can all agree on. And

00:15:32.780 it was just so, to me, it was just so icky to see David Cochran just like really, you know, putting

00:15:38.260 his, digging his feet in. And I swear he has liberal talking points in front of him. He is repeating

00:15:43.460 the lines that Mark Carney and Mark Carney's staff and office gave him to read. So it's like, you know,

00:15:49.220 what's the point of even having liberal MPs? Why don't we just have CBC journalists

00:15:52.560 debate conservatives on the issues? The idea that the CBC is any kind of a, you know,

00:15:58.860 a neutral platform or the people who get to fact check anyone else, they have absolutely no business

00:16:04.000 fact checking because they don't have the facts on their side in the first place. What did you think

00:16:08.020 of that? You know, it's as much as I regret having to see Andrew Scheer go through that, it's nice to

00:16:15.640 see that we are not the only people that David Cochran lies about. As you know, David Cochran went on

00:16:22.400 national TV and said that Rebel News accreditation had been revoked from the post-debate scrums. That

00:16:28.240 was completely untrue. He maybe wasn't wise enough to keep his powder dry. I think that's what he had

00:16:35.720 hoped his conversations with the debates commission would turn into. But I mean, this is what $1.4 billion

00:16:41.700 and a promise to increase CBC funding by $150 million more buys you. It buys you a network that

00:16:52.660 acts as the communications arm of the Liberal Party of Canada. There was absolutely no bias there. And

00:16:58.260 you can, you can tell, you know, Andrew Scheer, or I'm sorry, there's absolutely no balance there. And

00:17:03.460 you could tell that Andrew Scheer, it's almost as though his audio was turned down so that they

00:17:08.300 weren't actually competing for the same set of years. It's so interesting. Yes. And our audience

00:17:15.060 will know David Cochran very well by this point, because we showed many, many clips of him during

00:17:19.320 the debates commissions, and just the absolute hysterical meltdown that he had. I have one more

00:17:23.280 clip of him not trying to pick on him. But well, I kind of am because he's so terrible. I am.

00:17:27.700 Yeah, he was speaking with Globe and Mail journalist Robert Fyfe. Robert Fyfe is supposed to be

00:17:32.140 like the grandfather of Canadian journalism. He's the one that gets all the scoops. And he's so stoic. And,

00:17:38.060 you know, a lot of people on the conservative side like him because he'll break stories. He's an equal

00:17:42.020 opportunist when it comes to breaking devastating stories about liberals and conservatives. But

00:17:45.980 here, he kind of like lets the mask slip a little bit. He's talking to David Cochran on the same show,

00:17:50.860 Power and Politics. I don't even want to repeat what he calls Pierre Polyev. I'll just, you can listen

00:17:55.580 to it for yourself. Let's play this clip. You have MPs that have told me that they found it really

00:18:02.060 difficult going door to door, because a lot of people were saying, we like some of the policies you're doing,

00:18:07.980 like, we think your leader's a dick. And we, really. And we think he is, you know, I'm sorry, 0.63

00:18:15.740 but that's what they're telling me. All right. I'm going to have some ombudsman's paperwork to fill

00:18:20.860 out before I go home tonight, I think. But yes, not in such language, but I have heard similar

00:18:26.220 sentiments expressed from conservative candidates. Right. So, okay. So just first of all,

00:18:32.300 the giddy laughing after, laughing hysterically, right? Again, how are we supposed to believe that

00:18:36.620 this is fair and balanced? This is the state broadcaster. This is why we have to pay $1.5

00:18:40.700 billion a year to get, first of all, foul language about the conservative leader. And let me just say

00:18:46.620 to Robert Fyfe, okay, that is not journalism. You're talking about a secondhand account. He spoke to MPs

00:18:52.060 who said that they were saying at the door that someone else said it. So someone else said it,

00:18:56.380 an MP heard it, an MP passed it along to Robert Fyfe. He doesn't, he doesn't speak in specific

00:19:00.860 enough terms for me to believe that that is a specific example, like saying, I have a specific

00:19:06.140 example. I have it on tape. No, he's just speaking broadly. They're basically just mocking Pierre

00:19:10.460 Pauli of making fun of him, saying what they all say about him behind closed doors. And it was so

00:19:14.940 shocking to, well, not so shocking, but so titillating to the CBC host and the other guests that they

00:19:19.580 couldn't control their laughter. They're laughing like squirrel girls about it. Sheila, could you imagine if,

00:19:25.180 I know this wouldn't happen. Imagine if you got invited on the CBC and you said something like that

00:19:29.260 about Mark Hardy. I have a feeling that David Cochran wouldn't be laughing like that. And I

00:19:33.580 have a feeling that you would not be invited back on the CBC if you did that about a liberal leader.

00:19:37.500 What do you think? I think you could hear a pin drop after I had said something like that. But

00:19:44.220 I'm from the prairies. We call what we just saw there a hen party. Usually involves middle-aged

00:19:49.420 women with too much time on their hands, but apparently that's what amounts to a CBC panel these days. 1.00

00:19:54.860 I wonder what that all cost us. Now, again, they're gossiping. This isn't news. This isn't

00:20:02.860 journalism. This is gossiping. And again, I am skeptical now of everything Bob Fyfe says. And that,

00:20:12.780 again, goes back to the debates. Because he went on TV and he said that independent journalists,

00:20:19.420 yours, mine, were in the debates scrum acting up and acting wild. Instead, we were the victims of

00:20:25.420 ongoing workplace harassment at the hands of the CBC and the other journalists in the room. But he

00:20:30.700 went on TV and completely lied, gossiped again, didn't know anything firsthand, just went on TV and

00:20:36.700 gossiped. So now I know that about Bob Fyfe. I'm skeptical that any conservative MP actually talked to

00:20:44.620 him about what they were hearing at the door, because he just peddles in gossip third hand.

00:20:49.420 Right. And if you are an MP watching this, and you're a conservative, don't trust legacy media.

00:20:54.380 What are you doing?

00:20:56.380 Like, just absolutely, hopefully the conservatives will finally take the cue and just stop talking

00:21:01.340 to the legacy media. I think Pierre Polyev did a pretty good job of this, of just saying like,

00:21:04.780 you know what, I don't need you. I'm going to go talk to other people. All right, Sheila, I can't let you

00:21:09.420 leave the show without just asking you very quickly about what's happening in Alberta.

00:21:14.300 Last week, Premier Danielle Smith made changes to the Citizens Initiative Act. And you hear a lot

00:21:19.980 of people online talking about referendum and independence for Alberta. So what's your take

00:21:25.260 on this whole thing? I think this is a long time coming. I've been around longer than I would like to

00:21:34.140 admit. And the separatist movement in Alberta, it sort of ebbs and flows, the tide comes in,

00:21:42.220 and then the tide recedes. I know one of the biggest wet blankets on a separatist movement

00:21:47.820 in Alberta was the election of Stephen Harper, actually all sort of went away. And then it was

00:21:53.100 rising when in the dying days of Rachel Notley's government, and then they got Jason Kenney, and it

00:21:58.380 all went away. And then it sort of came back when Jason Kenney wasn't exactly what everybody thought he

00:22:03.260 would be. And then Daniel Smith came and it went away again. But you've got a lot of people in this

00:22:10.300 province saying something has to change. There's a structural inequity that has gone back to the very

00:22:18.780 beginning, where in Alberta, we cannot vote blue any harder, with the exception of a couple of

00:22:24.220 historically left leaning ridings. Can't get any more conservative, and yet it gets us nowhere.

00:22:30.380 And they do feel culturally incompatible with the rest of the country. They do feel like they are

00:22:37.260 a distinct society out here. And I wouldn't say that they are wrong.

00:22:43.820 Daniel Smith, I think, has done the right thing. She fixed a piece of legislation that was doomed to

00:22:50.460 fail. It was a citizen-led initiatives act that you had to overcome an absolutely insurmountable barrier

00:22:59.020 within 90 days. She's rolled that back to 10% of the last election's number of people who voted,

00:23:08.380 which I think is about 170,000 as opposed to 600,000 before, and extended the time to collect signatures

00:23:14.860 from 90 days to 120. Now, I think this is fair. I think Alberta's future is whatever Albertans

00:23:22.300 should so choose it to be. And I think Daniel Smith, without conceding that she's a separatist,

00:23:28.060 and I don't think that she is, is, I think this gives people an opportunity to actually have their

00:23:34.460 voice heard. And when you see, it's like 30% of people are like, yeah, we'll go right now,

00:23:40.140 thank you very much, without any overtures from the Americans to match our assets, one for one.

00:23:45.420 Once you start talking like that, I think that number just keeps going up and up.

00:23:50.940 I think people write it off as fringe at their own peril.

00:23:55.180 Wow. I think, I think, I think you're right. I've known Premier Smith for a long time,

00:23:59.020 and she's never struck me as a separatist in any way. However, she is someone with a lot of integrity,

00:24:04.220 who really truly cares about Alberta, that will do whatever is best for Alberta, whatever it may be.

00:24:09.580 So that's the story that we are keeping an eye on very closely. All right, Sheila. Well,

00:24:14.460 thank you so much for your time and great to have you on the show. We'll have to have you on again

00:24:18.220 soon. Thanks so much. Thanks, Candace. All right, that's Sheila Gunn-Reed. I'm Candace Malcolm.

00:24:22.300 This is the Candace Malcolm Show. We'll be back again tomorrow with all the news. Thank you and God bless.

00:24:30.140 You're watching Juneau News, Canada's fastest growing independent news network. Our team works day

00:24:38.140 and night to bring you nationwide coverage of the issues that matter. Honest

00:24:44.140 reporting of the stories that put Canadians first. From far and wide, Juneau is doing the work to turn 0.67

00:24:53.420 the dial in the right direction, bringing you the news from the field and in the studio. Wherever it

00:25:01.260 takes us, we get the job done. For you. For Canada.

00:25:12.220 Subscribe today and help us replace the CBC. Go to JuneauNews.com to join the fight.

Juno News - May 05, 2025

CBC journalist HUMILIATED twice in ONE DAY, Carney Liberals SLAMMED in new press freedom report

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript