Juno News - September 13, 2025


Charlie Kirk assassinated at college debate

Topics
Mentioned
Is there a double standard for hate speech in Canada? Smith vows to defend gun owners’ rights

Episode Stats


Length

41 minutes

Words per minute

182.06

Word count

7,550

Sentence count

389

Harmful content

Misogyny

2

sentences flagged

Toxicity

1

sentences flagged

Hate speech

6

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

After Charlie Kirk was shot and killed on campus yesterday, the FBI is offering a $100,000 reward for information that leads to the identification of the suspect. This marks the 15th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks, and we thought it would be a good idea to talk about where we were on that day.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
Hosts, guests, and mentioned names generated with spaCy (en_core_web_sm), reconciled against Wikidata.
00:00:00.480 We are recording today on Thursday, September 11th, 2025.
00:00:06.400 So obviously the big news yesterday was about Charlie Kirk.
00:00:09.520 I'm sure we all have lots to talk about with regards to that story,
00:00:12.780 but it is also the anniversary of September 11th.
00:00:15.280 So I guess I would just ask, do you guys remember where you were on September 11th, 2001?
00:00:20.940 I do. I was at my, I was a child, young child,
00:00:24.920 and I was at my babysitter, Renine, who I called Auntie Renine,
00:00:28.060 but certainly no relation.
00:00:30.040 She was just my best friend's mom who babysat me,
00:00:33.820 and we used to play hockey together, me and that guy.
00:00:36.040 We didn't even play on a team together.
00:00:37.200 We just played street hockey all day when I was at her house.
00:00:42.600 I think I was somewhere in the kind of in the embryo process.
00:00:47.860 I was born in 2002, so I don't have much memory of the event myself,
00:00:51.780 but certainly the post-2001 world is in the world I've only ever known.
00:00:57.440 So definitely I take 9-11 with a very keen interest depending on exactly what we're discussing.
00:01:06.080 The event themselves, the precursor, and of course the post-geopolitical reality
00:01:11.820 with how we got engaged in the Middle East and how air travel and just governments have really grown
00:01:19.580 and everything's changed since that point, that specific point in time.
00:01:23.300 It's a really consequential event for sure.
00:01:26.940 Do you remember where you were when you first learned about 9-11?
00:01:30.640 I think, to be fair with me, I may have heard of 9-11 multiple times throughout my childhood
00:01:35.960 without giving it much attention, but when I was growing up,
00:01:39.920 I actually would frequent New York actually because I had a family living there
00:01:43.280 and I spent some time living there myself as well.
00:01:45.420 So I think when I spent some time in New York as a child around 2008, 2009,
00:01:49.400 I really grasped the reality and grasped the history.
00:01:52.860 When I would sit down at home and I would just watch ABC News Live commercial break
00:01:59.600 and I would see all these commercials about law firms looking for former 9-11 survivors
00:02:05.200 or firefighters that were there that day that have cancer, lung cancer, other damages,
00:02:12.980 and of course trying to get something out of that, I think it's something along the lines of a memorial fund
00:02:18.240 that is out there provided by the government for these victims.
00:02:22.120 So I could understand what a world after 9-11 for a New Yorker's event.
00:02:26.860 Obviously, there were people that had lost family members
00:02:29.740 and people that had experienced some very traumatic events on that day.
00:02:34.900 But again, they're still living with the consequences in terms of families being apart,
00:02:40.700 people dealing with health consequences.
00:02:42.660 I mean, just all the smoke, all the debris, that itself had a massive effect on public health.
00:02:50.260 So when you're in New York, especially during that time, it's only a few years after I was around 2009,
00:02:56.400 so you definitely embrace the reality, the fact, and the history there.
00:03:01.500 I've also visited the memorial multiple times.
00:03:04.000 It's very beautiful, actually, the Freedom Tower and everything else, and the museum.
00:03:08.620 It's a very important part of history to understand, for sure,
00:03:11.200 but not without its controversy and its fair share of conspiracy as well.
00:03:15.520 Yeah, do you guys think we'll be around the campfire in 15 years
00:03:19.320 talking about where we were for the Charlie Kirk assassination, similarly?
00:03:23.520 Anyways, that'll be our first story we'll be discussing today.
00:03:27.040 My name's Isaac Lamour.
00:03:27.900 I'm here with my colleagues, Alex Zoltan and Waleed Tam Tam.
00:03:30.480 Let's hop right into things.
00:03:36.200 Yeah, so obviously, I don't know about you guys, but still reeling a bit from the news yesterday.
00:03:42.460 As you mentioned, Alex, we are recording this on Thursday,
00:03:44.620 so just note that anything we say today is subject to change based on whenever we might end up publishing this.
00:03:50.620 But obviously, Charlie Kirk was brutally assassinated yesterday while doing one of his famous prove-me-wrong campus debates
00:04:02.260 out of nowhere there, and that kind of, similarly to 9-11, which you were just discussing,
00:04:07.800 ground the world to a halt, at least from a media perspective.
00:04:11.680 I don't know if it was like that for normal people, as it would have been with 9-11.
00:04:16.300 But I mean, just so much to talk about with this story and the few details we know.
00:04:22.640 I mean, for example, the FBI, they had someone in custody, but now they don't.
00:04:27.780 And in fact, the FBI is offering a $100,000 USD reward to anyone who gives them any information
00:04:35.320 that could lead to the, not any information, but information that leads to the identification
00:04:40.580 or apprehension of the suspect.
00:04:42.580 So $100,000, I mean, and the fact that this person got away is just unbelievable, really.
00:04:48.600 I mean, we don't know the exact details of the security that Kirk might have had at his events.
00:04:53.320 It's not like there was 100 FBI members there, and this guy just escaped.
00:04:56.740 But as far as we know right now, he was like 200 feet, I think, away on a roof and shot him
00:05:03.320 with some sort of sniper.
00:05:05.180 So obviously, this is at least in some fashion a trained shooter, because I don't think a
00:05:11.280 random person off the street could hit someone in the neck from 200 feet or yards away with
00:05:17.480 a sniper, but I'm no gun expert.
00:05:19.760 And then we're also seeing reports that from legitimate sources, that being Stephen Crowder,
00:05:27.240 I think he got an email saying that there were some sort of transgender and anti-fascist
00:05:31.760 etchings on the bullets that they found, because they did recover the gun and some sort of spare
00:05:37.020 cartridges.
00:05:38.400 So, I mean, I could go on and on, but I mean, this is obviously terrible.
00:05:41.860 Charlie Kirk was a huge proponent of the conservative movement, not just in America, but all around
00:05:48.420 the world, especially in Canada, in North America.
00:05:50.660 I mean, every conservative spokesperson I know probably saw Kirk as a role model, myself
00:05:55.440 included, and I still see him in that way.
00:05:58.020 And we know he had a wife and two young children, three and one years old, who are left behind.
00:06:04.080 I mean, I don't even know what to ask you guys.
00:06:06.220 What are your, I guess, immediate reactions?
00:06:09.940 Because we're just still reacting to this right now.
00:06:13.300 Like, what have you guys kind of been going through with this Kirk assassination?
00:06:18.420 Yeah, I mean, it's horrific.
00:06:28.240 There's really not much more to say than that.
00:06:32.220 I thought I'd be through processing it already, because we just have such a quick news cycle
00:06:38.320 these days, but I think I'm still kind of like in a state of shock a little bit, which is strange
00:06:46.240 because, you know, shootings are so common, you know, not just in the United States, but
00:06:50.880 everywhere.
00:06:52.600 Political assassinations are less common, but, you know, even I just learned recently from
00:06:57.280 this story, I guess, by extension of this story, there was a political assassination in
00:07:00.620 Minnesota, just like a few months ago, which for some reason never came across my newsfeed.
00:07:05.440 I think a lot of people are just discovering that now.
00:07:10.560 Yeah.
00:07:10.920 Another thing, I don't know about you guys, but obviously I saw the video and I, I mean,
00:07:15.060 I say I wish I hadn't, but it was almost inevitable.
00:07:17.560 It was everywhere and people are saying, stop sharing the video just out of respect.
00:07:20.600 But it was, it was obviously terrible to see.
00:07:23.360 Yeah, Waleed, were you kind of in the same spot where you're, you're kind of world just 0.52
00:07:27.940 ground to a halt there?
00:07:29.680 Absolutely.
00:07:30.320 I mean, I mean, the reason why you had awkward silence for a moment with Alex and I seeing
00:07:34.700 who would answer the question first was frankly, I think for all of us as journalists, it's
00:07:38.820 a shocking moment, not just because of the graphic and the tragic nature of it, but just
00:07:43.780 how, I guess you could say relatable that environment is for us growing up.
00:07:47.800 I guess all of us have had some sort of a political discourse in our life on college
00:07:53.360 campuses or off college campuses, you know, talking about the culture war, talking about
00:07:58.280 the things that, you know, Kirk would often talk about on his videos, at his live events.
00:08:02.760 So, you know, that, that environment for us is not an environment that it is hard to imagine.
00:08:07.200 You know, this isn't some foreign land with a very different concept.
00:08:10.440 This is what we've gone through growing up.
00:08:13.140 This is how we got to our positions as journalists today, as we engage in civil discourse.
00:08:17.800 We engage with asking questions and answering questions and debating topics, those that
00:08:22.740 we are very passionate about, and those that just happen to be on the news.
00:08:26.180 We've been part of the kind of, you could say, the TPUSA culture without, you know, being
00:08:31.720 involved directly with that organization or even in the discourse in the U.S., but just
00:08:36.820 the culture of left, right students, just that environment, which I think is very, very
00:08:44.420 important and something that I think Kirk brought a lot of value to because, you know, a lot
00:08:48.780 of people, and I think this is something that's even happened to him in videos before, would
00:08:52.520 kind of ask him, you know, what do you actually do?
00:08:54.700 I mean, what is, what do you make, how do you make a living?
00:08:57.140 You know, what is your job?
00:08:58.760 And Kirk would reply sometimes along the lines of, you know, I come here, I engage on campus,
00:09:03.060 I engage in civil, respectful discourse on the issues that matter the most to me and
00:09:08.200 to our generation, and, you know, obviously talking about political issues and societal
00:09:12.600 issues and, you know, religion and economics as well.
00:09:17.180 You know, I think for a lot of us, we can overlook those issues in our day-to-day life,
00:09:21.900 and I think with Kirk and, you know, his group and his students that he would lead throughout
00:09:26.580 these sessions for years have brought kind of a heightened sense of awareness, a lot
00:09:33.080 of people behind the corner of engaging these topics rather than just thinking about them
00:09:38.520 passively and being outspoken, talking about them, not just holding these feelings and thoughts
00:09:43.400 to yourself.
00:09:44.380 So again, when you see this tragic event to happen to this individual, obviously, you know,
00:09:48.840 there's tragedies happening every day, but you're talking about the relationship that
00:09:52.300 we have with that individual and with his purpose, how much we, you know, either find
00:09:58.400 inspiration from or we seek guidance from that kind of content, you know, when you're thinking
00:10:03.280 about what I want to write about, what I want to talk about, you know, you're probably on
00:10:07.060 social media because that's the best place to fish for new ideas and understand what the
00:10:11.860 discourse of the day is.
00:10:13.720 And, you know, Kirk is, I think there's not a day where I spend more than 20 minutes on
00:10:17.780 Instagram where I don't see a reel with some background music and subtitles of him
00:10:22.280 talking back and forth with a student.
00:10:24.340 It's just, it's been so popular and so much part of a pop culture for sure.
00:10:28.540 I think that's like, sorry, Isaac, I'm going to jump in here.
00:10:31.500 I think it's one of the things that makes this story so troubling and difficult to digest
00:10:35.240 is that if you go back in time to when Charlie Kirk first started coming across people's
00:10:40.460 Instagram reels, that coincided with a time when left-wing politics really just completely
00:10:45.980 took over university campuses.
00:10:47.540 And, and so people were really silenced.
00:10:50.760 And so he kind of became a voice for not only like a silent majority, but a silenced majority
00:10:57.640 where he was, he was brave enough to say a lot of things that people weren't brave enough
00:11:01.540 to say because, you know, they were, they wanted to pass their courses, frankly, and appease
00:11:07.060 their, their leftist university professors.
00:11:09.920 And so I think that's just one of the things that makes this really troubling, difficult to
00:11:13.080 digest.
00:11:13.560 Yeah.
00:11:14.280 And speaking on that from a Canadian angle, Alex, over the last week or so, I think a
00:11:18.260 poll came out showing that the majority of students on Canadian campuses are scared to
00:11:22.900 share their true beliefs.
00:11:23.980 So, I mean, a Charlie Kirk type person in Canada, for example, would be more needed now than ever.
00:11:30.160 But I, obviously we talked about the horrible video, but I also saw a great one yesterday,
00:11:35.740 which was a montage of his clips during the presidential election there and, and Kamala
00:11:42.660 Harris supporters were approaching him and he would just challenge them and say, why would,
00:11:47.120 why do you want to vote for Kamala?
00:11:48.140 For which they had, as you can imagine, little, little, little to say, but they'd debate back
00:11:53.040 and forth.
00:11:53.440 He'd present the evidence and, and he'd do what he was so good at doing.
00:11:56.320 And then in the end, he'd ask them, who are you voting for now?
00:11:57.920 And they would say, Trump, Trump.
00:11:59.900 And, and, and, and, you know, it just, he, he, he, he, he served as such a strong person
00:12:06.220 for the conservative movement.
00:12:07.200 And I, I did want to ask you guys about that.
00:12:09.180 Obviously we, we perhaps no one bigger for the conservative movement in the, in the U S,
00:12:14.900 especially on the college campuses than Charlie Kirk and how, how big he is, how worldly he
00:12:18.800 is, but I'm just curious.
00:12:20.500 And I wanted to ask if you think that just, I was looking for silver linings this morning
00:12:25.540 and this one came into my mind.
00:12:26.640 For example, Alex, do you think that he could even be bigger than he was after his life
00:12:30.860 now?
00:12:31.220 For example, personally, I'm just thinking about this and how much of an inspiration he
00:12:34.740 serves to me to, to move the conservative movement forward in Canada.
00:12:37.760 And I know that there are millions like me, or I'm assuming there are millions like me
00:12:41.800 across the world who are going to be inspired for years to come from, from Kirk and what
00:12:45.880 he accomplished.
00:12:47.640 Well, yeah, people are typically immortalized when they die young, um, high profile people.
00:12:52.480 And so in a sense, you know, whoever did this, um, whatever individual or
00:12:56.620 persons that did this, uh, has kind of made him a bit of a martyr for the free speech
00:13:01.240 movement.
00:13:02.160 Um, I think that's something that his family can take some solace in because I think if
00:13:06.060 there's anything worth giving your life over, it's the right to speak freely and for your
00:13:11.000 children to speak freely.
00:13:11.920 So I think that's really brave and, uh, yeah, but I just hope that the, the reaction to this
00:13:18.840 does not create an environment in which people feel afraid to speak because, um, you know,
00:13:25.020 it's really important, uh, not just for political discourse, but also for each individual's mental
00:13:30.800 health to, to speak freely and say what's on their mind.
00:13:33.960 Um, so, um, I, I also would denounce like any calls to, for violence in response to this.
00:13:41.760 I don't think that that's appropriate either, especially when we don't know, um, as of Thursday,
00:13:45.940 September 11th, 2025, who the shooter is, I think that'd be very presumptive and preemptive
00:13:51.240 people.
00:13:52.260 Um, but I also, uh, I'll reserve judgment because anger is a very predictable initial step in the
00:13:58.000 grieving process and have people digest traumatic events.
00:14:02.080 So, and Waleed, just looking at right-wing versus left-wing discourse and the kind of
00:14:08.740 political battle going on, not only in the States, but worldwide, uh, do you, do you think
00:14:12.800 that this assassination will change anything in, in how that goes forward, uh, on either
00:14:18.420 side?
00:14:20.840 Yeah, for sure.
00:14:21.800 I mean, I think that there will be a part of, let's say the more responsible, mature
00:14:26.520 left, should there be a growth in that demographic that, let's just be honest, some people have
00:14:32.860 to be a bit more reserved with their commentary.
00:14:35.300 There might be kind of recent, resensible process of people gaining their humanity back, especially
00:14:42.240 those that have opted to demonize those with different views.
00:14:46.140 I guess, I mean, when you hear that language of Nazis and, and, and, you know, all kinds of
00:14:50.800 other titles of bigotry, I think there's going to be a lot more room to etch that kind of
00:14:56.060 rhetoric out of the mainstream discourse, at least I think for the right wing on the side,
00:15:01.560 which Kirk represented for the most part, I think there will be both good and bad.
00:15:07.540 I mean, like Alex mentioned, this is also my concern as well as, will there be a chilling
00:15:12.700 effect for people?
00:15:13.660 I don't think the average student as much, but for, let's say the Kirk's counterparts,
00:15:18.720 you know, other people that would sit down, Michael Knowles, you know, all those other
00:15:24.940 talking heads that have, you know, common, you know, table side, because one of the things
00:15:33.380 I liked about, I loved actually, and I still love about these kinds of groups, you know,
00:15:38.480 TPSA and other conservative societies is that they engaging with people on the street in public
00:15:45.720 parks, or in, you know, college campuses, and that's the, the physical manifestation of the
00:15:52.100 public forum.
00:15:53.220 That's, you know, where someone walking by that has no interest in the issue, and someone
00:15:57.320 that happens to finish their class that have prepared the, you know, the perfect gotcha question,
00:16:03.260 and they're all ready to fire on and represent their side, and you never know how it actually
00:16:07.780 comes off when they hit the mic.
00:16:09.060 So, I mean, I don't want to lose that environment, and definitely we lost, you know, perhaps one
00:16:15.500 of the pioneers of this political environment, the political campus sandbox.
00:16:21.340 I think we lost one of those pioneers yesterday, and that's obviously very sad, but I do believe
00:16:27.000 there'll be a renewed sense of appreciation, because it's part of human nature to only appreciate
00:16:31.920 or feel grateful for something when it's removed, and this applies to people as well.
00:16:36.380 So, I think that a lot of, a lot of folks will definitely be much more appreciative of
00:16:41.040 the work that is done by college groups, student groups that, you know, can push forward their
00:16:47.460 narratives, agendas, causes, and passions through public civil discourse.
00:16:52.800 It's a very important lesson for us, and definitely looking forward to seeing how we can all play
00:16:57.780 a part of that, you know, as journalists, you know, engaging those circles and hearing what
00:17:02.180 students and folks on the street have to say, because their voices matter, and conversations
00:17:06.960 are, I think, the best way to open up our differences and resolve them if possible.
00:17:12.640 Yeah, Kirk had a quote along those lines, and I'm paraphrasing because I don't remember it
00:17:16.160 perfectly, but he basically was saying, when you lose public discourse, what you get is violence,
00:17:20.580 so we certainly can't let this act of violence lead to losing public discourse, because that
00:17:26.640 would only lead to things getting worse. Not better, but we could sit on this all day,
00:17:33.100 probably talk for hours. I mean, there's just so much to discuss. But instead, let's talk
00:17:38.120 about guns in Canada, which are having a huge transformation, apparently, because Mark Carney
00:17:45.820 on Wednesday was doing a podcast in Edmonton amid the Liberal retreat with a popular Edmonton
00:17:53.120 podcaster there, and he called the gun ban voluntary, the Liberal gun confiscation program
00:17:57.640 he called voluntary, which, as far as I understand, was the first time that type of language had
00:18:02.820 ever been used, despite this gun ban, of course, being in effect for five years now. And then
00:18:07.980 I actually went downtown today, just outside of the Liberal retreat there, and I found Public
00:18:12.900 Safety Minister Gary Anandesongri on the street corner, went up to him, and I asked him about
00:18:17.440 that. So let's play that clip and see what he had to say.
00:18:19.960 Excuse me, Mr. Anandesongri, can you just clarify the comments Carney made yesterday about
00:18:24.120 the gun buyback program being voluntary? Are you changing the program?
00:18:28.460 Well, the program is going to be launched soon.
00:18:32.780 Is it going to be voluntary now?
00:18:34.980 It's always been voluntary.
00:18:37.720 How is that? Can you just clarify those comments? Is it possible? Because people are,
00:18:42.360 all the gun organizations I'm seeing are super confused. They're saying, is it voluntary all
00:18:45.540 of a sudden? Because from what I can tell, the CCFR, for example, they're all saying that
00:18:49.600 it's been mandatory.
00:18:51.780 Why don't you contact my office and we'll be able to...
00:18:54.860 You have no comments on that for today?
00:19:01.760 Yeah, sorry about the video recording there. I was just trying to get good audio, which I
00:19:07.140 did, which is important. But you might be able to have told how confused I was with his
00:19:11.700 response, which is why I said all I had to say was, how is that? Like, what do you mean
00:19:15.880 it's voluntary, man? For the last five years, we've been at the... Of course, this is a
00:19:20.240 mandatory thing. You're going to confiscate the guns or else, per the public laws, you're
00:19:27.640 going to jail for five years for possessing an illegal firearm. So I don't understand how
00:19:32.660 now they're calling it voluntary because that is a complete change of pace. But hey, Ananda
00:19:39.600 Sangri stood by Carney's comments there. Although in the past, Ananda Sangri has been called out
00:19:46.920 by actually former True North journalist Andrew Lawton, who's now a Conservative MP, because
00:19:51.980 he was debating him in the House of Commons and came to realize that Ananda Sangri did not
00:19:56.420 know basic things about his file, basic things about Canadian gun laws. So it could be that
00:20:01.520 he too is wrong. He said to reach out to his office there, which of course I did, called
00:20:05.720 them, emailed them, no response. So we might have to just wait and see how this develops
00:20:10.160 over the coming weeks. True North kind of breaking this. I mean, Alex, do you think there is a
00:20:16.580 world where this is actually voluntary? Or is this just some sort of liberal gaslighting?
00:20:21.900 Like, oh yeah, it's voluntary, but you're going to go to jail?
00:20:25.220 Well, if it was always voluntary, that might explain why they haven't confiscated any guns.
00:20:33.120 This program is, how old is this program? Doesn't it? Yeah, it's 20, it came from an order in council
00:20:37.740 in 2020. And eventually the list has now grown to over 2,500 firearms being on that banned list
00:20:43.720 and costs, which again, they haven't confiscated any guns, but they're saying costs are expected to
00:20:48.200 be around $2 billion. So a lot of money for, for no confiscation there. I remember there was a big
00:20:52.780 controversy with Bill Blair when he was the public safety minister, if my memory serves me correctly.
00:20:57.060 And he was kind of exploiting the, the tragedy that happened with the mass shooting in Nova Scotia
00:21:02.400 to push through this gun back gun buyback program is what they call it, but it's really a confiscation
00:21:07.560 program. Yeah. You can't really have a voluntary confiscation program. Isn't that just like a
00:21:12.680 paradox? Like that doesn't even make sense. Yeah. The, the executive director of the CCFR,
00:21:20.540 Tracy Wilson, she commented a bit on that. Um, but yeah, no, basically, uh, essentially she said,
00:21:25.820 quote, it's not a voluntary program or a buyback as the liberals in the media have happily called it.
00:21:30.880 It is a confiscation and threat of imprisonment. And then she said, Carney has the gall to call it
00:21:37.220 an opportunity for licensed law abiding firearms owners to turn over their legally purchased property.
00:21:42.080 I mean, and, uh, furthermore, I do want to go a bit deeper into Carney's comments there,
00:21:46.500 because he said, um, that this doesn't target assault rifles. He said this that are, sorry,
00:21:53.840 sorry. He said this exclusively targets assault rifles, which is of course not true. Uh, Rod,
00:21:58.660 Rod Giltaka, uh, the, the CEO of the, the Canadian coalition for firearms rights, he said, uh, this was
00:22:05.760 just a lie. He said, quote, there were no assault weapons banned since May 1st, 2020. Every one of these
00:22:12.980 firearms were for hunting or sports shooting. That's why they were legal in the first place.
00:22:17.220 Because I'll remind people, all of these guns were legally purchased by, by Canadians. Uh, and he 0.97
00:22:22.100 said, Giltaka did quote, the lies of these people are outrageous. So, I mean, yeah, we'll lead. Uh, I
00:22:28.360 mean, what's really to say, uh, do you, do you think that it could be voluntary? I mean, uh, are,
00:22:35.280 are they just blowing smoke here?
00:22:36.740 Well, you know, it reminds me of the time that Trudeau would speak into the media after COVID
00:22:43.740 and talking about, you know, and speaking specifically to the narrative behind the vaccine
00:22:48.780 mandates and the vaccine passports was, you know, no, we never actually forced people, you know, we
00:22:53.700 just locked them out of restaurants, bars, public spaces from being able to work. Uh, we've basically
00:23:01.920 taken out all of the purpose to their lives and all of the purpose to their passions. And we've
00:23:07.760 said to them that you can't really do much. Oh, and also we didn't allow them to leave the country in 1.00
00:23:13.120 any way possible. So it's, it's a really, it's a war of deception here. Um, so I, I don't think this
00:23:21.200 program is, is by any means, you know, optional. It's, that's absolutely the course of why the nature of
00:23:27.680 the laws applied on those specific firearms, but I definitely think this is kind of where they've
00:23:33.840 tried to, you know, like, let's say retract themselves in their approach by adopting a bit
00:23:40.400 more of a lenient rhetoric, because at the end of the day, they're not speaking to gun owners.
00:23:45.760 They're not even hearing much from gun owners, which is why they've gotten to such a, they could
00:23:50.720 say a tone deaf policy talking about, you know, banning specific firearms, which are often mostly
00:23:57.680 owned legally by well-trained, sophisticated, responsible gun owners that have caught through
00:24:03.680 the most sophisticated hula hoops to get those guns legally acquired. And they get their training
00:24:09.920 course completed all assigned by the RCMP while allowing the RCMP to engage their property, observe
00:24:18.560 how they store the weapons and how they operate. I mean, the fact of the matter is you're not going
00:24:23.280 to be able to deal with crime when you're dealing with law-abiding citizens directly and uniquely.
00:24:28.400 You're dealing with people that want to follow the law, not the people who won't. And that's
00:24:34.080 a very important part. So I definitely think if they're going to make any progress in the public
00:24:37.840 security file as it relates to firearms, which there should be definitely a concern for Canadians.
00:24:42.720 We've seen a rise of gun violence across the country, especially in the GTA area.
00:24:47.520 I think if that's going to change, it's going to come down to the weapon smuggling happening,
00:24:52.320 gun crime from organized criminal groups. And I think Pierre Paliyev spoke about this topic
00:24:59.600 earlier today, discussing a few of those thoughts and ideas. So we might be able to circle back to that
00:25:05.920 topic later on.
00:25:06.800 Yeah, Galtaka suggested one way they might be framing this as optional, because again,
00:25:12.160 we still have zero details on what that even means. But he said, quote,
00:25:15.520 I don't believe it will be optional. Maybe they'll say, keep your firearms,
00:25:19.440 don't get paid for them, but you'll have to deactivate them, weld them shut, and therefore
00:25:23.600 make them useless. Not really optional. One thing I just wanted to touch on was Smith,
00:25:28.880 Alberta Premier Daniel Smith recently said, essentially, she's not going to let this happen
00:25:33.680 in the province. She's telling the provincial police forces, the municipal police forces,
00:25:37.760 they cannot participate in this. She said Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe is going down the same line.
00:25:43.440 So Alex, just wanted to touch you quickly, ask you quickly, if you think,
00:25:47.200 if the Liberals do proceed with this, do you think other provinces will follow suit and essentially
00:25:51.040 just say, no, we're not doing this, it's our jurisdiction, and people will be good?
00:25:57.120 I'm not really an expert on the jurisdictional divisions on the issue of gun control. I mean,
00:26:02.560 to some extent, when it comes to municipal policing, you know, there's a third level of
00:26:06.480 government involved. I think that, you know, I hate to like bring this back to Charlie Kirk,
00:26:11.360 but I guess it's just, you know, top of mind right now. The thing I find interesting about this
00:26:16.240 news that we have about the voluntary buyback program with regards to the context of the
00:26:21.280 Charlie Kirk thing is I had people call me yesterday who are not even political people
00:26:26.240 to talk to me about the Charlie Kirk thing. I was surprised that they even knew who Charlie Kirk was.
00:26:30.080 And I heard from many people, including actually some folks who are political and on the right,
00:26:35.920 who said, you know, this is one of these weird stories where it actually kind of makes me glad
00:26:40.160 I'm in Canada versus the United States. And so I imagine that at a time like this,
00:26:45.920 across the political spectrum, believe it or not, there's probably more openness to more gun control
00:26:52.000 in Canada than you could probably have at any other time in recent history. But nobody has any
00:26:56.960 confidence that the liberals can do this effectively. I mean, that's the issue. This
00:27:00.560 is the party that has a gun buyback program that they spent billions of dollars on and they haven't
00:27:04.240 confiscated a single gun. This is the party that has a dental program that provides no dental care.
00:27:09.360 This is the government that provides a school food program that hasn't produced a single ham sandwich.
00:27:14.800 So even if people were in support of the principle of, you know, reducing gun violence, I mean,
00:27:20.720 that's a great goal. I think we all want to pursue that. Nobody has any confidence that this
00:27:24.400 government can pull it off. Yeah, Alexander. I understand the reaction from an emotional
00:27:29.520 perspective, but realistically, it would do nothing because as we know, every single jurisdiction,
00:27:34.800 when they're reporting their crime statistics, we're talking about the 90th percentile of guns used
00:27:38.720 in these crimes are illegally smuggled. So banning legally, legally purchased firearms like
00:27:44.240 bolt action rifles aren't going to do anything. Well, of course, they're smuggling them in.
00:27:48.320 And the vast majority of gun crimes are committed with guns that are not legally owned.
00:27:52.240 That's what I'm saying. So if you really wanted to reduce gun crime,
00:27:54.720 I think the smartest and easiest thing you could do is just increase mandatory minimums for owning
00:27:59.680 an illegal gun. Maybe, but we could, again, be in this can of worms all day long. Instead,
00:28:09.200 let's shift to a different Alberta story, which Walid actually covered, not me. It might surprise you.
00:28:15.680 But yeah, this is regarding the insurance rate caps. So what was going on there, Walid?
00:28:19.760 Future reference, Isaac, because I'm looking at Alberta as a future home. I have a flag
00:28:27.600 draped behind me. So I definitely will be covering more Alberta issues going forward
00:28:32.080 with or without your engagement there.
00:28:34.240 We'd welcome you with open arms, Walid.
00:28:37.200 Thank you. Thank you. You guys have made a fantastic province of yourselves.
00:28:40.800 But on the issue, I talked about the care first model and pending model that it's coming soon
00:28:50.800 and the potential reforms and consequences around their new system. I spoke to a Calgary area lawyer,
00:28:57.440 Stephen. I can't get his last name perfect, but it was Francophone. He and I spoke. I wanted to get a
00:29:03.520 consumer angle, industry angle to this story. The industry, almost by unanimous consent,
00:29:10.800 is in favor of the government removing the cap on interest rate hikes, essentially.
00:29:17.760 Or, yeah, the hike of, I believe it's 5% annually for the general, and then 2.5% for natural disasters
00:29:30.400 and other related elements. So right now, the insurance rate rate is capped. The increase is
00:29:37.840 capped at 7.5% per year for 15% after two years. That's what the government has put in place. Now,
00:29:45.040 if that cap were to be removed, lawyers like Stephen and many other consumers argue that the industry,
00:29:52.480 the insurance industry that is, would go above and beyond in overcharging consumers in Alberta.
00:29:58.480 And of course, there's another consequence to this, that with the care-first model,
00:30:04.080 that you would have a situation where courts or at least consumers would no longer be able to go to
00:30:09.600 courts to sue and would instead be forced to use an industry-funded mechanism to get to claims and
00:30:17.440 compensation apparently much faster. But there's always ethical doubts when you're dealing with a
00:30:23.120 system of refereeing that is funded by the participants themselves, which in this case includes the
00:30:29.040 insurance industry. So a lot of ethical questions around why and how this reform and what kind of
00:30:35.600 consequences it can bring about. I think consumers for the most part would be happier if Daniel Smith's
00:30:42.160 government kept the rate hike cap. And of course, for the most, I even saw public polling, the UCP
00:30:51.200 supporters in Alberta are among the most critical of the insurance industry. I think it's part of the
00:30:56.560 reason why is because they deal with it. They own properties, they drive cars, multiple cars. And of course,
00:31:02.560 that comes with a great expense for sure on the industry side for insurance. But I think
00:31:08.480 her supporters would be very disappointed seeing her go in a direction that would give the industry a
00:31:14.400 leg up over the consumers where they already have to pay. I mean, insurance is not a commodity. They
00:31:19.360 must pay for insurance. And as my interviewees said to me as well, if this was not a profitable
00:31:26.560 business model as it exists today, if the Insurance Bureau was actually honest about the fact that they
00:31:32.960 cannot make a profit out of the current cap, then they would be out of the province already. They
00:31:38.240 would leave for elsewhere. The insurance companies are still around, operating, still making fantastic
00:31:44.640 profits. Unfortunately, with that being said, they are still notoriously known to be a little bit
00:31:51.920 hawkish on consumers. I think last year alone, $3.1 million in Alberta was the total figure of
00:32:00.640 overcharges by insurance companies, at least the ones that were found and accounted for
00:32:06.240 in a report that I had read. So consumers are at odds with the insurance industry. And of course,
00:32:12.080 it's up to seeing the future will behold if the UCP lays down more on the side of consumers
00:32:19.760 or the side of industry. As always, there's a balance to it. But I think for now, consumers are
00:32:25.600 quite concerned with what the future has to hold. Yeah, well, if you're planning to move to Alberta,
00:32:30.320 you should know we are getting gouged, I think, on insurance rates, at least for cars. I think we
00:32:34.720 pay among the highest in the country. And this isn't provincial, but my property taxes too are
00:32:39.280 disgusting. And now they want to build all these bike lanes. I had this guy come up and he's like,
00:32:42.800 do you even bike? It's like, dude, I pay property taxes. Who are you to determine where those taxes go
00:32:47.440 to? Where do you think the city's getting the money by increasing my property taxes? If you know what I
00:32:51.120 paid in property taxes, you'd be disgusted. So I mean, again, I could go into an absolute flurry
00:32:57.200 or rage on insurance. But instead of doing that, I'll let you talk about Canadians who might have
00:33:03.360 been in a bit of a rage there, Alex, because we saw hundreds, if not like 1000, show up to this
00:33:09.120 protest outside of courthouse, I think. Yeah, what was going on there, Alex? Yeah, so this was outside of
00:33:14.880 the Robert S.K. Welch courthouse in St. Catharines, Ontario, actually looks like a pretty nice little
00:33:21.520 town, based off of the footage that we have from our friend, friend of the show, Kareem Assad.
00:33:27.520 And tons of people showed up. I said it was hundreds. Some people estimate that it may have
00:33:32.000 even been more than hundreds. They were protesting. A lot of them were there under the assumption that
00:33:37.440 it was a bail hearing for a gentleman named Daniel Senecal, or as he likes to go by Danny Senecal,
00:33:44.640 apparently. There's some rumors going around that this individual identifies as a woman,
00:33:51.040 presumably with a penis. I know that doesn't make sense, but whatever, I'm just the reporter. 0.99
00:33:56.640 To some, it makes sense, Alex. Yeah. Can we actually just run that clip quick before we get...
00:34:02.000 Yeah, sure. Go ahead.
00:34:02.800 Can we just run that clip?
00:34:14.640 Just one thing I wanted to say quick, Alex. While that clip was running, I just looked up the
00:34:36.160 population of St. Catharines, 140,000, so a pretty small town or whatever it is.
00:34:42.640 For that many people to show up, certainly some people came even maybe from out of town. Yeah.
00:34:48.640 Willie, you're making an expression like you know something about St. Catharines that we should know
00:34:52.880 about. I mean, just in defense of our viewers from St. Catharines in Ontario, I mean,
00:34:57.920 you know, whether it's a city or a town, I think it's a beautiful town. Just what surprises me from the
00:35:03.040 video was the fact that I'm looking at the proportion of people there. So I think the
00:35:06.800 majority of people are actually from the local community. I'm also interested about the demographics
00:35:10.880 there. It looks like a lot of older folks with some youth. So there's a mix of age there for sure.
00:35:16.000 So that's, I think, a very important part because, you know, we heard from Pierre Pauli
00:35:20.160 have talked about jail, not bail. I'll let Alex start the conversation here for this story. But
00:35:24.320 I know that the more people showing up for this kind of protest event, the more you understand just how
00:35:31.040 chronic the failure of the justice system is these days. So but St. Catharines is a beautiful
00:35:36.080 town or you could say a small city. I think it has its own city hall and its own mayor. So I think
00:35:42.000 you can say it's a small city in Ontario. Yeah, it's an amazing turnout. I think that, you know,
00:35:48.080 I'm obviously not a mind reader. I don't know exactly what was in these people's hearts, but I think
00:35:51.440 that most of them were there because they are fed up with our criminal justice system. Just a little bit
00:35:57.200 more background, this individual who was having their courtroom appearance. And I attended the
00:36:00.800 appearance remotely. He was previously charged with sexual assault offenses back in 2021, I believe,
00:36:09.600 is his first offense. The details of that are that case are covered by a publication ban to protect
00:36:14.960 the identity of the victim. He was let out early and also added to the registered sex offender list,
00:36:21.760 which in Canada is not on public record. So I don't really understand why we have this list,
00:36:28.080 other than to perhaps help police more closely monitor individuals who are higher risk to the
00:36:32.400 public. I personally think that, you know, maybe we should have some sunshine law reforms and that
00:36:36.240 those lists should be public so that people have a better capability of protecting themselves and their
00:36:41.520 family from potential predators. In any case, this was not a bail hearing. It was what they call
00:36:47.520 a remand video conferencing appearance. I don't believe he actually has had a formal
00:36:54.160 bail hearing. I think that we'll be getting close to something approximating a formal bail hearing,
00:36:59.360 probably in November. The wheels of justice grind slowly. In any case, Senecal is still in custody, 0.71
00:37:04.800 but there is a lot of rumors going around that he wants to be put into a female prison, which just 0.71
00:37:10.640 stokes more outrage. I should also add, of course, you know, I don't want to get too detailed into the
00:37:16.560 crime that he committed most recently. But the allegation is, is that he violently assaulted a
00:37:21.040 child. And so I think it's really, really amazing and great that so many people showed up in defense
00:37:27.120 of that child, because as we all know, children are not really capable of defending themselves.
00:37:31.680 So that's where, you know, good law abiding citizens who care about the vulnerable come out and
00:37:38.160 do their best to affect change. And I should also know that in Canada, we do not have elected judges
00:37:42.800 and our lawmakers have only spent 20 days in the House of Commons this year. So when people want to
00:37:48.240 affect change, really protest is their only option at this point. So I'm really glad that they were
00:37:51.920 there. And I think it's a good thing. Yeah. And Alex, obviously, we know Conservative
00:37:56.880 leader Pierre Pelleve has said numerous times, I think that biological women should be in women's 0.98
00:38:02.560 prisons and biological men should be in men's prisons. But if I recall correctly, Alex, it was actually you 0.96
00:38:07.440 who asked Carney about his thoughts on that. And just remind me again, what he had to say there, Alex?
00:38:13.680 Well, he said that there were two biological sexes. And he, I think correctly, to some extent, 0.97
00:38:19.680 he drew a distinction between gender and sex. But I asked if there are two biological sexes,
00:38:24.560 do you believe that biological women are entitled to their own spaces, including prisons? And he said,
00:38:29.120 as a general objective, yes. Unfortunately, we've seen zero movement on whether or not those reforms
00:38:35.200 are going to take place. Yeah, as a general objective, yes, except that's not how the law
00:38:39.680 is in Canada. And I haven't changed it. So really, how do you really feel? Because if you were passionate
00:38:43.840 about this, I'm sure it would be changed. Yeah, I mean, I don't know what else to say about that.
00:38:52.800 It's a great, like you said, Alex, that was a great point there that the House of Commons has sat for
00:38:57.280 20 days. And obviously, we can't change the laws. I mean, we have so many examples of laws people are
00:39:02.240 calling to be changed. Alex's Canada laws, all types of voting laws, all types of laws that affect
00:39:07.120 us nationwide, but it can't be done if Parliament isn't sitting. So we'll have to see what happens
00:39:13.440 when the House of Commons resumes here very, very briefly, or very shortly, sorry, not briefly.
00:39:18.400 But anyways, I'm Isaac Lamoure. I'd like to thank my colleagues, Alex Zoltan and Waleed Tam Tam
00:39:22.400 for today's show. And remember, everything you heard today was off the record.
00:39:25.360 As you mentioned, sorry, Waleed, you go just quickly here, you mentioned the registered sex
00:39:35.680 offenders lists. And I'm just wondering whether you know this, you may not. But in other countries
00:39:40.000 that have these lists, like the US, for example, do I don't, I think it'd be a bit too obtrusive
00:39:45.520 if they had the people's addresses on there, because they might be getting attacked. But like,
00:39:49.200 if a registered sex offender moved into your neighborhood and was your next door neighbor,
00:39:52.160 like, would they have to, by law, tell you? Is that a thing?
00:39:57.680 It varies depending on where you are. I don't think that by law, there's anywhere where they
00:40:02.480 would have to give you a public notice, to the best of my knowledge. But there are registered
00:40:06.400 sex offenders lists where, you know, they will post the person's address. And I know that because
00:40:11.280 there's a website called Inmates Connects Canada, where different Canadian prisoners, you know,
00:40:17.360 that you can find like pen pals and stuff. And one of them is in the States. And the only way I was
00:40:21.520 able to find any information on their crimes was because they were on the registered sex offender
00:40:25.120 list and it lists their address. Yeah, yeah, yeah. So I was just curious, because you know,
00:40:31.440 you never know a sex offender moves onto your block, it'd be nice to know if you have children,
00:40:34.800 right? Like realistically? Yeah, of course, especially in Canada, when we can't lock them
00:40:40.000 up. I mean, walking around, right? I mean, it's the worst of both worlds. I mean, I totally, I get the
00:40:46.560 idea behind wanting to have a legal system that believes that people are, have issues that are
00:40:50.720 remediable. But if you're going to have that, then you should also, you know, balance public safety by
00:40:57.120 telling society that you're releasing a bunch of prisoners into their, into their neighborhoods.
00:41:03.200 Yeah, the only things I see around here are, hey, sorry, we're releasing this,
00:41:07.760 this murderer, this very dangerous individual, we can't keep them in prison, we're releasing them,
00:41:11.840 this person is a public danger, and they're being released. I mean, you see it so often.