Juno News - September 13, 2025


Charlie Kirk assassinated at college debate


Episode Stats

Length

41 minutes

Words per Minute

182.0564

Word Count

7,550

Sentence Count

348

Misogynist Sentences

2

Hate Speech Sentences

6


Summary


Transcript

00:00:00.480 We are recording today on Thursday, September 11th, 2025.
00:00:06.400 So obviously the big news yesterday was about Charlie Kirk.
00:00:09.520 I'm sure we all have lots to talk about with regards to that story,
00:00:12.780 but it is also the anniversary of September 11th.
00:00:15.280 So I guess I would just ask, do you guys remember where you were on September 11th, 2001?
00:00:20.940 I do. I was at my, I was a child, young child,
00:00:24.920 and I was at my babysitter, Renine, who I called Auntie Renine,
00:00:28.060 but certainly no relation.
00:00:30.040 She was just my best friend's mom who babysat me,
00:00:33.820 and we used to play hockey together, me and that guy.
00:00:36.040 We didn't even play on a team together.
00:00:37.200 We just played street hockey all day when I was at her house.
00:00:42.600 I think I was somewhere in the kind of in the embryo process.
00:00:47.860 I was born in 2002, so I don't have much memory of the event myself,
00:00:51.780 but certainly the post-2001 world is in the world I've only ever known.
00:00:57.440 So definitely I take 9-11 with a very keen interest depending on exactly what we're discussing.
00:01:06.080 The event themselves, the precursor, and of course the post-geopolitical reality
00:01:11.820 with how we got engaged in the Middle East and how air travel and just governments have really grown
00:01:19.580 and everything's changed since that point, that specific point in time.
00:01:23.300 It's a really consequential event for sure.
00:01:26.940 Do you remember where you were when you first learned about 9-11?
00:01:30.640 I think, to be fair with me, I may have heard of 9-11 multiple times throughout my childhood
00:01:35.960 without giving it much attention, but when I was growing up,
00:01:39.920 I actually would frequent New York actually because I had a family living there
00:01:43.280 and I spent some time living there myself as well.
00:01:45.420 So I think when I spent some time in New York as a child around 2008, 2009,
00:01:49.400 I really grasped the reality and grasped the history.
00:01:52.860 When I would sit down at home and I would just watch ABC News Live commercial break
00:01:59.600 and I would see all these commercials about law firms looking for former 9-11 survivors
00:02:05.200 or firefighters that were there that day that have cancer, lung cancer, other damages,
00:02:12.980 and of course trying to get something out of that, I think it's something along the lines of a memorial fund
00:02:18.240 that is out there provided by the government for these victims.
00:02:22.120 So I could understand what a world after 9-11 for a New Yorker's event.
00:02:26.860 Obviously, there were people that had lost family members
00:02:29.740 and people that had experienced some very traumatic events on that day.
00:02:34.900 But again, they're still living with the consequences in terms of families being apart,
00:02:40.700 people dealing with health consequences.
00:02:42.660 I mean, just all the smoke, all the debris, that itself had a massive effect on public health.
00:02:50.260 So when you're in New York, especially during that time, it's only a few years after I was around 2009,
00:02:56.400 so you definitely embrace the reality, the fact, and the history there.
00:03:01.500 I've also visited the memorial multiple times.
00:03:04.000 It's very beautiful, actually, the Freedom Tower and everything else, and the museum.
00:03:08.620 It's a very important part of history to understand, for sure,
00:03:11.200 but not without its controversy and its fair share of conspiracy as well.
00:03:15.520 Yeah, do you guys think we'll be around the campfire in 15 years
00:03:19.320 talking about where we were for the Charlie Kirk assassination, similarly?
00:03:23.520 Anyways, that'll be our first story we'll be discussing today.
00:03:27.040 My name's Isaac Lamour.
00:03:27.900 I'm here with my colleagues, Alex Zoltan and Waleed Tam Tam.
00:03:30.480 Let's hop right into things.
00:03:36.200 Yeah, so obviously, I don't know about you guys, but still reeling a bit from the news yesterday.
00:03:42.460 As you mentioned, Alex, we are recording this on Thursday,
00:03:44.620 so just note that anything we say today is subject to change based on whenever we might end up publishing this.
00:03:50.620 But obviously, Charlie Kirk was brutally assassinated yesterday while doing one of his famous prove-me-wrong campus debates
00:04:02.260 out of nowhere there, and that kind of, similarly to 9-11, which you were just discussing,
00:04:07.800 ground the world to a halt, at least from a media perspective.
00:04:11.680 I don't know if it was like that for normal people, as it would have been with 9-11.
00:04:16.300 But I mean, just so much to talk about with this story and the few details we know.
00:04:22.640 I mean, for example, the FBI, they had someone in custody, but now they don't.
00:04:27.780 And in fact, the FBI is offering a $100,000 USD reward to anyone who gives them any information
00:04:35.320 that could lead to the, not any information, but information that leads to the identification
00:04:40.580 or apprehension of the suspect.
00:04:42.580 So $100,000, I mean, and the fact that this person got away is just unbelievable, really.
00:04:48.600 I mean, we don't know the exact details of the security that Kirk might have had at his events.
00:04:53.320 It's not like there was 100 FBI members there, and this guy just escaped.
00:04:56.740 But as far as we know right now, he was like 200 feet, I think, away on a roof and shot him
00:05:03.320 with some sort of sniper.
00:05:05.180 So obviously, this is at least in some fashion a trained shooter, because I don't think a
00:05:11.280 random person off the street could hit someone in the neck from 200 feet or yards away with
00:05:17.480 a sniper, but I'm no gun expert.
00:05:19.760 And then we're also seeing reports that from legitimate sources, that being Stephen Crowder,
00:05:27.240 I think he got an email saying that there were some sort of transgender and anti-fascist
00:05:31.760 etchings on the bullets that they found, because they did recover the gun and some sort of spare
00:05:37.020 cartridges.
00:05:38.400 So, I mean, I could go on and on, but I mean, this is obviously terrible.
00:05:41.860 Charlie Kirk was a huge proponent of the conservative movement, not just in America, but all around
00:05:48.420 the world, especially in Canada, in North America.
00:05:50.660 I mean, every conservative spokesperson I know probably saw Kirk as a role model, myself
00:05:55.440 included, and I still see him in that way.
00:05:58.020 And we know he had a wife and two young children, three and one years old, who are left behind.
00:06:04.080 I mean, I don't even know what to ask you guys.
00:06:06.220 What are your, I guess, immediate reactions?
00:06:09.940 Because we're just still reacting to this right now.
00:06:13.300 Like, what have you guys kind of been going through with this Kirk assassination?
00:06:18.420 Yeah, I mean, it's horrific.
00:06:28.240 There's really not much more to say than that.
00:06:32.220 I thought I'd be through processing it already, because we just have such a quick news cycle
00:06:38.320 these days, but I think I'm still kind of like in a state of shock a little bit, which is strange
00:06:46.240 because, you know, shootings are so common, you know, not just in the United States, but
00:06:50.880 everywhere.
00:06:52.600 Political assassinations are less common, but, you know, even I just learned recently from
00:06:57.280 this story, I guess, by extension of this story, there was a political assassination in
00:07:00.620 Minnesota, just like a few months ago, which for some reason never came across my newsfeed.
00:07:05.440 I think a lot of people are just discovering that now.
00:07:10.560 Yeah.
00:07:10.920 Another thing, I don't know about you guys, but obviously I saw the video and I, I mean,
00:07:15.060 I say I wish I hadn't, but it was almost inevitable.
00:07:17.560 It was everywhere and people are saying, stop sharing the video just out of respect.
00:07:20.600 But it was, it was obviously terrible to see.
00:07:23.360 Yeah, Waleed, were you kind of in the same spot where you're, you're kind of world just
00:07:27.940 ground to a halt there?
00:07:29.680 Absolutely.
00:07:30.320 I mean, I mean, the reason why you had awkward silence for a moment with Alex and I seeing
00:07:34.700 who would answer the question first was frankly, I think for all of us as journalists, it's
00:07:38.820 a shocking moment, not just because of the graphic and the tragic nature of it, but just
00:07:43.780 how, I guess you could say relatable that environment is for us growing up.
00:07:47.800 I guess all of us have had some sort of a political discourse in our life on college
00:07:53.360 campuses or off college campuses, you know, talking about the culture war, talking about
00:07:58.280 the things that, you know, Kirk would often talk about on his videos, at his live events.
00:08:02.760 So, you know, that, that environment for us is not an environment that it is hard to imagine.
00:08:07.200 You know, this isn't some foreign land with a very different concept.
00:08:10.440 This is what we've gone through growing up.
00:08:13.140 This is how we got to our positions as journalists today, as we engage in civil discourse.
00:08:17.800 We engage with asking questions and answering questions and debating topics, those that
00:08:22.740 we are very passionate about, and those that just happen to be on the news.
00:08:26.180 We've been part of the kind of, you could say, the TPUSA culture without, you know, being
00:08:31.720 involved directly with that organization or even in the discourse in the U.S., but just
00:08:36.820 the culture of left, right students, just that environment, which I think is very, very
00:08:44.420 important and something that I think Kirk brought a lot of value to because, you know, a lot
00:08:48.780 of people, and I think this is something that's even happened to him in videos before, would
00:08:52.520 kind of ask him, you know, what do you actually do?
00:08:54.700 I mean, what is, what do you make, how do you make a living?
00:08:57.140 You know, what is your job?
00:08:58.760 And Kirk would reply sometimes along the lines of, you know, I come here, I engage on campus,
00:09:03.060 I engage in civil, respectful discourse on the issues that matter the most to me and
00:09:08.200 to our generation, and, you know, obviously talking about political issues and societal
00:09:12.600 issues and, you know, religion and economics as well.
00:09:17.180 You know, I think for a lot of us, we can overlook those issues in our day-to-day life,
00:09:21.900 and I think with Kirk and, you know, his group and his students that he would lead throughout
00:09:26.580 these sessions for years have brought kind of a heightened sense of awareness, a lot
00:09:33.080 of people behind the corner of engaging these topics rather than just thinking about them
00:09:38.520 passively and being outspoken, talking about them, not just holding these feelings and thoughts
00:09:43.400 to yourself.
00:09:44.380 So again, when you see this tragic event to happen to this individual, obviously, you know,
00:09:48.840 there's tragedies happening every day, but you're talking about the relationship that
00:09:52.300 we have with that individual and with his purpose, how much we, you know, either find
00:09:58.400 inspiration from or we seek guidance from that kind of content, you know, when you're thinking
00:10:03.280 about what I want to write about, what I want to talk about, you know, you're probably on
00:10:07.060 social media because that's the best place to fish for new ideas and understand what the
00:10:11.860 discourse of the day is.
00:10:13.720 And, you know, Kirk is, I think there's not a day where I spend more than 20 minutes on
00:10:17.780 Instagram where I don't see a reel with some background music and subtitles of him
00:10:22.280 talking back and forth with a student.
00:10:24.340 It's just, it's been so popular and so much part of a pop culture for sure.
00:10:28.540 I think that's like, sorry, Isaac, I'm going to jump in here.
00:10:31.500 I think it's one of the things that makes this story so troubling and difficult to digest
00:10:35.240 is that if you go back in time to when Charlie Kirk first started coming across people's
00:10:40.460 Instagram reels, that coincided with a time when left-wing politics really just completely
00:10:45.980 took over university campuses.
00:10:47.540 And, and so people were really silenced.
00:10:50.760 And so he kind of became a voice for not only like a silent majority, but a silenced majority
00:10:57.640 where he was, he was brave enough to say a lot of things that people weren't brave enough
00:11:01.540 to say because, you know, they were, they wanted to pass their courses, frankly, and appease
00:11:07.060 their, their leftist university professors.
00:11:09.920 And so I think that's just one of the things that makes this really troubling, difficult to
00:11:13.080 digest.
00:11:13.560 Yeah.
00:11:14.280 And speaking on that from a Canadian angle, Alex, over the last week or so, I think a
00:11:18.260 poll came out showing that the majority of students on Canadian campuses are scared to
00:11:22.900 share their true beliefs.
00:11:23.980 So, I mean, a Charlie Kirk type person in Canada, for example, would be more needed now than ever.
00:11:30.160 But I, obviously we talked about the horrible video, but I also saw a great one yesterday,
00:11:35.740 which was a montage of his clips during the presidential election there and, and Kamala
00:11:42.660 Harris supporters were approaching him and he would just challenge them and say, why would,
00:11:47.120 why do you want to vote for Kamala?
00:11:48.140 For which they had, as you can imagine, little, little, little to say, but they'd debate back
00:11:53.040 and forth.
00:11:53.440 He'd present the evidence and, and he'd do what he was so good at doing.
00:11:56.320 And then in the end, he'd ask them, who are you voting for now?
00:11:57.920 And they would say, Trump, Trump.
00:11:59.900 And, and, and, and, you know, it just, he, he, he, he, he served as such a strong person
00:12:06.220 for the conservative movement.
00:12:07.200 And I, I did want to ask you guys about that.
00:12:09.180 Obviously we, we perhaps no one bigger for the conservative movement in the, in the U S,
00:12:14.900 especially on the college campuses than Charlie Kirk and how, how big he is, how worldly he
00:12:18.800 is, but I'm just curious.
00:12:20.500 And I wanted to ask if you think that just, I was looking for silver linings this morning
00:12:25.540 and this one came into my mind.
00:12:26.640 For example, Alex, do you think that he could even be bigger than he was after his life
00:12:30.860 now?
00:12:31.220 For example, personally, I'm just thinking about this and how much of an inspiration he
00:12:34.740 serves to me to, to move the conservative movement forward in Canada.
00:12:37.760 And I know that there are millions like me, or I'm assuming there are millions like me
00:12:41.800 across the world who are going to be inspired for years to come from, from Kirk and what
00:12:45.880 he accomplished.
00:12:47.640 Well, yeah, people are typically immortalized when they die young, um, high profile people.
00:12:52.480 And so in a sense, you know, whoever did this, um, whatever individual or
00:12:56.620 persons that did this, uh, has kind of made him a bit of a martyr for the free speech
00:13:01.240 movement.
00:13:02.160 Um, I think that's something that his family can take some solace in because I think if
00:13:06.060 there's anything worth giving your life over, it's the right to speak freely and for your
00:13:11.000 children to speak freely.
00:13:11.920 So I think that's really brave and, uh, yeah, but I just hope that the, the reaction to this
00:13:18.840 does not create an environment in which people feel afraid to speak because, um, you know,
00:13:25.020 it's really important, uh, not just for political discourse, but also for each individual's mental
00:13:30.800 health to, to speak freely and say what's on their mind.
00:13:33.960 Um, so, um, I, I also would denounce like any calls to, for violence in response to this.
00:13:41.760 I don't think that that's appropriate either, especially when we don't know, um, as of Thursday,
00:13:45.940 September 11th, 2025, who the shooter is, I think that'd be very presumptive and preemptive
00:13:51.240 people.
00:13:52.260 Um, but I also, uh, I'll reserve judgment because anger is a very predictable initial step in the
00:13:58.000 grieving process and have people digest traumatic events.
00:14:02.080 So, and Waleed, just looking at right-wing versus left-wing discourse and the kind of
00:14:08.740 political battle going on, not only in the States, but worldwide, uh, do you, do you think
00:14:12.800 that this assassination will change anything in, in how that goes forward, uh, on either
00:14:18.420 side?
00:14:20.840 Yeah, for sure.
00:14:21.800 I mean, I think that there will be a part of, let's say the more responsible, mature
00:14:26.520 left, should there be a growth in that demographic that, let's just be honest, some people have
00:14:32.860 to be a bit more reserved with their commentary.
00:14:35.300 There might be kind of recent, resensible process of people gaining their humanity back, especially
00:14:42.240 those that have opted to demonize those with different views.
00:14:46.140 I guess, I mean, when you hear that language of Nazis and, and, and, you know, all kinds of
00:14:50.800 other titles of bigotry, I think there's going to be a lot more room to etch that kind of
00:14:56.060 rhetoric out of the mainstream discourse, at least I think for the right wing on the side,
00:15:01.560 which Kirk represented for the most part, I think there will be both good and bad.
00:15:07.540 I mean, like Alex mentioned, this is also my concern as well as, will there be a chilling
00:15:12.700 effect for people?
00:15:13.660 I don't think the average student as much, but for, let's say the Kirk's counterparts,
00:15:18.720 you know, other people that would sit down, Michael Knowles, you know, all those other
00:15:24.940 talking heads that have, you know, common, you know, table side, because one of the things
00:15:33.380 I liked about, I loved actually, and I still love about these kinds of groups, you know,
00:15:38.480 TPSA and other conservative societies is that they engaging with people on the street in public
00:15:45.720 parks, or in, you know, college campuses, and that's the, the physical manifestation of the
00:15:52.100 public forum.
00:15:53.220 That's, you know, where someone walking by that has no interest in the issue, and someone
00:15:57.320 that happens to finish their class that have prepared the, you know, the perfect gotcha question,
00:16:03.260 and they're all ready to fire on and represent their side, and you never know how it actually
00:16:07.780 comes off when they hit the mic.
00:16:09.060 So, I mean, I don't want to lose that environment, and definitely we lost, you know, perhaps one
00:16:15.500 of the pioneers of this political environment, the political campus sandbox.
00:16:21.340 I think we lost one of those pioneers yesterday, and that's obviously very sad, but I do believe
00:16:27.000 there'll be a renewed sense of appreciation, because it's part of human nature to only appreciate
00:16:31.920 or feel grateful for something when it's removed, and this applies to people as well.
00:16:36.380 So, I think that a lot of, a lot of folks will definitely be much more appreciative of
00:16:41.040 the work that is done by college groups, student groups that, you know, can push forward their
00:16:47.460 narratives, agendas, causes, and passions through public civil discourse.
00:16:52.800 It's a very important lesson for us, and definitely looking forward to seeing how we can all play
00:16:57.780 a part of that, you know, as journalists, you know, engaging those circles and hearing what
00:17:02.180 students and folks on the street have to say, because their voices matter, and conversations
00:17:06.960 are, I think, the best way to open up our differences and resolve them if possible.
00:17:12.640 Yeah, Kirk had a quote along those lines, and I'm paraphrasing because I don't remember it
00:17:16.160 perfectly, but he basically was saying, when you lose public discourse, what you get is violence,
00:17:20.580 so we certainly can't let this act of violence lead to losing public discourse, because that
00:17:26.640 would only lead to things getting worse. Not better, but we could sit on this all day,
00:17:33.100 probably talk for hours. I mean, there's just so much to discuss. But instead, let's talk
00:17:38.120 about guns in Canada, which are having a huge transformation, apparently, because Mark Carney
00:17:45.820 on Wednesday was doing a podcast in Edmonton amid the Liberal retreat with a popular Edmonton
00:17:53.120 podcaster there, and he called the gun ban voluntary, the Liberal gun confiscation program
00:17:57.640 he called voluntary, which, as far as I understand, was the first time that type of language had
00:18:02.820 ever been used, despite this gun ban, of course, being in effect for five years now. And then
00:18:07.980 I actually went downtown today, just outside of the Liberal retreat there, and I found Public
00:18:12.900 Safety Minister Gary Anandesongri on the street corner, went up to him, and I asked him about
00:18:17.440 that. So let's play that clip and see what he had to say.
00:18:19.960 Excuse me, Mr. Anandesongri, can you just clarify the comments Carney made yesterday about
00:18:24.120 the gun buyback program being voluntary? Are you changing the program?
00:18:28.460 Well, the program is going to be launched soon.
00:18:32.780 Is it going to be voluntary now?
00:18:34.980 It's always been voluntary.
00:18:37.720 How is that? Can you just clarify those comments? Is it possible? Because people are,
00:18:42.360 all the gun organizations I'm seeing are super confused. They're saying, is it voluntary all
00:18:45.540 of a sudden? Because from what I can tell, the CCFR, for example, they're all saying that
00:18:49.600 it's been mandatory.
00:18:51.780 Why don't you contact my office and we'll be able to...
00:18:54.860 You have no comments on that for today?
00:19:01.760 Yeah, sorry about the video recording there. I was just trying to get good audio, which I
00:19:07.140 did, which is important. But you might be able to have told how confused I was with his
00:19:11.700 response, which is why I said all I had to say was, how is that? Like, what do you mean
00:19:15.880 it's voluntary, man? For the last five years, we've been at the... Of course, this is a
00:19:20.240 mandatory thing. You're going to confiscate the guns or else, per the public laws, you're
00:19:27.640 going to jail for five years for possessing an illegal firearm. So I don't understand how
00:19:32.660 now they're calling it voluntary because that is a complete change of pace. But hey, Ananda
00:19:39.600 Sangri stood by Carney's comments there. Although in the past, Ananda Sangri has been called out
00:19:46.920 by actually former True North journalist Andrew Lawton, who's now a Conservative MP, because
00:19:51.980 he was debating him in the House of Commons and came to realize that Ananda Sangri did not
00:19:56.420 know basic things about his file, basic things about Canadian gun laws. So it could be that
00:20:01.520 he too is wrong. He said to reach out to his office there, which of course I did, called
00:20:05.720 them, emailed them, no response. So we might have to just wait and see how this develops
00:20:10.160 over the coming weeks. True North kind of breaking this. I mean, Alex, do you think there is a
00:20:16.580 world where this is actually voluntary? Or is this just some sort of liberal gaslighting?
00:20:21.900 Like, oh yeah, it's voluntary, but you're going to go to jail?
00:20:25.220 Well, if it was always voluntary, that might explain why they haven't confiscated any guns.
00:20:33.120 This program is, how old is this program? Doesn't it? Yeah, it's 20, it came from an order in council
00:20:37.740 in 2020. And eventually the list has now grown to over 2,500 firearms being on that banned list
00:20:43.720 and costs, which again, they haven't confiscated any guns, but they're saying costs are expected to
00:20:48.200 be around $2 billion. So a lot of money for, for no confiscation there. I remember there was a big
00:20:52.780 controversy with Bill Blair when he was the public safety minister, if my memory serves me correctly.
00:20:57.060 And he was kind of exploiting the, the tragedy that happened with the mass shooting in Nova Scotia
00:21:02.400 to push through this gun back gun buyback program is what they call it, but it's really a confiscation
00:21:07.560 program. Yeah. You can't really have a voluntary confiscation program. Isn't that just like a
00:21:12.680 paradox? Like that doesn't even make sense. Yeah. The, the executive director of the CCFR,
00:21:20.540 Tracy Wilson, she commented a bit on that. Um, but yeah, no, basically, uh, essentially she said,
00:21:25.820 quote, it's not a voluntary program or a buyback as the liberals in the media have happily called it.
00:21:30.880 It is a confiscation and threat of imprisonment. And then she said, Carney has the gall to call it
00:21:37.220 an opportunity for licensed law abiding firearms owners to turn over their legally purchased property.
00:21:42.080 I mean, and, uh, furthermore, I do want to go a bit deeper into Carney's comments there,
00:21:46.500 because he said, um, that this doesn't target assault rifles. He said this that are, sorry,
00:21:53.840 sorry. He said this exclusively targets assault rifles, which is of course not true. Uh, Rod,
00:21:58.660 Rod Giltaka, uh, the, the CEO of the, the Canadian coalition for firearms rights, he said, uh, this was
00:22:05.760 just a lie. He said, quote, there were no assault weapons banned since May 1st, 2020. Every one of these
00:22:12.980 firearms were for hunting or sports shooting. That's why they were legal in the first place.
00:22:17.220 Because I'll remind people, all of these guns were legally purchased by, by Canadians. Uh, and he
00:22:22.100 said, Giltaka did quote, the lies of these people are outrageous. So, I mean, yeah, we'll lead. Uh, I
00:22:28.360 mean, what's really to say, uh, do you, do you think that it could be voluntary? I mean, uh, are,
00:22:35.280 are they just blowing smoke here?
00:22:36.740 Well, you know, it reminds me of the time that Trudeau would speak into the media after COVID
00:22:43.740 and talking about, you know, and speaking specifically to the narrative behind the vaccine
00:22:48.780 mandates and the vaccine passports was, you know, no, we never actually forced people, you know, we
00:22:53.700 just locked them out of restaurants, bars, public spaces from being able to work. Uh, we've basically
00:23:01.920 taken out all of the purpose to their lives and all of the purpose to their passions. And we've
00:23:07.760 said to them that you can't really do much. Oh, and also we didn't allow them to leave the country in
00:23:13.120 any way possible. So it's, it's a really, it's a war of deception here. Um, so I, I don't think this
00:23:21.200 program is, is by any means, you know, optional. It's, that's absolutely the course of why the nature of
00:23:27.680 the laws applied on those specific firearms, but I definitely think this is kind of where they've
00:23:33.840 tried to, you know, like, let's say retract themselves in their approach by adopting a bit
00:23:40.400 more of a lenient rhetoric, because at the end of the day, they're not speaking to gun owners.
00:23:45.760 They're not even hearing much from gun owners, which is why they've gotten to such a, they could
00:23:50.720 say a tone deaf policy talking about, you know, banning specific firearms, which are often mostly
00:23:57.680 owned legally by well-trained, sophisticated, responsible gun owners that have caught through
00:24:03.680 the most sophisticated hula hoops to get those guns legally acquired. And they get their training
00:24:09.920 course completed all assigned by the RCMP while allowing the RCMP to engage their property, observe
00:24:18.560 how they store the weapons and how they operate. I mean, the fact of the matter is you're not going
00:24:23.280 to be able to deal with crime when you're dealing with law-abiding citizens directly and uniquely.
00:24:28.400 You're dealing with people that want to follow the law, not the people who won't. And that's
00:24:34.080 a very important part. So I definitely think if they're going to make any progress in the public
00:24:37.840 security file as it relates to firearms, which there should be definitely a concern for Canadians.
00:24:42.720 We've seen a rise of gun violence across the country, especially in the GTA area.
00:24:47.520 I think if that's going to change, it's going to come down to the weapon smuggling happening,
00:24:52.320 gun crime from organized criminal groups. And I think Pierre Paliyev spoke about this topic
00:24:59.600 earlier today, discussing a few of those thoughts and ideas. So we might be able to circle back to that
00:25:05.920 topic later on.
00:25:06.800 Yeah, Galtaka suggested one way they might be framing this as optional, because again,
00:25:12.160 we still have zero details on what that even means. But he said, quote,
00:25:15.520 I don't believe it will be optional. Maybe they'll say, keep your firearms,
00:25:19.440 don't get paid for them, but you'll have to deactivate them, weld them shut, and therefore
00:25:23.600 make them useless. Not really optional. One thing I just wanted to touch on was Smith,
00:25:28.880 Alberta Premier Daniel Smith recently said, essentially, she's not going to let this happen
00:25:33.680 in the province. She's telling the provincial police forces, the municipal police forces,
00:25:37.760 they cannot participate in this. She said Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe is going down the same line.
00:25:43.440 So Alex, just wanted to touch you quickly, ask you quickly, if you think,
00:25:47.200 if the Liberals do proceed with this, do you think other provinces will follow suit and essentially
00:25:51.040 just say, no, we're not doing this, it's our jurisdiction, and people will be good?
00:25:57.120 I'm not really an expert on the jurisdictional divisions on the issue of gun control. I mean,
00:26:02.560 to some extent, when it comes to municipal policing, you know, there's a third level of
00:26:06.480 government involved. I think that, you know, I hate to like bring this back to Charlie Kirk,
00:26:11.360 but I guess it's just, you know, top of mind right now. The thing I find interesting about this
00:26:16.240 news that we have about the voluntary buyback program with regards to the context of the
00:26:21.280 Charlie Kirk thing is I had people call me yesterday who are not even political people
00:26:26.240 to talk to me about the Charlie Kirk thing. I was surprised that they even knew who Charlie Kirk was.
00:26:30.080 And I heard from many people, including actually some folks who are political and on the right,
00:26:35.920 who said, you know, this is one of these weird stories where it actually kind of makes me glad
00:26:40.160 I'm in Canada versus the United States. And so I imagine that at a time like this,
00:26:45.920 across the political spectrum, believe it or not, there's probably more openness to more gun control
00:26:52.000 in Canada than you could probably have at any other time in recent history. But nobody has any
00:26:56.960 confidence that the liberals can do this effectively. I mean, that's the issue. This
00:27:00.560 is the party that has a gun buyback program that they spent billions of dollars on and they haven't
00:27:04.240 confiscated a single gun. This is the party that has a dental program that provides no dental care.
00:27:09.360 This is the government that provides a school food program that hasn't produced a single ham sandwich.
00:27:14.800 So even if people were in support of the principle of, you know, reducing gun violence, I mean,
00:27:20.720 that's a great goal. I think we all want to pursue that. Nobody has any confidence that this
00:27:24.400 government can pull it off. Yeah, Alexander. I understand the reaction from an emotional
00:27:29.520 perspective, but realistically, it would do nothing because as we know, every single jurisdiction,
00:27:34.800 when they're reporting their crime statistics, we're talking about the 90th percentile of guns used
00:27:38.720 in these crimes are illegally smuggled. So banning legally, legally purchased firearms like
00:27:44.240 bolt action rifles aren't going to do anything. Well, of course, they're smuggling them in.
00:27:48.320 And the vast majority of gun crimes are committed with guns that are not legally owned.
00:27:52.240 That's what I'm saying. So if you really wanted to reduce gun crime,
00:27:54.720 I think the smartest and easiest thing you could do is just increase mandatory minimums for owning
00:27:59.680 an illegal gun. Maybe, but we could, again, be in this can of worms all day long. Instead,
00:28:09.200 let's shift to a different Alberta story, which Walid actually covered, not me. It might surprise you.
00:28:15.680 But yeah, this is regarding the insurance rate caps. So what was going on there, Walid?
00:28:19.760 Future reference, Isaac, because I'm looking at Alberta as a future home. I have a flag
00:28:27.600 draped behind me. So I definitely will be covering more Alberta issues going forward
00:28:32.080 with or without your engagement there.
00:28:34.240 We'd welcome you with open arms, Walid.
00:28:37.200 Thank you. Thank you. You guys have made a fantastic province of yourselves.
00:28:40.800 But on the issue, I talked about the care first model and pending model that it's coming soon
00:28:50.800 and the potential reforms and consequences around their new system. I spoke to a Calgary area lawyer,
00:28:57.440 Stephen. I can't get his last name perfect, but it was Francophone. He and I spoke. I wanted to get a
00:29:03.520 consumer angle, industry angle to this story. The industry, almost by unanimous consent,
00:29:10.800 is in favor of the government removing the cap on interest rate hikes, essentially.
00:29:17.760 Or, yeah, the hike of, I believe it's 5% annually for the general, and then 2.5% for natural disasters
00:29:30.400 and other related elements. So right now, the insurance rate rate is capped. The increase is
00:29:37.840 capped at 7.5% per year for 15% after two years. That's what the government has put in place. Now,
00:29:45.040 if that cap were to be removed, lawyers like Stephen and many other consumers argue that the industry,
00:29:52.480 the insurance industry that is, would go above and beyond in overcharging consumers in Alberta.
00:29:58.480 And of course, there's another consequence to this, that with the care-first model,
00:30:04.080 that you would have a situation where courts or at least consumers would no longer be able to go to
00:30:09.600 courts to sue and would instead be forced to use an industry-funded mechanism to get to claims and
00:30:17.440 compensation apparently much faster. But there's always ethical doubts when you're dealing with a
00:30:23.120 system of refereeing that is funded by the participants themselves, which in this case includes the
00:30:29.040 insurance industry. So a lot of ethical questions around why and how this reform and what kind of
00:30:35.600 consequences it can bring about. I think consumers for the most part would be happier if Daniel Smith's
00:30:42.160 government kept the rate hike cap. And of course, for the most, I even saw public polling, the UCP
00:30:51.200 supporters in Alberta are among the most critical of the insurance industry. I think it's part of the
00:30:56.560 reason why is because they deal with it. They own properties, they drive cars, multiple cars. And of course,
00:31:02.560 that comes with a great expense for sure on the industry side for insurance. But I think
00:31:08.480 her supporters would be very disappointed seeing her go in a direction that would give the industry a
00:31:14.400 leg up over the consumers where they already have to pay. I mean, insurance is not a commodity. They
00:31:19.360 must pay for insurance. And as my interviewees said to me as well, if this was not a profitable
00:31:26.560 business model as it exists today, if the Insurance Bureau was actually honest about the fact that they
00:31:32.960 cannot make a profit out of the current cap, then they would be out of the province already. They
00:31:38.240 would leave for elsewhere. The insurance companies are still around, operating, still making fantastic
00:31:44.640 profits. Unfortunately, with that being said, they are still notoriously known to be a little bit
00:31:51.920 hawkish on consumers. I think last year alone, $3.1 million in Alberta was the total figure of
00:32:00.640 overcharges by insurance companies, at least the ones that were found and accounted for
00:32:06.240 in a report that I had read. So consumers are at odds with the insurance industry. And of course,
00:32:12.080 it's up to seeing the future will behold if the UCP lays down more on the side of consumers
00:32:19.760 or the side of industry. As always, there's a balance to it. But I think for now, consumers are
00:32:25.600 quite concerned with what the future has to hold. Yeah, well, if you're planning to move to Alberta,
00:32:30.320 you should know we are getting gouged, I think, on insurance rates, at least for cars. I think we
00:32:34.720 pay among the highest in the country. And this isn't provincial, but my property taxes too are
00:32:39.280 disgusting. And now they want to build all these bike lanes. I had this guy come up and he's like,
00:32:42.800 do you even bike? It's like, dude, I pay property taxes. Who are you to determine where those taxes go
00:32:47.440 to? Where do you think the city's getting the money by increasing my property taxes? If you know what I
00:32:51.120 paid in property taxes, you'd be disgusted. So I mean, again, I could go into an absolute flurry
00:32:57.200 or rage on insurance. But instead of doing that, I'll let you talk about Canadians who might have
00:33:03.360 been in a bit of a rage there, Alex, because we saw hundreds, if not like 1000, show up to this
00:33:09.120 protest outside of courthouse, I think. Yeah, what was going on there, Alex? Yeah, so this was outside of
00:33:14.880 the Robert S.K. Welch courthouse in St. Catharines, Ontario, actually looks like a pretty nice little
00:33:21.520 town, based off of the footage that we have from our friend, friend of the show, Kareem Assad.
00:33:27.520 And tons of people showed up. I said it was hundreds. Some people estimate that it may have
00:33:32.000 even been more than hundreds. They were protesting. A lot of them were there under the assumption that
00:33:37.440 it was a bail hearing for a gentleman named Daniel Senecal, or as he likes to go by Danny Senecal,
00:33:44.640 apparently. There's some rumors going around that this individual identifies as a woman,
00:33:51.040 presumably with a penis. I know that doesn't make sense, but whatever, I'm just the reporter.
00:33:56.640 To some, it makes sense, Alex. Yeah. Can we actually just run that clip quick before we get...
00:34:02.000 Yeah, sure. Go ahead.
00:34:02.800 Can we just run that clip?
00:34:14.640 Just one thing I wanted to say quick, Alex. While that clip was running, I just looked up the
00:34:36.160 population of St. Catharines, 140,000, so a pretty small town or whatever it is.
00:34:42.640 For that many people to show up, certainly some people came even maybe from out of town. Yeah.
00:34:48.640 Willie, you're making an expression like you know something about St. Catharines that we should know
00:34:52.880 about. I mean, just in defense of our viewers from St. Catharines in Ontario, I mean,
00:34:57.920 you know, whether it's a city or a town, I think it's a beautiful town. Just what surprises me from the
00:35:03.040 video was the fact that I'm looking at the proportion of people there. So I think the
00:35:06.800 majority of people are actually from the local community. I'm also interested about the demographics
00:35:10.880 there. It looks like a lot of older folks with some youth. So there's a mix of age there for sure.
00:35:16.000 So that's, I think, a very important part because, you know, we heard from Pierre Pauli
00:35:20.160 have talked about jail, not bail. I'll let Alex start the conversation here for this story. But
00:35:24.320 I know that the more people showing up for this kind of protest event, the more you understand just how
00:35:31.040 chronic the failure of the justice system is these days. So but St. Catharines is a beautiful
00:35:36.080 town or you could say a small city. I think it has its own city hall and its own mayor. So I think
00:35:42.000 you can say it's a small city in Ontario. Yeah, it's an amazing turnout. I think that, you know,
00:35:48.080 I'm obviously not a mind reader. I don't know exactly what was in these people's hearts, but I think
00:35:51.440 that most of them were there because they are fed up with our criminal justice system. Just a little bit
00:35:57.200 more background, this individual who was having their courtroom appearance. And I attended the
00:36:00.800 appearance remotely. He was previously charged with sexual assault offenses back in 2021, I believe,
00:36:09.600 is his first offense. The details of that are that case are covered by a publication ban to protect
00:36:14.960 the identity of the victim. He was let out early and also added to the registered sex offender list,
00:36:21.760 which in Canada is not on public record. So I don't really understand why we have this list,
00:36:28.080 other than to perhaps help police more closely monitor individuals who are higher risk to the
00:36:32.400 public. I personally think that, you know, maybe we should have some sunshine law reforms and that
00:36:36.240 those lists should be public so that people have a better capability of protecting themselves and their
00:36:41.520 family from potential predators. In any case, this was not a bail hearing. It was what they call
00:36:47.520 a remand video conferencing appearance. I don't believe he actually has had a formal
00:36:54.160 bail hearing. I think that we'll be getting close to something approximating a formal bail hearing,
00:36:59.360 probably in November. The wheels of justice grind slowly. In any case, Senecal is still in custody,
00:37:04.800 but there is a lot of rumors going around that he wants to be put into a female prison, which just
00:37:10.640 stokes more outrage. I should also add, of course, you know, I don't want to get too detailed into the
00:37:16.560 crime that he committed most recently. But the allegation is, is that he violently assaulted a
00:37:21.040 child. And so I think it's really, really amazing and great that so many people showed up in defense
00:37:27.120 of that child, because as we all know, children are not really capable of defending themselves.
00:37:31.680 So that's where, you know, good law abiding citizens who care about the vulnerable come out and
00:37:38.160 do their best to affect change. And I should also know that in Canada, we do not have elected judges
00:37:42.800 and our lawmakers have only spent 20 days in the House of Commons this year. So when people want to
00:37:48.240 affect change, really protest is their only option at this point. So I'm really glad that they were
00:37:51.920 there. And I think it's a good thing. Yeah. And Alex, obviously, we know Conservative
00:37:56.880 leader Pierre Pelleve has said numerous times, I think that biological women should be in women's
00:38:02.560 prisons and biological men should be in men's prisons. But if I recall correctly, Alex, it was actually you
00:38:07.440 who asked Carney about his thoughts on that. And just remind me again, what he had to say there, Alex?
00:38:13.680 Well, he said that there were two biological sexes. And he, I think correctly, to some extent,
00:38:19.680 he drew a distinction between gender and sex. But I asked if there are two biological sexes,
00:38:24.560 do you believe that biological women are entitled to their own spaces, including prisons? And he said,
00:38:29.120 as a general objective, yes. Unfortunately, we've seen zero movement on whether or not those reforms
00:38:35.200 are going to take place. Yeah, as a general objective, yes, except that's not how the law
00:38:39.680 is in Canada. And I haven't changed it. So really, how do you really feel? Because if you were passionate
00:38:43.840 about this, I'm sure it would be changed. Yeah, I mean, I don't know what else to say about that.
00:38:52.800 It's a great, like you said, Alex, that was a great point there that the House of Commons has sat for
00:38:57.280 20 days. And obviously, we can't change the laws. I mean, we have so many examples of laws people are
00:39:02.240 calling to be changed. Alex's Canada laws, all types of voting laws, all types of laws that affect
00:39:07.120 us nationwide, but it can't be done if Parliament isn't sitting. So we'll have to see what happens
00:39:13.440 when the House of Commons resumes here very, very briefly, or very shortly, sorry, not briefly.
00:39:18.400 But anyways, I'm Isaac Lamoure. I'd like to thank my colleagues, Alex Zoltan and Waleed Tam Tam
00:39:22.400 for today's show. And remember, everything you heard today was off the record.
00:39:25.360 As you mentioned, sorry, Waleed, you go just quickly here, you mentioned the registered sex
00:39:35.680 offenders lists. And I'm just wondering whether you know this, you may not. But in other countries
00:39:40.000 that have these lists, like the US, for example, do I don't, I think it'd be a bit too obtrusive
00:39:45.520 if they had the people's addresses on there, because they might be getting attacked. But like,
00:39:49.200 if a registered sex offender moved into your neighborhood and was your next door neighbor,
00:39:52.160 like, would they have to, by law, tell you? Is that a thing?
00:39:57.680 It varies depending on where you are. I don't think that by law, there's anywhere where they
00:40:02.480 would have to give you a public notice, to the best of my knowledge. But there are registered
00:40:06.400 sex offenders lists where, you know, they will post the person's address. And I know that because
00:40:11.280 there's a website called Inmates Connects Canada, where different Canadian prisoners, you know,
00:40:17.360 that you can find like pen pals and stuff. And one of them is in the States. And the only way I was
00:40:21.520 able to find any information on their crimes was because they were on the registered sex offender
00:40:25.120 list and it lists their address. Yeah, yeah, yeah. So I was just curious, because you know,
00:40:31.440 you never know a sex offender moves onto your block, it'd be nice to know if you have children,
00:40:34.800 right? Like realistically? Yeah, of course, especially in Canada, when we can't lock them
00:40:40.000 up. I mean, walking around, right? I mean, it's the worst of both worlds. I mean, I totally, I get the
00:40:46.560 idea behind wanting to have a legal system that believes that people are, have issues that are
00:40:50.720 remediable. But if you're going to have that, then you should also, you know, balance public safety by
00:40:57.120 telling society that you're releasing a bunch of prisoners into their, into their neighborhoods.
00:41:03.200 Yeah, the only things I see around here are, hey, sorry, we're releasing this,
00:41:07.760 this murderer, this very dangerous individual, we can't keep them in prison, we're releasing them,
00:41:11.840 this person is a public danger, and they're being released. I mean, you see it so often.